Intel 5300 and barebone 1646 gt640

Does anybody have any idea why this wireless card doesn't find internet more than 10 ft away from the router? Even when its plugged in, there is literally zero range. It even has the latest drivers installed. Any ideas on what the best wireless card would be for this laptop? This one, is obviously not it. My buddy made an identical build at the exact same time and his intel 5300 also struggles to pick up any wireless signal. Ideas/suggestions and advice are welcome. Thank you!

I don't know much about those things but my sisters laptop has an Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN & Intel ProSet drivers in it and it works fine from over 15 (at least 45 ft) meters and several walls between it and my router.
Not sure if it would work in your laptop but it sure works great in hers (it's a Dell)

Similar Messages

WRVS4400N V2 and Intel 5300 AGN can't connect at N speeds

Hi,
I have a Dell Latitude E6500 with the Intel WiFi Link 5300 AGN adapter. I cannot get it to connect to my WRVS4400N V2 at anything higher than 54 Mbps. I have downloaded the latest driver from Intel and N mode is enabled. Has anyone else managed to get these two to work together?
Thanks in advance.

I am having the same problem as kirksaban. I have an HP EliteBook 8530p with an Intel 5300 AGN. It can detect my WiFi network from the WRVS4400N is 802.11n, but it will only connect at 802.11g speeds. We have both an older and newer MacBook Pro that both can connect faster than 54 Mbps, but the HP will not. I checked the product brief on Intel's site and it claims the 5300 AGN will operate at both 2.4 GHz and 5.0 GHz (I will try to paste URLs below). Where did you find it would only operate at 5.0 GHz? Are we sure the band on the 5300 AGN is the problem?
http://www.intel.com/network/connectivity/products/wireless/adapters/5000/index.htm
http://download.intel.com/network/connectivity/products/wireless/319982.pdf

Intel 975x and E6600 overclocking?

I've attempted overclocking but I'm not sure if I'm doing it right.
E6600. 1GB RAM.
I've got my FSB @ 300 and set FSB & RAM at a 1:1 ratio. The RAM is now running at 533mhz as opposed to 667mhz.
My mobo is an Intel 975x and the RAM is DDR2 5300.
The only reason I'm asking is because I'm with stock cooling at 2.71Ghz and the test usually fails around 30 seconds with Orthos. So I'm stuck, Windows seems stable.
Anything you can guys can suggest?
Cheers.

Oh, in that case I think it's:
2x512MB Memory Speed 667 PC5400 timings manually set to 5,5,5,15
EDIT: Are the voltages and speeds I'm using safe? The memory voltage option at '2.0' was yellow so I was just wondering, I'm quite skeptical.
I've been running Orthos for about 20 minutes now and it seems to be running fine, of course it's not conclusive but the results are better than before.
I'm also wondering, If I were to upgrade my RAM what would be the best option for my setup? Like what timings and what speed RAM should I be looking for? Can I fit any speed DDR2 into this board?
EDIT2: Running Orthos, the cores are at 56C-55C respectively, is that an ok temperature?

Intel 5300 wireless issues

My fresh Arch 64 install doesn't appear to be recognizing the Intel 5300 interface at all.
I've reinstalled wireless_tools, iwlwifi-5000-ucode,
hwdetect --show-net results in:
NET : e1000e ppp_generic slhc mac80211 rfkill
ifconfig gives me:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:21:70:B9:C0:FB
inet addr:149.166.142.83 Bcast:149.166.142.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:42407 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:24349 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:48974218 (46.7 Mb) TX bytes:2501692 (2.3 Mb)
Memory:f6ae0000-f6b00000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:40 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:40 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:2000 (1.9 Kb) TX bytes:2000 (1.9 Kb)
The iwlagn module should be loaded:
MOD_AUTOLOAD="yes"
#MOD_BLACKLIST=() #deprecated
MODULES=(e1000e iwlagn iwlcore snd-mixer-oss snd-pcm-oss snd-hwdep snd-page-alloc snd-pcm snd-timer snd snd-pcsp snd-$
bash-3.2# lsmod | grep iwl
iwlagn 102148 0
iwlcore 86468 1 iwlagn
rfkill 12068 1 iwlcore
led_class 6408 1 iwlcore
mac80211 182184 2 iwlagn,iwlcore
cfg80211 29840 3 iwlagn,iwlcore,mac80211
Am I missing something obvious? The kernel is current as of today, which would make it kernel26 2.6.27.10-1.
Thanks for your help,
Chris

