Internal routing

Hi, I'm using a 2.5 intel core i5 iMac running 10.8.4. I use Traktor pro 2 and want to route the record output of traktor into logic. Im trying to use Jack but cannot get the audio into Logic. Can anyone help? Thanks

Do some reading here to get the idea:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/12946606#12946606
This is the basic stuff to make the routing you want, although you'll have to fill in your actors to make it happening!
Cheers!

Similar Messages

  • Internally Route DIO on R Series FPGA

    Hello, currently using an R-Series PCIe 7852 board with LabVIEW 2010 SP1 on 64bit Windows 7.
    I used to use a 6602 board and would sometimes use the RITS bus to connect the output of one counter to the input of another counter thus saving myself the trouble of having to physically connect them. On the 7852R board I'd like to connect the output of one DIO line to the input of another. I can physically use a wire but wonder if there's anyway of doing it internally like on the 6602?
    Thanks,
    Ed

    Edward,
    Stu is correct. On the FPGA you have access to all of the values at the same time, so you could either wire them together or simply just read off the original line instead of looping it back to another input. You actually have much more flexibility in terms of internal routing than on a 6602 card because all of the IO goes through the FPGA, whose behavior you define.The only caveat is that if youre going to be changing this often you may want to physically wire it instead of recompiling a bitfile to connect a single line. 
    Regards,
    Kyle M.
    Applications Engineering
    National Instruments

  • MPLS - How are external/internal routes distinguished?

    Hi all
    I was setting up an MPLS environment and wanted to get some more information about how MPLS VPN's work. Basically I have three sites connected to the MPLS cloud. Site A runs EIGRP on the customer side and Site B runs OSPF on the customer side. Site C is the one in question. The way I have it designed, Sites A and C have full visability into one another and sites B and C have full visibility into one another. When I configure site C with eigrp, all proper routes are seen, but the OSPF routes from site B are seen as EIGRP external routes. When I switch site C to OSPF, EIGRP routes from site A are seen as OSPF External type 2 routes. I guess my ultimate question is, How does the PE router at site C know the originating protocol? All the routes it receives are from BGP. Does a certain attribute carry this? If so, is this feature specific to Cisco gear or an RFC standard? Thanks in advance for all your help. I can include configs if that would help, below I'll show you my RD and RT's for each VRF and the routing tables of the CE router at Site C before and after the change.
    Site A
    ip vrf a
    rd 1:111
    route-target export 1:100
    route-target import 1:101
    Site B
    ip vrf c
    rd 3:333
    route-target export 3:301
    route-target import 1:101
    Site C
    ip vrf a
    rd 1:111
    route-target export 1:101
    route-target import 1:100
    route-target import 3:301
    Change from EIGRP to OSPF
    Gateway of last resort is not set
         6.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    D       6.6.6.6 [90/435200] via 10.2.1.1, 00:05:26, Ethernet0/0
         7.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    C       7.7.7.7 is directly connected, Loopback1
         8.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    D EX    8.8.8.8 [170/2560025856] via 10.2.1.1, 00:02:13, Ethernet0/0
    D EX 111.0.0.0/8 [170/2560025856] via 10.2.1.1, 00:02:13, Ethernet0/0
         10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
    C       10.2.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
    D       10.1.1.0/24 [90/307200] via 10.2.1.1, 00:05:56, Ethernet0/0
    D       10.20.0.0/16 [90/435200] via 10.2.1.1, 00:05:56, Ethernet0/0
    C       10.77.0.0/16 is directly connected, Loopback2
    D EX 192.168.1.0/24 [170/2560025856] via 10.2.1.1, 00:02:43, Ethernet0/0
    R7(config)#no router eigrp 22
    *Mar  1 02:10:20.747: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 22: Neighbor 10.2.1.1 (Ethernet0/0) is
    down: interface down
    R7(config)#router ospf 3
    R7(config-router)#network 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0
    R7(config-router)#network 7.7.7.7 0.255.255.255 area 0
    R7(config-router)#end
    R7#show ip route
    Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
           D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
           N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
           E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
           i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
           ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
           o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
    Gateway of last resort is not set
         6.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    O E2    6.6.6.6 [110/409600] via 10.2.1.1, 00:00:27, Ethernet0/0
         7.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    C       7.7.7.7 is directly connected, Loopback1
         8.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    O IA    8.8.8.8 [110/21] via 10.2.1.1, 00:00:27, Ethernet0/0
    O IA 111.0.0.0/8 [110/21] via 10.2.1.1, 00:00:27, Ethernet0/0
         10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
    C       10.2.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
    O E2    10.1.1.0/24 [110/1] via 10.2.1.1, 00:00:26, Ethernet0/0
    O E2    10.20.0.0/16 [110/409600] via 10.2.1.1, 00:00:26, Ethernet0/0
    C       10.77.0.0/16 is directly connected, Loopback2
    O IA 192.168.1.0/24 [110/11] via 10.2.1.1, 00:00:26, Ethernet0/0
    R7#trace 6.6.6.6
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Tracing the route to 6.6.6.6
      1 10.2.1.1 652 msec 396 msec 192 msec
      2 40.1.1.9 [MPLS: Labels 18/24 Exp 0] 2264 msec 2640 msec 2532 msec
      3 30.1.1.3 [MPLS: Labels 18/24 Exp 0] 2320 msec *  *
      4 10.1.1.1 [MPLS: Label 24 Exp 0] 1816 msec 1792 msec 2148 msec
      5 10.1.1.2 1940 msec *  2200 msec
    R7#

