Interco cross company consignment

Hi Gurus,
i have some question pertaining Interco IV for ConsgnIssue (KE), for example :
Material number D-13230 assign to Sales Org A1
and also have 2 plant = plant A1 & plant B1.
1. issue S.O Fillup (KB) SOLD-TO cUSTOMER# A1234 (customer sales org A1)
W/ MATERIAL D-13230 from Delivery plant B1. Continue with D.O and GI.
2. iSSUE S.O Issue (KE) sold-to customer# A1234 (customer sales org A1)
W/ MATERIAL D-13230 from Delivery plant B1. continue with D.O and GI.
issue F2 to customer A1234 and issue IV to .
My question :
is it possible during GI for KB in step no.1 , material will fillup
customer consgmt Hub in plant A1 instead of plant B1 ?
so i can D.O and GI for step no.2 using delivery plant A1 (issue GI from plant A1).
Thanks.

hallo ????

Similar Messages

  • Cross Company Consignment Processing

    Hello,
    We are trying to implement a Cross Company Consignment Sales Scenario. In this scenario the sales org of company x is selling goods on consignment to sales org of company y.
    Is there any Standard SAP way to implement this?
    If not how will the goods receipt in Company Y happen. Will a purchase order be created (since this is a consignment scenario)?
    Any answers?
    Thanks,
    Sid

    Hi,
    Just check with this regular process once. Shoudl give a clue or two as to how you can go about.
    <a href="http://sap-img.com/sap-sd/consignment-sales-process-in-sap.htm">consignment process</a>
    Sadhu Kishore

  • Cross-Company consignment to customer

    I'm an MM guy but this has landed on my plate.
    Requirement:
    Sales Org A (Company Code A, Plant A not-HUM managed) is the customer facing one.  They receive the consignment request.
    The stock is held at Plant B (Plant B is HUM managed, 'owned' by Company Code B, Sales Org. B)
    Currently:
    SO1 create on SOrg A
    SOrg A create STO to get ownership of stock on Plant B (this is manual, no link to SO1)
    The stock is actually shipped direct to end customer and Bill generated (covers VAT/Intrastat reporting etc.)
    Std subsequent process on notification by customer of consumption.
    The issue is that the customers PO reference and material numbers (from SO1 and CMIR of SOrg A) are not shown on the Delivery paperwork (out of Plant B).  Customer requires these, plus packing info. i.e. HU info.
    Seeing as SD has all the bells and whistles compared to MM, is there a better way this can be handled in SD ?  Crucial factors in a solution are:
    1.  Getting the both the HU and customer reference data on the Delivery/Packing Note (ex Plant B)
    2.  The stock ending up as consigment stock owned by Plant A
    3.  Linked to 2. a sale of stock from company B to Company A  i.e. transfer of ownership, with Billing, for reporting purposes.
    Strong answers and not speculative ones please i.e. things that you know will work or get very close to a complete solution.
    Currently I have a complex BADI in mind for the Delivery processing but I'd like to avoid that if possible.  Thanks in advance for taking the time . . .

    Hi Bea,
    Please check that intercomapy billing type is assigned to sales document type, in below path.
    IMG > S&D> billing --> Define order type for Intercompany billing
    Check in delivery header , processing tab "IntcoBill" field, it shows that transaction is relavant for intercompany billing.
    Hope this will help you.
    Kaushal.

  • Creating Cross Company Code Vendors/Customers.

    Hi All,
    I'm trying to understand how to create cross company code Vendors and Customers.  I've already established the link with configuring OBYA.  What I'm not clear is on which company code I should be creating the vendor and customer. 
    We have two company codes, 2100 & 0980.  CC 2100 has the central bank tha pays invoices for CC 0980.  I have two issues.
    1. What kind of configuration is needed to accept incoming payments into CC 2100 House banks and lockboxes?
    2. For intercompany activity between 2100 & 0980 how are the vendor and customer master records set up?  I know there needs to be a vendor on the customer master and a customer on the vendor master.
    So for 0980 acting like a vendor for 2100 I'm assuming the vendor number for 0980 is set up as a 2100 vendor.
    The same is true when acting as a customer.  The difference being is that this vendor entered into a field on the customer master and the customer number is entered on a field in the vendor master. 
    I'm missing how the Vendor record, if created on Company Code 2100 gets linked to Company Code 0980.