I'm getting this same error with the latest kernel
Linux koi 2.6.33-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 26 20:00:20 CEST 2010 i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7250 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
~ % lspci
0c:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Wireless WiFi Link 5100
iwlagn: Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link AGN driver for Linux, 2.6.33-ARCH-ks
iwlagn: Copyright(c) 2003-2009 Intel Corporation
iwlagn 0000:0c:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
iwlagn 0000:0c:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
iwlagn 0000:0c:00.0: Detected Intel Wireless WiFi Link 5100AGN REV=0x50
iwlagn 0000:0c:00.0: Unsupported (too old) EEPROM VER=0x114 < 0x11a CALIB=0x1 < 0x4
iwlagn 0000:0c:00.0: PCI INT A disabled
iwlagn: probe of 0000:0c:00.0 failed with error -22
~ % rfkill list
0: dell-wifi: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
1: dell-bluetooth: Bluetooth
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
2: hci0: Bluetooth
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
The iwlagn is loaded. and this is 32bit arch
Last edited by el mariachi (2010-04-29 20:28:59)

X200s w/ Intel 5300 - New driver leaves me wireless-less.

Hi All,
I'm hoping this forum can be more helpful than the support line...
The pre-installed wifi driver on my x200s was giving me problems from the time it arrived. After a day of wifi usage, Windows would slow to a crawl. After some digging, I verified that the wifi driver was causing DPC latency issues.
I upgraded the wifi driver to the Lenovo v13 module and all ability to use the wifi card stopped. I tried using the ThinkVantage tools to upgrade, I tried complete uninstall, re-installs using the downloaded driver from the Lenovo site. Nothing worked. I can see the device in device manager without error, however, fn+f5 doesn't show any wireless cards but the network center CAN see the wireless device and shows full green bars.
I could not downgrade my driver since I couldn't find it on the Lenovo site.
I did install the Intel generic driver for the 5300 and that was able to have me connected, but once again, I was left with one day of usage then a reboot. Failing to reboot eventually leads to a BSOD.
I've called Lenovo support and the fellow there says, "The only reason their driver wouldn't work is if the hardware was broken." Which I find a little hard to stomach since it does 'work' using a different driver. He's asked me to reinstall my whole OS which seems unreasonable. He then asked me to ship my laptop to them to replace the card... again, seems like a "last effort" scenario. We compromised on having me bring it to a service center.
So, before I go to the hassle of replacing one wifi card with another; Has is anyone else having similar problems? Does anyone else think it's a bit daft that a software driver issue must be fixed by installing new hardware? It seems to me that the problem is in convincing Windows that the card is powered on... I doubt a hardware swap will change anything.
Your thoughts? Suggestions?
Details...
7465-CTO (x200s, 1.86GHz, 4GB, Intel 5300)
Vista Business 64-bit
wifi driver v13.0.0.107 (complete failure)

Take a look at this wiki category: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Cat … English%29. I suggest the following from it: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Makepkg, http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ABS … ild_System, http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arc … _Standards

