Invoice issue for Multiple Account assigned PO

Hello
We are facing an issue with a Serive PO which has account assigned to cost centre (K).8 costcentres are assigned .
While booking invoice on one particular date the invoice amount got distributed among all the 8 cost centres but on some other day when invoice was booked it was allocated to only the first costcentre.
can somebody help me with the logic how the invoice gets distributed and what could be the reason the invoice amount is not distributed among all the costcentres and only one.
Regards
Sarika

Hi Sarika,
please have a look at the following notes:
568541     MIRO: Default values with multiple account assignme
457740     MIRO/MR1M: Default values, amts for multiple accou
395043     FAQ: Posting invoices using Transaction MIRO
428157 MIRO: percentage multiple accnt assgnt f. service-based IV
Please also check the customize settings to in Tr:OME9, under 'partial
invoice' what is the settings to the cost center.
Also note in MIRO, system distribute the corresponding GR quantity into
acc.assignment's items proportionately based on the indicator 'Partial
invoice' and the data 'Distribution percentage'(VPROZ) in the screening
'acc.assignment' within the PO/item.
You can change the "Partial invoice' in the screening 'acc.assignment"
as '1' (Apportion IR quantities to GR quantities one after another)
instead of using 2 "Apportion IR quantities to GR quantities
proportionately".
Please check also include LMRMKF02.
Regards,
Edit
Regards,
Edit

Similar Messages

Partial invoice indicator for multiple account assignment case

In ECC, the partial invoice indicator field (TWRKZ) has to be set when there are multiple account assignments for an item. But this field is not available in SRM account assignment section. So in SRM, when a PO is created with multiple account assignments for an item and transferred to ECC, error ("06"/"437") would be displayed -
Distr. ind. and partial invoice ind. must be set for multi acct. assgt
Has anyone of you encountered such issue? Of course we can add this field in SRM PO Accounting as a custom field and map it later when transferring the PO to ECC, but it seems to be an obvious gap between SRM PO and ECC PO, wouldn't you think?
Thanks.

Hi! Thanks in advance!
Did you find the solution for this issue!!
Best Regards,
Gax

PO issue (for multiple account assignment)

Hi,
I am greatly in need of help from you all.
The problem is as demonstrated under.
A PO is created using the Account assignment category A (Asset procurement). The material to be procured has the Quantity 4Nos.
In the account assignments 2 qty are assigned to one asset and another 2 qty is assigned to diffrent asset. GL account in both the cases remain the same.
After this PO is saved.
GR is done using movement type 101.
now GR is cancelled using movement type 102.
Now in display PO Header- Status tab. here it is showing the quantity to be delivered is 4 but value is shown as 0.00.
I<b> donot understand why the value doesnt get fetched in Status tab of PO header.</b>If I dont use the multiple account assignemnt for the above condition then the values are shown in the Status tab of PO header.
Thanks in advance,
<b>Sheetal</b>

Hi,
Yogesh is right (as usual).
When you create the PO and assign multiple accounts to it you will be prompted to change the GR flag to either indicate NO GR or a Non valuated GR (you CANNOT HAVE a valuated GR for a PO with mulitple account assignements on the one line).
The system does not post any values for this until the Invoice has been posted correctly (or posted and blocked).
So the GR (and return if applicable) always have zero value.
Steve B

GR and GR Non Val indicator in R/3 PO for multiple account assigned SC's

Hi,
We are on SRM 3.0(EBP 4.0) and R/3 4.7.
We have implemented the BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK badi for setting or clearing the GR and IR indicators under certian conditions.
But for Multiple account assigned SC's we get an error message "06181 With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR i ndicator ".
We have tried implementing note# 872000, but this has not solved the issue.
The PO's get created only if we force the GR indicator when transferring the data into R/3.
It seems clear that while creating the PO the system is encountering the GR Non Val indicator but not the GR indicator, so its throwing the error message (we get the same error message when we create the PO from R/3 with GRnon val indicator checked and GR ind unchecked).
The proposed solution is that in the same BADI, along with clearing the GR indicator, we will also clear the GR non val indicator.
This can solve the issue if the indicators are transferred as it is from EBP.
But can anyone tell me if these indicators are also checked/changed in any FM/program in R/3 before the PO is created?
Is there any customizing setting which is affecting this particular behaviour?
Regards,
Srivatsan

