Intel boot cd Solaris 8

If you have problems creating the bootable cds from the downloadable Solaris 8 free files, you will see in the forum, the image provided for Solaris 8 is already an iso image. You need only burn the file as an image (not as a bootable cd). Have fun.

All of these messages are all quite normal solaris kernel
status messages (because you've booted with verbose "-v"
kernel messages).
Hmm, it has detected your IDE harddisc (SAMSUNG, 6.5GB)
as the slave device on the primary IDE channel (there were
probably more messages before that SAMSUNG hard disc
where it recognized the master device on the primary IDE
channel; there is a device connected as master on the
primary ide channel, right?).
And it has detected your ATAPI CDROM (COMPAQ SCR-3232)
on the secondary IDE channel, as the master device.
Is there a slave device present on the secondary IDE
channel? (probably not, otherwise it would appear
before the "PCI-device: ide@1, ata1" line).
Hmm, the next step is probably that the kernel scans for
SCSI controllers. Do you have any SCSI controllers in that
system? (It might hang probing for some SCSI controller)
Assuming there are no SCSI controllers, the next step
of the kernel would probably to look for disk drives on each
of the disk controllers. (So, it might hang talking to your
IDE hard disc drives)
Is the HDD LED active when the system is frozen?
Perhaps you get some real error messages when you wait a
minute or two?
If you temporarily remove the power connector from both of
the IDE hard discs on the primary IDE channel (so that the
only IDE device is the CDROM), and you boot again with
"b kadb -v", is it still hanging after:
model COMPAQ SCR-3232, stat 50, err 0
cfg 0x85c0, cyl 0, hd 0, sec/trk 0
mul1 0x0, mult2 0x0, dwcap 0x0, cap 0xf00
piomode 0x200, dmamode 0x200, advpiomode 0x3
minpio 120, minpioflow 120
valid 0x2, dwdma 0x407, majver 0x0
PCI-device: ide@1, ata1
ata1 is /pci@0, 0/pci-ide@0,1/ide@1

Similar Messages

  • Solaris 8 for intel boot disk.

    My Solaris 8 for intel boot disk was delivered to me corrupted and will not boot in serveral of my machines, how do I go about creating another one or should I request a replacement. Thanks.

    Hi
    This is Raghu from Hyderabad, India
    you can download bootdisk creation files from following site.
    http://soldc.sun.com/support/drivers/dca_diskettes/
    try in with this URL it may be help you out.
    please give me reply
    Raghu

  • Ultra 24 and Intel Boot Agent

    I recently purchased a Sun Ultra 24, my first foray into the Intel + Solaris arena.
    The machine has performed flawlessly with a number of x86 operating systems, and the BIOS has seemed rock-solid.
    Yesterday, I decided that I would reduce the BIOS boot time by disabling the PXE Boot, by using the BIOS menu option to do so. Following that change, the various operating systems I've tried cannot enumerate or activate the e1000 NIC. I did attempt to re-enable the PIX option in the BIOS, although the IBA doesn't appear any longer unless I reset the defaults with ibautil from DOS. The defaults reset doesn't survive beyond a reboot (the process is: boot using CD containing DOS and the intel proboot utils, execute ibautil -all -defcfg, reboot.) At that point, the menu is present and everything is back to normal. If I again reboot, the IBA menu doesn't appear during POST/boot and I cannot get the e1000 to function an OS.
    Thank you for your time, and any feedback you may be able to offer.
    UPDATE: I went ahead and did something rather unorthodox: On a hunch, I invoked ibautil with the option to enable the boot menu, believing this would force invocation of the IBA and enumeration of the NIC. It does, and the NIC does display activity and link lights at the rear (which it previously wasn't doing following the disabling of IBA in the BIOS). At POST, the IBA does say that it cannot continue due to a corrupt configuration (which I can eliminate with -defcfg, even though defcfg doesn't "stick" beyond a reboot). So, the NIC is working, but I believe the root issue is in being able to access the IBA menu with the option enabled in the BIOS. The IBA menu apparently is set to disabled within the ctrl-s config menu, and with zero seconds wait, which I cannot access to change. As a result, the NIC doesn't initialize at POST, leaving it dead for all practical purposes.
    If any of you know how to re-initialize the IBA ctrl-s properties so as to display ctrl-s normally without the volatile, non-lasting ibautil -defcfg, and without a BIOS update (Sun hasn't released one for this model, yet) I'd love to know how.
    Thanks again, and hopefully this provides some insight into what to avoid when configuring the IBA and e1000 nic on this machine. Hopefully any answers will lead to the solution for those that have run into the issue.
    Edited by: tenex on Dec 28, 2007 4:57 PM