[solved] Intel 5300 slow network transfer speed

Heya,
I'm having trouble with my WiFi card Intel 5300 AGN and i hope you can help me.
It's the transfer speed in linux that bugs me. While I get 9 MB/s in Windows I can't for the life of me get more than 2.5 MB/s transfer rate in linux. And this is only if I use NFS4 and turn off the wifi power saving feature. Samba/CIFS gives me transfer speeds of no more than 0.4 MB/s.
The problem has to be somewhere in my linux software/configuration. But where?
I don't have much experience with WiFi configuration in Linux so mine should be pretty vanilla. No manual change of frequencies, channels and the likes. I simply use netcfg to connect and sometimes iwconfig to toggle the power saving feature.
Here's what iwconfig shows me right now while copying a big file:
wlan0 IEEE 802.11abgn ESSID:"bett"
Mode:Managed Frequency:2.412 GHz Access Point: 00:14:D1:C7:43:C4
Bit Rate=243 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off
Encryption key:off
Power Management:off
Link Quality=61/70 Signal level=-49 dBm
Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
Tx excessive retries:11922 Invalid misc:2 Missed beacon:0
As you can see, power management is disabled. The link quality is very good and the bit rate is at 243 Mbps (which should give me about 15 MBps right?). Yet the transfer rate is only 2 MBps, sometimes dropping as low as 0.7 MBps, sometimes spiking to 4.5 MBps for a second or two.
What can I do to improve my network speed?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
demian
Last edited by demian (2011-04-09 04:00:49)

Thanks for the reply zvxy.
I'm running the most current from [core], version 2.6.37.5-1.
Disabling the N mode improved transfer rates for CIFS/SMB shares. They are the same as with NFS now which is around 2.5 MB/s. Transfer speed for NFS stayed the same.
I'll try the kernel from [testing] and report back later.
// I've tested 2.6.38.2-1 a little bit now and as long as i don't disable wireless N i get transfer rates of up to 12 MB/s with NFS4. That's more than enough for me and i hope it stays that way. The downside is that transfer rate for CIFS is only 1 MB/s.
If i disable wireless n mode NFS transfer rates drop to ~2.8 MB/s while CIFS transfer rates go up to ~2.4 MB/s.
Guess I'll just have to stick with NFS (not that i don't mind but it's already thrown me some "stale" error messages with the new kernel ... i can't seem to catch a break ).
I'll consider this issue solved. Thanks!
Last edited by demian (2011-04-09 04:00:30)

Error code 10 for Intel 5300 Wireless Card

Hi,
I tried to install a new Intel 5300 Wireless Card in my Thinkpad T400.
However, it is not very successful.
After I installed the driver, I find a yellow exclamation point on the 5300 Wireless Card on the device manager and an error code 10 (can't start device).
I have tried to re-install the driver but still no luck.
Could anyone help for this?
Thanks a lot
Here is some information might be useful:
Operating System: Windows XP (SP3)
Driver download from Lenovo: http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?lndocid=MIGR-70504
Wireless Card bought from ebay (The seller said this card can support IBM/LENOVO T400).

Unless the card is a Lenovo Branded card, it won't work. But since you aren't complaining about an error in BIOS about an unauthorized card, then you also might have put it in the wrong slot.
Check the Hardware Maintenance Manual for your particular system and make sure you have it in the WLAN slot, not the WWAN slot.

WRT320N & Intel 5300, unable to connect.

Im having problem connecting when using encryption.
There are no problems with the wireless when im using no encryption.
I've tried WEP WPA/WPA2... Mixed mode, only B/G/N modes. 2.4/5Ghz tried to update driver for my Intel 5300 wireless card, also tried to downgrade driver... tried the XP wireless client and Intels Proset software.
I still get the issue where it starts to connect, and it says that its connected for about 3-4 seconds and then it "disconnects" itself.
If i set a static IP on my computer it stays connected to network even with encryption but i am unable to communicate with router trough wlan.
Router has the latest 1.0.02 firmware.
Any tips or tweaks to test?

