Invoice Descriptions are not carried to GL

Hi
In our R11 the Invoice Description in AP are carried to GL when we run the Payables Transfer to GL.
But in R12, im wondering why is it the Invoice Description that we had in Payables Module are no longer copied to GL Journal Description Column. Instead it showed "Journal Import Created".
How can I make the GL copy the Invoice Description in AP when I run Transfer Journal Entries to GL?
thanks
emgee

Hello emgee,
Please check your Accounting Setup.
Please follow this Navigation:
*(N) General Ledger > Financials > Accounting Setup Manager > Accounting Setups*
- Query for the Leger being used
- Choose Update Accounting Options
- Update Subledger Accounting Options
- Under Applications: Payable, choose Update Accounting Options
- On the General Ledger Journal Entry Summarization field, choose No Summarization

Similar Messages

How do i check the list of invoices which are not posted into sap.

Hi All,
Iam displaying(ALV) the list of invoices and epayments for both PO & non PO transactons which are being processed in workflow but not posted in sap.
(Non po transaction is th eone with out reference of a PO)
How to check and list out the invoices that are not posted in sap. where does this get stored.
please help.
Thanks
jyothi.

Hello Jyothi,
U can give try with EKBE table for getting invoices for PO. In this table there is a field vgabe which has various status. U can try that. Now for Non PO, u would be directly creating invoice doucment using FB60(i guess) which would create an entry directly into BKPF/BSEG. U can scan BKPF for the date range company code document type KR which vendor invoice.

Entity Descriptions are not displayed correctly in Combo box dropdown list

In Web Analysis, Entity Descriptions are not displayed correctly in Combo box dropdown list when entity descriptions from HFM contains a dot(.)
Example:
'Entity A. LTD' becomes 'LTD'
'Entity B Inc.' becomes blank
It seems that everything before the dot is not displayed when opening the combobox.
It looks like it is acting like the option to show short description for entities in HR where the parent-child relation is not shown. This behaviour I don't expect for descriptions. And in my opinion is not an option in Web Analysis.
Does anybody knows the sollution or have seen this issue before?

Hi,
This is a known issue with combo box list of values.
Please follow this workaround:
- Remove ComboboxLOV on Deptno
- Create an updateable transient attribute(Say Dname) of type String
- Define combobox lov with following values:
List Data Source: DeptView1
List Attribute: Dname
List Return Values:
Dname - Dname
Deptno - Deptno
UI Hints: Display Attribute - Dname
- Edit Dname(transient attribute) and provide following groovy expression
oracle.jbo.Key key = new oracle.jbo.Key(Deptno);
return DeptView1.findByKey(key, 1)[0].getAttribute("Dname");- Now, you are done and observe that Dname combo box lov shows Description even on selection and change in this combo box sets the Deptno value
Sireesha

Leading zeros are not carried from the pivot table to exported Excel (9927815)

Hello All -
I am just wondering if there is a fix available for -- Leading zeros are not carried from the pivot table to exported Excel (9927815)
can anybody suggest when it will be fixed and if there is any-workaround for this issue if there is no fix available.
Thanks
Ram

Thanks Timo -
Studio Edition Version 11.1.1.2.0
About
Oracle JDeveloper 11g Release 1 11.1.1.2.0
Studio Edition Version 11.1.1.2.0
Build JDEVADF_11.1.1.2.0_GENERIC_091029.2229.5536
Copyright © 1997, 2009 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
IDE Version: 11.1.1.2.36.55.36
Product ID: oracle.jdeveloper
Product Version: 11.1.1.2.36.55.36
I will check on support.oracle.com

Invoice outputs are not printing after saving the document..!

Invoice outputs are not printing after saving the document. Eventhough we maintain all condition records not only that Processing log also it showed that it has been processed on some date. but customer not received the printout
Amar

hI,
GO TO IMG, SD, BF, OUTPUT CONTROL, OUTPUT TYPES, SELECT UR OUTPUT TYPE, GO TO DETAILS ICON AND ASSIGN THE VALUE "ISSUE OUTPUT IMMEDIATELY SAVING THE APPLICATION" FROM DROP DOWN DOWN LIST IN THE DEFAULT VALUES
AND ASSIGN THE RELEVENT PRINTER TO USER ID IN SU01 AND IN CONDITION RECORDS
REGARDS,
SK
Edited by: Sadanandam Kasarla on Mar 16, 2009 12:07 PM
Edited by: Sadanandam Kasarla on Mar 16, 2009 12:08 PM
Edited by: Sadanandam Kasarla on Mar 16, 2009 12:10 PM

Workflow notifications of AP Invoice approval are not transferring.

