Installing different versions of Oracle on the same server

We have a client that is currently on Oracle version 9.2.0.3. There is a project beginning that will have them upgrading to either 10g or 11g(still tbd). The project will have this happening in different steps. Therefore, we will need to continue to have the 9.2.03 db up and available while certain accounts are being migrated to the newer version.
Question is - can you install 2 versions of Oracle on the same server without any issues?
Or would we be better off purchasing a separate server to install 10g or 11g.

Depending on the OS certification you should be able to run both. You'll probably have to patch up the OS though. One of my servers has 3 different Oracle homes (9.2.0.5 - 10.2.0.2).
You can check the certification by clicking on the certify tab in metalink.

Similar Messages

Can I install two versions of NW in the same server?

I have BW installed in a server running on Netweaver 7.3. but I need to install Netweaver 7.02 to do some tests, is it possible to install this other version in the same server? or will there be conflicts after the installation of the second version?
Thanks in advance,
Luis.

HI,
sapinst detects existing instances, and makes sure that you dont use the same instance numbers => same tcp ip ports for diferent sap instances, wich would cause conflits.
so in the limit you can install any number os sap systems on the same host, given you have enought hardware resourses.
best regards,
Ricardo Caramona

Install two versions of Safari on the same Mac?

Is it possible to install two different versions of Safari on the same Macintosh? It looks like we'll need to test for both Safari 1.x and Safari 2.x. Or will we need to use two different computers?

One poster has said he had both Safari 1.2 and Safari 2.0.x running on the same machine under OS X 10.4.x, and another poster said he could not install Safari 1.2 under OS X 10.4.4. So I don't know if its possible or not. Even if you do get both installed, you may not see all of the differences you would in running Safari 1.2 or 1.3 under OS X 1.3.x and Safari 2.x under OS X 10.4 because if both are running under the same version of OS X, then both are using the same underlying Webcore technology. Some differences would still be apparent. The person who claimed to have both versions installed claimed that Safari 1.2 worked with some site he needed to use while Safari 2.x did not.

How to Install R/3 and CRM on the same Server?

Hi All,
I would like to install R/3 and CRM on the same server (as the load is less). I know how to install them seperately.
I would like to have some instructions how to have them installed on the same server.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Vijay

As Sunil explained - MCOD (or) you can think to have 2 differnt DB SID's as weel 2 different SAP SID's. By default 1st Installation takes Listener Name as LISTENER & port 1527 when you are doing second Oracle installation use another lister name as LISTENER002 & give port 1526 ( for example).
MCOD will be the best option to unplug from oracle instalation requirement but - think of future plans. even it can be any size business don't think to do MCOD with SAP Business System like R3 .
Becuase qwe may have different requirements from the Business / functionla Team for refreshing / building the development system with a copy of production system - don;t get confused there are Techniques for Refreshing a Development Instance with production system also.
Any how you have to take decission to go with MCOD (or) not . I also request SUNIL to comment on MCOD installations with R3 system .
But I beleive Sascha Version is wrong - i can have multiple application servers of differnet products on single Box if my OS supports.
as application servers will have 3 individual mount point which points to different system
<Central Instance>:/sapmnt/<SID>/global
<Central Instance>:/sapmnt/<SID>/prfoile
<Central Instance>:/sapmnt/<SID>/exe
each SID NFS mount point can point to different sever & i can multiple application server of differnt SAP Products on 1 BOX.
Trans directory is problem - but it does not require either for installation (or) for runningAS instance .

Ok to installing NW 7.1 Mobile on the same server as CRM 7.0?

