Integration scenario in rep

hi,
i'm creating an integration scenario inthe repository. B2B. the scenari has two action one which picks a file and pother which drops a  file. i'm creating  the applicaiton component  as template. after doing the entire configuration when i import it in directory and when i'm tryin assign communcation channel for the first action its showing communaction channel not required. but it is required. i've created the party, service and communcatio channle in the directory. and the sender party  and sender service is being properly assigned from the integration scenario editor. anybody can suggest something.. please.
regards,
Rahul.

Hi Rahul,
it is necessary to add the required interfaces into the /servicesparties (including BPM service) in the directory, which are connected to the process.
receiver agreements are not stand alone but connected to interfaces.
Possibly this will solve your problem!
regards
Dirk

Similar Messages

  • Integration scenarios from Integration Rep

    Hi
    I try to import integration scenarios from Integration respository to Inetgration directory. But when I click on Tools --transfer scenarios from Irep, and then click on the question mark, there are no scenarios showing up.The Table is empty.
    Can any one help??
    Thanks
    Subbu

    Hi,
    Check whether your Integration scenario is activated properly or not....?once you activate it...you should be able to see the your integration scenario in the ID.
    Tools--->Transfer Integration scenario from Integration repository.Go for help button....and wait for a while...u can able to see all the objects of IR and filter according to ur namespace where u have developed ur integration scenario.
    Cheers,
    Prasanthi.

  • Transfer Integration Scenario from Integration Repository

    Hello,
    I am in the process of setting up a 2004s PI system. I have gone thru the PI template installer in the NWA, applied note 939592 due to a central SLD and I am not stepping through the readiness check from note 817920. I am using version 3 of the check. I am running into an error at step 2.7. This is the step to test the connectivity between the Integration Directory and the Integration Repository. When I press the F4-Help for the Field name, the search results returns "No objects found!". I checked all the connections in the exchange profile and they all seem to be set properly. I then went to menu Tools -> Configuration Wizard. I received a popup stating "Cannot connect to Repository". The details are the following:
    #22 11:32:10 [AWT-EventQueue-0] ERROR com.sap.aii.utilxi.swing.toolkit.ExceptionDialog: Throwable
    Thrown:
    MESSAGE ID: com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException
    com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: Cannot connect to Repository
         at com.sap.aii.ibdir.gui.scenario.wizard.core.WizardContext.checkRepository(WizardContext.java:65)
         at com.sap.aii.ibdir.gui.scenario.wizard.core.WizardContext.init(WizardContext.java:75)
         at com.sap.aii.ibdir.gui.scenario.wizard.core.WizardContext.setWizard(WizardContext.java:260)
         at com.sap.aii.ibdir.gui.scenario.wizard.ConfigurationWizardCommand.execute(ConfigurationWizardCommand.java:57)
         at com.sap.aii.utilxi.swing.framework.ExecutionContext.execute(ExecutionContext.java:196)
         at com.sap.aii.utilxi.swing.framework.ExecutionContext.executeSafe(ExecutionContext.java:134)
         at com.sap.aii.utilxi.swing.framework.CommandAction.actionPerformed(CommandAction.java:69)
         at javax.swing.AbstractButton.fireActionPerformed(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.AbstractButton$ForwardActionEvents.actionPerformed(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.fireActionPerformed(Unknown Source)
         at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.setPressed(Unknown Source)
    I did see another message in the forum (Re: Integration scenarios from Integration Rep) that was very similar but the solution provided in there did not work for me.
    Does anyone have any advice?
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Scott

    Yes, I checked everything under the "Connections" section to make sure port, host name, user and passwords were correct. From what I can see, it is all correct. I also checked under the IntegrationBuilder and IntegrationServer sections to make sure the port, host, user and passwords are correct. From what I could see, it was all correct.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Scott

  • Unable to Load the Integration scenario into the Integration directory

    Hi All,
    I am new to using SAP XI.
    Require your help on the following issue.
    I have built an Integration scenario, added Component  Type: Product Version, inserted actions and connections.
    I did check for any errors. I found no errors.
    When I am trying to load this scenario into the  Integration directory its not showing up the scenario in the popup.
    Navigation:
    Directory > tools> Transfer scenario from repository
    The status of Integration Scenario in the builder shows as
    "Being processed".
    I created the scenario 2 days back.
    Can some one help me in this? 
    Regards,
    Meher

