Integration of HR of Solman 7.0 with ECC 6.0 HR

Hi everyone,
My scenario:
1. I have customized service desk and it works perfeclty.
2. I need to integrate hr of ecc 6.0 with solman 7.0
ie) when i terminate an employee in ec hr (PA40) the same employee if present in solution manager should also be terminated .
Pl help me in this issue.
System Config
Solman 7.0 stack 16
Regards
Vinoth kumar S

Sorry for replying late on your suggestion.
Ya i have taken your point into consideration,
My specific objective is an employee terminated in ECC 6.0 should also be terminated in Solution Manager 7.0 automatically and the position should be vacant .
Is there any clue over this issue?
Pl advise me to get in the right direction.
Regards
Vinoth kumar

Similar Messages

How to integrate SAP TM8.0 with ECC 6.0

Hi Experts,
Could any one please suggest is there configuration/integration document available to integrate TM8.0 with ECC 6.0 using PI 7.1.
I haven't found any documentation as of now. If there is no document ready can someone suggest what is the approach in the integration and configuration to be done in ECC 6.0, PI 7.1 and TM8.0.
We have TM8.0 installed and content is available in PI 7.1.
Thanks,
Chinna

please confirm, i am no XI expert
In you integration directory.
Create a configuration scenario for this integration scenario Invoiceintegration
Follow steps in the link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/EN/c4/b9863f365e4117e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
From the menu open the integration configurator. it open the integration scenario . then you have assign business system etc.
then finally generate.

How is the integration with ECC in SRM 7.0??

Hi,
Working with SRM 5.0 or 5.5 the use of XI for integration with ECC is not mandatory because when we send any document from ECC to SRM like requisitions (to convert them in shopping cards) or when we send any document from SRM to ECC like shopping cards, PO´s, contracts, we only use the RFC´s and the abap programs.
Is the same behavior with SRM 7.0?????
Could the integration from SRM 7 with ECC 6 work with RFC´S without XI or for this vertions is XI mandatory?????
Thanks

SRM70 is closely integrated with XI for transferring docs between ECC and SRM. SAP introduces eSOA tech nology with SRM70 and hence all documents like PR from ECC to SRM, Central Contract from SRM to ECC, PO creation (Classic), etc uses this techn ology.
Thanks,
Jagadish

SAP XI 2 BI Integration with ECC 6.0

Dear all,
we are planning to do XI integration between ECC 6.0 to BI
1) How to Get the BI Standard data from ECC 6.0?
2)We are planning to integrate Standard BI reports with ECC 6 0 through XI.
Please sugget the scenario for integration between ECC 6.0 to BI through SAP XI.
Thanks In Advance.
Mahesh

Hi Mahesh,
Please go thru these links
To push data from BW to XI, please check
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/biw/g-i/how%20to%20push%20data%20into%20bw%20from%20xi.pdf
To send data from XI to BW please check
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/biw/g-i/integrate%20bw%20via%20xi.pdf
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/40574601-ec97-2910-3cba-a0fdc10f4dce
XI-BI Integration unsing RFC
Pushing data from BI to XI using RFC Adapter
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=17734474&messageID=5878682
Thanks,
Shweta

Account integration problem with ECC 6.0

Hi
We have using PPM 5.0 system with ECC 6.0 system (No EHP). Problem we are facing is we are not able to created the PS project automatically.
I have done already all the necessary settings and in manual case it working fine it seems. I eager to know any suggestions on this to resolve, to achieve automatic creation of project.
Do you feel there is any issue with EHP?
Regards,
Pramod

Hi Pramod,
Refer to the note 1427365 for details. The pre-requisite for PS integration is as below:
SAP Portfolio and Project Management 5.0 SP02
and
SAP ERP 6.0 SP 17
or
SAP ERP 6.0 EhP2 SP07
or
SAP ERP 6.0 EhP3 SP06
or
SAP ERP 6.0 EhP4 SP06
or
SAP ERP 6.0 EnhP5
Regards
Amit