Hi,
On a physical server (HP-UX), we have CRM 7.0 (basis 7.01 SP7) installed already (development system). Is it possible to install NW 7.1 Mobile on the same server (as sandbox)? Is there any issues that you see this might cause?
We will install the SUP and Relay server on a separate Linux box.
Thank you for any pointers,
-Serine

It's not advisable to run separate installations of
ColdFusion 7 and ColdFusion 8 single server on the same machine the
re are several services that will try to use the same ports.
However, you can install ColdFusion Enterprise using the
multi-server configuration and then deploy the J2EE versions of
ColdFusion to JRun. You can change the JVM that each instance uses
(we recommend the latest 1.4 for CF7 and the latest 1.6 for CF8),
and everything should run fine.
ColdFusion itself is essentially just a J2EE application, the
J2EE server itself is JRun 4. So the specific answer to your
question is "don't install 2 copies of JRun 4 to the same machine".
But yes, it's 100% possible, I'm running this configuration in my
own development environment.

How to use two different versions of Firefox at the same time on Snow Leopard?

I recently upgraded to Firefox 4.0 on my 27" iMac running Snow Leopard 10.6.7.
Previously, I was using Google's "Page Speed" along with Firebug in Firefox 3.6.15 to optimize images in my web pages, and to find other areas to optimize.
Page Speed is not yet compatible with Firefox 4.0. I wrote to Google about this some time ago -- no answer yet.
If I run Firefox 3.6.15 in order to use Page Speed, I run into a few problems afterward when I start using Firefox 4.0 again, since they both use the same "Firefox" folder in my "Application Support" folder.
How can I set it up so that I can have two separate "Firefox" folders in my "Application Support" folder?
Or is there an easier way to use two different versions of Firefox simultaneously, even if one has extensions and/or plug-ins installed which are not compatible with the other version?
Thanks for a great browser!

Please disregard my question. I just conducted more web search and learned how to use Firefox's profile manager in order to make a separate profile for Firefox 3.6.15.
You can find instructions on this page:
http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Managing%20profiles#os=mac&browser=fx35
'''A small tip:'''
If your Firefox app is named anything other than "Firefox" -- say for example "Firefox 3.6.15" -- when you follow the instructions at the above link, make sure you escape the blank space that is before the version number by adding a backward slash before it, when you type the command string in the Terminal. In other words, in that string, you should use this:
Firefox\ 3.6.15
I hope that helps someone.
WW

Running 2 different version of Quicktime at the same time ?

Is it possible to have two different versions of QuickTime installed on one PC at the same time ?
The reason for this is that I have been using Sony's software MovieShaker to import and work with Sony's proprietary MMV video camera format. This piece of software works with QuickTime version 5.
Now that I recently bought the iPod nano, I have installed iTunes, which of course works with a higher version of QucikTime (6+).
With this higher version of QuickTime, my video capture software does not work and vice versa, with QuickTime 5 my iTunes (and iPod nano) can not be used.
Is there a possible workaround that someone is aware of such that I can still work from one PC?
Appreciate any feedback - thanks
PC Windows Windows XP Pro Sony Movieshaker 3.1 MMV format

You can only have one full installation of the QuickTime system software but the Player is just an application and should work with later versions. So what you need to do is re-install QT 5, which you can find for Windows here:
http://www.apple.com/support/quicktime/
then rename QT Player, let say Quicktime Player5. then reinstall QT 6. This time it should ignore the renamed Player (to be safe save it off line somewhere before reinstalling QT 6). No guarantee for Windows but this techinque works fine in QT for MacOS. Hope this works for you.

Can I has 2 different version of flash at the same time?

I am using flash MX 2004, now I planning to install CS3 but I
do not want to uninstall MX 2004 because I has some work on it. I
afraid that after I change I cannot open my file.
Can I has 2 flash at the same time?
By the way I had installed flash player 9 from adobe website
but when I publish my swf, I cannot choose player 9 and all the swf
I has is in player 7 format. How can I change it? ( I cannot find
the player 9, I am sure I had installed )

You can have both versions at the same time. You can open MX
2004 files in CS3, as you may know, but not the other way around.
In addition, without Flash 8, you'll not be able to save backwards
to MX 2004 because Flash only saves back one version at a time. So,
you can save back to 8 from CS3, open it in 8 and save back to MX
2004 so long as you didn't have any features in your movie that was
specific to the newer versions.

