Inventory Valuation : By MTO scenario but produciton based on WBS

Dear All,
Our Client wants to have budget control at each stage of production so we planned to have ETO Scenario however; client want to have costing at Sales order as we are doing Variant Configration. SO, Is it possible to have flow of inventory value as per Sales Order Costing by perform Sales Order Costing & doing production declaration based on WBS Element?
Thanks,
Sneha

Hi Sneha
I never heard of such a requirement... but you can try as below
1. In your Account Assignment category (AAC), specify Special Stock as "Q-Project Stock" and
2. In your Requirement class - Specify the Valuation indicator as "M - Separate Valuation with ref to sales order/project"
Assign this AAC in Req Class and Req class in a Req Type...
Your sales order must be created with ref to the project
But frankly speaking, having budgetary control on the production process sounds bit strange to me!
Regards
Ajay M

Similar Messages

Steps for execution of valuated and unvaluated for MTO scenario

Hi,
Can any one provide the steps for execution of valuated and unvaluated for MTO scenario.
regards,
RAM

Hi,
Please find below the details about Valuated and non-valuated Sale Order scenarios:
SAP Scenario 1 - Valuated Sale Order Stock u2013 with Sale Order Controlling u2013 (MTO, ATO and ETO with VC)
1     Enquiry
2     Opportunity
3     Quotation (Creation and Approval). In case of ETO u2013 BPO is created and updated in quotation (condition type)
4     Creation of Sale Order
5     MRP Run u2013 Creation of Planned Order u2013 Creation of Production Order and Purchase Order
6     External Procurement u2013 Goods Receipt     ROH Inventory A/c Dr (BS)
     To GR/IR A/c Cr (P&L)
7     Material Consumption to Production Order     In FI:
ROH con. A/c Dr (P&L)
    To ROH Inventory A/c Cr (BS)
Same is the case with HALB
In CO:
Cost of Material is debited to Production Order
8     Activity Consumption to Production Order     No FI Posting
In CO:
Production Order is debited and cost center is credited with activity cost
9     Goods Receipt from Production Order     FG Inventory A/c Dr (BS)
   To COGM A/c Cr (P&L)
10     Delivery to customer     In-Transit A/c   Dr. (BS)
   To FG Inventory A/c Cr (BS)
11     Invoicing to customer     In FI:
Customer A/c Dr (BS)
   To Revenue A/c Cr (P&L)
COGS A/c   Dr (P&L)
    To In-Transit A/c Cr (BS)
In CO:
COGS and Revenue are posted to COPA
     Period end closing u2013 Production Order
12     Revaluation of activity prices     Production Order and Cost Center will be debited or credited as the case may be
13     Calculation of WIP     In FI:
WIP A/c Dr. (BS)
To Change in WIP A/c Cr (P&L)
If the Order is completed:
In FI:
Change in WIP A/c   Dr(P&L)
   To WIP A/c Cr (BS)
14     Calculation of Variances     Variances are Calculated on the Production Order. No FI or CO entries
15     Settlement to Sale Order     Production Order and Sales Order will get debited/credited depending on whether they are positive or negative variances
Period end closing u2013 Sale Order
16     Result analysis at Sale Order     Result Analysis run will identify the status of the sale order and will enable the postings to COPA at the time of settlement
17     Settlement of Sale Order
In FI:
Variances A/c Dr (P&L)
To COGS Account Cr (P&L)
(It would be otherwise if variances are positive)
In CO:
COGS, Revenue and Variances are settled to COPA
SAP Scenario 2 u2013 Non-valuated Sale Order Stock u2013 with Sale Order Controlling
Process Step     Business Process Flow     Value Flow u2013 FI/CO
1     Enquiry
2     Opportunity
3     Quotation (Creation and Approval)
4     Creation of Sale Order
5     MRP Run u2013 Creation of Planned Order u2013 Creation of Production Order and Purchase Order
6     External Procurement u2013 Goods Receipt     In FI:
Consumption A/c   Dr (P&L)
   To GR/IR A/c Cr (P&L)
In CO:
Material costs will directly get posted to Sale Order
7     Material Consumption to Production Order     Not applicable
8     Activity Consumption to Production Order     In FI:
No Entry
In CO:
Activity Costs are posted to Production Order
9     Goods Receipt from Production Order     Only Material Document for movement of goods will be there. The stock is neither valuated in CO nor in FI
10     Delivery to customer     Just goods movement from sale order stock to customer. No value postings in FI and CO
11     Invoicing to customer     In FI:
Customer A/c Dr (BS)
   To Revenue Cr (P&L)
In CO:
COGS and Revenue get posted to Sale Order
     Period end closing u2013 Production Order
12     Revaluation of activity prices     Prodn Order and Cost Center will be debited or credited as the case may be
13     Calculation of WIP     No WIP
14     Calculation of Variances     No Variances
15     Settlement of costs to Sale Order     All the costs accumulated in Production Order gets collected to Sale Order
16     Settlement of Variances     No Variances in Production Order
     Period end closing u2013 Sale Order
17     Result analysis at Sale Order     In FI
WIP A/c Dr. (BS)
To Change in WIP A/c Cr (P&L)
If the Order is completed:
Change in WIP A/c   Dr (P&L)
   To WIP A/c Cr (BS)
No CO postings will happen
18     Settlement of Sale Order     COGS, Revenue and other direct sale order related values will get posed to PA.
Best Regards
Surya

