Interconnect Data Transfer to SLOW

Hi,
We are working with database adapters for Oracle.
In our Production enviroment we have 2 adapters one for each application.
But when Application adapter one sends the message to hub is very slow and when the message pass from hub to application adapter 2 is slow to.
What should I do to tune my adapters and the hub repository?? because we have a high volumen of transacctions.
Regards

Ricardo,
That IS a very SLOW transfer!!
A few more questions.
What hardware are you running?
What operating system / version are you running?
What version of Oracle Integration are you running?
Is this compatiable / certified against your server and o/s?
What other processes are running at the time? My question is suggesting that there are competing processes using up CPU. Is your Hub dedicated only for Interconnect processes, or is there any other OLTP occurring?
Are your adapters caching the metadata at runtime?
Other suggestions are me "clutching at straws" like, checking auto-extents on Hub tablespaces, or do you need to de-fragment your hard-disk?
My experience in slow interconnect performance has always been on the source or target systems, not the interconnect. The fact that you are in Production, and therefore heavy OLTP on your Production source or target databases means that maybe your adapters are working only as quickly as your source or target systems can publish and or subscribe.
Do you have a JMS memory leak? This is difficult to track down, but have a look on Metalink.
I am confounded by this too!
My only real suggestion is to contact Oracle Support ASAP.
Regards
Yan

Similar Messages

Data transfer very slow on mac pro!! mac H/W unable to fit specifications.

Hi,
I am installinginternal disks on the quad mac pro and the transfer ratet in the mac are very slow!!!
the disks are: barracuda 7200.10 disks, 500 GB. Sta II 300, max ST3500630AS firmware 3.AAE . throughput:300mb.jumpred off to get the 300.
MAC tells that the QUAD MAC Pro equipment (2x2.66ghz dualcore intel xeon) comes with a 3.Gigabit specification/ 300MB/sec. (Intel ESB2 AHCI, speed: 3.0 Gigabit. AHCI version 1.10 supported)...
And the benchmarks of the disk ST3500630AS show maximum 80MB/sec and a minimin of 37.3MB/sec, average 63.1 MB/sec. (anandtech tests).
According to seagate.com the maximum sustained data transfer rate:78MB/s
but in the mac the reallity is different: I am getting a transfer rate of 22MB/sec!!!!! . with out any application running and only making copy of the files!!!!
that means that the mac is only providing only 1/3 of the expected transfer rate for the disks..
so, is there a way that the MAC Pro gets all the normal transfer rate for those disks???
Is the Quad MAC Pro hardware unable to get the maximum throughput of the disks???
It seems that the mac is unable to get also the average transfer rate of those disks.. how to correct it???
thanks a lot
Alberto
ps. just for fun: I am getting a faster transfer rate from an old power pc ,and old pc, and firewire 400 and old ide disks!!! (36MB/seg!!!)

Yup.
BThe latest Mac Pro are better, so if you have a new or 2 month old unit, Seagate should work, though I think there should be later firmware.
Some would say those drives take the cake or woRSe.
http://www.barefeats.com/hard91.html
SEAGATE PUZZLES
+Firmware version 3.AEE or later solves the slow sustained large block write speed issue for a single 7200.10 inside the Mac Pro.+
+The remaining performance issue is slow small random read speeds for one, two, three or four drives. No matter how many drives you configure in RAID 0 sets, the average random read speed for combined block sizes from 64K to 1024K is less than 30MB/s (based on QuickBench 3 testing).+
+Until Seagate fixes this, we can't recommend the 7200.10 series as the ideal boot drive for the Mac Pro (or Power Mac).+
http://www.barefeats.com/quad08.html

Data Transfer Workbench Slow on Large Imports

I am using version 6.5.11 of the workbench, API version 6.50.53
I have a problem with the speed of imports where the file sizes become large. e.g. I am importing sales invoices using a header file and line items file. Both are tab-delimited text files. If I import 2000 invoices, it takes around 1.8 seconds per invoice. If I import 10000 invoices, it takes around 18 seconds per invoice (50 hours). I actually wanted to import around 30000 invoices, but that was taking a minute per invoice.
Another problem is that the first data line after the header line in every import file is ignored and not processed.
Does anyone know if these have been fixed or will be fixed soon?