[Solved?] Installing multiple versions of Firefox at the same time

I would like to install the normal Firefox in the repositories and also firefox-pgo-minefield-smp from the AUR so that I may use either one as desired.
Looking at the current PKGBUILD from http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33506 (pkgbuild @ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firef … p/PKGBUILD ) I am thinking that perhaps I would modify this line:
export LDFLAGS="-Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib/firefox-$_prever -Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--hash-style=gnu,--as-needed"
to reflect the path where I would like to install it like so:
export LDFLAGS="-Wl,-rpath,/opt/firefox-$_prever -Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--hash-style=gnu,--as-needed"
And then presumably fix my symlink at /usr/bin/firefox to point back to /usr/lib/firefox-2.6 again. (and also fix the menu links and I realize I would have to use an ugly 'pacman -U tarball --force' to install it -- there's got to be a better way as that is very ugly and wrong surely???? Perhaps modify the pkgname as well as conflicts and provides so I could install it more normally?)
Correct? Would I also need to modify a prefix or such besides this and if so where in the pkgbuild (ideally) or source would you recommend (must I change the actual makefile or does my modification in the PKGBUILD take care of this? Would you in your experience recommend another approach for this?
I thought it wise to ask here before hacking away with this stuff and possibly hosing my system in unforeseen ways. Please forgive my greenness. I have spent a few hours researching this but still am not quite sure thus I ask. While I think I could do it with a straight compile with a modified configure I'm unsure of how to do it best using the arch tools...
Thanks for your time.
Last edited by davidm (2010-02-08 14:51:21)

