Intercompany Elimination is doubling after running Legal consolidation

Hi BPC Guru's
Intercompany Elimination is doubling after running Legal consolidation Data Manager Package 2nd time tripples when run 3rd time and so on..Only change is that for resolving an issue with balance carry forward, we had changed the datasource type property for the audit trail members that store the eliminated amounts ealier this was A (Automatic) we changed that to (Manual) M and this is causing the doubling to start because if i change it back to A then there is no doubling..but the eliminated values are incorrect.
Would be great somebody provides with their expertise.

Hi Arnold,
This issue is related to another issue that was discussed on the http://scn.sap.com/thread/3247090
Till December all was well. Come January, after I run the consolidation package, the rule takes into account the balance from December for each month’s calculation:
There were 2 suggestions from the above post that i tried:
Check if “COPYOPENING” property in the Audit Trail dimension should not be “Y” -> It was Y for me but changing it to “N” did not solve my issue.
Opening Flow should be assigned “FLOW_TYPE” property with the value of “OPENING”
Both these are done in my system. But still the above issue exists. I also tried to change the rule to “Periodic” type but did not help.
  What I basically want is for BPC to ignore the values from previous year and run the calculation based on only the current month’s data.
When we first faced this issue during January closing, as a temporary fix, we changed the “DATASOURCE_TYPE” property of the audit members used in Eliminations from A to M. This made the rule not consider December balances in the calculation.
But doing this gave rise to the doubling issue.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Shruti

Similar Messages

  • Error in running Legal COnsolidation Package

    Hi All,
    On running the legal consolidation package i am constantly getting the same error which is :
    'RUNLOGIC:Dimension Set: "ENTITYDATAVALUE" not assigned in Data manager'
    I have checked all the dimensions and it all seems to be proper. I tried altering the input of data manager to include ENTITY dimension but the manager did not run at all.
    Please help me out. if anyone encountered the same error and has countered it pls share how to do so..
    Regards
    Navin

    Hi,
    I think you are using %ENTITY_SET% in your script. However, you are not prompting for the entity member in the DM package. You need to add the entity dimension in the prompt statement of the advanced script of the DM packge.
    Hope this helps.

  • Error while running legal consolidation package RUNCONSOL

    Hi All
    I have below error while i run the consolidation package can anyone throw light on the same
    Start time --->5:17:46 PM  -  Date:1/6/2009  (build code:254)
    User:BPCDEV\bpcadmin
    Appset:FTIL
    App:LEGALAPP
    Logic mode:1
    Logic by:
    Scope by:
    Data File:
    Debug File:D:\BPC\Data\WebFolders\FTIL\LEGALAPP
    ..\AdminApp\LEGALAPP\LegalConsolidation.txt
    Logic File:D:\BPC\Data\WebFolders\FTIL\LEGALAPP
    ..\AdminApp\LEGALAPP\LegalConsolidation.lgx
    Selection:D:\BPC\Data\WebFolders\FTIL\LEGALAPP\PrivatePublications\bpcadmin\TempFiles\FROM_81_.TMP
    Run mode:1
    Query size:0
    Delim:,
    Query type:0
    Simulation:0
    Calc diff.:0
    Formula script:
    Max Members:
    Test mode:0
    Is Modelling:1
    Number of logic calls:1
    Call no. 1, logic:D:\BPC\Data\WebFolders\FTIL\LEGALAPP
    ..\AdminApp\LEGALAPP\LegalConsolidation.lgx
    Building sub-query 1
    Query Type:0
    Max members:
    Executing SPRUNCONSO [LEGALAPP], [ACTUAL], [C_FTILG], [SPSCOPE_200127],[SPLOG_282986]
    SPRunConso Version 2.06
    ERROR CSD-015 No instruction retreived from the ELIM Table with FLOW Dimension
    Time to run stored procedure:1.6 sec.
    call 1 completed and data posted in 1.6 sec.
    Run completed in 1.8 sec.
    End time --->5:17:48 PM  -  Date:1/6/2009
    SPRunConso Version 2.06
    ERROR CSD-015 No instruction retreived from the ELIM Table with FLOW Dimension
    Thanks and Regards
    Harish B K

    Hi this was due to not maintaining proper design and it was solved later once we setup all the parameters perfectly
    and had time dimension members for one year prior (though seems strange)

