Inter-pbx sig' bandwidth over the WAN

need to interconnect two similar pbx's across a wan.Using PRI. i vaguely recall reading the signalling channel (CCS) needs to be uncompressed. Is this configured or default. Any examples ?

See this doc for what (I think) you are looking for:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1834/products_feature_guide09186a00800e9761.html#wp1019465
Aaron

Similar Messages

REMOTE RECORDINGS OVER THE WAN IN CCX 7

We have a customer
with CCX 7 local agents and recording services ( BUT NO QUALITY MONITORING)
Normally records all local agents calls ( colocated with CCX.
Now customer has remote agents via WAN and needs to record their conversations.
According specifications and PDI case the sutiationis:
"This deployment model can support silent monitoring and recording for agents at any WAN-connected site by using desktop monitoring. (Refer the Cisco Unified CCX Software and Hardware Compatibility Guide for a list of phones that support desktop monitoring). It can also support SPAN port monitoring for agents on the VLAN segment local to Cisco Unified CCX server. This deployment model does not incorporate additional remote Monitoring components, so silent monitoring and recording is not possible for agents who are using the Cisco IP Phone Agent at remote sites. Similarly, silent monitoring and recording is not possible for agents at remote sites who are using phones that do not support desktop monitoring."
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_7_0/design/guide/uccx70srnd.pdf
page 4-6
The list of phones not supported for desktop monitoring is listed in the compatibility guide.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_compatibility/matrix/crscomtx.pdf
In other words CCX can support "silent monitoring and recording for agents at any WAN-connected site by using desktop monitoring"
But assume you use an IP Phone that supports desktop monitoring
AS RECORDING OPTION WITHOUT QUALITY MONITORING NEEDS MAC ADRESS OF AGENT how can CCX record agent calls taking into accoutn that MAC address is lost when traversing the WAN ...
So the question for this dsicussion is :
IS QUALITY MONITORING THE ONLY WAY TO RECORD REMOTE AGENTS OVER THE WAN OR ARE TEHRE OTHER OPTIONS WITHOUT IT??
Pease reply to [email protected]

It is possible without QM. When using desktop monitoring, the phone is configured to Span to PC port. The agent must be running CAD and the PC running it must be attached to the PC port on the phone. CAD sees the spanned packets from the phone and then forwards them to the recording service on the CCX server. The big gotcha is that the NIC in the PC must not discard 802.1q-tagged packets. If the NIC discards them instead of forwarding them into the NDIS stack, CAD will never see them. Sometimes this takes a Google search and a registry setting change to fix if it doesn't work at first.

DNS: Client can't connect because .local domain isn't in DNS. How can I connect over the WAN to server.domain.local?

So my 2012 server is set up on the LAN with a .local domain name.
Remote Desktop Services are set up and remoteapp stuff works fine on the LAN.
I've set up port forwarding so I can connect to the server over the WAN too, but remoteapp stuff is a bit different. I can connect to the server by specifying the correct IP address. Giving a Web browser the address
https://serverIPAddress/RDWeb
lets me get the login screen and see the range of apps for me to run. I select one, the connectoid is downloaded correctly (in Chrome) and I click on the downloaded connectoid.
Unfortunately, rather than pursuing the sensible IP-address approach that I started with, the connectoid has been given the server's name on the LAN: server.domain.local. Clearly, the client machine tries to look this up but DNS hasn't heard of
it because it's a .local address.
I cannot be the only one to have come across this apparent oversight on Microsoft's part. Any ideas as to how this can sensibly be overcome? Obviously, I could put the IP address translation into every client's hosts file (and I've done this and shown it
works) but I've got too many clients to mess about like this. Anybody know 'the Microsoft way' to fix this?
Thank you for checking this out -- I am confident the details of the problem are completely specified in this query but, if I'm wrong, please ask.
Many thanks again,
Biffo

Hi,
I would like to suggest you to follow the checklist.
Checklist: Make RemoteApp Programs Available from the Internet
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772415.aspx
Thanks.
Jeremy Wu
TechNet Community Support

Management traffic load over the WAN

Management process(include monitoring and security) with the central WCS system will cause Management traffic over the WAN links.
Can you tell me more about the traffic load over the WAN links if we will use it as only as Wifi detection and prevention system(inclue location and not for wireless services..for now).
We will use 150 air-AP1000(lwapp)on AIR-MONITOR mode over the WAN and 4400 controllers one in each remote sites(10 sites).

I think the following documents might provide you with some good information.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6305/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008059c98b.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6305/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008059ca16.html

Multi-Master Replication over the WAN

DS verison: 5.1 sp1
Did any one implement multi-master replication across the WAN or different IP subnets?

