Integration of one or more tables into a single database alias name

Hi Experts,
Hi Experts,
I got some problem while working with the crystal reports in VB.NET. How to combine one or more table fields
with in the single database alias name?
--roseline

Please provide more info.

Similar Messages

Can I add more tables into existing Data Modeler

My Data Modeler has been generated by SQL Developer, it contains 68 tables. Later I would like to add more tables into my current model. Is there any way I can add more tables into my current model without creating a new one from the scratch? Thanks for your help.
Kevin

Hi Kevin,
you can add new tables using File>Import functionality - you can import from database or DDL scripts.
Working in SQL Developer you can drag tables from SQL Dev browser and drop them on relational diagram. If Ctrl key is pressed while dropping then subordinate tables also will be added to the model.
Here you can find tutorials http://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=44785:2:0:FORCE_QUERY::2,RIR,CIR:P2_TAGS:Data%20Modeler
Philip

Export Multiple tables into a single Excel Sheet

We have a use case where we need to export multiple tables into an excel sheet. The exportCollectionActionListener only allows one table (which is provided in the exportedId attribute) to be exported into Excel. So is there a method provided by adf to export more that one table into excel ?

dvohra,
I need to export multiple tables into a single excel sheet. These links only show how to export a single table to an excel sheet.
I have tried out this : http://iadvise.blogspot.com/2007/04/export-adf-table-to-excel.html. But i am not getting the popup to save the file. So i can't find out where the file got created.

Numbers: Copy/Paste from multiple tables into 1 single Table?

I would appreciate some guidance in creating a copy/paste script from multiple numbers tables into a different single table within the same numbers document.
The columns in the source table are in different positions to the destination table.
So for example, i would want to copy…
Sheet 1, Table 1 Cell A3 copy to Sheet 2 Table Z Cell B2
Sheet 1, Table 1 Cell B3 copy to Sheet 2 Table Z Cell C2
Sheet 1, Table 1 Cell C3 copy to Sheet 2 Table Z Cell E2
Sheet 1, Table 1 Cell D3 copy to Sheet 2 Table Z Cell F2
Sheet 1, Table 1 Cell E3 copy to Sheet 2 Table Z Cell G2
Sheet 1, Table 1 Cell G3 copy to Sheet 2 Table Z Cell I2
Sheet 1, Table 1 Cell J3 copy to Sheet 2 Table Z Cell H2
and repeat the copy/paste on subsequent rows of each table until there is an empty row in Sheet 1 Table 1 (or if this is difficult, say set the repeat to a max of 30 rows).
The script would then need to move on to Sheet 1 Table 2, and do the same copying to Sheet 2 Table Z (from where the previous copy/paste finished in Table Z).
Repeat process would finalise with Sheet 1 Table 6.
The Paste part would need to be pasting values, as the cells in the source tables do contain some formulas.
At the moment this is all done manually and does take some to to undertake.
If anyone can help, i would be very grateful.
Thanks,
Colin

Interceptor,
are you trying to aggregate data from severl tables into a single table? If so you whould be able to do this without a script. The function indirect() will allow you to construct the proper formula, which you may fill over (in the same row) to the appropriate cells, then fill down.
Here is a small example:
There are three data tables ("Table 1", "Table 2", and "Table 3"). And a summary "Table Z"
In table Z make the first row a header (as shown):
Use column A to enter the Sheet name and colomn B to enter the table name.
In row 1 (the header), enter the cells you want to get
in cell C2 type (or copy and paste from here) the formula:
=INDIRECT($A2&"::"&$B2&"::"&C$1)
now select cell C2, copy now select cell C2 thru H2, paste
now select the cells C2 thu H2, hover the corsor over the bottom edge of the selection, and drag the yellow cirlc down as needed to fill the formula down.
Update the sheet and table names as needed for each row

