Invoices not posted for accounting(Error:Max. no of items in FI is reached)

Dear Experts,
I have an issue in the billing document.It is not getting posted for Accounting even it is 23(230)and in some cases it is 30 lines line items in it.
It is shoing the error as Max. no of items in FI is reached.
This problem is in Production client only.As we have seen and checked the setting in all the client. It is same every where.
Could any one help.
The SAP help says:The number of accounting line items are restricted to 999 therefore your billing document line items should be significantly less than that to prevent a failure to post an accounting document.
There are two options open to you, one is to split the billing document automatically each time a maximum number of line items are reached, take a look at IMG > Billing >Country Specific Features > Maximum number of Billing Items, then in your copy control line item Data VBRK/VBRP include the following codeu201D

Hi,
Check Note 36353 'AC interface: Summarizing FI documents', it give you ideas as how you can avoid this big number of FI items.
I hope this helps you,
Regards,
Eduardo

Similar Messages

  • Accounting documents are not posted for Excise invoice

    Hi,
    1. The Excise invoice has been created with reference to F2 invoice but the accounting documents is not posted for excise invoice, what is the settings needs tobe maintained to post the accounting entries to excise invoice..?
    2. where we will maintain number ranges for excise invoice..?
    Thanks
    Rao..

    hi
    1. The Excise invoice has been created with reference to F2 invoice but the accounting documents is not posted for excise invoice, what is the settings needs tobe maintained to post the accounting entries to excise invoice..?
    Not sure but can u try to relese this to accounting
    2. where we will maintain number ranges for excise invoice..?
    Excise invoice number range is depend on Excise series group.
    T-Code : SNRO
    Following is the No. Range Objects related to Excise, select the proper no. range object as per your requirement.
    J_1I57FC - 57FC Number Range
    J_1IARE1 - ARE1 Doc No object based on Series Group
    J_1IARE3 - ARE3 Doc No object based on Series Group
    J_1IBOND - Excise Bonding: Bond number object
    J_1ICERT - Withholding Tax Certificates (India)
    J_1ICHLNNO - Internal number range for challans
    J_1ICONPLA - Consolidated PLA serial no. generation
    J_1IDEPINV - Excise Invoice Number for Depot Invoices
    J_1IEXCEXP - Export excise invoice number range
    J_1IEXCINV - Excise invoice number
    J_1IEXCLOC - Local excise invoice numebr range
    J_1IEXCTST - Excise invoice with intervals
    J_1IEXINEX - Excise invoice number for export
    J_1IINTNUM - Internally document number to be generated
    J_1IINTPR2 - Despatch serial number
    J_1ILIC - Excise Bonding: License number object
    J_1IPLA2 - PLA part II number range object
    J_1IRG1 - RG1 Number range object
    J_1IRG1_T - No. Range for RG1 - Excise group / Material
    J_1IRG23A1 - RG23A part 1 no. range object
    J_1IRG23A2 - RG23A part II number range object
    J_1IRG23C1 - RG23C part I number range object
    J_1IRG23C2 - RG23C part II number range object
    J_1IRG23D - Folio Numbers for RG 23D
    Check the link
    Re: Excise Invoice Number Range
    excise invoice and domestic invoice sharing same number range

  • Accounting entry against Excise invoice not created  for Service Tax sales

    Dear all,
        I am facing one problem related to accounting entry against excise invoice not created, for service tax sales scenario in SEZ plant.
    Accounting entry against billing document is generated,which contains revenue account-Debit entry,service tax 10% --Debit entry,ECS-Service tax 2% --Debit entry, SECess Service Tax 1% --Debit entry & Sundry Debtors (Reco)  - Domestic(Customer receivable reconciallation) account-Credit entry.
      But after generating excise invoice, accouning entries not generated for clearing of Cenvat suspense entry(i.e.service tax 10% ,ECS-Service tax 2% , SECess Service Tax 1%) which is generated during billing document.
    Plz. suggest step by step guideline to resolve this issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Mukesh Pardeshi

    Hi ReazuddinMD,
    thanks for your reply and support...I checked all the entries/accounts maintained correct.. but the Accounting entrys against Excise invoice not created..
    Now i am geeting error as below at the time of saving Excise invoice,
    No account is specified in item 0000000001
    Message no. F5670
    Diagnosis
    No account was specified for account type "S" in item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.
    System Response
    The Financial Accounting program cannot process the document.
    Procedure
    A system error has probably occurred in the application you called up. Check the data transferred to item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.

