Integration Broker - PTool 8.50 - Pinging remote node errors out

Hi! I am trying to configure default local nodes on HCM 9.1 and FSCM 9.1, both systems have PeopleTools 8.50.
HCM 9.1 is installed on Windows 7 Home Premium. DB is Oracle 10g
FSCM 9.1 is installed on Windows 2003 server. DB is Oracle 10g
Problem:
=====
When I ping remote node from HCM 9.1 it displayes the following message
“PeopleSoftTargetConnector - The application server is down (or not responding). Check AppServer URL.”
When I ping the remote node from FSCM 9.1 then I get the following message:
“PSFT Authentication token failed for Node PSFT_HR. (158,454)”
Setup Details:
=========
Here are steps I followed on both systems:
FSCM 9.1. side :
=========
1.Defined local gateway. http://<My-Machine B>:/PSIGW/PeopleSoftListeningConnector When I ping it from Gateway page, it shows it is active.
2.Renamed default node PSFT_EP to PSFT_TRN. Before renaming ran the appmsgpurgeall.dms script from <PS_HOME>\scripts\ to make sure there are no references to PSFT_EP in runtime tables. This is PS supplied dms script and they recommend to run this script before renaming any node (It should be done at the initial setup time).
3.On the Node page, PSFT_TRN node is defined as default node. Specified the default user Id as ‘PTINT’ the common User id created by cloning ‘VP1’. On the ‘Connectors’ tab Gateway ID is ‘LOCAL’ and connector id is ‘PSFTTARGET’. From the ‘Connectors’ tab Pinged the PSFT_TRN node and it was pinged successfully.
4.On Gateway Properties page, defined "APP Server URL" as ‘<Machine Name B>:9000, user Id/pwd as ‘PTINT’ and tool release as ‘8.50’.
5.Defined PSFT_TRN node, with APP Server URL as ‘<Machine Name B>:9000, user Id/pwd as ‘PTINT’ and tool release as ‘8.50’. When I ping this node, it is pinged successfully.
6.Inserted another node PSFT_HR, with APP Server URL as ‘<Machine Name A>:9000, user Id/pwd as ‘PTINT’ and tool release as ‘8.50’. When I ping PSFT_HR node from this page I get the following error:
“PSFT Authentication token failed for Node PSFT_HR. (158,454)”
HCM 9.1. side:
=========
1.Defined local gateway. http://<My-Machine A>:/PSIGW/PeopleSoftListeningConnector. When I ping it from Gateway page, it shows it is active.
2.On the Node page made sure ‘PSFT_HR’ node is default and active. Specified the default user Id as ‘PTINT’ the common User id created by cloning ‘PS’. On the ‘Connectors’ tab Gateway ID is ‘LOCAL’ and connector id is ‘PSFTTARGET’. From the ‘Connectors’ tab clicked on ‘Ping Node’ button for PSFT_HR node and it was pinged successfully.
3.On Gateway Properties page, defined "APP Server URL" as '<Machine Name A>:9000', user Id/pwd as ‘PTINT’ and tool release as ‘8.50’.
4.Defined PSFT_TRN node, with "APP Server URL" as ‘<Machine Name B>:9000', user Id/pwd as ‘PTINT’ and tool release as ‘8.50’. When I ping this node, the following message is displayed:
“PeopleSoftTargetConnector - The application server is down (or not responding). Check AppServer URL.”
Basically, I am unable to ping remote node on both systems. Local node ping successfully on both systems.
Has any one encountered similar problem and found a solution?
Thanks
Raj
Edited by: 865522 on Jun 13, 2011 2:18 PM

Yes, I could ping both machines from each other.
Here is the host file contents from Windows 7:
127.0.0.1 localhost
::1 localhost
127.0.0.1 activate.adobe.com
192.168.1.106 RAJ-PC
Here is from Window 2003 server:
127.0.0.1 localhost
192.168.1.100 saroja
Both nodes are listed under PeopleTools>Security Objects> Single Signon
Both nodes are secured with userid/pwd on Node page.
One of my machine had fire wall on, so I swtiched the fire wall off. Now machine A can ping both nodes but machine B can ping only local node. Pinging remote node displays "User name not defined in database".
Raj
Edited by: Raj on Jun 13, 2011 11:37 PM

Similar Messages

Unabe to ping Remote Node

Hi:
I have PS FMS 9.0 and PS HRMS 9.0 IBs (both PT 8.49.18) configured for SSO and messaging. I am able to ping remote node - PSFT_EP from HRMS environment but unable to ping remote node - PSFT_HR from FMS environment. I have performed the steps mentioned in the following thread:
Re: PeopleSoft Integration Broker from FSCM9 [PT8.48] to CRM9 [PT8.49]
But still I get the following message in app server log file:
PeopleSoft Token authentication failed: token has expired: VP1@JavaClient
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Sameer.