To import a large amount of items or invoices with the Data Transfer Workbench, I always shrink the file into x files with 1000 records. That's the only to have a fast process.
Apparently this problem is correctedwith 2004 which is much faster. I haven't tested yet the DTW with 2004 as I just received it.
For the bug you have with the line, it occured to me one time too but not anymore and I can't work out why it did that. Maybe, it could be more efficient for you to create message on the marketplace.
Vincent

Data transfer extremely slow

My wifi network seems to be very slow in transferring data - Airplay on ATV or file exchange between macs is extremely slow. Playing Airplay video from iOS to ATV is worse than watching Youtube. My internal network appears slower than my internet connection.
Any suggestion on what I should check or reset? Thanks
It is a provider's Huawei modem and an Airport Extreme router, distance few meters. I will not wire devices:)

Please also note that using a "speed test service" like speedtest.net or other is a measurement of your WAN link, ie from your router's WAN interface to the specified test location. This is not a measurement of throughput to your "client device". These results would be the same between your wireless client connected at a poor 1Mbps speed and your 1Gbps wired desktop. Do not use these types of services as a measurement of throughput of your internal infrastructure.
Keep in mind file transfers in windows (like copy and paste to a file share) utilizes Microsoft's SMB/SMB2 protocol which is very chatty and very inneficient. This is not a good throughput test. Utilizing a pure TCP transfer method, like FTP, would give more realistic results. Even better would be to utilize an application like iPerf to perform pure tcp/udp throughput testing.
Also, Microsoft tends to display transfers in terms of MegaBytes, rather than MegaBits. Your 100Mbps (megabit) internet would provide a potential throughput of 12.5 MegaBytes. The same as on your LAN. When you're copying a file to a share and it's going at 2megaBytes per second, this is actually 16 megabits per second. So, your client connected at 54Mbps, half-duplex, realizing a throughput of probably around 20-25mbps is actually doing pretty good to get 2-3 megabytes of transfer speed using SMB file transfers.
Unless you have true tcp throughput tests prior to changes and after changes, the data you have provided thus far is not indicative of poor performance.

Slow data transfer between servers across ACE

Hello all,
We have been facing slowness in SFTP file transfer. All three tiers are in different Vlan on ACE module.
App Server1 to DB Servers (Data Transfer is slow 32KB)
App Server2 to DB Server (Data Transfer is OK)
DB Servers to Web Servers (Data Transfer is OK)
TestPC to App Server1 (Data Transfer is slow 32KB)
TestPC to App Server2 (Data Transfer is OK)
I have requested the customer on results of some other test cases, but before i start on ace, just checking if someone has faced similar problem.
Regards,
Akhtar

See this thread.
http://community.bt.com/t5/Other-BB-Queries/HomeHub-3-LAN-speeds-only-10Mb/m-p/238589/highlight/true...
There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

575 LRE and data transfer problems

575 LRE and data transfer problems
Hello,
I have a connection from my provider using the Cisco 575 LRE, configured for 10 Mbit/s. I don't know the make and model of the switch but I assume it is likely a Cisco device also.
I'm experiencing problems with the LRE connection whenever big files are being transfered simultaneously in both down- and upstream directions to/from a PC. The data transfer may slow down to a stall and all WAN connectivity may become momentarily blocked. Transfer speeds and reliability always seem good as long as big files don't get transferred in both directions at the same time.
What could cause this problem? My service provider says that they see no problems in their end and they are unable to help me. I don't know how extensively they have looked into any possibility of problems though.
I've tried different 100Mbit network cards, replacing ethernet and phone cabling and changing duplex settings and MTU, but nothing has completely solved the problem so far. Forcing network cards to full-duplex does prevent the worst slowdown and hanging described above, but limits upload speed to around half of the maximum available.
Not sure if this is meaningful here, but my service provider claims they have the switch my CPE is connected to configured for full-duplex, but when I have a PC network card set to autonegotiation, it will always result in a 100baseTX half-duplex link with the 575 - this is the case where I get maximum speed in either one direction but also the mentioned problems with bi-directional transfer.
I don't know what more I can do to the PCs here to solve this problem and I don't have access to configuring the CPE device, because I don't own the switch it is connected to. I can only think of trying to ask my ISP to read this thread if someone has a possible solution that requires actions on their behalf.
Any help would be much appreciated.

