Internal Order settlement to both G/L account and Cost center

Gurus,
When I am trying to settle Internal Order to both Reciever categories G/L and CTR(cost center) in a single internal order master.
Cost is getting settled from Sender to reciever only using CTR.  Reciever category G/L(B/S account) is not getting used and cost is not getting into G/L account receiver.
Can't we have this scenario ? Or Is there something I need to do ?
Thanks in Advance,
GB

Hi GB,
This is possible. Kindly check your distribution rule and ensure that the GL account (settlement receiver) has a share, in percentage or in amount.
Regards,
Darrel

Similar Messages

  • Not updating G/L account and cost center with BAPI BAPI_PO_CREATE1

    Hello Friends,
    The two fields G/L ACCOUNT and Cost Center is not updated using BAPI BAPI_PO_CREATE1. I am unable to understand why? This is what i am passing to account assignment structure( POACCOUNT). Filled POACCOUNTX structre as well. I have passed company code at the header level.
    PO_ITEM = 00010
    SERIAL_NO = 01
    CREAT_DATE = sy-datum
    GL_ACCOUNT = 621000
    COSTCENTER = 1000
    CO_AREA = 4000
    Please let me know why it is not updating anything i missed while passing?
    2>I need to update GR quantity but this field is not available in the BAPI ..Please let me know how to update this field.
    Any help is highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Raj

    Hi, I have a problem I use the bapi BAPI_PO_CREATE1, I pass the table pt_poaccount in the parameter poaccount but the bapi when register my purchase order doesn't register correctly the values KOSTL, AUFNR, PS_PSP_PNR, NPLNR of the tablepoaccount and register the default values of the contract. Please i need help with this.
    CLEAR s_poaccount.
         s_poaccount-po_item     = <fs_datos>-ebelp.
         s_poaccount-serial_no   = w_serial.
         s_poaccount-costcenter  = <fs_datos>-kostl.
         s_poaccount-orderid     = <fs_datos>-aufnr.
         s_poaccount-wbs_element = <fs_datos>-ps_psp_pnr.
         s_poaccount-network     = <fs_datos>-nplnr.
         s_poaccount-activity    = <fs_datos>-vornr.
         s_poaccount-quantity    = <fs_datos>-menge.
         s_poaccount-net_value   = <fs_datos>-brtwr.
         s_poaccount-creat_date  = sy-datum.          
         s_poaccount-itm_number  = <fs_datos>-ebelp.  
         s_poaccount-co_area = '1001'.               
         APPEND s_poaccount TO pt_poaccount.
    CLEAR s_poaccountx.
         s_poaccountx-po_item     = <fs_datos>-ebelp.
         s_poaccountx-serial_no   = w_serial.
         s_poaccountx-po_itemx = 'X'.
         s_poaccountx-serial_nox = 'X'.
         s_poaccountx-creat_date = 'X'.
         s_poaccountx-itm_number = 'X'.
         s_poaccountx-co_area = 'X'.
         s_poaccountx-costcenter = 'X'.
         s_poaccountx-orderid = 'X'.
         s_poaccountx-wbs_element = 'X'.
         s_poaccountx-network = 'X'.
         s_poaccountx-activity = 'X'.
         s_poaccountx-quantity = 'X'.
         s_poaccountx-net_value = 'X'.
         APPEND s_poaccountx TO  pt_poaccountx.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'
         EXPORTING
           poheader          = pe_poheader
           poheaderx         = pe_poheaderx
         IMPORTING
           exppurchaseorder  = pi_exppurchaseorder
         TABLES
           return             = pt_return
           poitem           = pt_poitem
           poitemx         = pt_poitemx
           poschedule    = pt_poschedule
           poschedulex  = pt_poschedulex
           poaccount      = pt_poaccount
           poaccountx    = pt_poaccountx
           poservices     = pt_poservices
           posrvaccessvalues = pt_posrvaccessvalues.
    The BAPI is register with these values as default however i pass other values in table
    pt_poaccount

  • No functional area derived from GL account and cost center ccombination sel

    Hi,
    When doing a goods issue for a delivery, am getting this error. Hope somebody could advice.
    "No functional area derived from GL account and cost center combination selected."

