Instant Access - static sharing of ACLs

Hello
I'm looking to deploy 802.1x/mab on an Instant Access 1000 interface deployment. PACLs/dACLs will be used for security. Many of these ACLs will be identical and I found the following document on static sharing of ACLs to keep tcam utilization down:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12-2SX/configuration/guide/book/dot1x.html#wp1133455
Instant Access parent switch is a C6807-XL (151-2.SY4a) VSS pair using WS-X6904-40G for the IA FEX links
The 6807 doesn't have the commands below (referenced in above document)
mls acl tcam share-acl
platform hardware acl downloadable setup static
I have found the following command on the 6807:
platform feature-manager acl downloadable setup static
Is there an equivalent of "mls acl tcam share-acl" on the C6807-XL (151-2.SY4a) to enable static sharing of ACLs?
Thanks
Andy

Hello.
My understanding is traffic from the inside to lower security interfaces does not require the access-list and access-group command.
That said removing an entire acl removers the access-group command.
apply
access-group acl_inside in interface inside.
I'm not sure if the same applies for other interfaces wishing to access lower security interfaces.
You can consider yourself lucky :)
Tim

Similar Messages

  • How do I change permissions to access a shared file?

    My computer has 2 accounts, mine and my wife. She has a folder with photos. When logged in as my wife, I duplicated that folder and moved the copy to the User>Shared folder. When I log in as myself and access the Shared folder I see the copied folder with the photos but I can't open the photos. Get Info shows that I don't have any permissions. How do I change that? Thanks for any help.
    Owen

    Sometimes, if you highlight an item and use Get Info (or keyboard
    command to generate same item) you can see what user permissions
    on a file are; and as the author or superuser of a computer, you may
    be able to unlock them or give them a different level of general access.
    Since I don't save my images to a specific user account (though my
    own computers have two accounts each) these do not have the same
    permission issues when used between the accounts; and they are
    saved to a file on the hard disk drive accessible to both users directly.
    {This is what the Shared folder is supposed to do; but I don't use iPhoto
    and so this never comes up as a problem in sharing images or exporting.}
    If a user or Admin creates a folder for images, and saves them to the
    hard disk drive location, the other user can see and use them; but
    when there are different user permissions involved, the files have to
    be changed so other users can open them. There should be a way
    to make the change on more than one item at a time.
    Here is a link to another Apple Discussions thread with some information
    which may be of use to you to more streamline the shared folder issue:
    Read/Write Permissions for all users...
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=7944908
    Hopefully this helps; if not, consider each person contributing to folders
    in a generic folder on the hard disk drive you create yourself; so it will
    not be in a Users folder in the first place. You can connect to these by
    putting an alias folder on each of the user's desktops or in their Dock.
    {You could also work around the issue by making more work for yourself,
    in that you can Archive images (save as .zip) images in a folder and
    under one user, those tend to not be user-protected from sharing.}
    Another look at how to: "Share an iPhoto Library in Tiger using ACL's"
    http://ad.hominem.org/log/2005/07/acl.php
    Good luck & happy computing!
    edited.

