Integration scenario with Proxy

Hi,
We have a complex out of box solution in PI, that we are tying to implement.
Purchase order is send from SAP ECC to PI 7.0. This idoc would be received at PI and than a return message ( I am not sure if it is called acknowledgment) is send back to SAP .
This acknowledgement contains only 2 field. PO no and some other key. This acknowledgment is received by SAP via server proxy. In the implementation method of server proxy, this information is retrieved and than there is call to BAPI to get the PO data. Once this data is fetched from SAP tables, a call is given to Client proxy to push the data to PI via client proxy. This is all done in this method
Finally PI will send this data to 3rd party.
I have assigned the B Systems to all the systems ( SAP and 3rd party). Also Proxy ( server & Client) is also ready since this Out of Box solution.
When we run this scenario and send IDOC to XI, I get the errors " Receiver agreement not found between sender SAP and receiver Integration engine. Also i get the acknowledgment window. In the payload i can see IDOC XML send by SAP and another XML with 2 fields but things are not moving after that
My Q is: How to resolve the error?
2: How to initiate the server proxy class so that wehn the PI sends the data to class, it calls the BAPI and than again invoke Client proxy.
3: This is first server proxy we are implementing in the SAP. What are the administrative function ( like serves etc we should check
Any help will be appreciated
Regards

Thanks for replying.
Here there is no BPM. The idea is that SAP Send the IDOC to PI and what I see from this is PI has to send back some acknowledgement in form of PO no and activity code. ( I got this from the mapping). Now this has to somehow go to SAP via Server proxy.
The code in the server proxy is written such that it retrieves this PO No and activity key than calls BAPI get details to retrieve the PO information from SAP. Once BAPI has the information, inside this code only there is call to Client Proxy to push the data to XI and than to XI will push it to 3rd party.
As far as configuration is concerned, I have assigned Business system to SAP swim lane and 3rd party swim lane. I am not sure what to assign the XI swim lanes ( there are 3 swim lanes)
When I generate and run this scenario, I get the IDOC in XI . But i get the error in Technical routing "
No receiver agreement found for sender -SAP300to receiver -INTEGRATION_SERVER_XID,http://www.xxx.com/mx/integration/sap.SAP_IDOC_EKSEKS_TOSAP
I have configured the receiver agreement betwen sender ( SAP ) and 3rd party receive ( HTTP post) but not sure how to do with integration server. Also I am getting error in acknowledgement " Error occurred during back-routing Error in communication channel"
Pls advice,
Regards

Similar Messages

ALE/IDOC and RFC/BAPI Integration Scenarios with SAP DS for ESA v3

Hi,
we are planning two PoCs of Integration Plattforms. One of our major requirement set is SAP Integration into our existing SOA.
Because we also have R/3 4.7 Systems in production, we are planning to test ALE/IDOC and RFC/BAPI Integration scenarios with these Integration Plattforms.
My question is:
We are looking for are smart solution to get a SAP Test Environment, where we can test ALE/IDOC und RFC/BAPI Integration scenarios.
It is possible to do this with SAP DS for ESA v3 or shall we better use IDES for that purpose?
Best regards,
Steven

Hi Abhishek,
This is our scenario. We are doing an integration of SAP HR r/3 system with the CRM system. We need housing information details of the employees which we have in custom infotype 9310 in SAP HR system and we need those details in the CRM system. So am planning out for an ALE/IDOC approach for the integration and gonna maintain the 9310 details in a custom table. In the CRM system, we gonna build a BOL layer for accessing the 9310 details. Also i'm preparing a HLD for this process. I wanna read and go through few same HLD's before i submit my proposal to my client. Please suggest me and help me out.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Arunmozhi.

Synchronous process integration scenario with PI 7.1

Hi all,
Iu2019m trying to create a process integration scenario which contains two actions. Both actions use the same synchronous interface to a web service which takes some parameters and returns a value. When I check the configurability it displays the errors:
Connection from Action1 to Action2 has no outbound interface
Connection from Action1 to Action2 has no inbound interface
and the warning:
Connection from Action1 to Action2 has no mapping
I first assigned the service interface as outbound interface to Action1 and inbound to Action2. Next I tried to assign the interface in- and outbound to both actions, but this didnu2019t change anything on the message. The same scenario with the interface set to asynchronous seems to be valid (but looses the return value of course).
Can anyone give me a hint what Iu2019m doing wrong? Is there any special consideration for synchronous communication which doesn't apply for asynchronous services?
Regards,
Tarik

Deleting and recreating the actions and service interfaces exactly the same as they were before solved the problem. Seems as if changes in the interface objects sometimes are not activated correctlyu2026