Basically solved but not yet mastered.
So I've figured out how to do this, it works, but not yet optimally and I am unsure about some things. Namely:
[david@arch-desktop opt]$ ls -l /opt/bin
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 Feb 8 07:27 firefox -> /opt/lib/firefox-3.7a1pre/firefox
[david@arch-desktop opt]$ ls -l /opt/lib
total 8
drwxr-xr-x 12 root root 4096 Feb 8 07:27 firefox-3.7a1pre
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Feb 8 07:27 firefox-devel-3.7a1pre
[david@arch-desktop opt]$ ls -l /opt/lib/firefox-devel-3.7a1pre
total 8
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Feb 8 07:27 bin -> /opt/lib/firefox-3.7a1pre
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Feb 8 07:27 idl -> /opt/share/idl/firefox-3.7a1pre
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Feb 8 07:27 include -> /opt/include/firefox-3.7a1pre
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Feb 8 07:27 lib -> /opt/lib/firefox-devel-3.7a1pre/sdk/lib
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Feb 8 07:27 sdk
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2082 Feb 8 05:06 xpcom-config.h
[david@arch-desktop lib]$ ls -l /opt/lib/firefox-3.7a1pre
total 17428
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2102 Feb 8 07:27 application.ini
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2531 Feb 8 07:27 blocklist.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 232 Feb 8 07:27 browserconfig.properties
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Feb 8 07:27 chrome
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 8 07:27 components
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 8 07:27 defaults
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 139 Feb 8 07:27 dependentlibs.list
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 8 07:27 dictionaries
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Feb 8 07:27 extensions
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3913 Feb 8 07:27 firefox
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 56788 Feb 8 07:27 firefox-bin
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 76888 Feb 8 07:27 greprefs.js
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 8 07:27 icons
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1846520 Feb 8 07:27 libmozjs.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 900176 Feb 8 07:27 libmozsqlite3.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 11540 Feb 8 07:27 libxpcom.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 14796800 Feb 8 07:27 libxul.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 30826 Feb 8 07:27 LICENSE
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 8 07:27 modules
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3108 Feb 8 07:27 mozilla-runtime
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10720 Feb 8 07:27 mozilla-xremote-client
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 154 Feb 8 07:27 platform.ini
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 8 07:27 plugins
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 177 Feb 8 07:27 README.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 16712 Feb 8 07:27 removed-files
drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 Feb 8 07:27 res
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10370 Feb 8 07:27 run-mozilla.sh
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 8 07:27 searchplugins
[david@arch-desktop include]$ ls -l /opt/include
total 80
drwxr-xr-x 11 root root 77824 Feb 8 07:27 firefox-3.7a1pre
It seems as though it is a bit messy, as if I have more than I need installed. Especially the two entries in /opt/lib/. Do I really need all this?
PKGBUILD:
# Maintainer: Devin Cofer <ranguvar{AT]archlinux[DOT}us>
# Contributor: blasse <koralik(at)gmail(dot)com>
# PKGBUILD MODIFIED The above info does not apply. Modified by davidm for personal use, not intended for distribution.
# This package is not a normal -hg package. I manually bump $_workingrev every now and again when
# a revision of Firefox passes all of the Linux tests on http://bit.ly/1O4siz
pkgname=firefox-electrolysis-nightly-opt
pkgver=999901
pkgrel=1
_prever=3.7a1pre
_workingrev='d2bed0c20e89'
_mozver=central
pkgdesc="Mozilla Firefox customizable web browser Electrolysis Nightly installed in opt (XULRunner independent, PGO optimized, 64-bit TraceMonkey, Dev tree, Multithreaded)"
url="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox"
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
license=('MPL' 'GPL' 'LGPL')