Is your gateway configured on SSL?
If its the default value on both the sides is same you could try the following:
1> Ensure the time zone diff (*IF ANY*) b/w the web n App server of the HR & FMS is catered for.
2> Try increasing the log fence to 5 on both the sides and ping the nodes to capture the Auth Token value.

Have any one attended Peoplesoft Integration Broker training from Oracle?

Hi,
Have any one attended Peoplesoft Integration Broker training from Oracle?
If yes please contact me on my mail id [email protected] i have some queries.
Thanks in Advance,
Amit

Yes, I could ping both machines from each other.
Here is the host file contents from Windows 7:
127.0.0.1 localhost
::1 localhost
127.0.0.1 activate.adobe.com
192.168.1.106 RAJ-PC
Here is from Window 2003 server:
127.0.0.1 localhost
192.168.1.100 saroja
Both nodes are listed under PeopleTools>Security Objects> Single Signon
Both nodes are secured with userid/pwd on Node page.
One of my machine had fire wall on, so I swtiched the fire wall off. Now machine A can ping both nodes but machine B can ping only local node. Pinging remote node displays "User name not defined in database".
Raj
Edited by: Raj on Jun 13, 2011 11:37 PM

Integration Broker: Ping Node Timeouts

Hey,
I'm trying to configure IB but I'm having problems with the node. Running PeopleSoft HR 9.1 with tools 8.50.11. I can sucessfully ping the gateway and it comes back with a status of active. Then I go to setup the node using the default node, PSFT_HR, and I ping the node. The process starts but never ends. After a few minutes the process timesout and the system kicks out. If I enter incorrect information, such as the wrong username/password, the process will end normally and give me a message.
Has anyone experienced this problem? Are there steps in the configuration I am missing?
Thanks in advance...

under advanced gateway setup, did u setup the local node with the right application server name and port number, right tools patch.
USERname and pswd should match from PSOPRDEFN, account should be unlocked.
gateway ping active status has nothing to do with the local node ping. check that out and update this discussion.
Thanks!

Integration broker node authentication question

I want to create a User ID that can authenticate an IB Node but cannot log into PeopleSoft through the PIA like normal users. How do I go about doing this? Is is jus a ol issue?

Hi,
The Document ID 785863.1 from Oracle Support, contains the following information:
I. In general, regardless of where the User ID is being used (a-d), the required permissions for a User ID to run Integration Broker messaging all PeopleTools 8.40-8.52 releases include full access to all methods of any Component Interface objects that may be accessed in the PeopleCode that is run during the asynchronous or synchronous messaging events (that is, from the Subscription or OnRequest PeopleCode in PT 8.40-8.47, and from Messaging Handlers PeopleCode in PT 8.48-8.52).
PeopleTools 8.48 and later releases (to the date, 8.48-8.52), have an extra requirement, access to each particular Service Operation that is to be invoked by that User ID.
II. On the other hand, there is a very important distinction between behavior of the PeopleTools version spans 8.40-8.47 and 8.48-8.51 regarding which User ID is used in which situation:
a. In PeopleTools 8.40-8.47, the UserID that runs Integration Broker messaging code is predefined globally:
For synchronous requests it is the User ID specified in the Jolt connection for that node in gateway properties.
For asynchronous requests it is the User ID that starts (boots up) and runs the application server domain of the receiving system.
b. In PeopleTools 8.48 and later, the User ID that runs Integration Broker messaging code will be one of:
If available, the User ID that initiated (sent) the message: that User ID is usually passed along with the message data.
Note that the same User ID must also exist and have the appropriate permissions in the receiving system.
If no User ID was passed with the message, then by default the receiving system will use the Default User ID from the definition of the sending node as indicated with the message data.
If neither user ID nor sending node was indicated, then by default the receiving system will use the Default User ID from the ANONYMOUS node definition in that system.
Regards,