    Hello Edward,
    I see nothing strange in the results you have posted. They are completely natural to the process of carrying customer routes over MPLS L3 VPN.
    You know yourself that the customer routes are carried between PE routers using BGP, and from PE towards CE, these routes are redistributed from BGP into the particular routing protocol running between PE and CE. Each of these routing protocols automatically marks redistributed networks as external networks. For OSPF, this is a normal part of the open protocol specification - that routes injected into OSPF via redistribution shall be represented as external routes (and carried in LSA-5). Similarly, when you redistribute into EIGRP from a different routing protocol, these routes will be carried by EIGRP as external networks. So what you see here is natural and normal. Even if all sites ran the same routing protocol (EIGRP or OSPF), one site would see networks from other sites as external routes.
    In fact, there are extensions to BGP using extended community attributes that try to preserve the original nature of the redistributed routes. The prerequisite is that all sites run the same IGP, either OSPF or EIGRP. In that case, EIGRP routes carried over MPLS can be made look like internal routes although they are redistributed, and OSPF will make the routes appear as inter-area routes, not as external routes. There is even a modification to OSPF allowing you to see other sites as intra-area routes (though this requires configuring so-called OSPF sham links between PEs). All of this is done because an internal network is always preferred to an external network. This causes trouble if there is a backup link directly interconnecting two sites, bypassing the MPLS cloud. As the routing protocol run over this link advertises all networks as internal, this link would always be preferred to the MPLS VPN which is exactly the opposite of what you want to do.
    Please feel welcome to ask further!
    Best regards,
    Peter

  • Weird Internal Routing

    Hi Guys,
    Logic 8 has worked fine for over a year untill I used it with an Edirol firewire interface. I just have the sound coming out of the macbook pro's line out now and I get this very strange internal routing of the audio on one channel to other audio channels, basically doubling itself. It also does this when I drop in a loop from the loop browser.
    If anyone can tell me how to sort this problem I'd be really appreciative.
    I have one more issue also. I use EZ Drummer within Logic and want to mix each part of the kit separately. I've done the multichannel thing and then hit the plus sign in L8's mixer but all I get is a new aux channel. I've rescanned with the audio units manager but it does nothing, does anybody know how to fix this bug?
    Best,
    Alex

    AlexReid wrote:
    Hi Guys,
    Logic 8 has worked fine for over a year untill I used it with an Edirol firewire interface. I just have the sound coming out of the macbook pro's line out now and I get this very strange internal routing of the audio on one channel to other audio channels, basically doubling itself. It also does this when I drop in a loop from the loop browser.
    Make sure "Universal Track Mode" in Preferences/Audio is enabled.
    I have one more issue also. I use EZ Drummer within Logic and want to mix each part of the kit separately. I've done the multichannel thing and then hit the plus sign in L8's mixer but all I get is a new aux channel. I've rescanned with the audio units manager but it does nothing, does anybody know how to fix this bug?
    Alex, now set the Input of the newly created Aux track to one of the Multi-outs made available by EZDrummer.
    pancenter-