Need help with query joining several tables into a single return line

what i have:
tableA:
puid, task
id0, task0
id1, task1
id2, task2
tableB:
puid, seq, state
id0, 0, foo
id0, 1, bar
id0, 2, me
id1, 0, foo
id2, 0, foo
id2, 1, bar
tableC:
puid, seq, date
id0, 0, 12/21
id0, 1, 12/22
id0, 2, 12/22
id1, 0, 12/23
id2, 0, 12/22
id2, 1, 12/23
what i'd like to return:
id0, task0, 12/21, 12/22, 12/22
id1, task1, 12/23, N/A, N/A
id2, task2, 12/22, 12/23, N/A
N/A doesn't mean return the string "N/A"... it just means there was no value, so we don't need anything in this column (null?)
i can get output like below through several joins, however i was hoping to condense each "id" into a single line...
id0, task0, 12/21
id0, task0, 12/22
id0, task0, 12/23
id1, task1, 12/23
is this possible fairly easily?
Edited by: user9979830 on Mar 29, 2011 10:53 AM
Edited by: user9979830 on Mar 29, 2011 10:58 AM

Hi,
Welcome to the forum!
user9979830 wrote:
what i have:...Thanks for posting that so clearly!
Whenever you have a question, it's even better if you post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for your sample data, like this:
CREATE TABLE     tablea
(       puid     VARCHAR2 (5)
,     task     VARCHAR2 (5)
INSERT INTO tablea (puid, task) VALUES ('id0', 'task0');
INSERT INTO tablea (puid, task) VALUES ('id1', 'task1');
INSERT INTO tablea (puid, task) VALUES ('id2', 'task2');
CREATE TABLE     tablec
(       puid     VARCHAR2 (5)
,     seq     NUMBER (3)
,     dt     DATE          -- DATE is not a good column name
INSERT INTO tablec (puid, seq, dt) VALUES ('id0', 0, DATE '2010-12-21');
INSERT INTO tablec (puid, seq, dt) VALUES ('id0', 1, DATE '2010-12-22');
INSERT INTO tablec (puid, seq, dt) VALUES ('id0', 2, DATE '2010-12-22');
INSERT INTO tablec (puid, seq, dt) VALUES ('id1', 0, DATE '2010-12-23');
INSERT INTO tablec (puid, seq, dt) VALUES ('id2', 0, DATE '2010-12-22');
INSERT INTO tablec (puid, seq, dt) VALUES ('id2', 1, DATE '2010-12-23');This way, people can re-create the problem and test their ideas.
It doesn't look like tableb plays any role in this problem, so I didn't post it.
Explain how you get the results from that data. For example, why do you want this row in the results:
PUID TASK DT1        DT2        DT3
id0   task0 12/21/2010 12/22/2010 12/22/2010rather than, say
PUID TASK DT1        DT2        DT3
id0   task0 12/22/2010 12/21/2010 12/22/2010? Does 12/21 have to go in the first column because it is the earliest date, or is it because 12/21 is related to the lowest seq value? Or do you even care about the order, just as long as all 3 dates are shown?
Always say what version of Oracle you're uisng. The query below will work in Oracle 9 (and up), but starting in Oracle 11, the SELECT ... PIVOT feature could help you.
i can get output like below through several joins, however i was hoping to condense each "id" into a single line... Condensing the output, so that there's only one line for each puid, sounds like a job for "GROUP BY puid":
WITH     got_r_num     AS
     SELECT     puid
     ,     dt
     ,     ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY puid
                               ORDER BY         seq          -- and/or dt
                       )         AS r_num
     FROM    tablec
--     WHERE     ...     -- If you need any filtering, put it here
SELECT       a.puid
,       a.task
,       MIN (CASE WHEN r.r_num = 1 THEN r.dt END)     AS dt1
,       MIN (CASE WHEN r.r_num = 2 THEN r.dt END)     AS dt2
,       MIN (CASE WHEN r.r_num = 3 THEN r.dt END)     AS dt3
,       MIN (CASE WHEN r.r_num = 4 THEN r.dt END)     AS dt4
FROM       tablea    a
JOIN       got_r_num r ON   a.puid = r.puid
GROUP BY a.puid
,            a.task
ORDER BY a.puid
;I'm guessing that you want the dates arranged by seq; that is, for each puid, the date related to the lowest seq comes first, regardless of whther that date is the earliest date for that puid or not. If that's not what you need, then change the analytic ORDER BY clause.
This does not assume that the seq values are always consecutive integers (0, 1, 2, ...) for each puid. You can skip, or even duplicate values. However, if the values are always consecutive integers, starting from 0, then you could simplify this. You won't need a sub-query at all; just use seq instead of r_num in the main query.
Here's the output I got from the query above:
PUID TASK DT1        DT2        DT3        DT4
id0   task0 12/21/2010 12/22/2010 12/22/2010
id1   task1 12/23/2010
id2   task2 12/22/2010 12/23/2010As posted, the query will display the first 4 dts for each puid.
If there are fewer than 4 dts for a puid, the query will still work. It will leave some columns NULL at the end.
If there are more than 4 dts for a puid, the query will still work. It will display the first 4, and ignore the others.
There's nothing special about the number 4; you could make it 3, or 5, or 35, but whatever number you choose, you have to hard-code that many columns into the query, and always get that many columns of output.
For various ways to deal with a variable number of pivoted coolumns, see the following thread:
PL/SQL
This question actually doesn't have anything to do with SQL*Plus; it's strictly a SQL question, and SQL questions are best posted on the "SQL and PL/SQL" forum:
PL/SQL
If you're not sure whether a question is more of a SQL question or a SQL*Plus question, then post it on the SQL forum. Many more people pay attention to that forum than to this one.

