Internal Order Defaults

Hi,
For each company code I have created different Internal Order types. I want to assign default company code in Internal order when it will be created for that particular company code.
E.g Three internal order types say ZZ01, ZZ02 and ZZ03 for three company codes say 1000, 2000, 3000 respectively.
Now when I create a order in type ZZ01, system should default 1000 as a company code in the order created. Also the order should be Statistical one
How to do this?
Regards,
Makrand

Hi,
To make order statistical by default, go to the definition of the order type and in the 'Field Selection' put 'Mandatory' flag for Statistical field. For company codes, I don't think it would be possible to default a company code. What you can do is to make validation via user-exit EXIT_SAPLRKIO_001 to verify that the company code defined is the one you want.
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

Default Internal order and cost center

Hi Experts,
i am uploading one file into sap and here i am giving GL accounts cost centers and WBS elements.
once i have done with upload.when i am checking in BSEG its showing one internal order and one default cost center with internal order.
i can not understand how its finding internal order and default cost cente(which diffetrent from those cost centers i have mentioned in excel).
please help me to find.
thanks,
Vani

HI,
Thanks for your reply.
i have checked OKB9 and KA03 but there is no default assignment.
checked also OBBH and OKC9 but no subtitution and i can't post manually now.
is there any option.
Waiting for your reply.
Thanks,
Vani

Defaulting to Internal Orders to Cost Assignment?

The SRM application is currently defaulting to Internal Orders for Cost Assignment. This is despite the fact that in the configuration, we have removed Internal Orders as active.
Any help with this will be gratly appreciated
Cheers
Brent

Robin
When I make this change and then try to raise a order through the catalog. the connection between the catalog times out. Seems to be looking for somthing? any idea.
Thanks for your help so far
Brent

Make cost center default for an internal order

Hi friends,
I want to make the cost center default for an internal order type. Can you please tell me how can i achieve that.
Regards,
Wasim.

Hi Atif,
thanks for your valuable reply but i am having different cost element depending on what is ordered. Is there anyway we can achieve this.
Regards,
Wasim.

Default internal order for each vendor

Hi
I am creating employee as a vendor in FK01. Each vendor is created as internal order for doing employeewise budget check. So when i book any expenses for vendor, i want that internal order should automatically flow on the basis of vendor.
So is there any way from where i can default internal order on the basis of vendor.
Edited by: Deepak Agrawal on Jun 9, 2011 5:05 PM

Hi
The only way to do the same is through Substitution rule by using an user exit. You need to create a Z table and maintain the mapping of vendor to IO. There after in GGB1, write a substitution rule for the node, complete document
Check if Vendor Account =X
Substitute using user exit
In the user exit call up the z table.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

How to set Internal Order to default REL status at creation KO01 stage ?

Dear all experts,
Good Morning !
I have requirement where all Internal Order's need to created at default REL status ? How can be this achieved ?
Expert guidance will be appreciated on this !
Regards,
Sharvari Joshi.

Dear,
SPRO>IMGControlling>Internal Orders>Order Master Data>Status Management> Define Status Profile
Create your own Status Profile, in T-Code KOT2_OPA assign the Status Profile and check the check Box Release Immediately
Br,Vivek

Default Results Analysis Key in Internal Order Master Data

Hi Expert,
I would like to default specific Results Analysis Key in Internal Order Master Data.
Please advice is the any configuration can perform that?
Results Analysis Key is under Period-End Closing tab (Internal Order Master Data)
Thanks
regards,
ng chong chuan

HI
1. Go to T code KOM1 > Order Type would $$
2. CReate an Order and maintain default values in it like Comp code, etc and also the RA key
3. Now, maintain this model order in your Order Type in KOT2_OPA
4. Transport this customizing request across to all clients
BR,Ajay M

Internal order not defaulting

Hey Guys,
we are using internal orders as capital investment measures. The internal order has to be assigned to the capital investment measure inorder for the order to be budgetted. In one of my systems(4.6) the order automatically is update in the capital investment measure( IM12)
but in 4.0 i am having to manually assign the internal order in IM12. Does anyone know what could be missing?
please advice