  • 3560 PBR including internal routes help

    I'm attempting to use PBR on a 3560 switch.  Everything seems to be working OK but we have some periodic CPU interupt spikes that are effecting performance.
    I have three vlans
    vlan 1 - 172.19.142.0/24
    vlan 2 - 172.20.142.0/24
    vlan 3 - 173.23.142.0/24
    route-map PBR permit 10
    match ip address 140
    set ip next-hop 192.168.250.2
    I'm trying to policy route all www and ssl traffic
    ip access-list 140 permit tcp any any eq www
    ip access-list 140 permit tcp any any eq 443
    However I have two problems
    1)I have internal web services, so I need www traffic from 172.23.142.0/24 ro route to 172.19.142.0/24 and this policy sends all www traffic out next hop of 192.168.250.2
    2)When I add to acl 140
    ip access-list 140 deny tcp 172.23.142.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.142.0 0.0.0.255 www
    The policy works as expected but CPU starts to spike.
    If I try to use 'set ip default next-hop XXXX' or change to 'route-map PBR deny 10' (for internal routed) the ip policy route-map pbr statement disappears from the vlan interface and cannot be re-added.  No errors are displayed, it's just like the command is ignored.
    I've looked at:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_tech_note09186a00807213f5.shtml#pbr
    Specifically
    •Do not match ACLs that permit packets destined for a local address
    •Do not match ACLs with deny ACEs
    I'm looking for a way to impliment PBR for selective traffic (www and 443), but keep the internal routing intact using the same protocols (www and 443).
    Any suggestions would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Tom

    I'm not entirely sure this will work but it is worth a try. if you can't use local subnets then you need to specify all possible internet addresses. The acl below uses wildcard masks to specify every possible internet address. Due to the way wildcard masks work all traffic between 172.16.x.x and 172.31.x subnets do not match the acl. if you wanted to be more specific to your subnets you could be but it would make the acl considerably longer. But as this whole range is private addressing it doesn't really matter or shouldn't.
    Also to keep the acl short it does allow traffic to the other private address ranges ie. 10.x.x.x and 192.168.x.x  but then so did your original acl. So you only need one permit statement in your route map with sets the next hop to 192.168.250.2.
    I have assumed that you do not have any http/https traffic between internal subnets that you actually want to policy route. If you do this acl would not match and therefore they would be routed using the normal routing table.
    permit tcp any 0.0.0.0 127.255.255.255  eq www   - covers all class A networks
    permit tcp any 0.0.0.0 127.255.255.255  eq ssl
    permit tcp any 128.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 eq www  -  128.0.0.0 -> 159.255.255.255
    permit tcp any 128.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 eq ssl
    permit tcp any 160.0.0.0 7.255.255.255 eq www -  160.0.0.0 -> 167.255.255.255
    permit tcp any 160.0.0.0 7.255.255.255 eq ssl
    permit tcp any 168.0.0.0 3.255.255.255 eq www    - 168.0.0.0 -> 171.255.255.255
    permit tcp any 168.0.0.0 3.255.255.255 eq ssl
    permit tcp any 172.0.0.0 0.15.255.255 eq www  - 172.0.0.0 -> 172.15.255.255
    permit tcp any 172.0.0.0 0.15.255.255 eq ssl
    permit tcp any 172.32.0.0 0.31.255.255 eq www - 172.32.0.0 -> 172.63.255.255
    permit tcp any 172.32.0.0 0.31.255.255 eq ssl
    permit tcp any 172.64.0.0 0.63.255.255 eq www - 172.64.0.0 -> 172.127.255.255
    permit tcp any 172.64.0.0 0.63.255.255 eq ssl
    permit tcp any 172.128.0.0 0.127.255.255 eq www  - 172.128.0.0 172.255.255.255
    permit tcp any 172.128.0.0 0.127.255.255 eq ssl
    permit tcp any 173.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 eq www - 173.0.0.0 -> 173.255.255.255
    permit tcp any 173.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 eq ssl
    permit tcp any 174.0.0.0 1.255.255.255 eq www  - 174.0.0.0 -> 175.255.255.255
    permit tcp any 174.0.0.0 1.255.255.255 eq ssl
    permit tcp any 176.0.0.0 15.255.255.255 eq www - 176.0.0.0 -> 191.255.255.255
    permit tcp any 176.0.0.0 15.255.255.255 eq ssl
    permit tcp any 192.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 eq www  - 192.0.0.0 -> 223.255.255.255
    permit tcp any 192.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 eq ssl
    Like i say no guarantees and i have no idea of what this will do to the switch in terms of CPU etc. but probably worth a try.
    Jon

