Installing LabView 6.1 Runtime on Win 7 64 bit

Hi,
I have LabView 6.1 based program which I want to install and run in Windows 7 64bit. I tried to install LabView 6.1 Run time Engine. It looks like it starts loading then hang on for long time.
What is the issue here?
Regards

Fair point, I hadn't forgotten XP Mode, but simply chose not to suggest it as a solution at this point.  Not all versions of Windows 7 support XP Mode, so that isn't necessarily an option for the OP.
NI-DAQmx devices aren't supported in virtualised OSes like XP Mode, this is due to the nature of USB communication handling in virtualised OSes.  Typically, they are optimised for HMI devices or Mass storage, but not higher performance devices such as USB DAQ.  We don't know if the OPs application requires USB, another reason that XP Mode isn't necessarily a suitable option to suggest at this point.
Another noted issue with XP Mode is that it can brick certain USB devices for, as yet, unknown reasons.  This is not limited to NI Hardware specifically, but with USB devices in general that do not fall under the HMI or MS categories and is a problem that Microsoft are actively working on.  So rather than suggesting the use of XP Mode that could potentially cause problems with his hardware, if he is using any (which we don't know at this point), it is better to ask some more questions about the particular application and the OPs needs.
If the information from my last post was sufficient for the OP, then he/she needn't reply, if however, they require more information, then we can begin to explore other solutions such as XP Mode if it's appropriate.
When using older versions of LabVIEW, it is also a good idea to ascertain why/if an older version is required.  It is possible to open VIs from certain older LabVIEW versions in current versions, which I'm sure you are aware, so it might be that the OP isn't aware of this and might be under the impression that he must use the same version to work with his VIs.  Which isn't the case.  Hence my last question regarding why LabVIEW 6.1 is required.
For the sake of the post, this information is available here.  You can open LV 6.1 VIs in LV 2011.
I am completely aware that a simple search would have turned out those resources, that's exactly what I did to get the links to them.  However, not all LabVIEW users are aware that there are extra sources of information available by searching ni.com in addition to the forum search, so it could be helpful to point this out just in case.  Not all of the information I have sourced would necessarily be found by simply using the forum search bar, it might, but then again it might not.
Yes, I agree with you that there are other posts asking similar questions and Yes, I agree that in this instance searching for the issue at hand would probably have negated the need for this post to have been made, but whilst it is true that the OP might not have searched to see if he/she could resolve his/her issue, at least now he/she is aware of the resources that are available to him/her and can continue to be proficient and successful in the future.
hants1984: Having just read your last post, you should find the information you require in the above links.  The question on LabVIEW 8.5 in Windows 7 64 bit has come up in the past a lot on these forums, the official answer is no.  LabVIEW 8.5 is not supported in Win7 64, however, as discussed in the above post, XP Mode may be an appropriate solution for you.
Oli
LabVIEW Student Ambassador
National Instruments UK

Similar Messages

  • Installing LabView 8.2 runtime engine on Windows 7 64-bit

    We have a product built on LabView 8.2
    For a couple of years, we have been distributing this product on Windows 7 64-bit systems with no trouble at all.
    Today, we received a customer complaint indicating that the LabView 8.2 runtime engine cannot be installed on Windows 7 64-bit.
    Our verification team has confirmed this to be true.
    Interestingly, we have several Windows 7 64-bit computers with the LabView 8.2 runtime engine already installed.
    How is this possible?
    Has something changed in Windows that no longer allows the LabView 8.2 runtime engine?
    We are confused by the fact that this appears to be a new problem and the runtime engine did, at some point, install correctly on multiple Windows 7 64-bti computers.
    Any thoughts would be extremely appreciated.
    Attachments:
    lv_install_error.jpg ‏22 KB

    No, i dont think the 8.2 installer is corrupt, but it uses the Windows Installer service, which according the image has some problems. Maybe it recently updated? It's incompatible with that old installer so you need to downgrade it? It's corrupted and needs some fix?
    /Y
    LabVIEW 8.2 - 2014
    "Only dead fish swim downstream" - "My life for Kudos!" - "Dumb people repeat old mistakes - smart ones create new ones."
    G# - Free award winning reference based OOP for LV

