Integration model desnot exist

Hi,
I got a error in delta report with the message
No active integration model exists in R/3
Message no. /SAPAPO/CIF184
The material in the plant has a change pointer "R". What does the "R" Change Pointers Exist with Method "Delete Complete Document" mean?
Is it saying that the location product is scheduled for deletion? Is there a check box checked in APO for deletion??
Also there is an active integration model with that product, location combination.
What does the message mean then???
Thanks.

You can always check for deletion flags in table /SAPAPO/LOC (check for deletion flag field LVORM) and /sapapo/MATLOC (check for deletion flag field LVORM)
Change pointer R means Completely Delete Document. This happens when someone deleted an order in APO and the same order deletion has not yet transferred to R3 due to some reason. The reason could be that you have set up change pointers in the system to stop automatic deletion transfer of orders or the fact that integration model does not exist.
So either make sure you have an active integration model setup for the product or get rid of the change pointer using /sapapo/c5 transaction

Similar Messages

Manual Reservations Integration Model

Hello All,
In our project, during Go-live we dint had manual reservation Integration Model Activated due to some business reason.
whenver a process order is created in R/3, Reservations for Components appear in R/3 and APO.
Now when the components are good Issued in R/3 during Finished Product Process Order, these dependent reservations are not deleted in APO though the stock is reduced. Upon analysis we found that by activating the Manual Reservation Integration Model , these reservation will be deleted and hence both the R/3 and APO System will be in sync.
Now the Problem is when we are trying to do this manual reservation Integration Model activation through Batch Job , activation is taking a very long time. Upon further analysis we found that for the material-Plant combinations, program tries to search records in table RESB and approximately it takes around 5 minutes for each material -plant combinations. In our integration model we have around 2400 Material-Plant Combinations. CFC3 settings for Reservations are select block size of 1000 and filter block size of 512. R/3 version is 4.7.
Table entries in RESB are close to 3.5 Million with 141 Extends.
So just wanted to check with you guys if anybody has experienced this problem before and what resolutions were put in place to addres this ? Are there any SAP Notes available ? I searched but could not found any.
also what would be the best way to go forward? Some of the options i could think are
1) Run the I.M for selected material-Plant Combinations
2) Run the I.M for generic selection Criteria ( i.e AS IS) during Weekend.
Pls share your opinions.
Regards,
Pawan.

Hello Kenneth,
As i understand from your message that if a final Issue Indicator is unchecked, then those reservations should be present in APO. However i got confused with your below statement
Therefore it is neccessary that reservations with final issue indicator set are available in APO.
I think you might be trying to tell reservations with final issue indicator unchecked ( and not SET) are available in APO.
Regarding Transaction Code MBVR, I have few queries
1) Does this T-CODE MBVR sets the deletion Indicator in Table RESB or does it delete the Reservation permanently from Table.
2) I am not able to locate Completed Items field, which will enable me to delete Reservations. Can you pls let me know the field name.
Pls note that whenever i am trying to delete reservations thorugh t-code MBVR, it gives a message " No Document exists for the Speficied data".
thanks for your assistance,
Pawan.

Requirement Reduction integration model

Hi,
Can someone explain in layman terms with an example what happens when "requirment reduction" object is CIF'd alongwith Planned independent Requirements (to APO). Why should/would someone create an integration model for requirement reduction when integration models exist for PIRs and Sales Orders consumption settings are taking care of netting (as applicable/set). we have funtionalities for consumption and reduction of sales orders from PIR's e.g in APO and ECC.
Thanks
Lok

Hello,
I would like to see a clear explanation to that as well.
From what I understand reading about this topic it is to have additional control over this by applying own logic in CIF.
Quoting the SAP documents:
<<If you set this indicator, you can create integration models specifically for
the Requirements Reduction filter object type (type T_FCC).
The filtering takes place on the basis of active integration models for
requirements reduction. In this case, you can control in greater detail for
which material-plant combinations a requirements reduction should be transferred
to SAP APO.>>
For normal cases this is not needed. Perhaps it is needed if you want certain shipments to other plants to reduce forecast. E.g. mixed MRP.
Regards,
Tor

