Interface Objects missing in ESR

Hello,
I have created a whole bunch of interface objects under my namespace in the ESR. During message mapping, when I try to do a u201CFind design objectu201D in the message mapping definition under my namespace, I canu2019t find any of the objects listed. Although if I go under the u201CSignatureu201D tab, I can find my objects under message type or external message. Why is it acting different in PI 7.1?
Sam

HI,
Try to activate those objects and try to have cache refreshment. Probably the cache problem may cause this kind of starnge behaviour.
Thanks
Swarup

Similar Messages

Mapping Objects Missing in ESR

Hi All,
currently in my PO dev system mapping objects are missing
Service Pack Version: 05
Release:NW731EXT_10_REL.
please advice me how to do it .

hi Vidya,
Please share more information. What do you mean by no Mapping objects available.
Do you mean u are creating objects but its getting disappeared.
or are you expecting some pre-delivered objects.
Please share more details.
thanks and regards,
Praveen t

Dolby Advanced Audio Interface software missing HP Pavilion Ultrabook 14-b003sa

I updated my HP Pavilion Ultrabook 14-boo3sa to windows 8.1 a couple months ago and since then the dolby advanced audio interface software is missing. The speakers are working and sound fine but I just want the option of the equaliser again. I have looked at the drivers available online and the most upto date driver for audio for this laptop is an IDT audio driver from 2012 for windows 8. Is there a more upto date driver that has the interface software? or is it just a case that the software has been removed on the update due to compatability issues? It sounds like dolby advanced audio is still active there is just no interface available as before I updated to windows 8.1. Please help. Thank you.

Hi Lhawley91,
I understand you are having issues with the Dolby Advanced Audio Interface software missing HP Pavilion Ultrabook 14-b003sa. This package contains the driver that enables the IDT High-Definition (HD) Audio for Windows 8.1.
http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/softwareDownloadIndex?softwareitem=ob-112631-1&cc=us&dlc=en&lc=en...
Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the bottom to say “Thanks” for helping!

Status LIS9 of the User interface MP000200 missing

Hi All,
While creating leaving action. System is giving error (Status LIS9 of the User interface MP000200 missing.
Mentions below are my configuration.
Infogroup
COP 0001 Org assignment
LIS9 0002 Personal Data
LIS9 0006 address
LIS9 0105 Communication
And Personnel Action type are:- 0 0 0 MSN20 (Tick) (Tick) (Not tick)
Let me know how to resolve it.
Regard
Ashish

Hi,
make sure that LIS9 should not be used to the Infotypes which are having Time Constraint 1
Check V_T582A for time constratints and also check V_T588D to remove the operation LIS9 forLeaving/ termination action.
for your information
Infotype 0002 should NEVER be delimited as part of the Leaving Action.
The help text for the Operations field of the Info Group states the following:
In the Leaving action, use the "delimit" (LIS9) operation to delimit records.
Please remove the infotype 0002 from the info group, then run the leaving action, you will not find an error message
The reason why you get the error is because the status LIS9 does not exist on MP000200 .
You can see this via the menu painter via SE41.
regards,
mohammed
Edited by: 0mohammed1 on Oct 14, 2011 1:51 PM

About Interface objects in Integration Repository

Hi All,
   I want to know details about Data type enhancements & Context objects in Interface Objects.Please help me.
Thanks,
GOPI.

Hi Gopikishor,
        _Context objects:_ Its nothing but to access a element payload of the message,in Simple terms, X-Path expressions in the repoistery..
Deeply Nested elements in the Message structure.
Ex:
<Header>
     <PurchaseOrgData>
            <Sender>
                   <PurchaseData> Goods</PurchaseData>
             </Sender>
     </PurchaseOrgData>
</Header>
Define X-path for the above structure: \Header\PurchaseOrgData\Sender\PurchaseData\
Once we can define the "Context Objects" we can use following situations..
1) Receiver Determination: During the Receiver Condition in the Integration directory,
2) Integration Process: During the processing business process depends upon content of message.
Datatype Enhancement:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/a5/04623c4f69b712e10000000a114084/frameset.htm.
Regards,
Sateesh N.