Combine 2 Queries (from SAME table) into a SINGLE query

I have this two queries (from SAME table), and want to combine into one SINGLE query, how?
How can we use CASE WHEN THEN for such situation?
Query1:
SELECT t_inner.*,
Floor(t_inner.ProductiveTime/ 3600) || 'hr:' || LPAD(Floor(Mod(t_inner.ProductiveTime,3600) / 60),2,0) || 'min:' AS Productive_Time,
Floor(t_inner.OperatorDownTime/ 3600) || 'hr:' || LPAD(Floor(Mod(t_inner.OperatorDownTime,3600) / 60),2,0) || 'min:' AS OperatorDown_Time
FROM
(SELECT SYSTEMTYPE,
sum(TIME_TEST + TIME_STEP) AS ProductiveTime,
sum(TIME_IDLE) AS OperatorDownTime
FROM PFODS.PPL_TESTSYSTEMS_UTILISATION
WHERE (SYSTEMTYPE = '0005-072')
AND (TS_START >= to_date('13/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY'))
AND TS_End <= to_date('17/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY') + 1 + (1/1440) +(59/86400)
AND MONO != '9999999999'
GROUP BY SYSTEMTYPE ) t_inner
Query 2:
SELECT t_inner.*,
Floor(t_inner.MachineDownTime/ 3600) || 'hr ' || LPAD(Floor(Mod(t_inner.MachineDownTime,3600) / 60),2,0) || 'min' AS MachineDown_Time
FROM
(SELECT SYSTEMTYPE,
sum(TIME_IDLE) AS MachineDownTime
FROM PFODS.PPL_TESTSYSTEMS_UTILISATION
WHERE (SYSTEMTYPE = '0005-072')
AND (TS_START >= to_date('13/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY'))
AND TS_End <= to_date('17/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY') + 1 + (1/1440) +(59/86400)
AND MONO = '9999999999'
GROUP BY SYSTEMTYPE) t_inner
see http://postimg.org/image/koq87iyyz/ and
http://postimg.org/image/fv3zxa38n

