Internal Activity partial confirmation with breaks

How to a maintain a actvity confirmation with breaks, say for eaxample one internal activty is completed as shown below :
i) completed 20% - from 01.07.09 to 05.07.09 - 5 days
ii) completed 30% - from 10.07.09 to 20.07.09 - 11 days
iii) Completed last 40% - from 25.07.09 to 10.08.09 - 17 days
i.e No part of the activity is executed in between the dates 06.07.09 to 09.07.09 & from 21.07.09 to 24.07.09. it is tarted on 01.07.09 and finally completed on 10.08.09 - (Actually it is taken 33 days) - not 40 days

Hi Chittaranjan Mohanty ,
Your requirement has conflict with the Intepration of term 'duration' and 'work' in SAP standard.
The duration is not take the break into account. E.g. an activity has duration 20 days (4 weeks) and the work = 4 hours, may the person only do 1 hour for this activity.
For the progress it is does not matter, if therre is a break in the time frame or not. The important is how many works are done till now. The time are keeping going.
The flag 'exact break' for the scheduling has other usage, has nothing to do with your case,  see consulting note 151551.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo

Similar Messages

  • Internal Activity Confirmation without a workcenter

    Hi all,
    I have situation where I am not using any workcenters, and i want to confirm an internal activity.
    How should i proceed.

    Dear Sir,
    I am facing the same proble. I want my internal activity to confirm without Work Center for 1 WBS elemt and should confirm with work center for another WBS.
    When we do w/o work center then error comes as states by Rohan :
    *Work is confirmed - maintain the work center*
    *Message no. RU210*
    *Diagnosis*
    *You have confirmed a value for work but no work center.*
    *System Response*
    *Processing stopped.*
    *Procedure*
    *Enter the key for the work center where you have had the completion*
    So please guide
    Umesh

  • Please Help: Activity Units allocated in Full during Partial Confirmation

    Dear All
    I am facing a problem and need your help. When going for partial confirmation of a process order the system is allocating the full Costing Activity units. For example the process order is of 1000 units production and for 1000 unit production we have defined following controlling activities with certain rations
    Setup
    Machine
    Labor
    Factory Overhead
    The unit of these activities are totally allocated even if i am going for a partial confirmation or i finally confirmed the process order even for 800 units. The unit and cost of these activities is charged on the basis of 1000 initially planned units.
    Please help me urgently as we are having severe problems in Costing of process orders
    Regards
    Bilal Athar

    Dear Siva
    I have checked n OPK4 last tab page (Services --> Tick on Propose)
    Its already ticked
    And we are processing the confirmation through COR6N and here system is not displaying the activities automatically
    Tell me what to do
    Regards
    Bilal Athar

  • Want Automatic scheduling in case I partially confirm the activity

    Hi Experts,
    I have one network with two activities having FS relationship with duration for ex.10 & 20Days.
    Activity 1:  ES = 01-01-2009  & EF = 10-01-2009  (Date -Month - Year format)
    Activity 2:  ES = 11-01-2009  & EF = 30-01-2009
    I havedone the following settings:
    1) Adjust Basic Dates
    2) Automatic Scheduling
    3) In confirmation parameters - Propose dates
    Now I had done the partial confirmation of activity 1 with actual start 03-01-2009 & Actual Finish 11-01-2009  & forcast duration 2 days
    Now when i save the NW or Project but system dose not do the automatic scheduling Earliest dates remain same .For this I have to do manually
    Can some one help so that the system schedule automatically & the result would be as
    Activity 1:  ES = 03-01-2009  & EF = 13-01-2009
    Activity 2:  ES = 14-01-2009  & EF = 03-02-2009
    Regards,
    Deependra

    Hi
    The ES and EF dates are the dates for planning only. Scheduling is done for the planning purpose only.
    Once you do the actual / partial confirmation of the activity, the difference between your planned visa-vis your actual dates will help you to understand your planned credentials.
    Regards,
    Uddhab

  • CM01 not updating upon partial confirmation of an activity in order

    Hello PP Angels,
    I am looking for an explanation for this.
    When a production order is partially confirmed, (using CO11N),
    for an activity -- say labor time.
    (and do not confirm any quantity )
    subsequently, on checking the CM01 Standard Overview,
    I find the report unchanged, under the requirements column.
    (for the week concerned)
    But the same ( capacity requirements) gets reduced,
    for the relevant week,
    on doing a partial confirmation of production order,
    for a value in the "Yield" field in C011N.
    Is this the standard SAP behavior ?
    I am in ECC6.
    Thanks in advance !