  • Install LabVIEW on Windows 7 X64

    I'm trying to install LabVIEW from NI Developer Suite Third Quarter 2009 on Windows 7 X64 machine. The install program terminates with an unexpected error. I can install LabWindows/CVI from the same DVDs onto this machine.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I'm adding my own experience in installing LabVIEW 2009 onto Windows 7 (64 bit) in case it helps anyone else, but in fact there's no magic bullet for the problems I had, I did it the hard way.
    I saw no error messages at all, just that when the installer wanted DVD no.2, the DVD drive seemed to disappear.  Cursor remained as Windows 7 "timer donut", could do very little with PC except "master reset".
    I tried:
    A different DVD drive
    Upgrading to Windows 7 sp1
    Compatibility mode for Vista (as suggested above)
    In the end I just copied the contents of the 3 install DVDs onto my hard disk.  I named the directories as the DVD labels, and was impressed that the installer found all the parts automatically.  Until it got to the Device Drivers DVD, which I had forgotten to copy, but mercifully at that stage I could browse to the DVD drive.  No special compatibility settings used, but I did run setup.exe "as administrator".
    I'll put this down as a Windows 7 bug (and maybe specific to my hardware ?) rather than an NI problem.
    Along the way, as part of the sp1 upgrade, I got MS IE9, another great way to drop one's productivity (certainly made posting to this forum impossible, this done on a different machine).

  • Can i install Try version NW CE on Win Server 2003 64 bit or must it be 32?

    Hallo everybody,
    i wish install try version NW CE on Win Server 2003 64 ? Here
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/downloads?rid=/library/uuid/a0a6bd7b-3dfc-2c10-eb95-aae0f777d4ab
    i read it run on 32 bit. Mean that on 32 only or i can install on 64 Bit too?
    Thank you in advance!!!

    32 only.

  • How to install Oracle 10g ODBC driver  for win 64 bit?

    I need to install Oracle 10g ODBC driver for win 64 bit, I donot know how to do that,
    where to find the driver....
    The driver 10.1.0.5.0 25-Apr-2006 2.1 MB isnot for 64 bits Win server 2003.

    Dear Sir,
    Yes, you can find the Driver here
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/tech/windows/odbc/index.html

  • OPSC 12cR1 Install Error:no compatible version of 64-Bit java runtime exist

    The Full error msg from the 12cR1 installer script:
    Using Solaris sparc_64 Binaries
    localhost is alive
    warning: Jvm: System has greater version of 32-Bit java runtime (1.7.0_05) than
    the bundled version (1.7.0_02). However, no compatible version of
    64-Bit java runtime exists on the system. You can either choose to
    continue, in which case, the 64-bit support on the Enterprise
    Controller will be disabled or manually install the 64-Bit java runtime
    (1.7.0_05) and try again.
    Number of precheck info messages: 0, number of warnings: 1, number of errors: 0
    I saw that the 11g installer script had the same problem last year. Why is this still a problem?  How do I work around it?? The prior 11g workarounds did not work for me.
    My JAVA versions, both 32&64bit, are there:
    #java -d32 -version ; java -d64 -version
    java version "1.7.0_05"
    Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_05-b06)
    Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 23.1-b03, mixed mode)
    java version "1.7.0_05"
    Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_05-b06)
    Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.1-b03, mixed mode
    Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!!

    Ops Center bundles the Java runtime in the installation but it will not install it if there's a newer version already installed.
    In your case, you only have 32 bits version installed which is newer, so Ops Center cannot continue as you cannot install a lower version of the 64 bits.
    This will tell you the 32 bits version:
    # pkgparam SUNWj7rt VERSION
    You're probably missing the SUNWj7rtx - which is the 64 bit version.
    This will probably give you an error (this will check the 64-bit java version):
    # pkgparam SUNWj7rtx VERSION
    To see if you have it installed:
    # pkginfo | grep SUNWj7rtx
    To resolve this, you should install the same version in 64 bits (SUNWj7rtx) and then try the Ops Center installation again.

