Intergration SocialMiner 8.5(5) with UCCX 9.0.2

Hello!
I want to integrate UCCX 9.0.2 with SocialMiner 8.5(5). In "UCCX->Subsystems->Chat->SocialMiner Configuration" I try to set parameters for integration with Social Miner, but I get only "SocialMiner Status was red". I wrote HostName for SocialMiner unstead IP Address. My DNS works well and I don't have any problems with my network. After I filled gapes in "SocialMiner Configuration", I got message "SocialMiner has been configured and the data has been saved successfully.", but SocialMiner Status(Chat Feed, Campaign and Notification) is only red cross, although "CCX Chat Feed" was added in "SocialMiner->Configuration->Feeds" and "CCX Chat Campaign" was also added in "SocialMiner->Configuration->Campaign". Which typical problems I can have when I try to integrate SocialMIner and UCCX? How can I fix my problem?

Mikhail, that chat is a standalone (Socialminer) service. I suggest to upgrade to Socialminer 9.0.1, to follow UCCX compatibility matrix guide, and if the issue persists, then it would be easier to work in the resolution from there.
A few days ago I configure UCCX 9.0.2 intregrated with Socialminer 9.0.1 without a problem, that is why I suggest you to do the same.
Please rate helpful answers.
HTH
Gabriel.

Similar Messages

Facing issue in integration WFM 8.5.1 with UCCX 8.0.2

Hi
I am trying to integrate WFM with UCCX but the integration is not successfll and WFM is not importing user from UCCX
In the log file i am getting following error:
[oocAgent] 11-22-2011 10:25:12 PM Handling server IPCC_Express
[oocAgent] 11-22-2011 10:25:12 PM Selecting platform: CCX 8.0+
[oocAgent] 11-22-2011 10:25:12 PM Collecting from 11-22-2011 10:24:12 PM to 11-22-2011 10:25:12 PM
[oocAgent] 11-22-2011 10:25:12 PM Opening Connection on acdDbMain
[oocAgent] 11-22-2011 10:25:13 PM Error while executing
[oocAgent] 11-22-2011 10:25:13 PM Error code -761S1000: [Informix][Informix ODBC Driver][Informix]INFORMIXSERVER does not match either DBSERVERNAME or DBSERVERALIASES. SQL Code: -1
[oocAgent] 11-22-2011 10:25:12 PM Handling server IPCC_Express
[oocAgent] 11-22-2011 10:25:12 PM Selecting platform: CCX 8.0+
[oocAgent] 11-22-2011 10:25:12 PM Collecting from 11-22-2011 10:24:12 PM to 11-22-2011 10:25:12 PM
[oocAgent] 11-22-2011 10:25:12 PM Opening Connection on acdDbMain
[oocAgent] 11-22-2011 10:25:13 PM Error while executing
[oocAgent] 11-22-2011 10:25:13 PM Error code -761S1000: [Informix][Informix ODBC Driver][Informix]INFORMIXSERVER does not match either DBSERVERNAME or DBSERVERALIASES. SQL Code: -1
Hope someone in the forum has a solution for that
Regards
Rupam

It looks like server name does not match. IBM call it the server name. In the Microsoft world you would call it the instance name.
Login to the CLI on CCX and do a "show status" make a note of the host name. Using the following to convert the host name to the server name. If you have a HA CCX then each server will have its own server name.
Enter the instance name of the primary Unified CCX
database. When typing the database instance name,
use the following guidelines:
■ Convert all uppercase characters to lowercase
characters
■ Replace all hyphens with underscores
■ If the host name starts with a number, add the
prefix i
■ Append _uccx to complete the instance name
For example, if your host name is 80-ABC, your instance
name will be i80_abc_uccx.
Graham

Licensing Issue Quality Management 9.0 with UCCX 8.5

Hi guys,
The UCCX compatibility matrix, Cisco WFO System config Guide plus QM 9.0 installation guide all state QM9.0 is compatible with UCCX 8.5(SU3).
We have ordered QM9.0 licenses using part number
L-CCX-90-QM-L-K9=:L-CCX-90-QM-L-K9= : CCX 9.0 Quality Manager Server , 10 Seats LICENSE ONLY
I am unable to add these licenses to our UCCX server as I am getting:
Error: The Cisco Unified CCX Quality Manager Seat feature (2nd line) of xxxxx.lic has unsupported version number (9.0)
Has anyone installed QM9.0 with UCCX 8.5 and if so what licenses did you have to purchase?
Thanks!

