Internal order settle to another internal order

dear all,
for internal order group have 2 order,and i want to settle by hierachy:
A order settle to B order,then B order settle to GL account, how to config the settlement rule for
this 2 orders?
this purpose is to simulate PS WBS/activity if internal order can be collect cost then settle to a final GL acct..

maybe i have make more detail for my question:
a order group contain internal order A/B,and order B under A like follow structure:
order group
- order A
-- order B
order A have plan/actual revenue/cost
order B only have plan cost
the settlement is try to settle order group: as my RA key is set as POC way to calculate revenue/cost,
the formula of POC = actual cost / plan cost * plan revenue
so i want the settle result of this group = actual cost of A / plan cost of A+B * plan revenue of A
now the settle result = actual cost of A / plan cost of A * plan revenue of A,not include plan cost of B
how to make it possible?

Similar Messages

Order Settlement (Ko88) Vs. Sales Order Settlement (VA88)

We would like to know what are the advantages and disadvantages of Production Order Settlement versus Sales Order Settlement.
What are the benefits between one and the other?
Please advice,
Thanks in advance,
Rio

Hello,
Thank you for replying.
We are an MTO Semiconductor manufacturing shop, High volume. somewhat repetitive but not frequent.
We have two clients:
Client 1 - Uses Standard Costing and Settles Production Orders to the Material itself.
Client 2 - Uses Actual Costing and Settles Production Orders to Sales Orders (automatic) then Settles Sales Orders to Profitability Analysi.
I'm hearing SAP does not recommend the process from Client 2 "Sales Order Settlement" because of the high volume of sales documents. still can't confirm this.
I would like to find out the following:
What are the Pros and Cons of Production order Settlement vs. Sales Order Settlement.
What are the reasons why one type of settlement is chosen over the other?
Also, I found some data from SAP Labs which relates to an Old Version of SAP, so I would like to know if this process is still current with Version 6.0
"...Settlement of the production order to the sales order is normally not required. The sales order item automatically picks up the cost incurred on the production order.
The production order must only be settled when:
- The production order is in a different company code than the sales order.
- The production order is a collective order
The sales order product cost processing will only pick up the cost on the top-level of a collective order, so the costs of the lower-level production orders must be settled to the highest level of the collective order..."
Please advice,
Rio

Sales order settlement Problem with Internal Order

HI Dear Friends,
How are you, I am fine.
We have 1 Process here Related with SD & FI/CO
for 1 process we have treat as a small Project,
the process is we have make 1st Contract and create Internal order and assign Internal order to Contract
then Create Sales Release Order and assing Internal Order in Settlement Rule in Sales order.
then we create billing ref to Contract and then we did PGI.
1) at billing time the Internal Order is Updatting
2) at PGI time internal Order is not updating - what is the right process - the internal; Order will be updating or not
then we have to do Sales order Settlement thtough Trasaction code VA88
what will happned at this level pleas be advicsed becos when i do this it is giving messges not is toi be settled.
Friends I did all exercise complete except Settlement trough T-Code VA88.
When I am going to do this settlement VA88 it is giving messages there is nothing to be settle.
What I have to do please be advised.
I did all these activities:
1)     Create sales Contract
2)     Create Internal Order
3)     Assign Internal Order to sales Contract
4)     Crate Release Sales Order
5)     Assign Internal Order to Release Sales Order
6)     Delivery & PGI
7)     Billing         (at billing time the internal Order should be Updates (pls advise it should be or not)
8)     Last is Settlement VA88 u2013 this time it is giving Error.
When I settle the Sales order to internal order what will happens. Which value will update.
Please reply me frds,
Thanks,
Srem.

hello Lakshmipathi,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
I tried to change the requierement class in order to put one with special stock E as you explained, but i still have my weird schedule line. When i put the item in the order it is 0 stock for today, but stock find in 12 days either if there is stock or no(unrestricted stock i mean).
If i change the RDD in more than 12 days the stock is available for the date requested.
If you have an idea of what could be wrong because on my case i want the schedule line to be at 0 while the sales order reservation has not been processed (via MB1B/412/E) and once the stock movement is done the schedule line has to be find.
I dont know if im clear enought..
To be more clear, i want the schedule line based on the "sales order stock" and not on the "unrestricted stock".
thanks for your help!
Guillaume

Production order settlement to statistical internal order

If you would like to settle a production order to a statistical internal order, could you at the same time settle to COPA ?

