Installation of 8.1.6 on solaris 8

Hi all,
Has any one tried installing Oracle 8.1.6 on solaris 8. The installation guide says it is supported only by 2.6 and solaris 7.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks

Ok thanks, I should have done all that explained in thelink you just suggested me.
Reassuming what I have done is :
- run the self-extracting bynary file and writing the path in the PATH variable.
But running the command: java -jar Monitor.jar C
it shows me the error Exception in thread "main" java.lang.StackOverflowError.
Should I run also a command like: ln -s <java dir> <java dir 2> ?
And should I set the variable CLASSPATH with a specific path...?
Thanks
Regards

Similar Messages

  • Help needed on installation of Oracle 9i on Sun Solaris 8

    Hey,
    Help needed on installation of Oracle 9i EE on Sun Solaris 8. The problem I met was: we followed the installation guide from the documentation. And we selected the choice "install software only". After it was done successfully, we run Database Configuration Assistant utility to create a database instance. But finally it always tried to create the instance at the root directory ( / ) which doesn't have enough space and then failed. The case was that we have set the enviroment parameters: $ORACLE_BASE = /export/mydata, $ORACLE_HOME = /export/apps/oracle9i. That means it should be installed at /export/mydata, but it didn't. Any help or advice are welcome. Thanks.
    Simon

    I have downloaded Oracle 11G R2 version from Windows and extracted it in Windows and copied it into DVD after extraction in two folders. Now I am mounting that DVD in Solaris 10 installed in my VMware . I made a new directory named as 'installation ' under /export/home/oracle and copied the folders from DVD to 'installation' folder. Now I am entering installation folder and try to do ./runInstaller as 'oracle ' user and getting the error mentioned before.
    Edited by: 916438 on Mar 31, 2012 5:55 PM

  • Error RCU-6083 during RCU installation prior to OBIEE 11g on Solaris

    Hello,
    I have an application server where I have an Oracle Database EE 11g running on Solaris 10 upgrade 9.
    The server has the following characteristics:
    - SUN V440
    - RAM 16GB
    - 2 processors Ultra Sparc III, 1.5GHz
    - OS: Solaris version 10
    - Disk space: 500GB
    - Oracle Weblogic Server 11g (10.3)
    - Ethernet 1 Gpbs
    I want to install the RCU schemas and OBIEE 11g (11.1.1.5.0) on this server so I verified all the pre-requisites for RCU and OBIEE and are OK.
    I am using the Repository Creation Utility (11.1.1.5.0) for Microsoft Windows (32-bit) to install the RCU because although the database is running on Solaris, the installer is not working through that server so I have a PC connected to the network and through that PC that has windows7 i could run the installer and connect to the db, using the SYSTEM user (because when i select sys as sysdba, although the password is correct, it doesn't connect to the db).
    However, the installer is sending the ERROR: RCU-6083 regarding the pre-requisites for the BIPLATFORM.
    I already use the following command alter system set processes=500 and restarted the db services, however the wizard installer is still sendig that error.
    What can be done to succesfully install the RCU?
    Thanks and regards,
    Rebeca

    Hello User,
    Below my comments in blue:-
    1) Do I need to install any Oracle DB (like to install 10g) prior to running rcu.bat file?
    Yes
    2) If I install Oracle 10g DB, does if create any compatibility issue while installing OBIEE 11g?
    Check below the compatibility matrix
    Oracle Fusion Middleware Supported System Configurations
    Thanks,
    Sasi Nagireddy.