I have not done this yet, I was looking into getting the license to do same you are doing. Thanks for the heads up. I will wait to see outcome of your attempt.
My main drive to go to 9.x is to get IE9 32 bit support with the latest 9.x SR as I have a handful of supervisors who have Windows 7 and using it to play back recordings, etc and I'm tired of the compatibility issues and time spent on their PCs to keep it running after they do other updates, etc. Was hoping 9.x with the IE9 and 32 bit support would help with those headaches.

Does scripts of UCCX 9.0.2 will work with UCCX 10.5

Currently we are having UCCX 9.0.2-10000-71 installed on MCS server. We are planning to migrate on BE7K UCS server with version uccx 10.5.
1. Does scripts of UCCX 9.0.2 will work with UCCX 10.5
2. How i can restore historical data from 9.0.2 uccx to 10.5 uccx as new server will be having different IP address hence we cannot restore the backup. We need to create all configuration manually. Also uccx 9.0 was supporting Historical Reproting but 10.5 supports CUIC, so there is any way we can restore the reporting data so that we can pull old reports using CUIC as well.
Thanks & Regards
Netplace

Hi
Sounds like you have a lot to learn and should leave the upgrade to someone who knows the products.
1. Yes, typically they work, but testing this will be part of your upgrade process. The script may contain anything from basic steps (that will work) to complex stuff or embedded Java.
2. You would not restore the data. It's not possible. What you would do normally would be to change the IP address of the existing system either before or after the upgrade. CUIC and HRC are difference interfaces to the same DB, so it doesn't matter.
Regards
Aaron

Java Class (Compiled with JDK6_u12) that works with UCCX 9.0.2, don´t work with UCCX 10.5

I have a Java Class (Compiled with JDK6_u12) that works with UCCX 9.0.2, after upgrade it don´t work with UCCX 10.5
I get the error message: "Failed to access the WSDL at: https://www.brightnavigator.se/brightservice/brightservice.asmx?WSDL. It failed with: Got java.lang.RuntimeException: Unexpected error: java.security.InvalidAlgorithmParameterException: the trustAnchors parameter must be non-empty while opening stream from https://www.brightnavigator.se/brightservice/brightservice.asmx?WSDL.; nested exception is: javax.xml.ws.WebServiceException: Failed to access the WSDL at: https://www.brightnavigator.se/brightservice/brightservice.asmx?WSDL. It failed with: Got java.lang.RuntimeException: Unexpected error: java.security.InvalidAlgorithmParameterException: the trustAnchors parameter must be non-empty while opening stream from https://www.brightnavigator.se/brightservice/brightservice.asmx?WSDL. (line: 1, col: 47)
Does anyone know about this ?

Did you ever find a resolution to this issue? I have a similar issue after upgrading from 7 to 10.5. I have loaded all provided certificates to the tomcat-trust store, restarted Tomcat Services and still get the same error
Thanks

Barge is not working with UCCX 7.1

Dear EXPERTS,
We have CCM 7.1.5 with UCCX 7.1, on CSD the barge is not working, whenever supervisor iniate the barge, his phone start ringing and customer put on hold, he can have conversation with agent only when he is answering his phone.
I believe whenever supervisor iniate the barge/press the barge button, his phone should automatically answer the call and he can have conference with agent and customer.
The agent phone is 7961 and supervisor phone is 9951.
Kindly advise on it.
BR
Irfan

Hi UCCX 7.1 is not compatible with 9951 phone,

National do-not-call-list with UCCX

Hi,
Is it possible to program the UCCX to block automatically number appears in a "do not call list" from the contact campaign list ? I have found some way do to that with ICM but not with UCCX.
Thanks,

No, the documentation specifically states, that you need to do this before uploading the contacts.

