Intel Haswell GPU acceleration in CC?

Has anyone tried Intel Haswell integrated graphics chips for GPU acceleration in Adobe Premiere Pro CC? If so: cigar? No cigar?
(I realize Haswell is neither supported nor is anywhere in the same performance bracket with discrete desktop GPUs from AMD and NVidia, and clearly isn't going to make you return your GTX-Titan. Just curious if GPU acceleration is at all possible given Haswell's hardware support for OpenCL and other neat tricks.)

Premiere Pro CC cannot use Intel graphics for hardware acceleration.
Guess things change pretty fast in Adobe town...
GPU acceleration on Premiere Pro CC with Iris Pro (Windows) - Dave Helmly, Intel Developer's Conference (I think), August 2013.
GPU acceleration in Premiere Pro CC on rMPB with Intel Iris (not Pro) - can anyone with an rMBP and Iris confirm this?

Similar Messages

[SOLVED] Boot Resolution with Intel Haswell GPU and KMS

Dear All,
This thread is a follow up of this one: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=189562. I created a new thread as I think the focus of the problem has shifted and the old title might be misleading and lead to helpful people ignoring the thread. I hope this is ok. Please correct me if I did not behave correctly.
I think most of the "flashes" I see come from X switching from native resolution (3200x1800) which is used when starting, to 1920x1080, which I set in the configuration file.
So my question is: how can I have the 1920x1080 resolution at boot (i.e. during early boot, using the KMS and including the i915 driver in mkinitcipo?):
I tried:
1) Creating the configuration file in xorg.conf.d and including it into the mkinicpio
2) Setting the GRUB_GFX_MODE
3) Using the EDID method (with built-in resolution 1920x1080) as described here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ke … s_and_EDID
4) Using uvesafb as described in the WIKI: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/uvesafb
Nothing worked. X starts during boot always with the same native resolution, the switches to 1920x1080 when GDM starts. Can you please suggest a method to set the boot resolution? It is for sure technically possible as Ubuntu does it when installed on the same hardware.. I think I just haven't found a way...
Valerio
Last edited by valmar (2014-11-10 15:15:07)

Ok, answering my own question, it would appear that adding video=1920x1080 does the trick. However, I still see a lot of flashing (I think that people call it flickering)

GPU acceleration fix for Dell Intel and Nvidia chipsets with external monitor?

I have a Dell XPS laptop with both integrated Intel chips and Nvidia chips and I can only get the GPU acceleration to work when I don't have any external monitors plugged in.
Is there some way I can get Illustrator to enable the Nvidia GPU and stop being confused by multiple chipsets on external monitors? I really like the live zoom.

same problem here,
'm getting a little frustrated trying to get my laptop working with my LG DLP 3D ready projector to display in 3D. The projector itself will work in 3D as long as the resolution is 1024x768@120hz and the laptop's NVidia GTX 770M should have no issues driving the projector with this resolution.
Where it seems like the problems occur is Intel HD 4600 graphics driver gets in the way every time i try to run anything 3D, the software Im using to run any 3D type files do not recognize the projector as a 3D capable device because all the laptop is using is the Intel HD 4600 graphics.
If I could somehow turn off the Intel graphics and just force the laptop to just use the NVidia card I think all my issues will go away. I just am not having success in doing this.
I have tried to go into the NVidia control panel and under 3D settings pick the software program that runs my 3D files and tell it to use the NVidia card...but it never works.
I think everything is sent through the Intel graphics card regardless if the laptop is using the NVidia card (just guessing here)?
I also tried to simply uninstall the drivers but that did not work,
I also tried to disable the Intel graphics but it then went into some type of generic display driver mode and still would not work.
I also went into the BIOS to look for any settings that would allow me to disable the Intel graphics card ..no luck, could not find any settings for this.
Can someone help me with this? how can I disable the Intel graphics and force the laptop to just use the NVidia card all the time?
Thanks!!

GPU Acceleration in Photoshop (Intel GMA 4500MHD)

Does Intel GMA 4500MHD support GPU acceleration in Adobe Photoshop CS4?
(According to recommendation about OpenGL and Shared Model this GPU should support it, but Intel GPUs are not included in Adobe list of supported GPUs at all and I have found 2 posts on web mentioning it does not). What size of RAM in this case is needed? How it works with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470?
Thank you.

