Internet Explorer Archives

I'm planning to buy a new Macbook shortly. But I have a problem. I've saved hundreds of web pages using Internet Explorer's "archive" function (this saves a complete page with all graphics as a single file). For a research project, I need to be able to open and look at those archives. Does anyone know how I can open them on an Intel Mac?
--Can I run Internet Explorer on an Intel Mac?
--Where can I find an installer for IE? I've got the application on my G4, but no installer. Can I just copy it to the new machine? Will it run without installation?
--Can I use another application to view these files?
Thanks for any light anyone can shed,
Steve

Steve,
I have Internet Explorer running on my MacBook with no problems. If you use Migration Assistant on your MacBook, it should copy IE to it. If not, you can just copy the application from your G4 to your MacBook.
Before you rush in to buying a MacBook Pro you might want to look at the "Excessively Slow Wireless Speeds" discussions on this site. It my take Apple a few more weeks to correct this.
MacBook Pro 2.0Ghz   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  

Similar Messages

  • Internet Explorer Archives on Intel

    A friend has been using an OS9 iMac for years and is now migrating to an Intel Macbook. He was using Internet Explorer 5 and created lots of "archives" of web pages. Unlike Firefox or Safari, IE saved entire web pages in a proprietary binary format. I'm hoping there's a way to open and read these files on an Intel Mac.
    I assume I could run boot camp and a Windows copy of Explorer, but I'm hoping there's a simpler alternative. Will IE run under Rosetta? Or is there another way to view those archives with some third party ap?
    Thanks very much to anybody who can offer any help.
    Steve Cohen

    I just copied my IE 5.2.3 application to a flash drive and ran it off of there on our MacBook and didn't have any problems — I just opened a few pages).
    He could also use WebArchivConverter to convert the IE archives into iCab's web archive format, and then transfer the iCab web archives to the Intel Mac and open them using iCab.
    You can get WebArchiveConverter here if you want to try your luck:
    http://www.icab.de/download4.html.

  • Windows failed to apply the Internet Explorer Zonemapping settings - the data was invald (event ID: 1085)

