Internal order -  restrict charges

How do I restrict the charges to an internal order ?   I want to use a new order type but restrict its use by Responsible cost centers and or cost type ( ie  only Investment management cost centers  and non labor only )   Do not want the order  open for any group to charge

Hi,
I cannot understand completely your requirement, but in order to restrict the usage of I/O, you can use validation via OKC7 transaction. If you are talking about restricting changes to the I/O itslef (master data), you can use user exit COOPA002.
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

  • Internal Order restriction with Plant during PR & PO

    Hi All,
    Generally we create budget based PO for each plant.
    So we have defined internal order for each plant and we assigned those order during PR and PO creation
    But my requirement is i want to restrict the Order with respective Plant
    e.g If Order VX123 is created for plant A then Plant B can not use this order during PR and PO.
    So can it be possible in std SAP or i will go for Enhancement?
    Regards
    PR

    Dear Priyaranjan,
    You can achieve above requirement by using the Badi, at the time of creation/change of PR and PO.
    For PO use  ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST
    For PR   use ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST
    R,
    Amala

  • Internal order restriction for a particular GL posting

    Hi SAP Experts,
    I have created an internal order(statistical). I want to restrict the internal order postings for a particular GL accounts.
    For example: Internal order 10001 can post only with GL 500003 and 500004 for Budget and Forecast (KPF6).
    How is it possible.
    Thanks,
    Simar

    Hi
    I do not think that KA02 assignment alone would be a good option. You need to create a validation rule in GGB0 and assign the same in OB28 for your company codes. Also, you can look at the option of Substitution to populate the Internal Order field, when you use these GLs.
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari

  • Internal order restriction for a particular GL

    Friends,
    I have created an internal order(statistical).  I want to restrict the internal order postings for a particular GL account.  How is it possible.

    Hi,
    In OKB9, you can assign a particular GL against that internal order. Otherwise write substitution for that.
    Regards,
    Kalpik Shah

  • Restricting Cost Elements in Internal Orders

    I am setting up new order types for our Marketing Department. I want to ensure the only costs charged there are Marketing Costs (ie a small range of Cost elements). I've put the range into the allocation structure, but that only seems to control settlement cost Element, and doesn't stop anything I don't want coming in to the order.
    Is it possible to restrict postings coming in to a range of Cost elements? Ideally, this would stop the problem at source i.e. you can't raise a Purchase Order assigned to the Internal Order with a cost Element outside the restricted range?
    Is this possible? If so, could you kindly point me in the right direction?

    Hi gbrandreth,
    Allocation Structure, as you correctly understood, is only for Settlement transaction.
    Pls try to use "Validations" for your requirement.
    Srikanth Munnaluri
    Edited by: Srikanth Munnaluri on Mar 18, 2009 2:57 PM

  • PO, PR creation authorisation restriction based on Internal Order

    Dear Forum
    We have created a new Interla order type and want that only selective users can make a PO or PR in the Internal orders of that Intenal order type. Is there any way by which we can restrict creation of a PO or PR against an Internal Order, on the basis of Internal order number or internal order type
    regards
    Parag Bhargava

    Hi,
    look for an user exit (within enhancement project MEREQ001) when saving a PR / PO where you check SAP-user (maybe from a Z- table) against internal order type.
    Best regards, Christian

  • How to restrict Internal Order master data changes

    Hi Experts,
    We have internal orders that have no Functional Area assigned to it at the beginning of the month, but part way through the month a change is made to the master data and a Functional Area gets assigned to the internal order.  When settlement is run at the end of the month, part of the internal order has a FA blank and part of the internal order has a FA of OPEX or G&A depending on what was assigned in the master data.  This causes an issue because they don't offset.
    Typically if no change was made to the master data during the month, all the transactions to the internal order with FA blank would offset and there would be no issues on settlement.
    So, how can we control in the system that does not allow changes?.
    Thanks 
    Sanju