No interface objects found in interface determination

Hi Experts,
              i am configuring the multiple idoc to flat file.
             for this, i am not using the bpm.
            i refer the following blog.
           https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/4443. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
       According to this blog, we can make the scenario as file to file. xi will pick the idoc-xml file.
    for this, could you please let me know the source data type?
   i exported standard idoc and made occurances as unbounded and import to name space.
   for the imported external defination, i creared the message interface as outbound and used as sender interface.
i made the mapping between external deficnation to flat file structure.
my IR part is ok.
i have problem with ID.
when i configure the interface determination, i found it as no interface objects found.

Hi,
Normally we dont require to create DT , MT MI incase we are using IDOC.
But in your case you imported the idoc and exported it to ur desktop and changed the Occurance of that IDOC.
Then again you imported that as External Def.
This case you need to create the MI for this IDOC, why because we dont have the option to select the External def directly with out creating the MI at the time of creation of Interface mapping.
But in case of IDOC means we have the provision to select the IDOC derectly at the time of Interface mappimg
Regards
Seshagiri

FI/CO interface: Object type not clear

Hi guyes
When we try to release the billing document to accounting we are getting the below message. Kindly help me to find the problem
FI/CO interface: Object type not clear Message No. RW010
regards
Hari

Hi
Please find below
FI/CO interface: Object type not clear
Message no. RW010
Diagnosis
The FI/CO interface was called with an object type which is not clear: VBRK and .
System response
The document cannot be posted.
Procedure
There is a system error. Contact the SAP Hotline service.

Creating interface objects in the IR

I want to create a scenario in which I send a file from a Legacy system to the XI, process the message using the BPM and send it to SAP R/3.
In the integration repository I have 3 software components (one for each system: legacy, SAP APPL, SAP BASIS)
Where am I supposed to create the interface objects ? (AM I supposed to create all the objects under one namespace in one software component or maybe create in each software component only the relevant objects ?!?!)
The problem is that I always get to a point where I need to use objects that I defined in other software component... (and are not reachable)

Hi,
All structure pretaining to legacy side, create in legacy SWCV. For processing the message in XI, you can probably create a SWCV for middleware, so that all processing logic, mapping you can create it here. Maintain the R/3 structures in R/3 SWCV.
Also make sure, you create dependencies among these SWCV in the SLD, so that you can use one SWCV objects in other SWCV.
Thanks,
Sasi

Reference data types in interface objects?

How do you create reference data type based on data type in interface object??

First create the reference DT1 in IR then create a new data type DT2 and if you want to create a reference to DT1 then in the editor select Type (3rd coloum) as the DT1 which you can get by double click on Type and then you select "search help" and select DT1 from the list.
Cheer's

Interface objects not appearing

Hi,
When I tried to open interface objects in integration repository.It asked for password.After giving password I got prompt that server connection established successfully.
But I can't see any interface objects or mapping objects.
Kindly help
Regards,
Ruby

Hi,
sometimes it happens so. Use the Refresh button on hte
Top Left corner to refresh the Objects.
Even if that dosen't work. Close the IB and open it again...
Cheers,
Siva Maranani.

