Inventory transactions - Work Order Less Completions

Hi,
I am looking for some information on 'work order less completion' (WOLC) type of transaction in inventory (type of inventory transaction).
Please point me to the right link where I can get some info on this. This is an urgent need, hence request you to respond immediately.
Thank you very much, in advance

After enabling debug mode to statement level we pinpointed the problem:
The record is failing on interface completion (wip_flowUtil_priv.processFlowInterfaceRecords), when calling validateInterfaceCompletion procedure.
The exact reason is unknown because the procedure writes the error code directly into not commited record (column error_code, mtl_transactions_interface table).
It seems we are not the only one:
Metalink, Bug 9801561, Status: 11 - Code Bug (Response/Resolution)
Let's wait and see.
Regards,
Kristjan
Edited by: user10676522 on 2.7.2010 2:59

Similar Messages

  • Work order less completion

    Hi ,
    By mistake we have performed WIP Assembly Return through Work order less completion, due to this On hand got reduced.
    Could you please advice how to reverse this transaction.
    Regards
    Ravi

    Hi Ravi,
    Yes, system will not allow to transact the same schedule number again. New schedule number will be generated automatically when you perform the WIP Assy Completion transaction using Work Order-Less Completions window and all the accounting entries will be balanced in the system.
    Regards
    Shabbir

  • Work Order Less Completion Form-Help

    Hello Guys i have a question on WIP- Work Order Less Completion Form.
    In the form when we enter the assemebly item and go to Components-->Lot/Serial, In Lot entry form there is a field called Lot number which has LOV and also allows user to enter his own Value what he needs.
    My question is is there any controls in Oracle where we can prevent user from entering his value in the LOt number field,instead he has to select it from LOV only.
    Please help me on this.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Please see if these documents help.
    Note: 112055.1 - Lot/Serial Control Setups
    Note: 338189.1 - When Receiving an RMA, Lot Number LOV Shows All Lots
    Regards,
    Hussein

  • Inventory transaction worker request completing with error.

    when running Inventory transaction worker concuurent request completing with error.
    Here I attached the error message ..
    Oracle Inventory: Version : 11.5.0 - Development
    Copyright (c) 1979, 1999, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
    INCTCW module: Inventory transaction worker
    Current system time is 10-OCT-2010 08:22:07
    No completion options were requested.
    Output is not being printed because:
    The print option has been disabled for this report.
    Concurrent request completed
    Current system time is 10-OCT-2010 08:22:08
    Regards
    ***SBJ***

    Hi, Did relinking fix your issue?
    Thanks.
    Hi,
    I have the same problem. The Inventory transaction errors out randomly. Did relinking fix your issue?
    Thanks
    A/A
    Hi,
    No,I didn't tried to relink INCTCW.
    Please try to relink the file and see if it helps.
    Also, please go through the doc referenced above and check the database log file for any errors.
    Thanks,
    Hussein
    user13098774 wrote:when running Inventory transaction worker concuurent request completing with error.
    Here I attached the error message ..
    Oracle Inventory: Version : 11.5.0 - Development
    Copyright (c) 1979, 1999, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
    INCTCW module: Inventory transaction worker
    Current system time is 10-OCT-2010 08:22:07
    No completion options were requested.
    Output is not being printed because:
    The print option has been disabled for this report.
    Concurrent request completed
    Current system time is 10-OCT-2010 08:22:08
    Regards
    ***SBJ***

  • Inventory Transaction Worker

    Can Someone help me on the performance of Inventory transaction Worker?? It takes about 8 mins to complete for each subinventory
    (around 200 rows) and we have over 200 subinventories... We have tried all available options...
    Oracle Support has asked us to address post this query to the forum as this seemed, as the functionality of the worker seems to be Serial(one by one)....
    Suggestions are most welcome as this is a bottleneck to our Project

    Sofia,
    Did you ever a resolution regarding the performance issues you were having with the inventory transaction workers? We are also experiencing a similar problem with performance and I would appreciate any advice you may have on the subject.
    Regards,
    Niels Gudegast.

  • Inventory transaction worker (INCTCW) Material transaction Interface Manage

    Hello,
    We have issue "Inventory transaction worker" (INCTCW) failed, we want to notified if its failed again, is there a way I can get notification (email) if this request failed.
    Thanks
    Ed

    Pls post apps and database version along with OS ?
    what was the error in log file ?
    thanks

  • Subscriber keeps reporting Work order IN completed.