Purchase Order Integration Model Activation Error "Source Invalid"

Hi Experts,
When I try to activate Purchase Order CIF integration model for a specific plant, I am getting an error
"SOURCE_INVALID" r XC 014
When I checked failed LUW, found one product which is Subcontracted.
These a Subcon PO exist at this plant and Vendor is Subcon Vendor.
Before IM activation, I have CIFed Subcon vendor and T-lane between Vendor to plant exists in APO.
Any idea how can I resolve this issue?
Thanks,
Vipul

Hi Vipul,
I hope you have created subcontracting purchasing info record and connected with the productuon version.
Secondly whether it is valid.
A purchasing info record of the category subcontracting which documents the subcontractor as the source of supply of the end product.
Regards
Datta

CIF Queues generated without active integration model

Hello All,
We are facing a unique issue, where queues are seen in SCM queue manager although those products are not there in any active integration model for transaction data.
The scenario is as follows:
1. We are CIFing only master data as we have only DP and release to R/3
2. There is active integration model for master data
3. There is no integration model for transaction data
However in SCM queue manager, I am seeing queues of type CFFCC "Location" "Product".
The function module name is /SAPAPO/CIF_IRQ_REDUCT_INBOUND.
We observed in R/3 that the goods movement transaction code MB1A is trigerring TRFC's which is generating the queues.
Has anyone encountered a similar scenario like this?
Regards,
Kedar

Oi Jackeline!
Hello, all!
I think Vikas got the point, but let me be more specific...
The transfer of requirement reduction depended in previous releases (until PI 2002.1) only on an integration model for material master data being active. Then a new type of integration models was created to control the sending of requirement
reduction.
To activate the new logic a flag has to be set in customizing.
Use transaction /CFC9
OR
R/3 SAP Customizing Implementation Guide
-> Integration with Other SAP Components
-> Advanced Planning and Optimization
-> Application-Specific Settings and Enhancements
-> Settings and Enhancements for Requirement Reduction
-> Evaluate the Requirements Reduction Filter Object Type:
Then, flag 'Filter Object Requirements Reduction'
If you set this flag no queue of type CFFCC* will be sent if there is no explicit active integration model for Requirements Reduction. Please set this flag in production and delete any existing queues of type CFFCC*. No new such queues should be created in the future as long as you don't activate the transfer via an integration model.
I hope this information helps to clarify this issue.
Please give your feedback concerning the given solution.
Thank you!
Will

Integration model activation issue - After Prod to Quality refresh of R/3

Hi Guys,
Our R/3 quality system refreshed from production. Hence all the integration models Logical system pointing APO production system. Mistakenly I deactivated all the integration model in R/3 Q system which having APO Production logical system.
All the IM in R/3 quality system are inactive. When try send material getting error message "relavent location doesn't exist".
For that try to move the Location getting error message "Location already exist in APO Quality" system.
Now I want to active the all the Plant, material.etc integration models. Please let me know if any more information and help to overcome the issue.
Thanks,
Saravanan V

Saravanan
Make a table level change and set the integration model flag as active in the table CIF_IMOD. This will help you solve the issue .
Go to transaction SE16 . Give table name as CIF_IMOD. Give the name of you integration model and execute . Now all versions of that integration model will be displayed ( this will happen if you have many inactive versions and do not have the RIMODDEL program to delete inactive IM's) . Choose the latest version and go to change mode and set the value of "Entry is active" (technical name ACTIVE) field to I.
You can take help from development team if you do not have authorization to SE16
Thanks
Saradha

More than one CIF integration model possible for material?