  • Imlementing synchronized access to shared objects in LabVIEW OOP

    Many objects in object-oriented programming have an
    identity, such as a file, a front-panel object or a hardware device.
    These objects cannot be modelled using present LabVOOP (LabVIEW Object Oriented Programming) objects as
    LabVOOP objects gets copied as wire is branched; multiple different
    wires cannot all represent a single object. This issue has been
    irritating the community of LabVIEW users since the release of LabVOOP
    a few months ago.
    It seems that there is a huge demand for
    objects with unique identity i.e. by-reference objects in LabVIEW. The
    central problem why LabVOOP propably doen't have these objects is the
    difficulty in implementing synchronized access to these objects from
    multiple parallel threads. The problem of synchronized access can be
    divided into two different separate topics. First how the
    sychronization should be implemented in LabVIEW runtime engine. Second
    how this synchronization mechanism should be visible to the developer.
    I'd like to start this thread to discuss these two issues.
    Synhronization under the hood
    Traditionally
    people talk about locking of an object and about get-modify-set pass
    when accessing the object. Locking is traditionally done by acquiring a
    mutex for an object, modifying the object and releasing the mutex so
    that other threads can access the same object instance. This is how
    inter-thread synchronization is traditionally done. However, besides
    the mutex based locking, the computer science community has innovated
    also different kinds of methods on synchronizing the access to objects.
    One way to get object-level synchronization is modify the
    runtime engine so that it only allows a single method of a synchronized
    object to run at any time. This mechanism of syncrhonization is
    implemented in programming languages like O'Haskell, which is a Haskell
    variant with object orirented features.
    Also different
    transactional mechanisms[1,2] have been successful. In transactional
    mechanisms multiple threads are allowed to access a synchronized object
    simultaneously. As each method accessing an object commits their
    changes, they verify that no other object has modified the object
    simultaneously in a manner than would break the transaction. If such a
    modification has occurred, everything is rolled back. Transactional
    mechanism do not suit to every possible situation as not everything can
    be rolled back. For example it's hard to roll back an action that
    somehow modifies the physical world.
    User experience of synchronization
    How
    the synchronization is generally implemented in LabVIEW shouldn't be
    directly visible to the developer end-user. The developer should
    understand the general concepts of synchronization to take full
    advantage of it, but in general the synhronization mechanism should be
    integrated directly to development environment. There should in general
    be no need to acquire a mutex by calling acquire mutex node but instead
    the end-user should be able to specify which data needs synhronized
    access in more sophisticated way.
    In the following I propose a
    mechanism of integrating the synchronized access of by-ref objects to
    the development environemnt of LabVIEW. The proposal is very
    preliminary but I hope it breaks the ice and the community would start
    innovating in how should NI implement the syncrhonization support in
    the user interface of LabVIEW.
    Wire level synchronization
    Only
    methods can access object private data members. In synchronized access
    to the object, it's the methods accessing the private data members that
    need to be synchronized. The private data members are accessed by
    applying unbundle node to the class wire and data is written back to
    the object using bundle node.
    What I propose is the following.
    An unbundle node could either be normal or "synchronized". A
    synchronized unbundle would guarantee the access to the private data
    members in synchronized manner. All data wires originating from
    synchronized unbundle would be of synchronized type, in a little
    similar manner as a dynamic dispatch wire is of special dynamic
    dispatch type. Such a wire must evetually be connected to a bundle
    node. When the wire is bundled back to the originating object, the
    synchronization requirement is released.
    These synchronized
    wires would look somewhat different from normal wires so that the
    developer instantly knows that the wire is synchronized. The developer
    can branch the wire, but only one wire branch can own the synchronized
    type. The developer could easily select which wire would be
    syncrhonized by Ctrl+clicking the wire. Such a wire can be considered
    as a combination of a data and a mutex, even though mutexes don't need
    to be the underlying synchronization method. The wire just guarantees
    that there is a mechanism in the runtime engine that makes sure the
    access to the wire data is synchronized.
    There is a need to wire
    data originating from a non-synchronized wire to a synchronized wire so
    that it can replace the private data member of the class. This is
    accomplished with a new node similar to bundle node, that would allow
    replacing the data in a syncrhonized wire with some data originating
    from a non-synchronized wire.
    The synchronized wire can be
    connected to a front panel controls of special syncrhonized type. This
    way the synchronized wire can originate from a method and allow passing
    the synchronized data to the calling VI and back to another method.
    This is practical for example in a situation when the developer wants
    to run different analyzes to a data class but don't want to rewrite all
    the existing data analysis tools as class members. So the developers
    writes a syncrhonization acquiring getData method that let's the
    calling VI to access the syncrhonized data. Then the developer passes
    this data to an analysis VI and passes the result back to a setData
    method that writes the result back to the class wire.
    There
    will probably be technical problems in allowing the user to connect
    such a synchronized wire to all existing VIs since these VIs. Therefore
    the programming model for all nodes that do not support such
    synchronized wires will be branching the wire and passing the
    non-synchronized wire branch to the node and then bundling the result
    back to the synchronized wire.
    To increase performance and
    decrease unnecessary buffer copies when a syncrhonized wire is
    branched, if the syncrhonized wire continues directly to the new bundle
    synchronized wire node, no buffer copy is made.
    Discussion
    The
    syncrhonized access to a by-ref LabVOOP objects can be implemented in
    multiple ways by National Instruments. The synchronized access should
    be divided to two different and independent parts: 1) the user
    experience of synchronization and 2) the runtime engine synchronization
    mechanisms. As LabVOOP objects have special properties compared to
    other LabVIEW data types, optimal user experience can be gained by
    designing the user experience specifically for LabVOOP objects. From
    user experience point-of-view this syncrhonization mechanism may not
    work for other data types. Separating object syncrhonization from
    synchronization of other data types is advantageous also for other
    reasons. Due to the fact that object data can only be accessed via
    object methods, more advanced synchronization methods may be used with
    objects than can be used with other data types. O'Haskell
    synchronization implementation is an example of this. Integrating the
    synchronization directly to the user interface allows NI to change the
    mehcanisms under the hood, when computer science comes up with more
    advanced methods. Therefore NI could begin with traditional and quite
    easy mutex-based synchronization and later move to more advanced
    perhaps transaction based syncrhonization methods or even combinations
    of multiple different methods.
    I hope this topic generates
    discussion that would help NI to implement an excellent synchronization
    mechanism in LabVOOP. I hope that all talented individuals in the
    community participate this discussion to help NI to reach this goal. I
    also hope that if you just have time, it would be great if you could
    surf the computer science resources to find out what kinds of new
    techniques there exists for synchronizing access to shared resources. A
    Large community may find much more innovative solutions than a few engineers at NI. Let's give NI the power of open source design
    Tomi Maila