    I also have this problem, but I don't know how it happened. The machine came with Solaris 10 installed and the network interface worked fine. Then I wiped the machine and installed Solaris Express 01/08 and it worked fine. Then from the GRUB boot menu I booted to "Sun xVM Hipervisor" out of curiosity. It booted into Solaris Express, but the network was no longer available (not even listed in ifconfig -a). From that point onward this computer doesn't think it has a network card in it. I've reintalled the OS, tried Indiana builds, etc. The OS installers don't ask me network questions anymore, and people on the install-discuss (solaris) mailing list tell me that it means no network interface was detected.
    From the BIOS's Advanced/Integrated Devices screen I see that "GbE Controller" is Enabled, and "GbE LAN Boot" is Enabled. When I try to access the Intel Management Engine Bios (CTRL-P at boot), it asks me for a password! I don't know what the password is, and it is not mentioned in the manual.
    I don't like the idea of shipping the computer back because I'll just get an other one with the same problem. I guess it's time to call Sun and get some help.
    Edited by: rdelaplante on Feb 17, 2008 4:45 AM

  • Help, unable to boot clean Solaris 10 install

    I use Solaris at work, but have never done any sysadmin.
    I have installed Solaris 10 on a new Intel Core2 Duo machine at home, but when I select Solaris 10 (not failsafe) from GRUB2, my machine reboots right after the "Use is subject to license terms", and goes back to GRUB2.
    I can boot to the failsafe prompt, but I don't know how to troubleshoot from there.
    What I've been able to find online suggests that I turn off ACPI (tried with no luck) and disable USB legacy mode in bios (again, tried with no luck). I'm using an IDE DVD drive to install, and a SATA drive for the OS, so everything is installed on c1d0, not c0d0.
    When I run failsafe, it finds Solaris 10 ... X86 on c1d0s0 and I can attach as read/write, but I'm not sure what to do from there to find out why GRUB can't load the OS.
    I've tried the Solaris 0606 Test Check CD, which says there are drivers for my complete system except for the audio (no driver) and the network (third party, I haven't bothered to get yet).
    Please help, I'm totally stuck!
    Thanks in advance,
    Brett

    enemix-
    Sorry, I meant to say GRUB stage 2, not GRUB 2. I'm using the GRUB that came with solaris 0606. GRUB works fine.
    mAbrante -
    Tried the halt_on_panic=1, had no effect. I'm really not sure what is causing the problem. I've found that if I boot 32 bit mode by editing the GRUB command to append kernel/unix I can boot into solaris. But I'd sure like to be able to boot into 64 bit mode.
    Any more thoughts anyone?
    Brett

  • Dual boot with Solaris 8.0 and Windows 98

    I am interested in Setting up my pc with with a Dual boot of Solaris 8 and Windows 98. I have a 60 GB hard drive that I am going to make two 30 GB primary Partitions on this hard dive. One with Windows 98 and one with Solaris 8 Intel Platform version. The question that I have, Is this particular Setup doable? And if so can you tell me what order they have to be installed and what partition software I should use for this procedure. Also if i missing procedure please be very detailed in explaining this to me. I read the message board was confused.
    If need be please email me at [email protected]

    Hey, goto http://math.uwb.edu.pl/~mariusz/dualboot/ and that will answer all your dual boot questions ?
    i2l2

  • Dual booting between Solaris 8 and 10

    Hi,
    We mostly use Solaris 8 for testing which means I can't uninstall it. How would I be able to dual boot both Solaris 8 and 10 on a SUN SPARC machine? Is there a boot loader available like grub?
    Please help.
    Thanks alot!
    Till later,
    Joseph.