    Hi,
    Go to FS00 and specify the functional area for the gl account. Go cost center change mode specify the functional area. Define the f area in Tcode OKBD, FSP2,KA02,KS12,
    Hope this is clear, if yes assign points
    Regards,
    Sankar

  • Control G/L account and Cost Center for movement type 251

    Dear Friends,
    I would like to use mov. type 251 for GI for sale and like to control over G/L account and Cost center.
    The G/L account is by default from the valuation class of the the material and if the user will enter wrong G/L
    we had done the customising in OMJJ movement type 251 - Account grouping - Unchecked the check box of column
    "Check account assignment" - Impact is " the system always uses the G/L accounts or account assignments determined automatically"
    I also made default cost center for G/L account and plant wise through OKB9.
    Now I would like to suppress/dispaly the G/L account and cost center - for same I had done Setting in Entry control menu of OMJJ for 251 of field Account control - Value  - "-" field is suppressed. But it is not working.
    Please advise to solve this situation.
    Thanks & Regards
    Rajan

    Dear Rajan
    Yes, I have checked in MB1A earlier. We have separate node for Field seletion layout for Enjoy transaction MIGO for mvt type in which the G/L account (KONTO) an Cost center (KOSTL) have only optional or required entry selection.
    warm regards
    Ramakrishna.

  • GL account and cost center field appearing for Goods issue movt type 201

    Hi SAP Gurus
    We are trying to post goods issue in ecc6 . The problem is that the GL Account and cost center fields are available fields .The cost center field is logical but why the GL account field is avaiable .
    How we can grey out the same field as it is going to be picked up from the valuation class setting in GBB - VBR ? Any ideas
    Regards
    Hitesh

    Hi Ravi
    You think that its ok we have to input the cost center .
    But if you allow the users to input the GL then you are overriding the whole purpose of defining the valuation class and offsetting entries ? What is your opinion ?When you input the material in the goods issue screen the offsetting entry needs to be picked from the GBB -VBR .Although even if you do not enter the GL the system posts the Godds issue document .But from the control perspective this needs to be suppressed .
    What do you think ?
    I have also posted the same in Logistics forum .
    Once  again many thanks for your help .In case you find some solution this would be of great help
    Regards

  • G/L Accounts and cost center

    i would like to find the list of valid G/l Accounts and cost center for a input company code. Is there any good tables for getting this information. ?

    I don't think there is such a thing. If a GL is valid for a company code and a cost center is valid for the corresponding controlling area, then the transaction should post. A relationship between controlling area and company code is in table A059 (Controlling Area/Company Code). This table is empty in our system, so I don't think that checks will be made.
    Rob

  • G/L account and cost center in Delivery

    Hi,
    When we create the deliveri, first in sales order user only enters and func center,  that fuind center comes in the deliveri goods movement document,  along with that when i check in MIGO document display along with fund center i can see the cost cenert and g/l account for which that document is posted, In our system we are using same chart of account for two compnay codes, and in OBYC  for GBB-VAX  we have maintain one G/L account 893011, and in cost element for this 893011 we have assign one cost center  for one compnay code that cost center is OK  but for othere one we want to assign different cost center,  by keeping the same account,  how we can do this.
    regards,
    zafar
    Edited by: zafar_karnalkar on Jan 6, 2011 6:36 AM

    Dear Zafar,
    If you desire you maintain two different cost centers for the two company and you need to have both of them posted on the same G/L account and Cost element, I would advice you to:
    - create a Z table where by controlling area you define where the specific cost center need to get posted
    - include this validation check in the exit for validation for controlling
    - include this validation check in the exit for validation for finance
    - include this validation check also in the sales order user exit
    Standard SAP seems do not have direct link between cost centers & cost elements. For this reason ideal solution is to generate a table where you may define you needed structure.
    E.g.: some ideas on the table you may create
    Controlling area
    Cost element from
    Cost element to
    Cost center from
    Cost center to
    I hope this suggestion may answer to your need.
    Regards,
    Viviana A.

