Internet Base Client Setup

I'm trying to figure out what is needed for Internet Base Client Management. After researching, it looks like I need to create a certificate from a server. Would this be the SCCM server I'm creating this from or an Enterprise CA Server that we would have
to stand up? And do I have to put my SCCM Server on the DMZ also? I'm planning on setting up one primary site server to manage internal and external clients. Also, anyone have a good step by step tutorial that I can use for IBCM from start to finish? I've
never dealth with CA's/PKI's. Thanks for the help.

Hi,
Please refer to the link below:
SCCM 2012 Internet based client management
http://www.systemcenterdudes.com/internet-based-client-management/
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Similar Messages

  • Internet Based client support with Existing PKI Environment

    Hi Team,
    I have a question.... My Environment is on SCCM 2007 environment and there is a requirement which has come-up to support internet based clients.
    My Hierarchy is : ( All in Mixed Mode )
    1 Central
    2 Primary
    5 Secondary under each Primary
    Now to support Internet based client this is what I have proposed. To add another Primary on LAN for Native Mode and  its Site System server in DMZ with MP, DP and SUP role. Only This site system server would be internet facing to support clients.
    Now to support internet based clients... I would have to move my Central from Mixed to Native mode and then New Primary server to Native mode. Please let me know if you agree with this design or you suggest another one.
    Now my company has already existing PKI environment setup on non-windows platform. I'm aware of the fact that SCCM 2007 would support version 3 of the x.509 certificate format. When I reached the PKI team they mentioned that they only sign the certificates
    and do not issue one.. They said that your application / server should generate the certificate which I can send them and they sign.
    Now I'm not able to understand how this would happen. As per my understanding SCCM cannot generate the certificate for PKI team to sign. 
    From OS perspective, via IIS we can get the certificate generated, but not sure if that is the right was to do that.
    Please suggest how can I get these certificates generated for my SCCM environment and client machines to use.
    Thanks,
    Sam

    First, you really should look at moving to ConfigMgr 2012 to make your life easier and simplify this scenario quite a bit.
    As for certs, you need more than an IIS cert, you need a unique cert for each and every managed device that could communicate via the Internet. If your PKI team cannot accommodate this, then their PKI solution is feeble and weak and you should consider implementing
    a Microsoft PKI.
    Also, it's incorrect to say that a PKI only signs certs, they do create and issue certs; these are based upon a cert request you give them which effectively contains some meta-data and the public key that will be included in the cert that they
    create, sign, and issue (honestly, not trying to throw stones, but if they truly believe that's what a PKI does, then you're never going to get what you need from them because they don't even know what they do). This is impractical to do for every managed
    client though.
    There is also a special cert type called a document signing cert that must be issued that contains a non-standard subject.
    Ultimately, the PKI must be able to issue certificates based on the requirements listed at
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb680733.aspx and of course you need a method to get those certs to both the site systems hosting the roles, the site server, and the managed clients.
    If they can't give you this (which at the very least they think they can't based on your comments), then no, you won't be able to use this in-place PKI.
    Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com

  • Internet Explorer 11 setup cannot recognize it's own /update-no switch?

    Building a package with the Internet Explorer 11 Administration Kit (Internal Distribution) spits out
    IE11-Setup-Full.exe (which seems to be an IExpress setup) and
    IE11-Setup-Full.msi. IE11-Setup-Full.exe does not recognize the
    /update-no switch. Is there any way either of these can be silently deployed
    without checking for updates?