  • 10g Universal Installer kernel errors while installing on Solaris 5.10

    Hi all,
    I have been trying to install Oracle 10g on a Solaris 5.10 machine (32-bit) as per the official Oracle Documentation for a couple of days now. It seems that the Universal Installer fails it's pre-installation steps and throws up error at the following kernel parameters:
    Checking for shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=4294967295; found no entry. Failed <<<<
    Checking for shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=100; found no entry. Failed <<<<
    Checking for semsys:seminfo_semmni=100; found no entry. Failed <<<<
    Checking for semsys:seminfo_semmsl=256; found no entry. Failed <<<<
    Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Failed <<<<
    I have followed the Oracle Documentation which says to change the kernel parameters using the resource control facility. For this I already have a project "oracle" which the user "oracle" has been assigned to:
    $ id -ap oracle
    uid=100(oracle) gid=100(oinstall) groups=100(oinstall),101(dba) projid=100(oracle)
    Following are the snapshots from the prctl command on the current state of the kernel paramters:
    For Checking for shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=4294967295; found no entry. Failed <<<<
    $ prctl -n project.max-shm-memory -i project oracle
    project: 100: oracle
    NAME PRIVILEGE VALUE FLAG ACTION RECIPIENT
    project.max-shm-memory
    privileged 254MB - deny -
    system 16.0EB max deny -
    The Oracle recommended value is 4GB - I expect Universal Installer check to fail for this, so I change the parameter using the resource control facility by logging in as root in a new terminal and keeping one oracle session active.
    # prctl -n project.max-shm-memory -v 4gb -r -i project oracle
    I can see that the parameter has been set correctly when I do:
    $ prctl -n project.max-shm-memory -i project oracle
    project: 100: oracle
    NAME PRIVILEGE VALUE FLAG ACTION RECIPIENT
    project.max-shm-memory
    privileged 4.00GB - deny -
    system 16.0EB max deny -
    For Checking for semsys:seminfo_semmni=100; found no entry. Failed <<<<
    $ prctl -n project.max-sem-ids -i project oracle
    project: 100: oracle
    NAME PRIVILEGE VALUE FLAG ACTION RECIPIENT
    project.max-sem-ids
    privileged 128 - deny -
    system 16.8M max deny -
    The Oracle recommended value is 100 - I do not expect Universal Installer check to fail at this parameter
    For Checking for shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=100; found no entry. Failed <<<<
    $ prctl -n project.max-shm-ids -i project oracle
    project: 100: oracle
    NAME PRIVILEGE VALUE FLAG ACTION RECIPIENT
    project.max-shm-ids
    privileged 128 - deny -
    system 16.8M max deny -
    The Oracle recommended value is 100 - I do not expect Universal Installer check to fail at this parameter
    Also when I try to issue the command:
    $ prctl -n project.max-sem-nsems -i project oracle
    I get:
    prctl: failed to get resource control for project.max-sem-nsems: Invalid argument
    Oracle recommends I should set a value of 256.
    After setting up all this I still get the following errors from Universal Installer:
    Checking for shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=4294967295; found no entry. Failed <<<<
    Checking for shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=100; found no entry. Failed <<<<
    Checking for semsys:seminfo_semmni=100; found no entry. Failed <<<<
    Checking for semsys:seminfo_semmsl=256; found no entry. Failed <<<<
    Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Failed <<<<
    Now when I modify the kernel settings by editing the /etc/system file without even a reboot I'm can see all my Universal Installer Kernel checks as passed.
    Not sure if I'm missing out some crucial step while setting up the kernel parameter using the resource control facility?
    ~ Somjit

    It is bug in OUI.
    OUI is looking at /etc/system to check the kernel parameter settings, but this file is not used (by default) in Solaris 10
    It should check the kernel parameter settings using the prctl.
    Check metalink note 363436.1
    workaround is to
    ./runInstaller -ignoreSysPrereqs
    or as You already did, change /etc/system as well.

  • Oracle 10g installation in an SPARC 64 bit Solaris 10 server

    Good morning,
    I'm trying to install Oracle 10g Enterprise Edition in a server with Solaris 10 as operating system. When I run the oui, the prerequisites part is passed but the installation gives me an error telling that the installer can't write in the /tmp directory. Nevertheless, I have writing grants and space enough in that directory, in fact the installer writes the installAction.log in this directory. So I don't understand which can be the problem?
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Mabel

    It could be you don't have enough free space on the tmp dir.
    Check this point from the
    Oracle® Database Installation Guide. 10g Release 2 (10.2) for Solaris Operating System (SPARC 64-Bit). Part Number B15690-02
    If you determined that the /tmp directory has less than 400 MB of free disk space, then identify a file system with at least 400 MB of free space and set the TMP and TMPDIR environment variables to specify a temporary directory on this file system:
    1. Use the df -k command to identify a suitable file system with sufficient free space.
    2. If necessary, enter commands similar to the following to create a temporary directory on the file system that you identified, and set the appropriate permissions on the directory:
    $ su - root
    # mkdir /mount_point/tmp
    # chmod a+wr /mount_point/tmp
    # exit
    3. Enter commands similar to the following to set the TMP and TMPDIR environment variables:
    Bourne, Bash, or Korn shell:
    $ TMP=/mount_point/tmp
    $ TMPDIR=/mount_point/tmp
    $ export TMP TMPDIR
    C shell:
    % setenv TMP /mount_point/tmp
    % setenv TMPDIR /mount_point/tmp
    ~ Madrid.

