Insurance company replacing my Mac Pro with MacBook aluminium...

I recently smashed the screen of my MacBook Pro. Apple quoted me around £300 to replace the screen and casing.
I then sent it off to get repaired by the Insurance company who have come back saying it is "beyond economic repair" (I find that hard to believe) so they are replacing my late 2011 model MacBook Pro with an aluminium MacBook (I'd never heard of them).
My main concern is that I'm being given an old model MacBook to replace a MBP which was in good condition other than a cracked screen. Does this sound right?
The insurance company have said the MB aluminium has higher specs than my MBP did...I don't know if I believe this either.
Any light shed would be greatly appreciated.

The latest MacBook made of aluminum is the late 2008 model. It was discontinued in June 2009. It lacks any FireWire ports, which any MacBook Pro would have. You do not say what size display your MBP had but none of the MacBooks are anything but 13". The MBP supports up to 8GB of RAM, the MacBook only 4GB. The Late 2011 MBP supports Tunderbolt digital video output, the MacBook does not. The list goes on and on. This is not an even trade they are offering.
Best of luck.

Similar Messages

  • I just replaced my mac pro with an iMac and i can't get it to work with my epson stylus 3800 printer?

    i just replaced my mac pro with an iMac and i can't get it to work with my epson stylus 3800 printer? i have downloaded the 3800 software three times and the imac keeps telling me there is no software to run the printer? Any help here?

    Care to share which OS you are using?

  • Replacing a Mac Pro with a 2012 Mac mini?

    Has anyone replaced their Mac Pro with a 2012 Mac mini? If so, are you happy with your decision?

    I had the mini fitted with a SSD by Apple. Apple use the Samsung 830 and that is very capable and the price difference was not worth the effort of installing the SSD. Where installing memory is as easy as it could ever be replacing the hard disk is mind bendingly frustrating. You might think from videos such as this
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13wcKCYo_Xw
    that it is a simple procedure. What they dont tell you is that this man has freakishly tiny hands. In the real world the job reminds me of disassembling mechanical wrist watches. You need a variety of specialized tools or its just not happening. And there is no soothing music.
    Also the video above misses a critical step. The antenna grate will not fit back into position unless a hook like tool is used to go through a specific hole in the grate and pull up from under whilst applying a pressure in the necessary horizontal direction.
    So my advice is not to install your own HDD/SSD. The memory I used was from Crucial because Crucial is the retail side of Micron who provides Apple their memory for the mac minis.
    http://www.crucial.com/upgrade/Apple-memory/Mac+mini/Mac+mini+%28Late+2012%29-up grades.html
    Having heard of memory failures in AHD from different manufacturers and read about the need for 3.35v DDR3L I ran what I got from Crucial through 6 cycles of the advanced AHD, taking about 10 hours. No failures.
    I am running Parallels and under various virtual machines running simultaneously I have intensive CADs, IDEs, and all the latest games on steam maxed out on a 30 inch display, without lag or any noticeable loading time at all. It is by far the fastest machine I have used. Very impressed.

  • My insurance company replaced my stolen iphone 4s with a brand new one,will the apple store allow me to exchange it for a iphone 5 and pay the difference in price ?

    My insurance company replaced my stolen iphone 4S with a new one, will the apple store allow me to exchange it for an iphone 5 and pay the price difference?

    The Apple Support Communities are an international user to user technical support forum. As a man from Mexico, Spanish is my native tongue. I do not speak English very well, however, I do write in English with the aid of the Mac OS X spelling and grammar checks. I also live in a culture perhaps very very different from your own. When offering advice in the ASC, my comments are not meant to be anything more than helpful and certainly not to be taken as insults.
    You would need to ask that directly to Apple. Apple is not here nor does Apple answer questions here.
    To return an iOS product requires a valid receipt. You have 30 days to return an iPhone. The iPhone must have all original packaging & accessories and be in new condition. Apple may charge a restocking fee on a returned iPhone.
    If the iPhone was bought from a 3rd party, their regulations for returns would apply.

  • Hi! is it possible that Logic X has upgrades that work only with mavericks and does t work in mountain lion....since in my macbook pro with mavericks i have new views of the equalizer, etc and in my mac pro with mountain lion it still the old view...

    Hi! is it possible that Logic X has upgrades that work only with mavericks and does t work in mountain lion....since in my macbook pro with mavericks i have new views of the equalizer, etc and in my mac pro with mountain lion it still the old view...

