Internal Order -Systeme Requirement

Internal Order accounting provides you with a comprehensive suite of features such as status management, commitments management, detailed reports, and analysis that helps you monitor your jobs through their entire lifecycles
Give me the T-Codes for the above system requirement
Thanks
Prathima

Hi,
Check following tcodes
KOB1 - Orders: Actual Line Items
KOB2 - Orders: Commitment Line Items
KOBP - Orders: Plan Line Items
KOB4 - Orders: Budget Line Items
S_ALR_87013008 - Summarization Object: Actual/Plan/Commitment

Similar Messages

Internal Order not required

Dear All,
Here I am doing F-02 transaction there i am giving Cost center, Profit center and Business area and Internal order is not required, But system is giving message like "Please enter Correct Internal Order".
I checked in OBC4 and OB41, there Order is in Optional.
Here my exact requirement is without entering internal order the entry should be posted. The system should not ask the above message.
Can you please guide me how to fix this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Ramesh Reddy

Dear Ramesh,
Please check whether you have validation or substitution for this TCode.

Internal Order - System Status LKD

Hi All,
For an internal order which has system status LKD active, can I mark it for deletion?
When tried to do so, I get an error message like
" E BS 013 System status LKD is active (ORD XXX)
KO 424 Order XXX / Mark for deletion "
What can be done?
Thanks ,
Janani

Hi,
if your order is marked for deletion then you can't put it for locked status and it goes other way around i.e. if your order is lkd ,it can't be marked for deletion.
Reward points if it helps.
Regards
Karan

Internal Order & Asset

Dear All,
user want to control the asset purchasing with approved budget. in order to achieve the user requirement we created internal order , entered the budget & activate the availability control.
at the time of PO creation, we input Asset & internal order. system activated the budget availability control on PO/PR elevl. which one is good.we also created the statiscal cost element for the Asset reconciliation account. For this our requirement is fulfiling
we have the following query.
1-the process that we are following, is it ok ?
2-is there impact/ effect for creating the statiscal cost element of asset reconciliation account.
3-is there any other process ?.

Hi Friend,
The process what you are following is correct...
There would not be any impact by creating the statistical cost elements.....
Another option is ......
Create an internal order... and create the purchase order against Internal order ( No need to give any assets and no need to create any statistical cost elemetn also)
Then settle the internal order to Fixed assets....
Thanks & Regards
Ravi C

Scrap HU via HUMO - mvt type 551 doesn't req internal order

Hi there --
I want to require Internal Order (CO/PP order) on movement type 551 / scrap transactions. I made the CO/PP order a required entry via OMBW, and now when I process a 551 via MB1A, the internal order is required as expected. However, if I scrap a handling unit via HUMO (Edit > Change HU Posting > Other Postings > Pick for scrapping), the system does not require (or even allow) me to enter an internal order. I am able to save the transaction, and a 551 movement is processed without an internal order on the FI posting.
Any ideas on what's going on here and how I can ensure that the order number is required in HUMO for scrap txns???
Thanks!
Allison

I logged an OSS note with SAP about the inability to support the internal order number entry via the HUMO transaction.
They replied:
Unfortunately there is no standard possibility to make this field
available for any movements with HUMO (Main Program SAPLHUMO) in
standard. You only will reach your expectation with a modification in
the logic of the SAP Standard solution. Please check note 170183.
The customizing table MIGO_CUST_FIELDS, is where fields are set to
obligatory or optional. This table is specifically for setting fields obligatory or optional
when the movement is done through the transaction MIGO and other IM
transactions. The table description for MIGO_CUST_FIELDS as follow-
[MIGO: Field Selection per Movement Type]
Has anyone attempted this type of Mod?

Check on internal order

Hi,
I am using internal order as a settlement receiver for capital maintenance order.
But some times accounts department closes the internal order before capital maintenance order settlement on this internal order.
I want to apply some check on internal order so that during closing of internal order system should check all the capital order maintenance order whether they are fully settled or not.
Plz suggest how to achieve this.
Regards
Rakesh

Rakesh,
You need to check with your FICO team for a suitable user-exit or BADI relating to internal orders.
Alternatively, open a new post in the Financials forum.
PeteA
Moderator: Certainly, there is no need in opening new post!

Internal Order

Dear All,
Recently,we have configured and assgined Internal Order for every asset for the tracebility and working well.
For a old PO(before implementing the above),Down payment made.
Now when trying to enter Internal order,system is not allowing.
How to go with this without reversing the down payment?
Regards

Hi,
Good evening and greetings,
Wishing you a Happy New Year 2007
Please go through the following link
Note 182140 - Internal order: Deleting the logical system
Please reward points if found useful
Thanking you
With kindest regards
Ramesh Padmanabhan

Goods Issuance against Statistical Internal Order

Dear Sir,
We need to monitor the expenses against a particular activity . For this we had opened an Statistical Internal Order . Pl guide us as what steps need to be followed for Issuing of Material (MB1a) , against the Statisical Internal Order reference .
I will be highly obliged for the kind help pl .
Rgds
Sonia Agarwal

Dear Mr Manish
Thanks for reply .
During MB1a , movement 261 after giving Internal Order , System is asking for the Cost Center also . I desire that Cost Center should come automatically from Internal Order . As in KO01 , I have already mentioned the Responsible Cost Center for this Internal Order .
Kindly help us pl .
Rgds
Sonia Agarwal

Internal Order closure

Hi Experts,
While closing the Internal Order, system giving below error message. However, when we execute KOB1, there are no items getting displayed.
Kindly let me know, which tcode can be used for listing open down payments or down payment requests at internal order level.
There are still open down payments for ORD XXXX
Message no. KO020
Diagnosis
There are still open down payments or down payment requests for order ORD XXXX.
System Response
Order ORD XXXX cannot be deleted.
Procedure
You must first clear all open down payments or down payment requests for order ORD XXXX.
You can then delete the order.