Difference betweeen valuated and unevaluated at MTO scenario

Hi
Can any one explain about valuated and unevaluated in MTO scenario.
Settlement happened at production order level or Sales order level?
Regards,
RAM

Make to order

No Accounting Document generated for goods issue in case of MTO scenario

Hi all,
I have MTO scenario & the industry is trading. So I have all trading goods. In SPRO - Sales & Distribution - Availability Check and Transfer of Requirements - Transfer of Requirements - Determination Of Requirement Types Using Transaction I have determined requirement type as KE.
In material master I have used strategy group as 20 for Make to order scenario. In the settings "Determination Of Requirement Types Using Transaction" I have determined the requirement type as "KE".
The requirement type "KE" determines a requirement class "040 - MkToOrdNoValW/o cons". Here the account assignment category is "E-Ind. cust. w. KD-CO".
Now I created a sales order, the system determined the requirement type as "KE". I saved the sales order, assigned the stock to the sales order & created a delivery.
I did the PGI also. But when I check in the document flow, for the material document the system has not generated any FI document where we see the accounting document for the "cost of goods sold" & "inventory" G/L accounts. The system gives a message "Material document 4900000023 does not include an accounting document".
Note:
1. When I create the sales order with normal MTS scenario, the system creates an accounting document for the material document at the time of goods issue.
2. The valuation class in the material is 3100 for trading goods.
3. The following settings have been made in OBYC.
for GBB, the G/L accounts have been assigned for general modifier "BSA", "VAX", "VAY" & "VKA".
Please suggest me as to where i am missing any settings.
With best regards,
Niyaz Sayyed.

Dear Niyaz Sayyed
You need to check in the following areas:-
- check whether the material is defined as non-valuated stock
- go to OME9, select your Account Assignment and see whether you have checked the box "GR non-valuated". It should not have been checked
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

How can we assign a different scope of planning in MTO scenario?

Hi,
We are using MTO scenario. In this case, during sales order creation checking control AE is getting triggered. We want to use a different scenario during rescheduling transaction. But as per my analysis, V_V2 is also calling the same AE checking control eventhough we assigned a different checking control for Back order processing.
In this case, can we assign a different checking control (scope of check) for back order processing?
Regards.

Let me explain my requirement here....
This is a kind of trading or sub-contracting. Initially we will give the forecast to vendor...but Vendor will start the finished product production only after getting the confirmed order from us. Hence we thought to use strategy 50. So we will create a PO to Vendor only after getting a confirmed sales order from customer.
But in strategy 50 ATP confirmation is based on PIR. Hence we created a new requirement class (copy of 45 with ATP active). So in this new strategy ATP is against actual receipts instead of PIRs.
But sometimes Vendor may not be able to supply as per lead-time...and he may postpone the delivery date. In this case we are getting exception message 10 for the PO...even though PO is specific to a sales order. Still rescheduling job (V_V2) is not populating the new confirmation date as it is referring to the TRLT.
Hence we want to use ATP based on TRLT during sales order creation. And during rescheduling we want to use a different scope of check ('without TRLT' and with 'No storage location check'). Hence we created a new checking rule for rescheduling and this we assigned for that specific plant.
As per my observation, rescheduling job is not picking the scope of check that is assigned for rescheduling....it is calling the same checking rule AE during rescheduling also.
So my question here is... can we call a different scope of check during rescheduling run while using make to order strategy?
Regards.

