Invoice verification related

is it possible to do automatic Invoice verification right after GR ??

1) You must maintain the settings in Customizing for purchasing (for example, invoicing plan type, date categories, date descriptions, and date sequence proposals). The related path is IMG ---> Material Management ---> Purchasing ---> Purchase Order ---> Invoicing Plan ......
2) The Purchasing document with FO Document Type (Framework Order) must be used. This document type requires that a validity period be entered in the PO header. This specification is adopted in the invoicing plan, provided that this has been predefined in Customizing for the relevant invoicing plan type.
3) The purchase order item must have an account assignment.
4) The Logistics Invoice Verification must be used.
5) The vendor must have agreed to use the automatic invoice creation facility (since we will use automatic settlement to create the invoice). In this case, the 'AutoEvalGRSetmtDel.' indicator must be flagged in the vendor master record.
Furthermore, once Purchase Order is created with order type FO, ensure that the indicators for GR/IR control have been set correctly on the item detail screen. The Goods Receipt indicator may only be set in combination with the Goods Receipt Non-Valuated indicator. The Invoice indicator must be set. For the automatic creation of invoices, the ERS (Evaluated Receipt Settlement) indicator must be also set. A further prerequisite for automatic settlement is that a tax code must be entered in the purchase order.

Similar Messages

  • Related to Invoice verification system messages

    Hi Experts,
    This is related to invoice verification system messages.
    Client requirement is to configure each system message which are related to logistics invoice verification for almost 1000 user id's.
    Total number of user id's: more than 10,000 in the client instance.
    Ex: Message id 232
         Need to configure message id 232 1000 times, each entry with one user id in the transaction OMRM.
    Similarly, we need to configure almost 500 system messages for the 1000 user id's.
    So, practically it's very difficult to maintain each system message for these many id's.
    If we are keeping user id filed blank, then these message setting will be applicable for the remaining user id's also, for which these messages are not required to display.
    Kindly please advice how to configure this.
    Is it possible to configure these messages at user group id level or any other option.
    Kindly update ASAP.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    KRK

    Hi,
    Ok, I will ask same question in different manner.
    In the OMRM transaction, is it possible to give user group id instead of user id for the respective system message id?
    Ex:
    System message id - User group id instead of user id - Message status
    Could you please confirm, whether it is possible or not
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    KRK

  • Checking Confirmation-Related Invoice verification In Follow-On document

    Hi All,
    I have one requirement where I have to check "Confirmation-Related Invoice verification " checkbox  Inside Follow-On document of Process-Purchase Order when  "Invoice and confirmation" radio button in Limit Item Shopping cart is selected.
    Regards
    Praveen

    Hi Praveen,
    You have to implement the BBP_DOC_ChANGE_BADI for filter type BUS2201 . And put the logic there.Should be very simple for a ABAP er .
    Thanks
    Padhi

  • Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification

    Has anybody had the issue that when using SRM 5.0 (extended classic) a purchase order falls into "error in process" because the Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification has been checked on by SRM even though the vendor master never had this GR based IV indicator check set? Thanks

    Hi
    Is it service ?
    or
    Is it limit cart with confirmation and Invoice ?
    br
    muthu

  • System messages related to Invoice Verification

    Hi Experts,
    Could you please explain when system will issue below four messages during MIRO (Invoice verification) transaction.
    M8   286   Different invoicing party & planned in purchase order & E E
    M8   287   Different invoicing party & planned for del. costs item in PO & E E
    M8   288   Different invoicing party & planned in purchase order & E E
    M8   289   Different invoicing party & planned for del. costs item in PO & E E
    Generally whenever business users are creating invoice with the vendor other than the PO vendor, system will issue these messages.
    But for above mentioned 4 messages, description is almost same. That's why I am confusing. In my case message nos 286 & 288 are very  important.
    I am getting messages no 286 during creation of Invoice with different vendor other than PO vendor.
    So for the remaining 3 messages, I am not able to test business processes.
    Could you please explain when system will issue these messages (other than 286) during MIRO.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    KRK

    Hi,
    As per my knowledge the first 2 (286,287)are standard and other 2 are copied from standard they only change that message numbers.
    Thanking you

  • MRBR- invoice verification block- relation to FI doc

    Hi gurus, please help me in the below issue.
    An invoice was posted using MIRO and due to price variance it is automatically blocked as 'R' for invoice verification.
    And this invoice was waiting to br released from MRBR.
    But, One of our users went into FB02 and changed the payment block on the FI doc (FI doc which originated from posting MIRO)
    and this invoice is also paid now.
    But when we run MRBR the same MIRO invoice is still appearing as blocked, I think there is a disconnect in SAP
    OR
    I didnt configure the system,so that when an invoice is cleared for payment from FI side it should also be synched with MM on a real time basis.
    Is there a OSS note on this, please advise
    Thank You
    MSJ