  • Delivery free of charge Invoice should not Post to accounting

    Hello,
    As per Client's specific Business process , till now ZERO value Invoice(Delivery Free of charge) is created (This is not SAP Standard).
    No accounting document is generated because of ZERO value of Invoice.
    Only COPA Document is generated.
    ZERO value invoice is generated because of all Pricing Conditions are Statistical in Pricing Procedure.
    Now , Requirement is to create Invoice with Values & also Print values in Invoice, without posting it to accounting.
    The simplest way to do it to remove Statistical check from all Pricing conditions , Values will start Printing.
    But in this case ,Invoice getting started posted to accounting.
    Q:- Please let me know the simplest way to create Invoice (Delivery Free of Charge) with values but on the same time , it should not post to accounting only COPA should be generated.
    (AR Electronic Invoice)
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Vikas

    Hi,
    Free of charge Deliveries are basically of 2 types.
    1. When you send Promotinal materials for display purpose, Physician samples in pharma industry etc.
    Those materials do not have any commercial values, they are send free-of-charge.
    We process those materials with Order Type FD (Free-of-charge Delivery).
    2. Another case, when suppose you had sent 10 units of some material (commercially valued materials) for which customer has already paid the money to you.
    After that suppose customer has found that 2 units are damaged or defective for which he has returned the 2 units to you.
    Here, you have 2 options to compensate the customer, either you will issue a Credit Memo or you will replace with fresh units for those 2 returned units.
    If, you will replace 2 fresh units to the customer, then it is called "Subsequent Delivery Free-of -chrge".
    The Order Type used for the above is "SDF".
    In this case, even though the material is a commercially valued material but we send it as free-of-charge as Customer has already has paid for it.
    In both the above case, may it be "Free-of-charge Delivery (FD)" or "Subsequent Free-of-charge Delivery (SDF)", both the transactions are not relevant for Billing.
    You can check the same in Sales document Item category KLN and KLX, both are not relevant for Billing. That means you can not create a commercial Invoice for those transactions.
    In the above case, if required we create Proforma Invoice with reference to the Delivery document.
    Proforma Invoice is a dummy Invoice and  not posted to Accounting.
    So, in your case you can create a Proforma Invoice.
    Regards
    Pradyumna

  • Solutiom for EXCISE INVOICE NOT CREATEED FOR THIS DOCUMENT

    hi,
      wlhile i want print preview in transaction VF03/VF02 for a particular biiling document number ,  i get the  error message  "EXCISE INVOICE NOT CREATEED FOR THIS DOCUMENT" .what is the solution?

    HI Tej
    All the Import cycle has created three documents.
    1. MIRO doc for custom duties and CVD .--   MIRO posted in USD .  I can see the doc in both currency -  INr and USD via accounting doc - display currency.  I do not have any issue.
    2. MIGO doc - for custom duty and Freight -   MIGO posted in INR , I can see accounting doc in USD and INR both via accounting document-  Display currency and even in the MIGO -- purchase order history tab.
    3. Excise Invoice - for CVD -  EX Invoice posted in diifferent way --
    In this document please note amounts for CVD is as per USD rate , but currency showing is INR , which is a mismatch.
    in Excise customization for company code setting - exchange rate type M is maintained. OB08 is also maintained for USD/INR
    Condition type JCV1 is also marked with currency conversion and accruals.
    Is there any patch or note I need to apply to getting this converted , or any process issue.
    Regds
    Mukta