Re: Error while making a Process order in MTO scenario

Hi All,
I am having a secnario, where I am using MTO scenario. I want that the sales order should trigger the process order.The components in the BOM for the FG material .
1. Raw material: procured from outside: Stock & value relevent.
2. This one is non valuated one :procured from outside: Stock & Non-value relevent.
Now when I create a sales order, I can see a plan order in the MD04 scree for this FG . But on drilling down this plan order I can only create the PR for the 1st component only ,for the second component I cant create anything.
The second item should be non valuated & stock relevent.
Please help me in this regards,
Vivek

I have taken help from some other threads to resolve this issue.

Free Goods - FI & Inventory valuation Impact

Dear All,
I would like to know what will be the FI & Inventory valuation impacts in the below 2 cases
1. When free goods indicator is flagged for an item in PO.
2. When free goods indicator is not flagged, but GR-IV and Invoice receipt indicator is unchecked.
I understand what free goods are, but what i need to know is, how will the inventory be valued in both the cases & what will be the FI impact.
I hope my question is clear, await inputs.
Regards,
Vivek

Hi,
First of all, if you activate "Free" indicator then "GR based IV" and "Invoice Receipt" indicators get deactivated automatically or when you deactivate "Invoice Receipt" indicator then "Free" indicator gets activated automatically. It's viceversa.
Now It depends upon the Price Control you have maintained in the material master.
Once you activate "Free" item indicator OR deactivate "Invoice Receipt" indicator in PO then at the time of GR if;
Price Control is "V" (MAP)
Goods Receipt happens on zero value and inturn reduces the MAP of the material which affects the material valuation. And No FI Entry will get generated.
For e.g. Current Stock of Material = 100 KG and MAP = 110 INR so Material Value = 11000 INR
After GR of 10 KG on FOC basis, Current Stock of Material = 110 KG, Material Value = 11000 INR so MAP = 100 INR
Price Control "S" (Standard Price)
After GR, there is not any effect on the Standard price of the material or material valuation.
For e.g. Current Stock of Material = 100 KG and SP = 110 INR so Material Value = 11000 INR
After GR of 10 KG on FOC basis, Current Stock of Material = 110 KG, Material Value = 11000 INR and SP = 110 INR
Here At the time of GR following A/c entry get generated;
Price Difference A/c - Dr - 1100 INR
GR/IR Clearing A/c - Cr - 1100 INR

How to Copy Cost Estimate from Quotation to Sales Order in MTO Scenario

Hi,
We are working on a MTO scenario- Sales order Costing with Valuated Stock.
And our case we are creating the Cost Estimate at the time of Quotation using PP qty structure. Now we wan to transfer the cost estimate to Sales Order as we don't want to recost the sales order.
Currenty it's transferring only the EK01 condition as total planned costs in Sales order but we want to see the itemization also.
Please suggest is there any way to transfer this cost estimate with itemization from Quotation to Sales Order.
Regards
venkat

Hi
As far as I know the CO esimate does not get copied from Quotation to Sales Order
You need to recost the SO again.. If your Qty Structure has not changed between Quotation to SO and your valuation variant is also the same - it would give the same result
br, Ajay M

Special MTO Scenario - Costing Issues

Hi,
Not sure if I should post it here or in the FI / CO forum, but here it is ...
I'm in the process of implementing APO in a Aerospace company in Montréal, Canada and we're stuck on an Account Assignment Planning, and Product Costing issue.
Today, all demand / production / movements / costing is done by creating a Project Network.
Here are the current settings:
- Create a project with activities for each major "line section" for major components.
- Each activity has a component allocated to it
- Each activity has a different WBS element assigned to it.
- All production orders/purchase orders/goods movements are created/posted against the WBS elements.
- All stock for MTO parts are assigned to the WBS element
In order to provide better integration with APO and bring more flexibility in the Planning and Simulation processes, we were hoping to stop using Project Networks as the trigger for demand / planning / execution. The idea was to use Sales Orders (or Customer Independent Requirements - CIR) to generate the demand and run APO and MRP planning from it. The special stock segment now becomes linked to the sales order (or CIR) which changes alot of thing in the accounting documents and costs elements in the whole planning and execution processes.
Here is what we were hoping to achieve in order to limit impacts on finance :
- we are implementing APO and would like planning to be performed without using project networks.
- we would like to have planned orders for the top level for long term and be able to trigger the purchasing of long lead time items.
- we would like all goods movements (PO reception, GI to production order etc, ) to be posted to WBS elements
- we would like all production orders to settle to WBS elements
We tried different scenarios with different account assignments categories, but could not find one that fits the bill :
1) we tried using account assignment category "D" which allows assignment to sales order and WBS element. We created CIR as demand.
The problem is the stock is non-valuated which resulted in having no accounting documents for goods issue to production order.
2) we tried account assignment category "Q" with using CIR as demand. We had one WBS element assignment in the CIR. When we changed the WBS value in planned orders to represent each "line section" we ended up with duplicate demand in the original segment and the new segment.
So, is there a scenario with valuated stock that would allow us to do a make-to-order process that would post all costs to WBS?
Thanks,
Marc

