Invoice message O/P generated at both header and item via MIRO

HI
We have a SRM PO with ERS fuctionality and have been able to pot ERS invoice successfully with message output to SUS SRM client from SAP system. Each ERS invoice have only one message output with one Idoc.
However when same process is followed to transaction MIRO to post invoice manually we have output mesages both on header level as well as at line item level.
Impact: Due to message duplication at header and line item, as a result two IDOC are generated in SAP posting duplicate invoice document on SRM SUS system.
Question: Do have standard setup to control output message determination defined at line and header level. If yest please suggest suitable changes for output determination setting
Regards
Prashanth K Saralaya

Thanks for the suggestion.
Issue was resolved after custom coding through Maintian Requirment...And noticed behavior is standard (confirmed by SAP).
Regards
Prashanth K Saralaya
Edited by: Prashanth Saralaya on Nov 29, 2010 5:38 AM

Similar Messages

Frieght should appear in both header and item levels

Hi SAP gurus,
while doing the Sales Order transaction(va01), frieght should appear in both header and item levels, how can we configure in SAP.
Thanks in advance.
Sathya........

Hi Sathya,
You can maintain the Fright condition type (KF00) in your pricing procedure and maintain the condition record for that as per your requirement, or you enter manually at Sales Oreder it will come at header and item level.
I hope it will solve your problem,
Regards,
Murali.

Printing of Condition value at both header and Item level

Dear Sap Gurus,
Please any body tell me how to print the condition value at both header and at item level in PO print out. ie. I am using RA00 at both item and header level and i want to print this value at both header and item level.
Thanks and Regards,
Patil

Hi,
Please check with abaper is he calling the function like mention below or not
CALL FUNCTION 'PRICING'
    EXPORTING
      calculation_type = 'B'
or (calculation types = as in condition type)
      comm_head_i      = komk
      comm_item_i      = komp
      preliminary      = ' '
      no_calculation   = ' '
    IMPORTING
      comm_head_e      = komk
      comm_item_e      = komp
    TABLES
      tkomv            = i_komv.
regards
Edited by: bvdv on Jul 8, 2009 7:35 PM

Delivery tolerance at header and item level in sales order

Dear All,
My client wants to maintain delivery tolerance at both header and item level. NOTE: The tolerance at sales order header is different than the delivery tolerance at sales order item.
eg if i maintain 3% plus and minus tolerance at item, the header level tolerance can be 2%.
Also if there are more than 1 line items, the system should give warning message, when it finds that the delivery tolerance at item level can be maintained but that of the header level cannot be maintained and vice varsa.
Awaiting an early help and thankful for the same in advance.
Regards,
Avnesh Kamdar

Hi Avnesh,
Delivery tolerance can be made in the customer master,sales org data ---delivery tab.
Delivery tolerance is always at item level.
Reward points if it helps.
Regards
Karan

Same condition type on header and item level = printing problem

Hi
I have a customer using some condition types on both item level and header level in quotations, orders, invoices ...
In the pricing procedures it is customized (V_T683S-DRUKZ) that the conditions must be printed on header level (that is at the bottom of the documents).
My job is to make the Smartform to print the documents, and I want it of course to be as close to SAP standard as possible.
SAP standard will print these conditions on header level even if the conditions are at item level, but my customer wants the conditions created on header level to be printed on header level and conditions created on item level to be printed on item level.
I'm no pricing expert, so my question is:
Will it be fair if I tell the customer that using the same condition types on header and item level is bad practices - or at least bad karma?
Best regards
Thomas Madsen Nielsen

Hi Shiva Ram and Madhu
I have no problem understanding header vs. item conditions, so I really don't see anything in oss note 876617, that is relevant in this case.
Madhu - I do not agree that everything is fine. My issue is that I want to stick as closely to SAP standard customizing as possible. In SAP standard customizing of a condition type you can use the flag V_T683S-DRUKZ to determine if the condition should be printed on header OR item level - you can not choose both header AND item level.
I have a SAP standard smartform using two functions modules for reading header and item conditions. RV_PRICE_PRINT_ITEM and RV_PRICE_PRINT_HEAD. These function modules are based on the DRUKZ customizing flag and a condition marked for printing on header level will be supplied by RV_PRICE_PRINT_HEAD even when the condition is on item level.
My point is: SAP standard customizing does not support printing of same condition on both header and item level. I can of course write tons of code to work around this problem, but that would be bad practices

Header and Item Conditions in EBP PO

HI All,
I've just checked the pricing conditions in spro of SRM and as per my business requirement I need to maintain both header and item conditions and replicate the values back to r/3 in extended classic scenario like freight,surcharge,discounts e.t.c, with this functionality can we meet the requirement or any additional settings required,kindly advice me.
Thanks and Regards,
Sathya kumar.