  • When installing itunes 10.5.1 for win 7 64 bit get message that installer is 32 bit.

    Atempted to install itunes 10.5.1 for Win 7 64 bit. Receive dialog box that the installer is 32 bit. Points me to an address in Apple for Bonjour Print Services for Windows. After clickin on OK the install proceeds but Itunes will not start.
    Itunes has also reformated the library so an older version of itunes can nolonger read the file.

    I got the same message about the network resource that I can't access.  The only difference is that I couldn't install Itunes 10.3 because I can't remove the old version of Bonjour.  I couldn't get rid of anything in add/remove programs, but I went into my program folders and deleted everything that had to do with Itunes.  I also ran a Windows Cleanup Utiltiy.  Nothing will work.  I still can't remove Itunes, Bonjour, Quicktime, MobileMe Control Panel, Apple Mobile Device Support, Apple Application Support, or Apple Software Update in add/remove programs because they are on a network resource that I can't access even though I deleted them from the program folders.  This is very frustrating!

  • Trouble installing labview runtime engine

    Can not install labview runtime engine.  Says there is already a higher version installed.

    Yes, this is a pain - and I have no idea why NI would design their installers in this way. I can think of no rational reason. In any case, the work around is to uninstall everything and then reinstall in a different order. For example, I ran into the problem was trying to install a runtime executable on a machine that already has some NI drivers installed. Part of that installation was that it installed the V7.1 runtime engine. When I then went to install my executable which was built in V7.0 it wouldn't install. To get around this bug I had to uninstall all NI software and then reinstall my executable and then the drivers, in that order.
    Mike...
    Certified Professional Instructor
    Certified LabVIEW Architect
    LabVIEW Champion
    "... after all, He's not a tame lion..."
    Be thinking ahead and mark your dance card for NI Week 2015 now: TS 6139 - Object Oriented First Steps

  • Pdf printer is not get installed while installing adobe acrobat pro 11 in win 7 32 bit

    pdf printer is not get installed while installing adobe acrobat  pro 11 in win 7 32 bit

    BlackCat,
    Two things:
    1) Acrobat 8 Pro is not Win 7 compatible, no less Win 7 64-bit copmpatible
    2) Reader X and Acrobat 8 are not a supported combination. Reader X and Acrobat X is the first Windows combination that is supported by Adobe. Reader X and Acrobat 8 will cause problems.
    You are using a brand new 64-bit OS, you need to use an application that is designed to work with it. Acrobat X is the way to go, HOWEVER, there are still growing pains with Acrobat X, Win 7 64-bit, and the latest version of Office.

  • How do I install Labview 64 bit support for the labview fpga module?

    see subject.

    Hi,
    The LabVIEW FPGA Module uses the 32-bit version of the Xilinx tools, even on the 64-bit OS.
    There is no 64 bit version of LabVIEW FPGA and you must have LabVIEW 32 bit
    installed on your 64-bit machine to use the compatible version of
    LabVIEW FPGA.
    NI LabVIEW FPGA Module will run within the 32-bit emulation layer, Windows on Windows (WOW64).
    regards,
    Houssam Kassri
    NI Germany

  • Error installing LabVIEW 2011 on Win 7

    I'm getting an error installing LabVIEW 2011 Professional:
    I found a thread concerning missing MSIs, which suggested that one run setup.exe with the /log function, so I did, but I don't think it actually says anything useful.
    I also found a Microsoft download page for WindowsInstaller-KB893803-v2-x86.exe, which is the thing that's supposed to be missing. This seems to be an old version of the installer (most recent compatible OS = WinXP SP2), so I don't really feel like installing this on my Windows 7 system.
    Help!! Thanks in advance.
    -- Philip

    Hi Keller,
    I'm Jamie an Applications Engineer at NI UK.
    It does seem that you are missing some of the necessary support files required for the installer to run correctly, the details of which are available in the KnowledgeBase article here. Did you download the install files or are you installing from disk?
    In addition to the setup.exe file, ensure that you have copied the following folders to the target PC or destination folder when creating an installer with LabVIEW.
    bin
    license
    supportfiles
    Hope this helps get you up and running with LabVIEW 2011, let me know if you experience any further issues.
    Thanks
    Jamie
    Jamie S.
    Applications Engineer
    National Instruments

  • How can i install labview in a AMD64Linux machine?