Error generating Client Proxy - object missing in WSDL

Hello,
I have error while generating Client Proxy.
I have WSDL and XSD in files. I get error message:
object <message name="requestUPOMessage"> missing in WSDL
Diagnosis
In the WSDL document, the object
   "<portType name="GateServicePortType"> <operatio..."
from the namespace
"https://bramka.edeklaracje. mf.gov.pl/"
links to the object
   "<message name="requestUPOMessage">"
from the namespace
   "https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"
However, this last object does not exist in the WSDL document.
WSDL FILE and XSD FILE: http://www.sendspace.com/filegroup/N8kSxPp5bhY2nVfcNBbAXg
WSDL:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<wsdl:definitions xmlns:soap12="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap12/"
xmlns:mime="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/"
xmlns:http="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/http/" xmlns:ns="https://bramka.edeklaracje.
mf.gov.pl/xsd" xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"
xmlns:gate="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"
xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" targetNamespace="https://bramka.edeklaracje.
mf.gov.pl/">
<wsdl:types>
<xs:schema attributeFormDefault="qualified" elementFormDefault="qualified"
targetNamespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/xsd"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xs:include schemaLocation="GateService.xsd"/>
</xs:schema>
</wsdl:types>
<wsdl:message name="sendDocumentWithAttachmentResponseMessage">
<wsdl:part name="part1" element="ns:sendDocumentWithAttachmentResponse">
</wsdl:part>
</wsdl:message>
<wsdl:message name="sendUnsignDocumentResponseMessage">
<wsdl:part name="part1" element="ns:sendUnsignDocumentResponse">
</wsdl:part>
</wsdl:message>
<wsdl:message name="requestUPOResponseMessage">
<wsdl:part name="part1" element="ns:requestUPOResponse">
</wsdl:part>
</wsdl:message>
<wsdl:message name="sendDocumentResponseMessage">
<wsdl:part name="part1" element="ns:sendDocumentResponse">
</wsdl:part>
</wsdl:message>
<wsdl:message name="sendUnsignDocumentMessage">
<wsdl:part name="part1" element="ns:sendUnsignDocument">
</wsdl:part>
</wsdl:message>
<wsdl:message name="sendDocumentMessage">
<wsdl:part name="part1" element="ns:sendDocument">
</wsdl:part>
</wsdl:message>
<wsdl:message name="requestUPOMessage">
<wsdl:part name="part1" element="ns:requestUPO">
</wsdl:part>
</wsdl:message>
<wsdl:message name="sendDocumentWithAttachmentMessage">
<wsdl:part name="part1" element="ns:sendDocumentWithAttachment">
</wsdl:part>
</wsdl:message>
<wsdl:portType name="GateServicePortType">
<wsdl:operation name="sendDocument">
<wsdl:input message="gate:sendDocumentMessage">
</wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output message="gate:sendDocumentResponseMessage">
</wsdl:output>
</wsdl:operation>
<wsdl:operation name="sendUnsignDocument">
<wsdl:input message="gate:sendUnsignDocumentMessage">
</wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output message="gate:sendUnsignDocumentResponseMessage">
</wsdl:output>
</wsdl:operation>
<wsdl:operation name="sendDocumentWithAttachment">
<wsdl:input message="gate:sendDocumentWithAttachmentMessage">
</wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output message="gate:sendDocumentWithAttachmentResponseMessage">
</wsdl:output>
</wsdl:operation>
<wsdl:operation name="requestUPO">
<wsdl:input message="gate:requestUPOMessage">
</wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output message="gate:requestUPOResponseMessage">
</wsdl:output>
</wsdl:operation>
</wsdl:portType>
<wsdl:binding name="GateServiceSOAP12Binding" type="gate:GateServicePortType">
<soap12:binding style="document" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
<wsdl:operation name="sendDocument">
<soap12:operation soapAction="urn:sendDocument" style="document"/>
<wsdl:input>
<soap12:body use="literal" namespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"/>
</wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output>
<soap12:body use="literal" namespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"/>
</wsdl:output>
</wsdl:operation>
<wsdl:operation name="sendUnsignDocument">
<soap12:operation soapAction="urn:sendUnsignDocument" style="document"/>
<wsdl:input>
<soap12:body use="literal" namespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"/>
</wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output>
<soap12:body use="literal" namespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"/>
</wsdl:output>
</wsdl:operation>
<wsdl:operation name="sendDocumentWithAttachment">
<soap12:operation soapAction="urn:sendDocumentWithAttachment" style="document"/>
<wsdl:input>
<soap12:body use="literal" namespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"/>
</wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output>