How many wireless computers do you have ?
Are you getting on all the computers ?
You can try upgrading / reflashing the router's firmware.
Go to website linksysbycisco.com/downloads.........insert model no of your router in serach tab......select proper version of your router........download the firmware file......save that file on desktop
Follow these steps to upgrade the firmware on the device : -
Open an Internet Explorer browser page on a computer hard wired to the router...
In the address bar type - 192.168.1.1...Leave the Username blank & in Password use admin in lower case...
Click on the 'Administration' tab- Then click on the 'Firmware Upgrade' sub tab- Here click on 'Browse' and browse the .bin firmware file and click on "Upgrade"...
Wait for few seconds until it shows that "Upgrade is successful" After the firmware upgrade, click on "Reboot" and you will be returned back to the same page OR it will say "Page cannot be displayed".
Now reset your router :
Press and hold the reset button for 30 seconds...Release the reset button...Unplug the power cable from your router, wait for 30 seconds and re-connect the power cable...Now re-configure your router...
If your Internet Service Providor is Cable follow this link
If your Internet Service Providor is DSL follow this link

Difference between PC2 5300 and 5400?

Hello
I'm shopping for RAM at newegg and I came across G.SKill memory...they have two offerings of 1gig modules, one rated 5300 and the other 5400. The two are nearly identical in price and both are rated 667.
Can anyone tell me the differene between the two
Thanks
Hidé

I don't see any difference except for those 5300 and 5400 number, and on other online store sites the 5400 is sellable as an upgrade option for intel Mac.
Make sure you bought it from the site that stated clearly for Mac Book support and have an easy return policy if your memory fail or incompatible.
One other thing, I believe it only term of the memory manufacture categorized their product because the excact number are 667 x 8 = 5336 and the manufacture to put the number round it down to 5300
And on the other hand the pure 5400 contain chipset that runs at 675 mhz so 675 x 8 = 5400, but it downward compatible with 667 mhz. so it also save for your mac book

HO G62x Compatible Wifi Cards? Intel 5300?

Hi,
I'm looking to upgrade my wifi card since the one I got when I purchased my G62x doesn't give me the speed I need. I was looking and seems the Intel 5300 is a pretty good option and relativetly cheap on eBay, etc.
I noticed there's 3 connectors for antennas and the current one I have only has 2, it that a problem or incompatibility?
Thanks,
PS: I'm looking at some card that fully supoprts Wireless N, both 2.4 and 5Ghz and the highest data transfer rate, minimum 150mb/s.
Ray

rayvara wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to upgrade my wifi card since the one I got when I purchased my G62x doesn't give me the speed I need. I was looking and seems the Intel 5300 is a pretty good option and relativetly cheap on eBay, etc.
I noticed there's 3 connectors for antennas and the current one I have only has 2, it that a problem or incompatibility?
Thanks,
PS: I'm looking at some card that fully supoprts Wireless N, both 2.4 and 5Ghz and the highest data transfer rate, minimum 150mb/s.
Ray
Hi,
It's not as simple as it looks. Tell us what G62 model it is please and we can provide a list of compatible chips. One G62 (Intel Core i3/i5/i7) series has an Intel 5100agn listed as compatible. There also has to be the right form factor such as Half Mini PCIe, or Mini PCIe card.
Dv6-7000 /Full HD/Core i5-3360M/GF 650M/Corsair 8GB/Intel 7260AC/Samsung Pro 256GB
Testing - HP 15-p000
HP Touchpad provided by HP
Currently on Debian Wheeze
*Please, help other users with the same issue by marking your solved topics as "Accept as Solution"*

X301: Intel 5300 & WWAN Broadband Option Card

I just got my X301, which came with an Intel 5300 wireless card, and I went to install the AT&T 3G BroadBand Option currently being sold in the accessory store. So, turns out, the 5300 card is a full-size mini PCI-Express card... So is the 3G card. Yet, as far as I can tell, I can only hook up one full-size card, and I guess the other slot is for a half-size card. This is behind the memory door. What's the best course of action I can take?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Glad you got that installed.
The AT&T support page describing how to connect using Vista or using XP may be useful to you. AT&T Connection Manager and Access Connections are not necessary to make a connection.
I don't work for Lenovo. I'm a crazy volunteer!