Check the Photoshop forum.
Bob

How do I know if I have Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (OpenCL)?

To anyone who can help,
BACKGROUND
I am new to Premiere Pro and just started my first project on CC 2014. A tutorial recommended I select 'Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (OpenCL)' over 'Mercury Playback Engine Software Only' in the VIDEO AND RENDERING section of the PROJECT SETTINGS window. Since the former option isn't grayed out, I'm assuming I have both to choose from, however, when I select 'Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (OpenCL), only the audio will play back in my source window; the video no longer plays back.
HARDWARE
I am on an (early 2008) Mac Pro desktop with two 2.8 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon processors, and two ATI Radeon HD 5770 graphics cards.
I am running OS X 10.9.5.
QUESTIONS
1. Is there a way to figure out if I actually have this 'Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (OpenCL)' thing?
2. Is opting for 'Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (OpenCL)' over 'Mercury Playback Engine Software Only' (the default) really even going to make a noticeable difference in how my 1080p 24 fps movie is rendered?
Thanks in advance to any advice offered!
Shaun

I am not realy a mac person but Premiere can only use one graphics card. Can you disable one of the cards.
Might want to read this on how MPE works:
CUDA, Mercury Playback Engine, and Adobe Premiere Pro « Premiere Pro work area

How did I get better compression when using GPU acceleration?

Hello,
I was just making a short, 1:12-long video encoded as H.264 in an MP4 wrapper. I had edited the video in Premiere Pro CC, and was exporting through Adobe Media Encoder at a framerate of 29.97 FPS and a resolution of 1920x1080. I wanted to do a test to see how much GPU acceleration benefits me. So, I ran two different tests, one with and one without. The one with GPU acceleration finished in 2:09. The one without it took 2:40, definately enough to justify using GPU acceleration (my GPU is an NVidia GTX 660 Ti which I have overclocked). I am sure my benefits would be even greater in most videos I make, since this one had relatively few effects.
However, I checked the file sizes out of curiosity, and found that the one made with GPU acceleration was 175 MB in size, and the other was 176 MB. While the difference is pretty small, I am wondering why it exists at all. I checked the bitrates, and the one made with GPU acceleration is 19,824 KB/s, whereas the other is 19,966 KB/s. I used the exact same presets for both. I even re-encoded the videos again just to test it and verify the results, and the second test confirms what the first showed.
So, what I am wondering is: What is it that made this possible, and could this be used to my advantage in future productions?
In case it is in any way relevant, these are my computer's specifications:
-Hardware-
Case- MSI Interceptor Series Barricade
Mainboard- MSI Z77A-G45
Power Supply Unit- Corsair HX-750
Processor- Third-Generation Quad-Core Intel Core i7-3770K
Graphics Card- ASUS NVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti Overclocked Edition (with two-gigabytes of dedicated GDDR5 video memory and the core overclocked to 1115 MHz)
Random Access Memory- Eight gigabytes of dual-channel 1600-MHz DDR3 Corsair Dominator Platinum Memory
Audio Card- ASUS Xonar DSX
System Data Drive- 128-gigabyte Samsung 840 Pro Solid-State Drive
Storage Data Drive- One-terabyte, 7200 RPM Western Digital Caviar Black Hard Disk Drive
Cooling System- Two front-mounted 120mm case fans (intake), one top-mounted 120mm case fan (exhaust), and a Corsair Hydro H60 High-Performance Liquid CPU Cooler (Corsair SP120 rear exhaust fan)
-Peripherals-
Mouse- Cyborg R.A.T. 7
Keyboard- Logitech G110
Headset- Razer Tiamat Elite 7.1
Joystick- Saitek Cyborg Evo
-Software-
Operating System- Windows 8.1 64-bit
DirectX Variant- DirectX 11.1
Graphics Software- ASUS GPU Tweak
CPU Temperature/Usage Monitoring Software- Core Temp
Maintainance Software- Piriform CCleaner and IObit Smart Defragmenter
Compression Software- JZip
Encryption Software- AxCrypt
Game Clients- Steam, Origin, Games for Windows LIVE, and Gamestop
Recording Software- Fraps and Hypercam 2
Video Editing Software- Adobe Premiere Pro CC
Video Compositing/Visual Effects Software- Adobe After Effects CC
Video Encoding Software- Adobe Media Encoder
Audio Editing/Mixing Software- Adobe Audition CC
Image Editing/Compositing Software- Adobe Photoshop CC
Graphic Production/Drawing Software- Adobe Illustrator CC