  • Exchange rate diff. accts are not defined for account 16145110currency INR

    Dear SAP Gurrus,
    I am facing a problem while making  payment against invoice, receiving payment against invoice, clearing advance payment and  advance receipts through T-code F-53, F-28, F-44 and F-32.  System is allowing me to select the invoices against which I want to do the clearing but when I go for simulation I am getting the following error -
    ' Exchange rate diff. accts are not defined for account 16145110currency INR'.
    When I click on the error message the performance assistant gives methe following details:
    Exchange rate diff.accts are not defined for account 16145110 currency INR
    Message no. F5062
    Diagnosis
    The accounts for posting the exchange rate differences could not be determined. For the specified G/L account and the specified currency key, no corresponding exchange rate difference accounts were determined.
    System Response
    The system cannot generate the exchange rate difference posting.
    Procedure
    By pressing ENTER, you achieve that the document is reset to a status without automatic posting. In another window, you can complete the default settings for exchange rate differences and post the document afterwards.
    Proceed
    My client is local. Even the local currency is set to 'INR'. There is no foreign currency involced while making invoices, payment and receitps.  Eventhough the system is giving me error.  As a result I am not able to clear open items. Please give me some feasible solution so that I can clear the open items.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Shreyas Wani

    hi,
    As you said, you are not maintaining any Exchange rate differences, It may not be required a Exch rate Diffrences account.
    Please check whether you have created any Group / Parrallel curencies etc in co.code level.
    Please go through the notes 209580 / 89531, hope it helps you.
    Regards
    Kanna

  • An entry in field Funds Ctr is not permitted for account 401000 Message no F5394

    Hi Friends,
    I have done Fund Management configuration and while posting the document through FB50, I am getting error message " An entry in field Funds Ctr is not permitted for account 401000 "Message no. F5394 and I also checked Field status and Posting keys for Gl account and everything looks fine..
    Please help on this..
    Thanks
    Goutam

    Hi,
    please check the message the error will give you the table number or Programme  name
    go to SE38  for programme and for table SM30
    system will show where is the exact error facing.
    thanks

  • Period 001/2010 is not open for account type S and G/L 799999

    Hi friends
    I am in SD. I am trying to create stock for newly created material, movement type 561. system give error Period 001/2010 is not open for account type S and G/L 799999.
    I use the T. Code OB52, i am confuse which combination i.e. variant, A, from Account, To Account, from per. 1 Year, To period, Year, from per. 2 year, To Period, Year, I should choose, can some one send me detail reply and solution which may display after this t. code OB52. I also have questin which movement type i should use.
    Using T.Code MMPV, i have created new period (from company code 1000, To Company code 1000, period 01, Fiscal Year 1020.
    I was reading previous solution, one of them was i should close period 2009. I tried to do this using using MMPV, i entered fiscal year 2009. Error display  The specified year 2009 is not the current calender year.
    Thanks
    Raj

    Hi
    Hope you are doing this in test server
    If this is a real time issue this needs to be addressed by a FI consultant
    First see for your company code what is the posting period varient maintained in OBY6
    Say if it is 1000
    Then in OB52
    Maintain a setting like this
    1000-S-BLANK-ZZZZZZZZZZ-1--2010122010-13--201016--2010
    Then save it
    This is for Account type S that is GL accounts
    Preferably maintain the same for      A,   + ,   D,   K,   M,   V
    Regards
    Raja

  • Payer 1234 is not defined for account 9999 3333

    Hi All
    When trying to block the Customer Sales Invoice in FB02 with Payment Block 'A' getting the error as 'Payer 1234 is not defined for account 99999 3333'.
    Our scenario is like this:
    1. Sale Order is raised against Customer 9999 in company code 3333.  Customer 1234 is bill to party in this sale order.  All other partners (Sold to Party, Ship to Party, Payer ) are 9999 only.
    2. Invoice is created and released to Billing.
    3. Now when we are trying to block the Invoice getting the error message mentioned above.
    I have checked the sales are partner functions for 1234 and 9999 in the master records.  for 1234 all partner functions are 1234 and for 9999, 9999 only.
    So, when I have not maintained 1234 as payer anywhere, why is it expecting to maintian alternatifve payer..
    I have replicated the same in our pre production but works fine there without any error messages.
    Can you pls advise where It's going wrong.
    Regards
    Rayala