Pro/E integration with ECC 6.0

I want to integrate Pro/E with ECC 6.0 in order to transfer/exchange engineering data such as materials, BOMs, engineering changes, documents, etc.
Does anyone know of Pro/E functionality or a 3rd party product that does this sort of thing?
Kind regards,
Rex L. Farris

A direct interface is developed by .riess GmbH and SAP. It is SAP certified and supported by SAP.
For more information,
Go to <a href="http://service.sap.com/plm">http://service.sap.com/plm</a>
Life-Cycle Process Support -> Product Development -> Integration -> MCAD Integration -> Pro/ENGINEER

C4C integration with ECC 5.0

Guru,
My company is looking for implementing cloud for customer, but our backend system is running on ECC 5.0.
SAP had strongly recommended us to upgrade our ECC before implementing C4C project.
Through some reading, it seems that integration prerequisite is ECC has to be version 5.0
Or there is any workaround to integrate (standard integration) C4C to ECC 5.0 through HCI? Like by applying or enhancing standard iflow that released for ECC 6.0?
Thanks.
Cheers,
Jim

Not sure where you have read that ECC 5.0 would be supported. The official SAP position is summarised in the table below. You can clearly see that some functionalities even depends on what EHP level you are at with ECC 6.0.
SAP PI and HCI leverage the same iFlow content.

Need idea : Integration of CRM On Demand web services with Oracle SOA 10g

Hi Al,
Can anyone have any idea on integration of CRM on Demand Web service with Oracle SOA 10g specially BPEL 10g.
If you have any idea please share with us. Or if you know any good link on the same... please let me know.....
Thanks in advance
Debarshi

AFAIK there is no such mapping available, however you may want to take a look at this Support Community thread that discusses the migration and even gives some samples.
Jani Rautiainen
Fusion Applications Developer Relations
https://blogs.oracle.com/fadevrel/

Integration of CRM with ECC

Hi All,
We are doing same scenario(Integration of CRM with ECC and replication of material/customer).My question is how to integrate CRM and ECC(Proxy OR WS). what are the interfaces involve in sap pi and any software component required in PI side.
Please help me.
Regards
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
Check first these links:
Synchronizing SAP CRM data to external systems via SAP PI
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f0f10991-2c4d-3110-aab0-ad4bf5708baf?QuickLink=index&…
Regards.

CRM 3.0 integration with ECC 6.0

Hi all, I wanted to confirm if CRM 3.0 can be integrated with ECC 6.0
If yes, then which support pack,etc. will be applicable and what all issues could be encountered in integration?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Animesh,
just to be clear.
the CRM and the backend ECC60 are communicating via Plug -ins
you can read more information here
http://service.sap.com/r3-plug-in
http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000601131&
The other SP level of the systems (BASIS etc.) are independent.
Once you could conect the systems at basis level. You can begin your work at
Application level.
Whether you can have problems here please ask the CRM Gurus in a separate therad in other forum.
I Hope I have answered all of your questions.
Kind regards
Imre Takácsi-Nagy
Senior Support Consultant II.
SAP Global Support Center Austria
Netweaver WEB Application Server ABAP / JAVA

Integrating Retail MAP(Marketing and Advertising Planner) with XI

Hi,
does anyone have experience in integrating Retail MAP (Marketing and Advertising Planner) with SAP XI/PI,if so can give some idea how to integrate and any helpful links or documents please.
Thank you,
regards,
Sri

Hi Sri,
pls do chk this links it will be usefull
chk for .pdf links
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/80b79088-d508-2b10-b497-b1628cb84166
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/30a5e05a-f31c-2a10-4f84-a6977db0c366
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3ed09790-0201-0010-c28e-c639f87d40b9
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5bd723c2-0d01-0010-97a5-cb14fe7f2810
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7436ba46-0d01-0010-dca3-c03c34be2c3c
if found worth pls do the req
Thanx
Sampath

Account 360 with ECC integration

We are trying to integrate C4C with ECC and having issues with the report that is provided by SAP to transfer the data. In the report given in note : ZSAMPLE_ERP_REPORT_PUSH_DATA, there is a reference to proxy class - zco_operational_data_provision. We do not have integration with BW, so which webservice whould we use to generate this proxy.
Anyone had success with implementing this scenario?