    Hi All,
    Thanks to all who helped me.
    michal,divija : Can you please let me know in details how to activate Business Scenario?
    I did not create any business process.
    Sridhar: I did releases some locks on my process, no luck.
    Can you please explain me in more details?
    Should I have a process build for my Integration scenario to be activated?
    Thanks,
    Meher

  • The userexit is not working in integration scenario- inb. delivery creation

    Hi Experts please help,
    We know that vl31n is for inbound delivery creation.
    in one of the userexits of vl31n, I did code ( shifting the batch to vendor batch )...
    So,the user enters batch number under batch field and
    fill all other required information and saves to create inbound delivery.
    Whilw inbound delivery creation my coding in user exit gets executed and shifts the batch number to Vendor batch field.
    This we observed when we check in vl32n or vl33n, the batch entered shifted to Vendor batch field() batch field is space.
    This is working fine with vl31n inb. delivery creation.
    But in integration testing it failed.
    In Integration, what is happening the other system called "ICH" is creating ASN (shipping note) with the batch number, which inturn created the inbound delivery in R/3 via XI as shown like below.
    Integration scenario :
    ICH System (ASN)   --> XI -->  R/3 System (Inb. delivery creation)
    So when "ICH" triggers ASN to R/3 the inbound delivery creation is happening but the batch number is not shifting to vendor batch field.
    when we open the inbound delivery in vl32n, the batch number is under batch field only...it should be under vendor batch field.
    My understanding is my user exit coding of vl31n not getting executed in the integration process.
    Kindly help me what can I do to shift the batch sending from ICH to shift to vendor batch field.
    Please let me know if I could not explain the scenario.
    THANKS IN advance.
    YOUR HELP WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED.

    the ASN from ICH, it uses a standard idoc function module IDOC_INPUT_DESADV1 and there is one user exit EXIT_SAPLV55K_012 which calls ZXTRKU07
    need to code there.
    solved by meetings with some other experts.
    THANKS.

  • Adding a new reciever to an existing integration scenario of conf in PI7.0

    Hi SapAll.
    here i have got a requirement to add one more reciever to an existing integration scenario in Integration Directory(Configuration).
    this Integration scenario is for sending the idoc MATMAS.MATMAS05 From 5 Different SAP-R/3 Systems to 2 Recievers.
    here iam using 5 different business systems with idoc communication channels for sending idocs and 2 business systems for recieving idocs in file format with file adapters.
    so when iam trying to create new reciever detarmination or Interface Determination, it says object already exists.
    but i can created reciever agreement without any error.
    so can anybody guide me on how to create the Interface,Reciever Determinations without any error.
    regards.
    Varma

    now i just created a new business system with file communication channel
    Why have a Business System for a FILE channel? We normaly use Business Component/ Service.
    You mentioned IDOC SENDER channels....why? For IDOC we just create Receiver channels...unless you want to specify IDOC packaging.
    when iam trying to create a reciever detarmination from one of the existing sender system say like BUS_SENDER2 to new
    reciver system ex:NEW_BUS_RECIEVER it says object already exists.
    Receiver Determination can have the same BUS_SENDER2 system/ service as sender....but it should not have the same Interface Name....this is where PI is throwing the error.
    There already exists a Receiver Detremination with BUS_SENDER2 as source system and the same message interface.
    You can reuse the same RD by just entering one more receiver system/ service below the already existing one (in the RD)
    In short just search your ID and you will see a RD created with the source details which you are trying to use.
    If you want to see a difference, then create a new sender service/ system and then use this to create the RD!
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

