Interface vlan does not up!

Hi all,
I create a vlan follows an interface vlan, but the interface vlan does not up.
I'm using RSP7600 Adv IP Service with ES20 line card. Please help.
Thanks million!

Hello,
A SVI interface for a VLAN X will be up/up if there is an access port alive in the VLAN X on the switch, or if there is a trunk port alive on the switch on which the VLAN X is allowed. Are these requirements met in your particular case?
Best regards,
Peter

Similar Messages

Interface Builder does not open when I click Mainwindow.xib file on Monotouch.

I did a lot research about it, What the most of view say it is because of the iOS SDK, not because of the MonoTouch, they say that iOS SDK provides the Interface Builder? Any suggestions? Thanks in advance. iOS SDK Version 4.3.

Does Monotouch work within Xcode? I'm not sure what it is. If so then Interface Builder does not open a separate window in Xcode 4. When you first go to your .xib, you must select your "Window" to see the window. Otherwise you get an empty grid. Here's an image with the "Window" selected. I have it set for Mac applications not iOS but what you have should look similar.

Interface Controller does not exist

Having implemented Compliance Calibrator 5.3, I've configured the JCo and am getting the following error message below.
WARNING: *** Job Exception: Interface Controller does not exist for Component Instance VirsaXSR3_02 in Component Usage VirsaXSR3_02
com.sap.tc.webdynpro.services.exceptions.WDRuntimeException: Interface Controller does not exist for Component Instance VirsaXSR3_02 in Component Usage VirsaXSR3_02
I have searched the forum and found only one other message pertaining to this issue. I need to figure out how to address this error. Here is what I have done already:
1. Tested the JCo - it tested and pinged properly
2. Tested the RTA user - the user has the necessary authorizations
I'm considering deleting and recreating the connector, but I don't see the point as the connector obviously connects to the backend. I know this because I had some RFC errors that disappeared when I granted the authorizations to the user specified in the JCo.
Please let me know.
Thanks,
Santosh

Here you go.
Row     VSYSKEY SYSNAME SYSTYPE SYSCON1 SYSCON2 SYSCON3 SYSCON4 SYSCON5 STATUS MGMTRLVNT       SYSCON6 SYSCON7 SYSCON8 SYSCON9 EXTOBJ
1       SANDBOX1        SB1     SAP     JCO     VIRSAXSR3_01_MODEL      VIRSAXSR3_01_METADATA   JAVA            0       0       rdgspd2s                                N
2       SB3     SANDBOX3        SAP     JCO     VIRSAXSR3_03_MODEL      VIRSAXSR3_03_METADATA   JAVA            0       0       rdgspd2s                                N
3       SANDBOX2        SB2     SAP     JCO     VIRSAXSR3_02_MODEL      VIRSAXSR3_02_METADATA   JAVA            0       0       rdgspd2s                                N
4       SANDBOX Sandbox environments    LSYS    SANDBOX SANDBOX                         0       1
5       SB2_RE SB2_RE SAP     JCO     VIRSAXSR3_01_MODEL      VIRSAXSR3_01_METADATA   JAVA            0       0       rdgspd2s                                N

Interface Vlan is not installed in routing table

Dear All,
Today I faced a strange problem and I want to share it with you to find what is the problem ?
we have a VRF for one customer and we use interface vlan to define customer's branch.
The customer interface is VLAN 422 and it is defined under customer VRF probably .
PE#sh running-config vrf V3056:RIYADHBANK
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 1321 bytes
ip vrf V3056:RIYADHBANK
rd 65000:3887
maximum routes 1400 80
route-target export 65000:5405
route-target import 65000:5405
route-target import 65000:5406
interface Vlan422
description By *****
ip vrf forwarding V3056:RIYADHBANK
ip address 172.29.12.97 255.255.255.252
service-policy input 2M_IN
PE#sh vlan id 422
VLAN Name Status Ports
422 422 active Gi3/0/11 efp_id 422
VLAN Type SAID MTU Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2
422 enet 100422 1500 - - - - - 0 0
Remote SPAN VLAN
Disabled
Primary Secondary Type Ports
PE#
we can see the interface vlan is up
PE-L3Agg-Khu-107-2#sh int vlan 422 description
Interface Status Protocol Description
Vl422 up up ****
PE#
and we can see the vlan 422 belongs to the correct VRF
PE#sh vrf V3056:RIYADHBANK
Name Default RD Protocols Interfaces
V3056:RIYADHBANK 65000:3887 ipv4 Vl627
Vl775
Vl422
PE#
when we tried to troubleshoot the customer routing we found :
PE-L3Agg-Khu-107-2#ping vrf V3056:RIYADHBANK 172.29.12.97
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.29.12.97, timeout is 2 seconds:
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
PE-#
we could not ping the ip address of interface vlan 422.
PE#sh ip route vrf V3056:RIYADHBANK 172.29.12.97
Routing Table: V3056:RIYADHBANK
% Subnet not in table
PE#
PE#show ip route vrf V3056:RIYADHBANK connected
Routing Table: V3056:RIYADHBANK
Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, H - NHRP, l - LISP
+ - replicated route, % - next hop override
Gateway of last resort is 192.168.111.16 to network 0.0.0.0
172.29.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 338 subnets, 2 masks
C 172.29.12.44/30 is directly connected, Vlan627
L 172.29.12.45/32 is directly connected, Vlan627
PE-L3Agg-Khu-107-2#
PE-L3Agg-Khu-107-2#
My question is: Why the interface vlan 422 is not installed in VRF Table as it is UP ??
thanks in advance!
Rashed Wardi.