The problem, as you describe it, is most likely cabling ...it could be the cable between your PC(s) and the 575 (most likely), or between the 575 and the switch.
What you are seeing are the effects of crosstalk (signal from one pair interfereing with the other pair), that's why you see it in full-duplex mode and not (so much) in half-duplex (with half-duplex, only one side talks at a time).
The only part you would be likely be able to change would be the connections on your side of the 575 ... so, try another cable; preferably a store-bought cable and in good shape (twisted, crushed, kinked, stretched, and poorly constructed cables are a Very Bad Thing).
LRE was designed to handle voice-grade cabling, but if you're at near the extreme length, you may see some degradation.
Good Luck
Scott

Very slow network directory listing - but fast data transfer speed once listed?

Hello,
I have really tried to sort this myself before opening up to the community, however I have run out of ideas, and hope someone can offer the magic solution I have missed.
I am currently using the 3.4ghz i7 iMac on a 1GB LAN, running OSX10.7.2 - connecting to a Windows Server 2008 (Running Release 2) over ethernet.
If i go to a network directory that i haven't recently accessed it can take up to 60 seconds to show the contents of that directory. Once i have accessed that folder, if i come out of it and go back in it will be instant again - but the first time it lists the directory it looks like i have opened an empty folder - which after anything from 10seconds to 1 minute will suddenly show the files that are there.
Internet connectivity is fast through the network, and file transfers across the LAN are fast. (showing as approx 300mb per second) I can play and edit HD content across the network with no slowdown so I am confident that this issue is not related to the network speed itself, and is more to do with a setting on this mac.
Symptoms are very similar to this post: https://discussions.apple.com/message/12245148?messageID=12245148&amp%3b#1224514 8 - however i understand that in OSX Lion - SMB was removed - so i cannot find this file to edit.
I have tried bypassing additional hubs in the network by wiring direct cables to the switch that is connected to the file server, this made no difference.
I have also tried disconnecting the ethernet cable, and running over wifi. This fixes the listing problem, but when editing HD content over a network drive, this connection is not fast enough to carry the data without interruption (some projects are linked to up to 900gb of hd video content!)
Using ethernet, I have tried DHCP, DHCP with manual address, and manual mode. All reproduce this problem. i have tried using the windows workgroup, and tried without it.
I have also followed this suggestion: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2134936?threadID=2134936&tstart=45 and used OpenDNS. this did not fix the issue.
For argument sake, I have also just tested a Macbook Pro running Snow Leopard to see if it was OS related. This reproduces the exact same problem, near instant directory listing on the wifi, a long and arduous wait on ethernet.
I cannot work out why directory listing is instant over wifi, but not over ethernet on 2 different macs, running 2 different versions of OSX. I also do not understand why if the network is having trouble listing the directories - the data transfer speed is 300mbps when i copy files across the wired network from the file server to the mac.
Does anyone have any other ideas as to what could be the problem here? We are about to start work on a very large project, where the content we are editing is spread out across around 200 different network folders (different shoots captured over the past 2 years). We really don't have the time to wait 60 seconds each time we need to access one of those directories to look for a file, and I am very close to pulling all my hair out!
I really look forward to hearing from anyone who can offer any insight.

If you are suspecting that the Windows update had something to do with your LAN going slow, then try the following:
1. Look for updates for your clients LAN NIC driver; or
2. Un-install the updates.