_soundsystem='alsa-lib' # 'alsa-lib' for ALSA, 'oss' for OSS
makedepends=('mercurial' 'autoconf-compat' 'gcc>=4.4' 'zip' 'pkgconfig'
'diffutils' 'libgnomeui>=2.24.1' 'python' 'wireless_tools')
depends=('gtk2>=2.18.0' 'gcc-libs>=4.4' 'libidl2>=0.8.13' 'mozilla-common'
'nss>=3.12.4' 'libxt' 'hunspell>=1.2.8' 'startup-notification>=0.10'
'libnotify>=0.4' 'mime-types' 'dbus-glib>=0.82' 'desktop-file-utils'
'cairo' ${_soundsystem})
#provides=("firefox-electrolysis-nightly-opt=$_pkgver")
#conflicts=('firefox-electrolysis-nightly-opt')
install=$pkgname.install
source=('mozconfig'
'firefox-minefield-smp.desktop'
'firefox-safe-minefield-smp.desktop'
'fix-mozilla-launcher.patch'
'mozilla-firefox-1.0-lang.patch'
'ldflags-namespec.patch'
'jemalloc-enable-pgo.patch'
'potential-pgo-fix.patch')
#Original hashes
# sha256sums=('8d08ee111b88473a53e8c0852d463971af7a827f796a94d3fe74ca2eed76ca0b'
# '21722965bb0bab05e3fbd2f584dbcaeb9f0726ed755f59bbf6fb26a7f964e6ec'
# '00641e2d7ba45a607522a621aa86c21e13b2951ebca920b1e0b538b0e1188445'
# 'd4948cc5878b2100b4d19b0fbc09119c34377593c5847678d5788db2b4e0fe43'
# '0ca095ff2af57297f615877a7e79ddc84d1a3f62509a8af6ca50aad7a8671f6a'
# '0e9631fdad5efa3fd7a95b59171f5d15420d10aa61748b920cc994ee9227915c'
# 'e6b8345215eb0c595cadfd6b1abb3a12a1cad8b8b1f3528e6affc58900695215'
# 'bf53a9712aada73dbecb45516bf932b52e7b8debf25cf19294adbfcc54d80028')
#My MODIFIED HAshes
md5sums=('ee857ec52fe3c7a047a282cfc5587d07'
'68cf02788491c6e846729b2f2913bf79'
'5e68cabfcf3c021806b326f664ac505e'
'63eee2d1da3b43c9d604f2253f242f40'
'bd5db57c23c72a02a489592644f18995'
'9e461e5fc73b241d68d08be908405a5e'
'df6fde73c9fdb38245f50b9b5bb09024'
'9587e0e6da42c883e34a46ee35cc3b7d')
# Don't use normal _hgroot/_hgrepo, we don't want Pacman automagically changing the pkgver.
_ff_hgroot="http://hg.mozilla.org/projects/electrolysis"
build() {
msg "* Note: If the build fails, try again, try without jemalloc PGO, and try *"
msg "* without PGO at all. Also, try with 'potential-pgo-fix.patch'. PGO can be *"
msg "* temperamental -- it can sometimes take two or three builds before you'll *"
msg "* get a good one. *"
sleep 15
cd "$srcdir"
# It can take a long time to re-fetch the Mozilla source...
# The commented lines are for use by experienced users who build often.
hg clone "$_ff_hgroot/mozilla-$_mozver" "mozilla-$_mozver" || return 1
# tar xf "$startdir/mozilla-$_mozver.tar.gz" || return 1
cd "mozilla-$_mozver"
# hg pull || return 1
# hg update || return 1
# cd ..
# tar czf "$startdir/mozilla-$_mozver.tar.gz" "mozilla-$_mozver" || return 1
# cd "mozilla-$_mozver"
# hg up "$_workingrev" || return 1 # Comment out this line to use the untested latest source.
cp "$srcdir/mozconfig" .mozconfig || return 1
# Don't strip if the user doesn't want to... ;p
if [ "$(check_option strip)" = "n" ]; then
sed -i 's/--enable-strip/--disable-strip/' \
.mozconfig || return 1
sed -i 's/--enable-install-strip/--disable-install-strip/' \
.mozconfig || return 1
fi
if [ "$_soundsystem" = "oss" ]; then
msg "Using OSS instead of ALSA."
sed -i 's/sydney_audio_alsa/sydney_audio_oss/' \
media/libsydneyaudio/src/Makefile.in || return 1
# Get rid of ALSA config system stuff (requires autoconf rerun)
sed -i '/alsa\//d' config/system-headers || return 1
sed -i '/alsa\//d' js/src/config/system-headers || return 1
sed -i '/LIB(asound/d' configure.in || return 1
fi
msg "Patching source."
msg "Patches from main Arch xulrunner/firefox packages..."
# Fix stub launcher - Arch
patch -Np0 -i "$srcdir"/fix-mozilla-launcher.patch || return 1
# Use LANG environment variable to choose locale
patch -Np1 -i "$srcdir"/mozilla-firefox-1.0-lang.patch || return 1
msg "Patches from this package..."
# PGO compilation LDFLAGS fix
patch -Np1 -i "$srcdir"/ldflags-namespec.patch || return 1
# Enable experimental PGO for jemalloc (speed).
# See Mozilla bugs #418866 and #419470.
patch -Np0 -i "$srcdir"/jemalloc-enable-pgo.patch || return 1
# Sometimes necessary for PGO build to work, especially when PGO compile
# aborts with an error about control sum mismatch (thx to methuselah!)
# patch -Np1 -i "$srcdir/potential-pgo-fix.patch" || return 1
msg "Setting up build."
# Changing the user's optimization flags is justified, because this is
# a package specifically for an optimized software build, and because of
# the official branding, binaries can't be redistributed anyways.
# These flags just set guidelines for the build, they are overridden in
# most compile job pieces by Firefox's better judgement.
#export CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe"