    I've seen the command line reference.
    If I pass /? to IE11-Setup-Full.exe (described as a Win32 Cabinet Self-Extractor), an
    Internet Explorer 11 Setup dialog appears that displays this information:
       Command line options:
       /Q -- Quiet modes for package,
       /T:<full path> -- Specifies temporary working folder,
       /C -- Extract files only to the folder when used also with /T.
       /C:<Cmd> -- Override Install Command defined by author.
    Extracting IE11-Setup-Full.exe creates these files:
       BRANDING.CAB
       ieadvpack.dll
       ieakcust.dll
       iedkcs32.dll
       IE-REDIST.EXE
       iesetup.cif
       IE-Setup.cmd
       iesetup.ini
       INSTALL.INS
    If I pass /? to IE-REDIST.EXE, the Microsoft HTML Application Host produces an
    Internet Explorer 11 Setup Command Line Switches window that displays the command line switches and their descriptions for Setup Modes (/quiet) and Help, Setup (/update-no), Restart (/norestart) and Miscellaneous Options.
    Yes, I could use the extracted files from the customized Internet Explorer 11 package, but according to Microsoft Knowledge Base article 197147, IExpress packages support (as evidenced by the supported switches reported by IE11-Setup-Full.exe) switch
    /c:path (specifies the UNC path and name of the Setup .inf or .exe file). In this article it is noted that you "can use the /c:path switch to pass parameters (switches) to the Setup program or specify a different Setup program for the package."
    This example is given:
       Ie6setup <IExpress switches> /c:" ie6wzd <Internet Explorer Setup switches>"
    I've tried this:
       <ParentFolderPath>IE11-Setup-Full.exe /q:a /c:"IE-REDIST.EXE /closeprograms /quiet /update-no"
    But that doesn't work either. I'll probably try using the extracted custom package source later today so that I can access that
    /update-no switch.

  • SCCM Client Agent Deployment - Internet based client scenario

    Hi There,
    I need to deploy SCCM 2012 client agent and certificate to the machines not connected to the corporate LAN. I know that SCCM agent and certificate needs to be installed manually on them ( or via Group Policy ).... but here I'm talking about 2000 internet
    based machines.
    Can you please let me know the enterprise level best practice to capture those 2000 internet based machines.
    50% of these machines may not come on corporate network for very long time....so cannot capture them by Group Policy... How to capture those machines.... Has anyone worked on a solution to create some kind of portal etc...whose link we can provide to the
    users via email for them to just click and that installs both SCCM client agent and certificate....just a thought.
    Regards,
    Sam

    There is no best practice as that would imply that every organization is the same and should do it the same way.
    Ultimately, this challenge is unique to your organization -- not the specific ConfigMgr details, but how best to get it done within the resources and security posture of your organization.
    If your users are local admins and you have a VPN solution, then you can potentially just send them batch files to run (that install a cert and install the client agent) when they are connected via VPN. You could potentially expose both via an HTTP download
    and the CA web issuance pages also or using certutil (assuming the user has local admin permissions again). There simply are too many variables that are unique and specific to your environment to be able to describe any sort of complete solution.
    Ultimately, it comes down to two parts, neither of which is overly complicated (or magic):
    1. Request and install client auth certificate.
      - Must be done as local admin
      - Can be automated using certutil and PowerShell
    2. Install ConfigMgr client agent
      - Must be done as local admin
      - Must be initiated by running ccmsetup (with appropriate switches and properties)
      - Must have access to rest of client setup files either locally, via the Internet DP, or Internet MP
      - Must be able to communicate with MP
    I have seen folks publish scripts for this and web pages even so a little web searching may turn one of these up.
    Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com

  • Email client setup

    I am using Firefox with Thunderbird as the email client.I need to know the comcast parameters for the Thunderbird setup eg server type, port, security settings.Can you help

    Here you go---------------
    http://customer.comcast.com/help-and-support/internet/email-client-programs-with-xfinity-email/

  • \\SERVER\Clients\Setup\setup.exe with Windows Vista Error

    I added the first Vista client to an SBS 2003, SP1 domain.  Until now, all clients were WinXP, SP2.  Office 2003 is installed on the XP clients, and the Vista client, which may not be pertinent to this problem.
    As is normal, "\\SERVER\Clients\Setup\setup.exe /s SERVER" is executed when a user logs on to any domain client.  On the Vista client, I always get the dialog -- regardless of the account privilege -- asking for permission to run Setup.exe.  It is annoying.  Occasionally, the Program Compatiblity Assistant will appear and advise there's a known compatiblity issue with Setup.exe.  It points to KB article 926505 for resolution.  The title of the KB is, "Windows Small Business Server 2003: Windows Vista and Outlook 2007 compatibility update."
    When I run the SBS2003SP1-KB926505-X86-ENU.EXE fix, I get the error:  "This update cannot be installed.  Either it is already installed as part of an existing service pack, or it requires a more recent service pack.  For more information, see the systems requirements on the download page."
    I installed Windows Server 2003 SP2 and run the KB926505 fix, but I get the same error  "This update cannot be installed.  Either it is already installed as part of an existing service pack" After a reboot of te SBS server the same  problem on the Vista client, I always get the dialog -- regardless of the account privilege -- asking for permission to run Setup.exe.  It is annoying.  Occasionally, the Program Compatiblity Assistant will appear and advise there's a known compatiblity issue with Setup.exe.  It points to KB article 926505 for resolution.
    The problem is Windows Vista Business, because all windows XP clients have no problem at all.