    Hi All,
    I have a large domain and a long list of websites that are trusted using the following group policy setting:
    Administrative Templates > Windows Components > Internet Explorer> Internet Control Panel > Security Page >
    Site to Zone Assignment List
    On all (XP/vista/win7) workstations across the domain I'm getting the following error:
    Log Name:  System
    Source:  Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy
    Event ID: 1085
    Task Category: None
    Level: Warning
    Keywords:   Description: Windows failed to apply the Internet Explorer Zonemapping settings. Internet Explorer Zonemapping settings might have its own log file.
    There's nothing either side of this error in the log that shines any more light on the issue.
    I know which group policy object its applying these settings but cant find which of the entries in the site to zone assignment list is causing this issue. I looked in the
    Group Policy/Operational log but all I see is the following entry which says "completed" but is logged as an error:
    After some research I'm guessing that the issue is an incorrect wild-card. This is what my trusted sites list looks like (with names removed of course):
    http://servername.*  
    *.internaldomain.com.au  
    *.domain.com.au  
    *.domain.*  
    *.externaldomain.com  
    *.domain.inernaldomain.com.au  
    *.domain.*  
    *.domain/name.*  
    *.domain.inernaldomain.au*  
    *.domain.com
    Is there something obviously incorrect here?
    Does anyone know where I could find an article that clearly outlines the acceptable wildcard syntax for the
    "Security page\ site to zone assignment list" group policy?  Ive read every forum post, website and blog I could find on the internet but nothing is clear and I wasn't able to find an MS document that steps it out. I've also changed the
    existing list a number of times based on blog posts etc but had no luck.
    **Please Note**
    I dont want to change to a different method or have an intellectual debate re why I would have these sites/wildacrd/policy set. I'm really looking to see what entry is invalid and where the documentation is for this policy setting so i can make sure they are
    always correct in the future. 
    thanks in advance for your time and assistance
    Simone
    PS: I've already read the following posts a number of times:
    I get no data but have identified the GP that is causing the issue:
    A test case for troubleshooting group policy application – Event ID 1085 and 7016 - http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2008/08/21/a-test-case-for-troubleshooting-group-policy-application-event-id-1085-and-7016.aspx 
    I dont have any 2 letter domain names:
    Problems Adding Top-Level Domains to Zone Sites List - http://support.microsoft.com/kb/259493
    I tried formatting the list per this article:
    [Solved] The Group Policy client-side extension Internet Explorer Zonemapping failed to execute  - http://daily-it.blogspot.com.au/2008/09/solved-group-policy-client-side.html
    Has no domain wildcard format info:
    Behavior of Site to Zone Assignment List  - http://blogcastrepository.com/blogs/mattbro/archive/2006/09/07/2183.aspx
    Great article, no wildcard data:
    Internet Explorer Policy Settings  - http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb457144.aspx
    Internet zonemapping problem: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserverGP/thread/a8756a27-b562-42ad-8782-87d284e6bcfb/
    Spiceworks Event 1085 (Warning) - http://community.spiceworks.com/windows_event/show/1582-microsoft-windows-grouppolicy-1085
    Event ID 1085 — Application of Group Policy - http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc727303%28v=ws.10%29.aspx
    Application of group policy - http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc727312%28v=ws.10%29.aspx
    Evt ID 1085 GP client-side extension IE ZoneMapping failed to exec  - http://www.winvistatips.com/evt-id-1085-gp-client-side-extension-ie-zonemapping-failed-exec-t706399.html
    Event 1085 - Internet Explorer Zonemapping - http://www.minasi.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=29206
    EventID.net - http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1085&eventno=1412&source=Userenv&phase=1
    Event ID 1085 - Internet Explorer Zonemapping failed to execute - http://www.experts-exchange.com/OS/Microsoft_Operating_Systems/Server/2003_Server/Q_24897522.html
    UPDATE:
    I disabled the original policy and created a new one with only one trusted site address in it. Then I logged into a clean test machine did some testing.What I found after a few hours of testing was; regardless of the site that I have listed in group policy
    The HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Current version\Internet Settings\Zone Map Key registry entry is
    always updated with that entry on the workstation. So the workstation's registry always updates the key with
    *.sitename.com per the site that I have set in GP
    If I run GPUPDATE /FORCE over and over again, on the same machine, under the same user account, using the same DC I get:
    Failure, Failure, Failure, Success, Success, Success, Failure etc
    I wasn't able to determine any pattern to the failures, I tried stopping some of the processes on that machine but didn't find anything that would make it fail/succeed reliably.
    There is no AV or firewalls installed on my test machine
    Anyone have any more ideas?  I think I might install filemon and try to capture some more data unless there's a better tool?

    Yes, and that's straight from my Microsoft TAM. As long as you include an asterisk inside those site-to-zone mappings, you'll continue to see them. The key is whether or not they're working. In my environment, I've seen complete success using the
    http://*.domain.com, or
    https://*.domain.com, no matter if the site is http://www.domain.com or
    http://milk.does.a.body.good.domain.com. Despite the success, we continue to see the errors. It's much the same as Group Policy Preferences where you can apply a setting once, or repeatedly. If you apply
    something repeatedly and it's already set, lookout for some complaints in the application log. It really is annoying. There's potential to play with the logging levels, but I'll admit that my experience ranks as "novice" in this specific section of group policy.
    This link might get the creative juices flowing:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2008/07/18/enabling-group-policy-preferences-debug-logging-using-the-rsat.aspx
    I see you've already read a number of articles including "a test case for troubleshooting those event IDs"... I sympathize with your efforts. I despise warnings and errors that I can't solve or don't want to see, but I've researched a number of them to death
    and found that many are simply "normal". Uggg... I hope this helps, but please take my advice, as with anyone else's out here, with caution. I've seen some crazy recommendations. I saw a recommendation to install SQL on a DHCP server to get failover clustering
    up and running. I hope the guy asking for help didn't listen to that one! : ) - josh

  • How can I save a web page without creating a dozen or more tiny files, which is worse than Internet Explorer?