  • XI Integration scenario for material replication from SRM to SRM-MDM

    Hi Guys,
    We are working with the following landscape:
    SRM Server 5.5
    ECC 6.0
    SRM-MDM 5.5 SP6
    PI 2005_1_700 SP0006
    I have a question for you about replication of the material master form SRM EBP to SRM-MDM.
    In XI we are trying to configure this scenario. For this we have imported the following XI Content:
    - SAP SRM Server 5.5
    - SAP SRM-MDM 2.0
    We have the following problem; that when tring to configure the this scenario we are getting GUID errors. Probable because some XI content is missing. In the SRM-MDM 2.0 XI content we also see that SRM 6.0 scenario's are avilable in the currenlty imported XI content, but when clicking on 'Edit action' in these scenario's we are getting the following error:
    "Software component version with GUID XXXXXXXXXX... does not exists"
    Can any one tell me why SRM 6.0 scenario's are availble in the XI content for SRM-MDM 2.0, and which additional XI content we need to import to get rid of these GUID error's?
    Becasue of this the configuration in the Integration Directory fails.Transfering the integration scenario to the Integration directory  gives a couple of errors: "Unable to load action. Check whether all necessary actions have been released in the integration repository".
    Hopefully some of you know what to do, because I am currenlty stuck....... Do we need to import additional XI content, or maybe the Xi content for SRM 6.0. If so where can I get the XI content for SRM 6.0. It is not available on the SAP Support portal as a download.
    Thx In advance.
    Regards,
    Wouter

    Hi,
    >"Software component version with GUID XXXXXXXXXX... does not exists"
    try updating SLD (CIM DATA) with the latest patch available
    Regards,
    Michal KRawczyk

  • SOAP receiver starting the integration scenario

    Hello experts,
    I am searching for a way to start an integration scenario with a SOAP receiver in the same way it is possible with JDBC sender (with a pool interval).
    The scenario is: I need to execute a webservice, getting information from it, and send this information to an abap proxy on ECC side.
    I thought about creating a ccBPM with a loop (with no end) and a wait step for doing it... although it works, I think it is not the best way for doing it.
    Thanks for your suggestions!
    regards.
    Roberti

    Thank you guys.
    Let me explain the scenario in a better way.
    The scenario is:
    1 - Automatically execute a partner webservice sync call with constant parameters.
    2 - Get the webservice response.
    3 - Map the response to get required information.
    4 - Send this information to an Abap proxy.
    5 - Process the information to proper abap objects.
    Note: This scenario needs to be automatically executed every 30 minutes.
    The purpose of this scenario is to GET documents (xml) from a partner web service and import the information to ECC, continuously, each 30 minutes. So, no one is supposed to start the process, it should be automatically triggered. The goal is exactly the same we have with JDBC or file sender adapter, where we can set a 30 minutes interval to automatically execute an sql statement in the database or read a file in a path.
    JAVAGUY and Stefan Grube, I did it in this way. But, scheduling an Abap job to start the proxy -> webservice -> proxy scenario, the Abap job is the RESPONSIBLE for the scenario. If something wrong occurs with that job schedule, the integration will stop working. I would prefer PI as responsible for the process, so I can have alerts and other execution guarantees.
    Abhishek Salvi and Pratik_du, I think that the scenario is clear now, don't it? About the ccBPM, this is another way I implemented the solution. I created a ccBPM with
    1 - A receiver that I execute just once
    2 - One loop with a condition 1 = 1 (infinite)
      2a (Into the loop) - A send step to execute the webservice sync call
      2b (Into the loop) - A receiver step to get the webservice response
      2c (Into the loop) - A map step to transform the information I need
      2d (Into the loop) - A send step to send the information to the Abap proxy
      2e (Into the loop) - A wait step to wait 30 minutes until execute the next step of the loop
    IIn this case, I will have a ccBPM running continuously and doing the job.
    I posted the question because I'm not sure which solution is better, and check if you can see another way to make PI the responsible for starting a scenario with a soap receiver like this.
    Thank you again.
    Roberti

  • XI testing POS Integration Scenario

    Hi Folks ,
    I am new to XI environment and have a query:
    I am configured a process integration scenario for sending TLOG to POSDM. Can you pl advice how can I go about testing my config. At present I do not have any POS-GM system running so I was wondering that I will have to put my *.txn file in the "Source Directory" specified folder...
    How can I do a test ..pl advice.
    thanks!!