with the first query,
SELECT t_inner.*,
Floor(t_inner.ProductiveTime/ 3600) || 'hr:' || LPAD(Floor(Mod(t_inner.ProductiveTime,3600) / 60),2,0) || 'min' AS Productive_Time
FROM
(SELECT SYSTEMTYPE,
--sum(TIME_TEST) AS TIME_TEST,
--sum(TIME_SYSTEM) AS TIME_SYSTEM,
--sum(TIME_STEP) AS TIME_STEP,
--sum(TIME_IDLE) AS TIME_IDLE,
sum(TIME_TEST + TIME_STEP) AS ProductiveTime
FROM PFODS.PPL_TESTSYSTEMS_UTILISATION
WHERE (SYSTEMTYPE = '0005-072')
AND (TS_START >= to_date('13/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY'))
AND TS_End <= to_date('17/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY') + 1 + (1/1440) +(59/86400)
AND MONO != '9999999999'
GROUP BY SYSTEMTYPE) t_inner
it gives output as from
http://postimg.org/image/koq87iyyz/
with the second query,
SELECT t_inner.*,
Floor(t_inner.MachineDownTime/ 3600) || 'hr ' || LPAD(Floor(Mod(t_inner.MachineDownTime,3600) / 60),2,0) || 'min' AS MachineDown_Time
FROM
(SELECT SYSTEMTYPE,
sum(TIME_IDLE) AS MachineDownTime
FROM PFODS.PPL_TESTSYSTEMS_UTILISATION
WHERE (SYSTEMTYPE = '0005-072')
AND (TS_START >= to_date('13/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY'))
AND TS_End <= to_date('17/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY') + 1 + (1/1440) +(59/86400)
AND MONO = '9999999999'
GROUP BY SYSTEMTYPE) t_inner
it gives output as from
http://postimg.org/image/fv3zxa38n/
I want to come those 2 queries into a single query, such that it gives both outputs as above. Let me know if you need any other information. thanks.

Extract Multiple Rows from a Single Table into a Single Row in a New Table

I have a table in a database that contains contact data like name, address, phone number, etc.
The folks who designed the database and wrote the application wrote it so that all contact records are placed in that table, regardless of contact type. In fact, the contacts table does not even have a column for "type" even though there are many
different types of contacts present in that table.
I am trying to write a mail merge style report in SRSS, that gets sent to a specific type of contact, based on criteria provided that must be obtained from another table, and that data is then used to get back to a specific set of contacts from the contacts
table.
The attached file directly below describes my problem and all related information in an extremely detailed way.
SRSSMailMergeIssue.pdf
Unless there is a way to make a SRSS Tablix point to two different data sets in SRSS, it looks like I have to combine multiple rows from the same table into a new table.
If anyone can review the details in the attached pdf file and possibly point me in the direction I need to run to solve this probelm, I would greatly appreciate it.
I also included a document (below) that shows the tables I reference in the probelm description.
dbtables.pdf

I found a solution.... and posted it below
select
dk.ucm_docketnumber [UCM DocketNumber],
dk.ucm_docketid [UCM DocketID],
vc.FirstName [Victim FirstName],
vc.MiddleName [Victim MiddleName],
vc.LastName [Victim LastName],
vc.Suffix [Victim Suffix],
vc.Address1_Line1 [Victim AddressLine1],
vc.Address1_Line2 [Victim AddressLine2],
vc.Address1_Line3 [Victim AddressLine3],
vc.Address1_City [Victim City],
vc.Address1_StateOrProvince [Victim StateProvince],
vc.Address1_PostalCode [Victim Postalcode],
oc.FirstName [Offender FirstName],
oc.MiddleName [Offender MiddleName],
oc.LastName [Offender LastName],
oc.Suffix [Offender Suffix],
oc.Address1_Line1 [Offender AddressLine1],
oc.Address1_Line2 [Offender AddressLine2],
oc.Address1_Line3 [Offender AddressLine3],
oc.Address1_City [Offender City],
oc.Address1_StateOrProvince [Offender StateProvince],
oc.Address1_PostalCode [Offender Postalcode],
pc.FirstName [Arresting Officer FirstName],
pc.MiddleName [Arresting Officer MiddleName],
pc.LastName [Arresting Officer LastName],
pc.Address1_Line1 [Arresting Officer AddressLine1],
pc.Address1_Line2 [Arresting Officer AddressLine2],
pc.Address1_Line3 [Arresting Officer AddressLine3],
pc.Address1_City [Arresting Officer City],
pc.Address1_StateOrProvince [Arresting Officer StateProvince],
pc.Address1_PostalCode [Arresting Officer Postalcode]
FROM ucm_docket dk
left outer join ucm_victim v on dk.ucm_docketid = v.ucm_docketnumber
left outer join contact vc on vc.contactid = v.ucm_victimlookup
left outer join ucm_offender o on o.ucm_offenderid = dk.ucm_offenderlookup
left outer join contact oc on oc.contactid = o.ucm_individualid
left outer join contact pc on pc.contactid = dk.ucm_ArrestingOfficerLookup
WHERE (dk.ucm_docketnumber = @DocketNUM)

