Intreim Storage type in TO

When we r doing GR in IM it will create a TR, while doing TO Scr Storage type is Intreim(902) & the Des is physical storage type & bin. But we can able to give a Intreim storage type & bin in Des. also.
Why it is allowing?
Why not?
It may easily happen that you have to move the goods to another interim storage type - e.g. this process is used in cross-docking where you receive the goods (e.g. 902) and without putting them away into one of the normal storage types, you directly move them to storage type 916 and ship them out.
Or just think of the inventory process as well as PCNs and you will see that the system itself uses TOs where both source and destination storage types are interim ones.
Regards,
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Mar 29, 2009 2:34 PM

Similar Messages

How to delete all HU in one storage type

Dear experts I did use the /SCWM/ISU for uploading of the stock but now I need to change something in the structure of the storage bins.
I cannot change anything, because the bins are having HU already. Could someone give me a tipp how I can delete all HUs from one specific storage type?
Thanks in advance
BR
Denis

Hi Denis,
If the HUs are empty then the above solutions as Pet and Ifran mentioned should work for you. Else, if you have stock in the HUs then you need to scrap the stock, you can do this using /n/scwm/adgi look up the HUs then scrap them. This will empty the bins.
Thanks,
Faical

Reservation of stock at Storage Type level in Warehouse

Hi Gurus,
My client is currently using ORACLE ERP system and they are migrating to SAP.
In ORACLE there is a flexibility wherein reservation can be activated for warehouse stock.
However, in SAP we are mapping the multiple warehouses present in ORACLE as Storage types.
So, I would like to know whether there is a way to reserve the stocks at storage type level.
According to my analysis direct reservation is possible at plant and storage location level.
However I would like to know from you whether there is a direct way to reserve the stocks in storage type in warehouse or any in-direct way possible to reserve the storage type stock?
Thanks & Regards
Subhasis

However, in SAP we are mapping the multiple warehouses present in ORACLE as Storage types.
That's probably a bad move. A physical warehouse should be at least one storage location, and storage types should only be used for sub organization inside a warehouse.
For example if Storage types are used for High Rack, Bulk, etc (what they are supposed to be used for) there is no reason to reserve stock in a specfic storage type.
Storage type vs Storage location. A "type" shouldn't be used to separate different warehouses.

Storage Location or Storage type

Hi Experts ,
Here is the complete scenario .....
W1 -- Warehouse1 which has Supplies and Pharma
W2 -- Warehouse 2 which has Supplies and Equipments
W3 -- Warehouse 3 has Pharma only
W1 and W3 are in one Physical structure with partition
W2 is across the road...
1. Supplies move from W2 to W1 when supplies go low in warehouse 1 (W1) this is done almost daily .
2. Supplies from W1 are moved to W2 if there is any overflow or supplies come in excess which happens few times a week.
3. We have 3 shipment points where they perform shipping and receiving each for W1,W2 and W3.
4. we have 6 staging spots for staging of international shipments on W1
 and we have about 10 staging spots in W2 ....We need to know the exat location of where the shipping pallet is located for compliance purpose (Inspection )
5. Most of the receiving is done in W1 (about 85 %) where it is inspected , arranged and then put away is done accordingly ....
 If the shipment contains only equipments or Beds then its received in W2.
6. When there is an overflow of Pharma in W1 then some of the supplies in W1 are removed and put in W2 so that they get space for Pharma storage .....
7. Warehouse 3 (W3) has high value Pharma, basically used for domestic shipments (in US) or the pharma products which dont have space in W1.
8.. Moving of Pharma products for storage from W3 to W1 happens rarely;
9. Moving from W1 to W3 happens almost daily ..cause when ever the products get over in W3 then they move it from W1.
10. Picking for international shipments takes place from W3 and W1 and are shipped from W1 in big Pallets.
11. When they receive the product in Big pallets in W1 some pharma products go to W1 and some in W3 , depending on the value .
12. Some times the domestic Shipments are in large quantity so its taken from W3 to W1 and staged for shipment in W1.
13. Domestic (within US) shipments is done through Fed Ex ....which is done daily ....
My Question is will it be wise to
OPTION 1:make these 3 warehouses into 3 storage locations...(1 plant >3storage locations>1 warehouse )or
OPTION 2: is it wise to make these 3 warehouses into 3 storage types ...... (1plant --->1 storage location --->1 warehouse -
>3 storage types -->1 section under each storage type )
Will there be any problem to define shipping point,carry physical inventory,stock transfers and work with RF devices in future if i choose option 2 
Your Advise is precious to me ....Please do let me know the pros and cons .....for options ..above ....
Regards
Albert

Hello Albert,
It's always suggested to have very simple organization structure so we can avoid extra transaction.
Now in your case, if you define three Plant/SLoc/warehouse then you are going to end up with more and more transactions at inventory level and followed by warehouse transactions.
I suggest to have one Sloc and one warehouse for this kind of organization and maintain different storage type for each physical location. This will reduce the IM level transactions. Now when moving material from one facility to another facility you can maintain one more storage type for the Transport Equipement (i.e. Cart/Forklift etc) so when you move from W1 to W2 at that time you can do bin to bin transfer.
Also you want facility for overflow in one facility so this can be achieved with allowing two storage type for putaway.
for different kind of Supplies and pharma, I am sure you will plan different material type for them so that will help to get reports for each category.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Batch determination based on WM storage type stock positions