Hi Gurus,
we want to have two different integration models (with non-overlapping selections) for materials to be able to have separate selections, but we cannot make it work.
When we create them the first time and then activate them, everything works fine: both models send their products to APO in the initial load. However, if there are changes in products in both models, when we generate and then activate one of the models, the changes in the other one are lost: the generation-activation of the second model does not send any product to APO even if there were any changes in the master data (and we see the ALE pointers as processed in the table)
Is there any workaround to solve this issue in a system without CIF pointers in BDCP2?? The ECC system is below the relevant releases and will not be upgraded in the near future.
We could not find any mention to an existing limitation on the number of models being one neither in OSS notes nor the help pages.
thanks a lot,
Pablo

Pablo,
It is common to have multiple Integration Models for Materials.
I have never heard of transaction BDCP2. I also have never seen the problem you describe.
I usually prefer not to use change pointers at all for Master data, such as Materials. You can alter this behavior in CFC9, and instead use Business Transfer Events. This means that all fields that are relevant for 'change transfer' to SCM will move across almost immediately after saving the changed material master.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm70/helpdata/EN/c8/cece3be9cd4432e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Also read the links contained in this page.
If you wish to actually perform a new 'initial load', then run the Integration model through program RIMODINI. It may be a lengthy run.
As always, check first in your Qual system before committing to production.
Best Regards,
DB49

EWM CIF Integration Model master data transfer Issue

Hi Gurus,
I am not able to transfer the master data from ERP to EWM.
When I excecute the transaction CFM1 and CFM2 integration model ,the material is not getting transferred.
I am getting the below mentioned Error message.
"Location does not exist for external location 9997, type 1040, and BSG CSSCMDEV"
Please help me in resolving this issue.
Regards
Govind

Hi,
Thanks for the reply
I had created the location 9997 for the location type 1001earlier.
When I tried to delete the location and create new Location for Location type 1040.System is not allowing me to delete.Please let me know how to delete the existing Location.
Regards
Govind

Excluding a specific material from integration model

Hi,
All materials corresponding to a particular MRP type are in an integration model and the model is active.
Request you to inform the steps to exlude a specific material from this integration model even if it is having the same MRP type.
With regards,
Mrinal

Mrinal,
CFM1>For each model affected, call up the affected variant. Go to the material field. Select Multiple selections ('right arrow'). Select the 'Exclude values' tab (third tab). Enter the material or materials to exclude. Copy (F10).
Save the variant. Execute the program to generate the (newly modified) model. Save the model.
Go to CFM2. Activate the newly generated model.
Repeat for other affected models.
If the material previously been contained in active models, then the newly excluded master and transactional data will still exist in SCM. If you find it to be necessary to delete these data, then you need to go over to SCM and perform the necessary steps. Start with /SAPAPO/CCR to delete transactional data, then go to WUF to delete master data.
Regards,
DB49

Integration Model for the resources terminates with an error

Hi
we have deleted the existing Integration model for the Resources and trying to create a newones, when iam activating the new resource integration model it is terminating with an error "Resource already exists(mapping error occured)".
we did the consistency check for the resources and ran OM17 everything seems OK. when tried to the same in the test system it works fine...
How to rectify this..

5,
Deleting integration models for master data is a poor way to start any process.
The message implies that the offending resource probably was created locally in SCM, or perhaps to support a different Business System Group. The easiest solution is to delete the resource and then recreate via Core Interface.
Best Regards,
DB49

Integration model generation

Hi,
We have a integration model for master data- Schedule lines and contracts. We have a background job that generates and activates the model. If I regenerate the model in CFM1, does it hurt anything for the job?
I think every time you generate a model, a new model will be generated right? Does this cause any discrepancy?
Thanks.

There are two types of sending data to APO through CIF
1) Sending only changes (Delta)
2) Sending everything (Delta+ New creation).
Considering there are three materials which changed on a certain day then just activating the IM model will work perfectly fine.
If along with three materials there was also an addition of a brand new material in R/3 . Then only by generating the Integration model will not help .
You will have to delete the original IM and recreate the same IM by using variants then activate the IM. By doing so it will consider as a initial transfer and send all the three old materials and the brand new material changes to APO.
If you feel it is useful pelase reward points.
The reason behind this behaviour : When you try to activate already existing IModel, then it only activates those objects which are already been generated and present during the generation of the IM.
So if a new material is created you will need more than just to generate. You will have to delete the model, generate the model, activate the model.
Thank You
My
Thanks,
My