<soap12:body use="literal" namespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"/>
</wsdl:output>
</wsdl:operation>
<wsdl:operation name="requestUPO">
<soap12:operation soapAction="urn:requestUPO" style="document"/>
<wsdl:input>
<soap12:body use="literal" namespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"/>
</wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output>
<soap12:body use="literal" namespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"/>
</wsdl:output>
</wsdl:operation>
</wsdl:binding>
<wsdl:binding name="GateServiceSOAP11Binding" type="gate:GateServicePortType">
<soap:binding style="document" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
<wsdl:operation name="sendDocument">
<soap:operation soapAction="urn:sendDocument" style="document"/>
<wsdl:input>
<soap:body use="literal" namespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"/>
</wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output>
<soap:body use="literal" namespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"/>
</wsdl:output>
</wsdl:operation>
<wsdl:operation name="sendUnsignDocument">
<soap:operation soapAction="urn:sendUnsignDocument" style="document"/>
<wsdl:input>
<soap:body use="literal" namespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"/>
</wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output>
<soap:body use="literal" namespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"/>
</wsdl:output>
</wsdl:operation>
<wsdl:operation name="sendDocumentWithAttachment">
<soap:operation soapAction="urn:sendDocumentWithAttachment" style="document"/>
<wsdl:input>
<soap:body use="literal" namespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"/>
</wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output>
<soap:body use="literal" namespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"/>
</wsdl:output>
</wsdl:operation>
<wsdl:operation name="requestUPO">
<soap:operation soapAction="urn:requestUPO" style="document"/>
<wsdl:input>
<soap:body use="literal" namespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"/>
</wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output>
<soap:body use="literal" namespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/"/>
</wsdl:output>
</wsdl:operation>
</wsdl:binding>
<wsdl:service name="GateService">
<wsdl:port name="GateServiceSOAP12port" binding="gate:GateServiceSOAP12Binding">
<soap12:address location="https://test-bramka.edeklaracje.gov.pl/uslugi/dokumenty/"/>
</wsdl:port>
<wsdl:port name="GateServiceSOAP11port" binding="gate:GateServiceSOAP11Binding">
<soap:address location="https://test-bramka.edeklaracje.gov.pl/uslugi/dokumenty/"/>
</wsdl:port>
</wsdl:service>
</wsdl:definitions>
XSD
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="https://bramka.edeklaracje.
mf.gov.pl/xsd" targetNamespace="https://bramka.e-deklaracje.mf.gov.pl/xsd"
elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="qualified">
<xs:element name="sendDocument">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="document" type="xs:base64Binary"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="sendDocumentResponse">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="refId" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/>
<xs:element name="status" type="xs:int"/>
<xs:element name="statusOpis" type="xs:string"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="sendUnsignDocument">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="document" type="xs:base64Binary"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="sendUnsignDocumentResponse">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="refId" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/>
<xs:element name="status" type="xs:int"/>
<xs:element name="statusOpis" type="xs:string"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="sendDocumentWithAttachment">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="attachment" type="xs:base64Binary" minOccurs="0"/>
<xs:element name="document" type="xs:base64Binary"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="sendDocumentWithAttachmentResponse">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="refId" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/>
<xs:element name="status" type="xs:int"/>
<xs:element name="statusOpis" type="xs:string"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="requestUPO">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="refId" type="xs:string"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="requestUPOResponse">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="upo" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/>
<xs:element name="status" type="xs:int"/>
<xs:element name="statusOpis" type="xs:string"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:schema>
Maybe someone know what is wrong in wsdl file and how to correct this?