what platform is this? can you please paste the output of show version and show run?
Also when you tested this was int Gi3/0/11 up/up?
Best Regards,
Bheem

Interface Mapping does not exist in runtime cache

Hi,
I have a scenario of RFC to SOAP, when I do the test I get the error message "Interface mapping http://sapxi.xxx.co.za/XXXXXX/ InterfaceMapping_Name does not exist in runtime cache"
Regards
Scharlotte

Hi...
Try to re-create the Interface mapping.
And also test your Configuration with test tool where you can find the error on which step.
if the error found in interface mapping.. do re-create the interface determination step and receiver agreement.
Provide the payload which is taken from sxmb_moni --> Inbound msg --> Payload
u can follow this blog for how to test configuration part:
Test Your XI Configuration With The New Test Tool
Regards,
Parvathy

Error : Interface mapping does not exist in runtime Cache

Hello Guys
I have a simple SOAP-To-RFC connection which was working fine until recently. I have not made any changes
but the data is not getting transfered from one point to another.
I checked SXMB_MONI and saw the following error:
Interface mapping http://cincom.com/config AddConfig does not exist in runtime cache
Then I went and checked SXI_CACHE and it says 'Cache contents are upto date' with a green light.
Just to be on the safer side, I shutdown and restarted XI server selecting All tasks.
But still has the same problem.
Can some one help me with this? I would really appreciate it.
Thanks
Ram

Hi,
We too faced the same problem.
Do the following
1) Delete the Interface mapping and re-create it
2) First test your Config with test tool
/people/paul.medaille/blog/2005/06/24/test-your-xi-configuration-with-the-new-test-tool
I think here you will find the error on Interface mapp or Receiver agreement
Then delete the interface det and receiver agreement also and re-create those.
Make sure that u have provided the sample payload which is taken from MONI--Inbound msg--Payload
Then finally u will get the success
Regards
Seshagiri

Enhanced Interface Determination - does not work!

Hi guys,
well i have a scenario where i have done a multi mapping where MT_TYPSCH is generated for each new value which occurs in one special source field.
<NO>1</NO>
<NO>2</NO>
<NO>3</NO>
..so three MT will be generated.
Now i would like these messages devided to different Business Services where each one has on FTP-CC to write a file with a certain filename, e.g. File1.txt, File2.txt, File3.txt.
Therefore i thought i use different receivers in Receiver Determination with using Conditions and pointing to a value in field with XPATH. So depending on field <NO> the message should be routed to the given receiver targets.
I surely use the enhanced Interface Determination because i use multi mapping.
But when i run test, i receive 3 files with different names but same content. For me the receiver determination is not working that good.
Can someone help me on this?!
source:
<ZBC0>
<IDOC BEGIN="">
<EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="">
<ZBC0 SEGMENT=""> 0...9999
<NO>1</NO>
<TYPE>1B20-6</TYPE>
<SPEC>152J</SPEC>
</ZBC0>
<ZBC0 SEGMENT="1">
<NO>2</NO>
<TYPE>1B20-6</TYPE>
<SPEC>152J</SPEC>
</IDOC>
</ZBC0>
target:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<MT_TYPSCH> 1..1
<TYPSCHRecordSet> 1..1
<TYPSCHDetailsStruc> 1..unbounded
<FELD1/> {represents content of <No>}
<FELD2/>
<FELD3/>
</TYPSCHDetailsStruc>
</TYPSCHRecordSet>
</MT_TYPSCH>

