Interface and Conversion

Where ca we get guidelines and solutions for interface and conversions.
Thanks.

Sounds ike you might be talking about one of the 87 different products that Oracle sells, or perhaps one or two of the 315,683 features that Oracle products has.
Perhaps some details are in order
... and perhaps some digging in the appropriate Documentation at http://docs.oracle.com
... and perhaps asking in a forum (at http://forums.oracle.com) that deals with whatever it is you want, instead of a forum that deals with problems encountered during product download.

Similar Messages

  • Need RICEF Security specfifications for Interfaces and Conversions

    Hi All,
    I need RICEF security specfications for Interfaces and Conversions. Can anyone provide any input on this.
    Regards
    Plaban

    Hi Plaban,
    Thanks for the detailed explanation. As mentioned, as per my knowledge there is no specific guideline/template that you may adapt while designing the security design for the Interfaces and Conversions.
    However, the most common issues that occurs with IDOCs is with file interfaces are related to file permissions, file ownership and character conversions moving between platforms.
    Ensure that the appropriate authorization (read/write and with filters) authorization is provided. Identify the various levels of authorizations required and implement the same.
    Further, most issues with ALE interfaces are with RFC user ID permissions. Ensure that the appropriate and only the Required authorization is provided to these IDs. This way you can tighten the authorization to the specific level. You may need to completely test the functionality before implementing this.
    It is always important to understand these limitations during the functional design. If any specific additional functionality is required, you may need to have a custom based solution.
    Hope this answers your question!!
    Warm Regards,
    Raghu

  • What is the difference between Interface and Conversion?

    Hi friends,
       Can any one teel me What is the difference between Interface and Conversion in detail.
    Rewarded with points
    Thanks & Regards,
    Naren.

    Hi,
       interface can be outbound i.e writing data to
       application server using open dataset,transfer
      or downloading data (gui_download)
       inbound -> reading data from application server using
                  open dataset,read dataset,uploading data
                  using gui_upload.
       conversion:BAtch data communication method
                  where legavy data is uploaded in SAp.
    Regards
    Amole

  • Difference between interface and conversion

    could you give me the difference between interface and conversion

    hi
    <b>Conversion,</b> converting legacy system data into SAP data. Meaning that it is mainly a one shot deal, for example bringing your customer master to SAP from the legacy system, converting the fields used in legacy to the fields and values used in SAP.
    <b>Interface,</b> a program or group of programs that handle the passing of data from one system to another. These programs work together to export the data from one system and import into a target system, maybe these programs run once a day, maybe twice, may every hour throughout the day. It is a good way to keep the data in two or more systems in sync with each other.
    Interface programs are also data extract program. Data is extracted from SAP into a flat file and transferred to other external systems like UNIX, mainframe.
    In data extracts, the file layout is designed and this layout should be in synch with other external systems.
    <b>reward poins for useful ans</b>
    Regards
    Aarti

  • Interface and conversion testing of SAP environments with Master Data

    Hi guy's
    Please let me know if some one of you know about SAP Conversion Project. Below you have more description:
    - testing of Interfaces from Legacy Systems
    - testing of conversion programs used in the conversion or transposition of data from legacy systems
    - data cleansing activities associated with conversion
    - identify and populate various SAP environments with Master Data necessary for both conversion and interface testing
    Any detail info in that and what kind of knowledge you need to have in some of project will be useful.
    Thanks in advance
    Adeel

    Hi Yannick,
    I am trying to do the exact same thing. Have you gotten any further on this issue?