    Hi Sanju
    If FA is not needed at all in the IO- hide that field in the order type screen layout.
    Otherwise, restrict the authorization to someone who understands the criticality of it
    Last resort, implement user exit which won't allow to add FA if transaction data exists. You can search for the exits as COOPA* in SMOD
    Br. Ajay M

  • How to charge OH on Internal order

    Hi gurus,
    can any body tell me what is the procedure to charge the Overhead on Internal Order? also want to know how can i charge  OH through Internal order during product costing?
    point will be rewarded...........
    than'x
    dhananjay

    Hi,
    In controlling, overhead will calculate in production order level, before creation of production orders, we have to create costing variant in that variant we define overhead for production and material and also how much % will calculate and that amount will credited in cost center.
    Internal orders for short term jobs.
    let me know other than this.
    please assign points.
    regards,
    Gopi.

  • IW32 - restriction or validation to accept only internal order from a plant

    HI team!!
    I´m needing your help
    Im working with Tcode IW32 when creating a maintenance order and we got through Goto / Settlement rule we can assign any internal order number.
    there is no restriction or validation to accept only internal order numbers from the corresponding plant, this condition may affect other entities
    How can I limit it?
    Thks & regards "

    In configuration, in settlement rule, restrict receiver other than internal order. In case if you want to have internal order as a receiver but restrict only some orders, you can do that using a user exit/badi at save.
    example user exit -IWO10009

  • Restrict Entries in Internal Orders

    Hi
    We have a requirement wherin specific Internal orders should not be allowed to be posted through Financial Transactions ( i.e No entry of Primary Cost Element should be allow on those orders) only secondary cost elements should be allowed
    How can i configure this requirement in the Internal Order
    Please advise
    Regards
    Ashk

    Hello Ashk,
    As a suggestion you can use a User Status for the specific orders that restricts certain business transactions being preformed, such as postings from FI.
    See customizing transaction OK02 and its accompaning online help.
    You'll find it under SPRO -> IMG -> Controlling -> Internal Orders -> Order master data -> status management.
    Regards, Elaine

  • Statistical Internal Orders - How can i charge to multiple cost centers

    In the master data for the statistical internal orders, I am only able to enter one cost center in the 'Actual Posted Cctr' field.  Is there a way to have multiple cost centers and the allocation % for each cost center (similar to the settlement rules on regular internal orders)?
    thanks!

    Hiya,
    OKB9 works by assigning multiple Cost Centres to the Company Code + GL combination. However, I don't believe OKB9 is your solution - for the simple reason that you wish to post the information to multiple CCtrs, along with posting it to this Statistical IO.
    In my opinion, you may have to delete the Actual Cost Centre assignment and, at the time of document posting, assign the True CCtr as well as this IO, or look for a User Exit that will trigger flows to multiple CCtrs along with this IO.
    The other option is to make this a real posting to this IO (change the IO from statistical to real), and then settle this cost to multiple CCtrs. As long as it stays statistical, you don't have the liberty of settling the cost.
    Hope this helps.
    Cheers.

  • Block creation of new Internal Order Type

    Hello,
       We have several internal Orders types and we want to block the creation of new IO. Is there any way through customizing to do that?
       I have considering to do it using an step in a validation but I think can be a better way.
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    Ravi is right, you can restrict through authorizations. To do that, you have to modify the role assigned to users that allow them to create internal orders of any type. Use the transaction SUIM, search the role by user or by transaction (KO01). Then, in the role, there is an entry that corresponds to Controlling (CO) -
    > CO-OPA: General authorization object for internal orders (K_ORDER) -
    >
    Order Type  (AUFART)   : Select for example RA01
    Internal order authorization  (AUTHPHASE) :
    Actions for CO-OM Authorizatio (CO_ACTION) :  0000  Master Data.
    Cost Element  (KSTAR) :    
    CO-OM Responsibility Area  (RESPAREA) : 
    Usually a BASIS do the modification of the role.
    Regards,
    David Z.