Hi,
principally its possible to add a real settlement receiver and a statistical settlement receiver. If you have entered the real acount assignment (CO-PA = PSG) in the settlement rule mark the line, tick the "detail" button (F2) and enter the statistical account assignment.
The settlement receivers (PSG and ORD) must be allowed in the settlement profile and in the allocation structure there must be a settlement cost element assigned to receiver type "PSG and ORD" (or it is settled cost element wise).
Please try!
Best regards, Christian

Order Settlement to another B area cost objects

Dear all
In my requirement We are carrying the work at one Business area on behalf of another business area. The maintenance order has some expenses amount,after completion of the job i need to settle into another business areas cost objects. But sap is giving the error only. Is ot possible?

Thenna,
Message to all: you really should get an OSS logon - its free and would save us all a lot of time...
However, this looks like a FICO issue... and here is the OSS Note text:
During settlement error message KD256 is output
"There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible".
The error message and the long text do not supply sufficient information on the causes for the error message.
Additional key words
CJ88, CJ8G, VA88, KO88, KO8G, CO88
Cause and prerequisites
Preconditions for message KD256 are:
1. The sender carries a results analysis key
and
2. it is
a) a sender with revenue
or
b) a production order with FUL rule to product which in the settlement period has neither the status DLV nor the status TECO
or
c) a WBS element which does not have the status TECO
or
d) an order, which in the settlement period has neither the status DLV nor the status TECO, and the indicator 'WIP on dependent orders' is in the results analysis version.
In these cases, only data from accrual calculation is settled. In the cases b) to d), no actual costs are settled to the receiver of the settlement rule.
The error message is now output
1. if no accrual calculation has been carried out,
or
2. the accrued data have already been settled
or
3. the flag 'Settlement to FI' has not been set in any of the results analysis versions
or
4. no posting rules have been defined for any of the results analysis categories.
Solution
1. Check for the cases b), c) and d) whether the sender already had the status GLV or TECO in the settlement period, that is, whether the delivery date or the date of the technical closure is prior to the posting date of the settlement. If this is not the case, the system continues to determine and settle in period WIP.
Note: Prior to Release 4.0, the system did not update the date of the technical closure with WBS elements. This is why the date of the technical closure was not checked in Release 3.0/3.1. This was an error in Release 3.0/3.1.
2. Check the settings in the Customizing of accrual calculation, that is, check the flags 'Settlement to FI' in the results analysis version and check the posting rules.
3. Check the previous settlements for the sender. For this use the function 'Extras -> Previous settlements' on the initial screen of the settlement.
4. If necessary, start accrual calculation for the sender again and start the settlement again afterwards.

Sales order stock to another sales order stock

i have make to order got order from customer. the material is treated as a special stock and va01 is created. and material is produced and put into sales order stock.
now customer cancelled the order. but another customer wanted the same material with same quantity. What are the step by step procedure to transfer the sales order stock to another customer.

move the stock from order/item to order/item usign tcode MB1B and movement type 413 E
Roberto

Investment order settlement- assignment field with order number in GL code

We are settling the investment order to the concerned asset and in reco account of the concerned asset it has to update assignment field with Investment order number from which order settlement was happend.
For example I am booking all the expences to 1000 GL account code for investment order and I am settling to 2000 GL code.
Investment order number is coming in 1000 GL code in fbl3n and for 2000 asset class (Reco 2000 GL code) it it not showing IO number.
We want IO number in 2000 GL code line item.
Do the the need full. It is very urgent..........
Edited by: sudhakara reddy jakku on May 31, 2008 8:09 AM

hi
when u are seeing gl line item .onse u enterd inthat screen change layout screen tab will be ther u plz see the IO filed and select that . to next saide it will give urs IO no.also