  • After upgrade BPC from 7.0 to 7.5 NW we facing issue in Legal consolidation

    Hi
    After upgrade BPC from 7.0 to 7.5 NW we facing issue in Legal consolidation where in case of equity knock off the amount is not get balanced even after we run legal consolidation package in group currency.
    Regards
    Vikash

    Hi sandeep ,
    Hence the problem was not there with previous versions where the .js files were simply not compressed by default.
    Solution :
    I believe switching off javascript compression is a suitable option in this case as the script files are usually cached by the browser as well and will not be transmitted every time.
    Kindly follow these steps:
    1. Enter the J2EE Config tool.
    2. drill down: Global Server Configuration->services->http
    3. on the right hand side, click on NeverCompressed
    4. on the bottom, add at the end: ,*.js
    5. Apply the changes
    6. restart the J2EE.
    After this clear the browser cache and then log onto the portal and check if the issue gets resolve
    I hope it will useful to you.
    Thanks@ Re grads
    G.srinu

  • Intercompany elimination at legal entity and profit centre level

    All,
    I have a question regarding intercompany elimination. As far as I understand, BPC can only hold one Interco dimension per application. If you want to perform an intercompany elimination for two dimensions which do not roll up into each other, two separate applications are needed. Please see example below to clarify:
    Data is reported the following way:
    Legal entity   Profit Centre   Account    Interco    Value
    The problem is that the profit centre hierarchy does not roll up into the legal entity hierarchy mainly because there are profit centres set up as legal entities. Consequently, the legal entity hierarchy and the profit centre hierarchy are two independent hierarchies.
    The business requirement is to have an intercompany elimination at profit centre and legal entity level at the same time (hence requiring two Intercos at the same time). This is needed as some of the profit centres are set up as legal entities.
    Can someone advise me as to how to resolve this issue? Did anyone come across a similar problem?
    Please let me know if you require any further clarifications.
    Marc

    Hi
    Try to use 2 application for the interco elimination
    for the 1st appls ur entity will be the entity dimension and use intco as intco dimension
    for the 2nd one use the profit center as entity and build a new intco
    As per interco logic this is using the Intco property in the Entity dimension and Entity property in intco dimension
    it is very impossible to do this in one application
    Thanks
    CSD

  • IC elimination for legal consolidation

    I am wokring on legal consolidation and am working on legalapp application.
    I notice that the input schedule template for IC elimination refers to dimension members of application finance. Similarly the Logic file (ICElim.lgx in the server refers to dimension and members of finance application.
    Are we expected to adapt tthe templates and logic files or are we supposed to perform IC elimination in Finance application and then transfer values to Legalapp application.
    How to trigger conolidation process and calculation of minority interest.
    Regards
    Srikaran

    You don't have to copy data from finance to legalapp for the intercompany eliminations.
    You enter Intercompany data directly in the legalapp application for the intersections of IC accounts and intco counterparts.
    Matching is normally done by creating logic that posts the entered ic data directly to the counterpart entity. From this you can create matching reports.
    IC elimination and EQ elimination are being generated by the combination of the stored procedures 'sprunconversion' and 'sprunconso'. The legalapp application has examples for both of them.
    I have never adopted the templates provided by apshell.
    Hope this helps,
    Alwin

  • Double postings after running transaction FAGLF101

    Hi All,
    After running transaction FAGLF101 some postings double (only in Ledger 0L, YQ seems to work)
    While running this transaction, we have to do it twice, with two different valuation areas.
    This resulted in double postings for few Adjustment accounts (for example adjustment account foreign payables, adjustment account domestic receivables, etc).
    I have checked the Ledgers 0L and YQ. Document splitting is not active.
    Can any one suggest me how to analyze further and solve this issue.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Deepthi.

    Hi All,
    Can anyone provide any suggestions to analyze this issue please.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Deepthi.

  • US Elims - Legal Consolidation issue

    Hi,
    We are currently running US eliminations and we want to do legal consolidation. After consolidation all the records are apprearing in the Consolidation scopes defined in the scope dimensions other than my US_Elim transaction which appear in No Scope "S_NONE". I have defined US_ELIM as a member of Audit Trail dimension with Data type = 'A'.
    My initial data is loaded from BW in scope S_NONE. To see my consolidated financial statements, I am having an issue bringing both S_NONE (for US Elims)  and S_* for my consolidated results as this will double up my results.
    Can you please help me out with this?
    Sincerely,
    Nicky