    Any OS version of 10.8.4 or later has all features that are not OS depended. The plugins are one example. You probably haven't updated all versions of Logic Pro X to the latest one.

  • Looking to replace my Mac Pro 2.1 graphics card with one that is silent with at least 2 DVI outputs (needed for audio production), any recommendations?

    Looking to replace my Mac Pro 2.1 graphics card with one that is silent with at least 2 DVI outputs (needed for audio production), any recommendations?
    Thanks

    Thanks, but are these are silent?
    Why do they cost over 10 x what seems available for PC?
    Is it not possible to flash the cards for mac?
    Something similar to a ASUS Geforce 8400GS PCI-E 2.0 512 MB DDR2 Graphics Card EN8400GS Silent/P/512M?

  • Mac Pro with Lion had hard drive replaced, left me with 10.5

    My late 2007 Mac Pro with Lion had hard drive replaced by Genius Bar at Short Pump, VA, Apple Store. They left me with 10.5, I have gotten back to 10.6.8 but how can I get back to Lion? Any tips? On-line advice to hold OPTION key down while clicking "purchases" doesn't work. The 2007 Mac Pro can't take Mountain Lion. Am I stuck with Snow Leopard?

    Don't know what OS I was at when I saw the purchase, but there was no install button and the layout of the app store was weird. I had over 100 apps there for my ipad, and it let me download them all, but not Lion. Now that I am finally up to 10.6.8, I only see 4 apps, not Lion. One (iphoto) ironically says "requires OS X v10.7". Where is Lion now? It is not there in my purchased list, whether I hold "option" while pressing "purchases" or not.

  • Can I use my old AIr Port Extreme with my new Mac Pro with Lion installed? It has worked well with the G-4 that I'm replacing.

    Can I use my old Airport Exteme with my new Mac Pro with Lion installed? It has worked well for years with my G-4.

    I'm smarter now. It worked fine.

  • HT201364 i have a mac pro with os x 10.6.8  why can't install a mavericks on him ?

    i have a Mac Pro with processor Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor speed 3 GHz number of processor 2 memory ram 2gb why can' not make a upgrade to mavericks OS X Mavericks 10.9.2 ?

    To install Mavericks, you need one of these Macs:
    iMac (Mid-2007 or later)
    MacBook (13-inch Aluminum, Late 2008), (13-inch, Early 2009 or later)
    MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid-2009 or later),
    MacBook Pro (15-inch or 17-inch, Mid/Late 2007 or later)
    MacBook Air (Late 2008 or later)
    Mac mini (Early 2009 or later)
    Mac Pro (Early 2008 or later)
    Xserve (Early 2009)
    Your Mac also needs:
    OS X Mountain Lion, Lion, or Snow Leopard v10.6.8 already installed
    2 GB or more of memory
    8 GB or more of available space

  • Last Mac Pro with Firewire 400?

    The new Mac Pro's look nice, but without Firewire 400 they're useless to me... Can anyone tell me when the last Mac Pro with Firewire 400 was released?...and what the speeds were on them? Thanks in advance if anyone can help.

    Fair points, to be sure. I just think that, given the number of common/popular devices that are FW400 only, the removal of FW400 ports is a bit premature at this time. Like the OP said, it would be frustrating to buy a very expensive computer, and immediately have to expand in order to make use of fairly standard and not yet out-dated gear.
    Dave Sawyer wrote:
    Sorry to disagree, but to me, expecting a company to go to the expense of engineering in a different physical port just to save someone from having to use a simple, inexpensive cable adaptor seems a bit silly.
    It couldn't be that hard/expensive, given that previous models had both. Though I certainly understand the idea of reducing cost wherever possible.

  • Why does Indesign CS4 stall on my Mac Pro with Snow Leopard as soon as I load a file?