Sort Internal table based on another internal table

Hello All,
My Requirement is :
I have two internal tables itab1 and itab2. itab1 has partner_number along with some more fields/columns. Based on the partner_numbers of the itab1 i write a query to get the values for partner_last_name and central_block_flag from the table but000 and i fill these values into a new itab2.
Sort itab2 by partner_last_name and central_block.
Now how do I sort itab1 based on the sorted itab2-partner_number. I need to have itab1 sorted similar to the order in the itab2.
How do i do this?
Please let me know if you need more details.Looking forward for your support.
Regards,
Harish P M

Hello Micky,
Thank you for your early reply.
I have this scenario wherein i need to sort a existing internal table itab1 of type 'bapibus1006_relations' based on the 'Partner last name ' and 'Inactive/Active Flag'. These two fields are not available in this itab1 and so i need to create itab2 after a query on table but000.
Sorting itab2 is , first sort itab2 based on the 'Active flag' and then sort this itab2 again by 'Partner last name'(ascending order).
Finally when i get my sorted itab2 i would have to ensure that my objective of sorting itab1 is obtained.
I guess i sound better now.
Would be helpful if you could reply.
Regards,
Harish P M

How do I transfer my iTunes music from one internal hard drive to another internal hard drive without having to locate every song?

So I have two internal hard drives in my laptop but the hard drive that my music is on is running out of space. I want to transfer my music from the smaller hard drive to the larger hard drive so my computer can run faster. If I do this I'm afraid I'm going to have to locate every song within the iTunes library. Is there a way around it so I won't have to go in my files and locate every song? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Instead of moving the entire iTunes folder you can copy it, then do the Shift-launch trick to select the .itl file from its new location. If it works, then go back and delete the original location.
But maybe clarify your configuration ... specifically, is your "iTunes Library.itl" file currently on the same drive that your music files are stored on? Or, do you keep your .itl file on a separate drive than the native files? If the .itl file is on a separate drive right now, then moving or copying the music files over to be on the same drive can result in iTunes not knowing where your native files went. You can get around that using the Consolidate utility in iTunes, but that is not necessary if the .itl file lives with the music files.

Maintenance Order Settlement

Hi SAP gurus.
I have one Maintenance Order PM01, with Actual Costs. Now I want to settle this cost to the cost collecter.
Here is the problem. In SPRO I have defined a settlement rule where the default object type is a Cost Center.
My plant has a lot of equipments, and some of them have cost-centers, and another ones have internal orders.
When I try to settle the PM01 order to one equipment that has an internal order, the system returns an error, because of the SPRO definition.
Is it possible to ask the system to search in equipment data master the cost colecter? For exemple, if in the master data is Cost Center, then the order settle that a cost center, if in master data we have one internal order, the PM01 order settle to that internal order.
Thanks in advance.

hi
since you have maintained the CTR as your settlement receiver ,if the equipment does not have cost center then your settlement rule is not created automatically which is the main cause for error during settlement
for avoiding the same you can make the settlement rule mandatory for release in IMG hence user will try to maintain the settlement receiver when releasing the order .you can proceed with settlement.
Or check customer exit COOM0003 Customer function for automatic creation of settlement rules where with the help of technical people can fulfill your requirement.
regards
thyagarajan

Production order settlement in case of non valuated material

Hello guys,
Our client wants some of the materials have to be non valuated. These materials are raw materials and SFG also. We can assign UNBW material types to those materials.
I have created one material for test purpose. It doesn't contain the accounting view so as no valuation class. BOM of it , doesn't contain any component as client doesn't want to show any consumption on production order.While creating the order for that material system asks for the settlement rule. I skip that step and create the order. I do GR for the same.
My question is, is production order settlement essential for these orders? What if we don't settle the order. No activity type has been assign to the work center.
Kindly give ur valuable inputs.