Customer specific codelists in integration scenario with CRM onPrem

Hi,
we are working on an integration scenario C4C <> CRM onPrem. The businesspartner masterdata should be editable in C4C and CRM.
We have several customer specific fields on the businesspartner in both systems.
In CRM we have implemented customizing for the values of these fields via customizingtables that can be maintained with TX:SM30.
We can also create finetuning-activities for the maintenance of the code lists for these fields in C4C.
As these customizingtables can have around 1.000 entries per table we are searching for a solution to maintain the values just in CRM instead of maintaining them twice.
Does anybody has an idea how to replicate customer specific codelist-values from CRM into C4C? Or maybe a valuehelp in C4C that retrieves the values via webservice from CRM?
Thanks
Danny

Hi Danny,
We have requirement like get all Oper Order based on Account from ECC to cloud and we have successfully achieved using External Web Service Integration.
We have consume ECC web service integration and retrieve all Open orders based on Account ID and display in the table.
So as per my knowledge you can read all value using web service call and maintained in custom OVS ( I have never tried ).
You need to check whether is it possible or not using custom OVS but if it is working for table than it may be work for custom OVS as well.
Please check this post below may be helpful to you
SAP Cloud SDK : Bi-directional Custom Web-service Integration with PI
Regards,
Mithun

Integration scenario with BPM

Hi all,
I have an integration scenario: iDoc -> XI -> iDoc,
On the XI I use a BPM process.
1. On the Repository:
I have designed the integration process on the IR, and imported the needed iDoc.
I have created an integration scenario which consists of two SAP R/3 SWC, and an XI3.0 SWC.
The XI3.0 is assigned to the integration process.
2. On the Directory:
I am using the wizard to configure the scenario.
I have assigned the R/3 SWC to the required business systems.
I have created a service named "ProcessBPM" for the integration process and assigned it to the XI SWC.
all other objects(receiver determination, interface determination... etc.) were created automatically by the wizard.
when I send the iDoc to the XI, I get an error on the SXMB_MONI:
Unable to convert sender service ProcessBPM to an ALE logical system.
What does this error mean ? What have I missed ?
Is this the way to do the described scenario ?
Thank you,
Elad.

Hi Elad,
one second
>>I have entered the logical system name of my XI,
you enter logical names for r3 business systems (idoc sender or receiver)
>>Logical system <LS_Name> already exists in service <Service_Name>".
they have to be unique
if you're using BMP - try replacing the business system in "header mapping" (sender system) in receiver agreement
(to your r3 - the one with the unique LS name) - this way you'll be able to use the name as many times as you want:)
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/5d/112d20f6ce6c46ba66afb98d278fbd/content.htm
Regards,
michal
Message was edited by: Michal Krawczyk

Integration Scenario with Oracle SOA Suite and SAP

Hi to all
I have the following integration scenario:
The customer have some applications in the integration landscape. All of this applications are integrated with Oracle Soa Suite.
This customer, want to buy SAP ERP (ECC 6.0), and they want to integrate SAP ECC in their infrastructure.
I told to them, that is necesary have Process Integration (PI), by have a services oriented architecture.
But, I want to hear options, possibilities and comments. Where I find information related ?
Thank you very much
Dario

Hi Rodriguez ,
you can use Oracle AS Adapter for SAP for integrating SAP system to oracle .
some step you need to do in SAP ECC side for data transfer - like create TCP/IP RFC connection ,
for TCP/IP RFC config. you can generate program ID in Oracle AS Adapter ..Also Oracle provides a SAP JRFC library for integrating SAP system .
you can find more information in given link -
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/integration/adapters/dev_support.html
Regards,
Amit Shivhare

More integration scenarios with the same business system in Int. Direct.?

Hi guys!
I need to integrate 5 business systems. I tried to create more integration scenarios (to do it clearly), but it is not possible to add already added business system to any other scenario...
What's the logic of this?
Can someone explain me it? Or some link?
Thanx Peter

hi Peter,
have you tried:
service without party ->
right click on your business system ->
add to scenario?
like this you can add your business system
to as many scenarios as you wish
Regards,
michal

Creating Process Integration Scenario with synchronous connections

Hi,
I'm trying to create a process integration scenario in which the first step is a synchronous call by a B2B supplier to a webservice hosted on PI ccBPM.
Step1) I have created two swim lanes:
Lane1: Supplier.
Lane2: PI ccBPM.
Step2) I've created an outbound synchronous interfaces for the supplier and an inbound synchronous interface for the ccBPM. I assigned these to two actions.
Action1: Supplier_Send(OutboundSync)
Action2: PI_Receive(InboundSync).
Step3) Assign the actions to the swim lanes.
Lane1 -> Action1
Lane2 -> Action2
Step4) Connect Action1 and Action2. At this step, the connection is shown as asynchronous. Since both the actions are synchronous, this is clearly incorrect.
Can someone please help?
Thanks,
Harsh

> Connect Action1 and Action2. At this step, the connection is shown as asynchronous. Since both the actions are synchronous, this is clearly incorrect.
Put actions on same level.
Connections are sync, when actions are on same level and async, when actions are on different levels.