  • Imac internal router problem

    We are using Bell Wimax to connect to the internet and due to their towers being down for 2 weeks, we had lost our internet connection. It is back up and running, however we no longer can connect wirelessly to the computer. I was using the imac as the router and have tried to reestablish a connection, however the other computers can't connect. They recognize and register the signal but won't join in. I have tried to reset the location and then redo the sharing, but again, it did not work.

    Welcome to the Apple Discussions!
    First off, the folks in the G5 forums may assist you better;
    Forum : Using your iMac G5
    You might make sure that your Audio MIDI Setup has not been reconfigured. I can't guarantee what is correct for a G5 PPC, just an Intel. The actual setting can be found in Apps/Utilities/Audio MIDI Setup;
    1. Audio Devices pane
    2. Built-in Output
    3. Audio Output
    Source = Internal Speakers
    Format = 44100.0 Hz 2ch - 24bit

  • Loss of audio after upgrade os x 10.7.5, reset PRAM, SMS, updated software and other recommendations i could find. Master volume sliders inactive in Audio Midi section. Can see sound bar responding it input on line in but is not being internally routed.

    Recently upgrade to OS x 10.7.5 resulted in loss of what appears to be internal communication of line in audio, and output. Have tired several remedies including resetting PRAM, SMS, updating all software, multiple Sound and Audio Midi applications adjustments to no avail. Also no audio is recognized on USB mixing board I tried as well, though Audio USB Codec was displayed. THe master volume sliders and other options are greyed out on Audio Midi application whn I try to troubleshoot that. Nothing external will play through computer speakers, but internal sounds and iTunes play normally.I made sure the audio sampling rates were default. Software issue or soundcard/hardware failure.?..Pullin my hair out!

    Might be corrupted sound preferences ...
    Open the Finder. From the Finder menu bar click Go > Go to Folder
    Type or copy paste the following;
    /Library/Preferences/Audio
    Click Go then move both .plist files from the Audio folder to the Trash.
    com.apple.audioDeviceSettings.pllist
    com.apple.audio.SystemSettings.plist
    Restart your Mac. See if that made a difference ...

  • WRT300n Internal Routing

    I just picked up the WRT300n and am having diffculties. I will describe my internal network:
    1 Windows 2003 server acting as Domain controller and DNS server at 192.168.1.175
    4 Workstations running XP on DHCP range 192.168.1.100 - 104
    WRT300n at 192.168.1.1
    The problem is that when I try to ping my server by name, it sends the traffic out on the internet and does not keep it internally. I can ping by IP and get to the internet fine. This setup worked fine with my cheap 802.11b WAP.
    Ok, where do I start?
    Thanks up front

    I guess I'm not understanding you. Here is the Ipconfig from a workstation:
    Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
            Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . : hsd1.co.comcast.net.
            Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Realtek RTL8139/810x Family Fast Ethernet NIC
            Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-10-DC-4D-D4-D5
            Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
            Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
            IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.160
            Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
            Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
            DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
            DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.175
                                                68.87.85.98
                                                68.87.69.146
            Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Wednesday, October 17, 2007 8:09:18 PM
            Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Thursday, October 18, 2007 8:09:18 PM
    The first DNS entry is for my internal server. The server is handling dns and has an A record of "server" and the correct IP. He is forwarding all other domains to 68.87.85.98.

  • Routing issue with dual Ethernet NICs - Internal/External Configuration under Windows 8.1 - what am I doing wrong ?