As I said in my original post, I did test it again. I have also ran other tests, with other sequences, and they all confirm that the final file is smaller when GPU acceleration is used.
Yes, the difference is small but I'm wondering how there can even be a variable at all. If you put a video in and have it spit it out, then do that again, the videos should be the same size. It's a computer program, so the outputs are all based on variables. If the variables don't change, the output shouldn't either. For this reason, I cannot believe you when you say "I can, for example, run exactly the same export on the same sequence more than once, are rarely are they identical in export times or file size."

Error compiling movie: unknown error & Mercury Playback GPU acceleration

Hardware
2014 Mac Pro, 12GB RAM, 3.7 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xenon ES Processor, duel AMD FirePro D300 2048 MB graphics cards
Software
Mavericks (10.9.4)
Premiere Pro CC2014 (8.0.1)
I'm attempting to render out a moderately complex sequence. Raw footage was dslr h.264 MOV files. 30fps 1920x1080 from canon. It has some clips that are pulled from multi-cam sequences and a few that have warp stabilizer applied. 4 total audio tracks with some linked comps from audition. Whole thing is about 14 minutes. It should be noted that I render out similar sequences regularly without issue. However on this occasion whenever I tried to render out using media encoder ( for web h.264 MOV 720 30fps) I was getting an error at the same clip every time. Error Compiling Movie: Unknown Error. So I checked out the clip. It was one of the ones with warp stabilize. I turned that off and sent it out again. Render got further this time but hit a different clip with warp stabilize (after getting through like 2 other clips with warp stabilize enabled) and gave me the same error. I tried getting rid of cache files, saving to a local drive instead of a network drive, uninstalling and re-installing premiere even. (which btw if you check remove preferences then reinstall it def still has preferences so that's a total load.) Anyway I was doing some forum surfing and found several people going all the way back to PP 5.5 saying that the only solution they found was to turn off the Mercury Playback GPU acceleration. Tried that and it's currently rendering just fine but taking roughly 4X longer than with acceleration. The GPU acceleration is a big deal for me since our company relies on putting out a lot of volume quickly. Has anyone else experienced this problem and is it something you were able to fix without turning off GPU acceleration. Grateful for your input.

sorry I actually wrote that wrong. I am using the H.264 setting 720 30fps to create a web friendly .mp4. Alternately though I decided to watch and see if it was the same clip failing every time. It is. I went into the project and did a match frame for the offending clip. Dragged the a new version of the same content onto the timeline and copied the warp stabilize effect onto the new version. Well this time the encode got past the clip with the issue, however the next clip it hit with warp stabilize caused another error compiling movie: unknown error. I guess at this point my options are to turn off the GPU acceleration and wait for a render that takes more than 3x as long to render with software only, or to go through the whole timeline and replace the clips with warp stabilize (there are a bunch, the shooter wasn't having a great day on glidecam). Not a great solution on either end. Please let me know if I should file this as a bug report. Though it seems people have been having the same issues since version CS5.5

AME Adobe Media Encoder Cuda GPU Acceleration not activated, How do I activate it

Mac Pro Early 2009 4.1, Processor 2.93 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon, Memory 16 GB 1066 MHz DDR3 ECC, Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2048 MB, Software OS X 10.9.2 (13C64)
Adobe CS6 suite up to date all programs as of 3-18-14
NVidia Cuda Driver 5.5.47 installed, Open CL and GL capable
I read this article http://blogs.adobe.com/kevinmonahan/2013/09/13/enabling-cuda-for-the-mercury-playback-engi ne-in-the-macbook-pro-retina/. it shows GPU acceleration through AME (see below). In my AME que window I do not see this