    Thanks for the reply !
    I have tried it
    It does work,
    there is a change in the cap reqmnt column in CM01
    But the value is not as expected, as explained below.
    CM01 shows initial cap req as 33.5H
    After confirming the production order
    for 10 minutes (0.1667 H) of set up time
    I would expect the Cap Req Column to have a value of 33.5 H - 0.1667 H  = 33.3 H
    but CM01 displays only 0.17 H
    ( I have created this scenario such that CM01 reflects only one production order.
    So there is no mix up of data. )
    Can we see how the Cap Req column in CM01 is being calculated, (the details)
    I did double click the cap Req  value in CM01
    and it shows the relevant production order,
    but no further details can be viewed pertaining to the calculations.
    Thanks in advance !!!

  • Java.security.ProviderException: Internal error: lose session with active o

    Our ap server is crashing unexpectedly after running for a period of time. The system is Solaris 10 and Sun App Server 8.1 EE.
    The stack trace is:
    java.security.ProviderException: Internal error: close session with active objects
         sun.security.pkcs11.SessionManager.closeSession(SessionManager.java:197)
         sun.security.pkcs11.SessionManager.access$000(SessionManager.java:48)
         sun.security.pkcs11.SessionManager$Pool.release(SessionManager.java:253)
         sun.security.pkcs11.SessionManager.releaseSession(SessionManager.java:155)
         sun.security.pkcs11.Token.releaseSession(Token.java:245)
         sun.security.pkcs11.P11SecureRandom.engineNextBytes(P11SecureRandom.java:98)
         java.security.SecureRandom.nextBytes(SecureRandom.java:413)
         java.security.SecureRandom.next(SecureRandom.java:435)
         java.util.Random.nextInt(Random.java:188)
         com.sun.enterprise.util.uuid.UuidUtil.getNextInt(UuidUtil.java:142)
         com.sun.enterprise.util.uuid.UuidUtil.getNextRandomString(UuidUtil.java:146)
         com.sun.enterprise.util.uuid.UuidUtil.generateUuid(UuidUtil.java:50)
         com.sun.enterprise.util.uuid.UuidGeneratorImpl.generateUuid(UuidGeneratorImpl.java:25)
         org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase.generateSessionId(ManagerBase.java:993)
         org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase.createSession(ManagerBase.java:796)
         org.apache.catalina.session.StandardManager.createSession(StandardManager.java:292)
         org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteRequest.doGetSession(CoyoteRequest.java:2365)
         org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteRequest.getSession(CoyoteRequest.java:2202)
         org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteRequestFacade.getSession(CoyoteRequestFacade.java:838)
         javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequestWrapper.getSession(HttpServletRequestWrapper.java:265)
         com.localmatters.mvc.web.filter.AptasServletRequestWrapper.getSession(AptasServletRequestWrapper.java:184)
         com.localmatters.mvc.web.filter.AptasServletRequestWrapper.getSession(AptasServletRequestWrapper.java:170)
         com.aptas.etosha.web.handler.ExceptionResolver.getModelAndView(ExceptionResolver.java:76)
         org.springframework.web.servlet.handler.SimpleMappingExceptionResolver.resolveException(SimpleMappingExceptionResolver.java:174)
         com.aptas.etosha.web.handler.ExceptionResolver.resolveException(ExceptionResolver.java:96)
         org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.processHandlerException(DispatcherServlet.java:915)
         org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.doDispatch(DispatcherServlet.java:739)
         org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.doService(DispatcherServlet.java:663)
         org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.processRequest(FrameworkServlet.java:394)
         org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.doGet(FrameworkServlet.java:348)
         javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:747)
         javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:860)
         com.aptas.etosha.filters.InterceptorFilter.doFilter(InterceptorFilter.java:56)
         org.springframework.web.filter.DelegatingFilterProxy.doFilter(DelegatingFilterProxy.java:137)
         com.localmatters.mvc.web.filter.AbstractSpiderFilter.doFilter(AbstractSpiderFilter.java:94)
         org.springframework.web.filter.DelegatingFilterProxy.doFilter(DelegatingFilterProxy.java:137)
         com.localmatters.mvc.web.filter.EtoshaFilter.doFilter(EtoshaFilter.java:107)
    Any help most welcome
    Thanks
    Mikebros

    This issue seems like either a JDK bug or a JVM bug. Do you see any hs_err_pidxxxx.txt files created when appserver gets crashed? If so this is a JVM bug. You could try to upgrade your appserver's jdk to the latest version - 1.5.0_09 and/or ask for help in Java security related forum.