Workflow notifications of AP Invoice approval are not transferring in ERP 11i. The voucher remains in the INITIATED status for long and approval notification is
not reaching the approvers login for approval.
Regards

Hi,
Using the Sysadmin responsibility, please submit "Workflow Background Process" with the below parameters and see if it helps:
Process Deferred: Y
Process Timeout: Y
Please also see the following notes;
How to Manually Process the Events from Workflow Queues When The Deferred Agent Listener Won't Start [ID 953103.1]
Workflow Background Process Does Not Progress Shipped Lines: Stuck in Fulfill - Deferred [ID 804133.1]
Hope this helps!
Best Regards

Indicators "goods receipt" "invoice expected" are not set! Bug or feature?

Hi all,
we are using SRM 5.0 classic scenario.
A freetext shopping cart without vendor assignment creates a PR in the backend (4.6C). In this PR the indicators for "goods receipt" and invoice expected" are not set. Is this ab bug or a feature.
In former realeases these indicators are set automatically for the document flow.
What do I have to do to set the indicators automatically in SRM 5.0.
Best regards
Susanne

Hello,
in classic scenario those flags are set according to the account assignment type and the settings in backend transaction OME9. On the one hand these settings can be overruled by BADI(s), on the other hand this behavior has also been noticed due to a malfunction which was corrected with note 1175255
(pls also take into account the corrections for the backend!).
I hope this is a first approach for solving the issue.
BR
Michael Haslinger

Credit note with invoice reference are not concatenate in F110

When I create a credit note with invoice reference by VA01, the fields payment term, Baseline date for due date calculation, Assignment and Payment method are copied correctly from invoice to credit note, but in FI document the field invoice ref. 'BSEG-REBZG' is not filled. So when I run the transaction F110 Automathic Payment (for Italy) the invoice is rigthly payed but the credit not is included into Exceptions with the note 'No pymt possible because items with a credit bal.still exist'. If I put in the field 'BSEG-REBZG' the reference to the invoice, the one and credit note are concatenated and I have a rigth parzial payment.
There is a way to have this link when I post the Fi document by vf01-vf02 without putting it manually using FB03?
Thank you in advance
Gianluca.

hiii
please refer thi link reconciliation in 2005
https://websmp208.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_FRAME=CONTAINER&_OBJECT=011000358700000789632007E
i would suggest you to upgrade your version, as reconciliation is very easy in higher versions
please refer sap note no 1051038.
Thanks
Rizz
Edited by: Mohammed Riyaz on Apr 24, 2009 4:01 PM

Invoice details are not updating in XKOMFK table in vf02

Hello Experts,
I am facing an issue in vf02, invoice details in table XKOMFK are not getting updated becuase of which my user exit is not fuctioning correctly.
Please advice how the table XKOMFK will be updated in vf02.
Thank You,
Nusrat Jahan

Hi,
Check this . You need to write code for "i_callback_user_command"
* Form f_user_command1                                                *
* This form will handle the user command from fm REUSE                 *
form f_user_command1 using p_ucomm type sy-ucomm
                     rs_selfield type slis_selfield.
data p_ref1 type ref to cl_gui_alv_grid.
call function 'GET_GLOBALS_FROM_SLVC_FULLSCR'
    importing
      e_grid = p_ref1.
call method p_ref1->check_changed_data.
case p_ucomm.
    when '&DATA_SAVE'.
       " Write your code for save
endcase.
rs_selfield-refresh = c_x.             " Grid refresh
endform.                                 " F_user_command1
a®

Hana view column descriptions are not showing in Crystal 2013

Hello All,
I have a hana calculation view which has the column name and label defined perfectly. When I use the HANA view in Crystal Report 2013, the column labels are not showing up in the field explorer even after enabling the show both name and description. Please help.

hi
is anyone has answer for this question.
thanks...!!!!