Hi,
No need to create material as UNBW type.
Normal ROH, HALB, FERT material type we can achieve this.
In the BOM of FG or SFG goto item detail screen there is a tick mark in costing.
Remove the tick by OS23 - BOM status.
Now you can do your production as regular. But cost will not get update.You can do regular settlement also.
Regards,
Dharma

Prd Order Settlement Issue

Hi all,
While carrying out production order settlement for a production order, the system is determining the wrong GL A/C. Well it's deriving the GL A/C which does not exist. I need to change this assignment to a valid GL A/C. How am I suppose to fix this?
It's an MTO order, settlement cat. SDI. I'm not sure why the settlement rule is SDI for this specific order too, normally it should be MAT.
Regards,
G. Coelho

The valuation now is for sales order is incorrect. SDI means that the sales order stock is non-valuated and sales order is used to capture the costs. This is because the requirement class of the sales order is incorrect.
First check the requirement type in sales order (VA03). In procurement tab of the first main screen, it will show the requirement type for your sales order item.
Then check t-code OVZH, there will be a link between requirement type and requirement class.
Then check OVZG to check the requirement class.
(If you want to change, use the config.path Controlling -> Product Cost Controlling -> Cost Object Controlling -> Product Cost by Sales order -> Control for Sales-order-related Production... -> Check requirement class. Howeiver, this should be done after you consult with SD and CO consultant)
You will see the your requirement class. Check whether account assignment cat., and valuatio are both set to M (ind.cust.order w/o CO, and valuated sales order stock). I suspected that a sales order per your issue is set to non-valuated stock (Account Assignment E, valuation blank).
Hope it helps.
Edited by: ayethebing on Jul 16, 2010 1:34 PM

Prodn. order settlement

Dear Friends,
we have done the order settlement of period April (i.e.period 1 for fiscal yr 2008) as well as May (i.e.period 2 for fiscal yr 2008).
Now the issue is that our user has not shown the consumption of one of the raw material for FG produced in the April month and now they have done the consumption against that order with posting period of May.
so how can I reverse the order settlement for this particular order.
we have tried through KO88 with different permutations but it is not allowing to do the same.
please revert for this issue as it is on priority basis.
full points will be awarded for the relevent answers.
Regrads
Amitabh

Hi Amit,
You have to cascade the reversals; first reverse May then you can reverse April. I checked out the ERP financials forum and if you search for the 'settlement reverse' thread there, you will find details.
Warm Regards,
Sreekant.

Work order( maintainence order) settlement

hi,
i want to know whether the cost center used for settlement of work order and cost center assigned to work center are same or not. please help me with this. can anyone give some examples of scenarios.
thanks,
Monica

Monica,
Settlement: Example from SAP - Help
The following example illustrates the creation and processing of an order from the point of view of order settlement.
The Order
In a clarification plant, three pumps are to be cleaned in the pumping station. All three pumps are installed at the same functional location.
Planning and Planning Data
The planner creates an order, enters the functional location C1-B01 (pumping station) as a reference object and enters the three pumps in the object list. The order is to be settled to the pumping station cost center, which has the number 511. This means that all the costs posted to the order for cleaning the three pumps will be settled to cost center 511 when the job is complete.
The order data comprises the following:
Data on the Performing Work Center "PSC" (pump fitters):
Entry
Number of persons performing the job : 2
Performing cost center (= cost center of the employees performing the job): 909
Activity type: Cleaning
Planned number of work hours per person per pump: 1
Cost of activity type per hour: $ 150
Total planned work hours: 6
Total labor costs: $ 900
Data for Scheduled Material:
Entry
Consumption posting to the amount of: $ 150
Releasing and Processing the Order
Once the planning stage is complete, the planner releases the order for processing.
The employees from work center "PSC" start the work:
They withdraw the material scheduled for the order from the warehouse. Actual costs of $150 are incurred for the order and are debited directly from the balance sheet account.
The employees confirm the length of time they worked on the order. It took them a little longer than planned, so that the resulting actual costs posted to the order are $1050. These costs are credited to the performing work center.
Situation After Completion of the Work
After the work has been completed and the order settled, the debits are as follows:
Balance on the order: $ 0.00
Debit to the receiver cost center 511 (pumping station): $ 1200.00
Hope this gives you a fair idea as what it should be, Reward your points if this was helpful.
Regards,
Prasobh