I doubt if we have any standard functionality for automatically assigning IO to IM position.
You can assign IO's program positions in two places: either in master data maintenance of IO (on the Investments tab page) or from master data maintenance of the program position.
But we have this automatic assignment for Maintenance Orders.
Regards
Sreenivas

Segment derivation when posting invoice on internal order

Dear colleagues,
I have configured the New General Ledger in SAP ECC 5.0, with profit center and segment as splitting characteristics. Document splitting and segment derivation are working fine for almost all scenarios, but not for all scenarios.
When a post a vendor invoice with FB60 to only a cost center document splitting and segment derivation are working correctly: the segment is derived from the profit center (which is assigned to the cost center in the master data of the cost center) and I can post the invoice.
However, when I post the vendor invoice to both a cost center and an internal order segment derivation does not work: I get the error message GLT2201 "The field Segment marked as balancing is not filled with any value in line item 001, even after document splitting."
The reason for this is that the posting on the cost center becomes statistical and the posting on the internal order is the actual posting. In the master data of the internal order I have not defined a profit center. Because of this the DUMMY profit center is assigned to the line item.
I have assigned all profit centers to a segment (in the profit center master data), except for the DUMMY profit center. I guess this is correct?? I can easily solve this issue by assigning the dummy profit center to some kind of dummy segment, but I don't think this is the correct solution.
A solution might be to enter a profit center in the master data of the internal order (segment can then be derived from this profit center). However, I prefer not to put a profit center in the master data of the internal order.
Does any of you have experience the same kind of problem? Can anybody give me some advice how to derive the segment correctly in the aboven mentioned posting? Did I do something wrong in the customizing?
Thanks for your help in advance!
Regards,
Koert

I have already found the solution myself. In the customizing you can define a default segment that will be used in case no segment can be derived in the posting.
IMG: Financial Accounting (New) --> General Ledger Accounting (New) --> Business Transactions --> Document Splitting --> Edit constants for nonassigned processes
Regards,
Koert

Issue While Executing the Internal Order in KO8G

Hi,
Whle executing the internal order in KO8G,I am getting the below error.
Complete Allocation Structure A1 and Message no. KD503
I have reversed/cancelled all the relevent Material documents related to that PO,even after i am getting the same error.
Error is as follows-
Complete allocation structure A1
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 414126 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure A1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element 414126 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure A1
Kindly advice me how to fix this error
Thanks
Supriya

Hi,
Thanks for your reply,I have added that cost element in allocation structure.Now i am getting one more error related to this even i have maintained Receiver type FXT and settlement cost element for that.Kindly help me on this.
Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA
Message no. KD506
Diagnosis
In allocation structure A1 (controlling area AFCO), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type FXA.
Procedure
Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure A1.
Thanks
Supriya

Internal Order for AUC Asset not getting created Automatically

As per SAP Standard , when I create an AUC Internal Order (KO01), and save , AUC asset is gets created automatically ted via AS01 and stores the AUC Asset in Internal Order settlement rule.
However when tried with the client Im not able to create, AUC is not getting automatically created and stored in Int Order Settlement rule.
In config I have added investment profile to Ord Type and in OAOA ( AUC Asset class setting , Investment profile is also checked)
Kindly let me have your inputs to fix the issue
Advance Thanks
Sanjai

Hi,
In order to create AUC asset automatically by the system, you need to create an investment profile in OITA.
Then assign this investment profile in the Internal order master data created through KO01 in the Investments tab.
There is no option of assigning the Investment profile in the Order type.
And in OAOA that is Asset class, select the radio button investment measure.
You can default the Asset class of AUC in the investment profile or leave it blank so that same can be filled when system prompts for AUC creation.
You cant see the AUC asset in the settlement rule once Investment order is created, but only after settlement of the balances to the AUC u can see.
Thanks & Regards,
Ravi Kumar

Settlement Rule for Internal Order

Hi All
I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
CAT - FXA
Settlement Receiver - Asset
% - 100
Settlement type - Full
Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
Message no. KD042
Diagnosis
You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