Significant slowness in data transfer from source DB to target DB

Hi DB Wizards,
     My customer is noticing significant slowness in Data copy from the Source DB to the Target DB. The copy process itself is using PL/SQL code along with cursors. The process is to copy across about 7M records from the source DB to the target DB as part of a complicated Data Migration process (this will be a onetime Go-Live process). I have also attached the AWR reports generated during the Data Migration process. Are there any recommendations to help improve the performance of the Data transfer process.
Thanks in advance,
Nitin

multiple COMMIT will take longer to complete the task than a single COMMIT at the end!Lets check how much longer it is:
create table T1 as
select OWNER,TABLE_NAME,COLUMN_NAME,DATA_TYPE,DATA_TYPE_MOD,DATA_TYPE_OWNER,DATA_LENGTH,DATA_PRECISION,DATA_SCALE,NULLABLE,COLUMN_ID,DEFAULT_LENGTH,NUM_DISTINCT,LOW_VALUE,HIGH_VALUE,DENSITY,NUM_NULLS,NUM_BUCKETS,LAST_ANALYZED,SAMPLE_SIZE,CHARACTER_SET_NAME,CHAR_COL_DECL_LENGTH,GLOBAL_STATS,USER_STATS,AVG_COL_LEN,CHAR_LENGTH,CHAR_USED,V80_FMT_IMAGE,DATA_UPGRADED,HISTOGRAM
from DBA_TAB_COLUMNS;
insert /*+APPEND*/ into T1 select *from T1;
commit;
-- repeat untill it is >7Mln rows
select count(*) from T1;
9233824
create table T2 as select * from T1;
set autotrace on timing on;
truncate table t2;
declare r number:=0;
begin
for t in (select * from t1) loop
insert into t2 values ( t.OWNER,t.TABLE_NAME,t.COLUMN_NAME,t.DATA_TYPE,t.DATA_TYPE_MOD,t.DATA_TYPE_OWNER,t.DATA_LENGTH,t.DATA_PRECISION,t.DATA_SCALE,t.NULLABLE,t.COLUMN_ID,t.DEFAULT_LENGTH,t.NUM_DISTINCT,t.LOW_VALUE,t.HIGH_VALUE,t.DENSITY,t.NUM_NULLS,t.NUM_BUCKETS,t.LAST_ANALYZED,t.SAMPLE_SIZE,t.CHARACTER_SET_NAME,t.CHAR_COL_DECL_LENGTH,t.GLOBAL_STATS,t.USER_STATS,t.AVG_COL_LEN,t.CHAR_LENGTH,t.CHAR_USED,t.V80_FMT_IMAGE,t.DATA_UPGRADED,t.HISTOGRAM
r:=r+1;
if mod(r,10000)=0 then commit; end if;
end loop;
commit;
end;
--call that couple of times with and without "if mod(r,10000)=0 then commit; end if;" commented.
Results:
One commit
anonymous block completed
Elapsed: 00:11:07.683
Statistics
18474603 recursive calls
0 spare statistic 4
0 ges messages sent
0 db block gets direct
0 calls to kcmgrs
0 PX remote messages recv'd
0 buffer is pinned count
1737 buffer is not pinned count
2 workarea executions - optimal
0 workarea executions - onepass
10000 rows commit
anonymous block completed
Elapsed: 00:10:54.789
Statistics
18475806 recursive calls
0 spare statistic 4
0 ges messages sent
0 db block gets direct
0 calls to kcmgrs
0 PX remote messages recv'd
0 buffer is pinned count
1033 buffer is not pinned count
2 workarea executions - optimal
0 workarea executions - onepass
one commit
anonymous block completed
Elapsed: 00:10:39.139
Statistics
18474228 recursive calls
0 spare statistic 4
0 ges messages sent
0 db block gets direct
0 calls to kcmgrs
0 PX remote messages recv'd
0 buffer is pinned count
1123 buffer is not pinned count
2 workarea executions - optimal
0 workarea executions - onepass
10000 rows commit
anonymous block completed
Elapsed: 00:11:46.259
Statistics
18475707 recursive calls
0 spare statistic 4
0 ges messages sent
0 db block gets direct
0 calls to kcmgrs
0 PX remote messages recv'd
0 buffer is pinned count
1000 buffer is not pinned count
2 workarea executions - optimal
0 workarea executions - onepass
What we've got?
Single commit at the end, avg elapsed: 10:53.4s
Commit every 10000 rows (923 times), avg elapsed: 11:20.5s
Difference:     00:27.1s     3.98%
Multiple commits is just 4% slower. But it is safer regarding Undo consumed.

