Invalid Static Route

I'm trying to add a static route to my 350n and it keeps saying "invalid static route" no matter what I try???
Here's what I have:
External IP = static, on the 350n
Lan IP = 192.168.28.1/24
I need to route 172.17.0.1/16 to 192.168.28.253 so I did:
Setup>Advanced Routing:
Route Name = foo
Destination Lan IP = 172.17.0.1
Mask = 255.255.0.0
Gateway = 192.168.28.253
Interface = Lan & Wireless
Then I click save and get the error....what am I doing wrong?

As per my knowledge you should use IP in the Class C range ... without that the router will not accept the Static IP also ....

Similar Messages

"Invalid Static Route" - WRT320N

Hello,
I can't add any static routes on my WRT320N (Updated to latest firmware), it immediately gives me the "Invalid Static Route" message.
The route am trying to add has work WRT160N.
Any ideas
Thanks
Khalil

No it's not on the same subnet.
as I said the route I'm trying to add already worked on WRT160N with the same config.
Firmware 1.0.03 build 10 (Release Date: August 13, 2009) release notes includes the following:
   1. Windows 7 support
   2. FIxed issue with Radius server settings
   3. Fixed Static route where some entry can not be added.
   4. Fixed configuration via Network Magic
   5. FIxed PPTP internet connection type not working correctly with Connect on demand.
   6. Fixed issue with blocking NMH remote access from working
   7. Fixed some HND services that may break connect on Demand option.
   8. Fixed various HND issues.
   9. Fixed some failed case with UPnP.
The strange thing is my router status page lists the firmware as:
Firmware Version: v1.0.03 build 010 Jul 24, 2009
notice the difference in dates.
I did upgrade to latest firmware my self, so it shouldn't be an issue may the time between testing the build internally and releasing it publicly.
But as you can see number 3 is about static routes.

Linksys E3000 Invalid Static Route

I just got a Linksys E3000 to replace my old WRt54G router. I have another Linksys router configured as a bridge and all is working well now. My issue is that I am trying to add a static route to the new E3000 for my subnet behind the bridge and it keeps telling me "Invalid Static Route". Now I have the ethernet interface IP set to 192.168.1.1 with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.128. the static route I am trying to add is
Destination LAN IP: 192.168.0.128
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.128
Gateway: 192.168.1.7 (2nd router configured as bridge)
This static route works great on the existing router, but the E3000 will not take it.

I would also be very interested in seeing this resolved. I have spent a couple of days trying to resolve and Linksys support advise "we can't help you with this - too complicated for us". I am trying to solve exactly the same problem. Bridged modem is on 192.168.0.1 and I am using standard subnet mask for class C adressing (255.255.255.0). Intuitively i would have thought the following would do the trick:
Destination LAN address would be: 192.168.0.0
Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 192.168.1.1 (the address of the ES3000 router)
I consider myself a novice here however and welcome any solution. Linksys only suggestion was to put everything on the same network which requires the DHCP server to run from the modem .... no longer really bridged and what i was trying to avoid. I want this functionality to be performed by the router.
Thanks in advance (P.S. the ES3000 is a week old and has the next to latest firmare. The notes for the latest do not appear to adress this issue so i haven't reflashed it at this stage).

LinkSys E1000 invalid static route!

Hi I'm from Russia
Your product is stable but not profitable
For the price your customers is easier to buy a model Zyxel
Correct firmware for the static route, or Dynamic Routing (RIP)
LinkSys E1000
Enabled - Dynamic Routing (RIP) NO RESULTS!
ZyXEL KEENETIC LITE - automatic routing!

What exactly you are trying to do? Since, all Linksys routers are set to Class C subnet.
If you will try to enter IP address of different Subnet the router will not respond..

Problems setting up static routing

HI
I'm having a problem setting up static routing. I keep getting the message "invalid static route". I have an E1550 router and my frimware is up to date. I have tried a few different gateway addresses ie 192.168.1.1, 127.0.0.1 and my router's address on the net, but I keep getting the same message. Has anyone else had this problem and been able to fix it?

I think the E1550 router supports LAN to LAN routing provided that you have two local networks. If you only have a plain modem and the E1550, I believe you can't do Static routing on that type of setup. Found this link that might help: http://kb.linksys.com/Linksys/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=12a84336a124498eb5d6f0204b85191e_17589.xml&pid=80&...

