Internet Explorer - couldn't attach files for emai...

In Internet Explorer, I tried to attach and send a file from my Lumia 800. But, after clicking the browse button for attaching file, there is no response. Is this the case with all or this could be resolved?
Regards,
R.Manikanth

Hi manikanth_r,
Thank you for your post and welcome to the forums!
Internet Explorer on Windows phone cannot upload files by design, like masterpeura mentioned. If you need to send attachments, it's recommended to use the phone email client. Please see here for instructions on how to set up an email account on your phone.
Hope this helps,
Puigchild
If you find this post helpful, a click upon the white star at bottom would always be appreciated.
If it also solves your problem, clicking ACCEPT AS SOLUTION below it will benefit other users!

Similar Messages

Windows internet explorer 5.0 or above for E61

I would like to install windows internet explorer 5.0 or above for my Nokia E61 phone. How can i do this safely and what memory size would be required for this download?
Help anybody?

I have E61i and need to go into internet to check my Lotus Notes Email through Sametime but I cannot as it seems that there is a problem with JAVA enabling as the msg i get is make sure that JAVA is enabled on your mobile.
The JAVA is enabled already and I checked it but I still cannot get through at all.
Is there a new Java version that needs to be downloaded and installed? and where from?

Right versions of Java for Internet Explorer 8,8,19 versions for BO 4.1

Hi,
Can any body guide me on the right version of Java(Internet Explorer version 8,9,10) for BI Launch Pad 4.1 SP6?

Hi,
If there is enough time to validate SP06 against MS Windows 10, and if the enterprise market demands it (i.e. our maintained customer-base) then it would certainly be considered.
However, Win 10 isn't out yet, and if SP06 comes out in only few months.. then the timelines aren't favourable.
Realistically, we don't anticipate enterprise organisations to be adopting Win 10 as soon as it comes out.. It's a fringe requirement. But that said, our SPs are designed to offer additional PAM support, so let's see.
Regards,
H

[SOLVED]Couldn't open file for 'Log debug file /var/log/tor/debug.log'

Hello,
I'm trying to run a tor relay on my arch linux box. Trying to launch the tor daemon, here's the log via
$ systemctl status tor.service
May 20 11:53:10 arch tor[21726]: May 20 11:53:10.877 [notice] Tor v0.2.4.21 (git-505962724c05445f) running on Linux with Libevent 2.0.21-stable and OpenSSL 1.0.1g.
May 20 11:53:10 arch tor[21726]: May 20 11:53:10.877 [notice] Tor can't help you if you use it wrong! Learn how to be safe at https://www.torproject.org/download/download#warning
May 20 11:53:10 arch tor[21726]: May 20 11:53:10.877 [notice] Read configuration file "/etc/tor/torrc".
May 20 11:53:10 arch tor[21726]: May 20 11:53:10.909 [notice] Opening Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9050
May 20 11:53:10 arch tor[21726]: May 20 11:53:10.909 [notice] Opening OR listener on 0.0.0.0:9798
May 20 11:53:10 arch tor[21726]: May 20 11:53:10.000 [warn] Couldn't open file for 'Log debug file /var/log/tor/debug.log': Permission denied
May 20 11:53:10 arch tor[21726]: May 20 11:53:10.000 [notice] Closing partially-constructed Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9050
May 20 11:53:10 arch tor[21726]: May 20 11:53:10.000 [notice] Closing partially-constructed OR listener on 0.0.0.0:9798
May 20 11:53:10 arch tor[21726]: May 20 11:53:10.000 [warn] Failed to parse/validate config: Failed to init Log options. See logs for details.
May 20 11:53:10 arch tor[21726]: May 20 11:53:10.000 [err] Reading config failed--see warnings above.
May 20 11:53:10 arch systemd[1]: tor.service: main process exited, code=exited, status=255/n/a
May 20 11:53:10 arch systemd[1]: Unit tor.service entered failed state.
Why the tor daemon cannot write into /var/log/tor/debug.log ?
Here's my /etc/group
root:x:0:root
bin:x:1:root,bin,daemon
daemon:x:2:root,bin,daemon
sys:x:3:root,bin
adm:x:4:root,daemon,nue
tty:x:5:
disk:x:6:root
lp:x:7:daemon
mem:x:8:
kmem:x:9:
wheel:x:10:root,nue
ftp:x:11:
mail:x:12:
uucp:x:14:
log:x:19:root
utmp:x:20:
locate:x:21:
rfkill:x:24:
smmsp:x:25:
http:x:33:
games:x:50:
lock:x:54:
uuidd:x:68:
dbus:x:81:
network:x:90:
video:x:91:
audio:x:92:
optical:x:93:
floppy:x:94:
storage:x:95:
scanner:x:96:
power:x:98:
nobody:x:99:
users:x:100:
systemd-journal:x:190:
nue:x:1000:
avahi:x:84:
lxdm:x:121:
polkitd:x:102:
git:x:999:
transmission:x:169:
vboxusers:x:108:
tor:x:43:
mysql:x:89:
Last edited by giuscri (2014-05-20 12:18:56)