    Hi Friends,
    I have further investigated and found that there is a substituion where in Bill to Party act as a Payer.  So system expecting Bill to party to be maintained as payer.
    Thanks all
    Rayala

  • SD Staticall Condition Not Posting Into Accounting

    Dear All,
    Need your help. Urgent...
    My business requirement is to post Staticall condition value in G/L count. For that I did the following config.
    1. V/06: Configured new condition type ZCRL,with Cond. class :Discount or surcharge ,Calculat.type :Percentage and activated for 'Accruals'
    2. Assigned this ZCRL to Pricing procedure with account key and accruls.
    3. Maintian G/L accounts for both account keys and accruls in VK0A.
    However in billing document  I can see ZCRL condition type at Item level with account keys , but not posting in accounting.
    Pricing condition PR00 is posting into account.
    Could some body please help on this.
    Much appreciated your help.
    Thanks a lot.
    Regards,
    Jai

    Hi All,
    Many thanks for your prompt responce.
    In my further invistigation I found this is b'c of  IS-Oil. My client recently upgraded to IS-Oil and SD and IS-Oil table got corrupted.
    In sales order item condition 'New filed get updated i.e Invoice
    Cycle’ , which is coming from IS-oIL table.
    Pls check the below attachment.
    To reslove this issue, need to activate Split invoice cycle at Is-Oil billing document type.
    Much appreciated your help.
    Thanks a lot.
    Regards,
    Jai

  • Billing Document not posted to accounting

    Hello All,
    Billing Document not posted to accounting & throws error , if trying to release in VFX3:-
    Document number 1001003528 in company code 0952 in fiscal year 2010 is affected
    Message no. FF099.
    Please advice.
    Regards,
    Vikas

    Hello Vikas;
    Maybe you are trying to post FI document which does not correspond to SAP standard.  
    Check if your document has 2 line items with the same tax code AA and tax        
    condition MWS (one tax rate 0% and 30 %, for instance). It must be either different   
    tax codes and or tax conditions.   
    Hope it can help.
    Ruy Castro

  • Part 1 not Post for excess of qty

    Hi.
    I have one problem during STO
    When i despetch 1 Material total of 108 KG in different batch say B1(40),B2(41) and B3(27)
    I make delivery say DEL1
    I make excise invoice say EXC1 for qty 108 for three batch
    when i go for MIGO against outbound delivery DEL1 and enter excise invoice EXC! with Part 1 system shows me error message Part 1 not Post for excess GR qty
    and in excise tab it shows qty for 1 batch only say B3 for all item tab.
    Thanks & Regards
    Chetan

    Dear,
    Two way,
    1) Cancel Good receipt document with MIGO t-code and create new document for material receipt and capture part 1.
    2) Go J1IEX - capture excise invoice against your material document.
    Than post it with J1IEX.
    Regards,
    Mahesh Wagh

  • Cancellation Internal Credit memo is not posted into Accounting

    Hello All,
                We have a requirement where the cancellation internal credit memo is not posted into accounting. It is a inter company sales return process. After return delivery, client created the internal credit memo. But due to some problem they cancelled the internal credit memo. But now system is not posted the cancellation internal credit memo into accounting. I did my analysis and found that client is using same number range for internal credit memo and accounting document. When internal credit memo is created system is assign the same number range to accounting document because of external number range field is ticked in Fbn1 .But due to wrong number assignment in internal credit memo. So when they cancel the internal credit memo, this internal credit memo number range is coming within the accounting document number range.But client is insisting that anyhow the cancel inter credit memo should be posted to accounting.
       I have tried a lot. but i could not reach out to any solution. Kindly help me on proving me a solution on this.
    Regards
    Soumendu

    Dear Soumendu:
    I had received this warning when the invoice was cleared. If you revert this process is possible to post the cancellation into accounting.
    Please check the status of the invoice.
    Regards
    Antonio Martinez R.