PeopleSoft Integration Broker from FSCM9 [PT8.48] to CRM9 [PT8.49]

Dear Team,
We are trying to integrate between Finance 9 with PT 8.48 to CRM9 with PT 8.49 using Integration Broker. We followed the following steps
1. Configured the "LOCAL" Gateway which was successfully pinging in both the instances finance9 and crm9 and the domain status is active in both the
instances. We are using "PSFTTARGET co"nnector
2. Configured the default local node PSFT_EP in FSCM9 and PSFT_CR in CRM9 instances and successfully pinging the node.
3. For remote node, we are using PSFT_CR node in FSCM9 portal and PSFT_EP in CRM9 portal which are failing to ping.
4. Defined custom Message,custom queue, custom Services, custom Service operations, custom routing in FSCM9 portal.
5. We defined custom fields, custom records, custom pages, custom components, custom menu and successfully registed with the portal with Public access
in FSCM9 portal.
6. Now we are trying to add new values or add new record in the newly customized page in FSCM9 and trying to get the same record values in CRM9 database
using Integration broker with above integration configuration.
Can you please help with appropriate screenshots for the integrations between FSCM9 and CRM9
Require Screenshots for
1. How to configure the remote nodes.
2. How to configure Routings
3. How to configure Queue
4. How to assign custom message into custom message channel
5. What to configure in the PSAAPSRV.cfg and PSAAPSRV.ubx ?
6. What are the configurations required in "Main Menu > PeopleTools >Integration Broker > Configuration > Service configuration"

Hi,
Pls ensure you have the following in place...
1. All nodes being used for Integration should be defined on the Single Sign On Page in both the env's.
2. The passwords on all the 4 nodes should be same.
3. The external Alias of the Sv Ops in question should be identical.
4. Ensure that the User ID's initiating the request should be defined in the Target env along with access to that Sv Op and have the PeopleSoft User role.
What is the error message you are getting when you try pinging the nodes?
Also, the Sv Ops should be granted access preferably to the PL that the Role PeopleSoft User uses (PTPT1000). In case you have custom security in place then kindly refer to your security matrix to identify the correct PL...
Would also like to point out that in most of the Async Integrations its advisable to use existing queues, unless you have very specific purpose to use your custom queue.
Thanks!
Prashant

Integration Broker Setup Problem

I'm trying to setup Integration Broker/AppMessaging between portal and finance databases. I'm able to set up the default local nodes in both Portal and Finance and am able to ping them correctly. I'm also able to configure the Remote Finance node in Portal and ping that correctly as well. However when I try to ping the Remote Portal node in Finance I get an error UserName not defined in database UserName not defined in database. (158,55) .
Not sure what I'm doing wrong. The username and password are correct and exist in Portal. Anyone have any idea what I might be doing wrong?
Also another thing which is kind of strange. If when I ping the remote Node in Portal I change the UserID to an ID I know does not exist in Portal I get a different error message. I also get the same error message if I change the password to something that's incorrect (*the error is username and password incorrect*). If both UserID and PWD are correct I get the UserName not defined in database error.
Thanks for all help in advance!!
Edited by: Dosteov on Sep 23, 2009 12:55 PM

Dosteov wrote:
Hey Jim. Both our local gateways have the same URL (/PSIGW/PeopleSoftListeningConnector). I'm not a system admin but I think the same WebServer is hosting both gateways. I think all the listening/target connectors are written in Java right? So I assume they each will have their own Listening/Target objects instantiated on the same WebServer.
We opened up a case with Oracle and they just got back to me yesterday and told me the same thing. To point both gateways to the higher PT version.Frankly speaking, I'm surprise, unless I misunderstand something.
1. it is not secure to share same webserver
2. I've never had to do that for cross-version messaging to make it working (unless this is specific of your both PT version)
Nicolas.

