Invoice verification For Freight  before GR in  Scheduling agreement

I have one doubt like can we post the Planned delivery cost against the Scheduling Agreement just like Import Purchases with checking off the GR Based IV Indicator before doing the GR
I tried it but its giving me that no delivery costs are Planned in the Scheduling agreements it runs fine in case of the PO because PO is a time independent Agreement , Please
Let me know how to achieve the same in case of the scheduling agreements.
Appreciate if you can suggest something in this case Urgently .

HI Deep
I am facing exactly the similar issue. Experts please suggest.
Deep! If you already have an answer? Please disclose the same.
Regards
Arvind

Similar Messages

  • Invoice Verification for Import PO

    Dear Friends,
    We are going live. We are uploading data. For certain Imports, For 10000 Kgs, Import Duties has been paid in february, Out of which, 5000 kgs has been received. For Remaining 5000kgs GRN is pending. So we are creating PO for 5000 Kgs. For these, Invoice verification for custom duties is required for reference during MIGO. So how to create this invoice. What way we have to do this? Please suggest...
    Regards,
    Sridhar

    do MIRO for customs before going for Goods receipt.
    enter PO number no and select  "planned delivery goods" and enter other details and post the document
    go to J1IEX and capture the details ,, go migo and again go to J1IEX and post the document

  • Customs Invoice Verification for Partial Qty

    Dear All,
    I want to do invoice verification for partial quantity of p.o. only in miro for customs vendor. How can the amount will automatically comes in miro screen if i give partial quantity received in that. Suggest me
    Thanks & Regards,
    Radhika

    Hi BSA,
    Fistly FYI.
    Goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification must be defined in the purchase order.
    In goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification, each goods receipt is settled separately.
    Goods receipts and invoices are matched up in the purchase order history.
    In goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification, it is not possible to post an invoice before the first goods receipt.
    In goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification, the invoice quantity should not be greater than the actual delivered quantity. However, it is possible to post a larger invoice amount. You cannot “reassign” invoices from one goods receipt to another.
    When purchase-order-based Invoice Verification has been defined, all items in the purchase order are presented on the selection screen or in the item list.
    The suggested quantity is the difference between the total delivered quantity and the total invoice quantity.
    When you enter an invoice using the delivery note number or goods receipt document number, the system looks for the corresponding purchase order item and then proceeds in the same way as when you enter an invoice using the purchase order number.
    If there are several goods receipts and invoices for a purchase order item, the purchase order history does not tell you which invoice came from which vendor.        
    For your case it needed to do a MIRO by one GR of one PO.
    And in MIRO you can list items by GRs for a PO with GR-based IV.  It is true. You did two GRs for one PO then you should have two lines in MIRO, I am sure. Please check more after having a rest.
    Regars,
    Bruce

  • Same nr range in Logistics Invoice Verification for the MM and FI document

    I customised Logistics Invoce verification (on ECC6) with the same nr range for MM and FI.  That were done by changing the nr range of doc type RE (in FI) to nr range 52 andcreated the nr range for the company code for fiscal year 2007 and 2008 (our fiscal year 2008 start 1.10.07) and made it external nr assignment.  In MM I changed RD and RS to a new range 05 to which I assigned the nr range 5200000000 to 5299999999 (internally assigned).  For the vendor consignment I created a new document type and assign that to nr range 51 (as the original invoice verification settings).
    This process works quite nice with the same document nr for MM and FI, however I still do have a problem. (I work through the article on above as per FI Expert issue of Sept 07, but even in there my problem was not mentioned.
    If I do an invoice verification for previous period with price changes on the system, Sap want to post 2 accounting docs (1 for the previous month - on which I did have stock and 1 for current month - one which I did not have any stock).  The system only send 1 document nr for FI who needs 2 doc nrs.  I now get the error  message that I must use a document in the nr range 5200000000 and 529999999.
    How do I rectify this or can I not use this functionality if we allow backdating to the previous period
    Regards
    Anna-Marie Robson

    I customised Logistics Invoce verification (on ECC6) with the same nr range for MM and FI.  That were done by changing the nr range of doc type RE (in FI) to nr range 52 andcreated the nr range for the company code for fiscal year 2007 and 2008 (our fiscal year 2008 start 1.10.07) and made it external nr assignment.  In MM I changed RD and RS to a new range 05 to which I assigned the nr range 5200000000 to 5299999999 (internally assigned).  For the vendor consignment I created a new document type and assign that to nr range 51 (as the original invoice verification settings).
    This process works quite nice with the same document nr for MM and FI, however I still do have a problem. (I work through the article on above as per FI Expert issue of Sept 07, but even in there my problem was not mentioned.
    If I do an invoice verification for previous period with price changes on the system, Sap want to post 2 accounting docs (1 for the previous month - on which I did have stock and 1 for current month - one which I did not have any stock).  The system only send 1 document nr for FI who needs 2 doc nrs.  I now get the error  message that I must use a document in the nr range 5200000000 and 529999999.
    How do I rectify this or can I not use this functionality if we allow backdating to the previous period
    Regards
    Anna-Marie Robson

