Invoice Posting: Quantity full but amout partially

Dear Experts,
We use GR based Invoice verification. PO qty 36,988 , amount 4,068,680.00, GR done fully.
First invoice posted with qty 36,988 but amount 2,141,040.00
Now user can't able to post invoice for remaining amount. User should have put qty partially not full 36,988
How can user post remaining amount 4,068,680 - 2,141,040 = 1927640

Thank you for reply,
I cancelled the posted doc by mr8m, cancelled doc created with a message " you need to manually clear the cancellation".
how can i manually clear the doc
Please help
Kind regards,
Zusen

Similar Messages

Excise invoice posted and paid but stock is yet to removed from Warehouse

Dear All,
Please provide solution for given below issue,
1.Invoicing was done in 09.09.2009 and excise invoice has also been posted and paid to Govt. but the material is still lying
   at our works as consignee was not having valid road permit.
2.Now the consignee has been changed but sold to party is same and the road permit is also available
3.Excise duty revised to 10.30% from 8.24% and the new price breakup has been provided by the customer as per new
    duties/tax rates.
Please suggest the best way to handel this issue.
Regards
AJIT K SINGH

>
AJIT K SINGH wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Please provide solution for given below issue,
>
> 1.Invoicing was done in 09.09.2009 and excise invoice has also been posted and paid to Govt. but the material is still lying
>    at our works as consignee was not having valid road permit.
> 2.Now the consignee has been changed but sold to party is same and the road permit is also available
> 3.Excise duty revised to 10.30% from 8.24% and the new price breakup has been provided by the customer as per new
>     duties/tax rates.
>
> Please suggest the best way to handel this issue.
>
> Regards
> AJIT K SINGH
Take help of excise or tax consultant,based on their advice you can proceed further.
Either you have to revere all postings from excise to sales order.
Maintain new pricing in condition record.
Complete sales cycle including sales invoice with new price.
Create excise invoice.
For excise duty payment seek help of excise or tax consultant

Service entry sheet - invoice posted on SES

Dear all,
Does anybody knows if it is possible to see on Service entry sheet (SES) level if there was already an invoice (via MIRO) posted on it?
Either a full or partial invoice?
I have the tables ESSR, ESLL, ESLH, but I can't seem to find if there was already an invoice posted on a specific SES...
Many thanks!
Best regards.

Venu,
Thanks!
Do you have any idea in which tables I can retrieve these values (Settled value/Invoiced qty)?
Table: ESSR = Service Entry sheet header (contains Package number & SES no)
Table: ESLL = Service entry line item, but not settled value (contains Package no, not SES no).
What is the indicator (green, yellow or red light) next to the Settled value in the ME2S report?
Many thanks!
Best regards.

MRBR release invoices automatically quantity variance

For a purchase order item there are several good receipts
and several invoices. Although the quantity of the goods receipt is smaller than the quantity invoiced, the quantity of goods received is bigger than the first invoice. So the first invoice should be released automatically. However no invoice is released!
Is this how SAP works standard, or can I customize this somewhere?
Example:
quantity received: 100 + 100 = 200
quantity invoiced:
invoice 1:   100
invoice 2:   200
total    :   300

Hello,
The GR-based IV flag is not on for the item. Thank you for your answer, but is does not help me.
I believe there is no solution for this problem.
This is the way how SAP works. At the moment an invoice is posted the systems checks the quantity invoiced and received (and other checks). If something is wrong the invoice gets a block at that moment. Later with the automatically release of invoices the systems checks if the quantity variance still exists.
With tolerance limit DQ the system checks for all invoices with a block if the total quantity invoiced is less or equal to the total quantity received. So the system does not check only the quantity of the invoice with a block.
If you change the limit of tolerance limit DQ to 5000 euro to many invoices will be released, also invoices that should keep a block.
For example:
quantity received: 3
quantity invoiced: 3+3= 6.(both invoices had a block, because DQ absolute limit was zero).
After raising the limit to 5000 euro, both invoices were released, which is wrong!
It is logical that DQ should have a low limit. SAP only tries to relase the invoices with block. There also can be invoices without block.
For example:
quantity received: 3 - 3 + 3 = 3
quantity invoiced: 3 (block)
          +3 (no block)= 6.
The invoice with block should not be released. SAP only knows this when SAP does a check of the total quantity invoiced and received.