    PNP,
    You do not say whether if you accept the permission dialog whether the setup continues or not, but the short answer to the question revolves around UAC.
    Remember that EVERY user (except the actual Administrator account) has only Standard user rights regardless of group.  When a task that requires Admin rights is executed, one of three things will happen: 1) If you are THE Administrator, then your task will continue.  2) If you have Admin rights, you will be prompted that a process is trying to use elevated rights and ask for permission, or 3) If you are a Standard user, you will either be denied flatly or prompted to supply credentials.  Which of these happen depend on GPO settings, but the default is to prompt.
    In any event, I believe that this is what you are running into, and is one of the big feature improvements in Vista.  Yes, it can be a bit annoying (Try deleting an "All Users" icon from the Start Menu!) but is there to place one more barrier between virus and malware writers and your OS.
    If it's TOO annoying to bear, you can turn off UAC by going into your profile and disabling it. (It requires Admin rights, of course. )  It is not recommended as you do a very effective job or nutering the Vista Security Model by doing so.
    If it, of course, your choice.  we IT Admins have a lot more issues with this than the standard user, but for me, I gladly take the tradeoff because I worry a lot less about those few I HAVE to give Admin rights to.
    Good luck!

  • Internet Based Clients and Native Mode

    Hi guys,
    I have a question.... We have SCCM 2007 SP2 running in mixed mode in the environment. Now we plan to support internet based clients. Here is the current Hierarchy in mixed mode.
    1 Central Server
    1 Primary Server
    3 Secondary servers under above Primary Server
    Now as the requirement is to support internet based clients and want them to support on office LAN as well when they come to the office....this is what I would be doing : ( Theoretically I know, I need the practical steps to achieve that )
    1. Get all the 3 PKI Certificates : Site Server Signing, Web Server, Client agent.
    2. Make sure all the required ports are opened in-between Intranet <->DMZ AND DMZ <-> Internet
    3. Migrate Central server from Mixed to Native Mode.
    4. Install another Primary Server on Intranet in Native mode.
    5. Create a site system server connected to newly created Native Primary Site in the DMZ zone with these roles installed : MP, SUP and DP.
    6. Re-install all the SCCM clients in the environment with the command-line so that they can be supported on both internet and intranet.
    7. Make sure internet clients are able to connect DMZ site system server via internet.
    Please let me know if I'm missing something here and let me know the practical steps to achieve this. 
    Request you not to share Microsoft technet link for the same. Please share some step-by-step practical document etc.. to achieve this.
    Thanks,
    Sam

    1. This is incorrect. You need more than a single web server cert and client cert. You need a unique server auth cert for *every* one of your systems hosting a client role like the MP, DP, and SUP. Also, you need a unique client auth cert for each and *every*
    client that may/will connect via the Internet.
    4. Standing up a whole extra site just to support IBCM is a bit overkill. It does allow you to keep your "main" primary site in mixed mode, but it does add some overhead and cost and is not technically necessary.
    6. Incorrect. You only need to reinstall clients that will be configured as "Internet-only". Intranet clients should pick up the internet facing roles via policy. You can verify this by checking locationservices.log on the clients after they are successfully
    communicating and the Internet facing roles are stood up and healthy.
    You've made no account above for the CDP or CRL checking. This is a major stumbling block for many folks.
    Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com

  • Datapump - in a  client setup.

    Hi all,
    I have only oracle client setup installed in my machine ,I wanna take a schema backup from the server which is in remote location via datapump is there any way to get the dump file in my machine ?
    for example,
    exp scott/tiger@live file=d:/exp.dmp
    how can i do this using datapump ? without specifying the directory parameter.