    SPARC doesn't need a split boot loader like BIOS/x86. The OBP can directly load from any slice. So 'boot disk:a' would boot from slice 0 and 'boot disk:g' would boot from slice 6.
    Darren

  • Solaris 10 for Intel - boot from floppydisk

    Does anybody has an idea wheter it is possible to boot solaris 10 from floppydisk for installing the OS.
    We have systems that cannot boot from ethernet/cdrom but we would like to use/install solaris 10 on these systems.

    It is possible to start the installation (boot from) a floppy disk, using
    a "DCA" (device configuration assistant) floppy diskette.
    A 1.44MB DCA floppy image can be found on CD 2/4 or the DVD, in
    the subdirectory .../Solaris_10/Tools, file d1_image. Write it to a
    blank floppy media using the Unix "dd" or the MSDOS "rawrite.exe"
    utility.
    After you start the boot process from the DCA floppy, you must
    either use a CDROM / DVDROM device as the boot device for the
    Solaris installation, or an NFS installation (server using a supported
    NIC in the client; 3Com 3c905, Intel Pro/100, or Dec 21x4x do work).

  • Dual OS system booting issue - Solaris with Windows XP Pro

    Hi,
    I have installed Windows XP Professional with SP2 on my laptop Dell Inspiron 6400 (Intel Core 2 Duo). I created partition as below,
    C: 25GB (Primary : Active) Installed XP
    D: 15GB (Primary) - Tried to install Solaris here
    F: 10GB (Primary)
    G: 20 GB (Logical)
    H: 20 GB (Logical)
    1. I tried to install Solaris 10, booted up system from DVD and selected Solaris. I got a message related to "License..." and it stopped right there, nothing showed up on screen after the message. I forced it to shutdown.
    2. Next, I tried with Solaris Express Developer edition DVD. I was able to proceed until "Install" option. After clicking "Install" button, it reported some account name(no account name found) setting problem and quitted from installation. It asked to remove the DVD manually. But I was not able to eject it, got stuck. I switched off it and removed DVD.
    When I bootup the system next time from HDD or CD or USB bootable backup, it showed blank screen and blinking cursor. I am not able to boot system with Win XP or USB Win Xp bootable. I am able to enter BIOS setup.
    Please let me know how to boot up Win Xp and install Solaris with it.

    with my little experience i find solaris 10 isn't able to install on sata hdd but with solaris express edition 5.11 i was able to install it on my lap top toshiba tecra and now i can boot with xp sp2 and solaris i hope this answer your question .

  • Micro Channel Boot diskette Solaris 2.6

    Whe can I get this - "Solaris 2.6 (Intel Platform Edition) Device Configuration Assistant Microchannel verion (MCA)"
    Thanks,
    Richard

    The link wasn't active when I went to it, but here's info from their 2.6 Release Notes:
    System With a Micro Channel Architecture
    The Solaris 2.6 (Intel Platform Edition) distribution CD is accompanied by a boot diskette supporting most systems, including those with ISA, EISA, VLB, and PCI buses. If you have a system with a Micro Channel Architecture (MCA), you may download a boot diskette from Sun's Solaris 2.6 Web site:
    � http://access1.sun.com/solaris/distrib2.6
    Full instructions for downloading and creating the MCA diskette are on the Web site. You may also obtain the diskette through your Sun Software Support Provider.
    You must make certain that the boot diskette is not write-protected because configuration information is saved to the diskette during the initial boot.

