Invoicing Party relationship not carried through to PO in ECC

SRM 5 extended classic SPK12
Hello Gurus
We have our vendors synchronised with our R3 backend including the Invoicing parties. This all appears to work ok and can see them individually if we use BP. However, when we attempt to raise a PO against the actual order VN vendor #, when we check in ECC using ME23N, we do not see the invoicing party mentioned in the Partners tab, which causes problems when paying.
Have I forgotten something or am wrongfully assuming that the partnering function that is visible in ECC, does not carry through to SRM?
I've tried to go through all notes but don't see anything in there, which leads me to believe it's really obvious.
Thanks in advance.
Ian

Can anybody help?

Similar Messages

I create an enterprise project template in Project Professional but when I go to create a project in PWA the formattting does not carry through to the project

Hi
Project Server 2010
I created an enterprise template in Project Professional and formatted it and set the font to Gill Sans MT, I then pointed the Project type to this project template.
When I created the new project type in PWA the formatting and font did not carry through to the new project.
Has anyone seen this behaviour before?
Kind regards
M

Do you find that if you create a project in project professional using a template and then save it the formatting is shown OK? So you only see this problem when you are creating the project from PWA and the plan template is picked up via the Enterprise Project
Type?

Invoice Descriptions are not carried to GL

Hi
In our R11 the Invoice Description in AP are carried to GL when we run the Payables Transfer to GL.
But in R12, im wondering why is it the Invoice Description that we had in Payables Module are no longer copied to GL Journal Description Column. Instead it showed "Journal Import Created".
How can I make the GL copy the Invoice Description in AP when I run Transfer Journal Entries to GL?
thanks
emgee

Hello emgee,
Please check your Accounting Setup.
Please follow this Navigation:
*(N) General Ledger > Financials > Accounting Setup Manager > Accounting Setups*
- Query for the Leger being used
- Choose Update Accounting Options
- Update Subledger Accounting Options
- Under Applications: Payable, choose Update Accounting Options
- On the General Ledger Journal Entry Summarization field, choose No Summarization

CRM BP relationship not visible in tcode BP in ECC

I replicated the Sold to party and created Relationship HAS scn with another partner . The Partner is visible as Partner function in sales area data as partner function but cannot see it in BP tcode in relations tab in ECC.
What we need to do to get this in the BP tcode in Relationships tab for the sold to?

Hi All,
I got teh solution for this.
If you do not have mobile scenario, kindly do the following
customizing settings:
SAP Implementation Guide -> Customer Relationship Management ->
CRM Middleware and Related Components -> Mobile Scenario Setup ->
Activate Mapping Functions.
Here, please uncheck the 'Active' flag for all BUPA_REL and
BUPA_MAIN entries, which are mapped to function module
BP_REL_CRM_TO_CDB.

Can Plan Layout in Muse be carried through to a site's folder structure when hosted on a 3rd party site?

I've reworked a site in Muse (desktop version only, at this stage). Some of my pages in the old site had very high organic search results in Google, so I need to keep the file structure of the new site the same. Since I published the Muse version of my site a few days ago, the number of visitors has literally dropped to just 10% of what it usually is!
Muse seems to create only a flat site (all pages are created directly in the root folder only), and the Plan structure in Muse does NOT carry through to the file structure of the site when published with "Upload to FTP host" . I am concerned that the Plan layout is only concerned with menu auto-fill functionality, and does not reflect any physical structure.
Any solutions? Am I doing something wrong, or is this a limitation of Muse?
Many thanks.

I've reworked a site in Muse (desktop version only, at this stage). Some of my pages in the old site had very high organic search results in Google, so I need to keep the file structure of the new site the same. Since I published the Muse version of my site a few days ago, the number of visitors has literally dropped to just 10% of what it usually is!
Muse seems to create only a flat site (all pages are created directly in the root folder only), and the Plan structure in Muse does NOT carry through to the file structure of the site when published with "Upload to FTP host" . I am concerned that the Plan layout is only concerned with menu auto-fill functionality, and does not reflect any physical structure.
Any solutions? Am I doing something wrong, or is this a limitation of Muse?
Many thanks.

How can i distill the invoice which has not verified?

hello evryone:
   my problem is I want to distill the invoice which has not
   verified through the tcode MIRO.
   thanks in advance!