    Hello:
    I'm a linux user, I have Debian installed and maybe changing for Suse or Mandrake due to the NI's preference on those two OS. But I have only one question: is it possible to install LabVIEW in a linux that's native AMD64, this means, that if there's a 64-bit Linux Version of LabVIEW?
    Thanks for reading this.

    Hi panthell, your concerns have solid bases. If you want to Learn LabVIEW and get full functionality, I will suggest using Windows. But if you want to use Linux you will find less trouble with the  32 bit OS.
      The 32 bit Suse can work with 64bits as if there were 32. So it could work, but you won’t have all the functionality or will have to deal with more small problems.  Also there is a version of 64 bits of Suse, it has some compatibility mode to run programs as 32 bits systems. Using this final option you may have the core functionalities running but might have trouble with NI drivers. Still using Linux 64 bit will have some of the limits the Linux and the 64bits.
    http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/doc/suse/suse9.0/adminguide-9.0/node14.html
     LabVIEW as it works on a Runtime can be used in many platforms the officially supported are the ones that we had made tests and are confident they will work
    Benjamin C
    Senior Systems Engineer // CLA // CLED // CTD

  • Should I have installed Microsoft Office 2010 Filter Pack 64 bit with Ex 2013 SP1?

    I have installed Exchange 2013 SP1 on a 2012R2 server, and all went well (I am at early stages of migration).
    Following the pre-reqs listed here: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb691354%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx#WS2012
    I installed Microsoft Unified Communications Managed API 4.0, Core Runtime 64-bit only.
    Since then I have seen other articles suggesting that I install:
    Microsoft Office 2010 Filter Pack 64 bit
    Microsoft Office 2010 Filter Pack SP1 64 bit
    Given I didn't notice any errors in the install, do I need to install those filter packs or is that outdated advice?
    regards
    Roga

    Thanks for taking the time to post Ed
    I did a bit more research and it appears that there is more than one view on this.
    E.G. this blog
    Why Exchange 2013 doesn’t need the Microsoft Office Filter Pack says:
    "Exchange 2013 swaps MSSearch for the Search Foundation, a component shared with SharePoint 2013. The Search Foundation has no need of the Office Filter Pack because it includes its own filters. Unfortunately, until SP1 came along,
    the Exchange 2013 Setup program overlooked this fact and stated that the Office Filter Pack was a prerequisite. Setup would install if the Office Filter Pack was missing, but who’s going to ignore a warning issued by Setup. In any case, that warning seems
    to have finally been suppressed."
    This blog
    Planning and migrating a small organization from Exchange 2007 to 2013 (Part 10) has:
    "After choosing the relevant setting needed to begin installation, the Exchange 2013 setup program will now perform readiness checks. Assuming these complete successfully, we'll expect to see just one warning.
    This warning relates to the lack of the Office 2010 Filter Packs, which are not required for installation, and are only required to create Transport Rules for OneNote or Publisher files"
    And this one
    Exchange Server 2013 FAQ: Is the Office Filter Pack Required?
    "The Exchange 2013 pre-requisites page on
    TechNet, at the time of this writing, does include the Office Filter Packs as a step in the preparation of a server for Exchange 2013. What it doesn’t make clear is that they are not required.
    The new Exchange Search already has support for indexing/searching Office file types, as well as a series of other file types including some third party formats such as PDF. You can see a full list
    here.
    So should you install the Office Filter Pack? If you want to stop seeing that warning message, then yes. If you want to take the approach of only installing required software on your servers, then no. Consider also that installing it means potentially having
    to update it later on if there is a bug fix or a security issue."
    The final para above is the approach that I have now taken, but if someone can give me a good reason to install office 2010 filter packs on Ex 2013 sp1 I'll revise my view
    regards
    roga