    For SAP to 'know' that a particular vendor / customer master records represents a specific company code, all these needs to be linked to the same 'company'.
    Companies are maintained in T880 (IMG : enterprise structure -> definition -> Fin Acctg -> Define Company
    Company code is linked to a company in the cocode config. IMG enterprise structure -> Assignment -> Fin Acctg -> Assign comp. code to company
    And finally, the Trading Partner field in the Customer/vendor master is where you assign the company to the cust/vendor.
    This setup will eventually allow you to consolidate interco A/R, A/P, etc.. if you need to but is not necessary for the interco process to post.(although you'd want to have it rght from the get go)

  • FBU8 Reverse Cross Company Issue

    Hello,
    I have a unique situation that I can't figure out.  One of our A/R clerks posted two cross company code transactions.  The situation is this.
    InterCo #######1
    Co 8500 Doc #####899
    Co 8520 Doc #####402
    InterCo #######2
    Co 8500 Doc #####891
    Co 8520 Doc #####400
    She reversed all subsequent postings so she could reverse these two intercompany documents.
    Reversed Intercompany ######1 with message #####899 reversed but ######402 not reversed.
    Reversed Intercompany ######2 with message #####891 reversed but ######400 not reversed.
    Now, #######400 will not reverse because it has a cleared document that was cleared by ########402
    #######402 will not reverse with the error that document has cleared items but there are no cleared items other then the cross company doc with should be cleared with the cross company reversal.
    Please help.
    Thanks
    Rick

    Hi,
    Please check if the period in which you are trying to reverse the document is the one that has been closed.
    Also check if the document was posted in other modules like SD, MM You may also check if checks have been assigned to these documents,
    if yes then you must reverse them first and make them void
    the check using FCH9 and then try reversing it.
    Check if you have changed any field status group of any account assignment involved in documents during the time document was created and the time you tried to reverse.
    Regards

  • Cross company payment through F-53, error in Check deposit & check issue tr

    Hi
    I have just joined the community and ready with 3 queries.
    Please.......... help me to resolve.
    i) While executing the cross company payment ( company code 1300 making payment for vendor in company code 0013) using transaction code F-53, I am getting error 'vendor not defined in company code 1300'.
    For F-53 screen, vendor is selected from company code 0013.
    I have executed APP (F110) successfully in company code 1300 for paying the same vendor in company code 0013.
    ii) For check deposit transaction, error is " entry 1300 is missing in table TO43S'. (1300 is a company code)
    iii) For check issue transaction, error is "no batch input data for screen SAPMF05A'
    Thanks
    Rekha

    1. Don't give vendor number in the main screen, give all remaining inouts and press enter, then it'll show the second screen
    there you can give the company code and vendor account.
    2.  Cretae a tolerance group for GL accounts in OBA0.
    Don't post more than one query in the same thread.
    Rgds
    Murali. N

  • Payment term is not being pickedup in cross company code transaction

    Dear Friends,
    In one of the cross company code transaction scenarios (MIRO), We post a invoice in HQ books to bill on outside vendor. In subsidiary books one more cross company code document will get generated automatically, as billing on HQ as a vendor. In that second document, payment term is not being pickedup.
    eg., A is HQ and B is subsidiary company
    I post invoice in A books as B account debit and outside vendor credit.
    In B books one more entry will get generated automatically as GRIR account debit and A (defined as vendor in B books) account credit.
    In B Books payment terms are maintained in vendor master record (A vendor).
    But still the payment terms are not being pickedup in that document. Because of this, it is taking the document date itself as net due date.
    Please suggest, how to proceed to pick some payment term in that document.
    Regards
    Suresh