Sun does mention about DS 5.2 being better than DS 5.1 in WAN based Muli-Master replication with respect to replication performance. I wanted to see if any one out there had implemented (or even played with this topology in their labs) it with out any major hickups.
Thank you!

Deploying a large client partition over the WAN.

Hi there,
I have a straight forward question on deployments. Here is the scenario:
I have a large number of machines (around 200) onto which I have to
deploy our client partition. The catch is this:
a) these machines (NT4.0 Workstations) are on a WAN, (64K line)
b) the client partition is huge (about 12MB),
c) and we would like to do regular upgrades to the system.
I looked at Applets and it is not going to buy us anything. What would
have helped is if Forte could compress the distribution files before
sending them across the WAN. As far as I know, this is not a feature of
Forte (we are using 3.0.G.2). I guess there must be something that I'm
overlooking.
Is there anyone out there willing to share his knowledge on this subject
with us?
Regards.
Jaco Fouche
==============================================
Jaco Fouché - MD Systems (PTY) Ltd
LOCAL INTERNATIONAL
Tel: 011 454 3760 +27 11 454 3760
Fax: 011 454 3780 +27 11 454 3780
Cell: 082 451 3242 +27 82 451 3242
Internet: [email protected]
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Hi there,
I have a straight forward question on deployments. Here is the scenario:
I have a large number of machines (around 200) onto which I have to
deploy our client partition. The catch is this:
a) these machines (NT4.0 Workstations) are on a WAN, (64K line)
b) the client partition is huge (about 12MB),
c) and we would like to do regular upgrades to the system.
I looked at Applets and it is not going to buy us anything. What would
have helped is if Forte could compress the distribution files before
sending them across the WAN. As far as I know, this is not a feature of
Forte (we are using 3.0.G.2). I guess there must be something that I'm
overlooking.
Is there anyone out there willing to share his knowledge on this subject
with us?
Regards.
Jaco Fouche
==============================================
Jaco Fouché - MD Systems (PTY) Ltd
LOCAL INTERNATIONAL
Tel: 011 454 3760 +27 11 454 3760
Fax: 011 454 3780 +27 11 454 3780
Cell: 082 451 3242 +27 82 451 3242
Internet: [email protected]
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

The whole configure over WAN thing is confusing me I don't want anyone to be able to access my airport extreme over the WAN. How can I check to make sure that is the way I have it setup?

I just bought a new airport extreme and I want to make sure that is NOT set up for "configure over WAN". How do I check to make sure that is how I have it set up? I only want access to the base via WPA2 password

Open AirPort Utility, select the AirPort Extreme, and click Manual Setup
Click the Base Station tab located just below the row of icons
Remove any check mark that might be in the box next to Allow Setup over WAN
Click Update to save your settings and the AirPort Extreme will restart in 25-30 seconds
For what it is worth, if you leave the box checked, any computer that tries to access the settings on the Airport Extreme will be asked for the device password....not the wireless network password.

Distributed deployment migration to Clustering over the WAN

Hello All,
The existing deployment is distributed with different CM versions running on each of them i.e 6.1.3(2 Clusters), 7.1.5(1 Cluster) and 8.6(1Cluster). It has been requested to get these clusters migrated to version 10.x in either centralized or CoW deployment. However, some of the clusters have around 1700 and 2600 phones in the cluster and because of SRST gateway sizing limitation, we have to approach CoW deployment. We have CUCM, UCxn(new dep) and MediaSense(new dep) applications. There are currently around 8000 users registered to the CM but considering future expansion, it must be proposed for about 20K users. My questions are :
1) With UCSS in place, how does the Migration work for different versions? I am not aware of the existing used and unused DLU's in 6.1.3 version and methinks it has to be taken into account to convert into type of Users for UCL.
2) Without UCSS in place, how tricky does the migration become?
2) There are 8 sites, with 5 sites having at least 2000 users. Considering future expansion for 20K users, how do we position the number of subscribers in each site for CoW deployment? I understand there are BHCA and bandwidth calculations involved, 1PuB, 1 SuB, 1 TFTP/MOH servr in DC, 1 SUB each in other sites and an additional TFTP server in one of the sites?
Appreciate the help!
Q