    When I try to save a Firefox web page, I get about a dozen tiny files with funny names cluttering up my documents folder, and making it hard to find anything. This reminds me of problems I used to have with Internet Explorer more than ten years ago. But at least, IE was kind enough to gather all of these files in a single folder, named "files". Firefox dumps them all into my documents folder. Messy.
    Years ago, I discovered Opera, which offered a file format that combined the original html code with the other files into one file: an internet archive, with the extension mht instead of htm. I used Opera for years, but recently became aware of the advantages of Firefox.
    A few days ago, I downloaded the latest version of Firefox, and installed it. I have been evaluating it ever since. It looks good; I have figured out (more or less) how bookmarks work, and I'm getting used to the taskbars.
    But when I try to save a page, I still get a deluge of tiny files cluttering up the target folder. Firefox doesn't save pages in archive form, but only in the old scattered form. Of course, I could simply save only the html. Maybe that's the best thing, but it loses a lot.
    The chaos of junky files cluttering up my target folder is enough to send me back to Opera, despite its limitations.

    This extension allows for web pages to saved on MHT format. <br />
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8051

  • SOS: JSON and internet explorer

    hi -- I posted the following a few days ago:
    JSON error in internet explorer 8 -- works fine in Firefox
    I haven't heard anything back yet from the forum, so thought I'd send out another SOS.
    I filed an SR, but this is outside the realm of Oracle Support's expertise.
    Anyone had trouble w/ JSON and IE?
    Thanks,
    Carol

    See this page.. (Look for area under native json obkject) [http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2009/03/12/site-compatibility-and-ie8.aspx] it's possible you are getting hit with this issue..
    Thank you,
    Tony Miller
    Webster, TX

  • Internet Explorer 9 no longer works after an uninstall of HP Support Centre

    Internet Explorer 9 no longer works after an uninstall of HP Support Centre and drivers for 3 HP All-in-One printers (psc1310, C4180, F4200).  Intend to re-install for just C4180.  I selected option to remove for all related software, though the HP Update and Photosmart Essentials have been left.  IE9 stops working when launched (even when launched with no add-ons and with Protected Mode disabled and Advanced Settings restored) and regardless of initial URL.  If I remove the IE9 update then IE8 works fine.   I tried re-installing IE9 update, twice, and it continues to fail.
    I’m running Vista 32 Home Premium SP2 on Samsung Q210 with Norton 360 v5, SpywareBlaster and Spybot - Search & Destroy.
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    I now believe the problem with IE9 was not related to HP, but to a Windows Update replacement to the “Intel Corporation - Display - Mobile Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family” drivers:  Intel Corporation Display software update released in February, 2011 (useless link  http://winqual.microsoft.com/support/?driverid=20411791).   IE9 started working OK when I set “Use software rendering instead of GPU rendering*” (see http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1678709 with reference to “faulting module igdumdx32.dll”), so will now investigate removing that update.
    Sorry to have cast aspersions on HP.  MS did this to themselves, as usual.

  • Internet Explorer begins blocking out-of-date ActiveX controls

    On Wednesday 6th August 2014, we announced that as part of our ongoing commitment to delivering a more secure browser, starting September 9th Internet Explorer will block out-of-date ActiveX controls. (Note: The original post stated that the ActiveX blocking
    would begin on August 12th. Please refer to the addendum for further details).
    Please take a look at this important update via the
    blog post as well as the FAQ contained therein and commence testing within your domain.
    Thanks and Regards
    Mark
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2014/08/06/internet-explorer-begins-blocking-out-of-date-activex-controls.aspx
    Mark Feetham Senior Supportability Program Manager, Internet Explorer.