Integration broker

Hi,
We are running on CRM 8.9 PT8.49 on AIX.
issue is IB- asynchronus outbound oneway message is stuck in working status,It ie. due to this all the other messages are queue in New status. In operation instace it going done , but in pubclication contract it is stucked in working. I am able to ping the remote node.
we are having separate appserver domain for IB, 8 publication,and subcription handler services are running,including four psappsrv.
I just restarted pubsub services, queues. and message is also active. this is what i found in logs for this queue
PSPUBDSP_dflt.356556 (6) [03/06/13 00:00:03](3) (PublishSubscribe): PublicationContractDispatcher::SynchronizeQueue(): The synchronization timest
amp for queue 'SGB_PAR_EVENTNOTIFICATIONS_MCH' was updated since the last synchronization, but no updated publication contracts were found.
can anyone help to find the issue here

I do not have a direct answer for you, but start here
E-IB: Troubleshooting Subscription Contract Stuck in Status WORKING [ID 1156984.1]
Sorry this doc is for Subscription not Publication.
But maybe this workaround will help
E-IB: Publication Contracts Stay in Working Status After Tools Upgrade [ID 1368868.1]
E-IB: PeopleTools 8.48+ Integration Broker Troubleshooting Tips [ID 650476.1]
Edited by: Hakan Biroglu on Mar 6, 2013 8:43 AM

Please help : Integration Broker setup issue.

Hello All,
I'm working on integrating Peoplesoft HRMS 9.0 with Peoplesoft ELM 9.0 with Peopletools 8.49. Referring PeopleBooks, I'm able to successfully setup;
1. Local and remote nodes (able to ping successfully)
2. Message
3. Nodes
4. Service operations and Security
5. Routings.
Next, when I open respective messages in application designer, the message definition properties USE tab is blank.
I'm not able to figure out the reason even after going through documents. I would appreciate if some one can help to figure out the reason.
Thanks,
TH

That is correct. IB was rewritten in 8.48. The Use tab is a
"hangover" to allow for converting from an earlier version to
8.48 and (within reason) a back convert.

Integration Broker Issue

Hello Gurus,
We are having strage issue with Integration Broker. When we include proxy server settings in Integration Broker properties file we are unable to ping certain nodes but when we remove Proxy server details we are able to ping nodes. We are on 8.49.08 tools.
I would really appreciate if some one could reply on this issue.
Thanks

The authorization comments above are good, but they assume that the target site requires authentication. Are you able to connect to the target URL from your browser without typing a username and password? If so, then you don't need to add the authorization header.
If you can't ping, then you have a connectivity issue. Log into your app server, open a shell prompt and type telnet <servername> <port> where <servername> is the name of your web server and <port> is the HTTP port your server is listening on (80 if no port specified in the URL). If you need a proxy server, then you can test connectivity by setting your app server's web browser proxy server to the same one listed in integrationGateway.properties and then test the URL from the app server's web browser (if it is a linux or other command line/headless app server, then try export http_proxy=http://your.proxy.server and then wget http://the.url.that/is/failing.
Turning up the log fence in integrationGateway.properties may provide additional information as well. When set to 5, you will get information in your errorLog.html and msgLog.html file.
For hands on help, you can open a case with Oracle Support.

Issue synchronizing with Integration Broker

I need some guidance in troubleshooting XenApp integration with VMware Workspace 2.1. It seems like I have successfully installed and configured the Integration broker.
I followed the steps from the installation guide.
Verify PowerShell remoting.
This sample command string applies to Citrix Server Farm 6.5.
Get-XAApplication -ComputerName CITRIX SERVER NAME
-> Works!
Type http://hostname /IB/API/RestServiceImpl.svc/ibhealthcheck to verify that the Integration Broker Web application is running.
The expected output displays.
All ok
Type https://hostname /IB/API/RestServiceImpl.svc/ibhealthcheck to verify that the Integration Broker Web application is running.
The expected output displays.
All ok
_> Works!
But then I added the Integration broker to the workspace portal and when I press "Sync Now" I get the message:
Calculating sync actions.
This takes a long time. When I look at the troubleshooting tab I see the following error:
Failed Sync Action: Could not pull objects from Integration Broker.
I use a self signed certificate on the Integration Broker. Any tips on how to troubleshoot, what to check?
I'm using Windows 2012R2 with IIS 8.5. I'm not sure if that is supported.

The IB healthcheck results seem ok indicating that the IB has been installed properly.
We need to check if the IB is able to communicate with the XenFarm server properly and able to fetch the resources and entitlements.
Please refer to the Workspace Documentation - Setting Up Resources in VMware Workspace Portal > Troubleshooting Workspace Resource Configuration ->
Citrix-Published Resources Are Not Available in Workspace.
Please follow instructions here to check if the IB is able to contact the xen farm server. Please send us the IB and connector logs when the failure happens.

