Invoice list based on sold to party not
Hi all,
As per my client requirement, Sold to party is one only but there will be different bill to party & Payer.
Only one main sold to party is paying all bills generated on behalf of different payer. The reason to make payer is, client wants accountability on payer wise. So sold to party is one & different payer.
Now Ii require to raise a invoice list based on sold to party wise not payer or bill to party wise.
Invoice list getting spillted because of different partner.
How to do that.
Please suggest me as soon as possible.
Thanks
Shobhit
Hi Shobhit
To meet your requirement you need to go with a enhancement then your requirement will be fulfilled. So you need to discuss with your Technical team also regarding this issue
Thanks and Regards
Srinath
Similar Messages
-
Ship to party,Bill to party, payer, sold to party not shown in partners Tab
Hi,
Kindly note that Ship to party,Bill to party, payer, sold to party not shown in partners Tab.
Eventhough SP,SH,BP,PY are assigned to customer KU only.
And we have assigned Partner Functions ot account Group.
Still Ship to party,Bill to party, payer, sold to party not shown in partners Tab
Please help.
Regards,
Rajkumar.CHi
Please check the following setting once again in spro > sales and distribution > baisc function > partner determination > For customer master
1. check for partner determination procedure AG , if you have created a new one then please check whether it is there in the list.
2.Select the AG and then check for whether the partner function has been made mandatory in the procedure or not.
tick mark SP, BP,SH,PY , since Sold to party should not be allowed to change so mark it as Not Modifable
3. partner determination procedure assingment for the account group. AG should be assinged to your account group
4. Account Group Function assingment - Make sure your all the partner function SP,BP.PY.SH has been assinged to the Account group here.
Thanks
RB -
Change order type based on sold to party
Hi all,
Is there any user exit to change the order type based on Sold to party.
Eg: if any user select some sold to party during sales order creation then using sold to party the order type is changed.
Any suggestions welcome.
Regards,Hi Navadeep,
Please try with these
The program MV45AFZB
USEREXIT_CHECK_VBAK
This user exit can be used to carry out additional checks (e.g. for
completion) in the document header. The system could, for example,
check whether certain shipping conditions are allowed for a
particular customer group.
The program MV45AFZZ
USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION
This user exit can be used to modify the attributes of the screen
fields.
To do this, the screen fields are allocated to so-called
modification groups 1 - 4 and can be edited together during a
modification in ABAP. If a field has no field name, it cannot be
allocated to a group.
The usage of the field groups (modification group 1-4) is as
follows:
- Modification group 1: Automatic modification with transaction
MFAW
- Modification group 2: It contains 'LOO' for step loop fields
- Modification group 3: For modifications which depend on check
tables or on other fixed information
- Modification group 4: is not used
The FORM routine is called up for every field of a screen. If you require changes to be made, you must make them in this user exit.
This FORM routine is called up by the module FELDAUSWAHL.
See the Screen Painter manual for further information on structuring
the interface.
USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT
Use this user exit to fill user-specific statistics update tables.
The user exit is called up by the FORM routine BELEG-SICHERN before
the COMMIT command.
Note
If a standard field is changed, the field r185d-dataloss is set to
X. The system queries this indicator at the beginning of the safety
routine. This is why this indicator must also be set during the
maintenance of user-specific tables that are also to be saved.
USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE
Use this user exit to make certain changes or checks immediately
before saving a document. It is the last possibility for changing or
checking a document before posting.
The user exit is carried out at the beginning of the FORM routine
BELEG_SICHERN.
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali. -
Can pricing based on sold to party instead of ship to party
hi all,
I want to know that can pricing based on sold to party instead of ship to party ?
if it is possible then please tell me how it can done ??????????
please tell me the procedure how can it done
thanks in advanceHi,
Pricing is based on the sold to party only.
Generally it is the sold to party who will raise the order, Here ship to party just receives the goods that were ordered by the sold to party.
In VK11 U maintain the Records based on the customer and material or based on the material.
When u raise the sales order for a particular customer then if any condition recors are founfd for that particular customer and material it will take or else it will take the material price only. so here pricing happens based on sold to party.