    I have a PC hosting Windows 8.1, attached to two Networks. One leads to the internet - and uses the private IP address (172.*)  the other is purely internal (also using the private address 198.*) but,  has no internet connectivity.  I'm finding
    that if I don't disable my internal NIC, I can't access any internet sites. Is this a bug, or have I not done something correctly.
    I have also, a Windows 7 PC, attached to the same Networks, and it exhibits no issues when connecting to either the internet or to internal locations.
    (Both are Enterprise builds, though only across a Windows for Workgroups network).
    Can anyone tell me what I need to be doing with Windows 8.1 please, to make both internal & external network connectivity work as is the case with Windows 7 ?
    I'm only running IPv4, and both Wired Networks have at their respective ends, Routers that support DHCP & NAT. Though the internal Router's external port is not connected to anything.
    Thanks in advance...

    Hi,
    Can you tell me what you have tried so far and how did you set?
    Firstly please update all network adapter driver.
    After that, do the following:
    1. Open the Command Prompt (Admin).
    2. Run "Ipconfig /all" to check your nics IP information.
    3. Use route command tell the computer which interface you want the packets to leave from.
    Assuming Network A is...
    10.10.11.0 /24
    Router is 10.10.10.1
    and Network B is...
    10.10.12.0 /24
    Router is 10.10.10.2
    then use this command:
    route add 10.10.11.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1 -p
    route add 10.10.12.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.2 -p
    Hope this helps.
    Karen Hu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Adding additional internal IP route

    I have an internal router to connect to a different network. I want to be able to connect to devices in that network. I've selected Advanced->Routing and added a new route. I can now ping the addresses on that network, but can make no connections to them. Adding static routes to my PC allows the connections, but I'd rather the router handle the connections. Does anyone know of a way to allow those connections.

    So you're able to ping from a host on VLAN1 to the vlan2?
    Also are you using these instructions?
    [PDF]
    Creating an Ethernet VLAN - Actiontec
    support.actiontec.com/doc_files/Creating_an_Ethernet_VLAN.pdf

  • Channels and busses randomly re-routed in Logic 9?

    Is this happening to any one but me?  It's kind of difficult to artculate but here goes.  Scenario:  I have several Logic sessions (projects started a while back) that all have similar random issues.  The projects were started as new blank or from a template.  They've been updated, saved, re-opened and re-saved and re-opened dozens of times.  Over time, I've added new tracks, Aux sends and returns (aux channels w busses assigned).  There are plug-ins on all the tracks, some Logics some Waves or other vendors.  I've edited and comped - all the types of normal updates.  The tracks contain audio regions, loops, MIDI instruments, stuff like Superior Drummer or EX synths.  I have backups and versions of all these versions.  Some were started with a MOTU travelor, some with an MR816, and I've added a UA 4-710d recently.  This behavior spans all of it. 
    I'm now mixing.  Every time I re-open one of these sessions (projects), I find more bizarre, seemingly random changes.  There's a stereo audio drum track- it contains a mixture of audio regions, identical copies; others are unique regions (a track of drum loop patterns with a few fills, for example).  When I last saved this session the track was fine, stereo, all regions played back.  The next time I opend the file the "fills" regions were silent.  I opened them in the Finder and they soun fine.  OR the track is no longer Stereo and the sound is only on one side.  Or the Inspector to the left of the Arrange Window is blank, and right clicking on the channel reveals that the track (let's say "track 2 drums") is "Controlled by track 19," which is a MIDI track.  My solution is to create a new track and re-copy the slient regions from the finder. Now I have two drum tracks.       
    I set up three aux busses, one for Delay, one as an ambience compressor, and one with Space Desgner. I re-open a session and the Aux returns no longer show the signal coming from a Buss, but now from an input.  I reassign them and I'm ok.  The plug-ins still same as before.
    But this rerouting is very confusing. Nothing changed in my hardware from the last to the next session.  For me, even if hardware is changed the internal routing should not. I can see about inputs but not an Aux or Stereo mix bus.  What happens when I take my session to a studio to mix?  They have a totally unique system and configuration.  I was advised to turn off and disconnect everything external in order to get to a vanilla configuartion.  So did so and used Apples internal line in (even though I'm no longer recording) and The headphone out.  (Mac Pro 8-core).  Same thing.  The tracks are still moved.  I even see tracks that are nto stereo nor mono.  There a tracks with no stereo assignment at all (below the strip meter, which is single nto separated), even a track showing two circles NOT overlapping, one is dark and the other open / white.  I right-click and see the options Stereo, Mono, Surround.  sound comes out one side. Bizarre!
    My only way to deal with this - since I've got a month invested is to create a new track for each of these- and it's working so far.  But I can't imagine haiving to keep doing this.  I trashed my Logic Preferences. I asked about a Logic cache - none such exists.  If I was working in Cubase, for instance, I'd see a VST Connections Window.  And one for Devices. I could completely reassign everything.  Is there no such control in Logic?  Is this a Logic issue or Core Audio?
    I have a radio spot music bed that was starte in Logic a few versions back.  I've noticed similar behavior- and solutions - a few times.  A guitar track goes silent. I copy it to a new track and it's ok, and then a MIDI drum track goes south.  I thought this was because it was started on a differnt Mac.  But then I think - so what?  These projects should be futre compatible- even if it takes some re-sassignments. 
    Can't figure out why this happens or how to fix it. 
    Anyone have any thoughts or ideas - or similar behavior?       