Hi, sorry for the title confusion ... I cannot change it anymore.
I'm not sure I understand what you are proposing.
In our case, the problem is not really linked to the CIFing to APO but more on the Account Assignment Category in ECC and the Customer / Project Stock Segment in MRP.
Since we have a multiple level BOM and that the intermediate levels need to be associate with different WBS element according to major parts of the aircraft.
Here is an example :
Aicraft -- Has its own BOM with major parts as sub assemblies,
Major Parts -- Each Major Parts needs to be linked to a different WBS for costing purpose.
Minor Sub Assemblies -- All cost of producing the Minor Sub Assemblies should be tracked inside the Major Parts WBS.
Components -- All components costs and accounting documents should be tracked inside the Major Parts WBS.
We know that by using a project Network for the Aircraft Level we could create activities for each Major Parts with different WBS, but since we want to do planning in APO, we were hoping to not use PS has a scheduling basis. The integration of PS in APO is still not used a lot and the flexibility of Projects in planning processes is not great.
In resume, we are trying to create the demand from a Sales Order or CIR, but manage costs and accounting documents within WBS for all level in order to limit impacts on the Finance Department.

GRPO not shown in Inventory Valuation report

Hi All
When I run Inventory Valuation report one of the GRPO is not shown in the report where other GRPOs are shown.
To the GRPO which is not shown Landed cost is added so in place of the GRPO landed cost document number is displayed with the same quantity and price which originallly entered in GRPO not shown. Is this normal system behaviour? Please reply
thanks
SV Reddy

Hi Sachin,
thanks for the reply,
But the Landed cost document value in the inventory valuation report is same as GRPO document value. When you add landed cost based on GRPO , in the valuation report it should show GRPO value + Landed cost right, but the system doesnt displya this? any other reason it could be?
thanks
SV Reddy

In MTO   scenario i want to have some materials with out account assignment

Hi,
    In MTO scenario i want to have some components in my BOM to not to get planned with respect to sales order stock / account assignment of specifice sales order( say "C" class items). if i use Consumption based planning" VB" for those
materials it works with manual reorder point planning.but i cannot estimate my correct reorder point for that material.because it is not constant requirement .It varies basing on customer sales order for that period.
   My question is how to plan these components in MTO scenario with out having idea of correct manual reorder point for those materials.
thanks in advance
regards
madan

Madan,
Automatic Reorder Point Planning
In automatic reorder point planning, both the reorder level and the safety stock level are determined by the integrated forecasting program.
The system uses past consumption data (historical data) to forecast future requirements. The system then uses these forecast values to calculate the reorder level and the safety stock level, taking the service level, which is specified by the MRP controller, and the material's replenishment lead time into account, and transfers them to the material master.
Since the forecast is carried out at regular intervals, the reorder level and the safety stock level are continually adapted to the current consumption and delivery situation. This means that a contribution is made towards keeping stock levels low.
So you need to maintain the forecast view for the material. The forecast values comes from consumption data. If the system in place for some time then consuption data will be automatically by the system based on the material issues. I am not sure if you can enter the consumption manually.
Regards
Ram

Inventory Valuation Method

HI,
My client has the requirement like comparison of Item with different valuation method in a single report.
Is there any provision to do this.
Please suggest
Regards,
Vikram

Dear Vikram,
Inventory Valuation Method is inteneded as a managerial report to check what-if scenarios. For instance, you can see what happens if you value an item based on a different costing method. This report is not intended to be used as report for auditing. For audititng purposes use the Inventory Audit Report.
You can use any standard method for the inventory valuation. You can also define various criteria to restrict the selection for inventory valuation.
Goto Inventory->Inventory Report->Inventory Valuation Report.
You will have to export to excel and consolidate the results.
Please note It can be run for other costing methods than actually selected for an item. For the selected method of valuation for an item, please run Inventory Audit Report. Exporting will work for you.
Regards
Preety Goel
SAP Business One Forums Team

