Invoicing Party In MIRO

Hi,
My problem is when I am doing MIRO the most of the fields in the header section loaded to the screen according to the PO one of the field is Invoice Party in the Detail Tab with label Inv. Party. But itu2019s open for input it means that user can change the invoice party and will go ahead. Now I donu2019t want that. user should not change the Invoice Party in MIRO for that I want to make this field only input field (Gray Filed).
I am trying to do same with Screen variant (SHD0) but there is some problem, so kindly request please arrane to give some document on this issue
If still have any doubt please revert back
Thanks in Advance
Warm Regards,
Mukesh Chejara

hi
best way is to change the message settings to ERROR.
WHen you change it the message must b coming like below
Account has been changed: Dependent data will be initialised
Message no. F5A119
so change this msg to ERROR with the help of ABAP guy.
check this thread
Problem in MIRO(IV)
for SHD0 take help of ur abaper
First you have to go in SHD0 and you will enter Screen Name ex
"miro" and the trasaction variant name you want to create (F5).
It will take you to MIRO and you will enter values. A window
will pop up asking you to check whatever you want to make
mandatory. Go through and save. Up at the top menu once you
get back to SHD0 initial screen, at the top menu, you will find
Deactivate Standard variant and again enter the Variant you want
to assign and go to the top menu and click assign variant. This
should work. It worked for me.
regards
kunal
Edited by: kunal ingale on Nov 14, 2008 8:02 AM

Similar Messages

  • Payment terms for changed invoicing party in miro

    Hi Experts,
    how and which payment terms get copied when invoicing party changed in miro
    Rgds

    hi
    i will request you to check once again, in PO pmt terms flows from pur org data of vendor master and the same po pmt terms flows into invoice those things are clear.
    my question is that if I change invoicing party in MIRO then which payment terms get copied, pmt terms of orginal vendor or the new invoicing party pmt terms and also the pmt terms of PO ,co.code or the pur org which one?
    is there any rule or customization for that?
    rgds

  • Warning message required when we chnage invoicing party in MIRO

    HI All,
    Our client require the below settings.
    If we change the invoicing party in MIRO which is different than the PO vendor then system should throw warning message or pop up.
    I had tried to convence them that it can impact scenarios but they says they require warning message at least so that if anybody is changing the Invoicing party then he will get the message.
    I had tried by maintaining M8286 message in OBA5 but i didnt got the warining.
    Please suggest how we can achieve this.
    Regards,
    Umesh

    Dear,
    Take ABAPer help to make a warning/error message - if invoicing party chaged.
    Secondly please go through OSS : 322430 & 1156325.
    Also BADI for changing payment terms in MIRO "MRM_PAYMENT_TERMS ".
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

  • Restricting changes in Invoicing party in MIRO transaction

    Hi MM gurus,
    Did anyone try to change the messages
    M8 286 Different invoicing party & planned in purchase order &
    M8 288 Different invoicing party & planned in purchase order &
    for the MIRO transaction?
    Our requirement is to restrict the users in MIRO screen for changing the invoicing party to a different vendor.
    1) Is there any other way to achieve this functionality?
    We should not allow users to change the invoicing party when they create MIRO.
    Request help in this regard and thanks in advance.
    Best regards,
    Sridhar

    Hi,
    1.- standard message
    M8 286 Different invoicing party & planned in purchase order &
    This message appears when the vendor of MIRO transaction is different from vendor of PO.
    2.- badi message
    The solution i proposed appears when you´ve saved the document and you modify the document to change the vendor regardless of if it is the same of the PO or not.
    If the vendor is different from the one saved in the first place a message would appear.
    Maybe i got it wrong and this is not what you expected.
    Perhaps this is what you need:
    check transaction code OMRM and change the message 286/288, class M8, from W to E (error).
    Best regards.
    Edited by: Pablo Casamayor on Dec 8, 2009 5:33 PM

  • If Invoicing party is changed in MIRO otherr than PO vendor then warning me

    HI All,
    Our client require the below settings.
    If we change the invoicing party in MIRO which is different than the PO vendor then system should throw warning message or pop up.
    I had tried to convence them that it can impact scenarios but they says they require warning message at least so that if anybody is changing the Invoicing party then he will get the message.
    I had tried by maintaining M8286 message in OBA5 but i didnt got the warining.
    Please suggest how we can achieve this.
    Regards,
    Umesh

    Hi,
    This should have been in MM forum than SD. However, you can try this in one of the ways.
    a. Try to create a validation in Tcode GGB0. You can write a piece of code. This code triggers while you are saving the document. You can create your message and make it a warning or a hard error. Please make sure that you generate the validation once you save it.
    b. Find a user exit which will trigger in MIRO Tcode. Put a piece of code there which checks if MIRO vendor is different than PO vendor. If yes, it can give a warning. Else, it can go ahead and save the document.
    c. May be you can try once more to check by changing the message in OBA5.
    Hope this helps...
    Regards,
    Mukund S

  • Invoiceing party at header level in MIRO

    Hi,
    We have different invoicing parties defined for the same vendor at the plant level in Alternative Data. But, the invoicing party in MIRO is at the header level. When we do MIRO by vendor, it does pull in all the POs but those POs have different IPs because they are from different plants. However, in MIRO, the system deposits the IP from the first PO at the header level and will create the A/P for all the POs against that IP.
    Any way around this? To make the system determine the IP from the underlying PO and do the MIRP-A/P accordingly i.e. post the A/P to the correct IP defined in the PO? Of course, we could do MIRO by plant but considering the very high volumes and the number of plants we have, that is rather inefficient and we would prefer doing it by the vendor code if possible.
    Thanks.