Unable to Create Entity Model from existing oracle database

Hi,
I am using Visual Studio 2013, .net framework 4.5, entity framework 5.0 and oracle 11g database.
Issue Description: I need to develop WCF service to exposing the account information which needs to get the data from 20 oracle tables. Trying to create entity model from existing oracle database. first i tried creating just two tables it
was created but it took more than 30 minutes. then i selected remaining few tables it took more than a days but nothing created just showing spinning the wheel. then i tried with fresh project and selected all the tables but same issue nothing created and
also there is no error. during this process i checked database query monitoring there is a big sql statement collection tables metadata. i don't know what was wrong the query taking too much time to complete the process.
we tried multiple machine and different oracle database all are same issue.
Sql server database -looks good no issues.
Any help/tips/ideas welcome to overcome this issue.

Hi Sakthimp,
Welcome to MSDN forum.
Your issue is out of support range of VS General Question forum which mainly discusses the usage of Visual Studio IDE such as
WPF & SL designer, Visual Studio Guidance Automation Toolkit, Developer Documentation and Help System
and Visual Studio Editor.
Because your issue only occurred with oracle database, moreover Oracle developed the Entity Framework for Oracle itself, I suggest that you can consult your issue on Oracle forum/community:
you will get better solution and support there.
Best regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

System copy:integration models altered

Hi SCM experts,
We have APO 4.1 connected to ECC system.Recently the QAS data is refreshed with PRD data and after that all CIF integration model variants in QAS are pointing to PRD system. There are more than 100 integration model variants and changing the logical system mnaualy to QAS client is taking long time.
Is there any standrad report or t.code by means of which we can do a mass maintenance of these integration model variants ?

Hi deeparai,
You can change the name of logical system in ECC table CIF_IMOD. However, the integration models will not become active unless you generate them again (CFM1/2/3).
Hope this helps in reducing manual work.
regards,
biplab

CIF - Integration model name and APO application

Hi Experts,
In the CFM1 Transaction, there are 3 mandatory inputs are Model name, Logical system and APO application.
Logical systems are customized in CFC1 transaction. I couldn't trace the model name and application creation.
What is the transaction to customize/Create the new Model name and APO application.
Hope this is very simple question to you and expect your soon.
Thanks,
Saravanan V

Hi Somnath,
Thanks for ur reply.
First I saved the selection as variant. But it was not updated in the IM table.
Then I tried to generate the model and now I can see the details when I use the F4 help.
So, to create a integration model need to generate the variant once.
Thanks for the confirmation.
Thanks,
Saravanan V

Transfer of material from R/3 to APO, Problem in Integration model

Hi
I have created Integration model for Transferring material from R/3 to APO.
While activating the model, it is giving error with status as i..e. SYSFAIL
On clicking the status, I am getting the following message
"Logical system R3CON does not assigned to Business System Group"
?Where to locate the BSG in R/3 and assign before transferring matl to APO
i require the steps&help to solve the problem.
Thanks in advance to all members for the help.
Srikanth

Dear Srikant ,
Pls check you have followed the below steps in the same sequence for R3 and APO
CIF Settings in R/3
Check ALE settings or activate ALE settings
Define the logical system BD54
Assign logical system to a client SCC4
Set the RFC destination SM59
Assign target system and queue type CFC1
Maintain the SAP APO release NDV2
Activate BTEs for SAP APO integration BF11
User parameters for CIF CFC2
CIF Settings in APO
Check ALE settings or activate ALE settings
Define the logical system BD54
Assign logical system to a client SCC4
Set the RFC destination SM59
Set up business system group
Create BSG /SAPAPO/C1
Assign logical systems to BSG /SAPAPO/C2
Maintain distribution definitions /SAPAPO/CP1
User parameters for CIF /SAPAPO/C4
You have got stuck up somewhere in R3 setting , which I have marked in italic font i.e.Assign target system and queue type CFC1
I hope this will solve your problem .
Thanks ,
Digambar

Integration model desnot exist

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for