Hi Mario,
ok here is my requirement.
We get ONE IDoc in which several items are listed. These have one field <NO> which can have the values 1,2 and 3. Depending on this value the items should be collected and written to different files on FTP.
My approach is that i divide all the items in mapping in different Message Types. This MT should be routet to different business services which has one CC to write on FTP.
To get the items with e.g. <NO>1</NO> i took condition in reciever determination using xpath. ((/ZBC21/IDOC/ZBC21/NO = 1).
So depending on the mapping everything runs - in my point of view but the different messages are not routed to the different services to write them to different files.
Source
<ZBC0>
<IDOC BEGIN="">
<EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="">
<ZBC0 SEGMENT=""> 0...9999
<NO>1</NO>
<TYPE>1B20-6</TYPE>
<SPEC>152J</SPEC>
</ZBC0>
<ZBC0 SEGMENT="1">
<NO>2</NO>
<TYPE>1B20-6</TYPE>
<SPEC>152J</SPEC>
</IDOC>
</ZBC0>
target:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<MT_TYPSCH> 1..1
<TYPSCHRecordSet> 1..1
<TYPSCHDetailsStruc> 1..unbounded
<FELD1/> {represents content of <NO>}
<FELD2/>
<FELD3/>
</TYPSCHDetailsStruc>
</TYPSCHRecordSet>
</MT_TYPSCH>
The output should be files with content of items depending on field <NO>.
file1.txt (all items with <NO>1</NO>)
file2.txt
file3.txt
I hope i made it clearer!
br

When i start firefox double clicking the short cut icon, it runs in the processes but the user interface window does not comes up in the screen,please help.

in my laptop,i generally use windows xp, due to some problems i repaired the window, after some days without any notice the above problem starts. but internet explorer 8 shows up with a perfect window, but a bit slow in every respect compared to firefox. above all if i start the window in safe mode firefox runs perfectly.please help, i ve tried every possible way(installing different anti-viruses, acessing through set program and defaults).

A possible cause is security software (firewall) that blocks or restricts Firefox or the plugin-container process without informing you, possibly after detecting changes (update) to the Firefox program.
Remove all rules for Firefox from the permissions list in the firewall and let your firewall ask again for permission to get full unrestricted access to internet for Firefox and the plugin-container process.
See:
* [[Server not found]]
* [[Firewalls]]
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser_will_not_start_up

FPGA interface dynamic does not connect with FPGA interface based Vi

Hi all,
I have to use a vi (using an FPGA interface in in its inpouts), in an other Vi (which call directly FPGA Dynamic ( when i opened FPGA reference and configure with an FPGA vi or a bitfile the FPAGA interface take dynamic by default)
but i cannot connect the two vi by they FPGA references (plz see picture).
did anyone had had this problem before and what is the solution for that?
Regards,
SASA
Attachments:
553465_96.jpg ‏55 KB

Hi GerdW,
Thank you.
it works with your solution, but it create another problem with another vi (see picture).
Regards,
SASA
Attachments:
synamic-simple-Interface-problem.jpg ‏47 KB

VBAI 2011 "Inspection Interface Configuration" does not support LV 2011 vi?

I am trying to use LV2011 vi for VBAI2011 Inspection interface, but the error message appears:
"This step only supports LabVIEW 2020 VIs or earlier. To fix this problem, save the VI to a previous version of LabVIEW".
I tried to save my 2011 VI to 2010 VI, and then tried again. But a blank, new windows popped up, with title "VBAI_Temp_Inspection_Interface.vi", and it hang there forever.
Please help.

Could you post your LV 2011 VI so I can see what might be the problem. VBAI should offer to save the VI to a previous version for you, but there are some limitations with this (i.e. LabVIEW doesn't allow VIs from toolkits to be saved for a previous version). For this to have a chance of working though, you need to make sure you have bundled all your dependnecies into an LLB as mentioned in the Context Help for the Run LabVIEW step.
Thanks,
Brad

Interface mapping Object does not exist in runtime cache

I am getting the following error after importing IR into our test system (PI7.0 SP10).
Interface mapping Object ID 19C3AC9D13B03787AEEB85169D0B6900 Software Component 8C51B2209F3C11DB94CEEB180DDF0074 does not exist in runtime cache Exception of class CX_XMS_SYSERR_MAPPING
You want to execute interface mapping Object ID 19C3AC9D13B03787AEEB85169D0B6900 Software Component 8C51B2209F3C11DB94CEEB180DDF0074 .     However,the data of this interface mapping is missing in the runtime cache. Activate the interface mapping in the Integration Repository.
I cannot change the mapping and reactivate - as this cannot be changed.
I have run SXI_Cache, Cleared SLD caches on IR and ID and run cacherefresh=full, but no luck!
The mapping is there and I can test it in the IR.
Any thoughts?