    Hello Tomi,
    First, thank you for taking the time to write such a well
    though-out suggestion.  Are you familiar
    with the “LabVIEW Object-Oriented Programming: The Decisions Behind the Design”
    document?  I think the reason we chose to implement a ‘by
    value’ strategy, is that is more in line with the LabVIEW programming paradigm
    of dataflow, and would make sense to most of our LabVIEW users.
    I think your suggestion is interesting, and it does
    highlight the need to think outside of the conventional LabVIEW box and look to
    some of the innovative things other languages do.  However, I think we all agree that
    synchronization takes careful planning and extra work for the programmer.  Even with an ‘ideal’ solution I see no way
    around this.  For LabVIEW users today,
    one great way to get synchronized ‘by reference’ semantics with your objects is
    to use a single-element queue to pass your object.  The queue itself is passed ‘by reference’ and
    is inherently synchronized!  The does
    have the disadvantage of adding one more small layer of complexity to your
    program, but some complexity would have to be introduced in any situation.  The other disadvantage with this is that it
    is not always an intuitive way to implement your program and requires some
    amount of LabVIEW knowledge before one would generally come across this
    technique.
    In any case, I appreciate the time and effort you put in to
    your suggestion.  Please make sure that
    you submit the suggestion formally through the NI Product Suggestion Center so
    that it can be reviewed by some of the decision makers here.
    Thanks again,
    Travis M
    LabVIEW R&D
    National Instruments

  • HT201301 Can't access PDFs shared to Kindle app

    I can't access PDFs shared through iTunes on my Kindle app on ipod touch - they don't appear. Have used file sharing successfully with Pages, so can't figure out why this won't work ;/