D20 Blue Screen loading Windows 7-64bit using Intel controller and Marvell enabled

Hi, Help,
Hardware:
D20, 4158, Four 500GB Seagate SATA drives configured as a RAID10 1TB virtual disk (partitioned into five logical drives).
Goal:
Recover or repair a degraded RAID array.
I want to be able to launch Windows 7-64bit using the Intel controller and have it access the virtual disk of the degraded RAID array attached to the Marvell controller. Subsequently, I want to use the Marvell MRU utility to repair/recover the situation.
Situation/Issue:
Things ran well for two years and two months until yesterday. Now, when booting I see:
1962: No operating system found. Press F1 to repeat boot sequence.
If I use the Windows 7 installation CD and load the Marvell driver, the attempt to recover the operating system reports that the MBR is corrupt and cannot be repaired.
If I boot with the Marvell controller disabled in the D20 BIOS, using a Windows 7 installation (with Marvell drivers) attached to the Intel controller, everything works except (of course) I cannot access the RAID drives.
If I reboot with the Marvell controller enabled, using the same Windows 7 installation via Intel controller, I see a "Starting Windows" announcement followed by a flash of the blue screen of death.
The BSOD message is unspecific, no error code, just...
"A problem has been detected and Windows has been shut down to prevent damage to your computer.
If this is the first time you've seen this Stop error screen,
restart your computer..."
Additional information:
If I access the Marvell BIOS (ctrl-M) and look at Devices, one of the four Seagate drives has status FREE instead of status ASSIGNED. If I run the Marvell BIOS verify disk utility diagnosic on that FREE status disk, I get a fault error after about 30 minutes of scanning. So, one Seagate disk is sour and somehow the MBR was corrupted at the same time.
History:
Two years ago, during the intial configuration, I could access the Marvell RAID disks from this Intel-controller-booted Windows 7 installation, but my fuzzy memory is that I had to change something in the D20 BIOS, such as the AHCI setting or similar.
Status:
Today, using the Intel controller to boot Windows 7 with the Marvell controller enabled is just BSOD. What am I missing or failing to do or set?
Thank you in advance for any help and ideas.
-John
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Update:
I replaced the 500GB Seagate disk with a new 500GB Seagate. I ran the Marvell BIOS verify disk utility on the new disk drive and it passed with no errors. Following the steps given in the Marvell MRU online help, I rebuilt the virtual disk. Upon completion (which took a little more than an hour to complete), I rebooted. Before the Seagate disk went south yesterday, the Marvell virtual disk contained one primary partition (C, and four NTFS drives (D:, E:, F:, and Z. Now it contains three primary NTFS drives (C:, F:, and Z. An extended partition contains D: (an unformatted volume of size 199.30MB) and an unused space of 199.30GB.
Event log:
Looking at the event log, Windows reports that the disk in question raised a warning yesterday. Three messages share the same timestamp (all from mv64xx (a Marvell process):
"Physical disk 16 is plugged out."
"Virtual disk 0 is degraded."
"Physical disk 16 is plugged in."
Eight seconds later, UserPnp logs:
"Driver Management has concluded the process to add Service disk for Device Instance ID SCSI\DISK&VEN_SEAGATE&PROD_ST3500418AS&REV_CC38\5&248BBE23&0&000100 with the following status: 0"
One second later, UserPnp logs:
"Driver Management concluded the process to install driver FileRepository\disk.inf_amd64_neutral_10ce25bbc5a9cc43\disk.inf for Device Instance ID SCSI\DISK&VEN_SEAGATE&PROD_ST3500418AS&REV_CC38\5&248BBE23&0&000100 with the following status: 0x0."
Questions:
Is it possible that UserPnp corrupted the Marvell virtual disk after an intermittent physical disk unplugged/plugged-in event that happened when the Seagate hardware went failed. It looks to me like my D: and E: are toast despite RAID 10.
Any ideas? Is there anyway to recover the Marvell virtual disk configuration to the state prior to the hardware failure? If not, what good is RAID 10?
My apologies for the long posting, but I am an old software guy who does not understand the intricacies of RAID and disk management.
Thank you in advance for any leads toward a solution,
-John