    We have a Zenworks 6.5sp1a site with 1 distributer and 15 subscribers on
    remote site's.
    One subscriber keeps reporting Work order IN completed / Receiving
    distribution...... / Received magic data length = 8 . This results in a
    very large TED.log, sometimes it grows to almost 2Gb. Normaly, due to
    extended logging, it will be around 200Mb. 200Mb is readable by most
    utilities, 2Gb will not load in an editor or it will take a while to load.
    Has someone an idea what causes the multiple reports of Work order IN
    completed?
    Thanks, Erik

    Well, with loglevel set to 6 you'll get lots of messages. The workorder in
    message indicates that the distributor received a responce from the
    subscriber, quit notmal traffic.
    Off topic: Erik If I'm right you are working for a company that has an
    office in Capelle (NL), is that right? Are you working from the CPL office
    or at another location (I'm cycling along your CPL office almost every day
    Ron
    <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Ron.
    >
    > The loglevel on the distributor is 6 for filelog. The loglevel on the
    > subscriber is the same as the other subscribers.
    > The only difference I discovered is the attribute LoginTime on the other-
    > page of the subscriber object. I will take a closer look on that one.
    >
    > Erik
    >
    >> Hmm, what is the loglevel on your distributor?
    >>
    >> Ron
    >>
    >> <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >> news:[email protected]...
    >> > The distributor is scheduled from 19.00 to 19.15 and the channels are
    >> > scheduled from 20.00 to 8.00.
    >> > The "faulty" subscriber keeps sending statusreports to the distributor,
    >> > causing the ted.log on the distributor to grow up to 1 or 2Gb.
    >> >
    >> > The distributions go well, even on the "faulty" subscriber. I like to
    > know
    >> > what the messages mean, I can not find anything in the knowledgebase.
    >> >
    >> > Erik
    >> >
    >> >> I'm wondering how you configured your schedules, if this is causing
    > the
    >> >> TED.LOG to grow to 2Gb, I wonder how often you refresh your
    > distributor
    >> > and
    >> >> open the channel.
    >> >>
    >> >> Do you get the distribution directory on the subscriber? Does the
    >> >> distfile.ted grow over time?
    >> >>
    >> >> Ron
    >> >>
    >> >> <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >> >> news:[email protected]...
    >> >> > We have a Zenworks 6.5sp1a site with 1 distributer and 15
    > subscribers
    >> > on
    >> >> > remote site's.
    >> >> > One subscriber keeps reporting Work order IN completed / Receiving
    >> >> > distribution...... / Received magic data length = 8 . This results
    > in a
    >> >> > very large TED.log, sometimes it grows to almost 2Gb. Normaly, due
    > to
    >> >> > extended logging, it will be around 200Mb. 200Mb is readable by most
    >> >> > utilities, 2Gb will not load in an editor or it will take a while to
    >> > load.
    >> >> >
    >> >> > Has someone an idea what causes the multiple reports of Work order
    > IN
    >> >> > completed?
    >> >> >
    >> >> > Thanks, Erik
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> >
    >>
    >>
    >

  • Inventory Transaction Worker - Error

    Hi
    Error : Transaction quantity has an incorrect sign for the given transaction action*
    Getting the above mentioned error when I submit the conc program"Inventory Transaction Worker"
    Any suggestion will be of great help
    Regards
    Yram

    Yram,
    Have you checked this thread? Re:Item Onhand Quantity Migration - negative Quantity Error
    No similar issues are reported on MOS website, so you may log a SR for this error.
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • INVENTORY TRANSACTION WORKER가 PARALLEL로 실행되지 않는 문제

    제품 : MFG_INV
    작성날짜 : 2003-04-25
    INVENTORY TRANSACTION WORKER가 PARALLEL로 실행되지 않는 문제
    ==================================================
    PURPOSE
    Serial 하게만 실행되는 Inventory Transaction Worker를 Parallel하게 실행될 수 있도록 한다.
    Problem Description
    Profile Option - Concurrent: Sequential Requests = 'No'임에도 불구하고 Inventory Trnasaction Worker가 Parallel 하게 실행되지 않고 Sequential 하게만 실행된다.
    예를 들면,
    -. Inventory Trnasaction Manager가 3 Target processes로 setup.
    -. 각 Material Transaction Worker가 100 rows를 handle하게 setup.
    500 rows가 동시에 실행되는 경우 Inventory trnasaction worker 3개가 parallel하게 작업하지 않고 한 개씩 sequential하게 작업한다.
    Workaround
    Solution Description
    WIP move transaction manager code에 concurrent single thread 값이 'Y'로 ssetting 되어 INV transaction worker가 parallel하게 실행되지 않았다.
    WIP move transaction manager가 active 상태에도 INV transaction worker가 parallel하게 실행시키기 위해서 patch 2676024 를 적용한다.
    Apply patch 2676024.
    Reference Documents
    bug 2492785

  • Inventory Transaction Worker erroring without any log messages.

    Hi,
    When I try to run Inventory Transaction Worker, it is erroring out without any log/output messages. In metalink, it has been mentioned that when there are any garbage characters in the input data, it errors out.
    I checked the input data also. It seems to be fine.
    Could any of you please help me in this regard???
    Thanks.