    Hello,
    Please refer OSS Note 394370 - FAQ: Invoice release - frequently asked questions.
    In this notes, there is an answer for your question. I clarify below.
    In Release 4.0B or 4.5B an incoming invoice was posted with the logistics invoice verification, the invoice was not blocked for payment. After the posting of this incoming invoice, you manually set a payment block in the FI follow-on document, for example by using Transaction 'Change document' (FB02).After the release upgrade to 4.6B or higher and after the run of generation report RM08RBKPBLOCKED, Transaction MRBR displays the incoming invoice as blocked. Why?
    This has technical reasons.The system cannot distinguish whether the FI follow-on document was provided with a payment block already during the posting of the invoice or only subsequently.
    This causes no damage.If you want to release the invoice for payment, you can use Transaction MRBR as usual.
    I hope it helps to you.
    Regards,
    Burak

  • System is allowing to do invoice verification before goods receipt.

    Dear Friends,
                         I need your help in following scenario, as my system is allowing to do invoice verification before goods receipt.
    To test these scenario.I have created one PO.  For this PO I done goods receipt. I done invoice verification by putting invoice date as past date, posting date system date means current date. I want to stop this as system is allowing invoicing verification to be done before goods receipt.
    Also, I tried after un-ticking GR based IV.
    Please suggest me the solution how to stop this. Please help this is urgent.
    With Best Regards,
    Rajesh

    Hi Rajesh,
    A)
    In goods-receipt-based (GR-based) invoice verification, the invoice relates not to the purchase order, but to individual deliveries. That is to say, the reference document for the invoice is not the PO but the delivery note or the goods receipt document.
    Whether you use this approach depends on your billing arrangement with the vendor. This method can be advantageous, for example, when you know the order will be fulfilled by means of many partial deliveries.
    Prerequisites
    Before you can use GR-based invoice verification, the following prerequisites must be satisfied:
    The indicator for GR-based invoice verification (GR-based IV) must be selected for the relevant item in the purchase order (item detail screen).
    <b>
    A goods receipt must occur before the invoice is entered in the system.</b>
    B) If you are carrying out invoice verification with reference to PO, system will not check for the GR. The entire PO amount can be posted.
    Hope this clarifies.
    Thanks,
    Viswanath

  • Invoice Verification process with multiple payments

    Please advise us on the Invoice Verification process in case of multiple payments required  for single Quantity Purchase Order Lines. [ i.e. If the quantity of Purchase is 1 and we need to process  multiple invoices involving partial amount of the PO value, we end up in decimal errors in many cases. ]
    For e.g. we had a case were the Total PO amount was 7638, against quantity 1. A partial invoice was raised for amount  7545. We were unable to determine the exact quantity in the invoice document to derive the said amount. This was due to the limitation in the quantity field which is only supporting 3 decimals. Subsequent to this, we need to round off and also this caused problems in the next payment lot. The issue becomes more complicated when there is header discount , freight etc. specified in the PO  Header Conditions.
    This resulted in the discrepancy between Goods Receipt and Invoice Receipt Amounts for such POs.
    Please throw us some light to tackle this issue as per the best practices available in SAP.
    Also in this relation, Is it possible to enforce Quantity Tolerance in PO.

    HI,
    What you can do to over come such problem, is Put the Value Figure in Quantity field & Quantity in Net price field,
    As the Qty is 1, The total Amount paid to vendor will be same & no Need of calculating decimal.
    While making GRN, Put the actual Invoice value as qty.
    Hope this serves the purpose.
    Regards
    Mascot

  • PO - GR based Invoice Verification/ IR Indicator

    Hi,
    I am facing a problem with the IR indicator in PO. The scenario is a SC is created, a PO is created automatically out of the SC and then a GR confirmation has to be done against the PO. I am using a service product.
    In the vendor master, I have set the "Goods-Receipt-Based Invoice Verification" indicator and "Invoice Receipt Expected" indicator.
    Now, if I create PO manually then these 2 indicators are defaulted into the PO follow-on documents indicator values. However, when the PO is created automatically from the SC only the IR expected indicator is set so I am not able to create a confirmation against the PO.
    The same way, if I set the "Invoice Receipt Expected" indicator and "Indicator:GR Conf.Expectd" indicator in the vendor master then only the "Indicator:GR Conf.Expectd" is set in the PO (created from SC) and not the IR indicator.
    Can someone suggest to me what could the problem be since a manual creation of PO picks up the indicator values from the vendor but it does not when created from a SC?
    Many Thanks,
    Saravanan.