SSH User equivalence is not set up on the remote nodes

I'm getting the above message when trying to push deploy a Linux agent 10.2.0.2 from an OEM.
I have run the sshUserSetupNT.sh succesfully - I believe there were no error messages being returned.
I can cygwin ssh to connect successfully to the linux box and issue commands without providing a password.
- and I've run the failing command from the log below successfully from a command prompt. (changed it to run date)
C:/cygwin/bin/ssh.exe -o FallBackToRsh=no -o PasswordAuthentication=no -o StrictHostKeyChecking=yes -l oraoem centos5 /bin/sh -c '/bin/date '
I appears to be complaining about an RSA key - but how can that be when I can connect from a command prompt succesfully.
Any suggestions!
snip from deployment logfile
=======================================================================
Performing check for CheckSSHEquivalence
Does SSH equivalence exist with the remote nodes
Setting username to oraoem
Setting FallbackToRSH to false
Setting REMOTE_PATH_PROPERTIES_LOC to D:\OracleHomes\oms10g\/sysman/agent_download/10.2.0.2.0/linux/agentdeploy
C:\WINDOWS\system32\ping.exe#centos5#-n#5#-w#5000
C:\WINDOWS\system32\ping.exe centos5 -n 5 -w 5000
Exitcode of the remote command [rnode centos5]: 0
Errstream [rnode centos5]:
CommandResult status [rnode centos5]: true
C:/cygwin/bin/ssh.exe#-o#FallBackToRsh=no#-o#PasswordAuthentication=no#-o#StrictHostKeyChecking=yes#-l#oraoem#centos5#/bin/sh#-c#'/bin/true '
C:/cygwin/bin/ssh.exe -o FallBackToRsh=no -o PasswordAuthentication=no -o StrictHostKeyChecking=yes -l oraoem centos5 /bin/sh -c '/bin/true '
Exitcode of the remote command [rnode centos5]: 255
Errstream [rnode centos5]: No RSA host key is known for centos5 and you have requested strict checking.
Host key verification failed.
CommandResult status [rnode centos5]: false
Expected result: centos5
Actual Result: Problem: 'PROV-16018: The command C:/cygwin/bin/ssh.exe failed.'
Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Failed <<<<
Check complete: Failed <<<<
Problem: SSH equivalence check has failed
Recommendation: Setup SSH equivalence with the remote hosts and retry

Reboot the box and try again.

The selected remote nodes 'node3' are not accessible

Hello,
I removed node3 from 2 node RAC Cluster.
After this I have re-add this node to my RAC. I added without any problem to CRS but I have a problem with script addNode.sh (/u01/app/oracle/product/crs/oui/bin).
I have to separate homes for ORACLE_HOME and ASM_HOME, so I need to run this script twice for each ORACLE_HOME.
I run addNode.sh from one of the cluster nodes (node1), if I run:
export ORACLE_HOME=/u01/app/oracle/product/11.1.0/asm
cd $ORACLE_HOME/oui/bin
./addNode.sh -silent CLUSTER_NEW_NODES={node3} CLUSTER_NEW_PRIVATE_NODE_NAMES={node3-priv} CLUSTER_NEW_VIRTUAL_HOSTNAMES={node3-vip}
I got the following error:
Performing tests to see whether nodes node2,node3 are available
............................................................SEVERE:The selected remote nodes 'node3' are not accessible.
... 100% Done.
I reviewed logs located in /u01/app/oraInventory/logs I found
Status of node 'node3':
null
The virtual host name 'node3-vip' for node 'node3' is already in use.
I checked crs_stat from $ORA_CRS_HOME, but all applications (ons, gsd, vip) and targets are ONLINE. I tried to run vipca -nodelist node1,node2,node3 and updated a configuration. I checked /etc/hosts, connection via SSH between all hosts belonging to RAC: node1, node1-vip, node1-priv etc. Everything looks like fine, so I have no idea what caused this problem.
Software which I used:
Linux: UNL 5.4 x86_64
11g Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit, Oracle Clusterware
Thank you for your answer,
Best Regards,
Edited by: user4924714 on 2010-02-15 07:50

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I am running addNode.sh from node which already exist in the Rac Cluster. I tried on node1, node2 but the resulat are the same.
Best regards,

11gr2 - 11.2.0.2 -root.sh executed on remote node first can harm anything ?