Report for asset: invoice posted by vendor

Hello Gurus,
My users want to have a report to extract the list of vendor invoices posted on assets. But I am Not able to find any such kind of table relationship in which Asset details & vendor Details both are maintained.
While creation of Asset They didn't maintained the vendor details. So the Vendor details are not available in Asset Master Tables .
So please if you people can help me out.

Hi
Can you please specify the report name.
regards
Navin

Problem in AP Invoice Posting

Hi Gurus,
We had a problem in invoice posting to the Vendor. Some invoices posted correctly and paid but few have corrections and those to be posted manually. Usually the Posting happens by Batchjob in Autosys stream.
My questions are
Can we delete the Batchjob to post the invoices manually?
What will be the problems if I delete the batchjob which was already scheduled by Autosys? This is to post some of the invoices manually which was not posted in earlier job.
Kindly advice how to proceed and early response will be
appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
JBC

The first thing you need to check is if you have the double invoice checking function.
If you have, you remove some of the risk.
If posting the invoices manually is easier than via an automated route, you should question why they are being automated in the first place.
Normally this is done to save time, and process volume, so 1000 invoices a day kind of thing.
Are all your invoices Finance invoices or do they come from MM?
If they come from MM you will need to make sure you use MIRO to enter the invoice so the PO is updated, otherwise you can use FB60.
Hope this helps, award points if useful.

Single Excise Invoice Posting against multiple Goods Receipt.

Hi,
We made a Purchase Order, say 4500000753, of 100 Qty,
The Vendor sent us the Material in two different Challans but in same date and two created two Material Documents,say 5000000772 & 5000000773 for Goods Receipt.
The Vendor sent us single Excise Invoice for both the Challans (goods receipt). Please advise how to post the Excise Invoice.
We tried to capture Invoice against Purchase Order, but the system is giving the following message:
Document 4500000753 does not contain any selectable items
My Queries / doublts
1. Is it possible to post excise document against multiple goods receipt documents.
2. In what case we excise posting against Purchase Order and what is configuration required.
3. Can we post excise invoice with two different Invoice Numbers like 123-A & 123-B
Please guide.
Regards,

Hi Jeyakanthan,
Thanks for the reply.
I have gone thru the "Multiple Goods Receipts for a Single Excise Invoice " in Sap Help Documentation, what I have understood is that we can do multiple Goods Receipt against a Single Invoice. Here in this case we do the Goods Receipt against Purchase Order , do the Invoice Capture for first goods receipt againts Purchase Order and we enter the Invoice Number (say 745, sent by the Vendor) while capturing excise invoice. When the second shipment (against the same PO) comes, we do goods receipt and we refer the "Only Refer Excise Invoice" while doing the goods receipt. Finally after when we have entered all the shipments for the PO, we do the Excise Posting.
Here in our case we have already posted the Goods Receipt (without entering the Invoice Number in first goods receipt) and now we want to capture & post excise invoice for a Single Excise Invoice (Invoice No. say 745,).
Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.
Here we have got two options:
a. Reverse all the goods receipt & re-enter the goods receipt .
b. post two separate excise invoice against each goods receipt mentioning dummy excise invoice number like 745-A & 745-B.
Option a seems difficulty as we will have to reverse all the subsequent goods receipt & transfer posting documents.
Option b seems legally wrong, as per understanding.
Request you to please advise.
Regards
PK

PO based Invoice posting

Hi ,
How do I do PO based invoice posting . I have always done GR based Invoice verification . But I have a scenario where the vendor wants to do invoice before GRN . So I guess we will have to do PO based invoice verification.
Regards
Nandini

Hi
You can do the Invoicing with reference to PO just like any other Invoicing, the difference in your case is you will get empty line items in MIRO screen since you have not done any Goods receipt. In Import PO scenario we carry out similar payment clearences for all kinds of taxes. So there is nothing psecial yo have to do , only thing you need to take care is that you do not have the Gr-Bsd IV indicator activated.
Regards

Invoice posting possible for limit PO although final invoice is set

Hi,
I encountered a strange behavior, I think.
I created a limit PO and posted several invoices against it. So far, so good.
Then, I wanted to "close" the limit PO and set the "Final invoice" indicator in PO. Even though, I was able to post further invoices against this PO. Shouldn't this be prevented?
I used the workaround to modify the PO and change the expected value to the actual value of invoices posted against the PO... But why does final invoice flag have no effect at all? Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!