Static routing

Hello,
I set up a network (192.168.1.0), with a wrt160n router. I want to create a second network (192.168.2.0) and use the router to set up a static route between the two networks. Whenever I try to set up a static route and save the settings I get the error "invalid static route", although I think I use the correct data:
destination lan ip: 192.168.2.0
subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 192.168.2.1 (static ip of the router in the second nw)
interface: lan & wireless
I already did an upgrade of the firmware but to no avail.
Anybody any ideas?
Best regards,
Christophe

Are you setting the first network with 192.168.1.0 or 192.168.0.1....?
Make the first network at 192.168.0.1 and second at 192.168.0.2.Follow this link for Static Routing.

Linksys wrt320n can't save static route

Hi,
I have a problem when trying to configure my wrt320n , I put in the exact same config. as I had with my wrt54g, and I do mean the exact same, even the name and all, but when I try to save the config on Advance Routing I get the message "Invalid static route", I think it's a bug, but has anyone got this problem or solved it?
Any help at all is appreciated.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Internet Setup
Internet IP Address: 190.4.31.222
                                Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.252
                                Gateway: 190.4.31.221
                                Static DNS 1:     190.4.6.194
                                Static DNS 2:     . . .
LAN Setup:
Local IP Address: 192.168.0.5
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0

Cannot add static routes wrt350n

Router has latest firmware and was just set to default values. I cannot add a static route, says "static route invalid" no matter what address I input (keeping it simple, trying 192.168.1.XXX)
I have never had this problem with any other router and I'm thinking it's broken. Thought I'd ask here to make sure I wasn't missing a setting before I throw this thing out the window.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks, Nick.

Thanks for the help, it is appreciated...
I would like to use a static IP address for my LAN multimedia server, MythTV reccommends a static address for the backend server. I have also always used Static IP addresses for my LAN.
I am a little confused, and my networking is very rusty so please bear with me. Perhaps I have not provided enough information, because I do not fully understand your response. I don't understand how subnetting is relevant.
My network is a simple home network, with one router separating my LAN from the cloud. I have one LAN, no subnetting, 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0.
Every home router I have used before I have set up the LAN portion like this... And it has always worked in the past...
gateway: 192.168.1.1/24.
static routes 192.168.1.(2-5)/24 for my stationary hosts.
dhcp range 192.168.1.(10-15)/24 for laptops and guests.
In response:
1) Yes it is LAN traffic, but the hosts still need addresses, right? Not sure what you're getting at here.
2) Not sure what you mean... example host 192.168.1.20/24, and the router 192.168.1.1/24are both within the 192.168.1.0/24 network, right? So requests from the cloud are broadcast to all in my LAN, right? How is this relevant?
3) I thought the gateway (on my only router) has to be part of the LAN addressing. By Linksys/Cisco default, the router LAN side gateway is 192.168.1.1/24 and it sends out dhcp addresses to 192.168.1.(100-149)/24.
Am I severly confused or are we just on the wrong page?

Unable to create static route

Hello,
I am trying to setup my Linksys WRT55AG router in Router Operation Mode.
My configuration is as follows:
Internet Side:
WAN-192.168.0.1/24
gw 192.168.0.2
Internal Side:
LAN-10.10.10.1/24
In the Gateway mode, it seems to function as designed while in the Router mode, I am unable to create the following static route:
172.16.0.0/24 gateway 192.168.0.2 WAN interface.
The error states the following:
Invalid gateway address: not in 10.10.10.1/255.255.255.0 network
This makes no sense to me unless I am missing something here?