Q,
The first place to start is to look at the cucm 10.X SRND. Look in detail at capacity planning and call processing.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/collab10/collab10/callpros.html
Each cucm 10.X node can support a total of 10,000 users/devices using the 10,000 OVA template. The cluster can support a total of 40,000 users/devices. I am sure this will meet your present and future needs.
Next you need to look at sizing. The cisco virtualization wiki details what to do in this case..
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_in_a_Virtualized_Environment#How_to_Design
Download the sizing tool from here
http://tools.cisco.com/cucst/faces/landing.jsp
Then use the placement tool to determine how you should place your VMs..
You may want to send your final output to Cisco to verify your design. Virtualization is not so straight forward as bare metal server deployments, so you need to design carefully.
From what you have said, looking at about 20,000 users I would suggest the following
1. 4 cucm subscribers--each deployed with 5,000 users/devices. This setup will allow for one to one backup
2. 2 dedicated tftp/moh servers
3. 1 publisher
That gives you a total of 7 virtual machines. This means that you will need two UCS servers-C series servers
Although the sizing tool suggested 12 VMs with six subscribers.. (this means that you will need three UCS servers-C series)
For SRST, depending on how critical the phone system is you either do the ff
1. Use the voice gateway at the site to support SRST. This obviously is limited to the capacity of the voice gateway at the site
2. Re-use the existing cucm servers and deploy them at the local site just for SRST. This will ensure you can support the whole site in SRST
It is advisable to place your UCS servers in your DC. If you have a single DC, then you place one there and then the other at another site (Hq)

What is the best reporting tool to use over a WAN

I am currently working on improving the performance of our Oracle FMIS over a WAN that covers most of Australia.
I was wondering if anyone could point me to tech information on the impact of Oracle Reporting tools on a WAN.
The three tools we use are ADI, Discoverer and strait Oracle Reports.
I am not an expert in Oracle so even basic info on the effect of the 3 products would be of help, of course if anyone is willing to share their experiences it would be appreciated.
We have two major user sites of 500 people seperated by 3000km and 5 minor sites 2000 from head office. I unfortunalty am at the major office 3000km from the server with 500 dissatisfited users.

Hi Cab211,
Thanks for visiting Apple Support Communities.
You may want to use these links as starting points in your search for a camera:
iMovie ’11 Supported Cameras
http://help.apple.com/imovie/cameras/en/index.html
Final Cut Pro X Supported Cameras
http://help.apple.com/finalcutpro/cameras/en/index.html
Cheers,
Jeremy

3750 bandwidth limitation between the same vlan over the trunk

Hi All,
I have 2 3750G series switches on the trunk link. some machines are part of vlan1 on the switch 1 and some machines are the part of the same vlan1 on the other switch2. I need to limit the bandwidth between the switches for the vlan1. picture is attached.
I tried to do through the modulare policy frame work (class-map/service-map and policy-map using the police command) but problems are
1) 3750 does not support output service policy, so i cannot apply the policy on the output of the trunk link.
2) I can apply the input policy but it will be only for one machine but not for the others on the same switch. if i apply the policy on per port basis then every port has separate bw limitation. I require to limit the bandwidth on per vlan basis on the trunk port. like vlan 1 takes 10 MB, VLAN2 takes 10 MB on the trunk link when communicating between the same vlans.
Is there any solution for that scenario? your help in this case will be higly appriciated. As its the layer 2 communication, its hard for me to find the solution. if it was layer 3 then i can do it easily by using the rate-limit commmand on the interface.
thanks

On the 4500 series we use vlan-range for this,
conf t
qos aggregate-policer 10MB 10 mbps 1250000 byte conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
policy-map 10MB
class class-default
police aggregate 10MB
interface GigabitEthernet1/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,10,12,15
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
vlan-range 1
service-policy input 10MB
service-policy output 10MB
end
dunno if the 3750's have the same options

How can i use ONE server 2012 to be DC for a domain on the WAN only.. NO LAN. and NO VPN..

I need to run an active directory that is on a WAN (Utah). a server 2012 standard will be the DC with 60Mbps internet speed both up and downstream.
approximately 100 clients/member systems will be all over the united states. NO VPN. only via internet. I can use SSL certificate for secure ldap.
I need this setup to use GPO for different permissions and policies instead of manually doing those on each windows 7 or 8 professional system.
Ideas??

Daniel,
I think since this will be the ONLY system that will be running as a DC providing ADDS and the Direct access server, i should follow this advice from the article you sent:
For users who never connect directly to the Contoso intranet or through a VPN, they must use the DirectAccess
Offline Domain Join process to initially join the appropriate domain and configure DirectAccess. When this process
is complete, the users log on normally and have the same experience as if they were directly connected to the Contoso intranet.
Because remember, no user will ever connect directly to the subnet where the server is. so do an offline join First and then start managing.. Only thing im worried about is: they keep saying that the direct access function has significantly improved in windows
8. hmmmmm many systems will be using windows 7 Pro 64Bit. Some windows 8.1 Pro 64bit. should i worry?

How do I access my time capsule over the internet

How do I access my time capsule over the internet. I've already set it up to share over WAN, but I have ATT so my TC is connected to the router provided by ATT can I still access my TC via the internet even though its not directly connected to the Ethernet?

