Integrated graphics (9400M) good enough for keynote?

I'm thinking about buying a new MBP 15 with only the 9400M card. Will this be good enough for keynote presentations (with some heavy graphics and embedded movies etc) hooked to an external projector?
(I have an 2006 MBP 15 which is dying (those pixelated horizontal lines) but that had discrete graphics Ati x1600 which had some problems with keynote transitions)
Thanks!

It should be able to handle Keynote with no problem.
But since this particular applications performance seems to
be very important to you, why not just put a Keynote presentation of yours on
a CD or flash stick and take it into an Apple Store. They will gladly let you try your
file with their new Macbook Pro's. If there isn't an Apple Store near you then go to an authorized Apple reseller.
That is the only way to be totally sure.

Similar Messages

Will specs on an iMac 24in 2.8ghz be good enough for video prod-Mac Newbie?

Hi guys, I do pretty high end editing in Sony Vegas but wanted to move to Final Cut Pro and Mac workflow. I've been a life time windows user and have been thinking about taking the plunge for about a year now.
I finally just purchased an iMac 24inch. The related specs are the standard 2.8 ghz, 2 GB ram, and ATI radeon 256 mb. It's still in the box. On my way home I kept wondering about the specs especially since I'm new to Mac. On a windows, those specs might not be that great. Will this be good enough for workflow in FCP. I'm going to upgrade the memory in the near future.
I was concerned about the graphics card? Will I see slowness or stuttering while editing with a lot of footage, rendering, etc. Thanks so much! I want to take it out of the box so bad!

It'll be fine for DV and HDV...footage imported from tapeless systems like P2 or XDCAM EX.
The graphics card doesn't come into play much with editing...only certain filters really use the GFX card...otherwise it is not important.
It is limiting in that you are only able to use Firewire drives, and since the computer only has one firewire bus, you might run into issues capturing this footage from firewire cameras...the drive and the camera will be using one firewire bus. But I haven't had too many issues with that...daisy chaining works for most of us.
Shane

Is this PowerBook Good enough for making music?

Is this powerbook : PowerBook G4 17Inch
17-inch TFT widescreen display with 1680x1050 resolution
1.67GHz PowerPC G4 processor
2GB memory (DDR2)
120GB 5400rpm hard drive
Slot-load 8x SuperDrive (DVD+R DL/DVDRW/CD-RW)
ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 graphics card with 128MB DDR memory
The Latest or the last model of Powerbooks
Is it good enough for making music or editing few video clips?
Will Snow Leopard run on it?
Can i upgrade more ram in it ?

Yes, that Powerbook can be used to make music or edit video clips. When it was new, it was required at the North Carolina School of the Arts for their Film program, using Final Cut software. Having a more powerful Intel CPU would speed up the rendering and processing times, however, the 1.67Ghz Powerbook can certainly handle video editing.
I know people that have used Garageband on it to make music.
The last operating system you can run on it is OS X 10.5 Leopard, with the last release being 10.5.8.
It's RAM is maxed out at 2GB.
As long as you don't need newer software that requires an Intel processor and aren't going to rely on that as your system to access streaming video's on the internet, it should work for you.

Is (4770 3.5 i7 qouad core 8 mb cach) good enough for premier and after effect?

Hi guys,
am buying the new imac 27" with its maximum features: 32 GB, 1 TB ssd, NVidia gtx 780 with 4GB, but I am worried about the cpu (4770 3.5 i7 qouad core 8 mb cach) is it good enough for premier and after effect?

Thanks John, but I've already read that page. I have just a simple question about the performance of "4 core" and "6core" if anyone had already tried both of them.

Is 96 kbps good enough for iTunes Match?

I have a pretty large music collection (20,000) but in order to save space I converted it all to 96 kbps. My question is whether or not that is good enough for iTunes Match? I've seen some people who haven't had any problems with 96 kbps but Apple says that it has to be above 96 kbps. I just want to know which one it is.
Thanks

No. 96 Kbps songs are not supported by iTunes Match.