    We are doing this without issue. You neglect to specify the errors seen on both sides, and how you are trying to gain access.
    The issue is that your are most likely NOT being prompted for credentials. Use the NET USE command supplying the proper user ID and Password to create the drive letter. And a couple things you MUST do: Disable Op Locks on the SAMBA server. Here are snippet from a working /etc/samba/smb.conf for our grpwise share. And disable the rest of the samba shares ( login, etc... ) these should be commended out in your smb.conf. So in the end you should have a [global] section and a section for your share.
    Code:
    [grpwise]
    comment = Transfer
    inherit acls = Yes
    path = /grpwise
    read only = No
    oplocks = False
    level2oplocks = False
    From the W2K8 server...
    net use G: \\10.10.10.123\grpwise * /user:root /savecred /persistent:yes
    * means "Prompt for Password" Oh Horrors! Using the SuSE boxes root user! You can avoid that by provisioning a user in SLES and then creating them a SAMBA password ( Google is your friend ) and then you can use that user / password. Now you will have a persistent drive what should come back.
    -- Bob

  • Setting up two separate networks with access to shared resources

    Hi all,
    We have a two separate businesses in the same building who will both need access to shared resources and the same internet connection. They will need to remain on separate subnets and cannot communicate directly to each other. The current switch is a Cisco ESW-520-48P and we are looking at purchasing an SG-300-20P for the new business moving in. Heres how we envisage setting it up:
    ESW-520 will host Company A's network. Workstations, servers etc
    SG-300 will have two VLANS. VLAN1 will host all Company B's network. Workstations, servers etc. VLAN2 will host the shared resources such as printers.
    The internet gateway is a UNIX based system with 3 NICS. 2 NICS are taken up by ADSL connections while the other NIC is the LAN, which would connect to VLAN2 on the SG-300. We would like to define which ADSL connection to route through depending on which subnet traffic is originating.
    The ESW-520 will need access to the shared resources and internet gateway on VLAN2 on the SG-300.
    Will this be possible with these two switches? Would this be the best way to go about it?
    Appreciate any recommendations you can provide.
    Thanks,
    Tom

    Hi Tom,
    Thanks for confirming that. The SG-300 will be set in layer 3 mode. In regards to the ESW-520, will this just connect to one of the VLAN2 ports on the SG-300?
    The default gateway for devices in Company A's network will be the ESW-520, which will have a static route to the VLAN2 subnet.
    The default gateway for devices in Company B's network will be VLAN2 IP on the SG-300.
    Does this sound correct?
    Also as long as there are no routes setup between Company A and Company B's subnets, there won't be any traffic passing through such as DHCP acks etc?
    Thanks again,
    Tom

  • Restrict workgroup computers in accessing my shared folder

    How to restrict workgroup computers in accessing my shared folder.
    And only allow a specific system in the workgroup to have full control access to that shared folder.
    Operating System :Windows Server 2003

    Hi Tiju,
    You cannot restrict access to a folder using computer accounts. The access to the share folder can only giving to everyone or local accounts if the network environment is
    Workgroup.
    Because the computer account never tries to access the shared folders. The access attempt is made by the user account; and if the user account isn't in the ACL of the file, he won't get access.
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/57739cb5-ec63-403d-b2c5-3949d440a845/restrict-access-to-network-folder-in-workgroup?forum=w7itpronetworking
    Regards,
    Rafic
    If you found this post helpful, please give it a "Helpful" vote.
    If it answered your question, remember to mark it as an "Answer".
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and confers no rights! Always test ANY suggestion in a test environment before implementing!

  • Accessing static context from instances...

    Hello,
    I'm confused with something. Accessing static elemnts or static methods from an instance is allowed. I think it shouldn't be allowed. Because static context is class-wide so objects shouldn't be able to access them.
    Am I wrong..?