SidK wrote:You must have modified your torrc to print to that log file. systemd starts the service as the tor user (see /usr/lib/systemd/system/tor.service). So if if you want to log to a file the tor user must have write access to it. By default however tor it set to log to the journal, which doesn't require any special permissions.
Yes. I did edit the torrc file since I wanted the log to be store in that file. Indeed
## Logs go to stdout at level "notice" unless redirected by something
## else, like one of the below lines. You can have as many Log lines as
## you want.
## We advise using "notice" in most cases, since anything more verbose
## may provide sensitive information to an attacker who obtains the logs.
## Send all messages of level 'notice' or higher to /var/log/tor/notices.log
#Log notice file /var/log/tor/notices.log
## Send every possible message to /var/log/tor/debug.log
Log debug file /var/log/tor/debug.log
## Use the system log instead of Tor's logfiles
Log notice syslog
## To send all messages to stderr:
#Log debug stderr
I missed the file systemd uses to choose who's the process owner.
Course, I could edit /usr/lib/systemd/system/tor.service such that root will become the process owner; or, I could add the user I use everyday in the root group, then change the permission of /var/log/tor/debug.log such that it will be writable also for the folks in the root group.
Yet they both seems to be a bit unsafe ...
What is the best choice, to you guys?
Thanks,

Is Internet Explorer incompatible with Airport Extreme for connecting wirelessly to the Internet?

repeat -is Internet Explorer incompatible with Airport Extreme for connecting to the Internet- I am trying to hook up my sister's / Windows 7...HP mini computer to my wireless connection (Airport Extreme to cable /BrightHouse ) all I get is -failed due to 'error 651' -am about to call the jockeys at the cable company to see if they have work-around. Any comment appreciate. Thanks./jimiros

Diane,
I have added very few apps to my G5. The majority of my time is spent editing photos with PhotoshopCS3. I have software updates set to run weekly and have always kept them up to date. I really believe it's a disk permissions issue...but repairing them doesn't help.
*+Upon installation, I used Archive and Install.+* While I agree that Erase and Install may sound like a good idea, it makes me nervous. I do have everything backed up on a bootable CMS drive, but I'm a photographer and was hoping to not have to erase the G5.
Yes, as I mentioned in the original post, I've downloaded and installed the Airport firmware update. And all software is up to date.
All was working just dandy before the upgrade. Unfortunately now it's sounding like I may have to erase my hard drive and install fresh.
If I do that, is it just a matter then of dragging my photos from the backup disk to the G5? And documents? Etc?? The thought of getting all my photos and important information back on the G5 seems a bit staggering.

I cannot download software or export secure Certificate from Firefox, but can with Internet Explorer. This is crucial for meeting a deadline with an international patent Filing Today. Pls help - 555-555-5555. Sheldon

I tried to download an e-filing client software from the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) website [http://www.wipo.int/pct-safe/en/download/download_client.htm] using Firefox. Clicking the link to download yielded no activity. I eventually tried the same link in internet explorer and it worked. This occurred last week. I have a deadline to complete an international patent filing today; and in order to do so online, I had to request a Secure Digital ID from WIPO. It was approved and received early this morning (Central European Time Zone); and the accompanying guidelines suggested that I use the same computer and browser to retrieve the ID. This meant that since I use Firefox as my default browser my request was also made and had to be retrieved in Firefox. Following the WIPO support instructions I ran into exactly the same problem of inactivity when trying to "Backup" my newly installed ID certificate per WIPO instruction, so that it may be imported into the e-filing software. Please help as soon as you can as my patent deadline is merely hours away. Please also see a response from the WIPO helpdesk below:
Dear User,
we hereby provide the following solution / answer to your request:
Subject: Certificates (use of and different types)/26708 Answer from PCT-SAFE Help Desk:
Unfortunately, apart from revoking your new certificate and then re-enrolling using Internet Explorer, I do not see many options.
We cannot do support for external software, like Firefox, but I had a quick glance at Mozilla's support side and it seems that you might be able to resolve your problem by starting Firefox in safe mode, and/or disabling all your Firefox extensions. I have to stress the fact that this is not a procedure tested and approved by the PCT-SAFE team.
As this is an extremely time-sensitive issue please also contact me by phone so that we can work through the solution in real-time. I can be reached at 555-555-555 - Sheldon
'''Moderator edit: Removed personal information. This is a public forum. Please do not post any personal information as it may put your safety at risk -FF4L'''
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== Attempting to download from a secure server