I had this problem today, maybe this helps someone when searching about this (at least this is the first hit at a very big search engine when searching for interface mapping does not exist...)
I have a RFC => PI => File scenario. I was aware that this would need to be asynchronous so I set up the message interface (service interface for PI > 7.0) as asynchronous inbound. This is the file receiver part of the interface.
Hints on the error: Audit Log in message details of RWB showed a line like this: RFC adapter received sRFC for ZMY_FM from <sender SID>/<sender client>. Attempting to send message synchronously. This of course could not work as file is asynchronous by default.
Bottom line however was, to make the call of the sender RFC asynchronous by using "in background task" like so:
CALL FUNCTION 'ZMY_FM'
   IN BACKGROUND TASK
   DESTINATION 'PI_DEST'
   EXPORTING
     t_file = lt_file.
COMMIT WORK.
Don't forget the commit work here.
Hope this helps.
Cheers
Jens

BPE_adapter The process does not support the given synchronous interface

We are using PI 7.0 Sp 14 .
Old dev box needed to be upgrade with 64 bit hardware. We did a fresh installation and done all the technical configuraiton. Imported SLD , IR,ID , Runtime value mapping . All scenario working fine after migration except one particular scenari which involves SOAP Web service .
Our scenario is Extern system send SOAP call to PI - BPM_SYNC_ASYnc_process --> BPM Proxy_send
this BPM proxy_send to ECC R/eceiver at R/3
We are getting the following error after migraiton. Please help
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="BPE_ADAPTER">SYNCHONOUS_MESSAGE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>The process does not support the given synchronous interface or does not support synchronous messages</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>

Is there any other Configuration to be done at the Abap side part from BPE_XI_customising (Automatic customising) done as part of the post installation steps .
Wondering any other configuration needs to be done at the ABAP side (as BPE is running on the ABAp stack) to resolve this.
Thanks

Error in sender file adapter: source directory does not exist

Hi,
The PI system is 7.11
I've created sender file adapter with following details:
Transport Protocol : File System
Source directory: /interfaces/In
I checked in AL11 that this path really exists and it does. (I can even see the .txt file that should be processed.)
But still i get in Communication Channel Monitoring the following error:
"Configured Source directory "/interfaces/In" does not exist.
(i also tried to give the source directory as "interfaces/In" and as "//interfaces/In" but still the same error.
Any suggestions as to what is wrong?
kr
Robert

Actually, Need to use forward slash (/) to separate directory names in accordance with the Java specification.
But wanted to try if that works..
Also check directory name , path again as this is case sensitive...
--Divyesh

Why IVisualElementContainer does not have "getChildren" method defined?

Hi all,
In Flex 3 SDK Container.as has method getChildren() and rawChildren property typed as IChildList.
But In Flex 4 the interface IVisualElementContainer does not have a definition for getChildren() > thus neither SkinnableContainer nor Group have this method defined.
Was this decision made deliberately to simplify the interface API?
I find it convenient to have "getChildren" method implemented inside Group and SkinnableContainer, for example this can be useful if I want to access all visual childs of those containers to pass them along to some manager class or to dynamically set some common property of all childs ( e.g visibility).

MX had a concept of two sets of children: regular children and raw children. One component could have two children lists.
Spark simplifies this concept because of the skin. Now there's really only one set of children. Because of this IVisualElementContainer acts like IChildList and has a very similar API. You should be able to use IVisualElementContainer as you would IChildList before.
Note that in places where we do have more than one-set of children, we don't expose them on the main object, but require you to dig down in to the separate object (the skin or the controlBarGroup for example).
Hope that helps,
Ryan

Broadcast/multicast counters does not increase on vlan interface

Hi,
on a Cat6500 we try to monitor interface packet statistics via snmp, in detail we want to get information about the relation between unicast, multicast and broadcast packet counter.
What we found out is that while on physical l2 interfaces all counters (ifHCInUcastPkts, ifHCInMulticastPkts, fHCInBroadcastPkts, ifHCOutUcastPkts, ifHCOutMulticastPkts, ifHCOutBroadcastPkts) are filled, on vlan interfaces multicast in/out and broadcast out packets stay zero whole the time. We use arp, hsrp, ospf and other well know broadcast and multicast based protocols.
Does anybody know why this counters do not increase?
Attached you find an excel sheet which shows an example of interface counter vs. vlan counter.
many thanks in advance,
Thorsten Steffen

Hi jon,
belown the result of sh sdm prefer,so need i a licence ip service to apply the route-maap on the interface vlan,or just entrer the config"sdm prefer routing" and reboot the switch?
SWBB0#sh sdm prefer
The current template is "desktop default" template.
The selected template optimizes the resources in
the switch to support this level of features for
8 routed interfaces and 1024 VLANs.
number of unicast mac addresses:                  6K
number of IPv4 IGMP groups + multicast routes:    1K
number of IPv4 unicast routes:                    8K
    number of directly-connected IPv4 hosts:        6K
    number of indirect IPv4 routes:                 2K
number of IPv6 multicast groups:                  64
number of directly-connected IPv6 addresses:      74
number of indirect IPv6 unicast routes:           32
number of IPv4 policy based routing aces:         0
number of IPv4/MAC qos aces:                      0.5K
number of IPv4/MAC security aces:                 0.875k
number of IPv6 policy based routing aces:         0
number of IPv6 qos aces:                          0
number of IPv6 security aces:                     60

Interface vlan does not up!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for