    Satish.J wrote:
    Hi all,
    I have only oracle client setup installed in my machine ,I wanna take a schema backup from the server which is in remote location via datapump is there any way to get the dump file in my machine ?
    for example,
    exp scott/tiger@live file=d:/exp.dmp
    how can i do this using datapump ? without specifying the directory parameter.That is not possible

  • How to implement a internet radio client by j2me

    Can anyone please help me to implement a internet radio client application for mobile device which will do audio streaming while playing mp3 files?

    sazib wrote:
    Can anyone please help me Sure thing. You go first.
    [_How to ask questions the smart way_|http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]
    db

  • Support for Internet based client Management - SCCM 2012

    Hi There,
    My Company wants to go for Internet based client Management in SCCM 2012 SP1 R2 and here is the design I'm proposing. I'm getting a bit confused at one point and need suggestion....
    Everything would work on HTTPS ( PKI Certificate based )... LAN and Internet.
    1 Primary ( with non-client facing roles installed ) on LAN with two site systems.
    - One Site System configured for INTRANET support only with MP, DP and SUP -> To support LAN users ( Allow
    Intranet-only connections )
    - One Site System configured for INTERNET support only with MP, DP and SUP -> To support Internet users ( Allow 
        Internet-only connections )
    The INTERNET facing site system is in DMZ network connected to parent Primary via Firewall.
    We want internet clients to talk to ONLY DMZ SCCM Site System and no connection to corporate LAN. We cannot open any ports for internet based clients to LAN.
    If this is the supported scenario, then why we need to put the Internet FQDN in the Primary server Site System property. This server would not be available to internet. It should only be my DMZ SCCM server client should connect for MP, DP and SUP and only
    this DMZ server should be accessible to client over internet.
    Also, what least ports should be opened between :
    - Parent Primary and its internet facing site system kept in DMZ
    - DMZ Site system and internet clients.
    Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
    Sam

    The FQDN has only to be specified on the Internet facing site system. You can leave this field blank on the primary site Server.
    Ports to Open:
    Internet --> DMZ Site Server:
    TCP Port 443
    TCP Port 80, if Fallback Status Point is installed
    DMZ Site Server --> Primary Site:
    TCP 135, 49152-65535
    TCP 445
    TCP 135, 24158 (fixed with
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb219447(v=vs.85).aspx )
    TCP 80, 443
    If you have some other roles installed, please consult this page:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh427328.aspx
    Cheers,
    Thomas Kurth
    Netree AG, System Engineer
    Blog:
    http://netecm.netree.ch/blog | Twitter:
    | LinkedIn:
    | Xing:
    Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.

  • Internet Based Client Management Design Question

    Hi,
    I read many articles and many forum posts about IBCM design possibilities. I want to make sure I am on the right path, so I would like to mention about what I have currently in my environment and how I will change it. Please let me know if something is wrong
    with my plannings for IBCM.
    Currently I have one SCCM2012 R2 primary site server and one database server. We dont have
    public key infrastructure at the moment , so communication is via HTTP. We dont have DMZ either. I would like to make my internal SCCM site server reachable from intranet and internet
    without installing any other site server or MP,DP,SUP point. The article below says that is possible. I will implement the scenario1 in that article.
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrteam/archive/2012/05/25/system-center-2012-configuration-manager-r-i-p-native-mode.aspx
    So, I guess
    1.I need to create
    public key infrastructure.
    2.Public DNS registration for site server's internet FQDN
    3.Firewall Settings from internet to site server
    After those 3 steps, my client will connect from intranet when they are in the office and they will also be able to connect from internet when they are outside of our network. Can you please verify whether this planning is correct or not? If you know any
    step by step IBCM implementation article that I can use , can you please give me the link?
    Yavuz Selim Atmaca

    Very high level those are indeed the right steps at this moment. Just keep in mind that this definitely is not the most secure solution.
    I created a blog post about some important configuration steps:
    http://www.petervanderwoude.nl/post/five-key-configuration-steps-for-implementing-internet-based-clients-in-configmgr-2012/
    On a side-note, if your going to build a PKI anyway, you might want to think about DirectAccess instead of Internet clients.
    My Blog: http://www.petervanderwoude.nl/
    Follow me on twitter: pvanderwoude