    hi,
    See the foll related threads/Links/pointers:
    Re: Confirmation for PO without SC
    Error Indicator for GR-based invoice verification when order PO
    Re: Receiving Services as Materials in order not to perform goods receipt
    Re: Indicator u0093GR Conf Expectedu0094 in Business Partner
    Invoice Receipt Expected controlled from R/3 Vendor master
    Vendor Data Replication Problem
    869055 "Follow-on Documents" PO EBP Confirmation Flag 20.05.2006
    912428 509(SE) Account assignment for entry sheet missing 19.01.2006
    886307 Creating follow-on docs in the Order Collaboration scenario 18.10.2005
    518340 EBP: Tolerance checks with goods receipt and invoice 08.06.2005
    502981 EBP: Terminatn w/ invoice creatn for back-end purchase order 08.06.2005
    450068 EBP: Checks to invoice for BE purchase order incorrect 08.06.2005
    834270 IV inbox message BBP_BD 002: "Invoice will be .. 13.05.2005
    784775 Goods receipt-based invoice verification indicator part 2
    BR,
    Disha.

  • How to stop Invoice Verification for Dulicate Invoice in MIRO.

    Dear friends,
    In configuration related to duplicate invoice in MIRO, we have selected "Reference Doc. Number". Also in Vendor Master  we have ticked the "Check Duplicate Invoice".
    Inspite of this system is giving only warning message at the time of MIRO against Duplicate Invoice. I want to convert it as error message.
    How to do this?
    Regards
    Siva

    Message number M8 108
    The category of this message can be changed in Customizing for Invoice 
    Verification.
    IMG > MM > LIV > Define Attributes of System Messages
    This means that you can receive a message as an error
    message even though it is defined as a warning message in the standard
    system.

  • Third party scenarioUnless & until invoice verification is done than system

    In Third Party scenario :
    1. In third party scenario Vendor supplies the Material to the customer  & Vendor sends the copy of invoice to the company. After the company did the invoice verification by using the T.code : MIRO. once this part is over than company create the invoice to the customer.
    " My requirement is, Unless & until invoice verification is done than system is not allow to create the invoice to the customer"
    How is to control & what are the configuration is required to met the full fil the condition

    Hello,
    Once you have set the blilling relevance to F (order-related billing on the basis of the invoice quantity), the system does not include the order in the billing due list (VF04) until an invoice from the vendor has been received and processed by the purchasing department.
    Yes also, if your billing relevance is F and you try to do billing to customer without carrying out vendor invoice, then you will get error message number VF032  No billing documents were generated. See log with error log as No open billing quantity has been determined message number VF147  and hence  you cannot do customer billing.
    Every time your vendor invoice is received, a customer invoice is created for the quantity in the vendor invoice and the order will be considered fully invoiced unless further vendor invoice is recieved.
    BR,
    Tushar
    Edited by: Tushar Patankar on Feb 15, 2011 11:47 AM

  • Invoice Verification - Tcode MIRO

    Hi, I would like to know if there is anyone who could help me on how to open the G/L field (HKONT) at Details tab in MIRO tcode to enable reconciliation accont changes during an Invoice Verification. In Brazilian Utilities Indutry Sector processes we legaly must have alternative reconciliation accounts for the same vendor.
    I've done a test enabling alternative reconciliation account in FI-GL and it works for the tcode FB60, opening automaticaly the field G/L at the Details tab allowing the user to change the account for an alternative one, but unfortunately for the tcode MIRO it simply doesn't works.
    I hope there is any MM configuration or enhancement which could enable this field.
    Thanks in advance,
    Daniel Damiani
    Business Senior Specialist at CSC

    Hi,
    It is not possible to explicitly change the account at the time an                
    invoice is posted through transaction MIRO, the way it is posible                 
    through FI. In MM, the accounts are automatically determined from the             
    customizing in transaction OMWB, or taken from the purchase order                 
    account assignment data.                                                                               
    You can also have a quick look in tr OMRMB, you will notice that field            
    INVFO-HKONT is not there to be customised.                                                                               
    There is no solution available within the SAP standard system for the             
    change of the reconciliation account for the vendor. Please check note            
    144081 for MIRO/MIR7 functions.                                                                               
    MM invoice verification was developed to finish the external procurement          
    process in logistics and check the invoice data sent by the vendors for           
    correctness (differences) and to post the corresponding accounting                
    document in FI additional.                                                                               
    Creating manually creditor invoices in FI have no relation to a logist            
    process. Therefore not all functions included in FI (FB60) are included           
    in MM invoice verification (MIRO) as well.                                                                               
    You can only change the reconciliation account via vendor master record:          
    Pls. choose "display vendor" in MIRO, than switch to the view accounting          
    information and change there the G/L account. This must be done by                
    every posting procedure and the change must be put back after booking             
    again.                                                                               
    Best regards
    Erika