Todd:
(edit)
Just reread - sorry, CS6 vs CC.
What about AME CC?
http://blogs.adobe.com/kevinmonahan/2013/09/13/enabling-cuda-for-the-m ercury-playback-engine-in-the-macbook-pro-retina/
So, CUDA acceleration in AME and OpenCL is supported. Anyway to monitor this? I get FAILED when I try either (on a box with nVidia, or a box with AMD).
Found this: http://helpx.adobe.com/media-encoder/using/whats-new-media-encoder-7-1.html#gpu-accelerati on
GPU acceleration
Adobe Media Encoder now takes advantage of GPU for rendering purposes. Both CUDA and OpenCL are supported. The latest release of AME uses the GPU for the following renders:
Scaling (HD to SD; SD to HD)
Timecode filter
Pixel format conversions
Deinterlacing
Aspect ratio changes
All effects in the Effects tab
GPU accelerated effects in Premiere Pro
If you are rendering a Premiere Pro sequence, Adobe Media Encoder will use the GPU render preference you have set for the project. All GPU rendering capabilities of Premiere Pro are utilized.The limited set of GPU renderable tasks in Adobe Media Encoder is only for renders that originate in Adobe Media Encoder.
If you are rendering a sequence with native sequence support, the GPU setting in AME is used and the project setting is ignored. In this case, all GPU rendering capabilities of Premiere Pro are utilized directly in AME.
If your project uses 3rd party VSTs (Virtual Studio plugins), the GPU setting in the project is used. The sequence is encoded through headless Premiere Pro just as in earlier versions of Adobe Media Encoder. If Enable Native Premiere Pro Sequence Import option is unchecked, headless Premiere Pro will always be used and the GPU setting is used.

WebGL Renderer & GPU Accelerated Windows Blocked for your Graphics because of unresolved driver issues

I am using Windows XP SP 2. My mother board is ASUS F1A55-MLX Plus, Processor: AMD A4-3400 APU with Radeon HD Graphics 2.70 GHz, 2GB DDR3 DIMM 1333 MHz RAM and 500 GB SATA HDD. I am using FF version 8. However, on some websites I cannot see the whole page on my 15" CRT Samsung color monitor. For the fact the slider at the bottom of the web page is not visible to move further left or right.
At '''Trouble Shooting Information''' the contents are detailed below:
Application Basics
Name
Firefox
Version
8.0
User Agent
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0
Profile Directory
Open Containing Folder
Enabled Plugins
about:plugins
Build Configuration
about:buildconfig
Crash Reports
about:crashes
Extensions
Name
Version
Enabled
ID
Modified Preferences
Name
Value
browser.places.smartBookmarksVersion
2
browser.startup.homepage_override.buildID
20111104165243
browser.startup.homepage_override.mstone
rv:8.0
browser.tabs.warnOnClose
false
extensions.lastAppVersion
8.0
gfx.blacklist.direct2d
3
gfx.blacklist.layers.direct3d10
3
gfx.blacklist.layers.direct3d10-1
3
gfx.blacklist.layers.direct3d9
3
gfx.blacklist.layers.opengl
3
gfx.blacklist.webgl.angle
3
gfx.blacklist.webgl.opengl
3
network.cookie.lifetimePolicy
2
network.cookie.prefsMigrated
true
places.database.lastMaintenance
1327382612
places.history.expiration.transient_current_max_pages
47671
privacy.donottrackheader.enabled
true
privacy.sanitize.migrateFx3Prefs
true
privacy.sanitize.sanitizeOnShutdown
true
Graphics
Adapter RAM
Unknown
Adapter Drivers
vga framebuf vga256 vga64k
Adapter RAM (GPU #2)
Unknown
Adapter Drivers (GPU #2)
Unknown
WebGL Renderer
Blocked for your graphics card because of unresolved driver issues.
GPU Accelerated Windows
0/1. Blocked for your graphics card because of unresolved driver issues.
'''Enabled Plugins'''
Shockwave Flash
File: NPSWF32.dll
Version: 11.1.102.55
Shockwave Flash 11.1 r102
MIME Type Description Suffixes
application/x-shockwave-flash Adobe Flash movie swf
application/futuresplash FutureSplash movie spl
Shockwave for Director
File: np32dsw.dll
Version: 11.6.3.633
Adobe Shockwave for Director Netscape plug-in, version 11.6.3.633
MIME Type Description Suffixes
application/x-director Shockwave Movie dir,dxr,dcr
Windows Media Player Plug-in Dynamic Link Library
File: npdsplay.dll
Version: 3.0.2.629
Npdsplay dll
MIME Type Description Suffixes
application/asx Media Files *
video/x-ms-asf-plugin Media Files *
application/x-mplayer2 Media Files *
video/x-ms-asf Media Files asf,asx,*
video/x-ms-wm Media Files wm,*
audio/x-ms-wma Media Files wma,*
audio/x-ms-wax Media Files wax,*
video/x-ms-wmv Media Files wmv,*
video/x-ms-wvx Media Files wvx,*
Microsoft® DRM
File: npdrmv2.dll
Version: 9.0.0.3250
DRM Netscape Network Object
MIME Type Description Suffixes
application/x-drm-v2 Network Interface Plugin nip
Microsoft® DRM
File: npwmsdrm.dll
Version: 9.0.0.3250
DRM Store Netscape Plugin
MIME Type Description Suffixes
application/x-drm Network Interface Plugin nip
'''about:buildconfig'''
Source
Built from http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/rev/d03b51a9b2bd
Build platform
target
i686-pc-mingw32
Build tools
Compiler Version Compiler flags
d;D:\mozilla-build\msys\mozilla-build\python25\python2.5.exe -O e;D:\mozilla-build\msys\builds\moz2_slave\rel-m-rel-w32-bld\build\build\cl.py cl 14.00.50727.762 -TC -nologo -W3 -Gy -Fdgenerated.pdb -we4553 -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -Zi -Zi -UDEBUG -DNDEBUG -GL -wd4624 -wd4952 -O1
d;D:\mozilla-build\msys\mozilla-build\python25\python2.5.exe -O e;D:\mozilla-build\msys\builds\moz2_slave\rel-m-rel-w32-bld\build\build\cl.py cl 14.00.50727.762 -TP -nologo -W3 -Gy -Fdgenerated.pdb -wd4800 -we4553 -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -Zi -Zi -UDEBUG -DNDEBUG -GL -wd4624 -wd4952 -O1
Configure arguments
--enable-application=browser --enable-update-channel=release --enable-update-packaging --enable-jemalloc --enable-tests --enable-official-branding