  • Perform Interface and conversion itesting in SAP

    All,
    Kindly guide us thr process of converiosn and interface testing before start of interface yesting?
    How should we capture result?
    Thanks

    Arpit,
    Where did you finally land on this issue?  If this is an ongoing issue I'm quite confident redefining the conversion factors to be  37 TO <> 200 DR will resolve your issue.  Here's an example of what the inventory would look like if receipted at various quantities:
    TO
    DR
    0.185
    1.000
    0.370
    2.000
    2.775
    15.000
    4.995
    27.000
    70.115
    379.000
    145.965
    789.000
    150.035
    811.000
    198.135
    1071.000

  • Interfaces: UOM conversion rate issue

    Hi All,
    We have an outbound interface, which lists all the new subinventory transactions to the third party(then we are updating an attribute column in mtl_material_transactions, so that this record will not be send again). Third party makes all its transactions only in Saleable UOM(SUOM), where as we do all transactions in PUOM. The current logic we are following is, before we are going to send the inventory transactions, we will convert the quantity to SUOM and we will send it.
    Suppose if we transfer 15 quantity from subinventory A to B, and conversion rate between SUOM and PUOM is 5, then we will send 3 as quantity to third party. If the quantity is 12 in PUOM, then we will get 2.4. We are erroring out these type of quantities and informing these type of transactions through mail to the concerned person. We are not updating any attribute column for the error record. So it will always send trough email, as an error record for ever.
    Presently we have the code which i have explained. Suppose the concerned person after receiving the mail, If he do a reverse transaction from B to A, with quantity as 12, then this transaction will also be considered as an error record(as its quantity is 12). And how could the reverse transaction stops the primary transaction from sending through mail.
    We also have other outbound interfaces like move order information and pending PO information. For these interfaces, do we have any option to reverse these transactions. Please let me know.
    Many thanks in advance.

    Hi
    Have you verified EURX and M  for GBP to EUR is maintained as direct quot or indirect quot?
    like if it is direct               -           GBP -      1.2039   -     EUR
         if it is indirect         0.7155     GBP -                     -     EUR
    Reg
    Vishnu

  • TIM Interfaces data conversions

    Hi,
    I appriciate you.
    Pl. tell me what is "TIM interfaces" and
    how to do TIM interfaces data conversions
    thanks
    AC

    Hi Arun,
    This is a very vague question, without any information about the context of your question. But what I did was to go out to google and type in TIM interfaces.
    I think this may be Textile Integrated Manufacturing(TIM) application. The link below takes you to a pdf document about the product.
    http://www.infics.com/collaterals/Datatex.pdf
    I don't know if it has any relevance to you. Check it out or if it is not what you are looking for, please post more information as to how you heard about it and in what context.
    Here are the Google search results
    http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2005-09,GGLD:en&q=%22TIMinterfaces%22
    Srinivas

  • The difference between IEEE802.1Q Native VLAN sub-interface and Physical interface?

    Hello
    I think the following topologies are supported for Cisco Routers
    And the Physical interface also can be using as Native VLAN interface right? 
    Topology 1.
     R1 Gi0.1 ------ IEEE802.1Q Tunneling  L2SW ------ Gi0 R2
    R1 - configuration
    interface GigabitEthernet0.1
     encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
     ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
    Topology 2.
    R1 Gi0 ------ IEEE802.1Q Tunneling L2SW ------ Gi0 R2
    interface GigabitEthernet0
    ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
     And is it ok to use the physical interface and sub-interface with dynamic routing such as EIGRP or OSPF etc?
    R1 Gi 0 ---- Point to Multipoint EIGRP or OSPF ---- Gi0 R2 / R3 
          Gi 0.20--- Point to Point EIGRP or OSPF --- Gi0.10 R4  (same VLAN-ID) 
    R1 - configuration
    interface GigabitEthernet0
     ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
    interface GigabitEthernet8.20
     encapsulation dot1Q 20
     ip address 20.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
    Any information is very appreciated. but if there is any CCO document please let me know.
    Thank you very much and regards,
    Masanobu Hiyoshi