BPC 7.5: Node ID and description are not loading

Hi,
I'm working on BPC 7.5 and SP04.
I'm working on BPC 7.5 and SP04.
I have G/L account hierarchy in BI system. I tried to load G/L account master data attr/text into BPC and successfully loaded but hierarchy node ID's and description are missed. I followed the below steps.
1) Loaded master attr,text and hierarchy data from ECC to BI and activated the master data.
2) Used the below transformation and conversion file.
3) Selected the hierarchy in selecetion in data package while loading data into BPC.
Transformation File:
*OPTIONS
FORMAT = DELIMITED
HEADER = YES
DELIMITER = TAB
AMOUNTDECIMALPOINT = .
SKIP = 0
SKIPIF = 177000
VALIDATERECORDS=YES
CREDITPOSITIVE=YES
MAXREJECTCOUNT=
ROUNDAMOUNT=*MAPPING
*MAPPING
ID=ID
*CONVERSION
ID=ACCT_ID_MD.xls
G/L Account compounded to chart of accounts (10+4) and has total length 14 and hierarchy node ID's have length 32.
I used the below conversion file.
External                                                         Internal
01000000??????                               ??????
0100000???????                               ???????
010000????????                               ????????
0000000000000000000000000000????         ????
000000000000000000000000000?????         ?????
00000000000000000000000000??????         ??????
0000000000000000000000000???????         ???????
*                                                      js:%external%;
Please suggest anyone how can I load node ID's and description.
Note: I followed the same above process for 0PROFIT_CTR and 0COSTCETER and successfully loaded master, text and hierarchy data.
Thanks
Prasad

Hi,
Use the below code in CMOD and change the hierarchy name.
*& Include           ZXRSAU04
CASE i_datasource.
Global Declaration *********
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <FOLDERT> TYPE ROSFOLDERT,
               <HIENODE> TYPE ROSHIENODE.
CONSTANTS : C_NODE VALUE 'C'.
**Enhancement will be used to suffix Z to all cost center hierarchy node
**This will be further used in BPC to load hierarchy without error.
WHEN '0COSTCENTER_0101_HIER'.
LOOP At C_T_HIENODE3 ASSIGNING <HIENODE>.
   IF <HIENODE>-IOBJNM = '0HIER_NODE'.
   CONCATENATE 'Z' <HIENODE>-NODENAME+4(20) into <HIENODE>-NODENAME.
   ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP At C_T_FOLDERT ASSIGNING <FOLDERT>.
IF <FOLDERT>-IOBJNM = '0HIER_NODE'.
CONCATENATE 'Z' <FOLDERT>-NODENAME+4(20) into <FOLDERT>-NODENAME.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP At C_T_HIENODE ASSIGNING <HIENODE>.
IF <HIENODE>-IOBJNM = '0HIER_NODE'.
CONCATENATE 'Z' <HIENODE>-NODENAME+4(20) into <HIENODE>-NODENAME.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
********End Of Code
**Enhancement will be used to suffix Z to all profit center hierarchy node
**This will be further used in BPC to load hierarchy without error.
WHEN '0PROFIT_CTR_0106_HIER'.
LOOP At C_T_HIENODE3 ASSIGNING <HIENODE>.
   IF <HIENODE>-IOBJNM = '0HIER_NODE'.
   CONCATENATE 'Z' <HIENODE>-NODENAME+4(20) into <HIENODE>-NODENAME.
   ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP At C_T_FOLDERT ASSIGNING <FOLDERT>.
IF <FOLDERT>-IOBJNM = '0HIER_NODE'.
CONCATENATE 'Z' <FOLDERT>-NODENAME+4(20) into <FOLDERT>-NODENAME.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP At C_T_HIENODE ASSIGNING <HIENODE>.
IF <HIENODE>-IOBJNM = '0HIER_NODE'.
CONCATENATE 'Z' <HIENODE>-NODENAME+4(20) into <HIENODE>-NODENAME.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
********End Of Code
ENDCASE.
Thanks
Prasad

Invoicing Party relationship not carried through to PO in ECC

SRM 5 extended classic SPK12
Hello Gurus
We have our vendors synchronised with our R3 backend including the Invoicing parties. This all appears to work ok and can see them individually if we use BP. However, when we attempt to raise a PO against the actual order VN vendor #, when we check in ECC using ME23N, we do not see the invoicing party mentioned in the Partners tab, which causes problems when paying.
Have I forgotten something or am wrongfully assuming that the partnering function that is visible in ECC, does not carry through to SRM?
I've tried to go through all notes but don't see anything in there, which leads me to believe it's really obvious.
Thanks in advance.
Ian

Can anybody help?