Hello,
Have you tried breaking your structure into 255 chunks? I don't know what the structure you are moving from looks like, but you should be able break it back up into the SOLI structure. The end of a line in SOLI doesn't create a Carriage Return/Line Break. You have to insert these yourself like in the following:
* Create document
      clear mail_line.
      move 'This is a test E-Mail'(d01) to mail_line.
      concatenate mail_line
                  cl_abap_char_utilities=>newline
                  into mail_line.
      append mail_line to l_mailtext.
What kind of attachment are you wanting to create - a text tab delimited file for reading in a spreadsheet application such as excel? You might try reassembling your data table into a single string with newlines where you need them. Then use function module SCMS_STRING_TO_FTEXT to turn it back into SOLI. This is what I have done in the past. I'm afraid without knowing more about your source structure and attachment type, this is about all I can tell you.
Vasanth

Invoicing party display made through OMRMB not working

Dear Experts,
We have made the field RBKP-LIFNR invoicing party display only through OMRMB, but it is not working when you running MIRO.
The field is still input only and the invoicing party can be changed at MIRO, what could be reason of not working.
Client wants that field to be display only in MIRO.
rgds

is there any way if I can attach or modify one existing screen variant to standard transaction miro...since I do not want to change the tcode, this I have asked since omrmb is not working so only transaction variant is the way..
Kindly suggest.
rgds

Invoice is not sent through e-mail (RRB)

Hi Good Morning,
This issue is related to RRB Invoice output.
Invoice has been created and saved, mail will be sent to the concern user after the batch job done.
Here the invoice has not been sent to the user through the e-mail.
The error log saysUnable to process output for consolidated invoice; Please use VF23 to process consolidated
Could you please share some information regarding this.
Thanks in Advance
VNR

Hi Santosh,
Thank you for your prompt response.
We send the invoices to the concern users through e-mails by running background job.
In this particular invoice the error occured " Unable to process output for consolidated invoice; Please use VF23 to process consolidated"as mentioned.
Its not invoice list it is an Invoice.
But not sure why system gives the error.
Appreciate your kind help
Regards,
VNR

Error message : Vendor is not an invoicing party in stock transfer PO

Dear All,
i need help on this issue
1. user create a Stock transfer PO
2. in condition he put condition but he forget to enter vendor code in condition detail.
3. GRN is done
4. after GRN he entered vendor code in the condition detail ( in the PO)
5. but at the time of MIRO user is getting error "Vendor is not an invoicing party"
Note : here it is not possible to reverse GRN.
so please guide me on this
Thanks
h shah

Hi,
Check the vendor for Fright vendor.
If fright vendor then check in MIRO --> selected planned delivery cost ... or not..
SAM

PO vendor is not an invoicing party

Hi,
Would like to seek for help for the following scenerio,unable to post transaction from MIRO to FICO during invoice verification level with the above subject.
Later, we found out the capex purchase order have worngly selected an invalid vendor which was the vendor is not created under our company code but the purchase order instead created the same purchasing organization and the purchase order have been posted previous fiscal year and the Material Management module period have been close.
Later, we try to extend the vendor which was selected worngly to our company code in order to proceed with the MIRO to resolve the problem. However, we still not able to proceed with the miro as system trigger error message item is invalid.
Please advise.

First check, whether the vendor is defined as invoicing party.
Secondly. you can overcome by taking the help of partner function. Check the account group to which the vendor master is assigned. Check what partner function schema can be assigned to the account group.If the partner function schema allows you to assign a different vendor as the invoicing party, please, then create a new vendor master, define it as an invoicing party and assign it to the wrongly entered vendor as an invoicing party on behalf.
I hope, you can overcome the issue.
Regards,
Ranjan

In MIRO i am getting error message " vendor is not invoicing party in STO

Dear All,
i create one STO MM. This is plant to plant transfer STO. i entered few conditions. for this conditions i mentioned Vendor in condition detail.
at the time of MIRO i am getting error message vendor is not invoicing party in PO ( STO).
i checked the vendo master. all partner function are maintained.
so please guide me
Thanks
h shah

HI,
Check u had done the below steps,
Create STO and input the freight/delivery costs in PO and assign the Transporter or Freight Vendor to the conditions by clicking on "Details" button in Conditions Tab
For that you have to do following settings;
Go to SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Purchase Order > Define Document Types > Here select "UB" and copy to a new PO Doc type.
In SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Conditions > Define Price Determination Process > Define Schema Determination > Determine Schema for Stock Transport Orders > Here assign Calculation Schema "RM2000" i.e. Stock Transfer Document to Schema Grp Pur. Org, STO Type (New One) and Supplying Plant.
Calculation Schema "RM2000" has condition type P101 which will pick up the MAP of supplying plant automatically during creation of STO in ME21N ("Conditions" Tab).
You can create new freight/delivery cost conditions in M/06 and assign in pricing procedure "RM2000" in M/08
After STO, do Outbound delivery in VL10D, then GR in MIGO and then go for LIV w.r.t. STO in MIRO
Here select "Planned Delivery Cost" and do necessary procedure.
Regards
KK