  • Internal order settlment to GL (primary cost)

    Hi Friends,
    I got and issue like that client wants to settle internal order (primary cost) to GL only, but do not wants to settle secondary cost to GL.
    I maintain allocation structure for that where i include all the range of all primary and secondary element; and defined settlement rule in order master record for G/L. When i tried to settle it, it is also picking secondary cost element type-43 and settling to GL.
    client wants to settle only primary cost to particular GL. I tried to restrict it by reducing range from source, but than while settlment system is not alllowing.
    please let me know is there any restriction can be applied to settle secondary cost. 
    Thanks
    Subodh

    hi..
    I think you can try the following changes in your allocation structure to solve your problem :
    01.     Goto OKOA > set "can be settled Indicator "> donu2019t tick 100% validation.
    02.     Create Source structure (Exam:S1)with relevant and Not relevant assignments
                         And assign cost elements you want to settled to relevant and which you do not want to settle
                         assign to nonrelevant (you can define CE group also)
    03      Goto OKOA > Set the Source structure (S1) into the field.
    04        Goto order settlement rules set the source assignment u201Crelevantu201D  and set settlement type u201CPERu201D.
                   Only cost element group you assigned as relevant will settled and other part will remain in the order. Subsequently you can repost the other part to other object as per your requirements.
    kkumar

  • Settlement of PM order over Internal order

    In order to control revenue budget from being over run we have developed Internal orders in controlling with the combination of Cost Centre & GL Code. The internal order are statistical in nature.
    We are facing the following problem:
    1. In PM order (IW31) settlement rule is defined as following:
                      1.1     CAT "Order"
                      1.2     Settlement Receiver "3440-2360010  3440"
                      1.3     Amount 1000
                      1.4     Settlement Type is Full
    2. The problem occurs when there are different internal orders
    3. After we run settlement rule (KO88) it runs successfully.
    4. KSB1 report shows that the amount is split among all the settlement receivers
    5. Whereas requirement is that amount against a particular internal order should be charged to its GL account and cost centre only.

    Dear Sreenivas Kadiam,
    I go to spro-----Plant Maintenance and Customer Service--Maintenance and Service Processing---Basic Settings----
    General Order Settlement------Maintain Allocation Structures.
    The following allocation structures are already defined:
    A1     CO allocation structure
    A2     No split
    PM     PM allocation structure
    PR     PARCO Allocation Structure 
    I could not find the (settlement cost elements setting should be 'BY COST ELEMENT' for receiver category ORD.)
    Please advise
    Regards
    Aftab Ahmed Khan

  • Internal Orders & settlement to Inventory Accounts(G/L Accounts)

    Hello
           Could anyone share his/her knowledge on the business processes that might be involved in the use of Internal Orders for small projects(minor costs) and then settling it to Inventory Accounts.
    My Client uses Internal Orders to capture costs for small projects like Advertising campaign, Claim for warranty, House keeping charges etc.and once after all the charges are captured, they settle the Internal Orders to Inventory Accounts? (which is kind of confusing to me)
    I know that Internal Orders are used to capture the costs for small projects but I am confused as to how are those costs settled to Inventory Accounts??
    Is it possible to settle those small project costs to Inventory Accounts? If so what would be the business processes or postings that would need to be posted to Internal Orders(Ex: Goods Reciept or Inv Consumption)
    I am preparing a Business process design document and I need to document this.
    Could anyone please share their knowledge and explain this, It would be really helpful and will be really appreciated. I would be really generous in assigning points.
    Thanks for your help!
    Sandeep

    Hi Ashok,
    Thank you for your reply.
    The PCE does not have a default account assignment.
    The reason for this settlement is because we want to move the charges onto a  balance sheet account so they can be cross charged manually. The debits on the internal order are on a secondary CE as they came from an assessment out of a cost center.
    The flow should be:  CC assessment> IO> G/L
    CC assessment to IO happens on a secondary
    Debit sits on the IO on a secondary CE
    We want the IO to settle to a balance sheet G/L

Maybe you are looking for