Hello experts,
I am hoping the get some advise on the best method to achieve this:
We have batch determination turned on for select customers and the system is proposing stock that is mainly in our each or lose pick storage types (110), the issue with that is the fact that we do not pick in less then case qty for those customers so if the stock doesn't exist in our general storage the user must re-determinthe batch codes before delivery release.
This process is becoming very time consuming so I would like to improve it.
My first thought is to create a custom check in the batch search strategy that will only propose batch codes that exist in our general storage (search strategy based on WM stock positions)
Are there any other options to achieve a batch search strategy based in WM stock positions other then the one above and does that solution sound practical?

I'm not referring to the type of picking either (i'm not referring to picking strategies at all). I'm referring to storage type search criteria defined in OMLY.
"We need batch determination based on WM storage type stock positions" -> you are running BD at delivery level and therefore, there is nothing from a standard perspective that we can do to run BD based on WM storage type again. Since the BD has already occurred, we need to find other venues to direct the pick to the appropriate storage types.
This is what I'm understanding but I reckon there's something that I'm missing and so let's take the below example and then you can get back with corrections:
R001 plant
ZM01 storage location
Z01 WH
110, 120, 130, 140 storage types (110, 120, 130 are case/lose pick, and 140 is general)
Since you had mentioned earlier that the BD is running at plant level, I'd assume the storage location ZM01 is automatically determined (since the batch resides in ZM01). Since the batch is already determined, based on your 'storage search strategy' (110, 120, 130) the system tries to pick this batch in these storage types. Now, when there is no full case, you have to manually change the storage type to 140 to pick and this is where the problem is. So, I was recommending that since there is no standard way to automatically pick the full case from 140, use the enhancement.

How to exclude stock of a particular storage type from collective availabil

How to exclude stock of a particular storage type from collective availability check in MDVP.

you can set the storage location as 'Storage location stock excluded from MRP' value '1' in the field
Sloc MRP indicator , in MRP view $ when you enter a storage location accessing the material master.
Thsi is the only way to exclude the storage location, you have to do it per each material and also it is excluded from the MRP.
With this option the stock is not considered in ATP.
IF you need the storage location in the MRP, then you should consider the use of MRP Areas.
With the MRP Areas you define which plants/storage locations belong to each MRP area and the ATP is performed for eah area with the stocks that exist in each of them.
Please if the issue is solved set the thread as answered and provide the points to the useful replies.
thanks for your cooperation

How to delete the material records related to storage type

Dear SAP guru's,
I got a situation that if the material "XXXXXX" exists in two different storage type (let say 001 & 002 ) and the material needs to be removed out of one (Let say 002) to avoid the picking and putaway in future.
Inorder to accomplish an above requirement we tried the below cases
Case 1: By flagged the material "XXXXXX" under storage type 002 in MM06 transaction.But it didn't restrict the system on allocating and removing the stock from /to to the storage type 002.
Case 2:After we flagged the material for deletion under storage type 002 ,we used to MM71 transaction to archive & delete the material record that assocaited with the storage type 002 completely.
I am kind of queiries to know if there is any other method or procedure available to delete the storage type associated material records in SAP.
Please guide me with the other options.Thanks.
Regards,
John.

Hi John,
Its very simple, remove the Storage type indicators from the material master - Warehouse View 1 at Stock placement & Stock removal section, with this it won't pickup or place the materials in the concerned storage type.
If you have extended this materials to more than 1 storage type, you need to do the same for all the storage types.
Reward if it is helpful.

How to transfer stock from one storage type another storage type

Hi Guys
I have 10 items
How can I transfer all in One Single Transfer order from one storage type to another storage type
I need to take TO print for all these 10 TO items

Hi,
Goto LT01 transaction with Movment type = 999 and stock category = Required stock category. Create a PCN and process the remaining process so as to change the stock type.
Regards,
Dilli Babu R

In WM how to clear partially difference in an open storage type with one mi

Hi
I would like to know how in WM to clear partially differences in an open storage type with one mixed bin not totally counted?
thanks in advance
cadanj

Please do the inventory check for the whole bin.Count the each quant of the material. Difference can be cleared.Use following transactions.
1.LI01N-Create Inventory document.
2.LI11N-Enter inventory count.
3.LI20-Clear WM differences
4.LI21-Clera IM differences.
Let me know if u have any other question.
Regards,
PRashant

WM-PP : Backflush a material from different bins in the same storage Type

Hi Gurus,
We have a business scenarion where we do manual staging for production , the staging area has different bins within the same storage type for the same material, I am wondering if there is a way to backflush the material from different storage bins upon prod. order confirmation (using a control cycle?)
Thanks
Kris T

Look like it's not possible using the SAP standard.