    I recently bought a Mac Pro (operating system: Snow Leopard) and installed the latest versions of Photoshop and InDesign (both CS4). I also installed those programmes on my older MacBook Pro with the former (Leopard) operating system.
    Photoshop works just fine on the Mac Pro, with the machine's new Snow Leopard operating system. However, there is a problem with InDesign. Everytime I open a file, even opening a new file, the programme is stalling and I have to force-stop it.
    Does anyone out there in the Adobe Community have a similar problem and could suggest a solution?
    Looking thankfully forward to interesting replies!  Emil

    I first installed the next to last version; the problem appeared there
    (programme stalling as soon as a document is opened). I then updated to
    6.04, hoping for a solution, but the problem remained unresolved. I still
    cannot open a document without stalling InDesign. When installing InDesign
    in my MacBook Pro (which runs Leopard), the problem does not arise. I am
    able to open documents there and work as usual. The operative system was
    installed by the supplier of the machine. Since I was not able to access it
    (Password issues), I reinstalled it by booting the MacPro from the disquette
    that was delivered together with the machine.
    HELP! I am getting desparate!

  • Mac Pro with OS 10.5.8 ?

    I am running a Mac Pro with OS 10.5.8 and Dual Core Intel Xeon processors, 4mb Ram, 5gb memory. I want to install 64 bit Windows 7 Professional and run it through Bootcamp or Parallels. I have BootCamp running on the machine with Windows XP, but am looking at the possibilties.
    Am I out of luck here?
    Thanks deanfromnc

    If you already have XP installed via BootCamp, then you can upgrade the computer to Snow Leopard or Lion in order to install Win7. If you have a 2006 or 2007 Mac Pro then you cannot run 64-bit Win7 via Boot Camp, but you could using Parallels.
    Upgrading to Snow Leopard, Lion, or Mountain Lion
    You can upgrade to Mountain Lion from Lion or directly from Snow Leopard. Mountain Lion can be downloaded from the Mac App Store for $19.99. To access the App Store you must have Snow Leopard 10.6.6 or later installed.
    Upgrading to Snow Leopard
    You must purchase Snow Leopard through the Apple Store: Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard - Apple Store (U.S.). The price is $19.99 plus tax. You will be sent physical media by mail after placing your order.
    After you install Snow Leopard you will have to download and install the Mac OS X 10.6.8 Update Combo v1.1 to update Snow Leopard to 10.6.8 and give you access to the App Store. Access to the App Store enables you to download Mountain Lion if your computer meets the requirements.
         Snow Leopard General Requirements
           1. Mac computer with an Intel processor
           2. 1GB of memory
           3. 5GB of available disk space
           4. DVD drive for installation
           5. Some features require a compatible Internet service provider;
               fees may apply.
           6. Some features require Apple’s MobileMe service; fees and
               terms apply.
    Upgrading to Lion
    If your computer does not meet the requirements to install Mountain Lion, it may still meet the requirements to install Lion.
    You can purchase Lion by contacting Customer Service: Contacting Apple for support and service - this includes international calling numbers. The cost is $19.99 (as it was before) plus tax.  It's a download. You will get an email containing a redemption code that you then use at the Mac App Store to download Lion. Save a copy of that installer to your Downloads folder because the installer deletes itself at the end of the installation.
         Lion System Requirements
           1. Mac computer with an Intel Core 2 Duo, Core i3, Core i5, Core i7,
               or Xeon processor
           2. 2GB of memory
           3. OS X v10.6.6 or later (v10.6.8 recommended)
           4. 7GB of available space
           5. Some features require an Apple ID; terms apply.
    Upgrading to Mountain Lion
    To upgrade to Mountain Lion you must have Snow Leopard 10.6.8 or Lion installed. Purchase and download Mountain Lion from the App Store. Sign in using your Apple ID. Mountain Lion is $19.99 plus tax. The file is quite large, over 4 GBs, so allow some time to download. It would be preferable to use Ethernet because it is nearly four times faster than wireless.
         OS X Mountain Lion - System Requirements
           Macs that can be upgraded to OS X Mountain Lion
             1. iMac (Mid 2007 or newer)
             2. MacBook (Late 2008 Aluminum, or Early 2009 or newer)
             3. MacBook Pro (Mid/Late 2007 or newer)
             4. MacBook Air (Late 2008 or newer)
             5. Mac mini (Early 2009 or newer)
             6. Mac Pro (Early 2008 or newer)
             7. Xserve (Early 2009)
         Are my applications compatible?
             See App Compatibility Table - RoaringApps.
         Am I eligible for the free upgrade?
             See Apple - Free OS X Mountain Lion upgrade Program.
         For a complete How-To introduction from Apple see Upgrade to OS X Mountain Lion.