  • Canot boot properly :solaris 10

    hi,
    I am new in solaris , I just insatll solaris 10 . My comp. configiration is intel(32bit )
    P-4 2.26Ghz
    RAM 256MB
    there was no prob when i was installed it , but when it boot it shows
    MEG singnal is failed . but my BIOS sttings it has VGA . Then the message No singal Frequency ,power managemet . then the monitor is off . My monitor type 700B . I increase the the CPU frequency from BIOS . But same effect .Pls helpme for that .
    partha

    yes,
    After 1 st time instalation, the system will boot automatically, then it ask for Confifigure the Xorg or Xserver like that , you can see it in text mode. On that time you just select change ( I think you have to press "F4 " for that) then ' F2 " . then change of resolution will appear, then change it , i think in general if you set "800/600" or 1024 /768 then it will work, if you have any problem then write me...
    thanks
    Partha

  • Can xhost be added to boot in Solaris

    Xhost + is needed for the reports server to function. Up to now we have been manually running this command since our SA says it cannot be run automatically upon boot. This manual approach has caused problems when the server reboots at odd times and the root user is not available to run the xhost, leading to the reports server not working properly.
    Is it possible to run the xhost + as part of the boot process? The environment is Solaris 8. -quinn

    Hi, I suggest reading this document, it's easy:
    http://qwuh.no-ip.com/oracle/index.html
    It's contains all you need for this!
    Greetings from Palma!

  • Problem booting a Solaris 10 x86 after Jumpstart Installation

    Hi,
    I have a strange problem. I have a working x86 machine with Solaris 10 installed. I have made a flash image of it's hard disk, and I have store thar flar on another machine. I have another Solaris 10 with Jumpstart.
    I boot other x86 machine through PXE. The Jumpstart machine gives it a valid IP, and the process of sending the flash image begins. The process finish, and the client machine reboots. And here is the strange problem:
    When starting, the Grub men� appears, and shows the two options configured: first, start Solaris in normal mode, and second, failsafe.
    If I choose normal start, the screen goes black and the machine restart as if you rebooted it. I can only start in failsafe mode.
    Here are the config files in Jumpstart for that machine:
    Profile:
    install_type flash_install
    archive_location nfs 10.95.8.7:/export/backup/platform/alba-ucm/ALBA-UCM-HostID_2b72c461_4x80GbMirror-Prepared_09042008.flar
    partitioning explicit
    filesys c0t0d0s0 1:2650 /
    filesys c0t0d0s1 2651:1600 /var
    filesys c0t0d0s3 4251:400 swap
    filesys c0t0d0s4 4651:1000 /opt/app
    filesys c0t0d0s5 5651:3143 /repositoryCC
    filesys c0t0d0s6 8794:100 /tmp
    filesys c0t0d0s7 8894:26
    filesys c0t2d0s0 1:8093 /datos
    filesys c0t2d0s1 8094:800 /DBoracle
    filesys c0t2d0s7 8894:26
    After Script:
    touch /a/etc/notrouter
    touch /a/noautoshutdown
    sync
    echo "Changing and syncing bootenv.rc"
    # clear the boot-args property
    echo "setprop boot-args ''" >> /a/boot/solaris/bootenv.rc
    # set the bootpath property to boot from the hard disk
    STRING=`df | grep '^/a '� | sed 's/).*//' | sed 's/^.* (//'`
    STRING=`ls -l ${STRING}`
    MYROOT=`echo $STRING | sed 's/.*..\/..\/devices//'`
    echo "setprop bootpath ${MYROOT}" >> /a/boot/solaris/bootenv.rc
    # disable kdmconfig from running after the first reboot
    sysidconfig -b /a -r /usr/openwin/bin/kdmconfig
    sync
    And here is the menu.lst for Grub:
    title Solaris 10
    root (hd0,0,a)
    kernel /platform/i86pc/multiboot
    module /platform/i86pc/boot_archive
    title Solaris Failsafe
    kernel /boot/multiboot kernel/unix -s
    module /boot/x86.miniroot-safe
    Please, any idea about what may be hapening?