    Dear Tengku
    Please try with this.
    Go to V/08, for the net value field, maintain Routine 16 in the Alt. Cal. Type. Also add Routine 17 to Netvalue.
    As you know Condition types are assigned at each item level. So rounding off is calculated at each item level. But by assigning a tick in the Group Condition while defining Rounding off Condition, you can do rounding off at invoice level. The difference is automatically adjusted at each item.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • MIRO user exist for invoicing party

    Dear Experts ,
    I have a requirement where in i need the system to automatically pick a different invoicing party ( as per pre defined  logic ) .
    Please suggest me SPECIFIC exit / BAPI where in i can fit my logic so that the system suggest the invoicing party in MIRO transaction as per requirement .
    Regards
    Anis

    Hello Wojciech,
    Thanks for the prompt response .
    I did locate the BADI - INVOICE_UPDATE, but , as per discussions with my technical team & note 1156325 , the data changed in the BAdI is not processed further in the standard program MIRO.
    Further , as specified in note 1156325 there is only one relevant BADI for MIRO , that is MRM_TRANSACT_DEFAULT
    , but it cannot change/default the invoicing party in MIRO.
    My requirement is that I want to populate a different  invoicing party as per the documnet for which the invoice is being booked via tcode MIRO.
    Please suggest how can this be done .
    Regards
    Anis

  • Invoicing Party not getting picked up in MIRO

    Dear Experts ,
    I followed the steps as under :
    1. Created a PO w/o PI
    2. Changed PO & added PI.
    3. Did GR
    4. Did IV , but the vendor in MIRO was the PO vendor & not the PI vendor .
    5. Created Debit memo as the invoicing party was wrong .
    After this too i have tried several times , but the system doesnt pick up the PI vendor .
    I Cannot change the invoicing party in MIRO as for control purpose & business requirements , the field is display only .
    Please suggest what could be wrong ?
    Regards
    Anis

    Hi,
    Check the PO .. which is picked the Invoice party partner..
    If PO is picked the PI partner .. then it will not be any problem..
    check the PI vendor number & recon. accounts.. how you have maintained..
    MIRO it should pick automatically if you maintain the PI vendor before MIGO.
    SAM

  • Invoicing party change

    Hi all,
    My problem is like this:
    I have received the GR from XYZ Vendor. The entries was posted correctly with GR/IR Clearing.
    and made the PO for the same with no 1234.
    Now my user using the PO 1234 and changed the invoicing party in MIRO as ABC. The system allowed and passed the entries though i didnt maintain the partner function in the vendor masters. this ABC was another Vendor in this company. The entries passed the changed vendor (ABC).
    Here i need to stop passing entries like this. I want a error message to prevent, this means system should not allow to use the PO for other vendors.
    what customization i need to do this?
    Best Regards,
    Soma

    Hi!
    You can  tried  to   Disply  in  Invoice  party  in  greay  area (Diplay mode), you can tried  to make  validation  in  MIRO.
    thanks
    Rup

  • In MIRO i am getting error message " vendor is not invoicing party in STO

    Dear All,
    i create one STO MM. This is plant to plant transfer STO. i entered few conditions. for this conditions i mentioned Vendor in condition detail.
    at the time of MIRO i am getting error message vendor is not invoicing party in PO ( STO).
    i checked the vendo master. all partner function are maintained.
    so please guide me
    Thanks
    h shah

    HI,
    Check u had done the below steps,
    Create STO and  input the freight/delivery costs in PO and assign the Transporter or Freight Vendor to the conditions by clicking on "Details" button in Conditions Tab
    For that you have to do following settings;
    Go to SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Purchase Order > Define Document Types > Here select "UB" and copy to a new PO Doc type.
    In SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Conditions > Define Price Determination Process > Define Schema Determination > Determine Schema for Stock Transport Orders > Here assign Calculation Schema "RM2000" i.e. Stock Transfer Document to Schema Grp Pur. Org, STO Type (New One) and Supplying Plant.
    Calculation Schema "RM2000" has condition type P101 which will pick up the MAP of supplying plant automatically during creation of STO in ME21N ("Conditions" Tab).
    You can create new freight/delivery cost conditions in M/06 and assign in pricing procedure "RM2000" in M/08
    After STO, do Outbound delivery in VL10D, then GR in MIGO and then go for LIV w.r.t. STO in MIRO
    Here select "Planned Delivery Cost" and do necessary procedure.
    Regards
    KK