    Hi sunny,
    No problem .........
    Please go thru this simple file to IDoc scenario.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/xi/fileToIDOC&
    and if you want to explore more about XI .. sure you want to ...then check out the following step by step scenario guide
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/xi/step-by-step+guides
    It will be helpful ......
    regards
    Ashwin

  • ALE/IDOC and RFC/BAPI Integration Scenarios with SAP DS for ESA v3

    Hi,
    we are planning two PoCs of Integration Plattforms. One of our major requirement set is SAP Integration into our existing SOA.
    Because we also have R/3 4.7 Systems in production, we are planning to test ALE/IDOC and RFC/BAPI Integration scenarios with these Integration Plattforms.
    My question is:
    We are looking for are smart solution to get a SAP Test Environment, where we can test ALE/IDOC und RFC/BAPI Integration scenarios.
    It is possible to do this with SAP DS for ESA v3 or shall we better use IDES for that purpose?
    Best regards,
    Steven

    Hi Abhishek,
      This is our scenario. We are doing an integration of SAP HR r/3 system with the CRM system. We need housing information details of the employees which we have in custom infotype 9310 in SAP HR system and we need those details in the CRM system. So am planning out for an ALE/IDOC approach for the integration and gonna  maintain the 9310 details in a custom table. In the CRM system, we gonna build a BOL layer for accessing the 9310 details. Also i'm preparing a HLD for this process. I wanna read and go through few same HLD's before i submit my proposal to my client. Please suggest me and help me out.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Arunmozhi.

  • Error in Protocol for Generation of Integration Scenario Configuration

    Hi,
    If I try to generate my Integration Scenario in simulation or real mode I get the follwoing error allways in the "Generation Statistics" section (last entry):
    <b>
    Error when creating or changing configuration objects  0</b>
    If I save it and check it - no errors could be found. Any ideas?
    Regards,
    Christian

    Hi Christian,
    you working with SAP software
    > Error when creating or changing configuration objects 0
    means:
    zero errors...
    Regards,
    Udo

  • R/3 u2013 XI u2013 MDM integration scenario - Standard import Maps problem

    Hi Data Masters,
    We are working on R/3 u2013 XI u2013 MDM integration scenario for Vendor Object. We have extracted main table Data using u201CMDM_CLNT_EXTRu201D program. Now while importing the data in MDM we want to use u201CStandard business content i.e. Standard Import Maps (Name u2013 cremdm - 03 u201D but this maps are not mapping all the fields. So do we need to extend this maps..??
    OK. Second, To create own maps we are facing following problems,
    1)     In source section many fields are reflecting twice means in two segments i.e. LFA1 and ADRMAS like Name, City, Street, country etcu2026 whereas in Target section we have one field for the same so how to maps this fields.
    2)     In source, There are few fields like ADRNR which have values but in target we donot have any fields to map for the same, so how to handle thisu2026
    Helpful answers will be rewarded,
    Cheers
    RC

    closed

  • Confusion with PI 7.1 with integration scenario

    Hi, expert,
    I read a lot of documents before I have physically logged on to PI 7.1, I thought I had a very good idea about the new version. However when I am physically in PI 7.1, I found I get a little confused.
    I know ES is a big thing in 7.1, but I will be working on integration (integration scenario), I thought this part is not changed from 7.0 to 7.1. Basically in 7.0, you defined message type and message interface, message mapping and interface mapping, then you go to ID to configure the integration scenario. However in 7.1, you do not have message interface anymore, instead, we have service interface under which you define operations, which is fine from ES perspective. But if I am only interested in integration, what I need is like PI 7.0: outbound interface, mapping, inbound interface, NOT the operation. Now how can I define 7.0 message interface in PI 7.1? (I know operation mapping is 7.0 interface mapping).
    Can I make following understanding?
    1) Operation in 7.1 is like messag interface in 7.0
    2) Service Interface is a tool to group multiple related operations under one roof.
    3) To define integration scenario, I do NOT need the modeling. Modeling is only relevant to model ES, NOT for integration scenario.
    So if I am only interested in integration scenario, what is changed from PI 7.0 to PI 7.1?
    Thanks for advice
    Jayson

