Internal Order - AUC Issue

Hi,
I have created one internal order for AUC purpose.When i call Asset Under Construction option from the Internal order screen (KO02) it is taking me to AS01 asset creation screen.But here they system is taking the AUC asset class 4001 by default instead of my own AUC asset class.
why it is calling AUC asset class 4001 instead of my AUC asset class? Kindly help me
Thanks
Kishore

Hi ,
Check the Properties with 4001 with your asset class.
In OBOA-
Account Determination should be 40000 or Copy of that.
Status of AUC should be select for- Investment Measure
Regards,
Sridhar Sha

Similar Messages

Issues against Internal Order- AUC

Dear Gurus,
My client require the following when the goods issued against Internal Order(AUC) (MB1A, Movement Type: 261)
The system has to post following entry
Consumption a/c Dr
To Assets Under Construction a/c Cr
How can we do that please help me.
Reagrds
Sreenivas.P

Hi
Why does the client wants to credit AUC a/c. It should normally be Inventory account.
Normal scenario is that the costs gets debited to IO and on settling the IO it sits in the AUC asset. Then the AUC settlement is carried out thru AIAB & AIBU to real asset
Thank You,

Internal Order - AUC - Asset Settlement

Hi All,
Please can anyone help me with the below issue on settlement (AUC):
Only 95% of the cost is settling to Asset from internal order. But I need 100% settlement. What settings needs to be changed.. Pls advice..
Will be helpful if solution is adviced asap.
Thanks,
Vinay

Dear Vinay,
Please check your settlement rule----
be sure that it must be 100%. (KO02)
If it is 100% then check in maintain allocation structure
(img-controlling-IO-actual posting-settlement-maintain allocation structure)
now select allocation structure (which is assign to your settlement profile) and double click on assignment and then source--- in this see whether all cost relating to IO is maintain or not. and then Double click os settlement cost element....here you see that by cost element field should be blanck.
come to the settlement profile (img-controlling-IO-actual posting-settlement-settlement profile)----
here you check that settlement should be full and also check the indicators....
Assign points if it helps you..........
Rgds,
Madhuri Panda
Edited by: madhuri panda on May 22, 2008 8:53 AM

Internal order AUC

Hi
When i am trying to save the internal order ,for which i have assigned the investment profile ,system is giving below error
Object concerned: New order .
The object is a capital investment measure, since it has the investment profile 000009, in which the indicator "manage asset under construction" is set. In addition, it is no longer at system status EROF (opened). In this case, there has to be an asset under construction for the object.
System Response
You can create the missing asset under construction.
The object cannot be saved in its current state.
Where i can set this EROF in the status profile.
Thanks
Lily

Hi Lily !
The internal order you have created belongs to an order type which is attached to a model order. The model order is assigned an asset class which is managed on the Investment measure.
In this case, you have to create an asset under construction before releasing the Internal order. Other wise, the system will not allow you to save the internal order.
When you settle the internal order periodically, the values will automatically flow to the AUC asset.
For more details you can check the configuration on Investment management.
Inthis case, create the AUC asset with the asset class ( which is defined as the AUC investment measure)
Thanks
Siva

Internal Order - AUC not saving

Hi
I have created an internal order where the inthernal order type is linked to a model order. However when I go to Extras > Asset Under Construction, the AUC has been created but when I go to save the created AUC, the save icon is not active and it does not allow me to save the AUC
Please let me know as to why the save icon is not getting enable and how to save the created AUC
Thanks

Hi,
AUC will be created automatically once you saves Internal Order. It will be disable mode at the time of creating AUC from IO.
After creaton of IO check AUC no. from IO itself.
Thanks,
Padmaja

KO22 internal order budget issue

Hello All,
while making changes for internal order budget with transaction code KO22 the system shows a error as u201CItem order xxxxxx budget exceededu201D & for some orders u2018Item order xxxxxx budget almost exhaustedu201D & also referring to a budget for year 2006,2007,2008 . & The system doesn't accept those changes .
Another strange thing is that the system allows the same changes for few items (maybe 4, 5, or six that time it will get saved that time it will not give error) ,
but trying to do 10-15 changes , the system shows the warning message as stated above
If anyone has encountered this strange issue please share your inputs
Thanks & regards,
Prashant