Will 13 in Macbook Pro with Retina 2.6 ghz be good enough for engineering student

I'm purchasing a new macbook and not really sure which one to get. I have been thinking about getting the 13 in 2.6 ghz Macbook Pro with Retina, but will that be good enough for engineering programs such as AutoCad?

I agree that it would be slow, but the biggest limitation is RAM. 4GB simply won't, er, cut it.
A similar mac with at least 8GB, and a fast external drive, would work, even if not very speedy.
It really comes up to time, as babylonslim said.
If you need to cut very quickly, you need a machine like he described. On the other hand, I have no doubt that my very own, very old 2010 17" MBP could do the job - it has 8GB, and I use an external drive connected through e-SATA. The GPU is not nearly as fast as present day ones, and it only has a dual core i7 GPU. It would take longer, but it would work.

I am on a 22€ plan and looks to me like the 12€ would be good enough for me. Can I switch plan ? how do I do it?

I am on a 22€ plan and looks to me like the 12€ would be good enough for me. Can I switch plan ? how do I do it?

Cancel what you don't want and buy what you do want
Cancel http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/return-cancel-or-change-order.html
-or by telephone http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/phone-support-orders.html

Is photoshop good enough for video editing ?.

Hi.
Is photoshop good enough for video editing ?.
Thanks.

As DSLRs and cameraphones have added the ability to produce short videos, Photoshop has added that feature in for convenience.
This should clear up the question for you.
http://www.adorama.com/alc/0013918/article/Editing-Video-in-Photoshop-Ep-114-DSLR-Video-Sk ills-with-Rich-Harrington-Ador…
Of course it's not going to put Adobe Premiere or Final Cut Pro out of business.
Gene

Is new mac book air with 1.3 ghz and 4gb ram good enough for ios app development

Hello all,
I am thinking of purchsaing mac book air 13" with 1.3 ghz and 4gb ram.
currenlty i am using mac mini.Can any one help me if new mac book air with 1.3 ghz and 4gb ram good enough for ios app development to make it as my prmary machine for development.
Ragards.

A Macbook Pro 13-inch may be a better choice.
Best.

Is Pages Good Enough For Professional Printing?

I'm looking to do an Large Format Brochure (11" x 17") single fold and I've been using Pages for the mock up and layout. I was thinking that I would need someone to recreate the design in Quark, or Pagemaker, but now I'm wondering if I can do it all in Pages.
The printer that I plan on using is PSPrint (http://www.psprint.com/) and according to their offset printing specs and template, I just have to provide them with a 300dpi PDF. From what I've tested, exporting to PDF with quality set at "Best" I get a 300dpi file.
I haven't tested my output with photographs yet since we haven't purchased the final images and are using comps, but am I wrong in thinking that Pages is good enough for this project?
Template: http://www.psprint.com/DOWNLOAD/templates/brochures/brochurehalffold_11x17front.pdf
Thanks in advance!

There is no way to save out of Pages to pdf without flattening the transparency.
Proposition: In any save path, transparency is flattened in saving.
Test of proposition: Apple Pages '08 and Apple Mac OS X 10.4.11 as platform.
1. Launch system software and application software.
2. Insert first composition frame, select Apple Hoefler antiqua at 24 US pt, enter 'Type', leave default colour, leave default opacity.
3. Insert second composition frame, select Apple Hoefler antiqua at 24 US pt, enter 'Transparency', change default colour to rubrication red, change opacity to 50%.
4. Select e.g. File > Print > PDF > Save as PDF, name file 'Test', and select folder.
5. Launch Acrobat Professional 6 (first version with ISO 15930 PDF/X-3 verification), check the PDF version (: 1.4), check at high magnification (: no rasterisation), check that the source character string can be synthesised (: it can).
As posted previously, if transparency is applied, PDF 1.4 is automatically configured unless the path is ISO 15930 PDF/X-3 that does not support transparency (PDF 1.3 has an opaque imaging model, not a transparency imaging model). This is a simplistic test, but it is nonetheless a test.
Because Apple Quartz has applied transparency since 2000, and because there the matrix of system versions and application versions is somewhat monstrous, the notion of testing is somewhat notional .
/hh

K7N2G good enough for Quake 4?