    I find it confusing.. If something is class-wide then
    it should only be accessed by the class, not the
    instance of the class...That depends on the nature or purpose of the information. Static information or methods are a useful way of sharing information between instances of the same class, while still having that information protected from other classes. Other examples are constants which are used within each instance. Why should each instance have a separate copy of exactly the same constant?
    You could even argue that any method which does not need any instance information should be declared static, but it is not always necessary to make that distinction.
    Eclipse (mine at least :) ) gives a warning when you access a static
    method/variable 'through' an instance, telling you that you should access >the method/variable in a static way.This warning usually occurs if you call a static method in a non static way. For example, if you declare a class called MyClass with a static method myMethod() and you have an instance assigned to variable anInstance, you should call the method using MyClass.myMethod() instead of anInstance.myMethod().
    Graeme

  • I have an Ipad 2 and here is what I am trying to accomplish.  On my laptop I connect to a remote desktop connection to access a shared program we use for reporting.  How do I set up my Ipad to access this remote server?  Thanks for the help.

    I have an Ipad 2 and here is what I am trying to accomplish.  On my laptop I connect to a remote desktop connection to access a shared program we use for reporting.  How do I set up my Ipad to access this remote server?  Thanks for the help.

    Close ... before going for a specific Cisco app ... lets find out some details:
    Host we need more details:
    What is your server environment (Windows Server, or Mac OS X Server, or Linux)?
    What security is implemented in your environment - as what is restricted (RDP for all or specifc credentials on all machines? Are you part of local admin group to the server you wish to connect)?
    Does your environment Support CISCO IPSec connection? If so use Settings> VPN and IPSec tab to enter VPN details, if not then go with above suggestion. IF your restricted to RSA then either built in VPN settings or 3rd party app for RSA would suffice.
    Finally, there are many RDP applications out there I use "Mocha RDP Light" (free minimal ads when launched not when connecting).

  • I'm trying to set up Family Sharing. My settings show that the people I chose are there but I don't see any shared information. How do I access the shared info?

    I'm trying to set up Family Sharing. My settings show that the people I chose are there but I don't see any shared information. How do I access the shared info? All computers are using Yosemite 10.10.1 and are new 13" MacBook Pros.

    Hi wmcknigh,
    Welcome to Apple Support Communities.
    The article below should help you resolve the issue with shared content not appearing after setting up Family sharing on the MacBook Pros.
    If you don't see your family's shared content - Apple Support
    Cheers,
    -Jason

  • My wife an I share one iTunes account but have separate Apple id for our devices - prior to 8.1 we shared storage on iCloud now we can't and when I try to buy more storage on her phone instead of accessing the shared iTunes account it try's to sign

    MMy wife an I share one iTunes account but have separate Apple id for our devices - prior to 8.1 we shared storage on iCloud now we can't and when I try to buy more storage on her phone instead of accessing the shared iTunes account it try's to sign in to iTunes using her Apple id - I checked the iTunes id and password on both devices - can anyone help

    Have a look here...
    http://macmost.com/setting-up-multiple-ios-devices-for-messages-and-facetime.htm l

  • On iTunes 11, how can I access home sharing if the music is from a CD? Is there any way I can download these songs if (A) I no longer have the CD, or (B) I do not want to pay $25 a year for iTunes Match?

    On iTunes 11, how can I access home sharing if the music is from a CD on a different computer using Home Sharing? Is there any way I can download these songs if (A) I no longer have the CD, or (B) I do not want to pay $25 a year for iTunes Match?

    Yes, you can copy songs that you ripped from a CD to your Home Sharing computer.
    Turn on Home Sharing first on both computers.  To do that, go to File > Home Sharing > Turn on Home Sharing.  Enter your Apple ID and password.
    Now go to your computer that you want to copy the songs to and connect to your Home Share.  You can do that by clicking on the popover button located at the left top corner right below the play control buttons.  Click on it and scroll to the bottom until you see your Home Share and select it.
    Go to Music in your Home Share.  Select the songs that you want to copy in your Home Share and click Import at the bottom right corner.