Dear,
When making changes to budget then make sure you are increasing it not decreasing....
When you decrease the budget then system will check tolerance defined............and display warning or error....
For e.g in tolerance you have defined that system should display warning at 95% absorption of budget and Error at 100%.
You have set budget 10000 INR for the Internal Order. So it means at 9500 INR system will issue warning and at 10000 INR or more system will give error.
If posted amount to order is 9000 INR so you can noway reduce budget less than 9000 INR because it is 100% and system will give error.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

Internal Orders - AuC

Experts,
We have a requirement, where in the creation of an Internal Order for a certain Order Type, would create an AuC also automatically.
Any ways we can achieve this task.
All answers/inputs/thoughts would be duly appreciated and rewarded with points.
Thanks,
Nandita

Does that mean the line on settlement rule for that IO is automatically generated? Here are the steps I am doing:
1. KO01 - Create IO
2. Extras - AUC
3. Go Back and save the IO
AUC and IO are getting created but not the settlement rule. Is there some setting that I need to do get this rule automatically generated?
N
All answers will be rewarded

Internal Order status issue Error - Message Class X short dump

Hi All Experts,
I am creating internal order with CRTD status. However when I am trying to post transaction through MIRO , I am getting ABAP short dump mseeage class X. So I changed the CRTD to REL manually and able to solve the error.
But could any expert help me what is the logic behind this CRTD , REL, LKD etc ?
Since I am reading help.sap.com also as well but simple word help will be appreciable !
One more can we,
1 ) Create Internal Order with the REL status directly ?
2 ) If YES where configuration needs to be done
3 ) Will it hamper any business process ?
Exprts guidance will be appreciable.
Regards,
Sharvari Joshi.

Hi,
All Masters,
Eli - Thank you for your answers.
Lawrence - Thank you for simple word that is what I was looking for.
Can anybody tell me how can we create IO directly in LKD status ? Or it is manual acitivity by clicking on Set / Rest button and then check LKD and save. I tried in KOT2_OPA but not no any option found. If any experts can guide for the following configuration would be great.
1 ) Is it possible to create IO with LKD status directly ?
2 ) Where that configuration needs to be done ?
3 ) What is significance of JEST Table relating to Internal Order ?
Exprerts help would be great !
Regards,
Sharvari Joshi.
Edited by: Sharvari Joshi on Dec 3, 2010 11:52 AM

Internal Order Settlement Issue

HI,
I have posted some entries in Postage internal orders. But when i tried to settle that in KO88, it is showing the below message.
No Transaction Data Posted Since Last Settlement
Actually once the client executed KO8G transaction for all orders. At that time 2 Orders was not settled. Now When i tried to settle them in KO88, It is giving the above message.
Why it is not getting settled? How to fix this error. Kindly help me
Thanks
Kishore

Dear,
Because these order are alreaddy settled. No balance on these order please check in KKBC_ORD. You can just settle additional amounts posted since last settlement.
For deatils refer this link,
Order Settlement
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Internal order authorization issue

Dear Sir/Madam
We want to restrict the authorization for posting entries into internal order.
Our users are authorised to pass entry through T code FB01- where they use the gl account which is internal order mandatory. they are putting the real internal order and passing the entry.
We want to restrict the users authorisation for using the real order. It has to be restricted to only limited users.
Kindly help us how can we control this authorisation
Thanks & Regards
Prashant P.Zinge

Hi Prashant,
Here is my suggestion:
1. Create a basic set with GS01 for user group who are allowed to post to internal order. Also, create basic set for internal order also.
2. Now, in validation check for system-user name and syste-tcode. User name should be in user name set and tcode should be FB01.
If every thing goes well allow user to post the transaction otherwise give an error message.
This is just a draft, details you need to check while doing these activities.
Please let me know if it helps!!
Regards,

Internal Order Related Issue

Hi Gurus,
We are having a requirement wherein we need to capture the Actual and Planned amount(In Internal Order) for a order group.
After doing a short R&D on this, we came to know that the transaction code S_ALR_87012993 (Which gives a detailed report of Actual and Planned for a particular order group along with all the cost elements) contains the necessary details...
Does COSP Table contains the Actual vs Planned data of a order group? if that is the case, how can we get that.
Is there any Function Modules to capture the details?
Waiting for your replies...