    Hello,
    The diagram is helpful.
    If I am getting you correctly, you have three routers interconnected by a switch, and you want them to operate in a hub-and-spoke fashion even though the switch is capable of allowing direct communication between any of these routers.
    Your first scenario is concerned with all three routers being in the same VLAN, and by using neighbor commands, you force these routers to establish targeted EIGRP adjacencies R1-R2 and R1-R3, with R1 being the hub.
    Your second scenario is concerned with creating one VLAN per spoke, having subinterfaces for each spoke VLAN created on R1 as the router, and putting each spoke just in its own VLAN.
    Your scenarios are not really concerned with the concept of native VLAN or the way it is configured, to be honest. Whether you use a native VLAN in either of your scenarios, or whether you configure the native VLAN on a subinterface or on the physical interface makes no difference. There is simply no difference to using or not using a native VLAN in any of your scenarios, and there is no difference to the native VLAN configuration being placed on a physical interface or a subinterface. It's as plain as that. Both your scenarios will work.
    My personal opinion, though, is that forcing routers on a broadcast multi-access segment such as Ethernet to operate in a hub-and-spoke fashion is somewhat artificial. Why would you want to do this? Both scenarios have drawbacks: in the first scenario, you need to add a neighbor statement for each spoke to the hub, limiting the scalability. In the second scenario, you waste VLANs and IP subnets if there are many spokes. The primary question is, though: why would you want an Ethernet segment to operate as a hub-and-spoke network? Sure, these things are done but they are motivated by specific needs so I would like to know if you have any.
    Even if you needed your network to operate in a hub-and-spoke mode, there are more efficient means of achieving that: Cisco switches support so-called protected ports that are prevented from talking to each other. By configuring the switch ports to spokes as protected, you will prevent the spokes from seeing each other. You would not need, then, to configure static neighbors in EIGRP, or to waste VLANs for individual spokes. What you would need to do would be deactivating the split horizon on R1's interface, and using the ip next-hop-self eigrp command on R1 to tweak the next hop information to point to R1 so that the spokes do not attempt to route packets to each other directly but rather route them over R1.
    I do not believe I have seen any special CCO documents regarding the use of physical interfaces or subinterfaces for native VLAN or for your scenarios.
    Best regards,
    Peter

  • What is the diffrence between My Runnable Interface and Java Runnable

    Hi folks
    all we know that interfaces in java just a decleration for methods and variables.
    so my Question is why when i create an interface its name is "Runnable" and i declared a method called "run" inside it.then when i implements this interface with any class don't do the thread operation but when i implement the java.lang.Runnable the thread is going fine.
    so what is the diffrence between My Runnable Interface and Java Runnable?
    thnx

    Hi folks
    all we know that interfaces in java just a decleration
    for methods and variables.
    so my Question is why when i create an interface its
    name is "Runnable" and i declared a method called
    "run" inside it.then when i implements this interface
    with any class don't do the thread operation but when
    i implement the java.lang.Runnable the thread is going
    fine.
    so what is the diffrence between My Runnable Interface
    and Java Runnable?
    thnxClasses and interfaces are not identified by just their "name", like Runnable. The actual "name" the compiler uses is java.lang.Runnable. So even if you duplicate the Runnable interface in your own package, it's not the same as far as the compiler is concerned, because it's in a different package.
    Try importing both java.util.* and java.awt.* (which both have a class or interface named List), and then try to compile List myList = new ArrayList();

  • Portege M750 and Win8 - metro interface, and touchpad don't work

    For those of you that, as myself, tryed to install windows 8 in a Toshiba Portege M750 and had problems in portrait tablet mode I recommend the following driver it works perfectly:
    http://cdn.wacom.com/U/drivers/TabletPC/ISD_DualTouch_710-8.zip
    The problem I had was that swipe didn't work with metro interface, and touch didn't work also and in portrait, strangely, when you touch the secren two arrows with different directions woul appear.
    This driver solved my problem.
    Hope that this can help...

    Problem with wacom dual touch driver solved

  • Whats the difference between an INTERFACE and a CLASS?

    Whats the difference between an INTERFACE and a CLASS?
    Please help.
    Thanx.

    http://search.java.sun.com/search/java/index.jsp?col=javaforums&qp=%2Bforum%3A31&qt=Difference+between+interface+and+class

  • Difference between abstract interface and normal interface

    Hello Friends,
    What is the Difference between abstract interface and normal interface?....