The TC should be in bridge mode.. not setup to share over wan.. that will never work. That is assuming you haven't bridged the ATT router.
Once you bridge the TC see if you can setup BTMM using icloud settings in the TC. As per the Apple docos.. here.
You should also be able to directly access the TC since you have a router with dyndns client at a guess.. the setup is simply forward port 548 to the TC.
Google search this.. there is huge number of resources available. eg
http://useranswer.com/answer/how-can-i-access-my-time-capsule-remotely-with-iclo ud/

How do I access a had disk from the WAN?

I note that I can adjust my settings to allow myself or others to connect to the hard drive attached to Airport Extreme. In the advance>file sharing menu of Airport Utility have checked the boxesto share disks over Ethernet WAN port, as well as to advertise globally using bonjour, with access controlled by accounts.
Now say I'm at schoool or work and I want access to a file on that drive. How do I connect to it?
Also, what of the settings for "Windows File Sharing"?
I've trying to find the answer in the manuals and articles, but no luck...
Anyone know?

Hi worriedwoman,
You'll only be able to verify the hard drive when you're booted off the drive. The repair functionality is only available when you're running off the installation disc. When you purchased your computer it came with two discs (an installation disc and an applications disc).
Insert that installation disc, restart the computer and hold "C" immediately after pressing the power button. Continue to hold the "C" key until the Apple logo appears with the spinning gear, you can then release the key. Once the welcome screen appears, choose your language and wait for the menu to appear at the top of the screen. Choose Utilities > Disk Utilities and you'll be presented with the familiar screen.
The reason you see the two HDs is because of how Mac OS X categorizes your HD. The first one is the drive itself, indented below that (Macintosh HD) is the startup volume or mount point. If you had multiple partitions you'd have multiple entries. You'll want to select the Macintosh HD when performing your disk verification/repair operations.
_*You do not want to delete anything*_
The CD drive works the same way, the top one (MATSHITA CD-RW) is the drive and the indented entry is the drive's contents. No need to verify/repair either of those.
This URL is helpful for identifying keyboard shortcut icons - http://www.danrodney.com/mac/

Can not view video over the Internet on WVC80N

I set up the web cam, set up the port forward etc so now I am able to:
   1. view/change web cam settings inside my home network.
   2. view video inside my home network.
   3. view/change web cam settings over the Internet.
But I am not able to view video over Internet. Every time I did so (using IE browser), after clicking the view video button, I got an error : There are too many user connections or the device is busy, please try again latter.
Anyone has a fix on this? I set up port forwarding on port 1024 (that's how I can chage settings over Internet).
I spent 2 hours on the phone with Linksys tech support but they could not find the reason.
Thanks,
Sam

Who is your ISP? How you are trying to access your Camera from the remote location? Along with Port 1024 you need to do port forwarding for port 80 on your router for the Cameras IP address. As WVC80N works on your HTTP Port.
To access your camera from the Remote location, you need to use http://wan ip:80.

Access Time Capsule over the internet

Hey guys! I have a problem. I cannot access my Time Capsule over the internet.
I have a Time Capsule 2013 which connects to the internet using a PPPoE connection and which provides wireless connection to other peripherals in my house.
The TC is running the latest firmware and I've added my iCloud account in AirPort Utility settings, in order to access the TC over the internet, via Back to My Mac.
Whenever I'm away from home, I cannot access the TC.
I see it in Finder's sidebar, but whenever I press the "Connect As.." button I get the following error:
"There was a problem connecting to the server “Time Capsule”.
The server may not exist or it is unavailable at this time. Check the server name or IP address, check your network connection, and then try again."
I must add that I have a dynamic IP. Whenever the Time Capsule restarts, it gets a different IP.
Am I missing something?
Please help me. It's really important for me to be able to reach it when I'm away from home.

So the modem is bridged and the TC is doing the PPPoE authentication.. and it gets a public IP on the WAN interface.
The dynamic nature of the IP is not a problem with the BTMM and iCloud type system which should keep the intermediate connection in the cloud up to date.
What about the connection at the other side.. are you getting a public IP.. are you behind a firewall or restricted access? Remember both sides of this have to work.
See this thread.. you are not alone.. all is not sweetness and light unless you get a proper business account with static IP.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3699096?start=0&tstart=0
Apple info has a bit about issues that people experience.. and Tesserax has some setup info.
Remote Access
I would use the public IP and see if it works.. that means you need to check the IP before you leave home or use your phone tether and do the test at home so you can type in the public ip and use direct access .. at least to test it.

Inter-pbx sig' bandwidth over the WAN

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for