Hi,
This error message is not only given if open Down payment exists but also as a result of open items remaining 'uncleared' for a
vendor associated with the costs against this Order.
The best advice I can give for this issue is to check the down payments. It might appear that they have been cleared (balance = 0) but most likely they have not been from an FI-Point of view.
Please investigate the postings against this Order to locate a vendor and then...
   Please run transaction FBL1
   Please flag the option tags "Open Items",
   "Open at key date"
   "Type: Special G/L transactions".
So they must be cleared before you are able to set the status.
Open items may be cleared or reversed using Transaction: F-44
regards
Waman

Internal Order cause GL Missing

Dear SD Gurus,
I'm trying to use Internal Order in my account assignment tab, at item level
but whenever I put the internal order, system will issue out error message "GL account missing".
If I remove it, it will be OK and I will post.
Any idea why?
Please advice.
Regards,
Soo

Missing config - account determination

Internal Orders versus Project Systems

Hi
My client is currently using WBS elements for capital projects. Project System is not in scope; thus, we are trying to decide whether we should bring it in scope with limited functionality or use internal orders for capital projects. I'm writing a position paper describing comparison of using project system versus internal order. Can any one of you please help me in providing the differentiating points. And also can you please give a description of capital projects.
Thanks a lot in advance.

Hi,
To begin with Internal order is a cost object like the WBS elements and activities in the Projects.
For the capital Projects following are the Points that should Favor the PS as compared to Internal Orders:
1. Time planning Possible
2. Resourse Planning possible.
3. Capacity planning and leveling possible.
4. Cost planning is possible in detail.
5. Material Planning possible.
6. Budget planning is possible in detail for the various phases of the project.
7. Cost and Budget monitoring is possible at the various phases in detail.
8. For the long term projects the Cash management is possible.
9. Revenue Planning and monitoring is possible in details.
Above all the PS is more flexible in handling all the project related issues than Internal order.
Now its upto one to use the functionality of PS to one's requirement.
In short PS module is like an Expert Doctor than a general physician.
Hope its useful.
Reward points if useful.
Thanks..

Why internal order settlement is require

why internal order settlement is require
and in internal orders acctual cost is plan cost is 100 and acctual is 150
then which amount we have to settle in internal order
regards
venkatareddy

Hey Venky,
An internal order is usually used as an interim collector of costs and an aid to the planning, monitoring, and controlling processes needed. When the job has been completed, you settle the costs to one or more receivers (cost center, fixed asset, profitability segment, and so on).
During settlement, some or all of the plan or actual costs incurred on an object are allocated to one or more receivers. The system automatically generates offsetting entries to credit the sender object. The debit postings assigned once to a sender object remain in place, even after settlement to a receiver (and can therefore be displayed). The costs settled are updated on the corresponding receiver object and displayed in reporting.
To be able to settle an order, you must have saved a settlement rule in each of the senders. This settlement rule determines where the costs are to be settled to. You can achieve this in two ways:
Settlement to One Receiver:You use this basic form of order settlement to completely settle the costs collected on the internal order. This is either to a cost center, or a G/L account under a settlement cost element. The system generates the appropriate settlement rule from the information contained in the internal order master data.
Comprehensive Settlement:Definition of a comprehensive settlement rule gives you more settlement possibilities, for example, you can:Settle costs to a wide range of receivers (project, sales order, profitability segment, and so on).
Specify how the costs are to be distributed between receivers.
Define the cost elements under which the sender is to be credited and the receivers debited.
Constraints:You can only use one of these settlement methods at a time: For example, if you defined settlement to one cost center in the master data for an internal order, then you can only define a more comprehensive settlement rule once you have deleted the first rule.
Hope this helps. Requesting to reward points please.
Rgds
manish

Open Internal Orders from legacy system

Hi,
Is there a way to bring over open projects (Internal Orders) from legacy system into SAP?, especially the way to bring over legacy cost information collected on such projects.
Would appreciate any help,
Ram
Message was edited by:
Ram R

Hi
As such you cannot do this. You download your Legacy system data to an excel sheet and then upload the PO details into SAP using an LSMW etc.
Regards
Dev

Internal order - Error - Different logical system for order

Hello all,
I try to send IDoc (INTERNAL_ORDER) from system A to system B.
I have done:
- BD64 / WE20 / WE21
But after having customizing I have got following error:
Different logical system for order xxxxxx
Message no. 2075ALE001
Diagnosis
Internal order xxxxxxx already exists in system B. Its master system B is different from the master system A of the new internal order to be distributed with the same order number xxxxxxx.
System Response
Internal order xxxxxxx with master system A cannot be distributed in system B.
Procedure
Check customizing for ALE for internal orders.
How to solve this?
My aim is to maintain internal order master data in test system.
Thanks for your help.
David

I have found something.
If I change in table AUFK, logical from empty to A (master) and I run IDOC then IDOC has been correctly integrated.
Then: how to define "master"?

Business Area required while creating Internal Order

Hi Gurus,
While creating Internal Order, Business Area is coming required.
Please tell me how can i make it as a optional field.
Please revert asap.
Thank you

gverma,
While making the Internal Order, you are using a company code that intends to create business-area balance sheets. This is why you must enter a business area.
You can see this text if you double-click on the error message that flashes on your status bar at the bottom of your screen, when SAP says "Enter the business area".
Unfortunately, the only way to make this optional is to de-activate Business Area-wise financial statments for your company code, which, I suspect you might not want to do merely to be able to make an Internal Order with a BA.
Regards
Gulshan

Internal Order -Systeme Requirement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for