Web callback with UCCX

What is needed to offer web callbacks with UCCX? Premium Edition? Outbound?....
Thanks

What you are looking for is an inbound contact workflow, and not an outbound one. The outbound subsystem/campaigns are too limited to dynamically build outbound contact lists, and dynamically run on demand.
Technically, there are only two ways to trigger a script externally from an inbound perspective:
A phone call to the JTAPI trigger (CTI Route Point)
An HTTP GET or POST to the HTTP trigger (A URL)
With that said, only the HTTP trigger requires premium, the phonecall option works on all licensing models.
And with that said, placing a phone call into UCCX from anything other than a phone is very challenging. Your talking CTI toolkit programming stuff right there. I wouldn't touch it if I didn't have to. It could be costly. For illustrative purposes, let's just say it would cost X.
The HTTP triggered application is easier to deploy, but requires premium. And if you upgrade your licensing to premium, you pay for the ports (2 ports for every 1 agent you buy). As an example, say you have 50 Agents today, and you're using 300 ports on your server. Recall that you don't pay for standard or enhanced ports. You would need to purchase 50 enhance to premium upgrade licenses and 100 full premium licenses in order to keep your port count the same. That could be cost Y. But don't forget that you woulnd't just count the HTTP trigger benefit in the cost, you also get the email subsystem, databse subsystem, custom java capabilities (if from STD to PRE), etc.
If cost X is less than cost Y, then you might take the challenge of placing a JTAPI phone call to your trigger programmatically from the web server.
If cost Y is less then cost X, then you might upgrade to premium and go the HTTP trigger route.
If cost is not an issue, then I would suggest the premium upgrade route. It's easier, and you enhance your system more than just the HTTP trigger thing.
I really do hope that helps you understand your options. How you would go about building all of this is a different subject. I would first start with understanding HTTP triggers, then managing Contacts within a script, and finally the ACD subsystem. With just those three things you could implement what you are looking for. I should also mention that you do not need the UCCX platform to handle the UI on the web page. Instead, have your web developers perform something called an AJAX call to your http trigger, where you simply return a pass or fail, so they can tell the user if it worked or not.
Good luck and happy researching.
Anthony Holloway
Please use the star ratings to help drive great content to the top of searches.

CAD with UCCX and DN assigned to multiple phones

We are running CAD 6.6 with UCCX 7.0. Our agents do not connect through the back of the phone. Their CAD is runnin separately. Most of our agents have no problem controlling their desk phones from the CAD. However, a few users have multiple devices assigned to their end user. I have thus far been unable to determine how CAD determines which line instance (or phone) to control when making and receiving calls.
Example: Can anyone tell me how CAD determines which phone to take off hook when a user makes a call from CAD?
Example: Some users have a phone and a device profile. When they use CAD to make a call it takes their phone off-hook. If they then login to another phone using extension mobility CAD will take that phone off hook when making a new call, but not the original desk phone where the line permanently exists. Can anyone explain this behavior?
Thanks,
Preston

Hi
Duplicate lines are tricky with any CTI app.
If you read the release notes for UCCX, you will see that shared lines and duplicated line appearances are unsupported configurations. The IPCC extension property of the user account is what determines which line is controlled, and this isn't device specific.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_7_0/release/notes/uccx701rn.pdf
If your users need to be mobile, give them a single EM profile.
If they don't want EM, give them a static phone.
Regards
Aaron
Please rate helpful posts..

MediaSense CUBE recording with UCCX

Customer has MediaSense installed with UCCX currently and is somewhat frustrated that when an agent puts a call on hold, MediaSense breaks the recording and starts a new one once the call resumes. I know, I know...that's the phone, not MediaSense, but that's not the question here.
Customer wants to "fix" this, and understands that forking the media from a CUBE would allow them to have a single recording. Customer uses MGCP gateways currently.
In looking at the problem, I'm trying to figure out exactly WHERE to place a CUBE in this. Call comes in from PSTN via MGCP gateway. I'm thinking that we could set a route pattern to CUBE (which might even be co resident on the MGCP gateway...I think it should have sufficient horsepower here), and then hairpin the call back to CUCM using a different CSS on the inbound side. The call would then hit UCCX and then the agent's DN.
I drew this all out in Visio, and I *think* it should work. I'm going to end up labbing the whole thing up to verify it but was trying to figure out if there is any obvious problem that will make this not a workable solution.
Screen shot of the visio drawing are attached. Looking for some critical thinking here to help confirm or poke holes in this idea.
TIA
Cliff