    Hello,
    There seems to be an entry missing in the
    versionlist.xml file.
    There is an entry missing for wsdetect.dll (isInstalled Class ActiveX Control) from Java 1.7, I believe (there is an entry for 1.6, 1.5, 1.4 but 1.7 is missing).
    Here is the relevant portion of the XML file:
    <blocklistentry key="{5852f5ed-8bf4-11d4-a245-0080c6f74284}" entrytype="2">
    <versionentries numberofelements="4">
    <versionentry groupname="Java(TM) 1.6.0_81" filename="wsdetect.dll" productversion="6.0.810.0-6.65535.65535.65535" fileversion="6.0.810.0-6.65535.65535.65535" />
    <versionentry groupname="Java(TM) 1.5.0_71" filename="JavaWebStart.dll" productversion="5.0.710.0-5.65535.65535.65535" fileversion="5.0.710.0-5.65535.65535.65535" />
    <versionentry groupname="Java(TM) 1.4.2_43" filename="JavaWebStart.dll" productversion="1.4.2.430-1.4.65535.65535.65535" fileversion="1.4.2.430-1.4.65535.65535.65535" />
    <versionentry groupname="Java(TM)" filename="*" productversion="*" fileversion="*" />
    </versionentries>
    This causes the alert prompt to appear when using Java 1.7 update 67 even though it's allowed by XML.
    To reproduce, please go to a site that uses wsdetect.dll like Wikipedia (like here
    http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Example.ogg) and check if the prompt appears for you.

  • Office Web Apps - working in other browsers but not Internet Explorer

    Hi there,
    I have office web apps on my SharePoint 2013 environment.  The previews work file when hovering next to a document but if I try to open it, I get "Sorry, we ran into a problem".  It looks as though Excel files open okay but I
    have tested Word and Powerpoint documents and I get this error.  Also, it only appears to happen in Internet Explorer - Google Chrome and Firefox are okay.  Any ideas?

    Thanks for the advice.  I installed the hoftix (on the OWA server) and now it appears to really be broken - nothing is opening using office web apps anymore.
    I found this blog with the same errors I am getting - I'm guessing I will need to uninstall etc. too?? 
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/dodeitte/archive/2013/03/29/issue-with-automatic-updates-enabled-amp-office-web-apps-server-2013-update.aspx

  • I need to know what to look for on the toolbar when I am looking for a "secure site icon" such as the locked padlock on Internet Explorer

    We are unable to identify when we are on a secure site as we can when using Internet Explorer.

    Firefox 3 stil has the padlock in the right corner of the Status Bar (View > Status Bar).<br />
    Firefox 4 won't have the Status Bar anymore, so there you only have the site favicon on the location bar showing the domain if there is a secure connection and the website is identified.<br />
    Be aware that the presence of a padlock is no guarantee that you are connected to the expected website and that is the main reason for removal of the padlock.
    See also [http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2008/05/06/635/ dria.org » Blog Archive » Firefox 3: Site Identification button]