  • Close Project with partially confirmed network

    Hello,
    Is there a config setting which sometimes allows users to close a project with a network only partially confirmed ?
    Seems this is happening occasionally instead of the system enforcing the network be finally confirmed.
    Thanks,
    Dave

    Hi,
    His requirement  "Is there a config setting which sometimes allows users to close a project with a network only partially confirmed ?"
    it seems he want to close project with partialy confirmations. anyway he can use one of those available options.
    Thanks.
    regards,
    Sam L.
    Edited by: sam Lesha on Mar 23, 2011 6:14 AM

  • Internal error: close session with active objects

    Please help on this error msg :
    Internal error: close session with active objects
    this happend during the decryption.

    Please help on this error msg :
    Internal error: close session with active objects
    this happend during the decryption.You have an error on line 42 of your decryption method.

  • POC calculations of internal activity and service activities

    Hi,
    I need some help regarding POC.
    In the scenario, I am using two activities----Internal and service.
    The internal Activity is used only for scheduling and confirmation of activities. There is a work center attached to it, but there is no cost attached to it.
    The service activity is only related to cost.
    Now, I want to calculate the POC for internal activity similar to the MSP i.e, POC calculated at the activity level will role up to give the POC at the WBS level ( this POC will  be related to the POC as per the confirmation of the work that is the actual % of completion).
    To calculate the EV only the cost from the service activity will work. i.e, the actual cost which is coming from the RA Bill (ML81n) and the planned cost from the services in the service activity. So this POC will be different from the POC calculate in the internal activity confirmation.
    How to map both the scenarios in the same project ?
    Kindly furnish some idea.
    Regards,
    A. Bose

    Hi Abhra,
    You can use both activity types if required but I would recommed you to look up on the three types of activities so that you are able to choose the best option that fits your business requirement:
    1) Internal
    2) External
    3) Service
    You can use confirmations for both service as well as internal activities. This will help you with your POC calculation as the values will be aggregated to the WBS level. I tried to inquire from you which EV method you are using because that may assist you in determining the POC of activities (either service or internal) based on specific requirements.
    Now for EV to work you need to plan cost at the activity level for fair reflection (please note that this is also aggregated at the WBS level therefore if you do not plan cost at activity level, you will however get some estimated value at the WBS) of earned value. Based on your statements, I assume that EV is being calculated for the service activity correctly (as it has planned and probably actual cost) but not for the internal activity. I'm afraid without planned and actual cost, EV cannot be calculated. Have you tried using cost from the work center (which is assigned to a cost center)? You may use activity types in the confirmations as well.
    Please let me know if this is what you were looking for.
    Regards,
    Syed Ammar Zaheer

  • Partial confirmation of production order

    Hi,
    My requirement is that when i partially confirm production order system should calculate the activity time(machine time) propotionately based on actual confirmed qty.
    What is actually happening is that system is proposing the machine time based on full operation qty.
    I will explain the case with following example:
    Total Order qty - 20
    Now when i do CO11N the system proposes full operation qty of 20 & also the machine time 20 hrs(based on data given in routing)
    Now i when do partial confirmation of 5 units the machine time proposed is still 20hrs.
    This is impacting my costing report( as it should consider 5 hrs instead of 20 hrs)
    One more thing i want to clarify is that during confirmation we can change the machine time but requirement is that machine time should be in proportion to the confirmed qty(This is to reduce the confirmation effort)
    I hope things are clear to you.
    regards,
    Mohit Goyal

    Hi Goyal
    I suppose you are in SAP version 4.6c & above.
    you try in TCODE :OPK0
    This is the single screen entry for confirmation.
    Select the profile you are using & in the tab Defaults
    go to section default values & select "IMMEDIATE PROPOSAL"
    in both "quantities & services"
    It will definitely work.
    YMREDDY

  • Scheduling and partial confirmation

    Dear all
    i have created a project, released......
    now i am confirming the activities................my question is, when i am partially confirming the activities,
    ex: duration of activity id 10 days, today when i am confirming the activity with 50% progress, its not showing the actual start date in the activity as well as in the project planning board.
    if i am confirming 100%, then its showing the actual start as well as actual finsih .................
    Question2: ex: if the duration of the activity is 10days, and if i have started the actvity today and completed 50%, will the system show the other 50% completion in one day.........and project the completion of the project to be completed by tomorrow??? or will the system shows the other 50% completion in 9 days.....
    10 days actvity ....
    50% completed in one day, will it project the other 50% completion in 1 days, or shows as 9 days??????
    hope so my question is clear.
    Regards
    surya