  • Internet Based Client Updates

    Hi,
    We have SCCM 2012 R2 installed, with IBCM enabled. These clients are able to switch between intranet and internet fine.
    Updates work internally and externally fine too. We only have 1 SUP configured for intranet access only, and the Internet facing server is there as a DP and MP for clients to check in and report in etc. This enables us to see if any machines have viruses
    and what software they have installed etc
    Now, the problem...
    Our mobile workforce all use aircards with a data limit. We need to be able to report on these, and for them to get updates, but only from our DPs, NOT from windows updates, which is what happens by default when a client switches to internet based.
    This is an extract from a technet article:
    New in System Center 2012 Configuration Manager, when you have a software update point that is configured to accept connections from the Internet, Configuration Manager Internet-based clients on the Internet always scan against this software update point,
    to determine which software updates are required. However, when these clients are on the Internet, they first try to download the software updates from Microsoft Update, rather than from an Internet-based distribution point. Only if this fails, will they then
    try to download the required software updates from an Internet-based distribution point. Clients that are not configured for Internet-based client management never try to download the software updates from Microsoft Update, but always use Configuration Manager
    distribution points.
    We need to able to turn this off, so they do not get updates from windows updates and consume all their data allowance.
    On our SCCM 2007 server, we simply added a SUP internally, an internet facing DP/MP and when they were on the intranet they got updates and when they were on the internet they did not as we did not distribute the packages to that DP, but got them the next
    time they were at one of our sites...
    We need to replicate this functionality.
    Can you advise how to do this in SCCM 2012?
    Many thanks

    You are welcome to file a design change request (DCR) on connect.microsoft.com.
    Are these system Win 8.1? If so, then your scenario actually shouldn't be an issue because Win 8.1 can detect metered connections and ConfigMgr client settings can be set so that they do not use metered data connections.
    Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com | @jasonsandys

  • Internet Based Client Management - upgrade clients

    Hi.
    I have a customer, who wants to deploy an SCCM site and Internet Based clients. Main purpose is to patch manage the clients.
    I have one concern though - the certificate and client deployment AND the ongoing upgrade of clients.
    I believe, we will have to deploy certificates from the internal PKI and install the clients manually/scripted - right?
    How about upgrading clients when a CU is installed on the SCCM-server? Can Internet Based clients automatically upgrade or will we have to manually install every time a new client is available?
    Thanks in advance!
    /Michael

    The certificate doesn't have to be of the internal PKI it can come from anywhere as long as it can be used to authenticate the client.
    When you're dealing with Internet-only clients then yes the client needs to be manually/ scripted installed to specifically provide the client with the right information.
    Once the client is installed the normal CU packages can be used to upgrade the clients.
    My Blog: http://www.petervanderwoude.nl/
    Follow me on twitter: pvanderwoude

  • Manage System Center Endpoint Protection (SCEP) policies for Internet-based clients

    Hi,
    I've recently change my SCCM configuration in order to allow internet-based clients registered in our domain to communicate with our primary site server. The objectives were to let us manage the SCEP policies of these clients and receive alerts
    when they're infected even when they are on the road, so not connected to the local network.
    Now, everything seems to be in place; PKI certificates for server and client, the DNS is configured, firewall route too...but I still cannot update the policies of my client when it's not connected to the local network.
    I'm able to reach my primary site from my client when connected outside the network, but the policies won't update until I connect to the local network.
    Is it actually possible to manage the policies and receive alerts from internet-based clients like I'm trying to do?
    Thank you very much for your help

    It's going to come down to log checking at this point to find where the failure is happening or the connection is not happening.
    Initiate a machine policy refresh and watch the two logs noted above.
    CAS.log may also be helpful as well as locationservices.log and clientlocation.log.
    Try deploying an app as well and watch the logs.
    Also, if the client is not properly getting policy, there's no way for it to know that you disabled client CRL checking on the site.
    Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com
    Ok so now I see an error in clientlocation.log that might be the cause of my problem.
    [Domain joined client is in Internet]
    [Rotating internet management point, new management point is : SERVER.DOMAIN.COM ...
    [Unable to retrieve AD forest + domain membership] <- Pretty sure this is related to my issue
    I guess it's because my AD schema is not extended, is that right?
    EDIT: I thought this was the issue, but the AD schema seems to be extended already. Any idea of what could cause this error?
    EDIT: Do I need to open ports in order for my client to be able to reach the AD or something? I thought that was the MP's job once we granted him full control access on the AD. Am I wrong?