  • Wwv_flow.accept: SIGNATURE (parameter names) MISMATCH in Internet Explorer

    Hi,
    I have an multiple files upload applet embedded in my ApEx page.
    +if (_ie == true) {+
    document.writeln('<OBJECT classid="clsid:8AD9C840-044E-11D1-B3E9-00805F499D93" WIDTH="250" HEIGHT="250" NAME="fileupload" codebase="http://java.sun.com/update/1.4.2/jinstall-1_4-windows-i586.cab#Version=1,4,0,0">');
    +}+
    +else {+
    document.writeln('<APPLET CODE="jfileupload.upload.client.MApplet.class" JAVA_CODEBASE="./" ARCHIVE="/lib/jfileupload.jar,/lib/httpimpl.jar,/lib/chttpclient.jar,/lib/clogging.jar" WIDTH="250" HEIGHT="250" NAME="fileupload">');
    +}+
    +// BEGIN: Update parameters below for INTERNET EXPLORER, FIREFOX, SAFARI, OPERA, MOZILLA, NETSCAPE 6+ support.+
    document.writeln('<PARAM NAME=CODE VALUE="jfileupload.upload.client.MApplet.class">');
    document.writeln('<PARAM NAME=CODEBASE VALUE="./">');
    document.writeln('<PARAM NAME=ARCHIVE VALUE="lib/jfileupload.jar,lib/httpimpl.jar,lib/chttpclient.jar,lib/clogging.jar">');
    document.writeln('<PARAM NAME=NAME VALUE="fileupload">');
    document.writeln('<PARAM NAME="type" VALUE="application/x-java-applet;version=1.4">');
    document.writeln('<PARAM NAME="scriptable" VALUE="true">');
    document.writeln('<PARAM NAME="url" VALUE="http://localhost:8080/upload/process.jsp">');
    document.writeln('<PARAM NAME="paramfile" VALUE="uploadfile">');
    document.writeln('<PARAM NAME="param1" VALUE="todo">');
    document.writeln('<PARAM NAME="value1" VALUE="upload">');
    document.writeln('<PARAM NAME="mode" VALUE="http">');
    +// END+
    +if (_ie == true) {+
    document.writeln('</OBJECT>');
    +}+
    +else {+
    document.writeln('</APPLET>');
    +}+
    and everything works just fine in Firefox. In IE the applet & upload works also just fine, but when pressing any of the buttons / links that do doSubmit(...) I get wwv_flow.accept: SIGNATURE (parameter names) MISMATCH. Checked the logs
    wwv_flow.accept: SIGNATURE (parameter names) MISMATCH
    VARIABLES IN FORM NOT IN PROCEDURE: FILEUPLOAD
    NON-DEFAULT VARIABLES IN PROCEDURE NOT IN FORM:
    DAD name: apex
    PROCEDURE  : wwv_flow.accept
    URL        : http://localhost:7777/pls/apex/wwv_flow.accept
    PARAMETERS :
    +===========+
    P_FLOW_ID:
    +300+
    P_FLOW_STEP_ID:
    +406+
    P_INSTANCE:
    +640383331330048+
    P_PAGE_SUBMISSION_ID:
    +1665117950048907+
    P_REQUEST:
    UPDATE
    +...+
    P_T19:
    +20+
    P_ARG_VALUES:
    +4A2329731083629E48F9E21DBF30E047+
    FILEUPLOAD:
    +jfileupload.upload.client.MApplet[panel1,0,0,400x250,layout=java.awt.BorderLayout,rootPane=javax.swing.JRootPane[,0,0,400x250,layout=javax.swing.JRootPane$RootLayout,alignmentX=0.0,alignmentY=0.0,border=,flags=16777673,maximumSize=,minimumSize=,preferredSize=],rootPaneCheckingEnabled=true]+
    P_MD5_CHECKSUM:
    ENVIRONMENT:
    +============+
    PLSQL_GATEWAY=WebDb
    GATEWAY_IVERSION=3
    SERVER_SOFTWARE=Oracle-Application-Server-10g/10.1.2.0.0 Oracle-HTTP-Server
    GATEWAY_INTERFACE=CGI/1.1
    SERVER_PORT=7777
    SERVER_NAME=localhost
    REQUEST_METHOD=POST
    QUERY_STRING=
    PATH_INFO=/wwv_flow.accept
    SCRIPT_NAME=/pls/apex
    REMOTE_HOST=
    REMOTE_ADDR=10.10.1.27
    SERVER_PROTOCOL=HTTP/1.1
    REQUEST_PROTOCOL=HTTP
    REMOTE_USER=APEX_PUBLIC_USER
    ORACLE_SSO_USER=
    OSSO_IDLE_TIMEOUT_EXCEEDED=
    OSSO_USER_GUID=
    HTTP_CONTENT_LENGTH=18694
    HTTP_CONTENT_TYPE=multipart/form-data; boundary=---------------------------7d91d73a3d06d6
    HTTP_USER_AGENT=Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; OfficeLiveConnector.1.4; OfficeLivePatch.1.3; .NET CLR 3.0.30729)
    HTTP_HOST=localhost:7777
    HTTP_ACCEPT=image/gif, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-ms-application, application/vnd.ms-xpsdocument, application/xamlxml, application/x-ms-xbap, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/x-silverlight, application/vnd.ms-excel, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/msword, */*+
    HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODING=gzip, deflate
    HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE=en-US,nl-BE;q=0.7,fr-BE;q=0.3
    HTTP_ACCEPT_CHARSET=
    HTTP_IF_MODIFIED_SINCE=
    HTTP_REFERER=http://localhost/pls/apex/f?p=300:406:640383331330048::NO:406:P406_SALE_ID:41
    HTTP_SOAPACTION=
    HTTP_ORACLE_ECID=1257265252:77.73.101.136:8384:8244:2,0
    HTTP_ORACLE_CACHE_VERSION=
    HTTP_AUTHORIZATION=
    WEB_AUTHENT_PREFIX=
    DAD_NAME=apex
    DOC_ACCESS_PATH=docs
    DOCUMENT_TABLE=wwv_flow_file_objects$
    PATH_ALIAS=
    REQUEST_CHARSET=WE8MSWIN1252
    REQUEST_IANA_CHARSET=WINDOWS-1252
    SCRIPT_PREFIX=/pls
    +...+
    and looks like IE submits also the fileupload OBJECT object :(. Anyone hit this issue before? Any idea's how can I make IE ignore / not submit that object?
    Thanks in advance,
    Florin

