Invoice verification (MIRO) filed selection

Hi Experts,
Could please explain, where we can invoice verification MIRO field selection.
I want to change invoice party field selection which in the MIRO header - Details tab from display mode to change mode.
My requirement is to change invoice party in the MIRO screen other than the PO vendor.
Could you explain, where these settings are exist in the configuration?
How we can make invoice party field selection from display mode to change mode?
Could you explain ASAP.
Regards
KRK

Hi,
Go to: IMG->MM->LIV->Incoming Invoice
Enter these details and make Inv. Party as you want
Transaction          MIRO
Screen variant       0001_000_0150
Program              SAPLFDCB
Screen               150
Hope this helps!
Reetesh

Similar Messages

  • Field Selection for - Invoice Verification (MIRO)

    Dear Experts,
    Can anybody please explain how make Field selection for INVOICE VERIFICATION (MIRO).
    I want BUSINESS AREA field mandatory in MIRO.
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi,
    Business area is linked to other organizational units (plant, division,
    distribution chanel, cost center). It can be defined using assigments
    (e. cost centers to the business area) or combinations of information
    (like plant and division determination).
    It is usually derived from the account assignments of the cost items
    and inherited from there into the vendor line item.
    For MIRO,to automatically fill the business area it must be able to
    uniquely identify a business area.
    This means that for multiple materials each one must have the same
    business area for IV to fill the vendor line item.
    This is the way the system is designed.
    The business area can be set as 'optional' field and is not 'mandatory'
    by design.It can be customised according to the individual needs.
    Please check the field status in tr OB41/OB14 and  OB23 for the vendor.
    Best Regards,
    Arminda Jack

  • User exit during invoice verification (MIRO) and PO creation

    Hi,
        I have a following scenario to be support by ABAP development
    1. During invoice verification (MIRO) system should allow users to manually make any changes in amount and qty proposed by system.
    2. During purchase order creation i need a warning message in case of this po is first creating for that particular article and vendor combination.
       so that user will get alerted in case of wrongly choosen the vendor.Many a times user create wrong po, wrong GR and wrong invoice.
      since the business process activities are decentralized, person who is making GR is differ from the peron who had created po and invoice.
    Ex: material DCF is supplying by vendor VLC international, where there is one more vendor name with VLC traders. due to this name some time users will prepare wrong po, wrong GR and wrong invoice.
       plz suggest how can i suggest my  ABAPER to control this mistakes.

    Hi,
    you can check out the following exits while PO creation:
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_006
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_007
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_008
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_009
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_012
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_013
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_014
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_016
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_017
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_018
    Thanks.

  • Same nr range in Invoice Verification (MIRO) and FI document

    Dear all can you please help to solve this issue?
    We would like to have the same number range for invoice verification and for financial document, what we have to do?
    Regards
    Marco

    Please follow the steps as below
    Step 1. Maintain FI document number range. Use transaction OMR4 and go to Number range for document types in FI. Select the company code for which you want to create the new number range interval and click on the change interval button. Insert a new document number range by clicking on the insert interval button on top of the screen.for example, I created number range interval 52 with the document numbers 5200000000 – 5299999999. Don't forget to set the external number range check box (Ext).
    Step 2. Assign FI number range to FI document types. The second step is to assign the number range created in step 1 to the FI document type for invoices. Again use transaction OMR4 and go to Document type. Double-click on the document type, which you are using for LIV invoices. In my example, I used the SAP standard document type RE. In the number range field, assign the new number range interval 52
    Step 3. Maintain MM document number ranges. Use transaction OMRJ and click on change interval button. Insert a new document number range by clicking on the insert button at the top of the screen. For MM documents, I created number range interval 52 with the document numbers 5200000000 – 5299999999. For the internal number range assignment, do not set the external number range check box (Ext).
    Step 4. Update MM number range assignment. The last step is to assign the MM number range to your MM transaction via IMG menu path Materials Management>Logistics Invoice Verification>Incoming Invoice>Number Assignment>Maintain Number Assignments for Logistic Documents>Transaction – Assign Number ranges. Two transactions are available. LIV contains the following two internal transactions that are used for the MM document number determination:
    RD: manual invoice entry (MIRO)
    RS: cancel, reverse invoice (MR8M), evaluated receipt settlement (MRRL), EDI invoice receipt, invoicing plan (MRIS), and revaluation (MRNB).
    You need to update the number range interval for transaction RD.
    hope now that things r clear
    reward accordingly