Building an Integration scenario with the Foundation Pack

From what I can see most people use AIA so they can make use of the available PIPS.
Has anybody used just the AIA Foundation pack to build integration scenarios?
We are experiencing many problems just trying to develope a simple end to end process and wondered if anyone had a simple Do's and DOn'ts, or Step by step guide to developing a scenario.
There is a lot of documentation and its very difficult to find the relevant information as it seems to be spread across multiple docs.
Stuart

We have made some small progress using the Foundation Pack 2.3.
I thought i'd share some of my experiences for others who are having problems and finding it difficult to get info.
We used the Artifcat Generater which creates the ABCS (BPEL process).
We found several issue:
1. In ABCS Requester (which calls an EBS implemented as an ESB process) - Partner Links did not work. We were getting Invalid Port Type errors (i will post the error message when i'm back in the office), but on close inspection everything looked ok but just did not work. The simple work around was to delete the Partner Link and re-enter it manually. I wasted days investigating this problem and ended up creating my own test BPEL process calling the EBS to prove it was configured correctly.
2. The XSL stylesheets could not be tested in JDEV. We ended up commenting out many of the generated XSL templates (generated by the Artifact Generater), the main culprit seems to be GetSenderNode template, haven't got to the bottom of the issue but ended up commenting out much of the code, specifically the aia.Getxxxxxx functions. Once I get time and find more information i'll post my findings.
Good luck.

Integration scenarios with MS Outlook

Has anyone done integration of SAP RE-FX with MS Outlook Email or Calendar. I would like to know what business scenarios are available for configuration.
Regards,
Muhammad Hamdan

Hope you checked 'Duet for Microsoft Office and SAP' which probably suits your requirement.
Regards, Sekhar

SOAP receiver starting the integration scenario

Hello experts,
I am searching for a way to start an integration scenario with a SOAP receiver in the same way it is possible with JDBC sender (with a pool interval).
The scenario is: I need to execute a webservice, getting information from it, and send this information to an abap proxy on ECC side.
I thought about creating a ccBPM with a loop (with no end) and a wait step for doing it... although it works, I think it is not the best way for doing it.
Thanks for your suggestions!
regards.
Roberti

Thank you guys.
Let me explain the scenario in a better way.
The scenario is:
1 - Automatically execute a partner webservice sync call with constant parameters.
2 - Get the webservice response.
3 - Map the response to get required information.
4 - Send this information to an Abap proxy.
5 - Process the information to proper abap objects.
Note: This scenario needs to be automatically executed every 30 minutes.
The purpose of this scenario is to GET documents (xml) from a partner web service and import the information to ECC, continuously, each 30 minutes. So, no one is supposed to start the process, it should be automatically triggered. The goal is exactly the same we have with JDBC or file sender adapter, where we can set a 30 minutes interval to automatically execute an sql statement in the database or read a file in a path.
JAVAGUY and Stefan Grube, I did it in this way. But, scheduling an Abap job to start the proxy -> webservice -> proxy scenario, the Abap job is the RESPONSIBLE for the scenario. If something wrong occurs with that job schedule, the integration will stop working. I would prefer PI as responsible for the process, so I can have alerts and other execution guarantees.
Abhishek Salvi and Pratik_du, I think that the scenario is clear now, don't it? About the ccBPM, this is another way I implemented the solution. I created a ccBPM with
1 - A receiver that I execute just once
2 - One loop with a condition 1 = 1 (infinite)
2a (Into the loop) - A send step to execute the webservice sync call
2b (Into the loop) - A receiver step to get the webservice response
2c (Into the loop) - A map step to transform the information I need
2d (Into the loop) - A send step to send the information to the Abap proxy
2e (Into the loop) - A wait step to wait 30 minutes until execute the next step of the loop
IIn this case, I will have a ccBPM running continuously and doing the job.
I posted the question because I'm not sure which solution is better, and check if you can see another way to make PI the responsible for starting a scenario with a soap receiver like this.
Thank you again.
Roberti

Confusion with PI 7.1 with integration scenario

Hi, expert,
I read a lot of documents before I have physically logged on to PI 7.1, I thought I had a very good idea about the new version. However when I am physically in PI 7.1, I found I get a little confused.
I know ES is a big thing in 7.1, but I will be working on integration (integration scenario), I thought this part is not changed from 7.0 to 7.1. Basically in 7.0, you defined message type and message interface, message mapping and interface mapping, then you go to ID to configure the integration scenario. However in 7.1, you do not have message interface anymore, instead, we have service interface under which you define operations, which is fine from ES perspective. But if I am only interested in integration, what I need is like PI 7.0: outbound interface, mapping, inbound interface, NOT the operation. Now how can I define 7.0 message interface in PI 7.1? (I know operation mapping is 7.0 interface mapping).
Can I make following understanding?
1) Operation in 7.1 is like messag interface in 7.0
2) Service Interface is a tool to group multiple related operations under one roof.
3) To define integration scenario, I do NOT need the modeling. Modeling is only relevant to model ES, NOT for integration scenario.
So if I am only interested in integration scenario, what is changed from PI 7.0 to PI 7.1?
Thanks for advice
Jayson