In my lab I send a block of number such as 31xx to the CUBE via a route pattern. In the CUBE I swap the leading 3 to a 2 so the number becomes 21xx and then send back to CUCM. 21xx can then be your CCX route point or a phone. As long as you can get the call to cross the CUBE as a SIP to SIP call you can fork the media.
This will record the full call from your CCX welcome message via the MoH to the agent.
You should also think about recording outbound calls and where in the call flow the CUBE would fit. Most agents do not present their extension when they dial out. So if the call crosses the CUBE presenting the Contact Centre number that is the number you would see in the recording and it is difficult to identify the agent making the call.
Graham

DTMF not working with UCCX

Hi
We have noticed that DTMF is not working with UCCX,
Call flow ->
PSTN (SIP)-> CUBE - (SIP)-> CUCM - > UCCX
UCCX DTMF is working with IP Phones which are registered with CUCM, But not working with PSTN incoming calls, also we have Unity Connection, for this DTMF is working with PSTN incoming calls,
Please help to troubleshoot this issue,
Rgds
$

What this boils down to is that the CTI Ports do not support RFC2833, only out of band over the CTI QBE protocol. This means that CUCM must "see" the DTMF packets. If CUBE offers KPML in the call SDP, CUCM will automatically request this and translate from the SIP packet into a CTI event. If CUBE is only offering RFC2833, CUCM would need to invoke an MTP on the call to intercept the RTP packets containing the DTMF event.
If this isn't working the most likely reason is that there is no MTP for CUCM to invoke, or the MTP doesn't support RFC2833 DTMF interop. The best way out of this problem is to adjust the CUCM-facing VOIP dial-peer to include both capabilities: 'dtmf-relay rtp-nte sip-kpml' CUBE, assuming it's doing media flow-through, will do the heavy lifting for CUCM. If you set the DTMF Method on the CUCM-side SIP trunk, CUCM will essentially invoke an MTP for *every* call, in most cases needlessly; that's a great way to introduce problems and break things such as faxing.
Please remember to rate helpful responses and identify helpful or correct answers.

CUCM 8x compatibility with UCCX 7x

Quick Question: Is CUCM 8x compatible with UCCX 7x. It does NOT appear so looking at the UCCX compatibility matrix:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_compatibility/matrix/crscomtx.pdf
Currently have CUCM 7.1.3.32900-4 with UCCX 7.0(1)SR05_Build504 - Moving to CUCM 8x (probably 8.1) 1st Qtr 2011. Want to maintain UCCX on 7x. Is this possible/compatible ? Can someone confirm and if you have experience any gotchas to share is greatly appreciate.

Hi
Thats correct UCCX 7.x is not compatible with CUCM 8.x version.
UCCX talks to CUCM with the help of JTAPI protocol, Every major release of CUCM has a different version of JTAPI which UCCX downloads from CUCM when JTAPI sync is performed.
Unfortunately the JTAPI version of CUCM 8.x is not tested with UCCX 7.x version thus its not present in compatability matrix. UCCX 8.x which is out supports CUCM 8.x Also UCCX 7.0(2) which will be coming out later this year or early next year might have the support for 8.x - not sure on that though
Hope this helps
Anuj

Issue with UCCX IDSEngine Attention alert

Hi ,
Good Day .
Need some help on the alert for the IDSEngine Attention . Recently we have received the alert intermittently . I could not find any related information on it . Dbreplication is good , services are in services . Is anyone know what did it mean ? . UCCX version 9.0.2.11001-24
Date: Jan 15 21:55:36
Machine Name: xxxx
Severity: Error
App ID: Cisco Database Layer Monitor
Message: : 0: xxx.internal.xxx.com.au: Jan 15 2015 10:55:36.889 UTC : %UC_-3-UNKNOWN_ALARM:IDSEngineAttention: %[class_id=xxx_xxxx_02_ccm9_0_2_11001_24-7][class_msg=Dynamic Server Initialization failure.][specific_msg= lization failure.:WARNING! Physical Log size 20000 is too small. Physical Log overflows may occur during peak activity][ClusterID=StandAloneCluster][NodeID=xxx-xxxx-02]:
Thanks.