Hello
Is K7N2G good enough for Quake 4?
I mean if Q4 should start at all. System requirements include GForce4MX, but the hangs after the splash window. I wonder what could be the reason. I did set the card shared memory to the required 64MB.
Thank you
T

In the minimum requirements it shows:
Intel®Pentium® 4 2 Ghz or AMD® XP 2000+ processor or higher
512 MB RAM
English Version of Microsoft®Windows® 2000/XP
100% DirectX® 9.0c compatable 64MB 3D Hardware Accelerator video card required
8X Speed CD-ROM Drive and latest drivers
2.8GB of uncompressed free hard disk space (plus 400MB for for Windows® swap file)
100% DirectX® 9.0c compatable 16-bit sound card and latest drivers
100% Microsoft®Windows® 2000/XP compatible mouse, keyboard, and latest drivers.
100% DirectX® 9.0c inlcuded
They also list Vid Cards:
ATI® Radeon® 9700
ATI® Radeon® 9800
ATI® Radeon® X300
ATI® Radeon® X550
ATI® Radeon® X600
ATI® Radeon® X700
ATI® Radeon® X800
ATI® Radeon® X850
all Nvidia® GeForce 3/TI Series
all Nvidia® GeForce 4/TI Series
all Nvidia® GeForce FX Series
all Nvidia® GeForce 6 Series
all Nvidia® GeForce 7 Series
If I read this list correctly you need to be a GeForce 4 TI, not an MX.
Take Care,
Richard
P.S. You will need to run it at the lowest settings and there is still a chance you will get a slideshow. A good Vid Card like an X850XT PE and a total of 2Gb of RAM and I am sure you will get good performance at higher settings.

I Want to buy the new mackook air (2013) .Will it be good enough for ios app development as i will be installing xcode.Is 1.3hz processor good enough.

I Want to buy the new mackook air (2013) .Will it be good enough for ios app development as i will be installing xcode.Is 1.3hz processor good enough.

The MBA is so small and thin many people can't help thinking it is like a Windows netbook - an underpowered toy. It isn't. There's nothing I do on my top end iMac that I can't - and don't - do on my MBA. Of course the iMac has a faster processor, bus speed, and a discrete video card so it is much faster than my MBA. Then again, my computers spend more time waiting for me to do something than I wait for them - and this includes using Photoshop and compiling code.
If I were writing large programs - something like Word for example - I'd want a very fast processor to speed up the compile/debug/compile cycle. But for iOS development your codebase will be much smaller. Frankly I can't see that much difference between a 13" MBA and a 13" MBP for development purposes. Now a top of the line 15" MBP is a different matter with its much faster CPU and separate video card.

Is a Pentium(R) Dual-Core processor good enough for Adobe Premiere Pro?

is a Pentium(R) Dual-Core processor good enough for Adobe Premiere Pro? Under system requirements, Adobe listed Intel Core Duo...not sure if this is just as good?

Hi Brian,
Good question. Keep in mind that these are minimum system requirements. I have not had a core 2 duo for some time, but I recall that the performance was not that good at that time, and this was CS5.5, or so. If you are going to use this machine, be sure to work at lower playback resolutions until you can afford a more powerful computer.
Video editors typically have more powerful systems than the minimum system requirements. Check our hardware forum for details: Hardware Forum
Thanks,
Kevin

Is CM RealPower 620 good enough for this ?