Reward points if it helps,
Regards,
Sree
Message was edited by:
sree s -
Hi,
Our requirement is that while creating SO the tax should be as per sold to party , as ref. to below thread
Tax based on Sold to Party or Bill to Party. i have maintain A' in
Go to IMG Path --> SD --> Basic Functions --> Taxes --> Maintain Sales Tax ID number determination
but still system is taking tax codes ref. to ship to party insted of sold to part
out requirement is Sold to party is from gujrat Tax CST and ship to part is in maharashtra Tax VAT and our plant is also in maharshtra but system is taking tax of maharshtra insted of GUJRAT.
regards,
zafar
Edited by: zkarnalkar on Feb 28, 2011 10:53 AMBetter try to update in a positive manner as to whether the suggestions resolved your issue and if so, which one has helped you. This will help others who have similar requirement.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
Billing Due List based on Ship to Party
Hi,
I have a scenario where in I have multiple ship to parties in a single sales order . So there are different deliveries for all the different ship to parties (i.e Delivery Split). But I need to process the Billing due List based on the Ship to party. The Bill to party and the Payer is same for all the ship to parties. Let me have an example.
Let the Sold to party -
111
Bill to Party -
111
Payer -
111
Ship to Party 1 -- 222
Ship to Party 2 -- 333
Sales order --- 99999 has 10 line items, 5 each going to each ship to party. Now I am having Multiple deliveries .
del 1-> 44444 (Del NO)--> 222
del 1-> 44445 (Del NO)--> 222
del 1-> 44446 (Del NO)--> 222
del 1-> 44447 (Del NO)--> 333
del 1-> 44448 (Del NO)--> 333
del 1-> 44449 (Del NO)--> 333
Now I want a single invoice for del 44447,44448,44449 and one more Single invoice for del 44444,44445,44446.
So I need to have a Billing due list based on the Ship to Party. Please provide me if any solutions and also let me know if I am missing anything in the Standard SAP to achieve this.
Thankyou,
Rakesh Tummala.Hi
USEREXIT_FILL_VBRK_VBRP will not work since it is the billing due index (VKDFS) that you want to add ship to ID as the sort criterion. The proper user exit are actually:
- USEREXIT_VKDFS_SORTKRI_SALES for order related billing
- USEREXIT_VKDFS_SORTKRI_DEL for delivery related billing
they are in include module V05IEXIT.
For delivery related billing it is a one line code as below
VKDFS-SORTKRI = LLIKP-KUNNR
Order related billing is a little more complicated because you can have ship at both header and item level. If you need this as well post a follow up
Once you have this done, then you can use the sort criterion field in VF04 to do ship to selection for you -
IW31 Service Order created with reference order,sold to party not populated
Hello
If one decides to create a new service order with IW31 but based on an old one using reference order field, not all data's are popullated to the new document:
It works for some data's like :
- operations
- components
It does not work for the following data's:
- service order description
- sold to party
- main workcenter
Does someone know if it is possible in the customizing to determine "copy rules" in order popullating values from the reference document to the new?
Is it a bug or a SAP standard behaviour?
Kind regards
ChrisHello,
The behaviour you have described is correct - Description, partners, main work center are not copied from reference order. See note 197581.
-Paul -
Sold-to-party not getting updated
Hi
we are trnasferring outboud deliveries from system A to system B. in system a the delivery is with reference to order and when it comes to B we have custom delivery type which without order reference. we are using BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CREATENOREF to transfer the delivery. all the data is updated correctly but the sold-to-party is not updated. In fact in the FM there is not import parameter for entering sold-to-party.
In system B we tried to create a delivery without order reference using the same ship to party , in this case the sold-to-party is picked up by the system automatically. So when only replicating with the BAPI the sold-to-party is not picked up automatically. How do i update the sold-to-party. is there any FM to do this??
thanks
sankarTake a look at the OSS note 1069352 - it won't solve the issue but might explain something.
Try using EXTENSION_OUT / EXTENSION_IN to add sold-to. Otherwise you might have to use something different. E.g. FM BAPI_DELIVERYPROCESSING_EXEC technically allows creating the deliveries in a scenario that you're describing:
The preceding document can be in another system. To ensure that the entire requested quantity is generated in the delivering system and the corresponding requirements are planned in the planning system, for example, for cross-system deliveries SAP recommends creating unchecked deliveries (techn_control-check_mode = 'A').
There are also IDocs for deliveries. Hope this helps... -
Invoice List Header text disabled (VF22) and note 357732 missing
1. Can any body please let me know the Invoice List text Determination? Presently, My Invoice list screen is showing the Header text tab is disable, if possible please let me know how to do enable so that I can enter into the Text.
2. I checked SAP Note # 943390. But this note has link to note 357732 which does not exist.
Please let me know if any work around.
Thanks in advance.Hi Laxmipathi sir,
as you said i went in the bussiness area account assignment and checked it and foound that the Sales area, distributin channel and division are assiogned to rule called 003 -Buss Area Det.from sales org/dist.channel item div.
but there are other two.which were not assigned.