  • 2010 Mac Pro with Apple RAID card - "Drive carrier 00:03 removed"

    I've got a 2010 Mac Pro with the Apple RAID card and 4 internal identical Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB drives inside.
    I've never had a problem with the RAID card (either battery or in operation) except for one thing:
    Almost every time I shut the machine down (which I try to do as rarely as possible), it keeps losing Drive 3, the spare.
    (See RAID Utility event log snippet below.)
    [I wish I could understand why this Apple RAID card keeps losing the spare across power-cycles/reboots, but I digress.]
    So I just adopted it as the spare and it spawns the rebuild and many hours later, everything's fine again.
    ... until the last time I rebooted (Jan. 2nd).
    After the usual "I lost the spare" message upon login, it began the rebuild.
    But this time, about 11 1/2 hours later the rebuild stopped and RAID Utility reported "Drive carrier 00:03 removed".
    Bay 3 is now missing in the Controller view.
    I powered off the system last night, and left it off overnight.  Today I took all the drives out, blew the dust off and reseated them.
    Same thing.  Drive 3 is still missing, and now the rebuild task aborted.
    The drive bay location shouldn't matter, right?  Can I swap the Bay 3 drive with the Bay 4 drive?
    I figure one of two things would happen:
    (1) It will report Bay 3 as being there but Bay 4 as being missing, same situation as is now.  Meaning the problem is in the Bay 3 spare drive.
    (2) It will report Bay 3 as being missing (despite a 'good' drive being present) and Bay 4 will be the (unattached) spare, and the RAID set will be unviable.  Meaning the problem is with the drive bay itself, not whatever drive is plugged into it.
    If "Drive carrier removed" is trying to tell me the disk is bad, why do I not see any log messages about it?  I suppose a spare that never gets used could go bad from lack of use, but ... no messages at all?
    Hesitant to plunk down $160 on a new spare disk if the present one isn't actually dead ...
    % sudo raidutil list raidsetinfo
                                         Total     Avail
    Raidsets      Type       Drives       Size      Size  Comments
    RS1           RAID 5     1,2,4      5.23TB    0.00MB  Rebuild: 0% complete            
    % sudo raidutil list driveinfo
    Drives  Raidset       Size      Flags
    Bay #1  RS1             2.00TB   IsMemberOfRAIDSet:RS1 IsReliable
    Bay #2  RS1             2.00TB   IsMemberOfRAIDSet:RS1 IsReliable
    Bay #4  RS1             2.00TB   IsMemberOfRAIDSet:RS1 IsReliable
    Event log snippet:
    Saturday, January 11, 2014 8:15:19 AM PT
    Background task aborted: Task=Rebuild,Scope=DRVGRP,Group=RS1
    informational
    Friday, January 3, 2014 3:50:28 AM PT
    Drive carrier 00:03 removed
    informational
    Thursday, January 2, 2014 4:29:37 PM PT
    Marked drive in bay 3 as a global spare
    informational
    Thursday, January 2, 2014 4:29:28 PM PT
    Adopted drive in bay 3
    informational
    Thursday, January 2, 2014 4:28:34 PM PT
    Degraded RAID set RS1 - No spare available for rebuild
    critical
    Saturday, December 7, 2013 5:35:17 PM PT
    Marked drive in bay 3 as a global spare
    informational
    Saturday, December 7, 2013 5:35:08 PM PT
    Adopted drive in bay 3
    informational
    Saturday, December 7, 2013 5:34:11 PM PT
    The "RedundancyScrub" command could not be executed. (Invalid request or invalid parameter in the request.)
    warning
    Saturday, December 7, 2013 5:34:03 PM PT
    Degraded RAID set RS1 - No spare available for rebuild
    critical
    Friday, December 6, 2013 4:56:47 AM PT
    Battery finished conditioning
    informational
    Thursday, December 5, 2013 9:53:44 PM PT
    Battery started scheduled conditioning cycle (write cache disabled)
    informational
    Friday, September 6, 2013 10:53:11 PM PT
    Battery finished conditioning
    informational
    Friday, September 6, 2013 3:41:33 PM PT
    Battery started scheduled conditioning cycle (write cache disabled)
    informational
    Saturday, June 8, 2013 3:41:35 PM PT
    Battery finished conditioning
    informational
    Saturday, June 8, 2013 8:37:49 AM PT
    Battery started scheduled conditioning cycle (write cache disabled)
    informational
    Thursday, May 30, 2013 4:09:51 PM PT
    Marked drive in bay 3 as a global spare
    informational
    Thursday, May 30, 2013 4:09:42 PM PT
    Adopted drive in bay 3
    informational
    Thursday, May 30, 2013 4:08:59 PM PT
    Degraded RAID set RS1 - No spare available for rebuild
    critical
    Thursday, May 30, 2013 3:32:29 PM PT
    Degraded RAID set RS1
    warning