If you change the router into router mode you turn off NAT. This means you'll see the LAN IP addresses 10.10.10.* on the outside of the router. The reason why you cannot ping anything in the 192.168.0.* subnet anymore is simply because the devices connecte in 192.168.0.* don't have routes for 10.10.10.0 or better they forward it to the default gateway. For instance, if you ping 192.168.0.50 from 10.10.10.5 with the router in router mode:
10.10.10.5: 192.168.0.50 is not in the LAN, thus it sends the packet to the default gateway 10.10.10.1
10.10.10.1: the router is connected to 192.168.0.0/24 on the WAN side. It will use ARP to find the MAC address of 192.168.0.50 on the WAN side and will send the packet to 192.168.0.50
192.168.0.50: receives the ping request and send the ping reply to 10.10.10.5.
192.168.0.50: 10.10.10.5 is not in the LAN. There is no static route for 10.10.10.5 available. Therefore the packet is forwarded to the default gateway which is 192.168.0.2 in your LAN.
192.168.0.2: 10.10.10.5 is not known to be connected to either the LAN or WAN side. Therefore the router will forward the packet its own default gateway which will be the gateway router of your ISP.
ISP router: the router will simply drop packets with private source or destination addresses, thus it will drop a packet for 10.10.10.5
The problem is that neither the computers inside 192.168.0.* nor the router 192.168.0.2 knows about the existence of the 10.10.10.0/24 subnet inside your LAN. You have to add static routes on router to get access into the 10.10.10.0/24 subnet.
The reason why it works in gateway mode, i.e. with NAT enabled, is simply because above the router 10.10.10.1 will do something differently:
10.10.10.1: **The router does NAT. It will first replace the source IP address of the packet from 10.10.10.1 with its own "public" IP address which is 192.168.0.1.** The router is connected to 192.168.0.0/24 on the WAN side. It will use ARP to find the MAC address of 192.168.0.50 on the WAN side and will send the packet to 192.168.0.50.
Note, that the ICMP ping received on the target has a source IP address of 192.168.0.1 now instead of 10.10.10.5 as before. The router and computers in side 192.168.0.* all know how to send something to 192.168.0.1.
Regarding the extra route: packets not matched with any other static router will be forwarded to the default gateway. The default gateway is 192.168.0.2 on your Linksys. You don't need the route. The router should not show this strange error message because the route for itself is O.K. but adding the route won't change the routing of the router.

Cannot remove misstyped static route

I have misstyped a static route (netmask is wrong) and cannot delete:
gw-kuvasz#sh run | include route
route alba-dmz 0.246.102.79 25.255.255.255 10.63.201.110 1
If I try to remove get the following error message:
gw-kuvasz(config)# no route alba-dmz 0.246.102.79 25.255.255.255 10.63.201.110
ERROR: Invalid network address 0.246.102.79, cannot add route
What to do?
Thank for the help: Joseph

Hi,
Seems both the network address and mask are wrong.
There are not that many commands related to routes you can use
This seems like some bug. I dont know why it is giving a message of adding a route when you are removing one.
I tried this with my home ASA5505 (8.4(5)) and it wont let me even add that route to begin with.
One command you could try (risks involed) is to remove all the routes regarding "alba-dmz" interface on the ASA. This command doesnt specify the exact route to be removed but rather removes all static routes from that interface so it has its own risks.
ASA(config)# clear configure route alba-dmz
Depending on your network setup you might want to do this outside normal working hours since you need to remove all routes from that interface. I am not sure if it will work.
One idea is naturally booting up the ASA if you havent saved the configuration
Or perhaps trying to boot the ASA with a configuration file that doesnt include the route
- Jouni

Default static route and Null 0

Hi Everyone,
Need to clear some doubts for below setup
Switch 3550A is connected to Internet Router and has OSPF nei relationship with it.
3550A#                      sh run int fa0/11
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 272 bytes
interface FastEthernet0/11
description OSPF LAN Connection to 2691 Router Interface Fas 0/1
no switchport
ip address 192.168.5.2 255.255.255.254
sh ip route shows
3550A#sh ip route
Gateway of last resort is 192.168.5.3 to network 0.0.0.0
O*E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 192.168.5.3, 20:39:56, FastEthernet0/11
3550A#
All is working fine.
For testing purposes i config below static route on 3550A
ip default-network 192.168.1.0
ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
After above change
3550A#           sh ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
S*   192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Null0
O*E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 192.168.5.3, 20:38:38, FastEthernet0/11
Now i can not ping to internet as below
3550A#ping 4.2.2.2
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 4.2.2.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
When we ping from Switch then source IP is always the Outside interface IP right?
So in this case Switch is using which IP as source?
Ping to internet is not working as default network is set to 192.168.1.0 and all request goes to this IP and then it goes to
Null interface right?
Extended ping works fine as below
3550A#ping
Protocol [ip]:
Target IP address: 4.2.2.2
Repeat count [5]:
Datagram size [100]:
Timeout in seconds [2]:
Extended commands [n]: y
Source address or interface: 192.168.5.2
Type of service [0]:
Set DF bit in IP header? [no]:
Validate reply data? [no]:
Data pattern [0xABCD]:
Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]:
Sweep range of sizes [n]:
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 4.2.2.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 192.168.5.2
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 76/79/80 ms
Second thing to confirm is this ping works because 192.168.5.2 is directly connected to Internet Router interface?
Regards
MAhesh