Hi,
Thanks . Our system have 2 disk . log_dbs  , uccx_sbspace and uccx_ersb are those which is less than 5% . I would think that all this allocation are system created ? I google out and look like log_dbs with 3% free are common . Any place to increase it or we could supress the syslog on this ?
Command Line Interface is starting up, please wait ...
   Welcome to the Platform Command Line Interface
VMware Installation:
        2 vCPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz
        Disk 1: 146GB
        Disk 2: 146GB
        4096 Mbytes RAM
admin:show uccx dbserver disk page
SNO. DATABASE NAME      TOTAL SIZE (MB) USED SIZE (MB) FREE SIZE (MB) PERCENT FREE
1    rootdbs                     358.4           59.6          298.8          83%
2    log_dbs                     317.4          307.3           10.1           3%
3    db_cra                      512.0           73.0          439.0          85%
4    db_hist                   34508.6         8154.9        26353.8          76%
5    db_cra_repository            10.2            3.9            6.4          62%
6    db_frascal                  512.0           62.3          449.7          87%
7    temp_uccx                  1572.9            8.2         1564.7          99%
8    uccx_sbspace               3145.7         2988.1          157.6           5%
9    uccx_er                     204.8            5.6          199.2          97%
10   uccx_ersb                  1572.9         1494.1           78.8           5%
11   sadmin                      102.4            4.8           97.6          95%
CHUNK NO. OFFSET TOTAL SIZE (MB) FREE SIZE (MB) FILENAME
1         0               358.4          298.8 /var/opt/cisco/uccx/db/root_uccx_dbs
2         0               317.4           10.1 /var/opt/cisco/uccx/db/log_dbs
3         0               512.0          439.0 /var/opt/cisco/uccx/db/db_cra_dbs
4         0             34508.6        26353.8 /common/var-uccx/dbc/db_hist_dbs
5         0                10.2            6.4 /var/opt/cisco/uccx/db/db_cra_repository_dbs
6         0               512.0          449.7 /var/opt/cisco/uccx/db/db_frascal_dbs
7         0              1572.9         1564.7 /common/var-uccx/dbc/temp_uccx_dbs
8         0              3145.7          157.6 /var/opt/cisco/uccx/db/uccx_sbspace_dbs
9         0               204.8          199.2 /common/var-uccx/dbc/uccx_er_dbs
10        0              1572.9           78.8 /common/var-uccx/dbc/uccx_ersb_dbs
11        0               102.4           97.6 /var/opt/cisco/uccx/db/sadmin_dbs

Licensing problem with UCCX 7, agent not able to login at all

Hi there,
We have UCCX 7 server and CUCM 7.
Problem is that we the agents are not able to login and they are getting maximum license error although not all licenses are used.
We get the following errors when trying to login:
1. "Maximum number of licenses reached. Please notify your System Administrator".
2. When we click "Ok" for the error above, we get the following "A licensing error has occured. Please try again in five minutes. If the problem persists, please see your log file or System Administrator for details.".
I checked the licensing service and it is working fine.
The log for the licensing service is not indicating anything, it shows only the last time there was a failure in this service (this was 6 months ago after a restart). It was working fine until yesterday.
I tried to disable the "IPCC Extension" under the User Configuration in the CUCM and enable it again, but did not solve the problem and got the same error.
It is worth to mention that when I disabled the "IPCC Extension", before I enabled it again, I tried to login using CAD but I got the same exact error.
Any help will be really appreciate, thanks a lot.

Hi
Open a command prompt on your UCCX server (not client) and go to this directory:
C:\Program Files\Cisco\Desktop\bin
Then run:
showlicenseusage.exe
THis will show you the IP addresses that are currently consuming licenses. You can check these PCs to see if they are still logged in - if they are, that's your problem. If they aren't, then you may have a problem with the LRM service or something.
If it has logins listed that aren't really logged in, you might be able to restart the License and Resource Manager service from Control Center to resolve it temporarily.
Aaron
Please rate helpful posts..

Way of External Database Integration with UCCX

Hi
I want to know what are the way of UCCX integration with External Database(Mobile Operator, Banking, Insurance).I only know about DBwrite and DBGet. is there any way out(http, https,SOAP)? They dont want to give me direct access to there Databases.
Sultan Al Arif

One way to do this would be to use the Get URL Document step to request an XML file from a web server.
Upon receiving this request the web server would then retrieve the required data via SQL (fairly easy to do using ASP.NET and IIS), format it in an XML page and return it to your script.
The script would then use Get XML Document Data steps to parse the XML file for the required data.
The organisations that operate the databases with which you want to integrate may have some concerns about the security of this though as the data will not be encrypted in transit.

Intergration SocialMiner 8.5(5) with UCCX 9.0.2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for