  • Installation of RAC with ASM on Solaris

    Hello Everybody
    I have to install and config oracle 10g RAC and ASM on Solaris, and as per my understanding network prerequisite is 3 IP's for each node,
    1) A public IP's registered on DNS and
    2) A virtual IP's registered on DNS, but NOT defined in the servers. can be defined later during Oracle Clusterware Install, And
    3) a private IP only known to the servers in the RAC configuration, to be used for the interconnect.
    The scenario is like
    The Servers & the Storage are in different Network and hence the public registered IP address & Virtual IP address is not possible. Only Private IP Address can be possible, But both the servers are accessible from to me Please confirm on the same.
    My question is
    Is is possible to build the RAC and ASM only with the private IP without the public and the virtual IP, if yes how?
    The setup is not going to be the part of any production or any development environment, I am new to this and just wanted to test the RAC installation with ASM.
    Your inputs or suggestion are greatly appreciated.
    Thanks for your time.

    Hi,
    for a 10g RAC you need:
    - a host-IP for every node
    - a private IP for every node
    - a virtual IP for every node
    Host-IP and Private IP must be assigned to both hosts and conenction between the hosts using either the host-IP or the private IP must be possible.
    Is is possible to build the RAC and ASM only with the private IP without the public and the virtual IP, if yes how?The term "private" and "public" does not refer to public IPs. It refers to the fact "private" is only for communication between the nodes and public for communication between the client and database.
    For a successful installation you need at least these three IPs on each system.
    So for instance your public IPs reside in the network 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 and your private interconnect network can be 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0. Both networks consists of private (i.e. non-routeable) IPs.

  • Installation of SUNWfontconfig packages on a Solaris 12/03 release?

    Hi!
    I have a SunfireV880 with the following release installed:
    Solaris 9 12/03 s9s_u5wos_08b SPARC
    # I have applied the the following 9_Recommeded Patch cluster to the system but I found the following ERROR in the
    /var/sadm/install_data/Solaris_9_Recommended_Patch_Cluster_log
    Installing 117203-05...
    Checking installed patches...
    One or more patch packages included in
    117203-05 are not installed on this system.
    Patchadd is terminating.
    Installing 117201-09...
    Checking installed patches...
    ERROR: This patch requires patch 117203-04
    which has not been applied to the system.
    After some analysis of dependencies I installed patch 116105-06 and tried to apply patch 117204-05 and 117203-04 but both failed since SUNWfontconfig is not installed.
    I found the missing packages on the Solaris 9 9/05 Disk 1
    SUNWfontconfig/
    SUNWfontconfig-64/
    SUNWfontconfig-docs/
    SUNWfontconfig-root/
    I have also installed
    hostxxx:opt/patch> pkginfo | grep SUNWzlib
    system SUNWzlib The Zip compression library
    system SUNWzlibx The Zip compression library (64-bit)
    Is there any way to install SUNWfontconfig* packages safely without doing a complete Solaris 9 9/05 release upgrade?
    Any known dependencies
    I have tried to Google for a solution to this issue but with no sucess.
    Appreciate any input.
    /Bengt
    Found a thread touch�ng this issue
    http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=840&threadID=5104139
    Message was edited by: Bengt
    Sparc_User
    Message was edited by:
    Sparc_User

    I was wrong about VCS not being important for the installation of the database on a zone. The database installed fine outside of VCS control from the Oracle 11gR2 download online, however, VCS 6.0 PR1 does not seem to support Oracle agents for Solaris 11, this is what their software requirements are:
    Supported software for VCS agent for Oracle
    The VCS 6.0 Platform Release 1 agent for Oracle supports the following software
    versions in a Veritas Cluster Server (VCS) environment:
    Oracle 10g R2, Oracle 11g R1, and Oracle 11g R2 (including 64-bit
    versions)
    Note: Veritas Cluster Server agent for Oracle supports the specified
    Oracle versions on Solaris if Oracle supports that version on Solaris.
    Refer to the Veritas Cluster Server Release Notes for more details.
    Oracle
    VCS VCS 6.0 PR1 on Solaris
    For Solaris SPARC:
    Solaris 10 (32-bit and 64-bit)
    For Solaris x64:
    Solaris 10 (64-bit)
    Note: For each platform, Symantec recommends applying the latest
    Solaris operating system patches available from Oracle. Visit Oracle’s
    Web site to download the latest patches.
    Solaris
    There is no "ContainerOpts" attribute in VCS 6.0 PR1 for Solaris11......

  • Problem with installation oracle application server 10g on Solaris 10x86

    Hello all.
    Help me, please.
    I'm trying to install Oracle aplication server 10.0.1.2.0.2 on solaris 10x86.
    When i install oracle infrastructure(metadata repository and identify management),
    i have a problem - on step "Configuration Assistants", where assistants will confugure and start the components, "Single-Sign On Configuration Assistant" -Failed
    (Details:....
    Finished executing the call.Child Process has exited.
    SSO Configuration Assistant failed.
    Configuration assistant "Single Sign-On Configuration Assistant" failed
    Anybody know, how solve this problem?
    Sorry for my english.