HI, I HAVE A MacBook Pro 2.3GHz dual-core Intel i5 AND I WAN'T TO UPGRADE THE HARD DRIVE UP TO 750GB AND ALSO THE RAM MEMORY TO 8GB. WHAT SPECIFIC MODEL OF HARD DRIVE AND RAM MEMORY SHOULD I BUY??? THANKS

HI, I HAVE A MacBook Pro 2.3GHz dual-core Intel i5 AND I WAN'T TO UPGRADE THE HARD DRIVE UP TO 750GB AND ALSO THE RAM MEMORY TO 8GB. WHAT SPECIFIC MODEL OF HARD DRIVE AND RAM MEMORY SHOULD I BUY??? THANKS

No need to type in all caps - we HEAR you!
I would take a look at the internal drives offered by both Crucial (click the link "Internal Hard Drives Now Available") and OWC. I would stay away from Western Digital drives as they seem to have problems on a number of Mac models.
You can also shop for RAM at Crucial and OWC - just select the System Scanner tab at the Crucial website to find out which memory is right for your machine.
Good luck,
Clinton

My itunes opens after 2-3 hrs after doubleclicking it to open;it happened once or twice with itunes 11.x , but its a constant problem after updating itunes to 12.x ....my operating system win7;processor i5 intel haswell and 4gb ram...i hav no issue

My itunes opens 2-3 hrs after doubleclicking it to open;it happened once or twice with itunes 11.x , but its a constant problem after updating itunes to the latest 12.0.1....my operating system windows7;processor i5 intel haswell and 4gb ram...i have no issue with opening other big programs....i tried uninstalling completely the itunes and reinstalling it as i thought at first it is not opening (because it takes really long time) and i followed the following support pages
1)iTunes for Windows Vista, Windows 7, or Windows 8: Fix unexpected quits or launch issues
2)iTunes for Windows doesn't open after upgrading in Windows Vista, Windows 7, or Windows 8
but my problem doesnot get solved even after trying all the methods in the above pages...
now i realized,it opens after 2-3 hrs and at will...after opening it keeps hanging.finally it doesnot again open immediately after closing...kindly help me out as soon as possible

My itunes opens 2-3 hrs after doubleclicking it to open;it happened once or twice with itunes 11.x , but its a constant problem after updating itunes to the latest 12.0.1....my operating system windows7;processor i5 intel haswell and 4gb ram...i have no issue with opening other big programs....i tried uninstalling completely the itunes and reinstalling it as i thought at first it is not opening (because it takes really long time) and i followed the following support pages
1)iTunes for Windows Vista, Windows 7, or Windows 8: Fix unexpected quits or launch issues
2)iTunes for Windows doesn't open after upgrading in Windows Vista, Windows 7, or Windows 8
but my problem doesnot get solved even after trying all the methods in the above pages...
now i realized,it opens after 2-3 hrs and at will...after opening it keeps hanging.finally it doesnot again open immediately after closing...kindly help me out as soon as possible

Intel WiDi and Miracast

I have an HP Pavillion g6-2010nr Notebook PC . It's came with Windows 7. I want to use a wireless display adapter to wirelessly display (mirror) my laptop screen on TV. It requires that my laptop be "Intel WiDi and Miracast" enabled. Is my laptop Intel WiDi and Miracast enabled? Do I have to install something? or can Windows 7 not do it? If Windows 7 can do it, how do I get it to connect? I know on Windows 8 there is a project option that allows you to connect to a TV, but I'm not sure where to find that option on Windows 7. I am a newbie, so the more details... the better.
Thanks
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hi,
No. The following specs shows it does not meet WiDi requirements:
http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?cc=us&lc=en&docname=c03377517
BUT if you wish, please use the following tool to confirm:
http://supportkb.intel.com/wireless/wireless-display/templates/selfservice/intelwidi/#portal/1026/ar...
Regards.
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

Intel 5300 and barebone 1646 gt640

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for