    Thanks for your answers.
    Yes, both machines have the same hardware exactly. Finally, I could find where the problem was.
    The file bootenv.rc, for some reason that I don't know, was corrupted: In it there was a correct line with bootpath variable correctly defined, but, at the end of the file, there was another line setting the bootpath variable to a long and incoherent string of chars. Booting in failsafe, mounting the system in /a, and removing that stupid line from the bootenv.rc, solved the problem.

  • Installing WLS on an Intel-pentium using Solaris

    Has anyone installed WLS on an intel-pentium pc running Solaris ? Although
    it appears that it is a supported combination, I did see a note that said
    "it was in the radar". Is there an official line on this ?

    It is not supported.
    The platform support page for WebLogic Server is located at:
    http://www.weblogic.com/platforms/index.html
    This page has the latest and greatest information on the platforms that
    WebLogic is certified and supported on.
    Thanks,
    Michael
    Michael Girdley
    BEA Systems
    Learning WebLogic? http://learnweblogic.com
    Buy the only book covering J2EE & WebLogic 6:
    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0130911119/learnweblogic/102-1778325-
    4765749
    "Daniel Hoppe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..
    Hi,
    Has anyone installed WLS on an intel-pentium pc running
    Solaris ? Although
    it appears that it is a supported combination, I did see a
    note that said
    "it was in the radar". Is there an official line on this ?
    Yepp, we tried that as a test setup. Works, but I think we did not have
    native IO running.
    Daniel

  • Error messages during booting of Solaris 8 zone

    I have installed a Solaris 8 zone from a flash archive of a Solaris 8 server that is currently in production. I get no errors during the installation of the zone and when I boot the zone I get the following messages on the zone console:
    SunOS Release 5.8 Version Generic_Virtual 64-bit
    Copyright 1983-2000 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved
    Hostname: madison1xl
    The system is coming up. Please wait.
    NIS domainname is eam.rjf.com
    operation failed, Not owner
    device name given is not a stream device (No such device or address)
    device name given is not a stream device (No such device or address)
    device name given is not a stream device (No such device or address)
    device name given is not a stream device (No such device or address)
    device name given is not a stream device (No such device or address)
    device name given is not a stream device (No such device or address)
    device name given is not a stream device (No such device or address)
    device name given is not a stream device (No such device or address)
    device name given is not a stream device (No such device or address)
    device name given is not a stream device (No such device or address)
    device name given is not a stream device (No such device or address)
    device name given is not a stream device (No such device or address)
    device name given is not a stream device (No such device or address)
    device name given is not a stream device (No such device or address)
    device name given is not a stream device (No such device or address)
    device name given is not a stream device (No such device or address)
    operation failed, Not owner
    operation failed, Not owner
    operation failed, Not owner
    operation failed, Not owner
    operation failed, Not owner
    operation failed, Not owner
    operation failed, Not owner
    operation failed, Not owner
    operation failed, Not owner
    operation failed, Not owner
    Sun BluePrints network security settings applied.
    syslog service starting.
    I am not sure what is causing these errors. The zone appears to be running properly, but I am concerned that something is not starting during the boot process. /var/adm/messages file does not show any errors. Thanks for any help you can give me.

    Thanks. That helped alot. I found out that all the messages came from a start up script named nddconfig. Since the ngz cannot change anything about devices this was causing a lot of errors. I stopped the script from starting and now do not receive any errors.

  • Created zone with defaults won't boot completely (Solaris 10, Update 1)

    If I create a zone with defaults, i.e. allowing the zone to inherit the typical package dirs, the resulting zone does not boot completely. When I attach to the zone via zlogin, the zone looks to be in an administrative state. It never boots to a point where one would typically enter in the initial configuration info, e.g. timezone and root password.
    However if I create the zone after first removing the inherited dirs, the zone boots to a state where it subsequently can be confiured and fully booted.
    Looks as if the SMF facilities are not fully initialized when the zone is configured to inherit its packages. This could be a red herring as I'm a newbie who's moved over from Linux and starting to understand SMF specifically and Solaris in general.
    I did not have this problem with Solaris 10. I've just installed Solaris 10 Update 1; the problem seems specific to that installation. I reinstalled and the problem persists.