#export CXXFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe"
export CFLAGS="-march=i686 -mtune=pentium4 -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
export CXXFLAGS="-march=i686 -mtune=pentium4 -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
# The hash-style and as-needed flags are in Arch defaults anyways,
# and the other optimization falgs are almost definitely safe.
export LDFLAGS="-Wl,-rpath,/opt/lib/firefox-$_prever -Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--hash-style=gnu,--as-needed"
autoconf-2.13 || return 1
msg "Actual build."
# Yes, all this is SMP. MOZ_MAKE_FLAGS takes care of it.
# Compile a non-PGO build first to reduce chance of error in PGO build.
make -j1 -f client.mk build MOZ_MAKE_FLAGS="$MAKEFLAGS" || return 1
# Comment out remaining lines for a non-PGO build.
msg "Profiled build now."
# Don't let PGO disrupt the user, use a virtual framebuffer.
LD_PRELOAD="" /usr/bin/Xvfb -nolisten tcp -extension GLX :99 &
XPID=$!
DISPLAY=:99 LD_PRELOAD="" make -j1 -f client.mk profiledbuild \
MOZ_MAKE_FLAGS="$MAKEFLAGS" || return 1
kill -9 $XPID
package() {
cd "$srcdir/mozilla-$_mozver"
make -j1 DESTDIR="$pkgdir" -C ff-pgo install || return 1
# install -Dm644 "$srcdir/mozilla-$_mozver/other-licenses/branding/firefox/mozicon128.png" \
# "$pkgdir/usr/share/pixmaps/firefox.png" || return 1
# install -Dm644 "$srcdir/firefox--minefield-smp.desktop" \
# "$pkgdir/usr/share/applications/firefox-minefield-smp.desktop" || return 1
# install -Dm644 "$srcdir/firefox-safe-minefield-smp.desktop" \
# "$pkgdir/usr/share/applications/firefox-safe-minefield-smp.desktop" \
# || return 1
# Remove devel stuff.
rm -rf "$pkgdir/usr/include/"
rm -rf "$pkgdir/usr/lib/firefox-devel-$_prever/"
rm -rf "$pkgdir/usr/share/idl/"
mozconfig:
ac_add_options --enable-application=browser
mk_add_options MOZ_CO_PROJECT=browser
ac_add_options --prefix=/opt --libdir=/opt/lib
## System libs are preferred
ac_add_options --with-system-nss --with-system-jpeg --with-pthread
ac_add_options --with-system-zlib --with-system-libpng --with-system-bz2
ac_add_options --enable-system-cairo --with-system-hunspell --with-system-sqlite
ac_add_options --with-system-nspr
## GNU/Linux stuff
ac_add_options --disable-installer --disable-updater
ac_add_options --enable-official-branding
ac_add_options --enable-startup-notification
## Optimize
ac_add_options --disable-pedantic --enable-jemalloc --enable-xterm-updates
### Reverse these lines (enable vs disable) for a debug build
ac_add_options --enable-optimize --disable-debug --disable-tests
ac_add_options --enable-profile-guided-optimization
ac_add_options --enable-strip --enable-install-strip
## Edit these as you see fit
ac_add_options --disable-crashreporter --disable-parental-controls
ac_add_options --enable-printing --enable-xinerama
# Sane settings include cairo-gtk2-df, cairo-gtk2, and cairo-qt.
ac_add_options --enable-default-toolkit=cairo-gtk2
ac_add_options --enable-places --enable-svg --enable-pango --enable-canvas
ac_add_options --enable-smil --disable-java-xpcom --enable-canvas3d
# This is disabled in order to speed Firefox up, it prevents checking Google
# for every single URL Firefox processes. If you're using this package, it's likely you already
# know enough to be safe online, or are paranoid (perhaps with reason) about
# Google getting your URLs. Also, this is GNU/Linux, we have somewhat less to fear ;-)
ac_add_options --disable-safe-browsing
mk_add_options MOZ_OBJDIR=@TOPSRCDIR@/ff-pgo
mk_add_options PROFILE_GEN_SCRIPT='$(PYTHON) $(MOZ_OBJDIR)/_profile/pgo/profileserver.py'
export BUILD_OFFICIAL=1
export MOZILLA_OFFICIAL=1
mk_add_options BUILD_OFFICIAL=1
mk_add_options MOZILLA_OFFICIAL=1
# Want to change the compiler?
#export CC='gcc-4.5'
#export CXX='g++-4.5'
^ A dirty hack to download the latest nightly of the electrolysis tree, pgo optimized for an intel i686 P4 (not native to get around the seg fault bug). I just commented out the .desktop files as well as the icon for now. Also the conflicts and provides section have merely been commented out. The goal is to have this work independently from the standard firefox allowing me to run both on the system at the same time.
Anyone see anything that I have missed and could fix as far as doing the separate install in /opt using makepkg and the pkgbuild? I've been using arch less than a month and this is the first I've really hacked with a PKGBUILD and mozconfig so I feel I could really use the help. Any insight appreciated greatly.
Last edited by davidm (2010-02-08 15:25:49)