    Hi
    Assign the payment terms in Purchase Organisation level in Vendor Master Record.
    Regards
    Shammi

  • Stock report for cross-company sales

    Dear all,
    We are using for our Saudi Arabia company the cross-company sales process with sourcing unit in another country.
    There is a Legal requirement in Saudi to provide a Stock report (with "stock in", "stock out" quantities and values).
    But with the cross-company sales process the stock movements are not visible in Saudi.
    Any advice ? Is there a report in SAP for this legal reqirement in Saudi Arabia ?
    Best regards

    Hi,
    Try to use t-code MB51, will give you a list with the relevant movement types!
    Good luck
    Tao

  • Missing CO Sales Order Item in 643 Cross Company Movement

    Hi all,
    we are working in a make-to-order scenario in which the company A/plant A sells a finished product produced by company B/plant B.
    The sales order item is a cost object (account assignment category E – “Ind. cust. w. KD-CO” is set in the requirement class in use) and is derived into the Transfer Order (Account Assignment tab) from production company B/plant B to selling company A/plant A.
    When we try to transfer the finished product from plant B to plant A by means of 643 movement the system provides error message  KI 235 – Account xxx requires an assignment to a CO object where xxx is the Cost Of Goods Sold for company B. This is due to the fact that FI is not able to derive the sales order item as a posting cost object.
    We have activated cross company  CO objects by deactivating the Company Code Validation indicator (field TKA00-RKBUK) for controlling area settings.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks in advance.
    PierGiorgio

    Hi Abhi,
    yes it is: "E" is the entry value in the field consumption of the requirement class involved.
    Thanks, PierGiorgio

  • Questions on Inter-company and Cross-company sales ordering process..

    Hi,
    I understood the delivery plant and the sales org. is not in the same company code might be the process, but i want to know some details especially in SAP system how it is realized and processed, hope could kindly help me on below questions!! thanks!!
    1)what is the difference between inter-company sales and Cross-company sales??
    2)What is the general document flow and config. when in below 2 cases:
    Suppose the 2 company code under same sap client system, then what kinds of company code,plant config within the system for inter-compan and cross-company, and finally what kind of document flow will it be in the system.
    Suppose the 2 company code is under diff sap system, then what kind of doc flow in each sap system for inter-company and cross-company sales process???
    Thank you very much!!!!

    Hi,
    Basically there are totally Three types of scenarios
    1. Intra Compnay Stock Transport Order
    In this type of scenario, the stock is transfered between Two Plants which are under the same Compnay Code. The document type used here is UB. Here in this scenario the owner ship on the stock is not changed thats way there will not be any Invoice. The process as follows
    a. Create Purchase Order with document type UB - ME21N
    b. Create Replenishment Delivery with Document type NL - VL10B
    c. Picking and PGI - VL02N
    Now stock will be shown in Transit, you can check this using T.Code MB5T.
    d. Do MIGO to receive the stock into ordering plant.
    2. Inter Compnay Stock Transport Order
    This is called as Cross Compnay STO. Here the stock is sent from one plant to another plant which are in two different Compnay codes. That means the Ownership on the stock is changed in this scenario, that way there will be Intercompnay Invoice IV is reaised. Here the stock is just moved to one plant to another plant but not to any customer.
    The Process is as follows
    a. Create a PO using type NB - ME21N
    b. Create a Cross Compnay Replenishment delivery using type NLCC - VL10B
    c. Picking and PGI in VL02N
    d. Inter Compnay Invoice IV is raised by Supplying Compnay code to the Ordering Compnay Code - VF01
        for this a customer created in Supplying Compnay who represents the Ordering Compnay and the invoice is raised against to that customer.
    e. MIGO to receive the stock in Ordering Plant
    f. MIRO to do invoice verification and do Vendor account update. This also can be done by EDI triggering, to update the Vendor Account. That means with this step, ordering compnay will update into its vendor account that he has to give certain amount to the compnay who supplied the stock.
    3. Inter Compnay Customer Sales
    This is similer to the 2 process, but here instead of sending to Plant we will send the stock directly to Customer of other compnay code.
    The process is as follows
    a. Customer raises  normal sales order in another compnay code of type OR - VA01
    b. But if the plant of that compnay does not have stock, then in the order the plant is changed to other compnay code plant.
    c. Delivery is created in supplying Compnay against this Order - VL01
    d. Picking and PGI is done - VL02N
    e. But the stock is sent direclty to customer from supplying plant.
    f. Ordering compnay will raise normal invoice F2 to the customer
    g. Supplying Compnay will raise Intercompnay invoice IV to the Ordering Compnay.
    But for all these process there are some configurations can be done, like
    the material should be extended to both the plants
    a customer is created in supplying plant who represents the ordering plant so that IV can be generated to that customer.
    Supplying Plants should be linked to ordering Sales Org and Distribution channel. etc.
    Hope this is clear.
    Thanks
    Praveen