  • Invoice Verification for IMPORT PO(ASSET)

    Hi All,
    User has created Purchase order against Import Material for asset with Account Assignment category as A.While invoice verification for basic customs duty,ECS and HSES, system debiting the GL account for Asset instead of CenVat clearing.
    In case of PO against import material for asset with out account assignment category as A, system debiting the cenvat clearing account accurately.
    Current Accounting Entry
    Commissioner Of Customs Credit
    Asset under construction(CWIP) Debit
    Required Account Entry
    Commissioner Of Customs Credit
    Cenval Clearing - Debit
    Customs deposit a/c - Debit
    It is bit urgent.Please provide the solution.
    Santosh

    Hi,
    Go to SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Account Assignment > Maintain Account Assignment Categories > Here for "A", remove "GR Non-Valuated" indicator and then try.
    If it is not working for old PO then create new PO and then try.

  • Accounting Entries when Invoice Verification takes place before GR

    Hello All,
    I have some difficulty in understanding the accounting entries when Invoice Verification takes place before Goods Receipt.
    The scenario is as below: - (It is taken from one of the SAP documentation - AC530 - Actual Costing & Material Ledger- pg.No.2-8)
    1) Stock of material available u2013 50 units / Value Rs.125 /Moving average price in the material master Rs.2.50 per unit
    2) Invoice receipt takes place before goods receipt u2013 100 pc @ Rs.4.00 pc
    3) System does internal stock coverage check. As per SAP document, the stock shortage is 50 pieces.
    4) So the price difference arise i.e.Rs.100 (How this amount is arrived at? u2013 Not understood)
    5) The price difference of Rs.100 is only partially debited to the material (Rs.50). The rest is posted to price difference account (Rs.50)
    The accounting entry u2013
    GRIR A/c Dr                      300
    Inventory A/c Dr.                 50
    Price Diff. A/c Dr.                50
    To Vendor A/c                   400
    Question u2013
    -     I have not understood how Rs.100 is calculated & on what Moving average price the calculation takes place.
    -     As per the calculation in the document, the moving average price of the opening stock is Rs.2.50.the stock is 50  units. (50*2.50=125)
    -     The Invoice receipt happens at 100 pcs @ Rs.4.00 (100*4=400)
    -     So the new moving average price will be Rs.3.50 (Rs.125 + {100*4=400})=Rs.525. Rs.525/(100+50)pcs = Rs.3.50
    -     So how the price difference & posting to Stock account is calculated in the accounting entry?
    Please help,
    Thanks & Regards,
    Gov

    Hi,
    Check below mentioned thread to understand posting to price difference account..
    Logic of price difference  posting
    you missed one aspect of this and that is PO qty and PO price.
    GR/IR will get debit at IR Qty * PO Price.
    rest all calculations are in the link provided..
    - So the new moving average price will be Rs.3.50 (Rs.125 + {100*4=400})=Rs.525. Rs.525/(100+50)pcs = Rs.3.50
    Moving avg. will be calculated on stock value / qty in stock. new MAP will be stock value = (125 +50) = 175 and stock qty = 50 units so MAP will be 175/50 = 3.5.
    Since, GRN has not been done yet stock value (100*4) will not be there..
    Regards,
    Sayujya

  • Invoice verification for services

    Hi Friends,
                 this is chandra shekar,  can any one tell me how to do invoice verification for services.
    regards
    chandra shekar