  • Invoice Verification MIRO

    Dear All,
    This is about invoice verification block after MIRO posting-
    In PO we have set it as 2 way match, once the PO is equal to Invoice verification then the system should not put any payment block. But if it doesnt match the value of PO to IV then the system should put invoice verifcation block (R) in the accounting document.
    Here, whatever we post that is whether the PO value is matching or not the invoice verification block (R) is appearing in the accounting document. Does any one gone through similar issue....
    I want to know how this can happen?
    Checked validations but nothing that sort appears.....is there a way to find out how this happens....
    Thanks to all in advance.

    Hello
    I do not know of any BAPI. But you can set an automatic block up through your payment terms.
    Check the following customizing path for this:
    Financial Accounting
    ->Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable
       ->Business Transactions
         ->Incoming Invoices/Credit Memos
           ->Maintain Terms of Payment
    Select the details for the payment term and check for the indicator there to set the default block key.
    Hope this helps
    Ray

  • Invoice verification(MIRO) for consignment

    Dear ALL,
    I have two questions about invoice verification.
    1.Now we create PO for consignment material. For consignment material, we use MRKO to settle the GI and generate the AP. However, when we do IV via MIRO by selecting vendor, some consignment PO GR records also pop up. Can we hide those POs during invoice verification?
    2.For some PO which IV is done, we can also display some blank items in MIRO, can we hids those items also?
    Thanks,
    Gary

    Hi, all
    Does anybody can answer my questions?
    Thanks in advance,
    Gary

  • Invoice Verification (MIRO) allocation via Delivery note

    We are in 5.00 version
    In our system the same Delivery note number could be associated not only to different vendor, but even to the same vendor in different years.
    In the last case the system allocate ALL the Delivery notes.
    I try to use the F4 function to limit the selection, using filter on vendor and document date, but after the again all the delivery note for the selected vendor are allocate.
    Could anybody help me on this.
    thanks
    Claudio

    In our organisation we are doing MIRO with reference to Delivery note. As same number of delivery note is being submiited by multiple vendors, after entry of that delivery note in MIRO system shows large list (Closed & Open for MIRO). This becomes difficult to select the required delivery note.
    Is it possible to make display of only those delivery notes against which MIRO (Invoice verification has not done).
    Also MIRO with reference to GRN number is possible or not ?
    HI,
    To avoid difficulties post miro with Reference document (PO Reference Tab) - Delivery note click on Radio button a possible entries for delivery note screen will appear. Here you can search specific delivery note by a lot of criteria which will save ur time and effort also you can see MIGO Document.  Click and put tick to adopt and post Delivery note / migo and enter required field.

  • RE.Can We do (MIGO) Batch No based Logistics Invoice Verification(MIRO)

    Dear All
    While doing invoice verification reference to MIGO Doc. we are not able to see Vendor Batch No field in MIRO Screens.
    I.e
    Item No. 10  100No's as per DC/Invoice Received stores were Accepted. But in Production QC Accepted 80 No's 20 Rejected in Batch.625268.
    Batch.625261 = 20No's
    Batch.625268 = 25No's
    Batch.625263 = 25No's
    Batch.625305 = 40No's
    While doing Invoice verification FI do MIRO only for accepted qty. But FI User reduced Qty. in Batch 625263 instead of 625268.
    Because in MIRO screens We are not able to find Vendor Batch Field form MIGO.
    Please advise how to GET Batch Field in MIRO Screen.
    Regards:
    P. Ramana Reddy.

    Hi Anil,
    could you tell me which PO type to be used in such case.
    Secondly it is quite confusing to me.
    In your reply, you had mentioned that you post the inbound delivey document prior to booking the CVD using MIRO. then how you are able to post it again using VL32N (change Inbound delivery Transaction)
    Actually i'm looking for scenario as mentioned below.
    1 Import PO is created with all applicable tax condition
    2 Inbound Delivery is created (using VL31N), but not Posted.
    3 MIRO Invoice is booked for CVD Duties.
       For MIRO Invoicing System Should propose the Qty and Value based on the inbound delivery
    4 then we will do the Good Receipt either from VL32N( by Posting the Inbound Delivery) or from MIGO against Inbound delivery.
    5. Later we will post the Vendor Invoice.
    In Step 3, if i have to book the MIRO (CVD Portion) Manually, then i have no issue in my process.
    Can you through some light on how i can make the system to propose the CVD Value while creating MIRO for custom duties.
    Regards,
    S Anand

