Invoice amount which is reflecting in our customer ledger

Hi gurus
In few cases Invoice amount which is reflecting in our customer ledger is basic value insted of " net selling value" ( basic price + Tax Price ). Due to which in my customer ledger receivables are showing less as per Invoice value.
Can you solve this problem. and tell me the solution.
Thank you
Anil

Hi
May be the report you are looking is CO-PA report ....if it is the case goto the report form and goto the column of net selling value...and change the formula used over there....if it is a customised (Z report) ...take the ABAPer help....if it is standard report, please let me know the TCODE..so that it will be easy to check the logic
VVR

Similar Messages

In few cases Invoice amount which is reflecting in our customer ledger

Hi
gurus
in few cases Invoice amount which is reflecting in our customer ledger is basic value insted of " net selling value" ( basic price + Tax Price ). Due to which in my customer ledger receivables are showing less as per Invoice value.
what i would like take futher steps to solve this problem.
Thank you for immmedeatly.
Anil

Anil,
You have to look to the pricing in your SD invoice for these situation. I thing there is somthing wrong there.
Paul

Customer ledger receivables are showing less as per Invoice value.

Hi
we have checked randomly and found that in few cases Invoice amount which is reflecting in our customer ledger is basic value insted of " net selling value" ( basic price + Tax Price ). Due to which in my customer ledger receivables are showing less as per Invoice value.
If any body not understand this problem, please send email id. i will send you screen shot.
my email id: [email protected]
Attaching Scrren shot of customer ldeger for customer " Tristar
Attaching mannually working file for your reference

Hi
Is this RP/RW report or standard report ledger ...you are referring , if it is CO-PA report then it will the problem in the forkula. If you double clik on that field you will get the formula ....
VVr

Invoice amount is stored in which column?

Hi
In ra_customer_trx_lines_all Invoice amount is stored in which column?
Thanks
Prakash

Hi Prakash,
Please check links:
http://prasanthapps.blogspot.com/2011/05/ar-query-to-get-open-invoices-for.html
http://ebsanil.blogspot.com/2012/09/query-to-find-ar-invoices-posted-to-gl.html
http://www.shareoracleapps.com/2011/05/query-open-ar-invoices-in-oracle-apps.html
Thanks &
Best Regards,

Query in fetching invoice amount from table EKBE

Hi all,
In my custom report the invoice amount is taken from the field ekbe-dmbtr and is displayed wrongly.
For a particular Purchase order the account assignment table EKKN has only one entry and for the same Purchase order the Purchase order history table EKBE has two entries.
For eg :
Table EKKN
Purchase order       Item               Seq Access number
20900753               000001            01
Table EKBE
Purchase order       Item               Seq Access number   Material Doc Number        Amount(DMBTR)
20900753               000001            01                              5105606685                      500
20900753               000001            99                              5105606685                      500
There is a loop at EKBE within the loop there is a IF condition which checks if
IF EKBE-PO number EQ EKKN-PO number and
EKBE-Item = EKKO-Item and
EKBE-Seq Access Number = EKKN-Seq Access number.
When the above condition is satisfied then the EKBE-DMBTR is added to the o/p field.
ENdloop.
In this case(several account exists for one mat doc,accounting dept use occasionally such cases) since EKKN does not hv seq access number 99 it does not take the second line into consideration so the amount displayed in the output has the value 500 instead of expected value 1000(sum of both the lines 01 and 99)
Can you please offer suggestion on how to solve this issue.I want to know if i can ommit the Seq access number check in the IF condition.In that case i would get the expected result 1000,but will it affect some other functionality.Or is there any other way to solve this.

Hi,
     We cannot say that Seq Access number is unimportant as it depends on the requirements of the client.....
Seq Access is a number defining the account assignment i. e which account should be posted in a transaction ( see documentation of the data element of seq Access ).
We can omit checking of sequential number . Use read table EKKN instead of IF condition as we can check for multiple values of table EKKN.
Thanks,
Viquar Iqbal

Consignment Vendor Invoice Amount Adjustment

Dear All,
Normally in SAP, The vendor invoices for consignment in purchasing is posted from MRKO. There is no invoice posting from MIRO.
In MRKO, after entering the selection details, we choose SETTLE for processing type, then we run it and vendor invoice is posted.
So I wonder how can our client make some adjustments for very small differences in the price ? Because normally there may be some differences like 0,50 EUR because of the roundings. So how will these difference amounts will be posted ?
Thx in advance