Hi Srivatsan ?
In ECC, you have a configuration point :
Materials Management->Account Assignment->Maintain Account Assignment Categories
Here you can untick the indicator you want by account assignment category;
Kind regards,
Yann

GR/IR Rounding Logic for Multiple Account Assignment

We have activated business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 (EHP4 release 604), GR valuated. When choosing Distribution on quantity basis and distribute partial inv proportionally, the MIGO postings are different from the MIRO postings. For example, we have a quantity of 12 that we allocate to two different cost centers 33.3 / 66.7 %. We receive a partial qty of 5. MIGO distributes the quantity 1.665 / 3.335, respectively. However, MIRO distributes the quantity 1.666 / 3.333 respectively. Since MIRO is supposed to accept the MIGO quantities and amounts, why is the percentage allocation different? Is there a way to make the percentages equal for MIGO / MIRO? Modification of the percentage field (VPROZ) in the PO to more than 1 decimal is not an option.
Example
    PO (quantity-based distribution, partial inv is proportional: Receive partial Qty 5 of total 12
                         Net Value            Qty              Percen           MIGO           MIRO
    Item:            9,600.00 USD    12.000 pc     100.00       4,340.00      4,340.00
    Account 1: 3,200.00 USD      4.000 pc        33.3         1,446.67      1,446.96
    Account 2: 6,400.00 USD      8.000 pc        66.7         2,893.33      2,893.04
The small difference of $0.29 for this example is inconsequential, but for larger quantieis it will have a greater impact on the account allocation.

U set or U dont set system will flag the GR non valuated once u assign multiple account assignment.
But SAP is coming up with GR valuated for Multiple account assignment in enhancement package 4.
Check out EP4 Presentation at........
https://websmp210.sap-ag.de/erp-ehp
Venkat

Customizing for multiple account assignment in OME9

Hello,
We want to create a specific account category with different account assignment fields (cost center, WBS, order, etc).
This account category will be used for PO items with single account assignment or multiple account assignment.
One more information is this specific account category will be used only for PO replicated from Supplier Relationship Management. This means PO document type will not be created directly in R/3.
We use ECC6 with EhP4 with business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 active, so we make MAA for GR valuated.
According to those elements, iI would like to have confirmation regarding customizing we implemented, especially for fields:
- "Indicator: Account assignment screen" populated with value '2' (Multiple account assignment)
- "Distribution" empty (Single account assignment),
- "Partial Invoice" populated with value '2' (Apportion IR quantities to GR quantities proportionately).
While creating PO in SRM and after replication in R/3, cost distribution is done correctly for item with multiple account assignment (Account Assignment tab with Partial Inv. = "Distribute Proportionately" and Distribution = 1, 2 or 3, depending on cost distribution type chosen) whereas for item with single account assignment, Partial Inv. is "Derive from Account Assignment Category" and Distribution is "Single Account Assignment Category").
So, it seems OK. Nevertheless, i would like to have confirmation values i gave with above fields are correct in order to not have to change them later, i mean after PO were created, if problems occured.
Thank you for your help.
Regards.
Laurent.

Hello,
During PO replication from SRM to R/3, customizing from OME9 is not read and "Partial invoice indicator" is always defaulted to "1" when item has a multiple account assignment.
This behaviour can be overwritten by implementing:
- either BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI for method BBP_MAP_BEFORE_BAPI,
- or BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI for method BBP_B46B_PO_OUTBOUND.
So, no need to take care of OME9 customizing.
Regards.
Laurent.

ERROR WHILE POSTING MIRO FOR MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT (ASSET)

Hi Guys,
We created a PO for asset with multiple account assignment. And we immediately do IR instead of GR.
While doing IR it is giving error
1) Quantity delivered is zero - Warning message
2) Account 245350 requires a Transaction Type or is Invalid - Error message
what may be the problem. how can we eliminate and post it
Regards
palani

Hi,
I would assume the G/L account you used was not properly set up. Did you get the same problem if you try to change to another G/L account? Perhaps, get your FI specialist to look into this G/L account-related error and verify it.
Cheers,
HT