Hi,
I don't know if there is any suitable FM but you can use the following approach to write your own. You can run SQL trace (transaction ST01) for report S_ALR_87012993. This will give you a list of all SQL queries used in this report. Usually, it's not that hard to figure out how to combine data returned by SQL queries to get wanted result.
Cheers

Internal Order Budget Issue

Hello,
I have one of the scenerio related to Internal order
My Budget is planned in KO22 as follows.
2012 1000 INR
2013 1500 INR
I created PR of Rs 1300 with delivery date as 15.01.2013. Hence after Pr creation the commitment will go and seat in year 2013.
But if i did GR against same PR/PO in year 2012 then system should give error as per configeration that budget amount for 2012 is exceede.
But instead of this i am able to do GR and avaiable amount in report shows negative amount.
I have done all config related to this, and working fine for all other nornal scenerios. So is anyone have faced this problem. so please provide some solution for this.
Reg,
Harry

Hi Harry
As per standard system design goods receipts and service entries
are not subject to availability control checks - see note 46209.
You can overcome this restriction, however, by means of a user exit
as described in note 696362.
br, Guido

Internal Order Settlement Issue (KO88)

Hi,
While doing KO88 to settle the internal order, the full amount of asset is not getting capitalised. My allocation structure and the settlement rule are correct.
For Eg. Asset Value = INR 1000000
            Down Payment = INR 200000
However, while doing KO88, the system should capitalise entire INR 1000000, but it capitalising only INR 800000.
the first line item shows                                 INR 1000000
the second line item shows                            INR 200000- (this amount is hitting some primary cost element configured in           the (OKEP Down payment - default cost element assignment) screen
the net amount (that will be capitalised =       INR 800000
can anybody assist me on this.........

Hi,
you can settle using "PER" settlement rule doing it period by period. Just key in the actual posting period in the field "posting period" in ko88.
Example: you are missing settlements from period 002/2009 to 009/2009, actual period is 011/2009. So you settle period 002/2009 with "PER" in posting period 011/2009. Aftre this had happened, settle 003/2009 to posting period 011/2009, and so on...
Best regards, Christian

Internal Order Closing Issue

Hi,
While closing IO 300000, I am getting the following error messages..........
There is still a purchase order commitment for ORD 300000
There are still open down payments for ORD 300000
There are still open down payments for ORD 300000
Message no. KO020
Diagnosis
There are still open down payments or down payment requests for order ORD 300000.
System Response
Order ORD 300000 cannot be deleted.
Procedure
You must first clear all open down payments or down payment requests for order ORD 300000.
You can then delete the order.
Kindly assist...

Hi,
Please, refer to note 599689.
Regards,
Eli

Internal Order for AUC Asset not getting created Automatically

As per SAP Standard , when I create an AUC Internal Order (KO01), and save , AUC asset is gets created automatically ted via AS01 and stores the AUC Asset in Internal Order settlement rule.
However when tried with the client Im not able to create, AUC is not getting automatically created and stored in Int Order Settlement rule.
In config I have added investment profile to Ord Type and in OAOA ( AUC Asset class setting , Investment profile is also checked)
Kindly let me have your inputs to fix the issue
Advance Thanks
Sanjai

Hi,
In order to create AUC asset automatically by the system, you need to create an investment profile in OITA.
Then assign this investment profile in the Internal order master data created through KO01 in the Investments tab.
There is no option of assigning the Investment profile in the Order type.
And in OAOA that is Asset class, select the radio button investment measure.
You can default the Asset class of AUC in the investment profile or leave it blank so that same can be filled when system prompts for AUC creation.
You cant see the AUC asset in the settlement rule once Investment order is created, but only after settlement of the balances to the AUC u can see.
Thanks & Regards,
Ravi Kumar

Internal Order - AUC Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for