    Last things first... Sorry, no, I can't read crash reports. I'm better at reading Japanese, honestly. However, I've encountered the same error before:
    EXCBADACCESS (SIGBUS)
    ...and if you do a google search you'll see that you're not alone, and, that it's not limited to working in Logic. Of the first hits on google someone said that it's a sign of bad RAM, but there were many other links to investigate so I would take that with a grain of salt for now. Maybe do a search for that yourself and see if anything posted on the web hits home for you.
    EXS24 settings -- I just wanted to see if VM was on or off.
    Interesting that it doesn't always happen. OK, are there particular libraries (3rd party, Logic factory stuff, etc.) that seem to perpetrate the crashes?
    In the song(s) you're experiencing this in, are they already very sample-intensive, lots of sampler instruments loaded up? The reason I ask is that Logic has been known to go "huh?" and quit unexpectedly if you attempt to load up more samples than can fit into Logic's RAM footprint.
    Another test... does this happen in a brand new, empty song (such as the Explore/Empty template)?
    There are more things you can do to try and narrow down the problem, but rather than overwhelm you with stuff I'll stop here. Post back with your answers/results and we can take it from there.

  • Asa 5505 site to site VPN between A to B site, then B site MPLS to internal network

    Dear all
    I am setting up site to site VPN between two site A to B site.  Two local site of A and B are connected fine.  however for my site B have another internal MPLS to other site.  The connection fine from LAN A all the way to LAN B MPLS router, but it cannot be connect to other MPLS site.  If I did the MPLS traceroute from other site.  It can be reached of LAN B internal router.  Therefore, I am confusing which part of my configuration go wrong and any document for my reference.  Thank you very much.
    Local LAN A (5505 ASA)---------(5505 ASA) Local LAN B-----------B Internal router---------B MPLS router-------------other site.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    Dear Harish
    for LAN B MPLS.  All 11.20.0.0/16 will route to LAN B internal router 10.14.128.252
    If traceroute from other 11.0.0.0 site to 11.20.128.250, it can reach until LAN B ASA 11.14.127.223
    11.20.128.250                        11.14.128.223                           11.14.128.252           11.14.128.253              11.0.0.0
    Local LAN A (5505 ASA)---------(5505 ASA) Local LAN B-----------B Internal router---------B MPLS router-------------other site.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    if traceroute from 10.20.0.0, it can reach until LAN B MPLS router 11.14.128.253
    For config file post.  Can I have your email address to direct send to you.  Thank you very much.

  • I tried creating a startup backup via Disk Utility.  There wasn't enough space and now I have no internal disk space. How do I fix this?

    I used DIsk Utility to create a startup backup clone for the first time yesterday.  I cloned it to my internal drive on my Mac.  I let it run all night and when I woke up this morning it showed it as failed (not enough disk space).  Now when I boot up my Mac, it showed a warning at the login screen (not enough disk space at startup).  I do not have an external hard drive (which is why I chose to backup internally).  Do I need to purchase one? 
    It still allows me to log in.  When I open Finder and look at my internal drive, it shows less than 100.00 MB space available.  I tried deleting a bunch of old files and stripped needless apps.  However, it keeps showing my computer as having less than 100 MB of storage. 
    Is there a way to find the failed clone backup and delete it?  I tried looking in Spotlight for the backup clone (I named it 4-21-14.dmg).  I cannot find the file.  I was hoping to backup my files so I can install OS Mavericks on my computer (mid-2010 Macbook Pro), but I do not have enough free space. 