FIFO Inventory valuation without Balance Sheet Valuation

Our business wants to know if they can have real-time FIFO inventory valuation;
At a give point, When we perform and update the material prices through the Balance sheet Valuation - FIFO procedure; system automatically revaluates the inventory at FIFO with offsetting to an expense account.
However, the requirement is to have FIFO real time without performing any month end tasks/ postings to calculate and update the material prices.
Given that the existing material price controls (S and V); Is the above possible ?
With Material Ledger; some of the standard functionalities can be leveraged i,e to have one valuation for std/ actual and the other to have FIFO valuation but the business thinks this is too much of an effort to maintain this functionality. Since, even for this option - the business has to run month end jobs.
Thanks !

Hi
Real time FIFO valuatopn is some thing which would require ML...
however, there are companies who valuated the inventory based on FIFO at period end w/o any use of ML...
I am not very sure as I have never used it - But using MRN9 you can have a comparison of inventory values as per the 2 principles and if you tick "Update Database", it would post to the books....
Please await further replies from the forum members on this...
br,Ajay M

HU02 in MTO Scenario

Hi ,
i have created SO->
i have run MRP.->
I have confirmed production order.->
i have done GR with MB31(movement type 101)
But, When i am packing that material in HU02 its giving error as
Batch 20027725 1310 2000 11 doesnot exist.
where,
20027725-material
1310-Plant
2000-FG Storage location
11-Batch no.
is it possible to pack material in HU02 for MTO Scenario??? or we have to use COWBPACK & COWBHUWE T-codes???
kindly guide
Regards,
Amol

Madan,
Automatic Reorder Point Planning
In automatic reorder point planning, both the reorder level and the safety stock level are determined by the integrated forecasting program.
The system uses past consumption data (historical data) to forecast future requirements. The system then uses these forecast values to calculate the reorder level and the safety stock level, taking the service level, which is specified by the MRP controller, and the material's replenishment lead time into account, and transfers them to the material master.
Since the forecast is carried out at regular intervals, the reorder level and the safety stock level are continually adapted to the current consumption and delivery situation. This means that a contribution is made towards keeping stock levels low.
So you need to maintain the forecast view for the material. The forecast values comes from consumption data. If the system in place for some time then consuption data will be automatically by the system based on the material issues. I am not sure if you can enter the consumption manually.
Regards
Ram

Sales order costing - MTO Scenario

Hi Experts,
I am working on SAP ECC 6.0 on a Make-to-order scenario.
I have created sales otder; run MRP for the sales order and converted the planned order to Production order and confirmed the production order.
But I don't know the period end processes of make to order scenario. Please answer my following queries:
Whether <b>WIP</b> will be calculated at Sales order level or individual production order level related to this sales order?
Whether <b>variances</b> are to be calculated at each production order level or at sale order level?
Which t-code should be used for calculation of variances if it is calaculated at sales order level? The production orders have TECO status.
Whether variances are to be settled at sales order level or each production order level?
Which Transfer Control should I use in Costong Variant "Sales Order KDN" or "Complete Transfer"?
Please also forward me some documents, if you have, which explains the whole step by step cycle from creation of sales order to settlement of sales order.
My email id is [email protected]
Request your help.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Bijay Kumar Deo

Hi Bijay
To add few more checks and points - please note the following
1) Whether WIP will be calculated at Sales order level or individual production order level related to this sales order?
A) You need to selected RA for sales order in WIP RA version to ensure WIP is calculated for production orders which are linked to sales order
2) Whether variances are to be calculated at each production order level or at sale order level?
A) This would depend on whether u r following valuated or Non Valuated sales order stocks / costing
If is is non valuated u cannot determine variances, actual costs of production order are settled to sales order item
If it is valuated sales order following sales order costing, you can transfer production varainces to sales order item
3) Create settlement profile having sales order as valid receiver and assign profile to production type created for the sales order - MTO scenario
4) Which Transfer Control should I use in Costong Variant "Sales Order KDN" or "Complete Transfer"?
4A) Suggested to have complete transfer as transfer control strategy
Hope the above clarifies. Please assign points if useful as a way to say thanks
Any more suggestions / corrections to above points for the above scenairo are appreciated from forum members

Inventory Valuation : By MTO scenario but produciton based on WBS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for