Dual Drive (SSD) Macbook pro, Data Transfer from SSD to SSD Slow

hello,
I have in my Macbook (early 2011 / 2.3 I5, 8gb ram) a new SSD (Samsung 1TB Evo 840) installed.The old still-functioning SSD (Crucial m4 512GB) i built with an iFixit kit (Dual Drive) in the Optical drive Bay. The two SSD are working.
My problem is this: the data transfer between the plates (a copy Iphoto Library approx 252Gb) is very slow (252 gb approx 5hours).
Does anyone have any idea what could be the problem?

One of the bigger problems with migrating from PowerPC to Intel is not the operating system, but the chip. Migration Assistant has been known to fail for unknown reasons when moving between the Mac platforms. Instead, this user tip has been recommended to avoid such issues:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=435350&tstart=0

Internal Disk to Disk Data Transfer Speed Very Slow

I have a G5 Xserve running Tiger with all updates applied that has recently started experiencing very slow Drive to Drive Data transfer speeds.
When transferring data from one drive to another ( Internal to Internal, Internal to USB, Internal, Internal to FW, USB to USB or any other combination of the three ) we only are getting about 2GB / hr transfer speeds.
I initially thought the internal drive was going bad. I tested the drive and found some minor header issues etc... that were able to be repaired so I replace the internal boot drive
I tested and immediately got the same issue.
I also tried booting from a FW drive and I got the same issue.
If I connect to the server over the ethernet network, I get what I would expect to be typical data transfer rates of about 20GB+ / hr. Much higher than the internal rates and I am copying data from the same internal drives so I really don't think the drive is the issue.
I called AppleCare and discussed the issue with them. They said it sounded like a controller issue so I purchased a replacement MLB from them. After replacing the drive data transfer speeds jumped back to normal for about a day maybe two.
Now we are back to experiencing slow data transfer speeds internally ( 2GB / hr ) and normal transfer speeds ( 20GB+ / hr ) over the network.
Any ideas on what might be causing the problem would be appreciated

As suggested, do check for other I/O load on the spindles. And check for general system load.
I don't know of a good GUI in-built I/O monitor here (and particularly for Tiger Server), though there is iopending and DTrace and Apple-provided [performance scripts|http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1992] with Leopard and Leopard Server. top would show you busy processes.
Also look for memory errors and memory constraints and check for anything interesting in the contents of the system logs.
The next spot after the controllers (and it's usually my first "hardware" stop for these sorts of cases, and usually before swapping the motherboard) are the disks that are involved, and whatever widgets are in the PCI slots. Loose cables, bad cables, and spindle-swaps. Yes, disks can sometimes slow down like this, and that's not usually a Good Thing. I know you think this isn't the disks, but that's one of the remaining common hardware factors. And don't presume any SMART disk monitoring has predictive value; SMART can miss a number of these cases.
(Sometimes you have to use the classic "field service" technique of swapping parts and of shutting down software pieces until the problem goes away. Then work from there.)
And the other question is around how much time and effort should be spent on this Xserve G5 box; whether you're now in the market for a replacement G5 box or a newer Intel Xserve box as a more cost-effective solution.
(How current and how reliable is your disk archive?)

[Solved]Computer slow down and freeze during data transfer syncing

Hello,
Everytime I make a data transfer, my computer slow down, and sometimes freeze during a few seconds, work for a fraction of seconds and freeze again. I don"t understand why.
As an example, here is a bench of files i transfered during a syncing with Grsync
It took about 12h to sync 64Gb.
I've read a lot of topics talking about this problem but nothing works. I tried to switch off the SWAP and setting the vm.dirty_ratio and vm.background_dirty_ratio but nothing works.
I'm making the trasfer between two Western Digital USB 2.0 external hard drive in NTFS.
Does anyone know how to fix this?
Thanks in advance
Last edited by Neldar (2015-03-04 15:54:29)

It seems it was beacause one of my external hard drive was about to die. I performed the same operation with 2 Western Digital external hard drive 1To USB3 and it works perfectly.

PX1267E-1G32 HDD 320GB - slow data transfer

Ok here's the thing!!
I connected my HDD to the computer and I get this message: this driver can perform faster blah blah blah !.... blah
Although on my computer all USB ports are 2.0. Its a laptop that I bought last year and if I connect the HDD on other computers it works fine just not on mine.
I connected other HDDs on my computer they all work extremely fine!
So what should I do? Please help me because I need to back up my data and if the transfer is slow... it'll take years.
Thanks!