Fi Document is not generating in MIGO for multiple account assignment in PO

Hi,
I have have created asset po DG set 111 quanity is 4, i have created 4 different assets and assign quanity 1 to each dg sets in account assignment. While doing GRN system is not generating FI document for this po. if i am giving one quanity or single account assignment for as 4 then it is generating FI quantity.
PLease help me out why system is not generating FI document for multiple accont assignment in MIGO.
Thanks in advance
KISHORE

Hi
There is no option if you are not on EhP4... Do MIRO and see if the FI doc is generated
Only way is to do MIRO immediately after MIGO.. OR Schedule ERS (Evaluated Receipt Settlement) which runs every hour in the background so that MIRO is posted automatically based on MIGO document.... Basically, you have to do MIRO after MIGO.. Whether you do it manually or through ERS is a matter of choice
Regards
Ajay M

Hard Question:   Item-Based Approval for Multiple Account Assignment?

Hi Vadim and community,
Possibly.. this is my hardest question for you.
We need to implement Item-Based Workflow Approval. The CC Owner should approve only the items assigned to his/her CC.    We'll do this reading R3(CO) data.
Thats not the problem.
The problem is: I need to use Multiple Account Assignment. I'll distribute one time in 3 o more CC.   Is it possible to have an CC-Based Workflow Approval ?   I mean, The CC owner should approve partly the item assigned to his/her CC.
Anybody knows something ?
Thanks for your reply !!! =)
Regards,
Diego

Hi Diego,
In my understanding you want to define one or several level of approval depending on the CC assignement on each item.
lets take an example:
CC1 owner approver1, CC2 owner approver2 and CC3 approver3
For a SC:
-Item 1: 20% on CC1, and 80% on CC2
-Item 2: 20% on CC1, and 60% on CC2, and 20% on CC3
Then in the item level BADI, you'll define:
-Item1:
Level1 ==> approver1
Level2 ==> approver2
-Item2:
Level1 ==> approver1
Level2 ==> approver2
Level3 ==> approver3
I had this requirement on a project, and the hard part was not the BADI implementation, but the CC owner link with the SRM users (cause all approvers have to be declared on the SRM, and integrated in the SRM org plan).
Regards.
Vadim

Multiple Account Assignment details for Service PRs

Hi,
       I have developed a RFC for creating PRs. For multiple service PRs, multiple services are getting created but account assignment details getting created only for the first service line item. Iu2019m using BAPI_REQUISISTION_CREATE. Please provide me a solution.
Regards,
N.Senthil

hi all,
      the issue has been resolved by passing the below mentioned values.
      wa_item_data-distrib = '1'.      "FOR MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT based on the quanlity
      wa_item_data-part_inv = '1'.     "FOR MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT
solution got from
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE
http://www.sapnet.ru/viewtopic.php?p=9306
Regards,
N.Senthil

Partial invoice with multiple account assignment

I'm using PO with multiple account assignment with distribution by percentage and proportional distribution for partial invoice.
When i post invoice verification for this kind of orders the amount and quantity field in PO item are closed for update and no automatic proportional distribution has been performed.
The only possibility to update amount in case of partial invoice is to update amount of each account assignment manually (using account assignment button).
Why the amount and quantity fields are closed for update?
How i can post partial invoice for multiple account assignment order without manual distribution of changed amounts among different account assignments items?
Thanks in advance.

Thanks Charlie.
I am aware of that. But do we have that "partial invoice" field where we can select teh distribution as proportionate or sequence.
My POs item are having around 30 to 45 account assignments. In that case it is not possible to manual distribute the amount.
Please advise.
Thanks,

Multiple Account Assignment at the time of Good Receipt for one line item

Sap Members.
We have some contracts with cost center distributions that the exact amount is not known. These Blanket Orders require a receiving confirmation.then only we can conclude the cost center, If we create one line item with total amount of contract to one cost center, is there a way can we distribute this cost to the different cost centers at the moment receiving the goods
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Nick