Hello Expert,
It seems like we have Oracle GRID forum having some issue so i am posting grid Question on Real Application Clusters forum.
I am installing 11gr2 - 11.2.0.2 Grid infrastructure on Red hat linux 5- x86_64 (Host01-04, Host01-LOCAL and Host 02-04 REMOTE) . During install it pop up to execute
orainstRoot.sh,root.sh as root and they clearly mentioned that execute
orainstRoot.sh,root.sh on local node first and then the remote node. But by mistake i have executed root.sh on remote node first HOST02 (Host01-04, Host01-LOCAL and Host 02-04 REMOTE).
Does it really affect anything?
Thanks in Advance.
Billy

Yes, you're right.
Its a empty Prod Box where nothing is running but eventually it would become Production LIVE box with Prod Database instances.
Yes, Only concerns about the master instance .As you seen below host 2 is master right node right now.without bringing down the node 2 can i convert node 1 to master.
we are not using ASM so you'll see ASM services in OFFLINE state.
HOST1: crsstat
Resource Target State
ora.LISTENER.lsnr ONLINE ONLINE on host1
ora.LISTENER_SCAN1.lsnr ONLINE ONLINE on host1
ora.LISTENER_SCAN2.lsnr ONLINE ONLINE on host3
ora.LISTENER_SCAN3.lsnr ONLINE ONLINE on host2
ora.asm OFFLINE OFFLINE
ora.cvu ONLINE ONLINE on host2---
ora.gsd OFFLINE OFFLINE
ora.net1.network ONLINE ONLINE on host1
ora.oc4j ONLINE ONLINE on host2---
ora.ons ONLINE ONLINE on host1
ora.registry.acfs OFFLINE OFFLINE
ora.scan1.vip ONLINE ONLINE on host1
ora.scan2.vip ONLINE ONLINE on host3
ora.scan3.vip ONLINE ONLINE on host2
ora.host1.ASM2.asm OFFLINE OFFLINE
ora.host1.LISTENER_host1.lsnr ONLINE ONLINE on host1
ora.host1.gsd OFFLINE OFFLINE
ora.host1.ons ONLINE ONLINE on host1
ora.host1.vip ONLINE ONLINE on host1
ora.host2.ASM1.asm OFFLINE OFFLINE
ora.host2.LISTENER_host2.lsnr ONLINE ONLINE on host2
ora.host2.gsd OFFLINE OFFLINE
ora.host2.ons ONLINE ONLINE on host2
ora.host2.vip ONLINE ONLINE on host2
ora.host3.ASM3.asm OFFLINE OFFLINE
ora.host3.LISTENER_host3.lsnr ONLINE ONLINE on host3
ora.host3.gsd OFFLINE OFFLINE
ora.host3.ons ONLINE ONLINE on host3
ora.host3.vip ONLINE ONLINE on host3
ora.host4.ASM4.asm OFFLINE OFFLINE
ora.host4.LISTENER_host4.lsnr ONLINE ONLINE on host4
ora.host4.gsd OFFLINE OFFLINE
ora.host4.ons ONLINE ONLINE on host4
ora.host4.vip ONLINE ONLINE on host4
Billy.

Want to keep the data on one node and allow remote nodes to read it?

by default, we have a distributed cache with backupcount=1 and data is kept over all the members in equal parts
is there a way to do set it another way: i need only one 'main' node to put entries into the cache and keep them locally, while remote nodes can only read entries? the reason for that - i want to update the entries on the main node quite frequently (do not them travel anywhere over the network) - while remote read operations are infrequent. Also, Iwant the whole dataset survive the shutdown of any secondary node. In other words, I need 'all eggs in one backet' with remote read access.

Andrey -
Provided the 'remote/secondary' nodes are within the local area network, you could use a dedicated distributed cache service; storage enabled
on the 'main' node and storage disabled on the 'secondary' nodes. Access from outside the LAN will require configuring a proxy service on the
'main' node and 'secondary' node access over Coherence*Extend.
/Mark

Integration Broker - PTool 8.50 - Pinging remote node errors out

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for