  • Problem in GRN while Capturing Excise Invoice in Cross Company STO Scenario

    Dear All,
    In the Cross Company STO Scenario we are following the steps as below:-
    1.) Creation of the purchase order to the supplying plant of type u201CNBu201D
    2.) Creation of the Outbound delivery in VL10B
    3.) Post Good Issue in the VL02N.
    4.) Creation of the billing doc.
    5.) Creation of the Excise Invoice.
    6.) MIGO w.r.t to the Outbound delivery in the receiving plant
    During MIGO ,initialy system is picking the excise rates and excise base value by its own from the purchase order and the moment  when we refer the Excise Excise Invoice created in the supplying plant , system takes the Excise rates from the excise invoice created in the supplying plant and Excise Base value is becoming ZERO and we are getting the error :u201D *Please check excise base for the item is ZERO
    Message no : 4F121
    Please Suggest what to do and why this error is coming.
    When I am giving any other Excise no is the Excise Invoice feild in MIGO , it is taking and refering the rates in PO and giving one information message that Excise invoice no is different from the supplying plant excise invoice no.
    Thanks & Regards
    Nitin

    HI,
    Check the excise base vlaue in the Supplying plant excise invoice. If its 0, maintain the assessible value in J1ID & Check.
    If everything is found OK,  check if any SAP notes are available.
    Thanks & Regards,

  • Cross Company Stock Transfer- Please check excise base for the item is zero

    Hi,
    My scenario is Cross company Stock transfer (Two different Company Codes)
    I have done following steps :
    1.Create Purchase Order
    2.Create Outbound Delivery for Purchase Order
    3.Post Goods Issue for Delivery
    4.Creating Billing Document
    5.Creating Excise Invoice
    6.Printing of Excise Invoice
    7.Post Goods Receipt for Stock Transport Order
    Till MIGO there is no problem.
    I am getting a errro while doing MIGO with reference to Outbound Delivery, when I enter Excise Invoice created in sending plant, I am getting error as
    "Please check excise base for the item is zero" - Message no. 4F121
    Excise Duty values are flowing as per the excise invoice but system make base value as 0 , I have maintained Assesable value in J1ID also. We are using TAXINN.
    Pl. help
    Thanks
    Vikas

    Hi
    The best way to slolve this problem, Now is to maintain Assable value in Material Master For reciving Plant.
    Hear you can maintain all the chapter id, register A or C, etc
    and then try doing GR,
    The other way and the permanent solution is
    VPRS or equivalent
    Condition class B Prices
    Calculat.type C Quantity
    Condit.category  H
    Cond.control H Condition value fixed
    Condit.origin A Automatic pricing
    In this Condition category is most important and by this only system copies the base amount for excise duty calculation in MIGO or J1IEX.
    Regs
    Niti Narayan