Installing Business Objects XI R2 on the same server (LPAR) multiple times

Greetings!
My goal is to create "multiple" Business Objects XI R2 instances on a single AIX LPAR, so that I might have up to 8 Business Objects environments. Each environment would be be used to promote reports through test and eventually production. Yes, I know 8 environments is a lot, they won't necessarily be running simultaneiously. We do want 8 environments, with 8 CMS databases all separated.
I belive there are two possibilities:
1. I can create 8 separate Business Objects installs, each in their own separate directory structure, each install owned by a different user. Each installation would use a separate set of ports statically bound to each service that needs to be accessed over a firewall (like CMS, inputFRS, outputFRS,...).
2. Run a single installation of Business Objects and keep sepaarate CMS databases and repositories. I doubt this would work as I've only been able to find configurations for clustering, in which all CMS servers use the SAME CMS database. Is this option even possible?
Does anybody have any similar experiences using AIX? I have already attempted getting a second install running (option #1) but so far I've not been able to keep the second environement's CMS server running using statically-bound ports. They will, however, run simultaneously on the second install without statically binding the ports.
Server details:
IBM AIX 5.3 TL-08
Business Objects XI R2 SP4
CMS database - IBM DB2 9.1.4
Reporting database - IBM InfoSphere 9.5
Server separated by clients via firewall
Users will access Infoview, some access w/Crystal Reports XI
Thanks for your consideration,
Sean Boone

Thanks for the replies everyone!
I've gotten the two environments running but the CMC from one environment is trying to control the CMC from the other. For example, I have added the two installations to a single machine and set them up as follows:
boadmin - userid of "first" environment
boadminf - userid of "second" environment
CMS #1: boenv:6400
Tomcat ports: 8080, 8443, 8005 (std)
CMS #2: boenv:5500
Tomcat ports: 5905, 1720, 1731
So when I login to the CMC on CMS #1 and check "Settings" I see the database alias that I expect. When I logout and then login to the second CMS I see the same CMS database alias. In other words, they are both using the same database. However when I run the "cmsdbsetup.sh" command, it shows the correct alias for each environment.
My only thought at this point might be that since the daemons were given default names I'm going to see the same "service names" even though they are controlled via a separate name server.
Any clues as to what might be the cause here?
Thanks again!
Sean Boone

How to run stand alone executables developed with different versions of LabView on the same system

I am using LabVIEW 8.2 to develop a stand alone executable for a target system. The target system already has a stand alone executable written by another vendor, using LabVIEW 7.1. I installed the LV RunTime Engine for 8.2 which left the 7.1 engine intact (as it should). The problem I am now having is that the drivers installed on the target system are incompatible with the NI-DMM vi's that I am using. My concern is that if I replace the old drivers with the ones I am using on my development platform I may end up breaking the old software. What would be an appropriate work around to ensure that the target system will be able to run both executables? (FWIW the system will NOT be running both executables concurrently.)
The target system is an embedded PXI card cage, running Windows XP, with a NI PXI-4070 DMM (among other instruments, however I have had not had this issue with the NI-DAQmx drivers).