Hi,
A suggestion would be to update your chipset drivers. Could you please tell me which Toshiba model and which operating system is on your machine?
In most cases the tosh notebooks have a Intel chipset, so if you have one (you can check this by going into device manager and looking under "System devices" - if you have an intel chipset then many entries with "intel" should be there) then visit www.intel.com and download the latest chipset software.
Install it and give a feedback if it worked.
Greets

Megastick 511 slow data transfer

Hi
I have a 1GB Megastick that should support USB2.0 but it's data transfer is extremly slow. It doesn't give more than some 0.5 MB/s or even less. Is it some kind of firmware or software problem? I tried latest firmware but it did't help...

https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=90221.0
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=81136.0
the Search button is your friend...
now without knowing more details of the system you are connecting your MegaStick too, it is difficult to advise further...

Slow Airport Extreme 5th Gen Data Transfer

Airport Extreme Slow Data Transfer
When transferring files between PC – Nas, Nas – PC, & PC – PC my speeds are extremely slow (1.3 – 3.3mbps). Files range in size from 350mbps to 4gb. Here is my set-up:
Acer Aspire 5532 Win 7 x64 (internal 5ghz nic)
Toshiba Toshiba Satellite C655 Ubuntu 12.04 (internal 5ghz nic)
Gateway GT5418E Win 7 x64 (USB 2ghz nic)
Iomega 2TB Nas
Seagate GoFlex Home 3TB Nas
5th Generation Airport Extreme
Firmware Version: 7.6.3
Wireless Security: WPA2 Personal
Channel: 149 (automatic), 11 Automatic
Radio Mode: 80211.n Only (5ghz) – 80211n Only (2.4ghz)
Multicast Rate: High (also tried low and medium)
Use Wide Channels: Checked
2nd Generation Airport Extreme 5ghz extended network
It doesn’t seem to make a difference if I am using the extended network or sitting 5 feet from the primary (either band) with the extended disabled. I ran a LAN Speed test: averaging 12 – 16mbps write and 20+ read. Any advice would be helpful!
Thanks!

Hi madtytan,
Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
These settings will help ensure maximum performance, security, and reliability when using Wi-Fi.
For more information on this, take a look at this article:
iOS and OS X: Recommended settings for Wi-Fi routers and access points
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4199
Best of luck,
Mario

XP to XP slow data transfer - WRT54GP2

I have two XP sp3 machines in my network. Data transfer between them caps at 1Mbps. This is very odd since both machines have tested at speedtest.net at 15M down and 1M up. Why is my network transfer so slow? What can i try.
A little about my network. All cable is new cat 5e. There are 10/100 NIC's in each machine set to auto negotiate. I have tried setting the NIC's to 100 Full Duplex with no success. Both machines have static IP's assigned. All anti-virus and firewalls are off. Both machines are on the same workgroup and can see each other.
Cable modem connects to a Linksys WRT54GP2 router with built in 10/100 switch. I assume it "auto negotiates" since i cannot find a setting for it.
Machine "A" connects from router through a set of Netgear HDX101 Powerline HD Ethernet Adapters then to the machine. I have also tried bypassing the Powerlines and transferring the data over WIFI. I only get up to 1.5 MB/s transfer speed. My WIFI says im getting 54 MB/s. I was hopping to see near 25 MB/s at least.
Machine "B" connects directly to the router via cat 5e.
I also have a MacBook on network too. It's wifi also suffers from the same transfer rate. If the xp-xp fix doesn't also fix the MacBook i will open a new post about it.
I have read ssoooo much about similiar issues to what im having. im really hoping on of you can help. thanks.
Cesar

The Internet Speed Test and the Data Transfer Speed are the 2 different Things, You Internet Speed is nothing related to your Data Transfer Speed between your Computers. As GV suggested you, connect the Cross Over cable between your computers and assign a Static IP to your both the computers and then transfer the data between your computer and check at what speed the data transfer speed is going on.

Interconnect Data Transfer to SLOW

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for