Internal order - restrict charges
How do I restrict the charges to an internal order ? I want to use a new order type but restrict its use by Responsible cost centers and or cost type ( ie only Investment management cost centers and non labor only ) Do not want the order open for any group to charge
Hi,
I cannot understand completely your requirement, but in order to restrict the usage of I/O, you can use validation via OKC7 transaction. If you are talking about restricting changes to the I/O itslef (master data), you can use user exit COOPA002.
Regards,
Eli
Similar Messages
-
Internal Order restriction with Plant during PR & PO
Hi All,
Generally we create budget based PO for each plant.
So we have defined internal order for each plant and we assigned those order during PR and PO creation
But my requirement is i want to restrict the Order with respective Plant
e.g If Order VX123 is created for plant A then Plant B can not use this order during PR and PO.
So can it be possible in std SAP or i will go for Enhancement?
Regards
PRDear Priyaranjan,
You can achieve above requirement by using the Badi, at the time of creation/change of PR and PO.
For PO use ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST
For PR use ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST
R,
Amala -
Internal order restriction for a particular GL posting
Hi SAP Experts,
I have created an internal order(statistical). I want to restrict the internal order postings for a particular GL accounts.
For example: Internal order 10001 can post only with GL 500003 and 500004 for Budget and Forecast (KPF6).
How is it possible.
Thanks,
SimarHi
I do not think that KA02 assignment alone would be a good option. You need to create a validation rule in GGB0 and assign the same in OB28 for your company codes. Also, you can look at the option of Substitution to populate the Internal Order field, when you use these GLs.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari -
Internal order restriction for a particular GL
Friends,
I have created an internal order(statistical). I want to restrict the internal order postings for a particular GL account. How is it possible.Hi,
In OKB9, you can assign a particular GL against that internal order. Otherwise write substitution for that.
Regards,
Kalpik Shah -
Restricting Cost Elements in Internal Orders
I am setting up new order types for our Marketing Department. I want to ensure the only costs charged there are Marketing Costs (ie a small range of Cost elements). I've put the range into the allocation structure, but that only seems to control settlement cost Element, and doesn't stop anything I don't want coming in to the order.
Is it possible to restrict postings coming in to a range of Cost elements? Ideally, this would stop the problem at source i.e. you can't raise a Purchase Order assigned to the Internal Order with a cost Element outside the restricted range?
Is this possible? If so, could you kindly point me in the right direction?Hi gbrandreth,
Allocation Structure, as you correctly understood, is only for Settlement transaction.
Pls try to use "Validations" for your requirement.
Srikanth Munnaluri
Edited by: Srikanth Munnaluri on Mar 18, 2009 2:57 PM -
PO, PR creation authorisation restriction based on Internal Order
Dear Forum
We have created a new Interla order type and want that only selective users can make a PO or PR in the Internal orders of that Intenal order type. Is there any way by which we can restrict creation of a PO or PR against an Internal Order, on the basis of Internal order number or internal order type
regards
Parag BhargavaHi,
look for an user exit (within enhancement project MEREQ001) when saving a PR / PO where you check SAP-user (maybe from a Z- table) against internal order type.
Best regards, Christian -
How to restrict Internal Order master data changes
Hi Experts,
We have internal orders that have no Functional Area assigned to it at the beginning of the month, but part way through the month a change is made to the master data and a Functional Area gets assigned to the internal order. When settlement is run at the end of the month, part of the internal order has a FA blank and part of the internal order has a FA of OPEX or G&A depending on what was assigned in the master data. This causes an issue because they don't offset.
Typically if no change was made to the master data during the month, all the transactions to the internal order with FA blank would offset and there would be no issues on settlement.
So, how can we control in the system that does not allow changes?.
Thanks
SanjuHi Sanju
If FA is not needed at all in the IO- hide that field in the order type screen layout.
Otherwise, restrict the authorization to someone who understands the criticality of it
Last resort, implement user exit which won't allow to add FA if transaction data exists. You can search for the exits as COOPA* in SMOD
Br. Ajay M -
How to charge OH on Internal order
Hi gurus,
can any body tell me what is the procedure to charge the Overhead on Internal Order? also want to know how can i charge OH through Internal order during product costing?
point will be rewarded...........
than'x
dhananjayHi,
In controlling, overhead will calculate in production order level, before creation of production orders, we have to create costing variant in that variant we define overhead for production and material and also how much % will calculate and that amount will credited in cost center.