    Hi.
    Now
    /etc/hosts
    127.0.0.1 localhost
    82.179.1.1 testoracle loghost
    /etc/resolv.conf
    domain kemsu.ru
    nameserver 82.179.1.5
    Or must be in /etc/hosts/
    82.179.1.1 testoracle.kemsu.ru loghost
    You about this?

  • Installation problem of WL6.0SP1 on solaris

    When I install WL6.0SP1 on Sun Solaris, it gives such message:
    weblogic600sp1_sol.bin Preparing to install...
    Error: failed /tmp/install.dir.16036/Solaris/resource/jre/jre/lib/sparc/client/libjvm.so,
    because ld.so.1: /tmp/install.dir.16036/Solaris/resource/jre/jre/bin/../bin/sparc/native_threads/java:
    fatal: libCrun.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory
    >
    My classpath is set as:
    /usr/java1.2/lib:/oracle/product/8.1.6/jdbc/lib/classes12.zip:/usr/local/j2sdkee1.2.1/lib/j2ee.jar:
    Does any one know what is wrong with it?
    Thanks.

    You probably need Solaris patches. I had this problem to installing on Solaris
    7. GO to Sun's web site to look for pathces relating to C runtime libs.
    "Yingwei" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    When I install WL6.0SP1 on Sun Solaris, it gives such message:
    weblogic600sp1_sol.bin Preparing to install...
    Error: failed /tmp/install.dir.16036/Solaris/resource/jre/jre/lib/sparc/client/libjvm.so,
    because ld.so.1: /tmp/install.dir.16036/Solaris/resource/jre/jre/bin/../bin/sparc/native_threads/java:
    fatal: libCrun.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory
    >
    My classpath is set as:
    /usr/java1.2/lib:/oracle/product/8.1.6/jdbc/lib/classes12.zip:/usr/local/j2sdkee1.2.1/lib/j2ee.jar:
    Does any one know what is wrong with it?
    Thanks.

  • Installation issue with Weblogic610sp1_sol.bin for solaris platform?

    Hi,
    I have downloaded weblogic610sp1_sol.bin file for solaris platform and when i try to install, its is preparing to install & executing the file but suddenly throws an error saying
    " error: can't find libjava.so."
    Even i tried with other versions of weblogic also...
    But same problem.....
    I have installed jdk1.3.1 for solaris. I am able to install other java related programs & it is running successfully.
    Any idea...
    Thanks,
    Dinesh.

    Hi.
    Can you verify that the size of the file you downloaded is 90,941,843? Also post the checksum of the file. What version of Solaris are you installing on? Most folks having this problem
    have a corrupted bin file.
    Thanks,
    Michael
    Dinesh wrote:
    Hi,
    I have downloaded weblogic610sp1_sol.bin file for solaris platform and when i try to install, its is preparing to install & executing the file but suddenly throws an error saying
    " error: can't find libjava.so."
    Even i tried with other versions of weblogic also...
    But same problem.....
    I have installed jdk1.3.1 for solaris. I am able to install other java related programs & it is running successfully.
    Any idea...
    Thanks,
    Dinesh.--
    Developer Relations Engineer
    BEA Support

  • Coredump during installation of iAS 6 SP4 on Solaris 2.6

    We have iAS 6 sp4 and iWS 6 sp1 on Solaris 2.6 (updated patches!). We can install iWS, ldap, admin server, but if we install iAS itself we get a coredump right after enter the ports etc, before he starts to extract the data:
    Finished with gathering of information.
    Next, the iPlanet Application Server files will be extracted. After that,the iAS configuration and registration based on your responses will begin.
    Press ENTER to continue: ./invoke_nas_preinst[15]: 7120 Segmentation Fault
    ERROR. Failure installing iPlanet Application Server Main. Do you want to continue [n]?

    What hardware are you running? UltraSPARC?

  • OSB 2.6  installer for solaris 10 (64 bit) - required

    Hi,
    I am are not able find the installer for OSB 2.6 for solaris 10(64 bit).
    Where can I find the same?
    Thanks in Advance.
    Rajani

    Don't know what a service id is, but you will need to be an oracle customer, which I assume you are if you are requesting old software.
    here is the link I use
    https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/f?p=130:14:5775706955868202591::::p14_database_id,p14_docid,p14_show_header,p14_show_help,p14_black_frame,p14_font:NOT,763603.1,1,1,1,helvetica
    cheers
    James

  • Solaris 8 installation warning

    While booting from the Solaris diskette or the CDROM I get the following message:
    Warning: ACPI Tables not in reclaim memory.
    Does anybody know anything about this message?
    The system is a Pentium 4 with 128 MB from Gateway.