Hi,
MR11 shows the amount for GI/IR account if there is any.. But in consignment case.. you put the price to inforecord, then withdrawals occur. According to these withdrawals you settle the vendor invoice. But the price is already captured from the inforecord. When you settle it, SAP assumes the price as the inforecord price. That is ok. But because of the roundings (because it is only two digit after comma) the real vendor invoice may be different like 0,50 eur (for example you posted 300 EUR, but real invoice is 300,50 EUR)
This happens very frequently for our customer. So MR11 is useless for that case. There shall be some other trx to make these differences to be posted. So how will the 0,50 EUR posted ? This 0,50 eur will not appear in MR11

Invoice Amount

Hi Gurus,
Our Supplier's cost for a certain product is at $0.695. However, since SAP only recognize 2 digits we rounded it off to $0.70 when we created the PO.
We then created an invoice for the payment of this PO using the correct cost of $0.695.
Kindly advise what will be the effect in FI since the PO Amount is greater than the invoice amount. Where will the variance in amount be posted?
Thanks,
Ellicec

Hi:
If you mean to say that GRN was done at 0.70 and invoicing was raised for actual cost 0.695 then system will post this difference to price difference account as maintained in OBYC..PRD for the respective valuation class of material. Hence variance is only updated in FI not in CO.. If you want to make this variance part of cost in controlling then use of actual costing would be required which in turns requires activation of material ledger. I hope this will help you.
Regards

Date wise invoice amount

Dear all,
I am in need of a report which will tell me what is the vendor invoice value posted for any particular date.
I checked in MC$4 report where the invoice amount is shown cumulated for a particular month. - can i have a date wise details for any plant and vendor.
Regards,
M.M

Hello,
BKPF - Accounting document header - where you will have accounting document number / document type / document date / posting date / reference etc.
BSEG - Data relating to all line items of accounting document.
EKPO - Purchasing document item
EKKO - Purchasing document header.
Hope these tables are helpful.
Also hope the following document is helpful for you.
http://www.abap.es/Descargas/TAB%20-%20Relacion%20de%20las%20tablas%20por%20modulos.PDF
www.b-cis.fr/ressources/tables-in-sap.doc
Regards,
Ravi

Difference between Invoice amount and invoice amount on psting date

Hi Gurus,
I had run MC$G report which dispalys Vendor/Order Qty/PO value/Gr quantity/GR value/Invoice quantity/Invoice amount (Posting date) / Invoice amount
In this issue is Invoice amount Posting date and Invoice amount fields were not showing same value.
Could you please tell me the difference between these 2 ??
Reagr

No answer

Payment Amount is greater than invoice amount in sales order

Hi experts:
I have a Sales order that contained originally 3 lines of which the first 2 lines was delivered totally and the third was delivered partially.
The client decided to change the remaining quantity for another reference so the procedure in the sales order was to add another line and try to close the third line by right click and "close row" but the option is not available because there is a partial delivery, so the option was to update the inicial quantity in the third line at the same as delivered and update.
Like a result a I could close the third line and leave a fourth line available to delivery, however when I open this Sales order again an try to update a message "payment amount is greater than invoice amount" and appears inmediately the "Deposit on Order" window.
Other Information: The quantities delivered was invoiced but no payment has been received.
Checking in the SCN I have not found some related information with this case because the existing answers are related with incomming and outgoing payments but like I mentioned before this docuements already have not payments.
In relation with the decimal places, my original decimal places configuration was 2 and it was updated to 3, issue that neither is mentioned in previous answers.
I will appreciate your help,
Thanks,
Manuel

Hi Manuel,
Your case is complicated by the fact you have not only undated the Sales Order which is partially delivered but also updated decimal places during the process. In this case, you are probably the best person to figure out what is the system expected number. You may restore your production db to test environment first. Then do whatever you could to fix the problem. If no solution can be found, you have to log a message to SAP support.
A general advice: do not fight with system for what you think system should accept.
Thanks,
Gordon

Duplicate Invoice Check Not Checking the Gross Invoice Amount-

Gurus,
When checking for duplicate invoices in MIRO/FB60, I have made all the config and setup but still the system is not checking the gross Invoice amount field. Lets say I enter
Invoice 1 :
                 Vendor                 X
                  Reference            123
                  Date                    10/27/2010
                  Company Code : 1111
                  Currency           : USD
                  AMOUNT           :100         and post this invoice
I try to enter the second invoice
Invoice 2:
                   Vendor                 X
                  Reference            123
                  Date                    10/27/2010
                  Company Code : 1111
                  Currency           : USD
                  AMOUNT           : 90
I get the error message even though the AMOUNT in the second invoice is 90 which is not the same as first invoice .
I chcked the vendor master duplicate check, made the config in spro-liv for duplicate invoice for company code, reference number and invoice date.
The help says that after 4.6 version if all of them match, then the system wiill throw error, but in my case the amount is not matching and its still giving me an error.
Kindly help..<< Moderator message - Please do not offer points >>
<< Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important >>
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Oct 27, 2010 4:07 PM