001-buss area det.from plant/dividion(T134G)
002-buss area det.from Sales area (TVTA).
so do you think this is the reason it is not picking it up in the invoice list,
i have discussed with one of the SD person here he said even though you don't assign them it shoudn't bother because the buss area is getting picked in invoice
so could you please tell me what should i ask that person or what i have to tell them about this.
thanks
Jay -
MWST condition type based on Sold-To-Party country
Hello,
I need MWST condition type to be determined with Country,Sold-To-Party country,Tax Classification1 from Customer master and Tax classification from Material master. But in condition table I could not find filed for Sold-to-party Country.
Also as per standard SAP tax gets determined on ship-to-party country, which we want on sold-to-party country.
Regards,
SureshHello
You can find solution to your requirement through program MV45AFZZ with routine USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMK
Refer SAP Note 21734 - Determining sales tax (VAT) from any partner for complete solution.
Thanks & Regards
JP -
Block sold-to-party not ship-to-party
Hi experts,
Let us assume that i have a create a sales order which has sold to partt customer A and ship to party customer B.
Now, in our SAP system, if customer A is not block during credit limit check and customer A is block at credit limit we cannot delivery the goods.
Is there any possibility to , in this case, the goods to be delivered even ship-to-party is blocked at credit limit?I was wrong with credit block.
In my situation we're talking about XD05 blocking.
So the problem is we use transaction XD05 where we can block customer at order, delivery and billing.
For example, if customer A has order block in XD05 than if we create a order and ship-to-party is customer A that we cannot create order.
We have a similar situation in our company and i'm wondering if is possible to create a order even the ship-to-party is block to order in XD05.
is this possible? -
How to stop Invoice Split For particular Sold to Party
Dear All
Whenever we create a billing document for a particular customer, based on the No. Of Line Item, it is getting splitted. My client is using SAP 4.7. Please let me know what could be the problem
Regards
Paulraj
Edited by: paulraj S on Feb 25, 2009 1:06 PM
Edited by: paulraj S on Feb 25, 2009 1:56 PMWhenever we create a billing document for a particular
customer, based on the No. Of Line Item, it is getting splitted
Do you mean to say that for other customers, invoice is not splitting based on line items ?? If so, you need to provide more details on
- whether order type is different
- whether item category is different
Unless some setting is maintained differently or in sale order for that customer, if any data is different at line item level, then you will get invoice split. Check all the item level datas
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
Buss.Area not getting transferred to invoice list
Hi Gurus,
hope u all r doin good outhere, i have an issue with bussiness area not getting populated or transferrred for Invoice list that are released to accounting .
the scenario here is: in the accounting overview under the Billing Invoice(VF03) we are able to see the buss area against the customer acct line item and the GL acctline item, but when we go into the Accounting overview under Invoice List (VF23), the Buss area is not getting populated against the Customer lineitem..., we are not able to figure out what is missing...is it in the configuration...,
we are on 4.6 , and we have an OSS note 69499 (given below) on this issue which says
Summary
Symptom
Business areas are not transferred for invoice lists that are released to financial accounting.
Additional key words
GSBER TVTA VF21 SAPMV62S factoring discount
Cause and prerequisites
This was not programmed
Solution
A solution is only available in the standard system as of Release 3.0D.
You can make the attached advance correction that uses a user exit.
In this solution, the business area is copied from the sales area table (TVTA) for the sales area of the invoice list header. A business area determination on plant/division level (T134G) is not possible because the item information of the individual billing documents is no longer available in the invoice list.
Source code corrections
and we have contacted SAP , some one from SAP side told that the program is existing in that userexit already with our 4.6c,
someone has suggested that in OB65 the check box is not activated against the comp code i use, but i have found that to be the check mark for the financial statements at the buss area level..will that make any diff to my issue... is it something with the FI part or SD part which do you think is incorrect ....any kind of suggestions pertaining to this issue .here would be helpful.
some body please throw some light on it, i would be very much grateful.
Thanks in advance
JayHi Laxmipathi sir,
as you said i went in the bussiness area account assignment and checked it and foound that the Sales area, distributin channel and division are assiogned to rule called 003 -Buss Area Det.from sales org/dist.channel item div.
but there are other two.which were not assigned.
001-buss area det.from plant/dividion(T134G)
002-buss area det.from Sales area (TVTA).
so do you think this is the reason it is not picking it up in the invoice list,
i have discussed with one of the SD person here he said even though you don't assign them it shoudn't bother because the buss area is getting picked in invoice
so could you please tell me what should i ask that person or what i have to tell them about this.
thanks
Jay -
Billing document not relenvent for invoice list
Dear forum members,
For one sales area I can create a invoice list from a billing document, but not for the other.In debug mode first one is relevent for invoice list processing ( VBUK-RELIK), but for another sales area ,thus staus is not relevent.