> Can I make following understanding?
> 1) Operation in 7.1 is like messag interface in 7.0
Service Interface with one operation whose name is same as the service interface and Xi 3.0 compatible type is same as 7.0 Message Interface
> 2) Service Interface is a tool to group multiple related operations under one roof.
Yes.
> 3) To define integration scenario, I do NOT need the modeling. Modeling is only relevant to model ES, NOT for integration scenario.
Yes.
>
> So if I am only interested in integration scenario, what is changed from PI 7.0 to PI 7.1?
I did not work much on this area but, as long as you are replacing the interface mapping with operation mapping things must be pretty much same here. For your information, Integration scenario is not a compulsion unless u want to represent the scneario graphically and create the ID objects automatically.
You can create the ID objects manually whitout creating an integration scenario on ESR.
VJ

Problem with Integration Scenario involving BPM

Hello All
I've created simple async Integration Scenario.
Sender is SOAP, then message is being processed by BPM Integration Process (some simple mapping inside - for now it is just proof of concept - later on it will split messages etc.) . Receiver is JDBC adapter.
Now, when I test Sender-> BPM (using Test Configuration tool ) - works fine, no errors.
BPM -> Receiver - as well.
But when I'm trying to test Sender -> Receiver it fails (so it does when I call Sender webservice from external tool).
Error is:
Receiver Agreement
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">O U T B O U N D - B I N D I N G </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">determine OUTBOUND BINDING for: </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">-SENDER </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">-RECEIVER </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">http://company.com/xi/sn.DataOut </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">error with outbound binding. </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">
No standard agreement found for , SENDER, RECEIVER, http://company.com/xi/sn, DataOutt </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
In fact there is no Receiver Agreement for this pair of sender-receiver, but in scenario those are connected via BPM.
What am I missing in configuration to force PI to send messages correctly?
TIA
Regards
Maciej

Hi Maciej,
If you are trying to test it from the RWB -> Component Monitring-> Integration Engine-> Test Message option, then you should not be giving the receiver system and interface details.
Just specify the details of the sender system, interface name and namespace.
Give the user id and pwd details.
Give the Quality of service as "Exactly Once".
Paste the payload and click on SEND button. (DO NOT GIVE THE RECEIVER SYSTEM details).
It will work.
Thanks and Regards,
ravi Kanth Talagana

Using of Integration Scenario in a Abap Proxy to JDBC receiver synchronous

Hi ,
Can any one help me out how to go about for creating Integraion scenario in ESR as i'm new to the use of Integration scenario..
its an Abap proxy to Jdbc synchronous scenario... kindly help in this regards.

Hi Indudhar,
Right click on the namespace where you want to create the IS and say new, Select process integration scenario option, give a suitable name and say OK.
In the Component View section right click on the first grey column and Insert a sender Application component. Enter ur product and the software component version. Like wise in the next grey column enter the target Application component.
Now go to the top level menu and click on view and select grid.
Now right click on each App. component and insert the created actions. If the scenario is sync then the actions will be side by side otherwise the target one will be in the next grid of the target app. component.
After entering the actions click on the source action then press shift and click on the target action, right click and choose create connection between the two actions.
Fill in the info and then save.
Regards,
Anshul

BPM with integration Scenario

Hi Folks,
    I have designed a BPM scenario. Every thing is done but I dont know how to create a integration scenario when we are using an Integration process. My scenario is a simple BPM merge scenario. I have 2 messages as input and merging those messages into one as the input. I have 6 message interfaces like :
MSG_OB_ASYNC_1       -    Outbound Interface 1
MSG_OB_ASYNC_2       -    Outbound Interface 1
MSG_IB_ASYNC             -    Inbound Interface
MSG_AB_ASYNC_1       -    Abstract Interface
MSG_AB_ASYNC_2       -    Abstract Interface
MSG_AB_ASYNC_3       -    Abstract Interface
Kindly suggest the solution.
Regards,
   Santosh

Hi Santosh,
Create 3 application components as suggested above and create the required number of actions based on the number of message interface.
Create two 2 Async connection . 1 sender to BPm and 2 BPM to receiver.
the following will help in understanding the integration scenario designing .
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/EN/88/7adb7a030b424b8ef29b99461e52a8/frameset.htm
regards,
srini

Integration scenario with Proxy

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for