  • Internet Based Clients via F5 Big-IP load balancer

    Hi Guys,
    Please help with below question....
    We have the requirement to support internet based clients...we have a proper MS PKI infra in-place. The SCCM design is like this : Primary Server is on corporate LAN and I have attached a site system server which is in DMZ network ( Say ABC Zone ). Now as
    per my knowledge DMZ SCCM Site System server should be accessible to clients over internet connection and to make this happen, FQDN of site systems that support Internet-based client management must be registered as host entries on public DNS servers.
    Now the twist is... as per our company policy we cannot make that SCCM Site system server directly available on internet... Network team is saying there is another DMZ zone ( Say PQR Zone ) where they have F5 Big-IP load balancer which are internet facing
     ( HTTPS ). Now they are saying that our SCCM clients should hit those devices and then internally re-direct to our SCCM site system server kept in ABC Zone.
    VeriSign certificates will be used to encrypt in-coming network traffic to the F5 Big-IP Load Balancers configured as ADFS reverse proxy servers residing in the PQR Zone.
    Is this scenario supported ? Please let me know what alternates we can have to avoid our SCCM server not directly facing to internet.
    Thanks,
    Sam 

    Hi Jason,
    Thanks for your quick and prompt reply as always. My answers in BOLD...
    First a question, you said "we have a proper MS PKI infra in-place". Does this mean you have a CDP exposed to the Internet or is an OCSP responder Internet accessible? If not, you will have issues although this can be overcome by disabling CRL checking
    on the clients, that does lower your security posture. With "Proper PKI infra" I meant... they have if available already and supporting SCCM 2007 environment with it...but not supporting internet based clients in SCCM 2007. They implemented PKI there
    just for better security. At present PKI CRL server is on internal network and the assumption is that, machines will also VPN-in the corporate network for CRL and certificate renewal when required...at some point in time.
    To your real question here, is the F5 bridging or can it be set to pass-through? Pass-through is generally easier. Ultimately though, ConfigMgr doesn't care as long as the traffic gets to the site system hosting the roles. The main difference will be with the
    certificates used by each component. With bridging, the F5 will terminate the SSL traffic and then initiate a new SSL stream to the site system.
    This is all pretty transparent to ConfigMgr and the client as long as the certs used are configured with the proper SANs and the F5 properly passes the traffic along.
    I don't think Network team would allow 'pass-through' and would go for 'bridging' option. Can you please let me know the steps I need to follow to configure bridging in-between F5 Balancers and SCCM site system server...bottom line is...our SCCM clients
    should be able to communicate to our site server to get the MP, SUP and DP service. I'm not clear with the statement I underlined in above para.
    Is using a third-party product like an F5 supported by Microsoft. No not explicitly. They rarely support anyone else's technology. Is the scenario in general supported? Yes, however Microsoft only provides guidance for doing so in conjunction with TMG/ISA.
    If you search the web for "internet based client management bridge" you'll get lots of hits. Most (if not all) will be for ConfigMgr 2007 but they are still applicable.
    Not able to find much fruitful data... Can you please provide me with good links which would help me clear this technically.
    Now, if your F5 is set to pass-through, then there's not much extra to do at all assuming the traffic is routed properly
    THANKS AGAIN for your help in this regard.
    Sam

Maybe you are looking for

  • Running a java program in the background

    I'm designing a network remote control system in java. I was wondering does anyone know if it is possible to run an application at the log in screen in windows 2000. There is no GUI and no command prompt. paddy

  • Lost all photos in iPhoto! Help!

    Help! All my old photos in iPhoto library have vanished! Recently, I imported some new photos from my Canon camera into my iPhoto library but prior to doing that an option box appeared and I can't remember the wording exactly but it asked me where I

  • HD AVI import too short

    Hi, We use a Digital Rapids HD capture system to capture HD movies on a PC using the 8bit uncompressed AVI format. We tend to capture each movie in at least two parts for keep file size below 500GB. We then use these part 1 and part 2 uncompressed HD

  • HR Org/Users  ERP- SRM- what gets replicated (and what not)

    I'm working with a client on a SRM blueprint phase. I understand from my documentation/training, that there are standard programs to interface the HR org from ERP to SRM, and also (seperate) standard interfaces to interfaces users across also. I wish

  • Sales order item 1 values are getting deleted

    HI, when i am creating sales order with material variants the dimension values( legth ,width ) for the first item are getting delted. it is happening after the BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE executed for  the second item. where could be the problem. is any f