P35 Platinum Combo
E8500
N9800GT 1Gb (MSI)
2x2Gb ddr2-800
1x sata2 hdd
1x sata dvdrw
2x case fan
Is CoolerMaster 'Real Power 620W' PSU good enough for this setup ?
(Doesn't have PSU's specification at the moment)
Thanks

Cas, you have the coolermaster extreme power. There has been an issue with some models of coolermaster Realpower PSUs. I could re-state the reasons, but Bosskiller has addressed this several times.
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=120494.msg910400#msg910400
Quote from: Bosskiller
Quote from: mine0000 on 06-October-08, 02:09:39
The Cooler Master has been working just fine for more than a year with a ASUS P5N32-E SLI Plus and an Intel Q6600. The Antec P450 works fine there too. So why should I believe you (no disrespect intended)? What is the specific grounding issue with the Cooler Master? Can you give me a URL to the issue at their support site?
Thanks.
Yep:
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=118911.msg897491#msg897491
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=114534.msg858727#msg858727
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=113573.msg850339#msg850339
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=113170.msg846719#msg846719
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=113573.0
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=115623.0
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=115623.msg869135#msg869135
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=118959.msg897790#msg897790
http://forum.coolermaster.com/viewtopic.php?p=79607
Quote from: Ven on 07-August-08, 03:23:06
Wow are you serious..? Man that sucks...I hope I can get a return on it, damn.
EDIT: I spoke with there customer support line, they said they could RMA the power supply with a new revision that works with the board, I don't know what I'm going to do though.
Regardless if you get an updated model which has addressed the compatibility issue, you are better off with a single +12V rail PSU like the ones I suggested.

Building a computer - Is an i5-4460 good enough for Photoshop?

I'm building a desktop computer for web design, digital illustration and some gaming. I also want to learn/use Photoshop, Fireworks, Illustrator and Dreamweaver.
I'm trying to decide between processors. I'm looking at the i5-4460, i5-4590 and i5-4690. Many people have recommended i7s and Xeons, but those seem very expensive and I'm just starting to get into Photoshop. The i5-4690 is about the most I'm willingly to spend, but I don't want to throw money away if it isn't really necessary/won't help that much. I'm also not looking to edit massive photos. I want to be able to do digital illustration (comic book sized stuff) and web design (buttons, icons, web page drafts). Maybe while I have a web browser open at the same time.
Is the cheaper i5-4460 powerful enough to do what I want to do without me tearing my hair out in frustration? Should I really only consider the i5-4590 or the i5-4690? Is there any noticeable difference getting a i5-4590 or an i5-4690?
I need to get this thing built, so please let me know soon. Thanks.

SYRONKNAT wrote:
Good Day
pay a lot attention to GPU's for your money, d
I disagree. GPUs seem to be recommended a lot, yet I don't see a basis for it (in most people's work) with a modern processor. I know Adobe is working on making more processes GPU accelerated, but at the same time Intel is packing more and more into the integrated graphics.
I don't doubt that getting a super high end GPU will run faster in a benchmark, but even then it's arguable that it'll make a difference in you're work flow unless you spend a whole lot of time batch processing GPU-intensive processes or doing 3D or something. If you're not batch processing you're not going to notice that your GPU ran the oil paint filter in 3.7 seconds instead of 3.9. I'm making the numbers up, but that's about the gist of it. And we're talking high end GPUs. Mid range once don't make a marked difference over intel graphics. My desktop at home is running an i7-4770k, which I believe has the same integrated graphics as the i5-4560. I pulled my GPU out after a few tests and returned it, because I didn't see a noticeable difference in performance. It runs just find on integrated graphics. In full disclosure I don't do 3D or batch process often, but I do work on extremely large composites.
As to the RAM. RAM can be upgraded later. I wouldn't go over 16 unless you knew you needed it - which can easily be checked. You can get by with 8 if you're not a heavy user.
An SSD is going to make the biggest performance difference out of anything.

Integrated graphics (9400M) good enough for keynote?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for