Hi,
The purpose of final invoice indicator is to reset the purchase order commitments. The final invoice indicator does not prevent further invoices from being posted. Please see F1 help documentation on this field.
You can block the item if further processing is required.
Kind Regards,
Suneet

F-28 incoming Invoice Posting Discount Splitting

Hi All,
I am using BDC for F-28 T Code to post incoming Invoice posting
but the issue is while posting the discount amount if i send 60 Rs through file it is splitting into 30 and 30
Not exactly 50-50
I am unable to get on what basis the amount is splitting.
I hvae to asssign Cost and Profit Center to the Discount amount .
But how many parts the Dicount amount is splitting is th issue.
Pls Help Me.
regards
Venu Madhav

pls. send u r code if possible..
Thanks,
Mahesh Kumar.

Invoice posting is not triggering idoc message in EBP to FI backned ECC6

Hi ,
We are working on classic scenario with SRM 5 having EBP and SUS on separate clients on same srm system.
Now we are extending standlone scenario for selected product categories .
We have created product master ,product category & vendor master in SRM EBP client. Defined below settings
1.Define Sourcing for Product Categories -local
2.Define Objects in Backend System -EBP of type Local
3.Define G/L Account for Product Category and Account Assignmet
We are able to create Shpping cart ->purchase order( local)->confirm goods & invoice for local product
With central ccountant authorization employee user has created the invoice and resulted status of invoice as
"Currently Being Transferred" , expected   to post the invoice in ECC system but after invoice idoc is not getting generated in SRM in order to transferred to backend ?
I have tried and in debug mode found that ,Logical System of Logistics Backend is wrongly
attached to invoice ie instead of ECC logical system it is appearing SRM Local logical system . After changing the
backend value for invoice header -BE_LOG_SYSTEM from srm to ecc backend & executed
FM-BBP_PROCDOC_TRANSFER for particular invoice ,Idoc Basic type        BBPIV01 is generated and passed to ecc.
But not able to identify why wrong "Logistic backend " is appeared in invoice. we have below attributes maintained in
Employee
Accounting System for Vendor     VENDOR_ACS     DSRCLNT254(SRM local)
Company Code                                         BUK     100
Cost Center                                                               CNT     430900
System Alias                                                         SYS     LOGSYS250
System Alias for Accounting Systems                   ACS     DSRCLNT254
System Alias for Vendor                                      VENDOR_SYS     LOGSYS250
Vendor
Accounting System for Vendor     VENDOR_ACS     LOGSYS250(ECC)
Company Code                           BUK                            100
System Alias for Vendor                      VENDOR_SYS                            LOGSYS250(ECC)
Kindly help me to post the invoice to ECC backend ,

Thanks Sheetal,
We have classic scenario in place so ECC system (LOGSYS250 ) is defined as backend system of type- ERP_2.0   &
FIvalid- realtime backend validation .
We are using ECC is the accounting system defined in the configuration setting Define Backend Systems.
Note: More to add that Invocie idoc generated after backend logical system correction in invoice header data of SRM ,
it is posting invoice successfully in eCC backend . So data correction for logical system value is seems some problem with standlone scenario configuration .
We have validating this scenario for selectd product categories as with SRM 5 version in place, customer is intrested to use Invoice management system ie.   invoice should be validated with exceptions in SRM before posting to ECC.
We have EBP & SUS in different client on SRM system ,so in existing classical scenario   invoices created in SUS against ECC backned purchase orders is not flowing to IMS in EBP . Can you help me to validate the scenario ?
Regards,
Santosh
Edited by: Patil Santosh D on Oct 2, 2009 1:51 PM
Edited by: Patil Santosh D on Oct 5, 2009 11:37 AM
Edited by: Patil Santosh D on Oct 9, 2009 7:38 AM.
Issue is resolved . It is the System Alias for Accounting Systems setting in organization module .
Now with completion of workflow idoc message-BBPIV is generated in SRM and successfully posting in ECC.
Thanks a lot for your inputs .