Please Check SAP Notes - Oss Notes
With multiple acct. assignment, enter GR non-val. or cancel GR
Message no. 06417
Diagnosis
In the case of PO items assigned to more than one account, instead of valuation being carried out at the time of goods receipt, the relevant materials are not valuated until the invoice data is entered into the system.
Procedure
     Set the indicator for non-valuated goods receipts
or
     Cancel the GR indicator.
OSS-Notes.                              -
Version: 5        -
Validity: valid since 12.04.2007
Note 204252 - Valuated goods receipt for multiple account assignment
Summary
Symptom
You cannot use the valuated goods receipt function in combination with multiple account assignment.
Other terms
EKPO-WEUNB, screen 0113, ME21, purchase order, 06417, 06 417
Reason and Prerequisites
We have not implemented this function since users who post goods receipts would have to determine the distribution to individual account assignment items during partial deliveries. Generally, users cannot or should not determine this.
An automatic distribution also causes problems and is also not implemented due to technical reasons

Delivery cost with multiple account assignment

Dear SAP gurus,
I found a problem in here. In my company we are using multiple account assignment in PO with multiple asset entered in one line. This PO actually will have customs and delivery cost inside of it, however it is not know at the time of PO creation. When the forwarder send the goods, sometimes the shipment can contain more than one PO as well, thus it is impossible to determine the exact value of delivery cost at the time of PO creation.
When the goods are delivered in the FOB point, the vendor deliver goods will send the invoice for goods, and when the goods delivered to our warehouse, then the forwarder will deliver the invoice for the delivery cost. So there is no sequence of the invoicing. Sometimes the goods are invoice earlier than the delivery cost, sometimes it is later.
My requirements are to make sure that the delivery cost is being posted to the asset account of the goods that are being delivered in the PO. I have tried these options:
a. Planned delivery cost inside the PO --> when posting invoice for planned delivery cost, got error message that there is no delivery cost in the PO. I think this is because of the multiple account assignment because when creating PO and inputting the delivery cost i do get warning that no delivery cost for multiple account assignment,
b. Unplanned delivery cost --> ONLY work if the invoice for delivery cost and goods are being posted as one document, which is not the case in here.
c. Separate PO for delivery cost --> got issue in which the person who supposed to create the PO for delivery cost, would not have any idea what asset no to be used (worse --> if the asset is being delivered partially).
Do you have any idea of what to be done in this case? Please help.
Best regards,
John.

See while making the invoice for the delivery cost you have selected the aggreation as planned delivery cost and in the PO you have not maintained the deilvery conditions .The pricing conditions which you have maintained must ebe have condition category - delivery cost .The system will not give thr message thhat you have not mainatined the delivery cost .If you have condition as mandatorty it will show that the conditions ( mandatory) are not maintain.In order to maintain the delivery cost you have to check your conditions whether they are delivery cost related conditins and if then maintain there values in PO and check while doing invoice you will get.
You have also the option of entering the delivery cost at time of the Invoice as unplanned delivery cost ...........
Just check your conditions which you have maintained the calculation schema as delivery conditions and maintain the values and do the invoice proceesing .
It is not advisableto cretae the sepearted PO for the delivety cost as it is not good way of doing the proceess.
Regards
sunny

Limti PO with Multiple account assignment Problem

Hi,
Can we create limit PO with Multiple account assignment.
If yes, i have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post service entry sheet the value is posting for only first one cost centre/Order but not all.
So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
Reagrds,
JM

Hi Summer,
We have implemented SAP Note 1165524 for multiple account assignment as suggested, and it is working fine for New POs.
But we have old Purchase order which still have wrong commitment, and GR and IR are already posted for this PO, we have to reduce the commitment to Zero.
there is one solution for this is set 'No further Invoice expected' check box selected in this PO, but in our case PO went into error in process after doing this.
Please help me to reduce commitment to zero for this old PO
Thanks in advance
Vikas

PO with single & multiple account assignment

Hi expert,
I got one PO with single & multiple account assignment. How should I book invoice. I try using MIRA for items with multiple acct and MIRO for items with single acct. I works but can I do it in one shot instead of splitting. If so, how?
One more thing: if I got invoice saved in MIRA but without any items. It can't be changed. It say it is schedule by background. How could I change it?
Thx

Hi
You can use MIRO to check book the invoice for both single account assignment and mulitple acc assignment.
You have to select the lay out Account assignment with cost center.
For Multiple account assignment you can see the Button in the line item, click it to maintain the multiple account assignment.
Hope it helps.
Thanks /Karthik

Invoice issue for Multiple Account assigned PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for