    > Can I make following understanding?
    > 1) Operation in 7.1 is like messag interface in 7.0
    Service Interface with one operation whose name is same as the service interface and Xi 3.0 compatible type is same as 7.0 Message Interface
    > 2) Service Interface is a tool to group multiple related operations under one roof.
    Yes.
    > 3) To define integration scenario, I do NOT need the modeling. Modeling is only relevant to model ES, NOT for integration scenario.
    Yes.
    >
    > So if I am only interested in integration scenario, what is changed from PI 7.0 to PI 7.1?
    I did not work much on this area but, as long as you are replacing the interface mapping with operation mapping things must be pretty much same here. For your information, Integration scenario is not a compulsion unless u want to represent the scneario graphically and create the ID objects automatically.
    You can create the ID objects manually whitout creating an integration scenario on ESR.
    VJ

  • Interface Mapping for enhanced Receiver Determ. in Integration Scenario

    Hi guys,
    Defining Integration scenario is a pleasant way working with XI.
    But how to define the step "enhanced receiver determination" via message mapping in a scenario?
    has anybody come along to this issue?
    Kind regards
    Jochen

    hi,
       You use an enhanced receiver determination to have a mapping program determine the receivers of the message dynamically at runtime. Instead of creating the receivers in the receiver determination manually, you assign a mapping to the receiver determination and this returns a list of receivers at runtime.
    A typical usage case is if you do not yet know the names of the receivers at configuration time. In this case, you can define a mapping program, for example, which reads a list of receivers from a table or from the payload of the message at runtime.
    http://www.****************/Tutorials/XI/RecvDetermination/Enhancement.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm
    Edited by: murali krishna on Sep 1, 2008 5:49 PM
    Edited by: murali krishna on Sep 1, 2008 6:03 PM

  • Integration scenario for Centralized Emergency Access and Helpdesk / CHARM

    Hi,
    Is any of you aware of a scenario doc between GRC and SOLMAN? Since Change Requests are referred in GRC, I assume there is an integrated scenario...
    Thanks in advance,
    Best regards,
    Ádá

    Can Firefighter logon using the Netweaver Business Client to launch Firefighter ID?
    - No, GRAC_SPM is the way to go.
    Is that mandate to use GRC system to launch Firefighter ID using GRAC_SPM transaction code? or can the user logon to local system as well?
    - Yes. However, the option would be nice to have a workaround in case GRC is down
    What about Portal based system Firefighting functionality? Can we have Firefighter IDs on Netweaver Java system?
    - As far as I know only for transactional SAP systems.
    Will I be able to grant a Firefighter ID to a Firefighter User on hourly basis?
    - Same as answered already  - no. 
    For initial setup , how the initial data load of Firefighter Ids Owners, Controllers and Firefighter Users can be done? Are there options like load from Excel or CSV available as part of setup toolset?
    - Same as answered already  - no.

Maybe you are looking for

  • IPhone5 question.

    I have an iPhone 5 that I have been syncing to the same computer for two years. Now when I connect the phone to the computer using a USB cable, I get a message saying the USB device has malfunctioned and is not recognized by Windows. It seems the iss

  • Purchase Requisition with wrong ordered quantities

    Hi, I´m facing the following problem: In a PR item, field EBAN-BSMNG are filled with quantities, but there are no subsequent documents with reference to this PR item. Also the item processing status is N - not processed. Any ideas why the EBAN-BSMNG

  • Not able to connect to the web

    Hello, just joined that forum because I have a problem which occurred not more than an hour ago and has been driving me crazy!. I'm no longer able to connect to the internet. I've been using at home my WI-Fi and now I still am connected to the networ

  • Finding missing Genre in iTunes

    Is there a way to sort all your music in iTunes by filling in the missing genre fields. It would be great to find a way of doing it that also matches iTunes classifications. If anyone knows of a way, it would be great to hear. Thanks

  • Printing from a Windows Machine (having problems)

    So I have read all the tutorials and what not that is out there and I am still having problems. First off, I have my Canon MP610 hooked up to my Win XP desktop. I went through and set up my wifes laptop (Win XP as well) so it can print and had no pro