@mha007. I was able to update to version 10.0.1 via Help > About Firefox. Like John99 says it was updated a couple of days ago. However, the problem of WebGL and GPU still remains. I have asked my system supplier to check the same.
@zerofire. I have always built my computer and 'am a great fan of AMD. I hate Intel's blue Death Signs. We here in India do not like anything automated on our PC other than antivirus and antimalware along with pre-scheduled running of CCleaner and Defraggler. Once in a while I run CCleaner's Registry Cleaner. Even Windows Security Alerts are turned off. Windows XP and SP2 for PC and Windows 2000 for server are the most used. Not interested in SP3 or Vista as the transcription work I do requires me to just have XP or SP2. May later add on Windows 7 via dual booting.

No GPU Acceleration or MPE benefit (FX3800)

Yikes
Installed CS5 (Full Paid Version) yesterday. Shaking it down today.
Everything is working at light speed except.....
I do not get any GPU Acceleration or MPE benefit from the QUADRO FX3800 (or PPRO).
As soon as I apply any GPU accelerated effect (eg Ultra, Levels etc...) .
or Scale down a P in P - I get a RED RENDER BAR
This is a minimal sequence with Vid 1 :color bars, Vid 2: mxf 720p green screen scene, Vid 3: 720p mxf for PNP
Thought it was the Driver - updated to latest (NVIDIA 8.17.11.9759 - 16/4/2010)
Did not resolve it!
Flicked between Hardware and Software acceleration - no difference.
Any suggestions from the team ?
Intel Core I7 930 2.8 GHz - Socket 1366 (8MB L3 cache)
Asus P6T Deluxe V2 1366 DDR3 - Sata II Raid Express Gate SLI +CrossfireX 2xGB Lan 8 Channel Sound 2 x 1394a ATX Motherboard
Corsair1600 6GB Triple Channel Kit (6x2GB) 12GB
LEADTEK FX3800 NVIDIA QUADRO graphics card
Western Digital 300GB SATA2 Velociraptor HD (10,000rpm) - system drive
plus 3 x 1 TB HDDS - space for 5 more internals
24x DVD/CD BENQ
Antec P183 Advanced Black Super MidTower (3 x variable speed fans)
550 w PSU
BENQ M2700HD Widescreen LCD 27 inch Monitor / 2ms / 50,000:1 Contrast
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit OEM