Invoice corrections Sales order- New Pricing is not carried out

Hi All,
waiting for some one to guide me in a right way...
I have Scenario where creating a invoice correction request with reference to Invoice document.New pricing is not carried in debit line item even though i changed the pricing date as current date for the line item
When i copied with the invoice document, 2 new line items are created with a same price conditions.
1st line item is a credit and 2nd line item is a debit item.
I need to do a price adjustment in debit line. So i maintained a new pricing record for the material to carry out the price.
To achieve this in customizing VTAF (billing to sales) I have tried multiple options as below in 2nd pricing type field as B,C,D,E and F
2nd Pricing type - B Carry out new pricing
C     Copy manual pricing elements and redetermine the others
D     Copy pricing elements unchanged
E     Adopt price components and fix values
F     Copy pricing elements, turn value and fix
But still the new pricing is not carried out.I tried to manually change the Pricing date in the line item level, still the new price is not updated in the order.
I have seen SAP Help in below link the Debit line can update with correct price point 3 in proces flow , check this below link for reference.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/dd/55feeb545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/content.htm.
Please help...
Regards,
Parthiban

Hello Parthiban,
I feel you are aware of the effect/functionality of 2nd pricing type.
In the invoice correction request, two items are automatically created for each item in the invoice to be copied (which you did mention):
- first item:   credit memo item
- second item: debit memo item
And for invoice correction request, a particular pricing type is needed for the second item.
So as per standard, you have to use pricing type 'E' for the credit memo item to guarantee that the item will not be changed.
And you should give a new pricing type to the debit memo item.
The system creates a credit or debit memo depending on whether a postive or negative difference is generated.
So that means
Pricing type will effect ItemCat Proposal-G2N
and 2nd pricing type will effect 2ndItemCatProposal-L2N
Now, make changes in pricing type based on your business requirement.
I hope this will assist you in understanding.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Invoicing Party not getting picked up in MIRO

Dear Experts ,
I followed the steps as under :
1. Created a PO w/o PI
2. Changed PO & added PI.
3. Did GR
4. Did IV , but the vendor in MIRO was the PO vendor & not the PI vendor .
5. Created Debit memo as the invoicing party was wrong .
After this too i have tried several times , but the system doesnt pick up the PI vendor .
I Cannot change the invoicing party in MIRO as for control purpose & business requirements , the field is display only .
Please suggest what could be wrong ?
Regards
Anis

Hi,
Check the PO .. which is picked the Invoice party partner..
If PO is picked the PI partner .. then it will not be any problem..
check the PI vendor number & recon. accounts.. how you have maintained..
MIRO it should pick automatically if you maintain the PI vendor before MIGO.
SAM

Invoicing Party In MIRO

Hi,
My problem is when I am doing MIRO the most of the fields in the header section loaded to the screen according to the PO one of the field is Invoice Party in the Detail Tab with label Inv. Party. But itu2019s open for input it means that user can change the invoice party and will go ahead. Now I donu2019t want that. user should not change the Invoice Party in MIRO for that I want to make this field only input field (Gray Filed).
I am trying to do same with Screen variant (SHD0) but there is some problem, so kindly request please arrane to give some document on this issue
If still have any doubt please revert back
Thanks in Advance
Warm Regards,
Mukesh Chejara

hi
best way is to change the message settings to ERROR.
WHen you change it the message must b coming like below
Account has been changed: Dependent data will be initialised
Message no. F5A119
so change this msg to ERROR with the help of ABAP guy.
check this thread
Problem in MIRO(IV)
for SHD0 take help of ur abaper
First you have to go in SHD0 and you will enter Screen Name ex
"miro" and the trasaction variant name you want to create (F5).
It will take you to MIRO and you will enter values. A window
will pop up asking you to check whatever you want to make
mandatory. Go through and save. Up at the top menu once you
get back to SHD0 initial screen, at the top menu, you will find
Deactivate Standard variant and again enter the Variant you want
to assign and go to the top menu and click assign variant. This
should work. It worked for me.
regards
kunal
Edited by: kunal ingale on Nov 14, 2008 8:02 AM

Excise invoice tab is not displaying in MIGO

Hi We have created MIGO document with excise details,every thing is fine at the time of MIGO posting,But, when i am trying to
display the material document through MIGO (display),excise details are not reflecting ( excise tab ),we are using ECC 6 EHP4
(604), and this is new implimentation.
Please advice any enhancement is missing or what could be the reason?
Cheers
KK

Hi,
it will come,
at the time of MIGO internal number will generate,
again we will post the excise invoice wrf to internal number through J1IEX,
the above is for the option "only capture excise invoice",
even we can see the excise invoice tab , if we select the capture & post option.
rgds

Invoicing Party relationship not carried through to PO in ECC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for