  • Gl account and cost center in fb01

    hi,
    1 may i know why balance sheet account allowed to have cost center? in fb01, when i enter balance sheet account, cost center field is available.
    2 why vendor or customer account not allowed to have cost center in fb01?
    thanks
    rgds

    Dear,
    Asset is one of your balance sheet account and it is often a need to track assets based on cost center so that it is available.
    Vendor and customer are never tracked by cost cetners but the profit center. Because cost center are often like Production, Administration, Sales etc.
    So vendor can not belong to aspects like sales, production etc. Moreover vendor and customers derive profit center from offsetting line item. Both cost centers and profit centers are not available in line item.
    Regards,
    Chintan Joshi

  • Profit center accounting and cost center relationship

    Experts, in the future as we look to tie the PCA cube with the CO cube, the referential integrity will be important.  What I see as being important is capturing the profit center, cost center and account that was used at the transactional level and not from an arbitrary hierarchy.  As such, in the PCA cube, it would be optimal to have the cost center assigned to the transaction be available.  This assumes that the PCA totals are by profit center, cost center and account.  Furthermore, I will want to build a jump target from the PCA cube to the CO cube where we can see this data by cost center and cost element or vice versa.  There seems to be some uncertainty on if the PCA cube has the cost center informaiton, so how would I do this?

    I don know if i understood it correctly but If you assign you profit center in your cost center you should be able to get all that you need.
    Assign points if helpful

  • Internal Order settlement to one value field in CO-PA (revenue and cost CE)

    hi there,
    we want to settle an internal order to one CO-PA Value field.
    The problem is, that when on the internal orders are postings with CE type revenue and costs, in settlement it reduces the internal oder by the correct amount, but in CO-PA all values come with positive sign)...That would be fine if we would use several value fields, but we want to use only one value field for this settlement..
    IO: Revenue: 10 Cost 5  ---> 5  --> thats the amount we want to transfer to CO-PA through settlement
    in COPA: 15  (10 + 5)..
    I treid to exclude the revenue CE from settlement, but this doesn't work (settlement rule incomplete)
    Thank you for your help.
    Regards,
    Markus

    Hi,
    The sign of a value field in CO-PA for the settlement of orders, projects is always determined depending on the cost element type of the cost element/account.
    The logic is as follows for record type C:
                               sign in CO-PA for postings
    cost element type            debit          credit
        11                                   -               +
        others                             +               -
    The logic of settlement into CO-PA works like this:
    1.) The first step is that all values are transferred from the sender as they were posted in the database on this side
        On the sender side all debits have '+' sign and all credits have    a '-' sign no matter what cost element type is used.
        Usually costs are posted as debit with cost element type '1'    and revenues as credits with cost element type '11'.
    2.) The second step reverses the sign of all cost elements with type    '11' (and exclusively those).
        The intention is to have only positive values in CO-PA to be used in reporting. (There you can set up rules what needs to be added or subtracted).
    Note 369378 explains the logic and provides a workaround.
    regards
    Waman

  • PO with account category and cost center as mandatory fields.

    Hi everyone.
    Pls. I need help with the next proces.
    I have to customize a PO with Account Category as mandatory and the PO always must have the same G/L account and Cost Center.
    Thanks for your help.
    Regards.

    Hi..
    Maintain Default Cost Centers for the Cost Elements in OKB9 transaction..Please check with your Controlling Consultant for this...
    And  SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Account Assignment > Maintain Account Assignment Categories > For Account Assignment Category (For e.g. "K" - Cost Center), in detailed screen, "Derive acct. assgt." should be active
    Cheers
    Ravi.

  • ZGPGL - Copying Accounts and Cost Centers to the SAP system

    Hi all,
    When I try to copy accounts and cost centers from my excel mapping document to the SAP system I can only copy about 20 of them at a time. I have about 30,000 accounts and am wondering if there is a quicker way to do this.
    Thanks,
    Deki

    Write a catt script to create the GL account and cost center master data. they are relativley easy to learn and create. They work great for this. I have used them several times for that purpose.
    pls assign points to say thanks.

  • Internal order settlement to G/L account

    Dear All,
    User has created one internal order 650002012 and the settlement profile is created settle to G/L account S882000000. this is a cost element category "1" (Loss on contract cancellation & co).
    In the internal order The Responsible cost center is DA01D89998 (Validation & Eng Admin-St) the profit center for this "DA01".
    In the internal order the Requesting cost center is DA26ZPSHRD (Shared Cost Center for Deltron), the profit center is "DA26"
    in the settlement profile when i double click on the settlement rule, he has assigned the Cost center DA01ZPSHRD (Shared Cost Center for Ko) and the profit center is "DA01".
    But when he execute the T.C "KO8G" the system is showing the error is " G/L account requires an assignement to CO object".
    1. The receiver G/L account has created as a cost element. is this correct?
    2. In the allocation structure do we have to select the "By cost element check box" or do we have to give the secondary cost element in the settlement cost element field.
    Please give the sugessions to solve this problem.
    Thanks and regards,
    Rao.