Partner detemrination was different for both the above sales area.This was the only differnce. Partner determination is correct in both.What can be the other possible reasons for the status NOT RELEVENT for invoice list.
Best Regards,
KanwalDear Goyal,
-->Check the configuration settings if you are using diffirent Invoice documents in two sales areas.
IMG Path is SPRO>Sales and Distribution>Billing>Billing documents>Invoice lists.
-->Check the data in the customer master in the transaction VD02.
Go to Sales area data tab-->Billing document here you check whether you are maintaining the Invoice list dates or not.
-->Check the Partner determination procedure assignment to the Invoice List type at Header level and item level.
Because you are mentioned that partner dtermination wad different.
Header assignment path.
IMG>SPRO>Sales and Distribution->Basic functions>partner determination>set up partner determination.>Set up partner determination for billing header-->Prtner determination procedure assignment.
Item assignment path
IMG>SPRO>Sales and Distribution->Basic functions>partner determination>set up partner determination.>Set up partner determination for billing item -->Prtner determination procedure assignment.
I hope it will help you
Regards,
Murali. -
Incident Search helps relations between Sold-to Party & Configuration Item
Hi experts,
Can someone help me to know what is the best approach for the following scenario:
When I select de Sold-to Party e.g (BP 70), then when I try to use the search help for "Configuration item" it should filter only for my BP, but this is NOT happening. The result that is showing are all items of all BP's.
How can I modify the BOL Object "Product" Search help or I have to create a "Z".
Is this the correct approach?
Thanks & Kind Regards,
César FelceHi,
In you can create a z class with interface IF_BSP_WD_CUSTOM_F4_CALLBACK.
In get v method of configuration item put below logic.
ls_map type if_bsp_wd_valuehelp=>gtype_param_mapping
lt_inmap type if_bsp_wd_valuehelp=>gtype_param_mapping_tab
lt_outmap type if_bsp_wd_valuehelp=>gtype_param_mapping_tab
ls_map-f4_attr = 'BP_ID'.
ls_map-context_attr = bp value.
append ls_map to lt_inmap.
append ls_map to lt_outmap.
create object rv_valuehelp_descriptor
type cl_bsp_wd_valuehelp_f4descr
exporting
iv _help_id = '(zclass)'
iv_help_id_kind = if_bsp_wd_valuehelp_f4descr=>help_id_kind_comp
iv_inputmapping= lt_inmap
iv_output_mapping = lt_outmap
iv_trigger_submit = abap_true.
Now in method if_bsp_wd_custom_f4_callback~retrieve_custom_values of your zclass put logic
check is_search_help is not initial and is_search_help-selopt is not initial.
loop at is_search_help-selopt assigning <fs_selopt>.
check <fs_selopt>-shlpfield = 'BP_ID'.
lv_bpid = <fs_selopt>-low.
endloop.
Now you have your sold to party id in lv_bpid.
now write the logic to fetch configuration items based on sold to party id and fill ct_results_tab which will your output searchhelp.
Thanks,
Tejaswini P.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Combined audio & video from iMac mini DVI & headphone ports to HDMI to TV
I presently have my iMac connected to my Sony Bravia tv so that the video goes from the mini DVI port through a converter to HDMI to a 25 foot cable, a HDMI coupler and another 25 foot cable to the TV. The video quality is good since I use 24 AWG cab
-
Kernel panic after installing additional ram
Hi there. (I think this should go here, not in laptop issues because it seems to be more hardware-related) I have a laptop Acer Aspire 2920Z with 2x512 Mb stock ram and I recently bought an memory upgrade 2x2gb. Any of them works when inserted separa
-
[SOLVED] Xorg 1.8 Warnings
Hey all, This isn't a huge issue, as everything is working fine (afaik), but after upgrading to Xorg1.8, i started getting the following warning when starting X: [ 797.336] (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/OTF/" does not exist. If anyone has come
-
How do I remove something from my Places?
Hi, I was doing an update for a sound system and by mistake dragged the download into my places instead of my desktop. I've tried to (control + click) the download in my Places and when the list comes up for Places/Sidebar preferences the sound syste
-
Licence IP check only on first interface?
Hello, our hoster had to change the ip configuration of our machines. We lost the IP mentioned in the licence. So we ordered a new licence via our customer for the new ip (which is configured on hme1, hme0 is the service lan used for backup etc.). We