Just to follow up on my findings. My last issue regarding the digital certificate was not at the time of initial download into Firefox, but my application required that I backup the certificate into a folder which can then be accessed to sign a submission generated by a third-party Client software.
After finally steering away from the digital signing route by opting for a non digital filing of my project, I later revisited the Firefox certificates list only to find that the 'Backup' button still didn't work or respond in any way whatsoever; however since I only had a single certificate on my list... I threw my hand up in the air and tried the 'Backup All' button... guess what - that worked!! My browser then navigated to a file browser which allowed me to save the certificate to a folder of my choice. Of course this was after the fact as my deadline had already passed and and I had the Administrator who initially granted my secure ID revoke it once I was blocked from downloading it by Firefox.
Just an update/FYI for y'all... But I'm not sure if this type of anomoly is due to a glitch on my computer or a glitch on the browser - but it certainly did catch me off-guard during a deadline.

I am not able to open pdf files from any web through Firefox. Internet explorer opens those pdf files

I am not able to open pdf files from any web when I use FireFox.
I am able to open pdf files when I use internet explorer.

For the settings to check, see the [[opening PDF files within Firefox]] article.

Add Ons,Internet Explorer and downloading PDF files

There is one website where I have an issue downloading some PDF files,I do not have problems on any other website,admin at problem website gets no other complaints.
I use Adobe Reader 11.0.08.
I discovered that if I DISABLE the ADD ON in Internet Explorer for Adobe Reader I can easily download all content from this problem website ,If I ENABLE ( my norml operation ) the ADD ON for Adobe Reader ,the PDF download problem appears again.
What exactly is the ADD ON doing ? I'm under the inmpression that it ties software to a website ,so when I ask for a PDF file on a website, the website looks for Adobe Reader and the PDF file opens ,using Adobe Reader . . . if I disable the ADD ON . . . doesn't the website NOT know how to give me the PDF file . . . yet with the ADD ON Disabled this problem website downloads the PDF file using Adobe ( it said it is using Adobe ) with no problem ?
Why ??
This issue happens on two differnt PC's ??

P.Willener,
Thanks for response.
The website is not public ,that I have PDF download issues using Adobe Reader 11.0.08. I have no PDF download issues on any other website with PDF files.
On this problem site I can download some files, others I can't.
The website admin gets no other complaints from other website users.
I discovered that on a friends new PC ,this website works good and I can download all files, no problems.
I have an older PC ( 2008 vintage ) ,it runs Windows 7 and IE 11 , with this PC I have PDF download issues on this website only , when the problem occurs the files stop and never complete downloading, all recent website PDF files download OK, older files do not ,on my PC . . . but if I DISABLE the Adobe Reader ADD ON ,ALL files download with no problem, if I ENABLE the Adobe ADD ON ,I have problems.
My question is . . . why ? When the ADD ON for Adobe Reader is ENABLED what is different then when the ADD ON is DISABLED ,for Adobe Reader ?
To me ,it seems that in the ENABLED mode ,the PDF file is opening within the IE browser ,using Adobe Reader , when the ADD ON is DISABLED the PDF file is opening in the External Reader mode , using Adobe Reader am I correct on this thinking ????
So again why would I have issues on this one website only ? Yes there is a work around but my normal way of operating is what the Adobe Reader ADD ON ENABLED.
Any ideas what is going on ???? If you suspect the website any thoughts on what their problem could be ???? Again they get no other complaints ,I guess they all have new PC's.
Al

Internet Explorer prevented installation of Mozilla for safety reasons

When attempting to install Mozlla Firefox, an Internet Explore pop-up appeared warning of safety issues with going forward in the installation.

You may be getting a general Internet Explorer warning about installing software from the internet. Obviously you should always be careful.
Make sure to download from the official site: http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/
It may be better to "save" the download to a convenient location instead of using "run". This will give you a chance to scan the file for viruses if your computer doesn't do that automatically.