    Dear,
    An invoice for a service can refer to a service entry sheet.
    The services actually performed (work actually done) by a service vendor is recorded in a Service Entry Sheet with reference to the purchase order.
    Access the activity choosing the Transaction code, ML81 or ML81N Maintain Entry Sheet.
    On the Initial Screen, choose "Other Purchase Orders" icon and click this, the system will pop up a new screen.
    In this screen in the Purchase Order field give the reference purchase order number and choose [Enter] to continue.
    You will get a new Service Entry for this Purchase Order number.
    Here, on this screen, choose "Create Entry Sheet" (a white paper icon.)
    System allocates a service entry sheet number internally, and you will get the number on your screen.
    On the "xxxxxxxxxx Create Entry Sheet" screen, maintain the desired entries under appropriate fields:
    Choose Service selection icon at the bottom of the screen to adopt the data.
    The system will give you a pop up screen with the purchase order number on that; Choose [Enter] to continue.
    The system will give you a new screen Select Services since Reference the services list from purchase order is displayed here.
    Choose the line item and choose on Services icon on top of screen.
    You can observe the system copied the service line item from purchase order with open item quantity.
    Change the quantity per your requirements.
    With this the basic information for the service entry sheet is fully completed. As to the requirements, you can fill other fields also if required.
    To accept the service, choose the "Accept" icon or [Control] + [F1] (Green flag icon).
    You can see the traffic light has turned yellow in color. This means it is ready to save the service entry sheet.
    Choose Save.
    The color signal for the status display switches from yellow to green.
    If you want a detailed steps with screenshots, please visit: https://ocps.net/fa/om/Documents/Toolroom%20Assistant/ML81N_Creating_An_Entry_Sheet_03-29-2007.doc
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

  • MIRO invoice verification for Service entry sheet

    When trying to do invoice verification for Service entry sheet i am getting this below error pls guide me
    Delivery note/service entry sheet 5000000150  does not exist
    Message no. M8183

    Hi,
    You may be saves SES number and now SES is not released!
    1st Just cross check PO history TAB of service PO(ME23N), did you have only service entry sheet number or you have service entry sheet number and material document( will be created after releasing SES) with 101 movement type.
    You have created service entry sheet (SES) in ML81N and got SES number, so as to recognize the vendor performed service. Next step, you need to accept service by releasing SES( in ML81N by clicking green flag or if release strategy there for SES, you need to release SES in ML85) so that  FI document will be created.
    Once SES released, then you can do MIRO w.r.t SES only.
    Check doc:
    http://help.sap.com/bp_bl604/BBLibrary/Documentation/209_BPP_EN_FI.doc
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Invoice verification for blanket PO with account assignment category U (un

    Hi all
    While doing miro when i am doing invoice verification for blanket PO with account assignment category U (unknown) system is not allowing me to enter the GL it is disable,wat can be the possible reason
    Regards
    shailesh

    Hi Shailesh,
    As you have maintained the account assignment category as U the account assignment tab will not be available. If you want to enter a GL account then use the Account assignments K or F or X.
    Else if you want to use U in PO then you can give the GL account and other account assignment details only in the Invoice verification.
    Regards,
    Kathir

  • While doing invoice verification, for fright value tax code not appearing

    Hi All,
    While doing invoice verification for PO which is having fright conditon, system is not displaying tax code in invoice.
    Every time user has to select manually in the invoive verification.
    Is there is any config missing for that fright condition?
    Thanks in Advance.
    Anil

    Hi
    If you wish to default the tax code for the planned delivery costs this                                         
    must be obtained from an independent source which is OMR2.                                                      
    With OMR2 it is possible to default the tax in the delivery cost                                                
    line + header tax. It is not possible to default only in the delivery                                           
    cost line. The header tax needs to be changed manually to support the                                           
    different tax codes in the item lines.                                                                          
    Best regards
    Erika

  • Invoice Verification for Capital PO with Vendor (alternate Payee)

    Hi all,
    I want to do Invoice verification for capital PO where the payment to the vendor A is made by  vendor B ( Alternate payer).
    I have created new partner role and given Vendor B as Alternate Payer in PO.
    PR, PO with Account Assignment category "A". GR done.
    My question is : I need to do Invoice Verification.
    Option A :verify the Invoice of Vendor A.
    Option B : verify in Hardcopy and hand over it to Vendor B for making immediate payment.  Since I need to pay Vendor B,  I planned to change the name of the vendor in Detail tab as Vendor B. In this way, my payment processing is being done for Vendor B.
    Please let me know which option is right. Please suggest if there are other ways of doing this.
    Since Vendor B will take the Asset and lease it to me and will make the payment to Vendor A immediately. I want to pay Vendor B in installments.
    Due to some technical reasons, I am not able to do MIRO ( It says short dump).
    Hence, I am not able to try successfully in Dev server.
    regards
    Partha

    > About your short dump contact your system admin.
    >
    > About your process if you are leasing the equipment
    > then it's better to use service order.
    > Other wise what evet you have suggetsed is the
    > solution looks to me by looking your esplanation.
    Hi Mr.Patel
    What is the process that you suggest by Service Order.
    Is it possible to explain in detail please for the benefit of the forum and for me.
    Partha