  • Cross Company MIRO Transaction - BSEG-TXGRP Not Valued for Account Type "S"

    I am working with the ABAP group to create tax reports for audits and sales tax charged by vendor.  I am basically wanting a line item report of all purchases along with any tax applied to each line.  Therefore, I am, for the most part, using tables BKPF, BSEG, and BSET.  For our US transactions, we have one company paying the invoice on behalf of all other US companies.  Essentially, every transaction is a cross-company transaction.  The problem is I am having a hard time tying BSEG to BSET by line item.  For FB60 transactions, I can tie BSEG-TXGRP to BSET-TXGRP; however, for MIRO transactions, BSEG-TXGRP is not valued for Account Type "S" (GL Accounts).  Any ideas?  I could not find a note to capture this issue.  There was a note, but it was with regard to Account Types "D" and "K" I believe, vendor and customer accounts.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Deanna

    So,
    Did you ever resolve this.  I have the EXACT problem right now.   Inter-co. MIRO documents only getting TAXGRP popuplated for Original Co. Document (not cross-co. document).
    Thanks,
    - Tim

  • Planned Dep not posted for retired assets

    Hi ,
    We are running the asset depreication everymonth end, and it was posting without any errors.
    But suddenly we found that some assets which we retired have still not posted the balance depreication and it is still reflecting in Planned Depreication in AW01N for previous months.
    Eg: Asset retired on 29th of a month. Depreciation was not posted for this 29 days. and this balance still lies in planned depreication even after the depreciation run.
    When i try to do a repeat run it gives an error message,
    depreication for Peirod...... already posted.
    As we have already run the depreciation, kindly suggest what best can be done without affecting the depreciation which is posted for other assets which is correct.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sanjay Marathe

    Dear Ramesh,
    Thanks for the update, i have got once more important information on this.
    The problem lies only in one asset.
    When they posted the depreiciation, in the actual run it gave a warning message that
    " The posted depreciation and estimated depreciation are different" .  But as the user was not aware regarding the Rerun and he has posted depreciation for subsequent periods.
    And now it is not allowing to do a rerun for pervious periods.
    Acq date :           9/11/2004
    DOC       :           9/11/2004
    Retirement date : 29/05/2007
    useful life  :          5yrs
    Dep key LINR :     SLM from remaining life to book value zero.
    Depreciation to the day is checked in the Dep Key
    Exp useful life 2 years 161 days as on 31st march 2006
    It was migrated on 1/4/2006 to SAP.
    Points will be awarded.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sanjay Marathe

Maybe you are looking for

  • Blackberry Desktop Manager Language

    Why is it that when I download Blackberry Desktop Manager from the Offical Blackberry Website it comes in Arabic and doesnt give you the option to change the Language. Funilly enough I don't read Arabic so I cant exactly search for Setting/Language.

  • Reliability of officejet pro 8600's?

    Hi- I am looking for a new HP printer. I have been checking out either the officejet pro 8600 plus or premium. I have been seeing a lot of problems about printer heads. How reliable are the officejet pros?  Thanks- Petlover

  • SQL Server 2012 & sp_describe_first_result_set performance overhead?

    Hi All, I'm just wondering if anyone has had the same experience as me when testing queries between SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2 (our DEV Server) and SQL Server 2012 SP1 (our soon to be PROD server). We have a query the Spatial Services department run on t

  • Another problem creating AuthenticationContext

    I am running Access Manager and IdentityManager 2005Q4 on separate Solaris servers. I am unable to configure IdentityManager to provision Access Manager accounts. I hve followed (and re-followed) the steps in the Resource Reference (the latest versio

  • Quicken for Mac replacement - won't work with Lion

    Quicken has sent an announcement to users confirming that Quicken for Mac 2005-2007 will not work with Lion, and encourage these users to begin using Quicken Essentials.  Obviously this is not an option for many.  I'm going to try out iBank 4 as a fu