  • Unable to change members of AD security groups who have access to shared mailboxes

    I have an exchange 2013 running for over a year now and never had any problems with it. Until recently.
    A request came in to make a new shared mailbox. So I did just that and gave rights to a security (not mail enabled) AD group. Just like I Always do. Everything worked fine. A few hours later I did exactly the same for another request and then the people
    could not access the shared mailbox. So I added my regular user to the AD group and I also couldn't (I tested it with OWA and Outlook). I tried to remove myself of one of my own shared mailboxes and the permissions wouldn't stick. When I removed the entire
    group then the permissions were gone(and I could not access the shared mailbox). When I added it back I had my permissions back but still wasn't in the group. Then I tried adding a distribution group with the same result.
    It seems when I add normal users directly to the permissions everything works.
    When I had to restart the server a few days later. All changes were applied but I could not change it again.
    i'm a bit stumped on this one. i'm out of options.

    Hi Jelle,
    "I did exactly the same for another request and then the people could not access the shared mailbox.", I would like to verify if you give the same Security Group rights to multiple shared mailboxes.
    If the security group members can't have access to all the shared mailboxes they have rights, you can recreate a security group and grant permissions to shared mailboxes one by one to check the result.
    Hope this can be helpful to you.
    Best regards,
    Amy Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Can no longer access Acrobat shared review server

    Hello. We are using Acrobat 8, and yesterday I discovered that I can recreate a lost shared-review PDF by generating a new PDF, and then copying the comment-repository XML files from the original review PDF to the folder belonging to the new review PDF.  That was great, but I wanted other staff members to not fiddle with the XML files, so I set that folder (named "meta") to read-only.  It was previously shared and set to full-access for everybody.
    Today, I found that nobody had access to their shared reviews anymore, so I hastily reset the access to the "meta" folder back to full-access, and I re-shared the "meta" folder for everybody.  It isn't helping.  No-one can access their shared reviews.
    Note: immediately after I recreated that lost PDF, one of the reviewers added several comments and uploaded them to the server, so I know everything was working fine then.  I set the "meta" folder to read-only sometime later, and I think that's what caused the problem.
    Any ideas?
    I've just now tried posting a new shared-review PDF, but this time I created a new shared-review folder location, pointing to the exact same actual network folder.  The only thing different between the two connections is the descriptive names attached to the connections, which appear in the drop-down list of locations.  The original connection's descriptive name is "Acrobat Server" (named by one of my colleagues) and the new one I left unchanged from the default descriptive name "My Network Folder".  This new shared-review PDF works fine, so I know that access to the "meta" folder is fine, but how can I fix the older review PDFs?
    A workaround for my problem is therefore to re-post all the currently active shared-review PDFs, using the "My Network Folder" connection, and then copy the XML files to the new PDF.  I just tried it, and it works, but that's only a practical workaround to fix the 10 to 15 recently posted review PDFs, and it'll only work if people still have the original PDFs they posted.  All the older review PDFs will still be read-only.
    Also, does anyone know how to remove a folder location so that only the one that works appears in the drop-down list?
    Updates:
    1) The above workaround only works for me.  Other reviewers still cannot access the new PDF.    So I don't have a valid workaround after all.
    2) One more thing: if I try to post a new PDF using the old location "Acrobat Server", it fails at the step where it tries to create the XML file and folder.
    3) Earlier, I also tried creating a new shared-review folder location in another directory, and I noticed that the metadata folder was not shared.  So maybe I don't need to share the "meta" folder after all, and maybe something changed in our corporate network overnight?