    Power Pig wrote:
    "Hesitant to plunk down $160 on a new spare disk if the present one isn't actually dead ...
    % sudo raidutil list raidsetinfo
                                         Total     Avail
    Raidsets      Type       Drives       Size      Size  Comments
    RS1           RAID 5     1,2,4      5.23TB    0.00MB  Rebuild: 0% complete     
    I was talking about this.
    This looks like a RAID 5 setup without the parity to me. I would said it basically a RAID 0.
    Also you metioned "I guess that previous spare must really have gone 'bad', despite having never been used! "
    I wiped everything out, I selected the 3 disks and clicked on "Create RAID Set" with RAID5 selected and the "Use unassigned drives as spares" option checked.  The 3rd disk has always been marked as the spare ever since then.  You do not have a choice to create a "RAID5 setup without the parity".  If I wanted a RAID0 I would have chosen a RAID0!  raidutil now says
    % sudo raidutil list raidsetinfo
                                         Total     Avail
    Raidsets      Type       Drives       Size      Size  Comments
    RS1           RAID 5     1,2,3,4    5.23TB    0.00MB  No tasks running
    Every time the system would 'lose' Drive 3 on boot, I would just keep rebooting until it was 'found', and then manually re-assign the now-'floating' drive as the spare - and the RAID would rebuild.
    There was never a problem until the day that prompted this post - when it would not find Drive 3 no matter what I did.  I turned the Mac Pro off for several hours until the drives had all cooled down and it still did not find the drive.  I left the machine on but unmounted the degraded volume until I got the new replacement drive.
    I really don't understand what you are getting at. It's like you are trying to tell me I set it up as a 4-drive RAID5 with no parity(!) and that I was in grave danger because one of the disks was gone.  The actual RAID contents (spread across Drives 1, 2 and 4) were never in danger, unless a 2nd disk had failed while the spare was not seen by the Apple RAID card.  I wasn't too worried about that happening.

  • Magic Mouse won't work on mac pro with d-link dongle

    For the first time I am very unhappy with a purchase of an apple product. I today have finally gotten 2 of those magic mice; one is a present for my best friend (who is also excited) and the other one I wanted to keep for myself. Not more to say as an introduction.
    Before I went back home I tried my mouse on one of my late 2007 macbooks, and after the mm update everything was great. I loved the handling, the style, simply everything about that kewl new gadget. I couldn't wait to get home to connect it to my "big boy", my mac pro, where I usually work on all my tasks in my office.
    Since my "bb" is already a bit older (one of the first intel xeons -- 2x2 dual core engines, already upgraded for several times with drives and RAM) and didn't come yet with the internal bluetooth module I have a D-Link DWB-120M USB dongle in use which always has been reliable and so far has connected anything that cried for a bluetooth connection. Till today...
    I installed the software update 1.0 on my big boy and started the recognition routine. The name of the magic mouse appeared, it tried to connect, but then broke up with something I've never seen before: "The pairing attempt was unsuccessful. Click "Continue" to try again."
    I clicked "continue" for several times, read all the trouble shootings around the globe, reconnected it to my macbook (where it still worked fine and said, batteries are 100%), and finally must face the fact that maybe the dongle (or the procedure with it) must be the reason for the failure.
    I am not really a dull-one; so I finally understand that the D-Link DWB-120M from 2004 might be inoperable in regard of the magic mouse. My bluetooth logi mouse still works with it, but I cannot make the magic mouse work at all.
    So I want to ask into the big bubble if there are people around who could make the new mouse work on on a xeon mac pro with only a usb dongle, and which dongle it would be.. I already tried the support pages of D-Link, but, hey, ...should I really install IE6 or 7 on my mac to get support there??? I guess not.
    Any hint is appreciated. I gladly will get myself a working usb dongle for my big boy, which would make the magic mouse work on it.
    Thanks for your attention. Please add your experiences to my thread; maybe they're more people who would love to take advantage of your experiences.
    ..Blinky shiny magic mouse awaits its first job on big boy..
    Take care
    P