Hi Mahesh,
When we ping from Switch then source IP is always the Outside interface IP right?
That is correct. By default it is always the outgoing interface on the device unless you specify it differently.
Ping to internet is not working as default network is set to 192.168.1.0 and all request goes to this IP and then it goes to
Null interface right?
That is correct. Null0 can't be used as next-hop.
Second thing to confirm is this ping works because 192.168.5.2 is directly connected to Internet Router interface?
No, that is because 192.168.5.0/30 is NATed. Remember 192.168.x.x address is a private segment and cannot access the Internet unless NAT is used.
HTH
Reza

Advertise implicit-null label for static routes

Hi, I want to ask if there is any way to change the label or stop adveritise label for an static route. Normally LDP advertises an Implicit Null label for directly connected routes. We want to do similar thing for static routes.
We need to do this is because somehow we need to do rate-limit on the PE interface connecting to the core network instead of the interface connecting to CE. As the incoming packets still got labelled, the rate-limit is skipped. So we want to stop the PE creates label for the static routes or advertises them with implicit null label. Thanks in advance.

Calvin,
Bear in mind that if you only enter the "no mpls ldp advertise-label" command, LDP will stop propagating all labels, which might not ba what you want. If you selectively want to propagate certain labels, then you need to also use "mpls advertise label for " as Shivlu suggested.
Regards,

Check for Null in Mediator Static Routing filter

Using Expression Builder for Mediator component how can I check the values for NULL in a particular XML element. In my case the XSD is
<xs:complexType name="OdsCadDataSet">
<xs:choice>
<xs:element name="odsCadCase" type="OdsCadCase" minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="1"/>
<xs:element name="odsCadEvent" type="OdsCadEvent" minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="1"/>
<xs:element name="odsCadUnitStatus" type="OdsCadUnitStatus"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
I want to check in expression builder of mediator whether odsCase, odsCadEvent, odsCadUnitStatus is been processed. I have three static routing for each element and plan to put filter which checks is odsCadCase is null and so forth. How to have this use case.
Thanks
Edited by: user5108636 on 28/06/2010 00:15

helo, i have same problem here...
I have a xsd:choice on request like this:
<message>
<properties>
<property name="tracking.compositeInstanceId" value="80003"/>
<property name="tracking.ecid" value="0000J1MQVAZBDC^5lVg8yZ1DtZWJ000T5r"/>
<property name="transport.http.remoteAddress" value="10.106.17.137"/>
</properties>
<parts>
<part name="request">
<ns1:parametrosConsultaGuia>
<ns1:guiaCompensacaoRequest>
<ns1:anoGuia>2011</ns1:anoGuia>
<ns1:numeroGuia>314</ns1:numeroGuia>
<ns1:codigoFatoGerador>6</ns1:codigoFatoGerador>
<ns1:codigoPorte>77011</ns1:codigoPorte>
</ns1:guiaCompensacaoRequest>
<ns1:guiaComplementarRequest>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:classeEmbarcacao/>
<ns1:codigoPorte/>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
<ns1:fatoGerador/>
<ns1:numeroTransacaoInternet/>
</ns1:guiaComplementarRequest>
<ns1:guiaDesarquivamentoRequest>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
<ns1:idPessoa/>
</ns1:guiaDesarquivamentoRequest>
<ns1:guiaDividaAtivaRequest>
<ns1:numeroDebito/>
<ns1:codigoUsuario/>
</ns1:guiaDividaAtivaRequest>
<ns1:guiaNormalRequest>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
<ns1:fatoGerador/>
<ns1:numeroTransacaoInternet/>
</ns1:guiaNormalRequest>
<ns1:guiaReferenciaRequest>
<ns1:numeroGuiaPai/>
<ns1:anoGuiaPai/>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:classeEmbarcacao/>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
</ns1:guiaReferenciaRequest>
<ns1:guiaRemanescenteRequest>
<ns1:numeroDebito/>
<ns1:codigoUsuario/>
</ns1:guiaRemanescenteRequest>
<ns1:guiaMultaRequest>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:dataVencimento/>
<ns1:valorMulta/>
<ns1:percentualDesconto/>
<ns1:percentualAcrescimo/>
</ns1:guiaMultaRequest>
</ns1:parametrosConsultaGuia>
</part>
</parts>
</message>
I tried everything to check if some of the requests are filled but allways mediator returns null:
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaReferenciaRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaCompensacao.getGuiaCompensacao"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "$in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaCompensacaoRequest != ''" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaRemanescenteService.getGuiaRemanescente"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaRemanescenteRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaMultaService.gerarBoleto"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaMultaRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaDividaAtiva.getGuiaDividaAtiva"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaDividaAtivaRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaDesarquivamento.getGuiaDesarquivamento"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaDesarquivamentoRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaComplementarService.gerarBoleto"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaComplementarRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaNormalService.gerarBoleto"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaNormalRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>