    Thank you for your answer.
    I have narrowed my problem down to a connectivity problem with the comment server.  We have Acrobat 8 installed on a machine named "acrobat".  On the acrobat machine, the shared-review PDFs are stored in a folder named "documents".  Each member of our team has a subfolder within the documents folder.  i.e. this structure:
    documents
         john
         jane
         david
         amy
    The comment server XML files are stored in a folder named "meta", at the same level as the above name folders:
    documents
         john
         jane
         david
         amy
         meta
    When we send documentation out for review, we send reviewers a link something like "\\acrobat\john\123_review.pdf".  Reviewers are able to open the PDF, but they get an error message saying "Adobe Reader cannot connect to the Review Server: acrobat".
    I believe that the message means that Reader is not able to find the comment server in the "meta" folder.  But the meta folder is definitely there, and is write-accessible for everyone.  Any user on our network is able to manually open the meta folder, create a new file inside the folder, edit and save that file, delete the file, etc.
    These pdfs that no longer work, always used to work.  I had changed permissions on the meta folder, but after people reported connectivity problems, I changed the permissions back to full control for all users, and even added more users with full control, but people still can't connect.  What I need is to find out where these PDFs are looking for the comment server.  It looks like they're looking in the correct place: the acrobat machine, but maybe inside the PDFs, the comment server location is stored in a certain way.
    Another thing: when anybody tries to initiate a shared review, the process fails at the point where Acrobat 8 tries to create a comment server folder.  The person who set up Acrobat 8 for us also defined the shared-review location for us (a drop-down box containing all locations appears in the first or second screen of the dialog box when you initiate a shared review.  Only one location appears for us: the location defined by that person, and it's named "acrobat server").  But I don't know how to find out what that shared-review location is. Acrobat 8 lets you remove a location, but doesn't let you edit it.  If I could see what the location is, I could see if the path is somehow defined irregularly.  e.g. without the fully qualified domain name or something like that.
    I subsequently added another location, "my network folder", and pointed it to the same meta folder.  The "my network folder" location works for me.  I can post a shared review, and it connects to the comment server properly.  But this works only for me: when other users open that same shared review pdf, they get the "cannot connect" error message above.  Again, if I could see explicitly how "my network folder" is saved in Acrobat, and also see how the PDF file has stored that location, I could see if there's a mismatch.

  • How can I access a shared drive in window?

    Hi
    I have connected a 320GB hard drive to my Airport Extreme and it is all great. I can access it from my MacBook Air but when going onto Windows I cannot see it? I have tried the 'Map Network Drive' about 50 times and it never works! When looking on Airport Utility (on Windows) and I see it. I've looked at other discussions but they keep on going on about AEPS and such that I have no idea about! Could someone give me a step by step instructions on how to access my shared drive?
    Thanks

    Mounting using AirPort Base Station Agent
    Launch the AirPort Base Station Agent from C:\\Program Files\AirPort\
    Ensure that the task bar menu is enabled from AirPort Disks
    Click the AirPort Base Station Agent icon in the Taskbar
    Enter the user name and password
    Mounting by mapping a Network Drive
    Go to My Computer (Start > My Computer)
    From the menu, pull down Tools and select "Map Network Drive"
    Enter a drive letter that is not in use (for example, "Z")
    Enter the path to the drive. This is formatted as: \\IPaddress\drivename (for example, \\10.0.1.1\mydrive)
    Mounting using Server Connection
    Select Start > Run and enter the IP address of the AirPort Extreme Base Station (802.11n). (by default \\10.0.1.1)
    When prompted, enter a username and password
    A window will open containing folders for each hard drive connected to the AirPort Extreme Base Station (802.11n)

  • How do I access a shared icloud calendar from a PC

    We have a friend with an ipad locked down so they cant add other apps.  They have a calendar they have shared with my gmail address.  the share email says I HAVE to have an icloud account to view the shared calendar so I signed up.  I can log in to icloud on the web but have no apps.  I downloaded icloud for windows but when I try to run it says my id is a valid apple ID but NOT an icloud account....  AUUUGH

    Hi visit wicksoft.com we have just released our exchange iOS client. Secure access to shared calendar, contacts, public folders and delegate mailboxes.
    The mobile client is in the AppStore but we'll need to send you the server client...contact me [email protected]

Maybe you are looking for