    I solved the problem by deleting over 100 gb of files and apps.  I would have rather not gone that route, but having less than 100 MB of storage is an unacceptable headache to deal with.  Now I have to decide on whether to try again with the backup internally route or risk it and download/install Mavericks.

  • Branch office setup with L3 switch and router with IOS security

    Hello,
    I am in the process of putting together a small branch office network and I am in need of some design advise. The network will support about 10-15 workstations/phones, 3-4 printers, and 4-5 servers. In addition we will eventually have up to 25-30 remote users connecting to the servers via remote access VPN, and there will also be 2-3 site-to-site IPSec tunnels to reach other branches.
    I have a 2911 (security bundle) router and 3560 IP Base L3 switch to work with. I have attached a basic diagram of my topology. My initial design plan for the network was to setup separate VLANs for workstation, phone, printer, and server traffic. The 3560 would then be setup with SVIs to perform routing between VLANs. The port between the router and switch would be setup as a routed port, and static routes would be applied on the switch and router as necessary. The thought behind this was that I'd be utilizing the switch backplane for VLAN routing instead instead of doing router-on-a-stick.
    Since there is no firewall between the switch and router my plan was to setup IOS firewalling on the router. From what I am reading ZBF is my best option for this. What I was hoping for was a way to set custom policies for each VLAN, but it seems that zones are applied per interface. Since the interface between the router and switch is a routed interface, not a trunk/subinterface(s), it doesn't seem like there would be a way for me to use ZBF to control traffic on different VLANs. From what I am gathering I would have to group all of my internal network into one zone, or I would have to scrap L3 switching all together and do router-on-a-stick if I want to be able to set separate policies for each VLAN. Am I correct in my thinking here?
    I guess what I am getting at is that I really don't want to do router-on-a-stick if I have a nice switch backplane to do all of the internal routing. At the same time I obviously need some kind of firewalling done on the router, and since different VLANs have different security requirements the firewalling needs to be fairly granular.
    If I am indeed correct in the above thinking what would be the best solution for my scenario? That is, how can I setup this network so that I am utilizing the switch to do L3 routing while also leveraging the firewall capabilities of IOS security?
    Any input would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Austin

    Thanks for the input.
    1. I agree, since I have only three to four printers, they need not be in a separate VLAN. I simply was compartmentalizing VLANs by function when I initially came up with the design.
    2. Here's a little more info on the phone situation. The phones are VoIP. The IP PBX is on premise, but they are currently on a completely separate ISP/network. The goal in the future is to converge the data and voice networks and setup PBR/route maps to route voice traffic out the voice ISP and data traffic out the other ISP. This leads up to #3. 
    3. The reason a router was purchased over a firewall was that ASA's cannot handle routing and dual ISPs very well. PBR is not supported at all on an ASA, and dual ISPs can only be setup in an active/standby state. Also, an ASA Sec+ does not have near the VPN capabilities that the 2911 security does. The ASA Sec+ would support only 25 concurrent IPSec connections while the 2911 security is capable of doing an upwards of 200 IPSec connections.
    Your point about moving the SVI's to a firewall to perform filtering between VLANs makes sense, however, wouldn't this be the same thing as creating subinterfaces on a router? In both cases you are moving routing from the switch backplane to the firewall/routing device, which is what I am trying to avoid.  

  • I am using BT Broadband home hub and want to use my time machine - Can I turn the wireless router off in TM?

    Hi,
    I have BT home hub which is now my main router in the house.  I also have Apple TV which works off the router and a network adapter around the house which is perfect for all my needs.  However, I also have a time machine but haven't used it for a while now as it's internal router overrides my current network which causes problems.
    Being that i'm not very 'technical' I was hoping someone could give me a  'guide for dummies' instruction on how to turn off the wireless signal inside my time capsule without messing up the BT router?
    Many thanks in advance
    Alex

    Thanks guys,
    Sorry, just to clarify, I need to connect the ethernet cable to my home hub and my TC first before i can do this?
    And once i've done this will my stuff be backed up via the cable or wireless?
    I know these are probably very stupid questions but like I said, i'm a div when it comes to this stuff!
    Alex

Maybe you are looking for