    Hi Surya Pampala,
    Question No-1
    While partially confirming the activity, you have to enter the Actual start data also on the confirmation screen along with percentage. this will be immediatly reflected in actual dates in network activity also and will be displayed in cj20n and cj2b as well.
    Question No-2
    As per the activity planning 10 days required for 100 % completing the activity. as per the execution, 50% work is completed in 1 day. If you want system should calculate the remaining time required to complete the activity you have to reschedule ( if you achieve planned duration based on the work planned for a work centre in the activity) the activity. If you have planned only days with out capacity requirements in the activity, you can enter forcast date of completion while confirming 50% for that activity.
    Hope this will clear you.....for any queries plz revert back !!
    regards,
    Hari

  • Partial Confirmation not working through Backorder Processing in GATP

    Dear SAP Folks,
    We are having issue with our Backorder Processing in APO.
    During backorder processing we have seen (in BOP Spool) orders are getting picked for
    processing but despite availability of Allocations and inventory, orders are remaining unconfirmed which could have been partially confirmed. 
    Order which can be partially confirmed, BOP doesnt do partial confirmation. For Example - If SO is for 100 pieces and
    can be confirmed for only 60 pieces, ideally BOP should confirmed 60, but it doesnt.
    But same sales order can be confirmed by doing manual online ATP Check in Sales Order.
    BOP only confirms the orders when it can be fully confirmed, not partial confirmation thru BOP.
    This is very strange, ideally BOP should confirm those orders, but its not doing it.
    Please help.
    Thanks
    Satish

    Dear SAP Experts,
    We tried the suggested solution to OVZJ setting = 'E'. This soulution is not working properly - results are inconsistent. Meaning with these  setting BOP confirmed orders partially, with the rerun of same BOP job on same orders it didnt confirm the orders partially, orders were kept unchanged. We tried this activity multiple times, but results are inconsistent.
    But online ATP check can always confirms those orders partially, without any issues there.
    Also please provide details about impact of this change for OVZJ setting= 'E', to any other processes in ERP system.
    Please help
    Thanks
    Satish
    Edited by: SatishW on Mar 17, 2010 10:05 PM

  • No price could be determined for internal activity LABOUR 0000005006

    No price could be determined for internal activity LABOUR 0000005006
    Costs of cost element 7500001 cannot be assigned to any cost component
    Message no. CK578
    Diagnosis
    In preliminary order costing or a confirmation, costs for cost element 7500001 were calculated that could not be assigned to any cost component of cost component structure 01.
    These costs are from the usage of an internal activity (activity type SETUP) for cost center WORKCENTER.
    System Response
    The costs will be treated as fully relevant to stock valuation, and debit the order and credit the cost center with the full amount when a confirmation is entered.
    Procedure
    If necessary, assign cost element 7500001 to a cost component in cost component structure 01.

    Dear,
    You need to check this calling your cost component structure using OKTZ.Your Cost Element must be assigned to one of the components.
    Please closed your previous thread also by assigning relevant points.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Difference partially confirmed activities via CN22 and CN25

    Dear,
    Apparantly there seems to be a difference in the SAP logics in partially confirming activities:
    when we partially confirm an activity using transaction CN22, the activity is not planned anymore..
    however we we partially confirm an activity using transaction CN25, the activit is still planned (status = DSPT)
    What is the standard SAP logic around this ? Why is their a difference? Should and can the difference be corrected?
    rgds,
    bert

    Hi Bert
    Can you clarify - what are you trying to do? DPST is a system status when you try to transfer the dates from forecast to Basic.
    Wheras using CN22 you can confirm the activity - means whatever been planned -trying to convert into actuals of the work performed. The same can be done in CN25 but with one network activity. Collective (work)confirmation can be done using CN27.
    Regards
    PP

  • IW48 - Error NO PRICE COULD BE DETERMINED FOR INTERNAL ACTIVITY

    While i confirm the work order by useing IW48 t-code that showing an Error i.e. "NO PRICE COULD BE DETERMINED FOR INTERNAL ACTIVITY 1422 0000004230"
    The Mesagge No is CK466
    I would like to know how to change the message type from error to warning as I want to keep the price of activity type with no value (zero price).
    Thank you
    Edited by: carlos stoffel lemos on May 19, 2010 10:58 AM

    hi Tesjag
    Thank you for your input.
    I have read the program that you have mentioned and in fact fyi the message type can be maintained in table T100C via transaction code OBA5. hte standard defaults as an error as you have mentioned but this can be changed on the tarnsaction that i have mentioned.
    thank you

Maybe you are looking for