  • Blue screen after installing labview 8

    I recently installed Labview 8 Professional Dev. Suite on to a Win. XP SP2 system.  The image before installation was stable.  After the installation and reboot, the system blue screens (I have been unable to read the exact message on the blue screen) and reboots.  I was able to boot if I selected "using last know configuration" option in the Windows XP boot options, indicating that the problem is driver/registry related.  After I use the last know configuration, I get an error message "nidevmon.exe - Application Error.  The application failed to initialize properly (0xc0000142).  Click on OK to terminate the application." 
    I tried to repair all of the installed NI products without any success.
    Device manager shows all devices installed properly without any conflicts.
    Please advise on how I can resolve this installation conflict.
    Thanks.
    --Jeff

    Hi, I am experiencing the same problem.  When my system boots up I receive the "nidevmon.exe could not be initialized" error message.  When I try to manually start the program after startup, I still get the same message.  I am running Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] and have also updated my system with the latest patches.  I have the ni USB-6008 device.  My system is an IBM Thinkpad T40, 1.5Ghz Centrino, with 512MB ram, and 80GB hd.  I have installed labview 7.1 and then NI-DAQmx 8.0 that came with the card.
    Furthermore, the hardware does not succesfully install on my system.  After I install the software, reboot and plug the usb device in, the hardware wizard pops up.  However, in the end, I get "Windows cannot initialize the device driver for this hardware. (Code 37)".  I suspect this has to do with the nidevmon.exe not initializing.  The ni hardware appears to be fine, I have successfully installed the devices in another system.  I uninstalled and reinstalled the ni-daqmx 8.0 software several times, and even downloaded version 7.5 from the web, however this did not solve the problem either.  I would appreciate any suggestions..
    Thanks,
    Arash

  • Error while installing web tier on soalaris X86-64 bit

    Hi All,
    I want to install Oracle WEB TIER(HTTP server and oracle web cache), but in the step that "Specify WebLogic Domain", I obtain the following error.
    INST- 07281: JRF is not setup in the specified domain
    - Enter a domain wich has JRF setup.
    Then I tried to extend current domain with JRF product support to enable web cache. But I am not getting the JRF option when I extend my domain or create a new domain. I am getting only 3 options on the domain creation page:
    1. Basic WebLogic server Domain
    2. Weblogic advanced Web Services for JAX-RPC Extension
    3. Weblogic advanced Web Services for JAX-WS Extension
    I am using WebLogic Server Version: 10.3.5.0 installed in production mode and using latest java jdk1.6.0_21. I am getting those option in Windows platform but not on Solaris!!!!
    To resolve this i tried to install Oracle Application Development Runtime 11.1.1.2.xxx (and 11.1.1.3.xxx)
    from http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/downloads/fmw-11-download-092893.html
    But it is also failing giving an error “cannot execute” –
    *./runInstaller: /export/home/weblogic/WEBTIER/Application_Development_Runtime_v12/Disk1/install/solaris/runInstaller: cannot execute*
    Any idea about this error or how to install Oracle WEB TIER on Solaris X86 (64 bit)???
    Thanks,
    Anshul
    Edited by: user13566109 on Apr 2, 2012 3:39 AM

    Hi Cris,
    Thanks for reply. I checked the permission, It was rwxr-xr-x.
    Then I changed to 0777 i.e. to rwxrwxrwx But no effect....
    Do you think that is there any possibility that Application Development Runtime version 11.1.2.0 and 11.1.3.0 are not compatible with Solaris X86- 64 bit environment?
    I downloaded files from http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/downloads/fmw-11-download-092893.html.
    Also I am trying to use 11.1.1.6 from -
    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/adf/downloads/index.html
    Do you have any idea how to install JRF to weblogic?
    I am trying to install this from " Application Development Runtime" or shall I try with "SOA module- ofm_soa_generic_11.1.1.2.0_disk1_1of1"???
    Thanks,
    Anshul

Maybe you are looking for