    PS: I run 10.5.8 on all of my macs. I didn't upgrade to snow leopard yet, which I expect would not change anything until the mouse update has been done on all of my macs.
    Thanks again
    P

  • 2008 Apple Mac Pro with SAPPHIRE TRI-X R9 290 4GB GDDR5 OC (UEFI)

    Dear Apple,
    Can you please add hardware/drivers support for the Sapphire Tri-X R9 290 GDDR5 OC (UEFI) Graphics cards to the latest Mac OS X 10.10 operating system?
    We have a few Apple Mac Pro's that we installed older Radeon 7970 graphics cards in (a few years back) and now we are upgrading the graphics cards to the newest Radeon R9 290 Series cards (Sapphire Tri-X R9 290 4GB GDDR5 OC UEFI).
    We chose the Sapphire Tri-X R9 290 4GB GDDR5 OC (UEFI) (11227-00-40G) Graphics cards.  
    The Sapphire Graphics card can be found here:
    http://www.sapphiretech.com/presentation/product/?cid=1&gid=3&sgid=1227&pid=2091 &psn=&lid=1&leg=0
    We have been trying to figure out how to get this graphics card to work with the latest OS X 10.10 Yosemite.  We are installing two Sapphire R9 290 graphics cards per machine.
    We want to make sure that the OS X drivers support multiple monitors, CrossFire, as well as HDMI audio, and support GPU hardware support in the latest OS X 10.10 Yosemite.
    Has anyone managed to get the Sapphire Tri-X R9 290 (SKU ID: 11227-00-40G) working in a 2008 or 2009 Apple Mac Pro?
    We have 24 Apple Mac Pro's and we purchased 48 of the Sapphire Tri-X R9 290 graphics cards (to install into the Apple Mac Pro's) and we're trying to figure out how to add driver support to OS X for the Sapphire Tri-X R9 290 / Radeon R9 290 to the latest Mac OS X.
    If I go into the "Graphics/Displays" Hardware section it shows that the Sapphire card (in Slot 2) is installed, but it only displays the name "Display".
    The properties of the Sapphire Tri-X R9 290 graphics card are:
      Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
      Device ID: 0x67b1
      Revision ID: 0x0000
      Kernel Extension Info: No Kext Loaded
    Any ideas as to how to install hardware drivers to get these graphics cards to work properly in OS X 10.10 Yosemite and to enable GPU hardware support in OS X and also enable HDMI Audio?