    HI
    EBS - 11.5.10.2
    OS - AIX 5.3
    This was working fine before and working fine in PROD.issue is in cloned instance
    Initaillial I was getting following error
    This concurrent manager cannot run the following registered, immediate
    concurrent programs because they are not linked to this concurrent
    manager's library "INVLIBR"
    Cause: The immediate concurrent programs listed have been registered
    th
         Application Concurrent Program
              INV INCDCM
              BOM CMCCTM
    Followed the note you provided and started getting error as mentioned in pervious post.
    Now I am not able to add WICTWS to lib 'INVLIBR' as its of PL/sql type executable
    Thanks

  • Submit Inventory Transaction Worker from PL/SQL package

    Hi,
    I would like to know if it's possible to submit the Inventory Transaction Worker (INCTCW) from a PL/SQL program (package) define as a concurrent program.
    Regards

    Hi,
    I believe you should be able to do that using FND_REQUEST.SUBMIT_REQUEST (search MOS for examples on how to use this package).
    How to Submit a Report Set from a Custom Form [ID 104260.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Inventory transaction worker issue

    Hi Team,
    while doing the complete job I am calling process tranaction inteface through my custom program but the Material transaction manager in acvtive only. The process transaction Interface prgoram triggering the Inventory tranasction worker in twice but the first time its completed with normal and the second time program errored out with log messsage says error message Output is not being printed because.
    why its calling twice can u please let us know.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Pavan
    Edited by: 1008898 on May 30, 2013 7:22 AM

    Pls post apps and database version along with OS ?
    what was the error in log file ?
    thanks

  • Complete work orders without complete notifications from Overall Completion

    We have a work order assigned to a notification type and we need to complete the work order from the overall completion transaction  (IW42) without completing the notification when clicking on technical completion button.
    Is it possible?

    You can check with your netweaver team if this could be controlled from user authorizations. Do check if the following Business Transactions are available against the tcode "iw42"
    PMM2     Put notification in process     
    PMM4     Complete notification     
    PMM6     Put notif. in process again     
    I hope this will help.
    Regards

  • Preventing Deletion indicator in PR once work order is completed

    Dear colleagues,
    Users create work orders in IW31 with the choice of external service; control key is PM02. Once work order is saved purchase requisition (PR) is created in background. With reference to PR, purchase order (PO) is created by purchase specialist.
    When work order is technically completed (system status TECO) deletion indicator is set to PR line item(s) automatically which result in undesirable situations since PR(s) has subject to release strategy in our system.
    Is it possible to prevent setting deletion indicator in PR once reference work order is technically completed?
    Kind regards
    Melih

    Hi,
    In this case that behavior has negative effects on PR Workflow process because in our system when PR(s) is created it is subject to release strategy according to preconfigured conditions.
    Once the order is technically completed (TECO) deletion indicator is set to PR line item(s) automatically meanwhile release strategy tab is disappeared from PR line item(s).
    In addition to that in ME54N system gives the MEPO822 (Purchase requisition XXXXXXXXX cannot be released) message even PR is approved before the order is technically completed.
    Kind regards
    Melih

  • EAM Work order completion issue

    Hi guys
    We have a requirement where we need to complete a work order using an API call .
    There are times where even when all operations are completed the users dont change the status to complete.
    I've tried using the EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.PROCESS_WO to change the status to different statuses and it works for some statuses,
    but when I try to change the status of the WO from released to complete it gives me the following error.
    change from 3 to 4 not poss
    oddly this call does change the system status of the work order to complete but not the status type
    any ideas , suggestions?
    Thanks
    Dan

    user eam_completion API
    take care
    Aamir

Maybe you are looking for

  • Oracle Fault Management Framework - how to intercept first invocation

    I know the Oracle Fault Management Framework is only activated on faults that occur on invokes. Which is fine for all internal calls. However, is there any way to get the framework to be activated on the very first invoke? I want to be able to get th

  • [REQUESTS] Vbios - MSI R9 290X Gaming 4G

    Model: MSI R9 290X GAMING 4G S/N: 602-V308-01SB1312025606 Current version (BIOS): not original (My card is a second hand) Thank you!

  • Thumbnails Loading

    I use Aperture with the library on a networked-harddrive. When opening a project I wait for Aperture to finish loading the thumbnails because the app is very sluggish when it's processing thumbnails. Once the thumbnails are loaded I begin viewing, an

  • How to Install Java Studio Creator

    Hello: I have a question regardin on how can I optimize the resources that my enterprise already have. I.e I can put an X86 Server (i mean really a server) to be an application server, however i can do It with the Java Studio Enterprise, but not on t

  • Peoplesoft upgrade delta site

    I went to a session at OpenWorld where the instructor talked about a tool where you could plug in your current PeopleSoft version and a future version and it would tell you the added features from one version to the next. For example, currently we ar