  • Invoice verification for GR  with out po(501)

    how to make invoice verification for matl with GR with out PO

    Hi,
    501 Movement is meant for GR w/o referencing PO.
    There will not be any GR/IR clrng account generated in this GR.
    So you can not refer this for Invoice Posting.
    Alternatively, in MIRO Transaction, you can have the option of Posting the amount to different G/L account or Material Account. With this you can post the Invoice in the SAP System
    You have to use either of following transactions for Vendor Bill booking;
    FB60 - Invoice OR
    F-43 - Invoice - General
    And Use F-53 - Post Payment after Vendor Bill Booking..
    Kuber

  • Manual invoice verification for cross  company sales

    Hi
    I am doings sales from ordering company code with supllying compnay code plant.
    and i am doing intercompany billing.
    ex: code 7000(ordering cocd)
          sls org 7000(ordering sls org)
    plant 7000
       cocd 2000
    sls org 2000
    plant 2000
    the sales order is created for sls org 7000 with delivering plant 2000 for cross company sales.
    customer invoice is done
    intercompany invoice is done.
    here how to do manual invoice verification for intercompany billing for cocd 7000.
    what is ref filed in miro.
    regards
    Ramachandra

    Hi
        Yes it is possible.For this you have to maintain  company code clearing accounts in OBYA( i.e. say for example if you have two company codes, company code A & Company code B.you maintain clearing accounts for this two company codes.
    go to obya
    enter your company codes and  select.
    You enter a debit posting key and account debit for company code 1
    similarly you enter a credit posting key and account credit for company code 1
    repeat the same for the company code 2 and save it.
    After that you procure for company code A and do GR for the same.
    Now the system will allow you to post the Invoice.
    Thanks & Regards
    SRI.

  • BAPI for fetching the list of scheduling agreements

    This is my first post in SDN Forums so pardon me if I commit a mistake.
    My question is: Is there a standard BAPI for fetching a list of scheduling agreements?
    I know that there are BAPIs for creating and maintaining scheduling agreements like BAPI_SAG_CREATE and BAPI_SAG_CHANGE and iBAPI_SAG_GETDETAIL but each of these require the scheduling agreement number. My requirement is to list out all the scheduling agreements that are present in the system.
    I found a BAPI named BAPI_DOCUMENT_GETLIST and BAPI_DOCUMENT_GETLIST2 but I'm not able to find out what documents it is able to display. If I don't specify any selection criteria, it is fetching just two records of document type DRW. No other document of any other type is fetched.
    Another BAPI that I found was BAPI_SALESORDER_GETLIST in which if I specify the Transaction group as "3" (for scheduling agreement), it fetches them but those are related to Sales orders and not purchase orders.
    So, if anyone has any info and can help me out, I would really appreciate it.
    Edited by: rkarthea on Jul 30, 2010 10:44 AM

    Hi Raj,
    As I had said earlier, I need the Scheduling agreements related to purchase orders and not sales orders. The ones in EKKO table (Doc category: L).Will this program fetch this info?
    Also, I need a Java app (that's being developed) to fetch this info, so I'm looking for a BAPI. Is there any or can this program (if it fetches the right Scheduling agreements) be called from an external Java app?

  • Invoice Verification for Conditions, e.g. Freight Delivery Cost

    PO was created with conditions, i.e. freight.
    Example:  100 items & 2 USD = 200 USD (Main Product)
    + Freight                                     50
    Total Cost                                  250
    Goods are receipted as follows:
    1) Main Product 10 items @ 2 USD = 20
        Freight 10/100*50                           5
        Total GR Accrual                          25                                    
    2) Main Product 20 items @ 2 USD = 40
        Freight 20/100*50                          10
        Total GR Accrual                          50
    Upon Invoice Verfiication (MIRO), following are the results.
    Main Product
    Item 10 @ 2 = 20 
    Item 20 @ 2 =40
    MIRO booking for main product is itemized. This is correct.
    However for freight,
    Freight
    Item 30 @ 2 = 60
    MIRO booking for Freight is sum-up instead of being itemised. Is this a SAP standard funtionality. We prefer an itemised booking of freight also.
    Appreciate your reply.
    Thanks
    Robert

    HI,
    The system sums up the planned delivery costs at MIRO stage.
    I would guess that you are using the "GR based IV" flag on the PO and that is why you are getting a line per GR for the actual items themselves. But this flag does not affect the delivery cost conditions and so I am sorry but they will always be a total rather than separate lines.
    This is not ideal fro your situation but that is the way it works and to change this would be a MAJOR modification and definitely NOT worth the effort and risk.
    Steve B

Maybe you are looking for