    Please help!!!
    Sincerely,
    Nicky

  • BPC 7.5 NW - Legal Consolidation

    Hi
    I have a question regarding the consolidation procedure in BPC. We have both Groups and RptCurrency Dimension in the Consolidation Application. Following are the steps we are doing for Consolidation:
    1. Load Data
    2. Currency Conversion (to NON_GROUP)
    3. Check Trail Balance, Balance Sheet & Income Statement (In NON_GROUP but reporting currency)
    4. Check Intercompany Data (InterCompnay Matching & Difference Posting using ICDATA & ICBOOKING) in Same Consolidation Application (In NON_GROUP but reporting currency)
    5. Run Consolidation (Includes Transfer data for entities to respective Groups, Intercompany elimination and COI Adjustments & Eliminations)
    Now my question is that If I have all adjustments for Steps 3 & 4 to match Balance Sheet, Match Intercompany data etc. in NON_Group but in Reporting Currency. How to transfer the same to respective Groups form NON_Group? Just before Running Consolidation. I don't wish to do currency conversion again as it has already been performed in step 2.
    Regards
    Jigar
    Edited by: jigarv on Feb 1, 2012 4:53 AM

    Jigar,
    Have u solve this? I'm facing a similar issue, trying to do currency conversion to Group currency.... when i execute the package for conversion, a message "NON_GROUP doesn't exist"... can u help?
    Thx

  • Legal Consolidation Questions

    Any suggestions/comments on this will be appreciated.
    1) What is the required structure of the ConsolView (Group/Currency) dimension? The logic results in an error "No Group Available." I put in place all property values described in the BPC Guides. The sprunconversion piece for example will run successfully if restricted to "USD". It fails when the Groups are included. What could i be missing.
    2) What data should be loaded to the Ownership Application?
    I have a POWN account - to load percentage ownership by entity
    I have a Method account - to load Consolidation method by entity
    Do I need an "Active Account"? What is this? Does anyone have a sample input template i can look at?
    3) Is it possible to have the eliminations occur in designated Elimination Entities - similar to Intercompany eliminations where eliminations are performed in the elimination entity below the first common parent.
    thanks,
    Agnes

    Hi Justyna,
    the datasrc on which you enter/load your data has to be type I, so the intial setting was correct. Once you change it to type A the system expects that it needs to calculate the values and that there should be no LC values, so whatever you entered gets deleted.
    As to why the package did not post anything, I can only guess. One potential problem is the ownership information, the system will only created posting if the ownership information is correctly maintained.
    Regards

  • Default Logic for Intercompany Elimination (USELIM)

    Dear Friends,
    I am doing the Intercompany elimination for Management consolidation. I have configured the Entity and Intco and also maintained the "ELIMACC"  property in the account dimension. Also i have manintaied the ICELIM.LGF where the following code is been maintained
    *RUN_PROGRAM US_ELIM
    CATEGORY = %C_CATEGORY_SET%
    TID_RA = %TIME_SET%
    OTHER = ENTITY=%ENTITY_SET%
    *ENDRUN_PROGRAM
    do i need to maintain any thing else in the default logic of my application. I have not maintained any Business rules, is it mandatory to maintain the same?. Please suggest me. ( I have no currency convertion since input and reporting is in USD only.)
    I tried running the "IC Elimination" package with the sofar done setting am getting the Package  status as 'Cancelled'
    Thanks
    Prem

    Group dimension is mandatory to add.

  • Legal Consolidation problem

    Hi Experts ,
    Couple of days before , we restored the appset in the our development server .
    After we did the procees all the dimensions and optimization all the application .
    When i runned the legal consoldation , its running but no effect in the database .
    This our legal consolidatio  packaga file  :
    PROMPT(RADIOBUTTON,%CHEKCLCK%,"Select whether to check work status settings when running logic.",1,{"Yes, check for work status settings before running logic","No, do not check work status settings"},{"1","0"})
    PROMPT(SELECTINPUT,,,"Please select category, entity and time for restatement",%CATEGORY_DIM%%TIME_DIM%%CURRENCY_DIM%)
    TASK(Execute formulas,USER,%USER%)
    TASK(Execute formulas,APPSET,%APPSET%)
    TASK(Execute formulas,APP,%APP%)
    TASK(Execute formulas,SELECTION,%SELECTIONFILE%)
    TASK(Execute formulas,LOGICFILE,%APPPATH%\..\AdminApp\%APP%\LegalConsolidation.lgx)
    TASK(Execute formulas,RUNMODE,1)
    TASK(Execute formulas,LOGICMODE,1)
    TASK(Execute formulas,CHECKLCK,%CHEKCLCK%)
    I have one question here , we have the LGF file in the script login , but in the in package file it call in LGX.
    R we need do anything ...
    Regards
    Daya