    I tried your sugestion but it did not work.
    The DCAs used were the one included in
    patch 110930-03
    and the one included in Solaris 8 1/01
    With any of them I get the message
    Warning: ACPI Tables not in reclaim memory
    Then I get the message:
    Warning: Resource Conflict-both devices are added
    Non_ACPI device: PNP0C01
    Memory: 9FC00 ...
    ACPI device: PNP0C01
    Memory: 9FC00 ...
    Warning: Resource Conflict-both devices are added
    Non_ACPI device: ISY 0050
    Port: 3F0 ...
    ACPI device: ISY 0050
    Port: 3F0 ...
    After that the installation continues unitl you select the "Solaris Iteractive" option. At this point the
    boot process is initiated again.
    Here are some details of my current configuration:
    System Manufacturer     Gateway
    System Model E-4600
    System Type x86-based PC
    Processor     Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU
    1400MHz GenuineIntel ~1397 Mhz
    Memory 128MB
    BIOS Version GB85010A.15A.0028.P09
    Video:     NVIDIA RIVA TNT2 Model 64
    Network:     Linksys LNE100TX
    Fast Ethernet Adapter(LNE100TX v4)
    Drive     D: MATSHITA CD-ROM CR-594      
    Drive     E: _NEC NR-7700A       
    Sound     Creative Sound Blaster AudioPCI
    128D (WDM)
    Modem     56K PCI Voice Modem
    SF-1156IV R9A
    If you have any other idea please let me me know.
                   Thanks

  • Installation of Solaris 9 Intel Version in Windows XP PC

    I am very much interested in installation of Solaris 9 intel version in my PC which is windows XP version.
    My PC Processor : AMD Athlon
    I am not able to install solaris 9 in my PC.
    Sun boot version is Sun OS secondary boot version 3.0.
    During installation,i am going untill selection of type of installation. After selecting the Interactive type,the system is rebooting again without installing.
    Select the type of installation you want to perform
    (1) Solaris Interactive
    (2) Custom Jumpstart
    After selecting from above,the system is rebooting again without installing.
    Please help me with the installation.

    Try on HCL BigAdmins website to know if your hardware is supported

  • Installation of Solaris 9 intel version in windows XP

    I am very much interested in installation of Solaris 9 intel version in my PC which is windows XP version.
    My PC Processor : AMD Athlon
    I am not able to install solaris 9 in my PC.
    Sun boot version is Sun OS secondary boot version 3.0.
    During installation,i am going untill selection of type of installation. After selecting the Interactive type,the system is rebooting again without installing.
    Select the type of installation you want to perform
    (1) Solaris Interactive
    (2) Custom Jumpstart
    After selecting from above,the system is rebooting again without installing.
    Please help me with the installation.

    Are you trying to install Solaris 9 onto a server that is already running Windows XP and to keep Windows XP too?
    You'll need to create a partition on which to install Solaris, - search for Solaris Windows Dual Boot on docs.sun.com for more information.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Installation of 0TCT_MD_C_FULL_P01 failled!

    Hi Friends, I am trying to install process chain 0TCT_MD_C_FULL_P01 from business content. After displaying all the activation messages at the bottom of the screen, it ended up with a message "Source System Does not exist". I went to log file to see

  • My subscription payment didn't work

    Hi I need help with my subscription payments, it's been working for over a year and now suddenly it has a problem with my payment. My back account is not the problem money wise. So my question is do I start up a new subscription or wait and it will r

  • Yuel Boyce - Adobe reader not working

    Hello,I am Yuel Boyce. I have windows 7 laptop. Adobe reader is not properly functioning on my laptop and mostly shows error when open file. I have no other options to read files as most of my files supported Adobe reader. Can someone suggest me appr

  • Por que no puedo usar variable fecha en este query.

    en este query he intentado utilizar la variable   para lo que sería mi variable fecha, por queno me la esta aceptando el generador de consultas del sap?. SELECT distinct 'series'= case When T0.series=1 then ' FORJADORES' WHEN T0.series=34 then  'UNIV

  • Which Mac mini should I buy ?

    Hi, Please I'm confuse and I can't make a decision, Which Mac mini is good for me: Note that I'll used the new mac for IT development. 2012 Mac Mini ( $799 on Amazon ) 2.3 GHz quad-core Intel Core i7 (Turbo Boost up to 3.3GHz) with 6MB L3 cache 4 GB