    Florin:
    Is the 'NAME' attribute required for the APPLET ? If not, just remove it or specify 'f01' (assuming you don't have any other apex_item generated items in the page) instead.
    Varad

  • Problem in "Save As" option in Internet Explorer 8

    When I want save the page in Internet Explorer 8 in save as type: Web Archive, single file (*.mht) is missing. Only HTML File is present. So I am unable to save any web page in a single file.
    Please give me the tricks so that I can get back the Web Archive, single file (*.mht) option.

    Hi,
    Did you installed any adds-on recently? For this problem, it would be better to remove IE in
    Turn Windows Features on or off of Control Panel for test.
    In addition, another workaround method is upgrade IE 8 to IE 11, you can have a try.
    If these method no use, please feel free let us know.
    Roger Lu
    TechNet Community Support

  • OS X Server Wiki pages do not display in Internet Explorer 9

    I recently did a clean instalof OS X Server 10.8.2 on my Mac Mini using the recently released version 2.2 (build 166) of the Server App.  Today - after enabling the Wiki - I noticed that the body of the Wiki pages no longer display on Internet Explorer 9 - only the Please Login banner displays.  The Wiki Page body shows only as a squashed down blank rectangular box near the top of the screen.  This happens on all of the PC's that I have tried - both internal and external.
    There were a number of Wiki Enhancements listed in the release notes for Version 2.2 of the Server App.  These enhancement appear to have made it impossible to acess the Wiki using Internet Explorer.
    The Wiki pages are fine using Safari (Mac or Windows) - Firefox (Mac or Windows) and Chrome (Mac or Windows).  The problem is only with IE 9.
    Out of curiosity - I restored an image of my server from last week - prior to the Server App 2.2 udpate - and Wiki (from version 2.1.x) pages work fine in Internet Explorer 9.  (At this point I'm not sure if it is just IE 9 - or other versions of IE.
    Additionally - if I disable the Wiki - and just enable the default website - the default website displays fine in IE 9 - but as soon as I click on "change password" at the bottom of the page - the Enter Old and New Password window - also does not display - similar rectangular box - with just Change Password text in it.
    So the problem is not just with the Wiki.  Unfortunately I do not have any websites set up yet to test with.
    Here is what I see (in IE 9) on the main Wiki page as of version 2.2 of the server app:
    Is anyone else experiencing this?  I will probably open a support issue - because my brand new Mac Mini is covered under AppleCare.
    ~Scott
    Message was edited by: SBeattie2  (Reinserted Screen Print)

    If I save the page as a web archive and then open it MS Word - I see the following text at the bottom:
    <div class="noscript"> To use wikis, enable JavaScript.</div>
    JavaScript is enabled - via Tools / Internet Options / Security - the checkbox for Active Scripts is set to enabled.

  • Unable to open ".mht file" in Internet Explorer 10 and Microsoft Word running on Win7

    .mht file error in internet explorer 10
    "MIME-Version : 1.0 Content-Type:multipart/relates; boundar="---=N_NextPart_01CEFB@&>FA^*@A&)" This document is
    a Single file Web Page, also known as a Web Archive File. If you are seeing this message, your browser or editor doesn't
    support Web Archive files. Please download a browser that support Web Archive, such as Windows Internet Explorer Encoding:quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html;="windows-1252"
    .mht file error in Microsoft Word
    "You need to have Microsoft Outlook Express or Windows Mail installed to work Single File Web Pages. Outlook Express or Windows Mail is an optional component of Microsoft Internet explorer 4 or later."