    We done the both things .
    I done the validated and save , then ran the legal consolidation , the package runned suceessfuly .
    The data is not chnaged..
    Is there any way to track the issue.....
    In my view status , it showed  as
    TOTAL STEPS  1
    1. Default Formulas:        completed  in 0 sec.
    [Selection]
    CHEKCLCK= Yes
    (Member Selection)
    Category: ACTUAL
    Time: 2011.DEC
    Groups: C_OLAM
    Regards
    Dayalan M

  • Legal consolidation reset values

    Hi All
    My legal consolidation package behaves strangely.
    I input my data for consolidation on COM_RAW datascr which has is_CONSOL to Y and DATASCR_TYPE to I.
    In my businnes rules I used COM_RAW as source datascr and ELIM1 as destination datasrc which has  DATASCR_TYPE  A.
    After run my package no entries are generated (0submitted......)
    But when I changed COM_RAW DATASCR_TYPE to A  all values on COW_RAW have been reset- set to 0. On ELIM1 which has DATASCR_TYPE set to A nothing was generated.
    Do you know why this happen?
    Regards
    Justyna

    Hi Justyna,
    the datasrc on which you enter/load your data has to be type I, so the intial setting was correct. Once you change it to type A the system expects that it needs to calculate the values and that there should be no LC values, so whatever you entered gets deleted.
    As to why the package did not post anything, I can only guess. One potential problem is the ownership information, the system will only created posting if the ownership information is correctly maintained.
    Regards

  • Just my own curiosity on Legal Consolidation

    Hi Everyone,
    Iu2019m curious and hope to see some good feedback here.
    How many people actually know and have experience performing legal consolidation with BPC.
    Anyone in America?
    Anyone with BPC 7, Microsoft or Netweaver?
    Thanks for your feedback, I'm sure many other are curious about this.
    Fletch

    At the outset, let me say that we did not have to do Intercompany profit elimination on this project.  But my BPC mentor had a few suggestions.
    The scenario is company A produces 100 units of Product X for $100 ($1 per Product X - Cost of Sales) and sells it to Company B for $200 with mark up price ($2 per Product X u2013 Sales). Now Company A has sales of $200 while Company B has COS of $200 which will be easily eliminated by intercompany elimination. But now Company B has $200 worth of Inventory (Assets) when it should be actually only $100 thus inflating the assets. Is there a business rule to eliminate inventory/asset of this kind?
    If certain assumptions can be made, you could eliminate the 'imbalance' of COS and sales to the inventory account.
    Also now if Company B sells 80 units of Product X, 50 of which are from the ones supplied by Company A while the remaining 30 are bought from somewhere else. So now company B is left with 50 units of Product X (that was bought from Company A) valued at $100 (when its actually $50). How do we evaluate inventory in this case (remember there might be hundreds of such transactions happening in the company, multiple products being bought from multiple inter-companies at different prices)? How do we eliminate the Inventory profit because of stock transfer? How do we track all these stock movements?
    In cases such as the above, I would rely heavily on using movement types to track stock transfers.  You then have the option of using formulas.  An alternative would be to (a) store the profitablilty of the products in the system,  (b) pull down the requisite movement types into an excel template within BPC, (c) let excel calculate the appropriate profit to be eliminated (d) send these profit figures to the system to actually perform the elimination.
    The above are just different ways of thinking about/tackling the issue.  You would have to test it out!
    All the best
    Tara

  • Intercompany eliminations

    Hi,
    i would like to know for inter-company eliminations we have Business rules and script logic , can we achieve the elimination process with either one of the process or do we need both.
    Also what is the difference between US eliminations and auto eliminations.
    Thnx
    PP

    Hello,
    You could achieve the eliminations with either one or the other.
    In bot cases you will need a logic file. If running the business rules you will need a logic file to trigger the program. If using script you will store in the logic file itself.
    Using the business rules is more efficient (uses ABAP program) and understandable/maintainable for the end user.
    For the diffenrence between us elliminations and auto eliminations see following user guide:
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/7070134c-1b04-2d10-f29d-bbb35abfa119
    It explains how to set up full legal consolidation in BPC.
    Hope this helps,
    Best Regards,
    Eric

Maybe you are looking for