Is there a way to add a static route in an Ipod touch ?

I am trying to get the ipod touch to configure correctly for our wireless network.
The wireless side does not provide DNS or DHCP directly . Rather this is done from a different
subnet . This assists to a small extent with our wirless security in that the attacker must also know
routing address and DNS and DHCP addresses to steal web access. In windows or Linux this can be done
by route add (DHCP IP Address) netmask 255.255.255.255 (gateway IP address)
and route add (DNS IP Address) netmask 255.255.255.255 (gateway IP address)
and manually specifying the DNS and DHCP addresses. Even if i manually enter the
the IP address without a simple static route I will not get DNS services across the gateway.
I am no apple expert but route add has been in use since the internet was still on 2 wheels
surely this can still be done ?
Thanks in advance

hi!
have you seen javax.swing.JMenuItem ?
and have a look into
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/uiswing/components/menu.html
:)

Setting up static routing in sa520. Im stuck.

Hello,
I finally got my cisco router and all excited about it i tried to set it up. Everything went fine until i wanted a local machine to get its own IP adress that is reachable from the outside.
Basicly i used static IP setting in the wan/ip4v menu. This worked great and with the router assigning dhcp too all computers.
Now all the local computers has internet connection and they share one ip adress on the outside.
As for where im stuck. I have a xserve with 2 networkcards. It runs a FTP server which we use local but we also have customers needing to reach it from the outside. The local FTP works but im having difficulties assigning a outside IP too it. Our ISP has provided 5 different ipadresses.
I have tried to do this in 2 different ways where the second way is preferable.
first try:
Use the optional port as a second wan. give it the same settings as the first wan got but another ip-adress.
Then connect the xserves outside network card directly too that wan port and use dhcp. This did not work.
second try:
Assign a static routing from the wan2(optional port) too the local ipadress for the xserve.
Can someone elaborate on how this should be done?
Thank you.
Edit:
Later today i will try this firewall rule.
http://bildr.no/view/580301
Basicly i want to forward any connections from wan2 too 192.168.1.33 which is my server. Does that look correct?

Thank you for your quick reply.
Im using version 1.1.21.
Im actully quite sure that its a user problem rather then firmware error. It´s the first time i evern touch a Cisco router and i havn´t done that much networking.
I can show you how i did it on my xserve. Maybe you can elaborate on how i can do it the same way.
    redirect_port
            proto
            tcp
            targetIP
            192.168.1.50
            targetPortRange
            80
            aliasIP
            77.40.XXX.220
            aliasPortRange
            8888
Basicly it says push whatever trafic from ip 77.40.xxx.220 too 192.168.1.50 on the local network.
How can i do the same thing on my cisco router? It´s a NAT ip-forward rule.
Edit:
Screenshot shows what i have been trying.
I have chosen optional wan which is set to use another external IP adress but this does not work. It would be so much easier if i could just type in the external IP adress there and use the same gateway, dns as the main WAN.
Added config aswell.
Thank you.

Invalid Static Route

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for