Internal orders for short term jobs.
let me know other than this.
please assign points.
regards,
Gopi. -
IW32 - restriction or validation to accept only internal order from a plant
HI team!!
I´m needing your help
Im working with Tcode IW32 when creating a maintenance order and we got through Goto / Settlement rule we can assign any internal order number.
there is no restriction or validation to accept only internal order numbers from the corresponding plant, this condition may affect other entities
How can I limit it?
Thks & regards "In configuration, in settlement rule, restrict receiver other than internal order. In case if you want to have internal order as a receiver but restrict only some orders, you can do that using a user exit/badi at save.
example user exit -IWO10009 -
Restrict Entries in Internal Orders
Hi
We have a requirement wherin specific Internal orders should not be allowed to be posted through Financial Transactions ( i.e No entry of Primary Cost Element should be allow on those orders) only secondary cost elements should be allowed
How can i configure this requirement in the Internal Order
Please advise
Regards
AshkHello Ashk,
As a suggestion you can use a User Status for the specific orders that restricts certain business transactions being preformed, such as postings from FI.
See customizing transaction OK02 and its accompaning online help.
You'll find it under SPRO -> IMG -> Controlling -> Internal Orders -> Order master data -> status management.
Regards, Elaine -
Statistical Internal Orders - How can i charge to multiple cost centers
In the master data for the statistical internal orders, I am only able to enter one cost center in the 'Actual Posted Cctr' field. Is there a way to have multiple cost centers and the allocation % for each cost center (similar to the settlement rules on regular internal orders)?
thanks!Hiya,
OKB9 works by assigning multiple Cost Centres to the Company Code + GL combination. However, I don't believe OKB9 is your solution - for the simple reason that you wish to post the information to multiple CCtrs, along with posting it to this Statistical IO.
In my opinion, you may have to delete the Actual Cost Centre assignment and, at the time of document posting, assign the True CCtr as well as this IO, or look for a User Exit that will trigger flows to multiple CCtrs along with this IO.
The other option is to make this a real posting to this IO (change the IO from statistical to real), and then settle this cost to multiple CCtrs. As long as it stays statistical, you don't have the liberty of settling the cost.
Hope this helps.
Cheers. -
Block creation of new Internal Order Type
Hello,
We have several internal Orders types and we want to block the creation of new IO. Is there any way through customizing to do that?
I have considering to do it using an step in a validation but I think can be a better way.
Thanks,Hi,
Ravi is right, you can restrict through authorizations. To do that, you have to modify the role assigned to users that allow them to create internal orders of any type. Use the transaction SUIM, search the role by user or by transaction (KO01). Then, in the role, there is an entry that corresponds to Controlling (CO) -
> CO-OPA: General authorization object for internal orders (K_ORDER) -
>
Order Type (AUFART) : Select for example RA01
Internal order authorization (AUTHPHASE) :
Actions for CO-OM Authorizatio (CO_ACTION) : 0000 Master Data.
Cost Element (KSTAR) :
CO-OM Responsibility Area (RESPAREA) :
Usually a BASIS do the modification of the role.
Regards,
David Z. -
Internal order settlment to GL (primary cost)
Hi Friends,
I got and issue like that client wants to settle internal order (primary cost) to GL only, but do not wants to settle secondary cost to GL.
I maintain allocation structure for that where i include all the range of all primary and secondary element; and defined settlement rule in order master record for G/L. When i tried to settle it, it is also picking secondary cost element type-43 and settling to GL.
client wants to settle only primary cost to particular GL. I tried to restrict it by reducing range from source, but than while settlment system is not alllowing.
please let me know is there any restriction can be applied to settle secondary cost.
Thanks
Subodhhi..