Combine 2 internal tables into a single internal table

Hi
I need to replace the following join statement by splitting it into 2 select statements and then combine them into a single internal table
SELECT vbak~waerk
vbapvbeln vbapposnr vbapnetwr vbapbrgew
vbap~erdat                         "IM152805
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE l_t_orders
FROM vbak INNER JOIN vbap ON vbakvbeln = vbapvbeln
FOR ALL entries IN t_mchb
WHERE vbap~vbeln = t_mchb-vbeln
AND vbap~posnr = t_mchb-posnr.
Need to replace the above with separate select statements and then combine the result into a single internal table...
could anyone please help me...
thanks in advance

Hi,
Check the code below,
select vbeln waerk
from vbak into table it_vbak for all entries in t_mchb where vbeln = t_mchb-vbeln.
select posnr
     netwr
     brgew
     erdat "IM152805
INTO TABLE it_vbap
for all entries in t_mchb
where vbeln = t_mchb-vbeln
and posnr = t_mchb-posnr.
loop at it_vbap into wa_vbap.
read table it_vbak into wa_vbak where vbeln = wa_vbap-vbeln.
if sy-subrc = 0.
l_t_orders-waerk = wa_vbak-waerk.
l_t_orders-vbeln = wa_vbap-vbeln.
l_t_orders-posnr = wa_vbap-posnr
l_t_orders-netwr   = wa_vbap-netwr.
l_t_orders-brgew   = wa_vbap-brgew.
l_t_orders-erdat   = wa_vbap-erdat.
append l_t_orders.
endif.
endloop.
Reward if it is helpful.
Regards,
Bhanu

Concatenating rows of a table into a single string

Hi,
My report gets an internal table LINES from READ_TEXT function module. This internal table LINES has 6 rows. My requirement is to concatenate all the 6 rows into a single field of string.
This is wht i have done.
data str type string.
loop at lines.
concatenate str lines into str separated by space.
clear lines.
endloop.
this code concatenates first three rows of the internal table LINES into STR, however the next rows are not concatenated into STR.
I have tried using
data : str(4096) type c.
but still it doesnt work.
Please advise.
Many Thanks,
Pritish.

dont worry, the values will never get truncated.
have a look at this code.
REPORT ZSTRINGSTRANGE line-size 1023 .
data : lines type TLINE occurs 0 with header line.
lines-tdformat = '*'.
lines-tdline = 'This is line 1, This is line 2, This is line 3'.
append lines.
lines-tdformat = '*'.
lines-tdline = 'This is line 1, This is line 2, This is line 3'.
append lines.
lines-tdformat = '*'.
lines-tdline = 'This is line 1, This is line 2, This is line 3'.
append lines.
lines-tdformat = '*'.
lines-tdline = 'This is line 1, This is line 2, This is line 3'.
append lines.
lines-tdformat = '*'.
lines-tdline = 'This is line 1, This is line 2, This is line 3'.
append lines.
lines-tdformat = '*'.
lines-tdline = 'This is line 1, This is line 2, This is line 3'.
append lines.
data str type string.
loop at lines.
concatenate str lines into str separated by space.
clear lines.
endloop.
write: / str.

Bulk CSV Upload into one or more Tables

Hi,
Just wondering if people could please assist with a means of performing a bulk upload of a csv file (possibly large file), into multiple tables using ApEx.
I basically would like to allow the end user to browse and load the csv file.
Any assistance/example websites etc would be great.
Thanks,
Tony.