Hi Marcus,
Did you fix the problem?
I'm asking because I'm dealing with the same problem! I tried to generate a Proxy object from a WSDL document and I can't... I always receive the error "Cannot generate proxy (object missing in WSDL, see long text)". I have checked on the service.sap.com and I found a xls document with all unsupported WSDL elements and one of them is the "part name=" and I have it in my WSDL! I don't know how to workaround this issue, can you help me please?
Thanks in advance,
Ricardo.

OBIEE UI Interface is missing prompt functionality and Column Selector

Hi,
OBIEE UI Interface is missing prompt functionality and Column Selector in Answers when creating a report. This problem occurs on all the reports. Also the problem occurs in firefox too. Could you please suggest me any suggestion to overcome this issue.
Thanks and Regards

May sound stupid, but do you have the Privileges to add these things to a report? These features can be turned on/off from the Privilege Administration Screen, for a group or user. Have a look.
Cheers,
A.

Receiver RFC - Interface Objects

Hi every one,
I have a scenario, SOAP (SYNC)- XI - RFC (SYNC), MY question is do we need to create and interface objects for the receiver. Or can I use the RFC as the interface object.
Technical explanation would really help me.
Please clear.
Thanks,
-Naveen.

Hi Naveen,
<i>>>>>>do we need to create and interface objects for the receiver. Or can I use the RFC as the interface object.</i>
As RFC itself is a interface you need not create a seperate interface for an RFC.
In message mapping you will need to create two message mapping.
One SOAP_Req to RFC_Req
two RFC_Res to SOAP_Res.
When you will try to implement Interface Mapping, the source interface would be the imported 'External defination' of WSDL and the receiver would be the RFC. In the lower section of the same screen click 'Response' tab and add RFC_Res to SOAP_Res as mapping prog and under 'Request' tab add SOAP_Req to RFC_Req.
Let me know if you further assistance.
regards,
Ashish

Interface objects

We are doing a scenario of sending Sales order idocs to Soap messages using XI. Do I still have to do the business scenario settings or can I go with the interface objects and the mapping objects??
Also there is a little confusion whie setting the interface objects. Do I need to create one for the Idoc(from R/3) and one for the SOAP Message and what would be the directions (outbound/inbound) for each interface..
-Ken

Hi,
Thanks for a very informative reply..I am awarding you points..I still have some questions...I have set up a message interface in interface objects for the Idoc coming in from r/3 to XI..I bet this will be a inbound as its coming into XI ...RIGHT???...
By your reply when I map this Idoc to a SOAP , I need to set up another message interface for this SOAP in repository and it would be synchronous and outbound ..RIGHT??...
Am I correct with my idea to use a HTTPS adapter for the SOAP...So inthis case an incoming message (response) is needed...How do I map it and to which I need to map it? You mentioned the BAPI method ....Does it bypass the HTTP ADAPTER step..I am not sure how it needs to be done..Any help would be appreciated...
-Ken

Pool : best practice ODI : PLSQL or Interface object ?

Hello,
My ODI consultant has developped an interface to load a flat file into Hyperion Planning :
* first step : load flat file into staging : done with "Interface" object
* second step : transform staging table (1,2,3 ==> JAN, FEB, MAR // transform "-" into ND_Customer ... very easy transformation !) : done trough a PLSQL Procedure. Result is load into FACT_TABLE
* third step : load FACT_TABLE into ESSBASE : done with "interface" object
During design, we didn't discuss the technology, but after the build, I'm very suprised by the second step. There is no justification to do it with PLSQL. My consultant explains me : "I'd rather to use PLSQL". But from my point of view, ODI best practice is to use "Interface" (more flexible, you can change the topology without impact in interface etc ...)
What is your point of view? Should I raise an issue and expect from my consultant a rewriting with "interface" object?
Rgds

Thx SH, the complexity (use of two intermediate tables : STAGING and FACT) is due to our requirment to archive the original data during one year (in STAGING) and to give an audit trail from Essbase to original data (before transformation). From Essbase we could go back to FACT Table (same member name) then goes back to STAGING by using and unique ID that produces a link between tables.
From my point of view ODI Interface is the simplier way to maintain the "mapping", instead of PLSQL, but I would have more feedbacks from other developper to be sure of my feeling (I've done only 2 Hyperion Planning + ODI Project before the current one).
The complexity of interface are low or medium : simple filter on one or two dimensions / DECODE mapping on Month / group by on similar records / for few interfaces, more complexe rules with IF statement.
Thx in adavance

Interface Objects missing in ESR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for