    What is the Difference between abstract interface and
    normal interface?....The difference is that you didn't follow convention in the first case. All interfaces are implicitly abstract so you don't have to declare them as such.

  • INTERFACE AND EVENTS IN ABAP OO

    Can some one explain me the real time need with example for use of interfaces and events in abap objects
    (asking interface and events along doesnt mean that i am relating them).
    <removed_by_moderator>
    Pankaj Giri
    Edited by: Julius Bussche on Jul 14, 2008 1:36 PM

    Events :
    Technically speaking :
    " Events are notifications an object receives from, or transmits to, other objects or applications. Events allow objects to perform actions whenever a specific occurrence takes place. Microsoft Windows is an event-driven operating system, events can come from other objects, applications, or user input such as mouse clicks or key presses. "
    Lets say you have an ALV - An editable one ...
    Lats say - Once you press some button  you want some kind of validation to be done.
    How to do this ?
    Raise an Event - Which is handled by a method and write the validation code.
    Now you might argue, that I can do it in this way : Capture the function code - and call the validate method.
    Yes, in this case it can be done.. But lets say .. you change a field in the ALV and you want the validation to be done as soon as he is done with typing.
    Where is the function code here ? No function code... But there is an event here - The data changed event.
    So you can raise a data changed event that can be handled and will do the validation.
    It is not user friendly that you ask the user to press a button (to get the function code) for validation each time he enters a data.
    The events can be raised by a system, or by a program also. So in this case the data changed event is raised by a system that you can handle.
    Also, Lets say on a particular action you want some code to trigger. (You can take the same example of validation code). In this case the code to trigger is in a separate class. The object of which is not available here at this moment. (This case happens very frequently).
    Advantage with events : Event handlers can be in a separate class also.
    e.g : In the middle of some business logic .. you encounter a error. You want to send this information to the UI (to user - in form of a pop up) and then continue with some processing.
    In many cases - A direct method call to trigger the pop up is not done. Because (in ideal cases) the engine must not interact with UI directly - Because the UI could be some other application - like a windows UI but the error comes from some SAP program.
    So - A event is raised from the engine that is handled in the UI and a pop up is triggered.
    Here -- I would have different classes (lets say for different Operating Systems). And all these classes must register to the event ERROR raised in application.
    And these different classes for different Operation systems will have different code to raise a pop-up.
    Now you can imagine : If you coded a pop-up for Windows (in your application logic) .. it will not work for Mac or Linux. But of you raise a event.. that is handled separately by a different UI classes for Win, Linux or Mac  they will catch this event and process accordingly.
    May be I complicated this explanation .... but I couldn't think of a simpler and concrete example.
    Cheers.
    Varun.

  • Firewire Interface and Microphone Choices?

    Was looking to drop no more than 500 dollars on a firewire interface and less than 175 in a microphone to do some decent quality recording onto my MB (primarily trumpet, ukulele and acoustic guitar). For the interface I've been looking at the:
    Apogee Duet
    http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Apogee-Duet-Firewire-Interface?sku=234444
    And for the mic, the:
    MXL 992
    http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/MXL-MXL-992-LargeDiaphragm-Condenser-Micr ophone?sku=273162
    Any feedback on these two products or have any other recommendations? Thanks for the help.

    MBaltrusitis wrote:
    Was looking to drop no more than 500 dollars on a firewire interface and less than 175 in a microphone to do some decent quality recording onto my MB (primarily trumpet, ukulele and acoustic guitar). For the interface I've been looking at the:
    Apogee Duet
    http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Apogee-Duet-Firewire-Interface?sku=234444
    And for the mic, the:
    MXL 992
    http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/MXL-MXL-992-LargeDiaphragm-Condenser-Micr ophone?sku=273162
    Any feedback on these two products or have any other recommendations? Thanks for the help.
    If you don't need a lot of inputs and outputs, but are looking for decent sound quality, the Apogee Duet seems like a good deal.
    I'm not familiar with the mic.

Maybe you are looking for