Mistakenly reversed goods receipt after invoice posted

Hi experts,
I already post this question in EAM forum, but moved to here as I think I will get more useful replies.
I have a PO that was goods receipted and invoiced receipted. Later on, the GR was reversed, and now that entry needs to be reverse... We're having a negative value in our reports that should not be there.
What would be the way to fix this? Is it OK that the goods receipted may be reversed after invoice receipted.. i.e. after an invoice has been posted? In Tx. OMBZ the Mvt. 102 has "RevGR desp. IR" unchecked.
Kind Regards,
Andres.
Original thread: Reverse goods receipt after invoice posted.

Just do a GR again for the PO and this should fix your problem. The original document and reversal documents will remain there with another GR document against PO.
Unless the payment against the invoice hasnt been made, your preceding documents can be changed. Once the payment has been made, you should not be able to change any preceding document.
Edited by: Afshad Irani on May 31, 2010 9:08 AM

Problem with invoice posting

Hi .. i,m facing an issue with intercompany Invoice posting .
I'm having delivery note as a reference to that invoice but im getting error message that delivery note doesnot exist..
i have entered correct delivery note..
how this can b overcome?
Thanks and regards..
Manoj

hi,
for having del. note as ref in MIRO, first you must have entered the same del. note while making GR (MIGO), then only that is possible.
Have you done that,
other wise PO ref is the best & will work anyway
Regards
AK

SRM 7.0 Invoice posting issues, validation

Hi Experts ,
We are configuring SRM7.0 with ECC6 ( Ehp4) having Classic Scenario .
1. In Std SRM , we can post Invoice both ways
With ref to PO
W/o ref to PO.
We don't want to post Invoice w/o refernce to PO. How it can be stoped ? I want system should even, not allow user to post invoice w/o ref to PO ( Should give error).
2. We had NOT actiacted "Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Account" in ECC Invoice Config. But in SRM, If we post any invoice w.r.t. PO and add some extra line item, than system do not Stop me , and just give message that "Invoice 80000000112 is created, but not forwarded to Accounting " and its ststus shows "Waiting from preceeding document".
How it can be stoped ? I want system should even, not allow user to post invoice w/o ref to PO ( Should give error)?
3. We are using GR based IV in PO.
If for any PO , GR is not done
User tried to post the invoice in SRM, system gives error message that "Precessing document req for invoice is not availble", but if I POST it , system proceeds it with green color message "Invoice 80000000113 is created, but not forwarded to Accounting " and its status shows "Waiting from preceeding document"
If PO Qty = 100, GR= 20, IR =100 Qty
System 1st give error Message
Line 1 : Qty too high ( Tol Limit of 0.00 AUD exceeded)
Line 1 : Value too high ( Tol Limit of 0.00 AUD exceeded)
And after that if user POST it, then system just do not Stop me , and just give message that "Invoice 80000000057 is created, but not forwarded to Accounting " and its status shows "To be Corrected Manually". How this can be stopped ?
I believe , by using DOC check or ITEM Check BADi this can be done , Can anyone suggest there is another way ?
Thanks
NAP

Thanks Ranjan,
1. No there is no any Portal Link for Invoice w/o PO. In the Portal for SRM BP, same single link displays from which we can post both Invoice w.ref to PO and w/o PO.
2. Since we do not want user to make mistake. System should stop him and do not allow if PO is not refered or IR Qty > GR Qty.
Do anyone have any inputs.
Thanks
NAP

Invoice Posting problem in Framework Purchase Order

Hi folks!!
I am trying to post invoice for framework order, but information in PO reference tab is appearing as grey so I cannot enter amount or G/L account there. how can I make this tab writable.
Best regards,

Hello Qamar
The problem may be that there is missing customizing for account assi. category 'U' in SPRO. In order to enter account assignment at MIRO you need to set indicator 'AA changeable at IR' (V_T163K-REUPD).
Check that !
Good luck!
Plauto

Invoice Posting: Quantity full but amout partially

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for