    It sounds like you are a little confused on how internal order settlement works.  If you want the internal order to settle to a G/L account then you must enter the G/L account number in the settlement rule in the internal order.  To do this, click on the settlement rule button in the order, select category G/L and enter the G/L account number.  In order for you to be able to select G/L as a settlement object the settlement profile you've assigned to the order must allow this.  Check the settlement profile and make sure that G/L account is listed as settlement optional or settlement required.  Also check the allocation structure that is attached to the settlement profile. In the allocation structure you must have an entry under the settlement cost element for receiver category G/L.  Here you should specify a cost element of type 22 as the settlement cost element.
    When you make those settings you will be able to specify the receiving G/L account in the internal order.  The system will then credit the internal order for the settlment amount with the credit posted on the category 22 cost element specified in the allocation structure.  The debit will appear on the G/L account you specified in the internal order's settlement rule.  Normally, the receiving G/L account would not be setup as a cost element.  if you do set it up as a cost element you will need to use an automatic account assignment setting (OKB9) to specify the cost object that it will post to.
    thanks,

  • Internal Order Settled to AUC reverse process

    Dear Gurus,
    I had a hard time to think how to do the processes over and over again.
    The current process is:
    Every month the internal order (investment and real order)  will collect the expense on AUC and settle to the AUC.
    At the end of year, the AUC will be settled to Fix Asset by internal order settlement rules.
    Now what if the settled expense was not correct. For example, in 2009, I created the IO and settled the IO to AUC in several months. But in 2010, I found the expense in IO shall not be settled to AUC, the expense was only the overheads. ( The AUC was not settled to Fix Assets). Just like I wanna reverse the settlement in 2009.
    So it would be like this in a flow chart.
    IO-> AUC->FX
    Now I need to do this:
    AUC->IO->GL
    For IO->GL, I have figured out that I can change the settlement rule profile and make the GL account allowed.
    But for AUC->IO , I have no idea and almost burn my brain on it.
    Could you please help to throw light ?
    Emma

    Hi,
    I tried 2 write offs, please help to see whether I am doing right. Thank you!
    I tried to reverse the document but it was not allowed.
    I am thinking to post a document like the following:
    1. Doc in 2009
    50 8910000000 settlement AUC             2,964,800.00-        Order:C1BIC83002
    70 3270600041 000327000032 0000    2,964,800.00
    2. What I want to post:
    40 8910000000 settlement AUC         2,964,800.00      C1BIC83002
    75 3270600041 000327000032 0000    2,964,800.00-
    But it gave me an error when I enter the asset number.
    Asset is investment measure, transaction type not allowed
    Message no. AK005
    Diagnosis
    Asset   that is to be posted is an investment measure. You are not allowed to post transactions that affect acquisition value using the current transaction.
    Procedure
    Check the asset and transaction type 160.
    I am not sure which transaction type is correct.
    Emma.

  • Maintain internal order settlement rule using LSMW

    HI ALL
    I want to do mass maintenance of internal order settlement rule. Settlement category is PSG.
    But when I use LSMW to do KO02, I only can input one settlement receriver, the first line will be overwritten by the second line.
    I also see BAPI INTERNAL_ORDER_CREATE,but cannot find PSG as a settlement category.
    Does anyone know how to do this?
    THX
    Deelia

    Hi Lian
    When you do recording, enter two settlement rules..
    Then, before pressing the "DEFAULT ALL" button, change the Field names for the 2nd settlement rule
    The problem you described happens because the field names for both settlement rules are same.. Hence, it gets overwritten
    Assume that field name for Order is AUFNR... You can change the field name in recording to ZAUFNR for one of the fields
    See the screen shot, wherein I changed the name of the recorded field to _01, _15 and _70
    Br. Ajay M

Maybe you are looking for