Hi R@adi,
ZCO_COMMUNICATION_SERVICES_MAN is the firs WSDL in Communication arrange "360 OVERVIEW - ACCOUNT.
if you not show this WSDL, verify this question in "Project Scope":
-->Communication and Information Exchange-->Integration with External Applications and Solutions-->Integration with Central Analytics-->Do you want to make analytics data from the solution available to an SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse system?
Regards
Simone

Supplier Registration in ESourcing ( Vendor integration with ECC or MDM )

Hi All,
SAP ESourcing has the functionality of Supplier Registration. As per the functionality, Supplier will provide all the required information in the registration form. The Supplier form will go for approval to the Buyer / Purchaser. Once approved, the supplier will considered for RFx event. My questions are :
1 :Is there OUT OF BOX standard solution provided by SAP for integration of newly Approved supplier / vendor of ESourcing system with ECC so that system will automatically create new vendor in ECC.
2 : Is there OUT OF BOX standard solution provided by SAP for integration of newly Approved supplier / vendor of ESourcing system with MDM (Master Data Management system ) .
Please through some pointer on this ?
Regards,
Kalandi

Hi Kalandi
For your first question, if you deploy standard integration package provided by SAP for e sourcing-ECC integration, you can replicate approved e sourcing vendor to ECC using standard script (I think script name is "Publish to ECC" ).
In case you prefer a custom option,you can write a customized script to get a flat file (.CSV) download of e sourcing vendor whcih can be used to update ECC
As far as OUT OF BOX standard solution provided by SAP for integration of newly Approved supplier / vendor of ESourcing system with MDM (Master Data Management system ) is concerned, there is no standard solution provided by SAP but again since it is possible to get a CSV export of vendor field, it can be used to update MDM as well
Hope this helps!
Regards
Mudit Saini
Edited by: Mudit_UCB on Jun 28, 2011 1:20 PM

Crm compatibility with ECC 5.0

Could you please confirm that CRM 2007 can be ran together with ECC 5.0 and where I could find these kind of "compatibility" informations?

Hi Edwin
see similar post with this topic ....
Such information normally found in the Master Guide for SAP CRM (service.sap.com/instguides). This you should check first.
As an integration of a complete application does not exist, but an integration on product instances ("systems") level, the following approach is possible as well
-identify the required product instance for your scenarios in the Scenario and Process Component List viewer (service.sap.com/scl)
- check the dependency matrix (see http://www.sap.com/community/flash/KW22_08_Story_1.epx)
Keep in mind: As integration topics depend on customer specific system designs, you should test the situation in your own system landscape (Above sources concentrate on general recommendations)
regards,
Andreas R