Hi Yerffejj,
Thanks for sharing your issue with the community. I am struggling to see what you mean by "break the software." If you only have the two executables and LV Run-Time versions 8.2 & 7.1, then you just need to go to http://www.ni.com/support/ » Drivers and Updates » Search within Results: » enter "NI-DMM" » GO to get the DMM driver you need. To see the driver you were using on the development machine, just go to Measurement & Automation Explorer (MAX). The DMM driver should also automatically install DAQmx, NI-VISA, and NI-IVI, fyi.
Best wishes to you, and please let us know if that does not solve your problem.
Regards,
Dan Richards
Dan Richards
Certified LabVIEW Developer

In windows how do we install and activite multiple versions of tuxedo at the same time ?

Hi All,
In windows how do we install and activate multiple versions of tuxedo at the same time ?
Advance wishes

You can run different versions of Tuxedo on the same server, as long as they are installed in different directories.
See PeopleTools 8.53 installation manual Task 3-1: Installing Oracle Tuxedo
You can install Oracle Tuxedo once for each release on a machine, regardless of the number of PeopleSoft
applications or databases the server supports. For example, if you are a PeopleSoft 9.1 customer and have
Oracle Tuxedo 6.5 installed, you may install Oracle Tuxedo 6.5 and Oracle Tuxedo 11gR1 on the same
machine in separate directories. For example:
On Windows, you may install into C:\oracle\tuxedo11gR1_VS2010 and C:\tux65.
On UNIX, you may install into /home/oracle/tuxedo11gR1 and /prod/tuxedo/6.5.
E-TUX: Can Multiple Versions of Tuxedo Coexist on One Physical UNIX or Linux Server? (Doc ID 607828.1)

Can I have two active versions of JRE on the same PC?

Some one please advice me if I can keep two different versions of JRE on the same PC running under Win NT. I have to use one version(1.2.2) of JRE for running an application and a later version(1.3) for running some other applications.
I tried to install both and when I checked the registry entries, only one verion seems to be active at a time. Is there any workaround?
thanx,
Anoop.

Multiversion support is available in JDK 1.4.
You can download JRE 1.4 Beta 3 from http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4
and test this functionality.
The following url discusses this topic in detail with a mix of version 1.3 and 1.4 examples. Similarly, you can have a mix of version
1.2 and 1.4 also for your needs.
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/guide/plugin/developer_guide/version.html
Hope this helps.
Cheers!
Sun-DTS

Running multiple versions of iTunes on the same PC?

I like to always have the latest version of iTunes on my machine, but I also need to keep an older version (7.5 or lower) on my machine for compatibility reasons (please don't ask why - I just do). Is it possible to install multiple versions of iTunes on the same PC (using XP and/or Vista)? If this is not possible by simply installing in different folders, I'm guessing that I can use this "virtualization" that I've been hearing about. I've used Parallels on a Macbook before, but what can I use to create a virtual machine on a PC? Is there a free program that does this?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Virtual PC can do it, but it's not free. I think VMware as well, but likely not free. Actually, it seems you can evaluate VMware:
http://www.vmware.com/download/

Install different versions of Photoshop

This is my question (sorry for my english)
I have photoshop 7 and pothoshop CS3; can I install them both on my Computer ? (on the same hard disk, maybe in differnt directories)
This because I want to move slowly to CS3, but now I know better photoshop 7.
I want to know, if this cause problems..
Thank you so much for the attention

I have 5 different versions of Photoshop on the same hard drive (all legal, bought and paid for, except for version 1.0.7, which I nicked from the undernet just for purposes of nostalgic interest), if that tells you anything.

Installing different versions of Oracle on the same server

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for