  • Trading Parner Not Inherited to Cross Company Balance Sheet Line item

    Hi,
    I posted cross company document using document type that is already untick in field 'inter-company posting' and 'enter tpid'.
    My accounting entries is as per below:
       Co1000   Cr Balance Sheet   $250
       Co1001   Dr Expense            $10
       Co1001   Dr Expense            $240
    Upon posting, TPID only populated in the cross-company code clearing line item only. Not to all of the GL line item.
    However;
    1) If using the same set of data (cross company posting) whereby the Balance Sheet line is replaced with P&L account, the posted document will inherit TPID to all line item.
    2) If posting in single company's book, using related party customer account with the same balance sheet as per example above, TPID is inherited to the BS line item. example is as per below:
         Co1000  Dr Customer1001   $300
         Co1000  Cr balance Sheet    $300
    Is there any reason or notes that can be implemented so that for cross company transaction that contains BS account, TPID is being populated in all line item?
    TQ.

    Hi,
    If the Trading Partner is maintained in OX16 and you are still getting this problem then, please refer to OSS Note No.:779844 and 438076.
    Regards,
    Kiron Kumar T.

  • Posting using cross company code transaction must be blocked

    Hello Guys,
    I have a  problem related to cross company code transaction.
    In the OBA7 I have the document type KE that not allows posting using cross company code transactions. In the moment that I am creating a new document through the FB01, I have an error as "Consolidated companies US52 and ' ' are different
    Message no. F5080. As a results, the document cannot be created by this way. This is the correct process.
    But I have several documents that was used the doc type KE and the cross company code transaction was used. This is my issue. I don´t know why these documents were posted. The document come from another interface via IDOC and the IDOC not errored out.
    Can anyone help on this?
    Thanks
    Rafael B.

    Hello, I´ve checked the log and no changes since 2008.
    The document was created in 2010.
    This is the message: "No logs found for the selected period"
    More suggestions?
    Regards.
    Rafael

  • Posting of cross company transaction with different doc types

    Hi,
    The scenario is:-
    We have two companies X and Y.
    X makes a payment to Y with the following FI entries:-
    Company Code X
    Dr Vendor Y
    Cr Bank HDFC
    Company Code Y
    Dr Bank ICICI
    Cr Customer X
    Now this needs to be a cross company transaction where the doc type for CC X should be vendor Payment 'KZ' while the doc type for CC Y should be a customer reciept with doc type 'DZ'.
    Although I am able to map the accounts in cross company code config I am not able to split the transaction of different company codes with different document types.
    Is there any way we can do this in standard SAP?
    Thanks in advance,
    Nitish

    Hi
    As per your issue ...There are no possibilities to post   in sap with different document types.
    If you want you can post cross company code transactions with one document types
    Regards
    vamsi

Maybe you are looking for

  • Need to delete unsorted bookmarks folder

    FF3 brought us the "unsorted bookmarks" and associated star in the bar fail. I got rid of the start using userchrome.css file. I need to DELETE the "unsorted bookmarks" folder permanently and forever. If this cannot be done it should be added to FF4

  • Edit from Lightroom 4 to Elements 10

    I recently purchased Lightroom 4 and tried to edit in Elements 10.  I got the same error message that has become popular on many forums.  Has Adobe come up with a fix for this yet?  If not, what is the timeframe for the fix?  I purchased Lightroom 4

  • How to maintain different unit of measure in the system

    Hi, I am using  a flat file source system in which i am using a 0MATERIAL,0QUANTITY. Now i need to load conversion factors into 0MAT_UNIT. how to do this for flat files? I have to do this to fill master data by right clicking on 0mat_unit and doing m

  • Custom components and the navigator object

    Hi all, I'm starting on a mobile project which is a ViewNavigator based application. I've created a custom component which contains a button. I'd like the button to be able to use the pushView method however as it's a custom component, it doesn't app

  • Using Camcorder as Mic via FireWire

    I am shooting a video podcast and I want to use an extra camcorder (that has a decent mic) to record the audio. This enables me to place the mic closer to those speaking. Currently I am capturing live with iMovie, then detaching the audio from the ca