Unable to save PDF - Internet Explorer Protected Mode "A file error has occurred"

Hi,
I hope you can all assist! Here's the detail:
Reader XI (11.0.06) and deployed as physical installation (.msi)
Windows 7 x64 Enterprise
Internet Explorer 8 & 9
Opening PDF's from HTTP & HTTPS locations
Users are unable to save the PDF file to their chosen location (network share or local directory) "A file error has occurred".
When the Internet Explorer Protected Mode is switched off, users are able to save the file to their chosen location.
Is this is specific functionality of IE Protected Mode whereby the ActiveX control is being restricted.
Is this due to Enhanced security within the Adobe Reader 11.0.06 application?
Our current Reader version (9.3.0) is able to save files from unprotected locations, so this is creates a problem justify upgrading.
Do anyone have any suggestions?
Look forward to any assistance or suggestions.
Thanks,
Simon.

Hi Simon,
How are you saving the file (right click or from File menu)? Does the problem happen with any PDF file? Does the problem go away if you turn "Enable Protected Mode at startup" from Reader (Preferences > Security (Enhanced)?

Where can I find Internet Explorer or Netscape to download for my iMac?

I have a website for some studies that says Internet Explorer or Netscape are the required browsers.
I've tried to open the website using Chrome and Safari but an error message comes up in a big red box.

Welcome to Apple Support Communities
Internet Explorer is only available for Windows and Netscape was discontinued. There was a Internet Explorer version for Macs, but it was years ago and only for PowerPC-based Macs.
First, you can try enabling the Internet Explorer mode in Safari to see if you can access to the site. To do it, first open Safari, go to Safari menu (on the menu bar) > Preferences > Advanced, and mark "Show Develop menu in menu bar". Then, close Preferences and go to Develop menu (on the menu bar) > User Agent, and choose one of the Internet Explorer options

Text quality from websites noticeably inferior to Internet Explorer, is there a fix for this?

The quality of text on websites is quite poor with thin type and fuzzy definition, however pictures are good. The quality is noticeably worse than IE8 on the same computer.

Firefox uses your system-level setting for ClearType font anti-aliasing. Internet Explorer has a separate setting so you can use ClearType in IE even if you aren't using it system-wide. This might explain why you see a difference.
Can you check your ClearType setting using the steps in this article:
[http://support.microsoft.com/kb/306527 HOW TO: Use ClearType to Enhance Screen Fonts in Windows XP (MSKB 306527)]

Which minimul parameters of Internet explorer i have to set for portal ?

Hi Experts,
Which minimul parameters of Microsoft internet explorer(Version 6 & 7) i have to set for portal ?
Thanks & Regards,
Gurprit Bhatia

Hi Gurprit,
Checkout the below link on Internet Explorer 6:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/ep/msie%2b6%2bbrowser%2bsettings%2bfor%2baccessing%2bsap%2bportals
Also, as mentioned above on PAM, Internet Explorer 7.0 is supported since SP19 for the Netweaver 2004 environment
https://websmp109.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=00200682500000001303&_EVENT=RELEASE&00200682500000002804=01200314690900000192&00200682500000003818=WBRPFM&00200682500000003853=Enterprise%20Portal
Previous posts in SDN forum:
Browser Setting in Portal
Hope that helps.
Ray

NPD - no chance to attach files for no signature requestees

Hello,
Please see here below the following scenario:
ACTIVITY: RISK ASSESSMENT
ACTYVITY TYPE: DOCUMENT COLLABORATION IN PLACE EDITING
TEAM MEMBERS: they are not entered at activity template level but they are assigned at project level
OWNER in step 2: procurement, VAT Team
Signature request in step 2: procurement
No specific roles are assigned to these two users as they only need to edit activity steps where they are owners.
I create a project and this activity from activity template.
I move this activity forward STEP 2.
VAT Team logs in AGILE for Process.
He goes to RISK ASSESSMENT activity in step 2.
He clicks on EDIT Button.
it looks like he is only authorized to attach files as attachments.
He cannot enclose files with the in place editing functionality !!!!!
VAT TEAM is able to edit files with the in place functionality, but they need to be previously added into the system by procurement !
If I set VAT TEAM as signature request as well as procurement, he is able to upload files to edit with that functionality !!
What am I missing?
It looks unacceptable actually.
An user could not be necessarily a signature requestee to upload files withthe in place editing...
Please kindly advise.
Thanks and regards
Daniele

Go ahead and submit an SR so support can review this scenario and determine whether there is a problem.

When Internet Explorer 8 will be supported for BOE?

There seems to be very little info on Internet Explorer 8 for BOE on Support Portal. Anyone aware of any timeframes?

Hi,
IE 8 is supported in [XI3.1 SP2|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/402db6eb-845d-2c10-a38c-aafde85ec769&overridelayout=true] but only in "Compatibility mode"
- Subhodeep

Internet Explorer - couldn't attach files for emai...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for