Sales order with reference to sales order

Hi,
 I need to create a sales order with reference another sales order using bapi CreateFromDat2. Please note, Sales Ord. Dist. channel, Div, sold-to to of the new order are different from original order. I gave reference order in field order_header_in-REFDOCTYPE . I am getting following error when I perform single test " FB Call: insufficient parameters. Can any of you tell me how to overcome this issue. And is it possible to create an order refering to another Saler order with different Sales Ord, Dist. channel, Division, sold-to ?
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Cheers
Sudhaker
Message was edited by:
 Alvaro Tejada Galindo

There is an OSS note <a href="https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/370988">Note 370988 - BAPIs in SD: Creation with reference</a>
Symptom
This note describes the problems of the 'Create with reference' function when using BAPIs to create sales documents.
If you are working online, you can use this function module to create a sales document with reference to an existing sales document or a billing document (for example, a debit or credit memo request) according to fixed rules. The rules for transferring information from the source document to the target document are defined in the copying control on header and item level. The creation with reference permits an item selection.
When you use BAPIs in SD, a function of this type is not fully available. A reference is only possible for a quantity contract, so that the target quantity of the contract can be reduced by the order quantity of the sales document. Furthermore, the document flow is also updated.
As an alternative to 'Create with reference' in Transaction VA01, two variants are provided for solving the 'Create with reference' problem in the BAPI.
 1. Create a '1:1 ' - that is, a document copy of a sales document (customer quotation, order) with 'BAPI_SALESDOCUMENT_COPY'. At this point, you cannot create the 1:1 copy of either a billing document or a delivery.
 2. Create a sales document that refers to an existing document with 'BAPISDORDER_GETDETAILEDLIST' and 'BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2'.
Other terms
BAPI_SALESDOCUMENT_COPY, BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE, BAPI_CUSTOMERINQUIRY_CHANGE, BAPI_CUSTOMERQUOTATION_CHANGE, BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT1, BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2, BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDATA, BAPISDORDER_GETDETAILEDLIST
Reason and Prerequisites
As of yet, no method exists for creating a sales document that refers to an existing document.
Solution
For solution No. 1
 1. Create the documents using the BAPI_SALESDOCUMENT_COPY function module. However, this only permits a 1:1 copy without factoring out individual items.
 2. After you have created the document copy, you can use a change BAPI to edit this copy.
For solution No. 2
 1. Collect the data for the reference document (for example a customer quotation) with the 'BAPISDORDER_GETDETAILEDLIST' function module. In the example code, focus exclusively on the partners, items, schedule lines and conditions.
 2. Prepare the Data. Execute the 'copying control' manually. This way, you decide which values are to be transferred.
 3. Create the sales document using the 'BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2' function module by transferring the prepared data.
 4. Finally, you must remove a COMMIT WORK so that the sales document can be written into the database.
An example of solution 2 is attached as a text file. You are allowed to select items and quantities for example, if you use input parameters. If there are no entries, then transfer 1:1 from the reference document. When you enter the 'condition type' parameter, you can determine whether conditions are copied or recalculated ('G' for transferring from the preceding document; 'B' or ' ' for re-determining, and 'C' for re-determining with transfer of the manual elements).
Sample : <a href="https://websmp108.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/012003146900000486112004E/BAPI_COPY_WITH_REF.txt">ZZ_MS_BAPI_COPY</a>
Regards

Internal order settle to another internal order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for