Hi:
        Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
"Symptom
    1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
    2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
Additional key words
KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
Cause and prerequisites
    1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
    You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
    The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
    2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
Solution
    1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
    2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
    Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
Regards

Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1 for Internal Order

Hi,
During Internal order settlement through KO88 I am getting this error as :
Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1
Diagnosis :
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters). Cost element 430500 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure K1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure :
    Possible solutions are as follows:
    o   If the posting under cost element 430500 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
    o   If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose
    "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure. If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
-   You can update allocation structure K1
The same configuration in Development Server there is no error but problem occurs in Quality server. Here the process is Internal Order creation - Creation of Reservation through MB21- Goods Issue against reservation through MB1A and finally settlement through KO88. During settlement this error occur. In configuration setting of allocation structure under Internal Order I have mentioned only revenue settlement (as per business) against assignments. Under source mentioned cost element group and under settlement cost elment Receiver Cat is "CTR" and tick "By Cost Element".
During MB1A i.e, goods issue accounting entry is generated as
81(Dr). 430500 Constimptuion Saprae and Stores
99(Cr). 310411 Inventory Machinery and Spare.
During settlement this debit figure should credit. But not allowiing to credit. Even in configuration under settlement cost element if I remove the tick of "By cost element" and mention secondary gl account whose cost element category is 21, still showing the same error in QA server. What may be the probabale solution ? Even if i remove allocation structure K1 from settlement profile 20 still same error exist. How this link gets during settlment inspite of removing allocation structure from settlement profile...
NB.. COPA is not implemented in our company. So PA structure should not arrise here....
Thanks & regards,
Samrat
Edited by: Samrat Roy on Aug 30, 2010 7:28 PM

Hi Samrat,
The issue is very simple.. Cost element 430500 is posted in your IO...
While settling you have 2 options... Either you can credit the original GL account 430500.. This happens when you tick "By Cost element".. This you have done already...
2nd option is not to tick "By Cost element" and assign a secondary cost ele category 21...
But for any of these options to work, you have to include GL 430500 in the "source"... The above 2 options apply only to those GL accounts which are mentioned in the "Source".... for rest of the GL accounts, system gives this error
Include 430500 in your "source" cost ele group.. Error will be resolved
Regards
Ajay M

Plant not populating in internal order

Hi All,
When we release a serivce order in CRM-Service, system is creating internal order. But it is not populating plant field in internal order. We have done the customizing of linking service organization to plant in CRM. Could you please let me know if there are some other configurations/enhancements to be done to derive plant field for internal order in ECC?
Regards
Suresh

If plant is maintained in Customer-Material Info Master & Customer Master, it will be defaulted in Sales Order.
But incase of Plant being maintained in Material Master, it is a common practice that it requires to be maintained in Sales Otder. If before entering the Material, Plant is maintained at Header level in sales Order, it will default in Line items, else it is required to be maintained for all Line Item.
This is Stansdard SAP.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka
Reward points if helpful.

Down payment against the Internal Order - for Capital Expenditure

Dear friends
I am getting an error while making down payment against the purchase order.
The order of my entries or steps are as follows:
Created one internal order for Capital WIP with budget and availability control activation.
Created one purchase order against a vendor with reference to the above Internal Order.
When I am making the down payment to the vendor through tcode:F-48, the system throwing an error
"Define Cost Elements for Down Payments".
Can any one please explain why this error is coming. When I checked in Internal orders, there is a TCode: OKEP for Define Default Cost Elements for Down Payments.
System is asking for cost element, but where as what ever the down payment we are making is nothing but advance which is current asset. Why system is asking for cost element?
Can any one give me the guidance how to handle the issue.
Thanks in Advance
Kiran Kumar A

The reason is when you want the down payment for AUC to be capitalised, then you would need to create cost element for Downpayments.
Normally as per design of SAP, down payment being a Balance Sheet Account (Current Asset as you rightly mentioned) doesnot need / accept an Cost object, as a special case since down payments for AUC needs to be capitalised and hence need to be carried to Controlling (Internal Order) by creating Cost Element for Downpayments.
Go ahead and create the cost element. That would resolve your issue.

Internal Order Defaults

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for