See this website .
Sam

Moving the data from multiple internal tables into a single one

Hello everyone,
I am creating a classical report which uses the following tables.
tables : ekko, ekpo, mara, makt,lfa1.
my input parameter is
Select-options Purchase Order number
Following fields are getting used.
Doc no                  EKKO-EBELN
Material              EKPO-MATNR
Item number          EKPO-EBELP
Quantity             EKPO-MENGE
Material Group          MARA-MATKL
Vendor                  EKKO-LIFNR
Old Material code   MARA-BISMT
Material Desc.           MAKT-MAKTX
Vendor name         LFA1-NAME1
Now i need to do the following task.
1 Select record from EKKO Using document number.
2 Select record from EKPO using EKKO record using Document no as key.
3 Find out Old Material code of each and every material from Material master.
4 Find out Material description for each and every material from MAKT.
5 Sort record on Vendor, Purchase Order number and Material.
I have defined seperate internal tables for these operation.
Once i have fetched records into these individual internal tables from the corresponding DB tables i need to move these values into a new internal tables which has all the above fields mentioned
I need to move these values into a new internal table because to display the values on the report.
Any idea for the above ? Plz help with a sample example or some relevant.
Regards,
Ranjith Nambiar

Hi
1 Select record from EKKO Using document number.
2 Select record from EKPO using EKKO record using Document no as key.
Use inner join and retrive data into one internal table.for Ex ITAB1
3 Find out Old Material code of each and every material from Material master.
Use ITAB1 with for allentries in MARA table to get the onl materil number populate in to one table.
4 Find out Material description for each and every material from MAKT.
Get the Material desc with the same manner as above,
5 Sort record on Vendor, Purchase Order number and Material.
now sort the ITAB1 as you req.
now Loop on the ITAB1.
and read above 2 tables for old matnr and matner deac and append into another table as you want.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Hiren Patel

How to combine large number of key-value pair tables into a single table?

I have 250+ key-value pair tables with the following characteristics
1) keys are unique within a table but may or may not be unique across tables
2) each table has about 2 million rows
What is the best way to create a single table with all the unique key-values from all these tables? The following two queries work till about 150+ tables
with
t1 as ( select 1 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
          select 2 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'a2' as val from dual )
, t2 as ( select 2 as key, 'b1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'b2' as val from dual union all
          select 4 as key, 'b3' as val from dual )
, t3 as ( select 1 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
          select 5 as key, 'c2' as val from dual )
select coalesce(t1.key, t2.key, t3.key) as key
,      max(t1.val) as val1
,      max(t2.val) as val2
,      max(t3.val) as val3
from t1
full join t2 on ( t1.key = t2.key )
full join t3 on ( t2.key = t3.key )
group by coalesce(t1.key, t2.key, t3.key)
with
master as ( select rownum as key from dual connect by level <= 5 )
, t1 as ( select 1 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
          select 2 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'a2' as val from dual )
, t2 as ( select 2 as key, 'b1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'b2' as val from dual union all
          select 4 as key, 'b3' as val from dual )
, t3 as ( select 1 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
          select 5 as key, 'c2' as val from dual )
select m.key as key
,      t1.val as val1
,      t2.val as val2
,      t3.val as val3
from master m
left join t1 on ( t1.key = m.key )
left join t2 on ( t2.key = m.key )
left join t3 on ( t3.key = m.key )
/

A couple of questions, then a possible solution.
Why on earth do you have 250+ key-value pair tables?
Why on earth do you want to consolodate them into one table with one row per key?
You could do a pivot of all of the tables, without joining. something like:
with
t1 as ( select 1 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
          select 2 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'a2' as val from dual )
, t2 as ( select 2 as key, 'b1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'b2' as val from dual union all
          select 4 as key, 'b3' as val from dual )
, t3 as ( select 1 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
          select 3 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
          select 5 as key, 'c2' as val from dual )
select key, max(t1val), max(t2val), max(t3val)
FROM (select key, val t1val, null t2val, null t3val
      from t1
      union all
      select key, null, val, null
      from t2
      union all
      select key, null, null, val
      from t3)
group by keyIf you can do this in a single query, unioning all 250+ tables, then you do not need to worry about chaining or migration. It might be necessary to do it in a couple of passes, depending on the resources available on your server. If so, I would be inclined to create the table first, with a larger than normal percent free, then do the first set as a straight insert, and the remaining pass or passes as a merge.
Another alternative might be to use the approach above, but limit the range of keys in each pass. So pass one would have a predicate like where key between 1 and 10 in each branch of the union, pass 2 would have key between 11 and 20 etc. That way everything would be straight inserts.
Having said all that, I go back to my second question above, why on earth do you want/need to do this? What is the business requirement you are trying to solve. There might be a much better way to meet the requirement.
John