I was the one who posted it because that is what our Nvidia rep said. He said the Quadro 3800 would have the same
3 layer limit as the 285GTX due to the 1GB ram on both cards. If that is incorrect then the information they gave me was incorrect.
BTW I will forward them this thread and ask them why they informed me otherwise. Thank you for the heads up.
Oh one last thing. Nvidia and Adobe stated the limiter was put in place because of the 1GB Frame buffer size limited performance in CS5 and they could only ensure performance with effect for 3 layers. If the Quadro FX 3800 is unlimited then that is completely false. Since the Quadro FX 3800 has a 260GPU in it and has 1/3 the ram bandwidth of a 285GTX then how does 1GB on the 285GTX require the limiter but the 1 GB Quadro card does not. This means Adobe is completely working with Nvidia to sell more Quadro FX cards and the limiter is a completely dishonest way to do it.
Note - After checking my email and speaking with my Adobe rep I changed the post. It was only our Nvidia rep that reported the limiter on both.

Does LR2 use GPU acceleration? Other system requirements?

Does LR2 use GPU acceleration as Photoshop CS4 does?
Do you think this machine will run LR2 for some time to come:
Dell Studio with Intel Q9400 quad core; 8GB RAM; 750GB hard disk.
Currently using integrated graphics, but there is a PCI x16 slot available.

>Does LR2 use GPU acceleration as Photoshop CS4 does?
No
>Do you think this machine will run LR2 for some time to come:
Yes that's more than beefy enough. To use that 8 gigs, make sure you run 64-bit windows vista on it.

Missing Renderer - GPU Acceleration Disabled

Hi.
I've been having a problem with premiere lately. When I create new project, the render settings are set for CUDA GPU acceleration. I have no issues while editing the project or when rendering preview files. However, once I save the project, quit premiere, and then later re-open the project, I am presented with the dialog "Missing Renderer" - "This project was last used with Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration, CUDA, which is either not available, or not certified on this system. Mercury Playback Engine Software Only will be used."
After this message, my timeline opens completely unrendered. I've attempted to change the project setting and reselect GPU Acceleration as the renderer, but the dropdown box is disabled in the project settings menu.
Can anyone help me with this issue?
Computer Specs:
Intel Core i7-3537U
8GB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce 710M with 1GB Dedicated RAM
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks.

Do you have dual graphics adapters?
Go to the Windows Control Panel and select Hardware and Sound and then select Device Manager... In Device manager you click the + sign to the left of Display Adapters... and see if 2 are listed
IF YES, read below
-http://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-pro/kb/error---preludevideo-play-modules.html
-http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1001579
-Use BIOS http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1019004?tstart=0
-link to why http://forums.adobe.com/message/4685328
-http://www.anandtech.com/show/4839/mobile-gpu-faceoff-amd-dynamic-switchable-graphics-vs-n vidia-optimus-technology/2
-HP Fingerprint/Password conflict http://forums.adobe.com/thread/911575
-Mac Utility for dual adapters http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1017891?tstart=0

Gpu acceleration problam

hi
first of all im sorry for my bad english
im workin with cs5 - this my system:
Intel Core i7-950 3.06 ~ 3.33 GHz x4 QUAD CORE 8MB Cache
nVIDIA GeForce GTS250 - support mercury with cuda
6GB
yesterday i tried to work with cs5 and i opened privious project and i got this :
the project was last used with mercury playback engine gpu acceleration wich is not available on this system .
mercury engine software only will be used.
i dont know why premiere suddenly stop recognized the gpu acceleration engine - when i go to video rendering and playback
settings the options are enabled and i cant change them.
does anyone seen this Notification or tell what went worng and how it can be fixed?
thank

Two question:
1. Did you just upgrade to 5.03?
2. Are you running a hacked or unlock card?
If you are running the unlocked or hacked card and you just upgraded to 5.03, then you need to unlock the card again, as the update wrote a new cuda_supported_cards.txt file and over wrote the one your video card entery.
Dave

Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration

I was an happy customer of Adobe CC till few days ago.
It were a few weeks I did not update the software in CC due to a problem with connection.
Needed to use Premiere Pro CC. It always crushes my MacBook Pro retina 2012 (16 giga ram) during export of the video. The monitor became black and there was no way to restart.
The Macbook worked smoothly with all the other softwares. Deleted CC and reinstalled everything, which was quit painful. However, at the end of the day, Premiere Pro CC works but I cannot use Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (open CL) which I used all the times before with huge advantage (exporting a 1 minute video in good quality needed 2 minutes with GPU accelerator, 20 minutes without).
When I open old projects of Premiere Pro cc I read this message "this project was last used with Mercury Playback Engine GPU acceleration (OPEN CL), which is either not available or not certified on this system. Mercury Playback Engine software only will be used". There is no way to change the rendered from Project setting - Mercury Playback Engine software is the only option.
My question: is it a problem with Adobe Premiere Pro CC or with my graphic? How to fix if is due to the software.
thanks

giacomonovara wrote:
--- GPU Computation Info ---
Did not find any devices that support GPU computation.
Any idea of the meaning?
It means your nVidia GPU isn't active. Either it's toast, or OS X has turned it off for some reason. My laptop is nearly identical to yours, and this is what my output is:
# /Applications/Adobe\ Premiere\ Pro\ CC/Adobe\ Premiere\ Pro\ CC.app/Contents/GPUSniffer.app/Contents/MacOS/GPUSniffer
--- OpenGL Info ---
Vendor: Intel Inc.
Renderer: Intel HD Graphics 4000 OpenGL Engine
OpenGL Version: 2.1 INTEL-8.26.34
GLSL Version: 1.20
Monitors: 1
Monitor 0 properties -
   Size: (0, 0, 2880, 1800)
   Max texture size: 16384
   Supports non-power of two: 1
   Shaders 444: 1
   Shaders 422: 1
   Shaders 420: 1
--- GPU Computation Info ---
Found 1 devices supporting GPU computation.
OpenCL Device 0 -
   Name: GeForce GT 650M
   Vendor: NVIDIA (Apple platform)
   Capability: 1.2
   Driver: 1.2
   Total Video Memory: 1024MB
See the difference? The nVidia GPU is listed.

Trouble with GPU Acceleration in Premiere Pro CS6 (GTX 670)

I recently bought a new GTX 670 with the hopes that it would accelerate my video editing in Premiere. After using the "nVidia hack" to add it to the list of CUDA supported cards, I started up Premiere, enabled GPU acceleration in the general project preferences window, and was disappointed to find that my performance appeared to be identical to what I had experienced with my non compatible HD 6870s.
When I checked with MSI Afterburner, my GPU usage remained around 0%, even when playing through videos. I'm quite certain that my card was successfully added to the list, so I have no idea what's going on.
Is there any chance that I am misunderstanding what GPU acceleration is supposed to do? I'm very new to Premiere, so I don't know too much about it yet. The reason I bought my new card, aside from improved performance in 3D games, was to allow me to scrub through my project (comprised of 1080p AVI videos captured with FRAPS) without hiccups and poor FPS. Was this not a reasonable expectation for GPU rendering?
Here's a short list of my PC's specs if it's any help:
-Intel i5 2500k (currently not overclocked)
-8GB DDR3 Dual Channel RAM (at 1600MHz)
-1TB 7200RPM HDD
-nVidia GTX 670 OC 2GB VRAM
-Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3 Motherboard
Thanks in advance for any advice!

Did you go to project>project settings>general and verify that GPU (cuda) accleration is enabled? If it's set to software only then change it and see if that helps. If it's enabled my next question is what is the bitrate of your FRAPS videos? Because I have seen some fraps video's with bit-rates that are really high which would require a RAID array that is only holding video clips to playback smoothly. In your case it appears you have your OS and your apps and your footage all playing from the same 7200rpm drive. Which isn't really sufficent for 1080p editing. However it might be as simple as enabling it from within premiere pro like I mention earlier. If it's enabled though please check the bit-rate of your video you're attempting to edit with because I'm assuming that might be the issue.

Intel Haswell GPU acceleration in CC?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for