Hi,
Header conditions in PO does not exist !
You will have to develop it.
Then you will have to use ECS BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI for modifying the data you send to ECC PO in order to not send the whole price calculated into SRM but dispatch on one side the price before condition and on the other side the different condition type.
The goal is that R/3 should be able to recalculate the final price based on the condition types you entered in SRM.
Kind regards,
Yann

In LSMW using BAPI Scenario, how to assign the same file to HEADER and ITEM

Hi,
i got a problem when we are in ASSIGN FILES step how to assign the same file to both HEADER and ITEM Structures?

Hi,
When defining the file in specify files step check the option 'Data for Multiple Source Structures'.
Hope it helps.
Thanks,
Mahesh

Checkbox in header and item level records.

Hello Freinds,
I have a requirment in which I need to display checkboxes in front of header as well as item level records. I am trying to make a copy of standard transaction VL37. This transaction uses the REUSE_ALV_HIERSEQ_LIST_DISPLAY for displaying header and item level data. I debugged and found that in the alv layout there is a field with name box name. If we pass the name of header internal table to that field then we can get checkbox in front of header level records and if we pass item level internal table name then it shows the checkbox in front of item level records.
Can anyone provide some possibility of adding checkbox for both header and item level records while using the same ALV FM.

Hello Harsh,
I am also kind of facing the same issue. I have used the FM REUSE_ALV_HIERSEQ_LIST_DISPLAY for ALV display. And I need to add checkbox at item level.
I have tried to add checkbox through field catalog. Following is the code I'm writing.
l_wa_fieldcat-fieldname = l_c_flag.
l_wa_fieldcat-tabname   = l_c_item.
l_wa_fieldcat-checkbox = abap_true.
*l_wa_fieldcat-edit_mask = abap_f.
l_wa_fieldcat-edit      = abap_true.
l_wa_fieldcat-key       = abap_true.
l_wa_fieldcat-seltext_m = l_c_flag.
APPEND l_wa_fieldcat to em_it_fieldcat.
But in this case the checkbox appears in disabled form.
Can you please help? Could you be a bit elaborate on your answer i.e. the code snippet? Many thanks.
Regards,
Debapriya

Payment Terms(Different at header and Item)

Hi,
While creating an order with two line items having different materials, A different payment term is picking for one material at item level which is different from header.
Where as for other material same payment term is coming at both header and item level.
Could please let me know where do we maintain entry to pick a payment term which comes at item level.

Mohan Hi,
Please also not that SAP Standard set the same payment term at the header and the item level. As mentioned, the payment term default value at the sales order comes from the customer master data.
Best regards.
Ido

RE: Header And Item Condition

Hi
How the system will put the value in my sales order if i select both Headre condition and item condition for one condition type in v/06. my question is for item condition we have to maintain condition record where in header we do not require.Will I have to enter the value manually in order or the system automatically determine it.
And for For which condition type we select both Header and item Condition
regards
debasish

Dear Stilianos,
You can maintain item level condition type only.
Henece you can maintain the values at item level based on your requirement.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Check box in header and item

Hi,
     I have a small problem regarding the checkboxes in the hierarchical Display.The challenge is i am unable to get the checkboxes for both header and item details in the hierarchy display.
                      Either header or item is getting the checkbox not both. Also, if a header checkbox is checked all the items corresponding to it should get checked automatically.
                    So please let me know the solution to this mystery.

Hi,
1. If you want to calculate tax in FB50 , you have to select teh Calculate tax indicator in the header & you have to give Tax code in teh respective line .
Even if you give tax code in the line item without tick the Calculate Tax indicator in the header system won't calculate tax.
2.Tax codes are created under teh TAX procedure.Thisd tax procedure is assgined to country.
So the tax codes you are creating are country specific.
chandra

How can we revise the pricing both at header and item level of sales order?

Dear All,
Now there's one issue of the pricing to me. i want to revise the pricing both at header and item level of sales order. but after i finished the cutomize and tested it, it's more different as i thought. i found that the pricing can revise at the one side only,for example, if i revise the pricing at item level and it's grey and can't be revised at the header. on the other hand, it's the same result what's happened at item.
So, in my opinion, we can't revise the pricing both at header and item, right? if not, please give me more advices and teach me how to solve the problem. thanks a lot.

Dear Lakshmipathi,
Thanks a lot for your kindly and useful answer for me and I learn more for the pricing technology.
I didn't notice the way that you reminded ago therefore I also saw the button at the condition tab. And your suggestion makes me know more.
And I had tested the way that you said, I met with a question. Below is my opinion for my testing.
I had created one SO and the pricing was $10, then I revised the pricing from 10 to 15 by VK11. It can't be updated automatically at SO and I must update it manually by clicking the "Update" button. This is OK for my testing, but I have another question to disturb you for the use of "Active" button. When I click the button and nothing is responsed, it's quite different what you said. So, please give more detail for the Active button. Thanks a lot.