  • Invoice verification number ranges

    Hi
    After processing a payment in MIR7, document number 5100519088 was assigned. When user processed the next payment 51000519063 was assigned. Can some one explain how these document numbers are being allocated, Normally the documents numbers are allocated in a sequential order..
    Checked in ILV number ranges, for all document types it is taking only one number ranges i.e 51.
    For creation and reversal invoice document it also taking same number ranges i.e 51
    Please help me to understand why it is not taking number ranges sequence wise ( only for 6 invoice documents)
    Thanks
    Andappa

    Hi,
    there can be various reasons for the gaps in invoice numbering.
    Please review the following notes in relation to gaps in numbers used:
    62077   Info: Internal number assignment is not continuous
    193020  Invoice verification: Gaps in number assignment
    175047  Causes for FI document number gaps (RF_BELEG)
    Main reason for numbering gaps is buffering. This is also described
    in attached note 62077.
    Document numbers can get lost in invoice verification if after choosing
    the 'Post' function (F11 or Ctrl+S) the system generates an error
    message or a termination message. In this case instruct users to pay
    attention to whether the system generates terminations or error messages
    after choosing post (F11 or Ctrl S). Ask them to note the message ID and
    the numbers, preferably together with the time. It is worth discovering
    a procedure, peculiar to your company or system configuration, that
    causes the system to generate other error or termination messages after
    posting (that is after number assignment). This should not normally be
    the case. All this is explaind in note 193020.
    Best Regards,
    Arminda Jack

  • For invoice verification transicion key

    as for gr bsx key is related, so for invoice verification which key is related?

    Hi,
    In spro goto>Materials Mgmt>valuation and a/c assgnment>a/c determination>a/c det.without wizard>beside configure automatic posting click on the documetation
    you will find all the detail description of these keys
    BR
    Diwakar

  • "LIV" (Logistics Invoice Verification) BI cube ?  Is there anything like ht

    I have been having a difficult time trying to get an answer to a question. 
    We currently capture Spend in R/3 by looking at the PO related invoices (posted via LIV) and the non-PO related invoices (posted via FI-AP). When we create our R/3 ABAP 'spend reports' we look at the date when the the invoices were paid (cleared), and subtotal by business area or IO#.  We cannot use the PO line item cube, because that doesn't show the spend by the paid (cleared) date of the invoice. 
    What cubes do I need to load in BI to get this same type of data?  I'm thinking it would be an "LIV" (Logistics Invoice Verification) cube, but I cannot find any information on that.

    Hi
    During the Duplicate Invoice check, the system checks for the following:
    Vendor
    Currency
    Company code
    Gross invoice amount
    Reference document number
    Invoice document date
    If the same matches, you can set up an error/warning message. The  message set up is done in:
    OBA5
    Application Area WS
    Message No.121
    Online and Batch : E
    If you want to write your own checking logic using the Business Transaction Step 110. For activating BTE
    1. Create a Function module by copying SAMPLE_PROCESS_00001110 and adding your own Abap code for duplicate invoice checking.
    2. Go to T.code FIBF and in the menu go to Settings->Products -> Of a customer
    3. Create a new product and save
    4. Again go to T.code FIBF and in the menu go to Settings->Process modules-> of a Customer
    5. Create new entry as follows and save.
    Event: 00001110 Appl:FI-FI Function Module : (Name of the FM you have created) Product : (The one which you have created)
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari
    <a href="http://www.vcq.biz/">ronaldo wallpapers</a>, <a href="http://www.utorrent.name/">utorrent</a>Hi
    <a href="http://freeebooks.name/">books online</a>, <a href="http://www.utorrent.name/">utorrent</a>

Maybe you are looking for

  • Sql 2005 Remote Connection

    I am having a problem connecting to a remote SQL server 2005 instance.  The remote server is for a website hosting account of mine.  I can connect to the server from computers other than the problem computer just fine.  I cannot connect to the server

  • Steps to create Quality Notification

    Hi, Can anyone let me know the steps involved and the process to create Quality Notification. Regards, Ram

  • I've had my hard drive replaced and the iPhoto app is gone

    Where did my iPhoto app go on my computer? Hard rice has been replaced

  • Wrong import date

    When I import pictures into iphoto 8, the date shows Jan 5, 2007 on all the pictures, even the current pictures. I know the camera date is accurate. Does anyone know why this is and how to correct it?

  • Unable to Sync after Restoring iPod

    When connecting my iPod to iTUNES, this error message comes up, "iTUNEs has detected an iPod in recovery mode. You must restore this iPod before it can be used with iTunes." I Restore, but it never allows me to Sync. The same message keeps appearing.