  • MIRO - Invoice Party - User Exit needed

    Hi,
    I have a requirement like this....
      On MIRO tcode, the i need to put a condition if the user gives a Inv Party (3rd tab 'Details' on Header data of MIRO screen) other than the defalut one (vendor which comes by default with the PO)
    <u>Inputs to MIRO are :</u>
    1. invoice date on first tab of header data
    2. Existign PO number in Purchase Order/Scheduling Agreement ( just below the header data block
    3. in 3rd tab of header details (Details tab), on Inv.Party field, it takes the vendor number by default when we give the 2nd input (PO number)
    Can any body tell, which function module exit to work with ?
    PLEASE DO NOT GIVE ME the list of exits and badis by executing the ZUSEREXIT program.
    I have already done this.
    I would like to know which user exit to select out of this total exits.
    Thanks for your Help
    "Share and Learn"

    Hi Ali,
    My requirement is like,
    the user should not be allowed to give the Invoice Party field - value as different from the one different from the vendor number which already assigned to the PO while PO Creation.
    Please read the query in this thread for more details.
    I have found the list of exits, for MIRO, by executing ZUSEREXIT, and i got a list of exits and one BADI. But I am not sure which Exit will work for my requirements.
    ========== xxx ============
    Please, also tell me, how to identify the exact 'function module exit' which suits to our requirement, from the set of all exits displayed after executing ZUSEREXIT program.  (approaches/methods , u follow to identify)
    Thanks

  • MIRO: blocking the modification of the filed "invoicing party"

    Hi All,
    With reference to the t.code MIRO, I'd like to know if is possible to block the modification of the filed "invoicing party" in the tab "invoice"
    THANKS

    can you try if it is there in field selection

  • Replacement of MIRO Invoicing Party (RBKP-LIFNR) with PO Invoicing Party

    Hi,
    As per one of our business requirement, we want to replace MIRO Invoicing Party (RBKP-LIFNR) with PO Invoicing Party (EKKO-LFRKE) for correct tax calculation during MIRO.
    For that we tried to apply BAdis suggested as per SAP Note 1156325 - BAdIs in the Logistics Invoice Verification environment and others. But these BAdis are not enough useful to resolve above problem.
    Pls suggest another BAdi / exit for above problem, which can replace  MIRO Invoicing Party (RBKP-LIFNR) during MIRO .
    Thanks & Regards,
    Taral Patel

    Hi,
    Thanks for your reply.
    below is our business scenario :
    "PO is created on branch vendor (with a HO vendor mentioned in master).
    While doing MIRO, the system automatically replaces the branch vendor with the Head
    office vendor (as mentioned in master). The region taken for tax purpose is the region of the
      HO  vendor.
    for above problem, I have been suggested Note 1156325 from the forum, but none of the BAdi seems feasible (checked with our SAP ABAP Consultant) for this requirement to replace MIRO Invoicing Party (RBKP-LIFNR) with PO Invoicing Party (EKKO-LFRKE).
    It would be great help if u can suggest ny BAdi / exit for this requirement.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Taral Patel

  • Error message : Vendor is not an invoicing party in stock transfer PO

    Dear All,
    i need help on this issue
    1. user create a Stock transfer PO
    2. in condition he put condition but he forget to enter vendor code in condition detail.
    3. GRN is done
    4. after GRN he entered vendor code in the condition detail ( in the PO)
    5. but at the time of MIRO user is getting  error "Vendor is not an invoicing party"
    Note : here it is not possible to reverse GRN.
    so please guide me on this
    Thanks
    h shah

    Hi,
    Check the vendor for Fright vendor.
    If fright vendor then check in MIRO --> selected planned delivery cost ... or not..
    SAM

  • PO vendor is not an invoicing party

    Hi,
    Would like to seek for help for the following scenerio,unable to post transaction from MIRO to FICO during invoice verification level with the above subject.
    Later, we found out the capex purchase order have  worngly selected an invalid vendor which was the vendor is not created under our company code but the purchase order instead created the same purchasing  organization and the purchase order have been posted previous fiscal year and the Material Management module period have been close.
    Later, we try to extend the vendor which was selected worngly to our company code in order to proceed with the MIRO to resolve the problem. However, we still not able to proceed with the miro as system trigger error message item is invalid.
    Please advise.

    First check, whether the vendor is defined as invoicing party.
    Secondly. you can overcome by taking the help of partner function. Check the account group to which the vendor master is assigned. Check what partner function schema can be assigned to the account group.If the partner function schema allows you to assign a different vendor as the invoicing party, please, then create a new vendor master, define it as an invoicing party and assign it to the wrongly entered vendor as an invoicing party on behalf.
    I hope, you can overcome the issue.
    Regards,
    Ranjan

Maybe you are looking for