Compatible versions with ECC 6.0

Hi,
We are planning the upgrade of our SAP installations:
- R3 4.6C, 4.7 --> ECC 6.0
- BW 3.1, 3.5 --> BI 7.0 (NW2004s)
- SRM 2.0 --> SRM 5.0
- CRM 4.0 --> CRM 5.0
Of course we can't do all the upgrades at the same time, so, in order to decide in which order we make the upgrades, we must be sure that the new versions will be compatible with the old ones.
In the quicklink "service.sap.com/r3-plug-in", menu option "SAP R/3 plugin --> Integration of SAP R/3 / Enterprise, ERP and SAP Components" there are some tables where we can analyze the compatibility between all the BW, SRM and CRM versions and R3 versions prior to ECC 6.0 (4.6C, 4.7, ECC 5.0), according to the plug-in version. From 2005 there seems to be a strategy change in the integration interfaces:
"SAP ECC 6.0 and subsequent releases will automatically contain all integration interfaces that so far have been contained in the SAP R/3 Plug-In and that ensured the technical integration with other SAP Components."
As I understand, ECC 6.0 will automatically contain all the integration interfaces and there will be no more R/3 Plug-In versions. How can I check the compatibility between ECC 6.0 and the other BW, SRM and CRM versions? In the quicklink there are integration matrix available for R3 Enterprise and ECC 5.0 but there is no information for ECC 6.0. Are the versions compatible with ECC 5.0 too compatible with ECC 6.0? As ECC 6.0 seems to "automatically contain all integration interfaces that so far have been contained in the SAP R/3 Plug-In", does it mean that the integration matrix available for ECC 5.0 is too valid for ECC 6.0?
We have found a specific note (931020 "SRM connection to an ERP 2005 (ECC 600) backend") for the integration between ECC 6.0 and SRM but we didn't find any note regarding BW or CRM.
How can we check wich versions (BW, SRM, CRM) are compatible with ECC 6.0? Can we use the integration matrix available for ECC 5.0 in the quicklink "service.sap.com/r3-plug-in", are there specific notes like the one available form SRM (931020)?
We need to be sure as soon as possible that after the upgrade of our R3 4.6C and 4.7 versions to ECC 6.0 they will be compatible with our actual BW (3.1, 3.5), SRM (2.0) and CRM (4.0) versions.
Thanks in advance!!