Limiting Inventory Display of Storage Types within LX02

Hello All,
We are using SAP WM and have a situation where we are contracting with a 3rd party warehouse to hold some raw materials for us. We will have a captive user account that will only permit the employee at the 3rd party warehouse to perform certain restricted transaction codes. In one of the transaction codes that displays WM-based inventory, we want to only have transaction code LX02 - STOCK LIST display only the storage type that represents the inventory at that facility. We have a single WM warehouse that has multiple storage types and have allocated one storage type to represent that 3rd party warehouse location (which really is just an extension of the manufacturing plant). For example, if I have storage types A, B, C, and D within a single WM warehouse, and I have made the decision that C represents the 3rd party location, then I only want to setup SAP security to restrict the 3rd party warehouse employee to be able to only see storage type C and not the others. Can this be done with the proper assignment of security authorizations to allow this? If so, what is the authorization object that controls this?
BTW, we do not want to use a separate WM warehouse or plant to control this as that results in solving the above problem but introduces many other issues and problems.
Thanks!!

Hi,
I checked that report and it uses logical database S1L. If you display documentation for this logical DB in SE36 you will find this section
Authorization checks for the warehouse number take place in the database.
Warehouse number
So it does not seem that tit will work for you. What you can try to do is to enhance LX02 to perform additional authorization check. Using implicit enhancement points you can add code to the beginning of any routine. In this case you could enhance routine call_alv.
Cheers

Storage type to be assigned to particular storage location

Hi,
As per clients new business requirement, 2 storage locations of a plant are assigned to same warehouse.
But as the storage types comes under warehouse they come under both the storage locations. Is there any configuration to assign specific storage types to a particular storage location.
I tried in SPRO under interfaces>IM>Storage location control but it does not allow.
Please advice.
Regards,
Pratap

Hi,
I feel the solution given by E060123 in his first reply should work well.
Did you first define the storage location refernce and then in the same config node under "Control of Assignment "Plant / Stor.Loc. - Whse Number" assigned the sloc reference to the respective storage location
And then assigned the reference to the search table as mentioned previously.

Storage Type 916 in the outbound delivery

SAP GURU,
When i am creating a outbound delivery against a sales order...as my Plant is warehouse mnamanged so Warehouse will automatically get determined in the delivery based on SPRO setting but i am not able to find out how storage type 916 at the item level in picking view is getting determinated automtically.
If i check storage type search criteria in SPRO..we have not maintained 916 storage type for my ware house and picking combination.
Plz help in getting the logic of 916 storage type.
Nitin

I got the answer myself ...Plz ignore my question.

Error Addition to stock of material A in storage type 002 is not allowed

Dear all,
I am doing GR for PO in WM. During TO creation I am getting this error Addition to stock of material A in storage type 002 is not allowed. Hence no storage bins can be entered. May I know under what scenarios this type error props up?
Thanks in advance,
Prashanth

Please find the explanation in SAP online help:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/c6/f8449d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
SPRO > LE > WM > Master Data > Define Storage Type
Check
- putaway strategy --> V_T3010-STEIN
- addition to existing stock indicastor ---> V_T3010-ZULAG
As you can read in the help, other factoers such as capacity may influence this.
Regards,
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Feb 19, 2010 7:55 AM

HU without inventory management and message L3778 in storage type 999

Hi experts,
Need suggestion on the process to add inventory of an HU with status 'HU without inventory Management'. This issue has occurred out of the below scenario:
1. our warehouse is HU & WM managed.
2. We have a transfer order for a delivery document requesting to pick up 100 cases of MAT1 which is assigned to HU1.
3. While confirming the transfer order user has confirmed difference for the full quantity of 100 because the SU/HU was not found in the bin.
4. The system has set the status of HU as 'HU without inventory Management'. The HU is empty.
5. system has moved the stock from the bin to difference storage type 999.
Now user has found the stock for this HU and he wants to post the stock back into the bin. system does not allow to move the stock back to bin using LT01 as we get error message 'L3 778'.
What will be the best practice to get the stock back into the bin and post the stock into the same old HU.
Is there a process wherein we can post this stock to another bin and repack into the old HU?
Thanks,
Harish

Thanks Manish on the hint. I was able to transfer stock to partner location and then bring back to original Storage type/Bin. Below steps was used to fixed the issue:
1. Initiate a transfer of stock from WM/HU Sloc where the IM stock resides into Sloc 9099. An outbound delivery is created during this process.
2. Create a transfer order with reference to delivery and pick the stock from 999 storage type.
3. Create a Pick HU using LH01 and assign the HU on the pallet to the transfer order.
4. Confirm the transfer order using LT12.
5. Perform PGI for the delivery.
6. Use HUMO to display the HU and then you can transfer the stock back to WM/HU location using the storage location transfer option available on the HUMO screen(EDIT à change HU posting à Storage location)
7. Perform Bin to bin transfer to move the SU from 921 storage type to putaway the HU/SU back to the destined Storage type/Bin.
Best Regards,
Harish

Intreim Storage type in TO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for