I think you can try the following changes in your allocation structure to solve your problem :
01. Goto OKOA > set "can be settled Indicator "> donu2019t tick 100% validation.
02. Create Source structure (Exam:S1)with relevant and Not relevant assignments
And assign cost elements you want to settled to relevant and which you do not want to settle
assign to nonrelevant (you can define CE group also)
03 Goto OKOA > Set the Source structure (S1) into the field.
04 Goto order settlement rules set the source assignment u201Crelevantu201D and set settlement type u201CPERu201D.
Only cost element group you assigned as relevant will settled and other part will remain in the order. Subsequently you can repost the other part to other object as per your requirements.
kkumar -
Settlement of PM order over Internal order
In order to control revenue budget from being over run we have developed Internal orders in controlling with the combination of Cost Centre & GL Code. The internal order are statistical in nature.
We are facing the following problem:
1. In PM order (IW31) settlement rule is defined as following:
1.1 CAT "Order"
1.2 Settlement Receiver "3440-2360010 3440"
1.3 Amount 1000
1.4 Settlement Type is Full
2. The problem occurs when there are different internal orders
3. After we run settlement rule (KO88) it runs successfully.
4. KSB1 report shows that the amount is split among all the settlement receivers
5. Whereas requirement is that amount against a particular internal order should be charged to its GL account and cost centre only.Dear Sreenivas Kadiam,
I go to spro-----Plant Maintenance and Customer Service--Maintenance and Service Processing---Basic Settings----
General Order Settlement------Maintain Allocation Structures.
The following allocation structures are already defined:
A1 CO allocation structure
A2 No split
PM PM allocation structure
PR PARCO Allocation Structure
I could not find the (settlement cost elements setting should be 'BY COST ELEMENT' for receiver category ORD.)
Please advise
Regards
Aftab Ahmed Khan -
Internal Orders & settlement to Inventory Accounts(G/L Accounts)
Hello
Could anyone share his/her knowledge on the business processes that might be involved in the use of Internal Orders for small projects(minor costs) and then settling it to Inventory Accounts.
My Client uses Internal Orders to capture costs for small projects like Advertising campaign, Claim for warranty, House keeping charges etc.and once after all the charges are captured, they settle the Internal Orders to Inventory Accounts? (which is kind of confusing to me)
I know that Internal Orders are used to capture the costs for small projects but I am confused as to how are those costs settled to Inventory Accounts??
Is it possible to settle those small project costs to Inventory Accounts? If so what would be the business processes or postings that would need to be posted to Internal Orders(Ex: Goods Reciept or Inv Consumption)
I am preparing a Business process design document and I need to document this.
Could anyone please share their knowledge and explain this, It would be really helpful and will be really appreciated. I would be really generous in assigning points.
Thanks for your help!
SandeepHi Ashok,
Thank you for your reply.
The PCE does not have a default account assignment.
The reason for this settlement is because we want to move the charges onto a balance sheet account so they can be cross charged manually. The debits on the internal order are on a secondary CE as they came from an assessment out of a cost center.
The flow should be: CC assessment> IO> G/L
CC assessment to IO happens on a secondary
Debit sits on the IO on a secondary CE
We want the IO to settle to a balance sheet G/L
Maybe you are looking for
-
IPod will sync, but works slowly and eventually freezes
5th gen. black video ipod about 1.5 years old. use it daily, then one day i was shuffling and it froze. i reset using Menu & Center buttons, then got error message to restore w/ iTunes. restored w/ iTunes, tried to use. worked slowly and eventually f
-
Urgent help please, I made an file with the size 1024x768, then i made two folios, one for retina 2048x1536 and one for non retina 1024x768, i have alot of video content in it, everything works perfect on my retina ipad, but when i open it on ipad 2
-
My son has a k8n neo2 Platinum with a GF 6600, dual core 3800, 1 gig ram, IDE drives. The problem we are having is when installing software. Even with XP there were three files it could not read so we had to skip them. The games do the same thing, i
-
POST does not show up after the installation of RX2600XT-Diamond
Hi All, I just purchased my MSI RX2600XT-Diamond 256MB Diamond last week. It works like a charm; however, an annoying issue surfaced after I installed this video card on my computer. Ever since I updated the card with Catalyst 7.9, the video card WIL
-
I seriously don't know what to do, the screen says: "Your iPhone could not be activated because the activation server cannot be reached. Try connecting your phone to iTunes to activate it or try in a couple of minutes if this problem persists, contac