    Over a YEAR has passed, and we still can't get Apple to add the latest hardware drivers for the newest/latest AMD Graphics Cards (AMD R9 290 series).
    We have contacted AMD, and Sapphire, and everyone has pointed their fingers back at Apple, and said that Apple is the only ones that can add the latest graphics drivers to their Apple OS X Operating System.
    So the problem lies on Apple, and Apple refuses to update it's operating system to support the newest/latest hardware.
    AMD pointed us right back to Apple and said that it's Apple's OS X Operating System, and that it's Apple's job to add and write the newest/latest graphics display drivers to their OS X operating system.
    AMD says it's Apple's fault.  Sapphire says it's Apple's fault.  Apple just refuses to do anything, and ultimately it's Apple's operating system and Apple's closed-ended ecosystem that refuses to allow customers/users to upgrade their Apple Mac Pro computers to the newest/latest hardware.
    In the end, I guess the only solution is to abandon Apple Mac Pro products, and just start purchasing "Microsoft Windows PC" computers that we can upgrade and that have PCIe slots that we can just swap out the graphics cards (every year) with the newest/latest graphics card hardware.
    Here:  http://forums.amd.com/game/messageview.cfm?catid=440&threadid=181379
    Here:  https://www.sapphireforum.com/showthread.php?33574-2008-2012-Apple-Mac-Pro-with- SAPPHIRE-TRI-X-R9-290-4GB-GDDR5-OC-(UEFI)&p=277467#post277467
    Apple seems to be a "dead end" and they don't support their high-end customers and don't seem to support Apple Mac Pro (high-end) users.  Apple only seems to be concerned about selling iPods and iPads and iPhones, and they've abandoned their HIGH-END Apple Mac Pro users that want HIGH-END workstations for professional use.
    I guess if you want a high-end workstation, you have to go back to buying a Microsoft Windows PC, and start going back to using the Adobe suite, and just completely abandon Apple and Apple products all together.  (Apple is not in the business of designing or selling "high-end" products anymore).  Apple just designs low-end "overpriced" hardware, that you can't upgrade, and must toss in the garbage every other year, because you can't upgrade it.
    Apple has been heading this way for years, and the newest/latest "Black Shiny Trash Can" (that is NOT upgradeable and has no upgradeable PCIe slots and no way to even upgrade the video cards) and Apple has turned into a "disposable" computer company/business that just builds "All-In-One" garbage computers (that become extremely outdated and must be thrown away every other year, because they are not upgradeable) and you can't swap out video cards using standard COTS (Commercial Off The Shelf) latest Graphics Card adapters, and we can't even get the latest Mac OS X operating system to support the newest/latest graphics display hardware, it seems like our only choice (as others have stated before) is to abandon Apple products and begin moving/migrating back to Microsoft Windows 8.1 Pro machines.
    We can't get Apple to support their customers or update their operating system or support the newest/latest hardware in their operating system, so it seems to be a "dead end" ecosystem, and Windows 8.1 Pro and using standard PC hardware is probably a much cheaper/affordable route and it's a long-term solution, because Apple seems to come out with one nice product (every ten years) and then they don't support the product or it's users, or don't follow-up with Apple OS X operating system upgrades, and then you are stuck with very old outdated hardware because you can't even get the newest/latest drivers for the latest graphics cards/hardware.
    The only solution is to boot directly into Windows 8.1 Pro, and use Windows drivers, but then why even own a Apple Mac Pro if we can't use Apple OS X and can't even use our OS X software, and the only solution is to use our Apple Mac Pro as a Windows PC?
    We're really disappointed in Apple and how Apple fails to update Apple OS X and fails to support the latest graphics cards (such as the AMD R9 290 graphics card).
    I think 2014 is the last year that we are going to deal with Apple.  Starting in 2015, as part of our 2015 New Year's Resolution, I guess we'll start e-baying our Apple Mac Pro equipment, or selling it (as salvage) and begin purchasing standard Microsoft Windows 8.1 Pro high-end workstations, and get away from the old legacy dead-end Apple garbage hardware and dead-end Apple OS X operating system.
    It shouldn't be this hard, just to get some graphics drivers released to support the latest graphics card (which has been out for over a year now).  The Radeon R9 290 graphics cards were out in mid 2013 (for over a year and a half, almost 2 years now...) and we are already coming up on 2015, and Apple still hasn't added drivers support for the R9 290 series graphics cards to it's latest Apple OS X 10.10.1 Yosemite.
    It's a shame, but Apple has really gone downhill over the past few years.  Nothing but really old and outdated hardware, and even their "latest" Apple Mac Pro is 2-3 year old hardware (that Apple is marketing as "new") and it's non-upgradeable, and you can't even run/install the latest graphics cards into it.
    Apple is dead-end and it's not a place for "high-end" users anymore.  I guess Apple doesn't care about it's "high-end" user market anymore, and is just interested in designing silly iPhones and iPods/iPads.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Switching from ATI to NVIDIA graphic card caused initscript to break

    First off, I want to apologize for having to use a random BugMeNot account but the "What is the output of "date -u +%W$(uname)|sha256sum|sed 's/\W//g'"?" question is literally impossible for me to answer as my Arch Linux system will not boot up. Well

  • Cache Issue

    Hello All, I have a strange question....let say I have created a report... run the report output records count are 11 records Data cache generated in rpd Query cache also generated Now a new records has been inserted in backend (*backend record count

  • Loop in the received mails

    Hello, When I received a message from the external, I have a "loop" in my mail flow. I have not a problem with the receiving but it is strange. My headers are the follow : Received: from exchsrv.domain.com (192.168.1.x) by exchsrv.domain.com  (192.16

  • From and/or subject don't match msg body

    Hello all. Two weeks ago I posted this problem under a different head, but got no replies, so let me try again as it is messing up maybe 5% of my email. Every morning I collect email--from 40 to 70 messages, many forwarded from Gmail--and message fil

  • Pass one parameter from parent to child report.

    Hello experts, I am new in OBIEE. I have devloped report1 and report2. Report1 is master report and report2 is child report. Both reports are madeup of combined request to need to business requirement. I am facing issue to create navigation from repo