Integration of Delivery header and item into a single ods

Hi Nagesh,
The reason why i have started a new thread is to award you some more points as i cannot assing you any more points in the prvious thread.
I ahve a question though.......
you want me to add hdr data to sales document number right.... bue my concern is how can i add transaction data (i.e., $ amount) as an attribute of document number and what if the value changes for some reason and how wud you want me to add it sales document number?????? is it like look up at hdr datasource to fill in the attributes os sales document number???
Thanks

Hi BWer,
I think you can reopen your previous thread and reassign points if you wish...
Anyway, you are realizing now that mixing HDR and ITM level of information could become quite tricky...
In any case to which amount are you referring to in your HDR datasource?? I don't see any amount there... Of course any key figure looked up in the header data and posted to item level will have to be carefully analyzed... The best would be to elaborate a routine posting it to ONE single item and/or to spread HDR value in all ITM records based on a rule...
another option (the wiser) is to keep the two datasets in different ODS...
hope this helps...
Olivier.

Rating filter moves images on light table into a single pile

Anyone seen this?
I have a bunch of images arranged on the light table with various star ratings. The images are arranged by number of stars into various grouping - all the 5's together etc.
When I use the filter in the browser to see only the 5's for example, the light table will show only the 5's as epxected.
When I then select unrated or better, all the rest of the images end up in a single pile on the light table.
If I filter on 3 or better, and then switch back, just the 2s and 1s end up in the pile, ie whatever is not displayed by the filter gets piled up.
Is this a bug or "feature"? If it's a feature it's very annoying, unless there is some way to "lock" the position of an image on the LT.

OK, so figured out a convoluted bodge-around:
1. Make an album of all your selects. Select all and make a new Light Table(LT) from all.
2. With LT selected, click the lock icon.
3. With LT still selected, hold down apple key, and select your album of selects (step 1). This opens this album in a separate tab, but because lock icon on LT is selected, the LT viewer area is still visible.
4. in you album of selects, type your chosen keyword search. From the resulting set, select and drag the image(s) to the LT viewer. Do this with as many keyword searches as required. When done you can optionally close the selects album tabbed browser.
5. Use LT as you normally would. You can now toggle on/off images by keyword by typing it in search field.
Any other methods I've tried crashes Aperture.
Comments anyone?

Can i select Records from two tables into an itab.

Hi,
    Suppose that i have two tables spfli and sflight.
    Now i want the records from both the tables into a single internal table.
    If so please let me know how this can be done.
    itab should consist of all the columns in sflight and spfli.
Regards,
Sai

Sai,
Yes u can do it using JOINs.
Use this link for ref
http://www.sap-img.com/abap/inner-joins.htm
INNER JOIN results are an intersection of the tables being joined where in only if both the tables havethe data the result is pused onto the result set.
WHERE as in LEFT OUTR JOIN you can push the data of the LEF T table on the resultset even when the join condition is not met.
The use is that you wantto have all the data that is there in left table and also the right table if the join condition is a success then right table fileds will have data else they are initial.
OUTJOIN's are used in MAINTENANNCE VIEWS, HELP VIEWS .
INNER JOINS are used DATABSE VIEWS.
Inner Join:-
SELECT pcarrid pconnid ffldate bbookid
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE itab
FROM ( ( spfli AS p
INNER JOIN sflight AS f ON pcarrid = fcarrid AND
pconnid = fconnid )
INNER JOIN sbook AS b ON bcarrid = fcarrid AND
bconnid = fconnid AND
bfldate = ffldate )
WHERE p~cityfrom = 'FRANKFURT' AND
p~cityto = 'NEW YORK' AND
fseatsmax > fseatsocc.
Left Outer Join
SELECT scarrid scarrname p~connid
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE itab
FROM scarr AS s
LEFT OUTER JOIN spfli AS p ON scarrid = pcarrid AND
p~cityfrom = 'FRANKFURT'.
Reward if helpful,
Karthik

Integration of one or more tables into a single database alias name

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for