to followed unicode rules.
ABAP Development under Unicode
Prior to Unicode the length of a character was exactly one byte, allowing implicit typecasts or memory-layout oriented programming. With Unicode this situation has changed: One character is no longer one byte, so that additional specifications have to be added to define the unit of measure for implicit or explicit references to (the length of) characters.
Character-like data in ABAP are always represented with the UTF-16 - standard (also used in Java or other development tools like Microsoft's Visual Basic); but this format is not related to the encoding of the underlying database.
A Unicode-enabled ABAP program (UP) is a program in which all Unicode checks are effective. Such a program returns the same results in a non-Unicode system (NUS) as in a Unicode system (US). In order to perform the relevant syntax checks, you must activate the Unicode flag in the screens of the program and class attributes.
In a US, you can only execute programs for which the Unicode flag is set. In future, the Unicode flag must be set for all SAP programs to enable them to run on a US. If the Unicode flag is set for a program, the syntax is checked and the program executed according to the rules described in this document, regardless of whether the system is a US or a NUS. From now on, the Unicode flag must be set for all new programs and classes that are created.
If the Unicode flag is not set, a program can only be executed in an NUS. The syntactical and semantic changes described below do not apply to such programs. However, you can use all language extensions that have been introduced in the process of the conversion to Unicode.
As a result of the modifications and restrictions associated with the Unicode flag, programs are executed in both Unicode and non-Unicode systems with the same semantics to a large degree. In rare cases, however, differences may occur. Programs that are designed to run on both systems therefore need to be tested on both platforms.
Other Changes
1.     Bit Statements
2.     Adding Field Sequences
3.     Loops with VARY and VARYING
4.     Creating Subroutines
5.     Saving Programs
6.     Assigning Types for GET/SET PARAMETER
7.     Unreachable Statements
8.     Function Modules with Incorrect Parameter Names
1. Bit Statements
Previously, the system checked for the bit statements SET BIT i OF f [TO g] and GET BIT i OF f [INTO g]whether the field f is character-type; X fields, X strings, and flat structures are usually regarded as character-type. For Unicode programs this is no longer useful, because the types X and XSTRING no longer count as character-type and the bit by bit access to character-type fields or structures is no longer platform-independent. Therefore, with these operations in Unicode programs, the field f must be type X or XSTRING.
For the bit mask operations f O x, f Z x, and f M x you could previously use all number-type and hence all character-type types for the left operand f. In Unicode programs, the f operand must now be type X or XSTRING.
2. Adding Field Sequences
When adding field sequences, restrictions apply to the following statements in Unicode:
ADD n1 THEN n2 UNTIL nz [ ACCORDING TO sel ] GIVING m ...
ADD n1 THEN n2 UNTIL nz TO m [ RANGE str ].
1.     The operands n1, n2, and nz must be type-compatible with one another.
2.     The distance between nz and n1 must be an integral multiple of the distance between n2 and n1.
3.     A syntax or runtime error occurs if the fields n1, n2, and nz are not in a structure. This structure must be recognizable statically or its valid area must be marked explicitly using the RANGE addition.
4.     At runtime, the system ensures that the RANGE area is not left.
ADD n1 FROM i1 GIVING m [ RANGE str ].
1.     Field n1 must be within the structure. The structure must be explicitly defined using the RANGE addition if it is not recognizable statically.
2.     For this variant, the system also checks at runtime whether n1 and the addressed values are within the structure.
3. Loops
Loops with the VARY or VARYING addition are also problematic in Unicode, since a type-a access to memory contents cannot be ensured and memory can be overwritten inadvertently.
DO ... VARYING f FROM f1 NEXT f2.
For this statement, the fields f, f1, and f2 must be type-compatible with each other. To prevent memory contents being overwritten, a RANGE for valid accesses is introduced implicitly or explicitly for the following statements:
DO ... TIMES VARYING f FROM f1 NEXT f2 [ RANGE f3 ].
WHILE ... VARY f FROM f1 NEXT f2       [ RANGE f3 ].
A syntax or runtime error is caused if f1 or f2 are not included in f3. If the RANGE addition is missing, it is defined implicitly from FROM f1 NEXT f2 as follows:
1.     If both f1 and f2 are statically recognizable components of the same structure, the valid RANGE area is defined from the smallest structure that comprises f1 and f2.
2.     A syntax error is triggered if it is recognizable statically that f1 and f2 are not part of the same structure.
3.     A valid area must be defined explicitly using the RANGE addition if the connection between f1 and f2 is not recognizable statically.
If you specify a deep structure as the RANGE addition, the system checks for every loop pass that there are no field references, object references, tables, or strings in the area read.
4. Creating Subroutines
When automatically generating subroutines using the statement GENERATE SUBROUTINE POOL itab NAME name, the generated program inherits the content of the Unicode flag of the generating program.
5. Saving Programs
When automatically generating programs using the statement INSERT REPORT prog FROM itab, default values are set for the TRDIR entry as before. Amongst other things, this statement has the new addition UNICODE ENABLING uc, with which the Unicode flag of the inserted report receives the value of uc. If this addition is missing, the following applies:
1.     A Unicode program creates a Unicode program.
2.     A non-Unicode program in turn creates a non-Unicode program.
3.     A non-Unicode program becomes a Unicode program if it is overwritten by a Unicode program.
4.     A Unicode program remains a Unicode program if it is overwritten by a non-Unicode program.
6. Assigning Types for GET/SET PARAMETER
For the statements GET PARAMETER ID pid FIELD f and GET PARAMETER ID pid FIELD f, f must be character-type. You can use the EXPORT and IMPORT statements for storing non-character-type fields and structures.
7. Unreachable Statements
In Unicode programs, unreachable statements cause a syntax error. In non-Unicode programs, there was previously only a syntax warning.
8. Function Modules with Incorrect Parameter Names
In Unicode programs, calling a function module, whose parameter names are specified statically as a literal or constant, causes an exception that can be handled if an incorrect parameter name was specified. This only applies to function modules that are not called via Remote Function Call. In non-Unicode programs, an incorrect name was previously ignored.

Integration of HR of Solman 7.0 with ECC 6.0 HR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for