  • Invoice verification(MIRO) for blanket purchase order

    Dear All,
    I am tring to enter invoice via. MIRO againest a blanket purchase order. The blanket purchase order is a Frame workorder  with account assignment category 'U' & item category 'B'. I am getting error 'Enter G/L Account'  while entering invoice varification in MIRO.  I am entering the Amount in the 'Acct assgt' column (error mark). However the GL account & cost center field is gray out. System not allow me to enter the GL account & cost center in MIRO. Also I am unable to change the account assignment category from 'U' to 'K'  in MIRO.
    Can some one guide me how to resolve the above problem.
    Your earlier input would be highly appriciated.
    Thanks,
    spsahu

    Hi
    Please check the Variant being used as per the Standard All the fields are in Entry Mode only.
    Please use the Layout  7_6310 All information & Check
    Check in OLMRLIST  the Layout for transaction MIRO & Program SAPLMR1M
    Please ensure that you use Document type FO in Creating Blanket PO's
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • Baseline date calculation in Invoice verification (MIRO)

    Dear experts,
    I need to set baseline date after 40 days from document date in MIRO.
    Baseline date calculation of "Terms of Payment" in IMG has two parameters:
      ・Fixed day
      ・Additional months
    We cannot set 40 days in these parameters.
    Can anybody tell me how to set baseline date not month but date(not fixed day) ?
    Please advise me on the settings SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Master>Define terms of Payment.
    Thanks & Regards
    Ken

    Hi,
    You can't do this.
    The baseline date is the date on which the calculations are made.
    So if you have 40 days to pay, this will be 40 days from the baseline date.
    This will either be the document date or another date, but you can't (in standard SAP) have the baseline date as "X" days after "Y".
    So the baseline date is the date of an event (e.g. the date that the Invoice was posted) not a calculation.
    Is it possible that you have misunderstood the use of this date?
    If you just want to ensure that the payment date is 40 days after invoice recipt, then set you just have to enter the number of days in the payment terms and the baseline date stays as the invoice date (etc.)
    Steve B

  • Invoice Verification (MIRO) posting, showing an error on Tax Code

    Hello
    When i am making MIRO posting it is showing that the specific tax code which i has given is not maintained in the Tax Procedure, but i have checked all the CIN Configurations, Activated the CIN and Tax Procedure is assigned to Country also and rest all is fine,i hav even created the Tax Code but still it is showing that, the TAX CODE is not maintained in Tax Procedure.
    Plz help me out,

    Hi Minhaj,
    Please goto FTXP & check if the tax rates are maintained for the given tax code. If they are maintained then check if accounts are entered by clicking on the acconts tab.
    If you are maintaining Jurisrdiction codes, please ensure that you are entering the correct jurisdiction code for the tax code you have entered.
    Please ensure that you are using the same Tax code & Jurisdiction code in MIRO as is there in MIGO.
    Hope this helps.
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    AVD

  • Tax amount difference in Invoice verification (MIRO) and PO

    Hi Experts,
    I create a PO of say 10000/- and 2% tax so the total po value is 10020/-. It is calculating correctly. But while doing the GR the GR/IR value is less say 8500/- .I don't no the reason it is picking the wrong value.The price control in material master is 'V'. While doing the MIRO the amount is coming 10000 but tax calculation is 25/- instead of 20. What may be the possible reasons for this ? Please help.
    Thanks
    Arun

    Hi Arun
    If ur material has Std price in material master accounting view then that price will get updated in GRN instead f the price in PO thru info record.
    Check that.
    Also is ur tax procedure is TAXINJ or TAXINN.
    In MIRO click on simulate and check what is the G/L that causes extra amount and let us know from which we cn help u better.
    Reg
    Raja

  • Invoice Verification - Tcode MIRO

    Hi, I would like to know if there is anyone who could help me on how to open the G/L field (HKONT) at Details tab in MIRO tcode to enable reconciliation accont changes during an Invoice Verification. In Brazilian Utilities Indutry Sector processes we legaly must have alternative reconciliation accounts for the same vendor.
    I've done a test enabling alternative reconciliation account in FI-GL and it works for the tcode FB60, opening automaticaly the field G/L at the Details tab allowing the user to change the account for an alternative one, but unfortunately for the tcode MIRO it simply doesn't works.
    I hope there is any MM configuration or enhancement which could enable this field.
    Thanks in advance,
    Daniel Damiani
    Business Senior Specialist at CSC