Incompletion Log V50UC EXCTR inconsistency at Delivery header and Item lev

Hello Experts
Incompletion Log V50UC EXCTR inconsistency at Delivery header and Item lev
This fields and structure is defined both at header and Item Incompletion procedure .
But at Header level , the field is getting removed , but not at Item level
V50UC- EXCTR.
Can you let me know what to do about this inconsistency / any SAP Note etc .
REgards
Rohit

Hello
This Incompletion log is related to Foreign Trade.
Check maintain required foreign trade data at Item
or If foreign trade is not active for your this business process..Check your config for Incompletion procedure for foreign trade by use TCode VI29.
I hope this suffice your requirment.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Header and Item Text is not replicating from ECC6.0 to SAP CRM 7.0

Hi SAP Experts,
When the text is added at header and item in Texts tab from SAP CRM then this is transferring into ECC6.0 but the otherway round is not working i.e., from ECC6.0 to SAP CRM.
Would appreciate for giving solution.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
Succhi

Hi Succhi
There are a number of oss notes to check: 1169856, 720147, 550343, and 549209
Please make sure that the text tables are included in the filter as per note 720147.
Also include the configuration as per note 549209.
It is necessary that the same text types exist in both systems so please review the configuration carefully.
I hop this helps.
Best Regards
Gavin

How to header and item data of sales order using bapi interface

hi friends,
   i am geetha, i having a problem like how to upload sales oder header and item data through va01 tcode using BAPI FUNCTION MODULES.
i need bapi function modules for header adn item data and brief explation on that , how to pass importing and tables parameters to get exact output .
regards
geetha.

Use : BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2
Sales order: Create Sales Order
Functionality
You can use this method to create sales orders.
You must enter at least sales order header data (via ORDER_HEADER_IN structure) and partner data (via the ORDER_PARTNERS table) as input parameters.
Enter the item data via the ORDER_ITEMS_IN table. You can allocate item numbers manually, by filling in the relevant fields, or the system does it, according to the settings for Customizing, by leaving the relevant fields blank.
If you have configurable items, you must enter the configuration data in the ORDER_CFGS_REF, ORDER_CFGS_INST, ORDER_CFGS_PART_OF and ORDER_CFGS_VALUE tables.
Credit cards can be transferred via the BAPICCARD structure, on the one hand, data for card identification, on the other, data for a transaction which has taken place in an external system.
Once you have created the sales order successfully, you will receive the document number (SALESDOCUMENT field). Any errors that may occur will be announced via the RETURN parameter.
If no sales area has been created in the sales order header, then the system creates the sales area from the sold-to party or ship-to party, who has been entered in the partner table. If a clear sales area cannot be created, you will receive a system message, and the sales order will not be created.
Notes
1. Mandatory entries:
ORDER_HEADER_IN : DOC_TYPE     Sales document type
                   SALES_ORG    Sales organization
                   DISTR_CHAN   Distribution channel
                   DIVISION     Division
ORDER_PARTNERS..: PARTN_ROLE   Partner role, SP sold-to party
                   PARTN_NUMB   Customer number
ORDER_ITEMS_IN..: MATERIAL     Material number
2. Ship-to party:
If no ship-to party is entered, use the following: Ship-to party =
sold-to party.
3. Commit control:
The BAPI does not have a database commit. This means that the relevant application must leave the commit, in order that can be carried out on on the database. The BAPI BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT is available for this.
4. German key words:
The following key words must be entered in German, independantly of
the logon language:
DOC_TYPE     Sales document type, for example: TA for standard order
PARTN_ROLE   Partner role, for example: WE for ship-to party
Further information
You can find further information in the OSS. The note 93091 contains general information on the BAPIs in SD.
Parameters
SALESDOCUMENTIN
ORDER_HEADER_IN
ORDER_HEADER_INX
SENDER
BINARY_RELATIONSHIPTYPE
INT_NUMBER_ASSIGNMENT
BEHAVE_WHEN_ERROR
LOGIC_SWITCH
TESTRUN
CONVERT
SALESDOCUMENT
RETURN
ORDER_ITEMS_IN
ORDER_ITEMS_INX
ORDER_PARTNERS
ORDER_SCHEDULES_IN
ORDER_SCHEDULES_INX
ORDER_CONDITIONS_IN
ORDER_CONDITIONS_INX
ORDER_CFGS_REF
ORDER_CFGS_INST
ORDER_CFGS_PART_OF
ORDER_CFGS_VALUE
ORDER_CFGS_BLOB
ORDER_CFGS_VK
ORDER_CFGS_REFINST
ORDER_CCARD
ORDER_TEXT
ORDER_KEYS
EXTENSIONIN
PARTNERADDRESSES
Exceptions
Function Group
2032

Invoice message O/P generated at both header and item via MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for