    I snipped the output because there were some errors, which on retrospect seems to have been a silly decision. I repeated the process and captured the missing output:
    # zoneadm -z foo install
    Preparing to install zone <foo>.
    Creating list of files to copy from the global zone.
    Copying <5913> files to the zone.
    Initializing zone product registry.
    Determining zone package initialization order.
    Preparing to initialize <942> packages on the zone.
    Initialized <942> packages on zone.
    Zone <foo> is initialized.
    Installation of <1> packages was skipped.
    Installation of these packages generated warnings: <SUNWxwfnt
    SUNWxwplt SUNWxwcft SUNWjxmft SUNWxwpls SUNWpmowu
    SUNWxilrl SUNWolrte SUNWi13rf SUNWi15rf SUNWi2rf SUNWi5rf
    SUNWi7rf SUNWi9rf SUNWtxfnt SUNWdoc SUNWi1of SUNWi4rf
    SUNWi8rf SUNW1251f SUNWarrf SUNWxwoft SUNWxwxst
    SUNWkoi8f SUNWasu SUNWxrpcrt SUNWasac SUNWasdb
    SUNWasut>
    The file </zone/foo/root/var/sadm/system/logs/install_log> contains a log of the zone installation.The packages are related to App development and X11. I don't see any that might be related to SMF.
    The logfile is too large to post at over 37K lines. However there seemed to be a pattern to the package failures. Hopefully these greps highlight the important messages:
    # grep "partially failed" /zone/foo/root/var/sadm/system/logs/install_log
    Installation of <SUNWxwfnt> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWxwplt> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWxwcft> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWjxmft> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWxwpls> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWpmowu> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWxilrl> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWolrte> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi13rf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi15rf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi2rf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi5rf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi7rf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi9rf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWtxfnt> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWdoc> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi1of> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi4rf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWi8rf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNW1251f> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWarrf> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWxwoft> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWxwxst> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWkoi8f> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWasu> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWxrpcrt> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWasac> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWasdb> on zone <foo> partially failed.
    Installation of <SUNWasut> on zone <foo> partially failed.and# grep "not installed" /zone/foo/root/var/sadm/system/logs/install_log
    *** package <SPROmrdwf> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROdwrfb> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROlang> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROlangx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROdwrfx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROsbld> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROsbldx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROrdbkb> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROrdbkx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROcc> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROutool> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrcc> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrcom> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmr3m> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrtcv> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROm9xs> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROsunms> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROsmsx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROsmpx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrsbe> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROsbe> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROpnsn> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROfd> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROupdck> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROcpl> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROcplx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROcmpl> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROtlbn7> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROtll7> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROtl7x> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROtll7x> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROscl> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROsclx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrstd> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrcpl> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROstl4h> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROstl4a> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROstl4o> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROstl4x> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROstl4y> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROftool> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROl90> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROl90x> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROl90s> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROl90sx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROf90> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrftn> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROgc> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROlgc> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROgcx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROlgcx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROdbx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROdbxx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROjdbx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROjdbxx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrdbx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROdemo> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROdmake> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrdmk> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROtdemo> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmride> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROdbxui> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROsvc> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROxdplg> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROidext> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROjnsnb> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROjnsrt> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROjnsup> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROctags> was not installed:
    *** package <SUNWnbide> was not installed:
    *** package <SUNWnbcpp> was not installed:
    *** package <SUJAnbcpp> was not installed:
    *** package <SUZHnbcpp> was not installed:
    *** package <SUNWexted> was not installed:
    *** package <SUJAexted> was not installed:
    *** package <SUZHexted> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROnbreg> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROfdxd> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrxd> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROgvim> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROxmbin> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROxmshr> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROxmsrc> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrxm> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROprfan> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrpan> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROprfax> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROprflb> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROprflx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROprfgn> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrpgn> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROhtbas> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROhttl7> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROhtstd> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROhtxd> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROdwrfs> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROrdbks> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROctsrc> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROplg> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROpl> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROplx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROpls> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROplsx> was not installed:
    *** package <SPROmrpl> was not installed:These messages seem to be inline with the general output captured from the zone install itself.
    > What does "svcadm list -vc" give you when you started the zone ?
    I took that as a typo, instead using "zoneadm?"
    # zoneadm list -vc
      ID NAME             STATUS         PATH
       0 global           running        /
       7 foo              running        /zone/fooThe zone is not on its own slice, however "/zone" is mounted as a loopback from /export/zone. I don't think that's a problem since the zone install seems to work if I don't inherit packages. Unless perhaps its a nesting level of lofs's.
    FWIW,
    # mount |grep zone
    /zone on /export/zone read/write/setuid/devices/dev=1540000 on Fri Feb 24 16:10:55 2006
    /zone/foo/root/dev on /zone/foo/dev read/write/setuid/devices/zonedevfs/dev=4640007 on Tue Feb 28 13:13:03 2006
    /zone/foo/root/lib on /lib read only/setuid/nodevices/nosub/dev=dc0440 on Tue Feb 28 13:13:03 2006
    /zone/foo/root/platform on /platform read only/setuid/nodevices/nosub/dev=dc0440 on Tue Feb 28 13:13:03 2006
    /zone/foo/root/sbin on /sbin read only/setuid/nodevices/nosub/dev=dc0440 on Tue Feb 28 13:13:03 2006
    /zone/foo/root/usr on /usr read only/setuid/nodevices/nosub/dev=dc0440 on Tue Feb 28 13:13:03 2006
    /zone/foo/root/proc on proc read/write/setuid/nodevices/zone=foo/dev=4400007 on Tue Feb 28 13:13:06 2006
    /zone/foo/root/system/contract on ctfs read/write/setuid/nodevices/zone=foo/dev=43c0008 on Tue Feb 28 13:13:06 2006
    /zone/foo/root/etc/svc/volatile on swap read/write/setuid/nodevices/xattr/zone=foo/dev=448000e on Tue Feb 28 13:13:06 2006
    /zone/foo/root/etc/mnttab on mnttab read/write/setuid/nodevices/zone=foo/dev=4440008 on Tue Feb 28 13:13:06 2006

Maybe you are looking for

  • Duplicates in Address Book?

    Every time I edit or add info to a contact on my address book, it makes a duplicate... How do I fix this... It does it on my iPhone 4s and on my ipad 2...

  • Oracle.DataAccess.Client - DbProviderFactories.GetFactory

    Hello I was inspired by this article http://www.oracle.com/technology/oramag/oracle/06-winsupp/win06odp.html And been trying to switch my project over from "System.Data.OracleClient" (seems like it's not friendly with TransactionScope) to ODP.NET "Or

  • FindBy method in CMP

    Hi I would like to know if there is a way of get case insensitive results from database using CMP findBy methods ? Thanks Lavanya

  • Restricted access to a folder

    Hi, all I have in Designer Collaboration ( cfolders) one structure of folders similar to the following: Main Folder             Public Folder             Restrict Folder And  this is my problem: I have  that in the Public folder is general informatio

  • Does not import ORF raw files

    Photo's does not support Olympus ORF raw files. At least not the latest M5 MkII camera raw files. Its a brand new program why is it not up to date with Oly raw files.