Hi,
After making the duplcate invoices chek at spro will checks the reference number of the invoice entered previouslu with that one entered later for that company code.as the first check itself failed system throws the error thinking, you are trying to enter a duplicate invoice for a already posted invoice though how much is the amount in the second invoice .
It will allow to enter the item details , if the dupplicate invoice check is properly configured for that company code and ref number .Did you get the error mesage after entering the details?If you get a error a message which stops furthur entry them your conf is correct, if not you may need to check back .
Check the invoice toletrances at spro too amount.
the below link explains you the process of dupliation in LIV.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/ce/4f3e39ea3aee02e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Regards,

Need to display invoice amounts under each aging period (columns dynamic)

Hi All
i'm developing Aging Report but i'm missing how to get the idea that i show the aging period(period_sequence_number)dynamically & show the invoice amount under its corresponding period
As for example
Vendor No Vendor Name Invoice No Date Voucher Ref Due Date 0-30 30-60 Column(n)
aaaa ccccc dddd 3333 15/5/2010 1000
aaaa ccccc dddd 3333 15/5/2010 2000
where
1- (1000,2000) is the invoice amount .
2- ( 0-30 , column(n)) days start & days to of tht period selected as parameter
waiting your reply

Hi;
Please see below notes which could be helpful for your issue:
New Parameter As Of Date (Period) In Invoice Aging Report [ID 752120.1]
R12.APXINAGE. Invoice Aging Report does not Show Balances in Aging Buckets. [ID 834754.1]
New Parameter As Of Date (Period) In Invoice Aging Report [ID 752120.1]
Regard
Helios

When reporting "Spend" do you use PO Value, Invoice Amount or Goods Receipt

When reporting "Spend" do you use PO Value, Invoice Amount or Goods Receipt? I am trying to standardize reporting and would like feedback on what is the norm. The users cannot agree so I need to know what the standard is.

PO Value is what is budgeted for ,
Invoice is what is actually being paid for.
GR would give you the value of goods received. My take on this is that it should be Invoice value since this is what is reflected in the books and is actually being paid for...

The amount of down payment must be less than the invoice amount

Hi all,
Our customers are using SAP 2007-PL15 and SAP 2007-PL41.
When we want to create a down payment for a sales order, and we want to pay the entire amount of the sales order, including tax, we have to put an amount inthe TOTAL field of the Down Payment window since by default, the down payment amount is the total of the invoice before applying tax. The DPM is
higher than 100% (strange but I think it's normal since the down payment is not planned to take the tax in consideration).
Then, we create an incoming payment for this down payment. It's ok.
Then, we create an invoice based on the sales order we have paid with the down payment. It's impossible to use the down payment for the invoice... why that ? We receive the error 'The amount of down payment must be less than the invoice amount'. This causes big headaches to our customers !!
Could you explain us what to do please ?
thanks,
Luce

I'm very sorry, I have a similar question in dealing with AP Down Payment Request Linked to AP Invoice, my case like this:
1. I created 3 AP DPRs,their amount are each 100,000 RMB(for example, their document number are 10,11,12). then do the outgoing payment fully paided.
2. I created a AP Invoice with the amount 150,000 RMB(for example, this AR Invoice document number is 5). I use the buttom"Total Down Payment",and selecet AP DRP No.10 and 11. When I click the buttom"Add",an error shows:
The amount of down payment must be less than the invoice amount
and I don't know how to continue.....
Many Thanks
Kam
(PS:My English is poor,forgive me please. Shall I Speak in Chinese? then I can describe this question more clearly.)

Invoice amount not change according to qty

Dear Experts,
Po qty 10 unit & price is RM1/unit.
GR has been done for full qty.
Now I'm going to to perform IV via MIRO. Let say I receive invoice for 4 qty. So when I enter PO no in MIRO, system pull all the information from GR that done against this PO. Now I wanated to change qty as 4 but the header amount still shows as RM10. It doesnt change according to invoice qty. And also the accounting entry reflect based on RM10 not based on invoice amount (RM4). Appreciate if you could brief me on this. How may I set this in SAP.
rgds,
nantha

hi,
the grey filed u can make its editable mode by T code - SHD0.... here u give
T code - Miro
Trans variant - ZMiro and then click create button. .it will take u to the Miro transaction , where u enter ur po number and excute.. here u can see ur amt field will be checked , just unchedked and save this variant .as well acitvate the variant.. later u can check the miro with amt option in ediable mode

Invoice amount which is reflecting in our customer ledger

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for