    This area is for forum issues only.  You'll have better luck posting your question here:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/home?forum=w7itprogeneral
    Please do not read this sentence. Please ignore the previous sentence.

  • How to make 32-bit-only add-ons work with Windows 7, Internet Explorer 11 and Enhanced Protected Mode enabled?

    Hi everybody,
    in IE10 I had the chance to use 32-bit-tabs even with EPM. In IE11 my 32-bit add-ons are all marked as "incompatible".
    Do you have any suggestions?
    Regards, Don

    Hi Don,
    The ”Enhanced Protected Mode ” feature of  Internet Explorer 11 in Windows 7 has been simplified and it doesn`t provide the “Enable 64-bit processes for Enhanced Protected Mode” feature. The Enhanced Protected  Mode is based on the 64 bit process.
    So that may be the reason.
    Here is a link for reference of Enhanced Protected Mode :
    Enhanced Protected Mode
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2012/03/14/enhanced-protected-mode.aspx
    Here is another link for reference(Pay attention Windows 7 part in the end) :
    How Internet Explorer Enhanced Protected Mode (EPM) is enabled under different configurations
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/asiatech/archive/2013/12/25/how-internet-explorer-enhanced-protected-mode-epm-is-enabled-under-different-configurations.aspx
    Best regards 

  • Quicktime for Internet Explorer 64-bit not working?

    The past couple days I was doing some testing on a computer running Windows 7 64-bit. I noticed that while using Internet Explorer, any embedded Quicktime media would prompt the surfer to download Quicktime when in fact it's already installed on the system.
    When I'd approve the download/installation anyhow I'd get a brief pause, then nothing. No error message, but IE still did not have QT capabilities. Tried multiple times, still no luck.
    Is QT even compatible with IE 64-bit? It's a concern for me not because I actually use IE (and certainly don't want to get into an argument over the merits of various OSs and browsers), but because I'm presenting a large archive of Quicktime videos and I want them to be compatible with a variety surfers' systems.

    Good-O.
    Working on the principle that this might be caused by some subtle damage to the QuickTime program files relating to ActiveX controls, I think we should try a clean uninstall/reinstall of QuickTime, taking a few other explicit precautions along the way (just in case).
    First, download and save a fresh copy of the QuickTime installer from the Apple Website. (Don't run the install on line, and don't start the install just yet. Get the installer that doesn't mention iTunes.)
    http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/
    Now head into your Uninstall a program control panel. Uninstall QuickTime.
    Next we'll clear away any leftover program files and folders.
    In "Computer" open "Local Disk C:" or whichever drive you have your *program files* installed on.
    Open the "Program Files (x86)" folder.
    Right-click on the "QuickTime" folder (if it still exists) and select "Delete").
    Go back into "Local Disk C:" or whichever drive you have your *operating system* installed on.
    Open the "Windows" folder.
    Open the "SysWOW64" folder.
    Right-click on the QuickTime.qts and QuickTimeVR.qtx files (if they still exist) and select "Delete".
    Restart the PC.
    After the PC restarts, do not open any applications (especially not either of the IE 8 browsers). Disconnect from your network and/or the internet. Now switch off all your security software. (Firewall, antivirus, antispyware.)
    Now start the QuickTime reinstall by doubleclicking the QuickTimeInstaller.exe file you downloaded earlier.
    (This may also update your Apple Application Support to version 1.3.0 ... I'm not sure whether or not the QT 7.6.6 installer bundle has been modified to include the new version yet.)
    Reenable all security software prior to reconnecting to your network and/or the internet.
    Did the QuickTime install seem to go through okay?
    If so, fire up the 64-bit version of IE 8 and browse to a website containg QuickTime content ... like Apple.com, for example. Do you get asked by IE to install the ActiveX component this time around? If so, does it install properly this time?

Maybe you are looking for