Lightroom 4 settings are not carried over to Photoshop CS5

When opening a raw and unedited file using the 'Edit in Photoshop' menu selection in Lightroom 4 the image opens as expected in Photoshop CS5. The images seem to look identical to me. If I then exit from PS without doing anything to the photo I am prompted to save the file. I do so and return to LR4. Comparing the original raw file and the tif created by PS they appear to be identical.
Next, I make some whitebalance, exposure, and cropping changes to the raw image in LR4. 'Edit in Photoshop' opens the image in PS CS5 but the image appears different. Cropping is there but other adjustements seem to me to be lost. Again clost the image without any editing in PS CS5 and am prompted to save the file. I do so and the saved tif appears in LR4 just as it looked in PS CS5. However they are different.
I'm using a Windows 7 64 bit computer.

dls1956 wrote:
When opening a raw and unedited file using the 'Edit in Photoshop' menu selection in Lightroom 4 the image opens as expected in Photoshop CS5. The images seem to look identical to me. If I then exit from PS without doing anything to the photo I am prompted to save the file. I do so and return to LR4. Comparing the original raw file and the tif created by PS they appear to be identical.http://4scotts.smugmug.com/photos/i-VpkGKTd/0/L/i-VpkGKTd-L.png
Next, I make some whitebalance, exposure, and cropping changes to the raw image in LR4. 'Edit in Photoshop' opens the image in PS CS5 but the image appears different. Cropping is there but other adjustements seem to me to be lost.
The most significant point is that the first time you go to Photoshop with an image, you start with one image inside LR and you end up with two - the original image, and a brand new edited version. Generally this is "Edit a copy with Lightroom adjustments"; in other words, something that looks the same as the LR starting image currently does, as a starting point for PS alteration.
Subsequent times you take this edited version of the image back to Photoshop, the Edit In.. feature automatically switches to "Edit Original" as default behaviour. This is so that you don't get a whole family of fresh image versions appearing in LR, and a whole cluster of TIFF files on disk. Just the same image progressively changing over time, as PS work is done.
A PS-edited version seen newly in LR, starts out with zero applied LR adjustments - so it appears at first, exactly as PS has just saved it.
Say (to help clarify this ) you make a virtual copy at this point - and apply some more LR adjustments onto that. You can now see three versions: [1] the starting original which did not go to PS; [2] an untouched version of the PS edit, which has so far been left alone by LR; and [3] another version of the same PS edit, this time with some new LR adjustments overlaid.
If you push the image back to PS for some more editing, save that, and return to LR then both versions [2] and [3] are going to update so as to reflect this later editing. That is because both are deriving their underlying content in a live manner from the same file on disk, which has since changed.
While you are editing any file within PS you are always viewing the actual content of that file. This will naturally look the same as the untouched LR version [2] does. But it will not look the same as the adjusted LR version [3] does - because the live LR settings which cause [3] to look different to [2], are not included in the PS file which they share. They are separate from that - they are being nondestructively applied and displayed on-the-fly by Lightroom only, and in this example, only in the case of one of the two derived versions.
RP

Invoice Days are not calculating when a Days limit exists.

Hello,
We are having an issue with both our Customer and Vendor invoices.
When using a 'payment term' with a 'Days limit' the Due date is not calculating at all. The 'Days' field in the 'Payment tab' just comes up as a blank.
This functionality used to work, something must have changed in the system.
This is how I have the Payment term setup.
ZY87 (days limit 10). 120 days invoice date (10th & 25th)
Default for Baseline Date = Document Date
Fixed Date = 10, Additional months = 4
ZY87 (days limit 25) 120 days invoice date (10th & 25th)
Default for Baseline date = Document Date
Fixed Date = 25, Additional months = 4.
When I choose this payment term in the invoice, I get no value to show up in the 'Days' box and when I save it, the Due date becomes the Baseline Date.
Any idea why?
thanks for your help!
Brett

Thanks for your immediate response.
i have maintained all the ticks for the counting rule for LOP absence type. but in the infotype it still shows 22 days instead of 31 days for the month of oct.
Regards,
MVN

Descriptions are not being exported even though option is ticked

This is a new problem for me. Not sure when it cropped up, but possibly in the last iPhoto update?
When I export a photo from my library and tick the 'Titles and Keywords' box, the description field is not copied into the IPTC caption field as it used to be. The title and keywords are, but when I look at the info panel in Finder (or in Preview), the description field remains set to "SONY DSC" which is the camera's default.
I'm running iPhoto 9.4.1 on OSX10.8.2
Is this a bug? Is anyone else having this problem? Any insights appreciated.

I fixed all my exported photos with missing IPTC data using this command:
exiftool -iptc:all= -tagsfromfile @ -all:all -unsafe ./
Download the exiftool here: http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/
open a terminal window, cd into the directory with all the exported photos, then run the exiftool command.
voila! the descriptions re-appear.
if iPhoto can create new descriptions, regardless of what camera they were taken on, then iPhoto should also be able to export them. And, this is why i'll never use iPhoto again.

Invoice Descriptions are not carried to GL

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for