    Hi,
    It is not possible to explicitly change the account at the time an                
    invoice is posted through transaction MIRO, the way it is posible                 
    through FI. In MM, the accounts are automatically determined from the             
    customizing in transaction OMWB, or taken from the purchase order                 
    account assignment data.                                                                               
    You can also have a quick look in tr OMRMB, you will notice that field            
    INVFO-HKONT is not there to be customised.                                                                               
    There is no solution available within the SAP standard system for the             
    change of the reconciliation account for the vendor. Please check note            
    144081 for MIRO/MIR7 functions.                                                                               
    MM invoice verification was developed to finish the external procurement          
    process in logistics and check the invoice data sent by the vendors for           
    correctness (differences) and to post the corresponding accounting                
    document in FI additional.                                                                               
    Creating manually creditor invoices in FI have no relation to a logist            
    process. Therefore not all functions included in FI (FB60) are included           
    in MM invoice verification (MIRO) as well.                                                                               
    You can only change the reconciliation account via vendor master record:          
    Pls. choose "display vendor" in MIRO, than switch to the view accounting          
    information and change there the G/L account. This must be done by                
    every posting procedure and the change must be put back after booking             
    again.                                                                               
    Best regards
    Erika

  • Excise Invoice verification

    Hi
    I read in SAP HELP  like this in country version india on excise inv verification.
    " Entering and Verifying Invoices
    Follow the standard invoice verification procedure, but select Calculate tax on the Vendor Items screen. The system proposes the deductible excise duty items in the invoice document."
    pls tell me where to do this in MIRO.
    regards
    B Shar

    i thnk u are using manual excise value in MM pricing procedure and using tax code or condition records to get the bed ecess and other tax
    hope u have checked in PO that value for all taxes are coming unere invoice tab in ur tax procedure for your PO
    if this is ok then check if u have set condition default in under spro  Maintain Excise Defaults
    and also have done configurast in for ur Classify Condition Types
    do this setting correctlly ur issue will be solved

  • Invoice verification with reference to material document

    Dear Experts;
    i want to make invoice verification (MIRO) with reference to good receipt document not the all quantity in the purchase order. is this possible ???

    Hi,
    Option - 1
    If you have done 3 separate GR's for the above qtys then if you do MIRO with reference to PO then 3 line items will appear with the respective qtys. You select the one you want & delete the rest.
    Option - 2
    Check whether you have entered any values in the delivery note field while doing GR. If yes then do MIRO with reference to Delivery note rather than PO so that qty in the GR material doc will flow to MIRO automatically.
    Thanks & Regards,

Maybe you are looking for

  • Excise Duty wrongly capture in J1iex

    Hi Exports , I am doing STO from Manufacturing Plant to Packing Plant 1) I created STO for 100 Qty 2) Delivery-qty 100 3) Jex- proforma invoice-qty-100-excise value Rs 100, 4) Excise invoice -J1iin- Qty-100 qty.- excise duty Rs 100 But in MIGO I am d

  • External DVI monitor while on battery?

    Most of the time I have my powerbook closed and I use a USB keyboard/mouse and a Dell 21" DVI monitor. I noticed my battery was showing the forever "calculating" and I thought that was strange because the PB is only a couple months old. Well for grin

  • MRO reversal in case of Withholding tax deducted

    Hi experts, We have pass MIRO with deduction of TDS from vendor by mistake and we have issued the check to vendor against same MIRO check was en cashed. we found the mistake after en cashment of check. before MIRO reversal when i try to reset the pay

  • IDoc Message: Invalid Sender Port in FM IDOC_INBOUND_SINGLE

    Hi experts For inbounding IDocs I use the FM IDOC_INBOUND_SINGLE. My problem is, the IDocs always gets the status 56 with error message <Sender port in control record is invalid>. I don't understand the message, because all ports are maintained in WE

  • Multiple HTTP Servers with Portal

    I am trying to set up 9iAS (Portal) on a server that already has several HTTP servers on it. The System Administrator wants a "web services" on a single NT box. I installed 9iAS and that seemed to complete OK but now I'm getting some errors trying to